Add a Review

  • Even though I must confess that the premise for the movie still makes my head hurt. It just seemed mind-boggling to have a bunch of household appliances zooming off on a popcorn-powered spaceship made from a fan and a laundry basket.

    I can't say more than that simply to avoid spoilers, but since the original movie had an interestingly layered storyline where the plot seemed strangely plausible despite the absurdity of living appliances, this was just too bizarre to awaken the same feelings in me. The songs here are also pretty forgettable, but not awful.

    But with all that said, I actually found some satisfaction in the new character of Tinselina who had a decently touching character arc being a Christmas ornament never been used on a Christmas tree. And despite the out of this world premise that's what the movie is about, having a purpose and commiting to it instead of denying oneself.
  • When I first saw this movie, I felt it was not very good at all: a thin plot, new characters with no introduction, and so on.

    But then I saw Brave Little Toaster to the Rescue. If you watch Rescue between the original film and this one, then this one makes a lot more sense.
  • This was released as the second film in the "Brave Little Toaster" trilogy, but is actually the final adventure. The third film, "The Brave Little Toaster to the Rescue", takes place in between the original and this one. After all these years, I've finally seen the two late 90's direct-to-video sequels to the barely theatrical 1987 original, which I saw many times in my childhood, probably mostly before the sequels were made. I knew these two sequels weren't that popular, so I didn't have very high expectations for them. As it turns out, it's good I didn't, or I would have been let down. Neither of them is any match for the bizarre 80's Hyperion Pictures production, though both of them have their moments. "The Brave Little Toaster Goes to Mars" might be the worst of the three.

    Rob, known as "The Master" to his childhood appliances, has graduated from college and become a veterinarian. He is now married to his long-term girlfriend, Chris, and they live in rural house, along with Rob's old appliances (Toaster, Blanky, Kirby, Lampy, and Radio), and Ratso. One day, the couple returns home with a new baby boy, Robbie. At first, the appliances are not sure how this will work out for them, but soon find themselves enjoying the company of the "Little Master". One night, the Hearing Aid, who lives in the kitchen drawer, sneaks upstairs while everyone else is asleep. The Toaster wakes up and can tell he's up to something, so he tells the others about it the next day. The following night, they all witness Robbie being sucked out the window in a beam of light, and soon learn that he has been taken to Mars! In order to try and get the baby back before his parents wake up and realize he is gone, the Red Planet is where the appliances must go!

    Like the other two installments in the trilogy, this one features a bunch of songs. The baby song near the beginning seemed awfully sappy for a "Brave Little Toaster" song to me, but I guess the rest of them aren't that bad. I thought it would be kind of interesting seeing our appliance heroes on their only adventure away from Earth, but to me, it wasn't too entertaining after all. Neither of the sequels' plots can match the appliances' first adventure. The part where the appliances (original and new ones) are on their way to Mars and meet a bunch of helium balloons floating in space I found to be a weak moment, but I guess it's more for kids. "The Brave Little Toaster Goes to Mars" also lacks humour, much like "To the Rescue", but maybe even more so. There were parts I found amusing, such as Ratso making baby sounds into the intercom, but I don't think there were too many others. With Wayne Knight providing the voice of the Microwave, the character definitely could have been funnier.

    I probably would consider this sequel slightly inferior to "The Brave Little Toaster to the Rescue", but I feel I could give it the same rating, 6/10, instead of 5. Looking back, it doesn't seem all that bad, and has a pretty good ending. However, I certainly couldn't give either sequel the 8/10 I gave to the original. I haven't read Thomas M. Disch's "Brave Little Toaster" books, which the films are based on, but now that I've seen the entire film trilogy, I think the 1987 original was aimed at all ages, whereas the two late 90's sequels are more for kids. I'm not saying all adults should avoid them like the plague, I've seen worse kiddie flicks, but if you're an adult fan of the original, you could easily be disappointed by them. Regardless of your age, if you're going to watch all three movies, I suggest you watch this one last (even though it came in the middle), after you've seen the original and the other sequel, or else you could get confused.
  • Let me just say that the original "the Brave Little Toaster" is *still* one of the most charming animated features I've ever seen. It is, by turns, adorable, funny, sweet, and thrilling, and it didn't surprise me at all that some of its production team went on to produce "Toy Story", another one of my favorites.

    With all that said, this sequel has some really big circuits to fill. It is a big disapointment. It's cute but instantly forgettable, and while the first movie had fantastic music (the score is one of the most hauntingly beautiful I've ever heard for an animated film), the songs in this outing will *really* make your toes curl. As if that wasn't enough to insult us fans of the original movie, for some reason they didn't think we'd notice that Radio has a different voice and that Chris and Computer have been totally redesigned (for the worse). What does it say that the best part of the video is the preview for "Kiki's Delivery Service"? Go watch that movie instead.
  • I love the first Brave Little Toaster, and saw both its sequels The Brave Little Toaster to the Rescue and The Brave Little Toaster Goes to Mars. Both are rather bland in comparison, but both are watchable unlike some of the other animated sequels I've seen.

    Its problems are actually similar to the first sequel's. It is too short, and the story is rather predictable and rushed despite the quite nice ending. The songs are on the forgettable and unnecessary side too, the one at the beginning especially is the epitome of sap. Also it is lacking the eerie yet compelling, touching quality the original has.

    However, apart from some characters being re-designed and looking rather strange and off-model, the animation is not too bad. The backgrounds are decent enough as are the colours. The writing isn't as strong, but there are some humorous and poignant ones which I appreciated. The characters are still likable, and the voice actors do do very well, even the new-comers and replacements.

    All in all, a bland sequel, but not a bad one. 5/10 Bethany Cox
  • This animated, feature-length "Kiddie" film is definitely cute-cute-cute, but, then again, it certainly could have