User Reviews (70)

Add a Review

  • Warning: Spoilers
    Some universities and colleges would grant a 4.0 average to the roommates of students that commit suicide. That said, there is always someone who figures out a way to get rid of an obnoxious student if it would mean grades one didn't earn. Leave it to some college kids to figure out a way to get into prestigious schools with little intelligence to justify the artificially inflated grades given to them in order to appease the ordeals they've been through.

    This is the premise of Dan Rosen's thriller "Dead Man's Curve". Mr. Rosen trying to capitalize on other movies directed to younger audiences, created a story with many twists and turns. Some of the plot devices work, while the viewer is left to ponder some of the logic behind what is presented on the screen. The film, as some of the comments do suggest, will resonate more with American audiences because they might be more aware of this curious fact that some of our higher institutions of learning reward students that come close to tragedy.

    There are four people that can gain admittance to Harvard, one of the elite centers for learning in the country. Tim and Chris conspire to get rid of the boorish and obnoxious Rand and by doing so, they will be admitted to the place of their dreams, almost by osmosis, since they don't have the grades to prove their intelligence. But Rand's body is never found, so can it be considered a true suicide? When the police appears to interrogate them, Tim suddenly switches his story and Chris' account of what happened is questioned by the detectives.

    The second plot involves Emma, who is Chris' girlfriend. She also has her own agenda. When Natalie, her roommate, who had been going with Rand, tests positive as being pregnant, puts the Canadian co-ed into a suicidal mood. Emma will stand to receive the good grades and has an assured future, or so it seems. It is at this point when another twist that comes out of nowhere occurs. Rand, who didn't die, resurfaces. His explanation doesn't convince, but here is where one gets to the real point in the film. Chris, it turns out has done some planning on his own, really wants to get rid of Tim.

    The intense Matthew Lillard gives an over the top performance as Tim, the man at the center of the story. Michael Vartan plays Chris and Randall Baliskoff is seen as Rand. Keri Russell, a gorgeous creature, appears as the sweet Emma, an ambitious girl, herself. Dana Delaney's role is not justified as the psychiatrist that acts as a sort of a Catholic priest, knowing the students' secrets, but not coming forward to denounce what really is going on.
  • NJMoon4 August 1999
    "Scream"'s Matthew Lilard is at his insane best in this variation on student life. Unlike another film which took a comic approach to the "dead roommate equals good grades", this film is deadly serious. Good performances aside, the script meanders and lacks true thrills, making it slow going at times. But hang in for the ending - as usual, the best part of the curve is the twist.
  • I really didn't expect much of Dead Man's Curve at first but I became immediately thrilled once I started watching it. The performances (especially Matthew Lillard) were great and I just dig it when a bad guy thrives as much as Lillard did in this movie. The bigger part of the film was pretty good and would have easily been rewarded with a 7 or maybe even a 7,5 but in the end it just didn't get away with it. In the end Dead Man's Curve just becomes one of those thrillers that wants to be too smart and too original / surprising, resulting in a very annoying and unbelievable ending. It would be rightful to say that by introducing twist after twist after twist the filmmaker succeeded in breaking the movie's neck. Since the ending for me was a big fat 3 out of 10 I find it very hard to make a recommendation regarding this film.

    6 out of 10
  • Matthew Lillard always manages to be the shining light of a film. He was great in Scream, even better in She's All That,and somehow managed to go one better in Dead Man's Curve. It doesn't matter how bad the film is, you can always count on Matthew Lillard. He plays disturbed killer Tim who, with the help of his room mate Chris(michael vartan), plots to kill other room mate Rand(randall bakinkoff). The story gets even more intense however, when Chris' girlfriend finds out. Lillard gives a fantastic performance(as always). The rest of the cast though, trail behind. They're not terrible, but they're just not as watchable as Lillard who plays his psycho killer with acute accuracy. In my opinion, Lillard is one of Hollywood's best up and coming actors. He has a superb career ahead of him and this film is one huge stepping stone that will be remembered as his leap to success. Top film with a fun and twisted story that will keep you hypnotized throughout. Rating=5/5
  • Insane college student figures out a way to get his grades the easy way. Murder. Everything goes his way as he outwits the police, fools the university staff, and pins the rap on his dopey partner. However, all is not as it seems and some surprises are in store for the viewer. Interesting little thriller, with some black comedy thrown in the mix: makes a guy wonder if such a rule could exist in a university without causing just such an incident.
  • Dead Man's Curve revolves around an urban legend that if your college roommate commits suicide, you get pass grades for the term to help ease your pain. Enter Chris {Michael Vartan} and Tim {Matthew Lillard} who decide to test this theory by offing their buddy Rand {Randall Batinkoff}. It's a deliciously evil premise that thankfully, in spite of the film's low reputation, makes for an enjoyable genre spliced viewing.

    Directed and written by Dan Rosen, Dead Man's Curve has a clever plot at its core, our pair of rotters, tho Chris is a sheepish accomplice to the dominant Tim, set it up nicely by way of chatty concerns with the school psychologist and the shifty purchase of depressing music. Aided by some women troubles in the mix, the pair execute their plan, but all is not quite that simple as the plot unravels it twists and turns and delivers an ending that is as genius as it is unexpected. And that's in a good way as well.

    The young cast, handsome and ebullient, do fine work here, particularly Lillard, who expands on his loony turn in Scream from two years earlier with much maniacal relish. The older actors, however, don't fair so well, courtesy of either being underwritten or merely for being plot fillers. But hey, if all lady psychologist's look like Dana Delaney then I'm going to sign myself up for a bit of therapy.

    Naturally with a premise like this it's far from perfect and the implausibility factors are high, but Rosen has a wry observation on American dorm life. Be it the pressures of success or the need to be part of a group, Rosen and his on form cast have created a darkly comic piece of devilment. The soundtrack is excellent, and for sure it's laden with misery from the likes of The Smiths and Bauhaus, while the Elk Neck Lighthouse location work evokes memories of tidy creepers from days of yore.

    A fine story told and executed well, give it a go and you may just be as pleasantly surprised as I was. 7/10
  • I`m shocked to see all these people commenting on what a clever plot this movie has, with intelligent twists....have you people very short memory span ? There are countless of situations and dialogue in the movie prior to the last 5 minutes which completely rule out the logic behind the final twist. Maybe if they had made a 5 minute short...or if there were some sort of parallell univers theory..just kidding.

    The movie is also a very bad mixture of several genres, thriller, horror, comedy, drama. It pokes fun of retards, canadians, stupid cops. Lilliards character is the most likeable in the whole movie, and thats hardly the directors intention. The generel good acting only makes the whole thing more provocative. They wanted to make a black comedy, but had no sense whatsoever.
  • Pretty decent premise but poor execution in many ways. The benefit of ONE semester of A's is hardly enough to stake the whole story/elaborate plan on. Instead of telling a solid story, this movie gets caught up patting itself on the back, thinking it's just that clever. Clever is when a movie shows you everything but you still don't see whats right in your face. This movie shows you everything, as well as unnecessary filler that only exists to throw off the viewer. The use of flashbacks to explain things that can easily be figured out is insulting to viewers and really dumbs things down. It takes away from the movie.

    I somehow missed this movie in the 90s, and just came across it. I would have loved it when I was young, as its in the same vein as Scream and Urban Legend-- though not a slasher. I was able to enjoy it but it was quite predictable.

    Matthew Lillard was amazing. He always seems like such a genuine guy in interviews, and I can clearly see he showed up for this movie, and brought all of his energy to his performance.

    As with many other late 90s movies, some parts aged horribly and were super uncomfortable.
  • sol121827 August 2008
    ***SPOILERS*** Over the top suspense mystery that takes place on an unnamed eastern Maryland collage. Having found out that if a roommate at collage commits suicide you get an automatic 4.0 average both Tim, Matthew Lillard, and Chris, Michael Vartan, who are sub-par students concoct a plan to get their other roommate Rand, Randall Batinkoff, to kill himself!

    Rand a nasty and arrogant creep who's constituently humiliating his girlfriend Natalie,Tamara Craig Thomas, in public and making a complete a** of himself is the perfect candidate to knock off with nobody, not even his family members, even missing him.

    Even though at first he thought it was a joke on Tim's part Chris reluctantly goes along with the plan to do Rand in. This happens late one evening at the light-tower just outside of the collage campus. Getting a very depressed Rand, who had just found out that Natalie is pregnant, to dink a full bottle of whiskey laced with rat poison he goes into convolutions and loses consciousness. With Tim leaving a suicide note in the empty bottle it's made to look like Rand did himself in over Nataie, after telling him that he knocked her up, dumping him.

    With Chris not having the guts to throw Rand down the Cliff, to make it look like he jumped, Tim finishes the job in having him fall to his death, if he wasn't dead already, to the dangerous rocks some 100 feet below. It's then that things start to get a bit, to put it mildly, out of hand with Chris not willing to get, feeling that he didn't earn it, his well deserved 4.0 average and his partner in crime Tim doing everything he can to implicate him in Rands murder!Tim goes as far as staging a tryst with Chris' girlfriend Emma, Keri Russell, for Chris to see in order to get him go to the cops and confess not only his but Tim's crime! While all this is going on Rand's body is never recovered and thus making it impossible for both Tim and Chris to get their coveted 4.0 average and thus being eligible to enter Harvard or Yale!

    The movie really gets ridicules in it's myriad of twists and turns that are so incomprehensible that their about as illogical as subatomic Quantom reality is towards modern Newtonian physics! You finally get the picture in the end to what's the story behind Rand's demise and who was really the person or persons behind it. But by then your brain has been so brutally battered and beaten by the films confusing and convoluted storyline, with about a half dozen plot twist, that you don't really care what it is!
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I get a kick out of Mathew Lillard's wackiness, so this movie was enjoyable, but by the time it's over it has seriously weakened itself with its desperate plot contrivances. It starts out solid and interesting, without boring pauses or over-long set-ups. It's suspenseful to see Tim's (played by Lillard) obnoxious behavior after pushing his room-mate, Rand, off of the cliff (beginning of the movie, not a spoiler). But the movie goes awry when it tries too hard to force twists & turns into the plot. It's a little suspenseful, but it's really more unconvincing and plot-holed than anything else by the end. One of those times where you say, "Oh!" when the surprises first occur, but then start scratching your chin and saying, "Wait...if he did this and she did that, and they knew this, then why did he ever say that and why did they even do that? Would he really have done that?" etc. It sacrifices its plausibility for cheap shocks, which aren't all that great. But it is an entertaining flick, and I'm not disappointed I rented it. Pretty good as far as these types of movies go, I suppose. I enjoyed the music and movie references (The Smiths, Joy Division, and "The Deer Hunter" becomes "The Beer Hunter"), they made it kind of witty and "hip" before it scrambled to out-do itself with run-of-the-mill plot-twists. Watch it for casual kicks.
  • at first, the cinematography looks good, so at least it has that...but this movie slowly descends into the depths of Hollywood hell. it twists so many times you completely get lost, and by the end of the movie, you have no idea what just happened! i suppose if i subjected myself to watching it again, maybe i would pick up something i missed before. but to be perfectly honest, it was so bad, i don't think i CAN watch it again. this movie makes no sense to me. what's so bad is that i truly believe that i actually DO understand everything about it. its just so bad that i'm having trouble really BELIEVING that i'm really understanding. i just keep thinking "there has to be something more..." if there IS indeed something more to this film, its completely and hopelessly buried under the layers of crap that make this movie what it is. don't waste your time on this piece of crap. if you want to watch something that will twist and turn and challenge your brain...watch a David lynch film.
  • I remember watching this quite a few years ago and enjoying it and decided to re-watch it again to see if I still did.

    It's an interesting idea and one that is executed very well. The plot is easy to follow and the fast paced script keeps things moving along nicely. There is plenty of suspense as the student plot to get higher grades spins out of control. The acting is mainly just passable apart from the always excellent Matthew Lillard who always plays the slightly maniacal jerk role so brilliantly and and there is an early appearance for the gorgeous Keri Russell.

    There is a great twist ending which along with Lillard's performance elevates this film above average for it's genre.

    This is not a great film by any means but it is very entertaining and well worth watching if you're at a loose end.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Did you hear the myth that if your college room mate commits suicide,that you get an automatic 4.0 GPA?Well,for two friends,Tim and Chris,it becomes their one way ticket to Harvard.But getting away with it will be the hard part.

    I just seen this movie,and thought it was great!And it probably gives college students crazy ideas of killing their room mates.I found it confusing at first,but everything makes sense with a shocking twist ending,where the tables are turned one last time.

    So,if you like myths,Scream and of course,hotties,then you'll probably enjoy this movie.
  • Ever heard about those movies that are totally misinterpreted or ignored? The Curve (aka Dead Man's Curve) is such one. It tells the story about some students how found out that once a roommate commit suicide that they are graduated, to survive the shock. I have no idea if these rules are actually existing but it's enough for some students to play the game anyway... What follows is a great movie in where the viewer is switched from one situation to an other (who is who, who is dead...) and they're all lead by the pervert performance from Matthew Lilard (Thirteen ghosts, Scream) who plays the role of his life. To give it a much more suicidal character, director Dan Rosen opts for suicidial music like Bauhaus and The Smiths. Also watch out for the moviegames the students are playing (the parody on the Russian roulette=scene in The Deer Hunter is superb). Totally ignored movie, what a shame....
  • At first, I thought it was something like Heathers, which was completely unappealing. As the movie went on, I realized it was sure, in that Heathers fashion, but it has its own identity. The script was quite intelligent and the acting was superb, although Keri Russell was quite annoying. It was a wittingly fun movie which may start out slow, but becomes a bit gripping in the middle which totally leads you to the fun end. I'd give it 7/10.
  • I went in expecting nothing, and was very pleasantly surprised. Matthew Lillard's performance is quirky and very entertaining, but the single reason to see the film is for an early scene which can only be described as spoofing _The Deer Hunter_ with a popular college drinking game. This is a "thriller", but I was laughing for five minutes straight.
  • As a horror fan, I can't say this movie ranks up there with the greats -- not by a long shot. But I found this to be a rather competent enough movie that is quintessential late 1990s horror in terms of its look and casting -- it has that slick and aware zeitgeist that permeated post-Scream movies.

    I did not think the twists were overdone, it felt rather balanced and I was pleasantly surprised by how things ended. This is particularly true of the Dana Delaney character's response to everything -- no spoilers to what I mean, just that the ending was better than the movie overall (if that makes sense!).

    It's definitely worth a watch, even if it's a one and done.
  • This is one of those self-satisfied movies where you're never really sure who's good and who's bad, but by the end you're quite sure you no longer care. The movie is clever at times and has some style, but it's so plot-twist happy, when the credits roll you have nothing to show for the emotional investments you've made and the sympathies you've built up for certain characters. It's like putting money in the bank, returning a week later, and finding out it's all gone. And that makes it, like the similarly constructed "Wild Things", a cheat. I don't mind being surprised, in fact, surprises are welcome, but I do mind getting blindsided by absurd twists that completely eradicate everything we thought we knew up to that point. (Unless it's done with an oblique faithfulness to character as in "The Sixth Sense".) Not to mention the fact that, evn though these are smart, high-achieving college kids, their machinations and manipulations are so needlessly labyrinthine and everything falls so perfectly in place for them - it's just laughably improbable.

    Matthew Lillard from "Scream" has the juiciest part and, while he's not an uninteresting actor, he's always SO manic, SO over-the-top, you have to wonder about the guy. He might want to familiarize himself with the "Less Is More" theory of acting if he can find the time.
  • This was actually a pretty OK movie. I thought it would be pretty bad given the 'teenage clique gone wrong' setup. However, because of the interesting premise, I decided to watch. One thing that drew me into movie was Lillard's presence (plays Shaggy in Scooby-Doo movies). This suggested some over-the-top drama. He delivered - pretty dynamic fellow. The dialog is pretty decent too - much of it is fairly witty. Also, there are some pretty good setups and twists and surprises that are decently done throughout the movie. Not bad - albeit a somewhat tired genre and limited setting. If the taglines and premise for the movie intrigue you, you'll probably enjoy it.
  • This movie started out showing a little promise with some clever in-jokes but any favorable response from me was dissipated as the unbelievable situations unfolded and I saw more of the thoroughly obnoxious and loathsome characters that populate the film. It's for people who like to see the bad guy win because ALL the characters here are bad.
  • AKS-631 July 1999
    Warning: Spoilers
    "The Curve" is a pretty good movie, even if I think it's rather confusing at times. It wasn't really engrossing either, but I guess it's an okay film to watch if you don't have anything better to do. And Matthew Lillard has really taken the expression "over-the-top" to another level. What I'm going to say next *may* be a spoiler (it was for me) so please don't read it if you haven't seen the movie. I have one last complaint (not about the movie though): here in Sweden they compare "The Curve" with "Wild Things" on the video cover. That spoiled much of the movie for me as I expected several and not just one turn, so the ending didn't come as a surprise to me.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    [WARNING: This review may contain spoilers.]

    This movie is based on the urban legend that if a college student has a roomie who kills himself, the university bestows an automatic 4.0 on the cohabitant. I heard this kind of crap when I was at University. In reality, this is B.S. However, like most urban legends there are always legions of idiots to keep the rumor alive.

    Well, rumors are one thing, but why on Earth would anybody want to spend real money to make a film based on such a preposterous premise. Apparently, the same dolts that buy into urban legends also appreciate bad film. I suspect their history of the Kennedy assassination is fulfilled by Oliver Stone's, 'JFK.'

    The film attempts to earn its gravy by coming up with extraordinary plot twists. Again, this fails. Of course, no one can see the twists coming, because they are so absurd and disconnected with what the script has previously built as a foundation, the attentive viewer must toss his popcorn into the air in disgust. There is more I could critique, but why bother?
  • The premise behind this movie is, how much is someone to compromise their morals in order to achieve academic gain? In the tradition of movies such as "The Perfect Score" and "Cheaters", but much, much darker, that question is answered...and then some. Matthew Lillard does an amazing job as a cunning, manipulative, and more than slightly psychotic college roommate willing to do anything to get ahead. The movie contains enough plot turns to make your head spin at times, but the acting is solid and the storyline was more than enough to keep me captivated throughout. Its an old question placed in a contemporary context, and it makes for a damn good horror film.
  • I remember viewing this movie back when it came out in 1998 and thought that it was fine, it had an interesting concept and had a very late teen 90's horror vibe to it, despite being more of a teen thriller. I do remember that it got unfairly branded as a 'Scream' knockoff (maybe because Matthew Lillard was that also) and quickly became obscure. Several years later I got the chance to view this again and found it quite enjoyable with its dark and twisted humour, cool storyline, manic plot twists and interesting yet loathsome characters.

    The plot focuses on two college roommates Tim (Matthew Lillard) and Chris (Michael Vartan) who plot to kill their other roommate Rand (Randall Batkinoff) and make it look like suicide and use the scam that if you're roommate commits suicide, then the college is obliged to offer straight A's.

    I do like the fact that the urban myth of the plot point always comes into play throughout the story. The twists and turns that feature throughout were mind-blowing and unpredictable especially towards the last act. The cinematography is decent with some impressive camera shots and the movie is shot well with an almost dark yet mesmerizing feel to the production.

    But there are quite a few flaws that prevents this from being truly great, firstly none of the characters are likeable at all, with nobody to root for, especially when things gets more revealed towards the end. There was also a lot of cringey scenes and dialogue with uncomfortable levels of cruelty from the male cast towards the female characters. Matthew Lillard being so in your face and over the top that he almost becomes unwatchable. Michael Vartan as the male lead was a little stiff in his performance and lacked that extra wow factor to make certain scenes pop.

    Overall 'Dead Man's Curve' or 'The Curve' as its sometimes called is an enjoyable little flick that just needed a few tweaks to the script and polish that could have made this even better.
  • In another botched attempt to cash in on the teen age slasher revival that Scream started (which even with its two sequels hasn't been able to equal it self) this horrible film is a waste of time. Yes there is a twist at the end but ...big deal. It sucks. Please save your time and money doing more useful things. I wish I had. Or watch it just to appreciate its sheer suckiness.
An error has occured. Please try again.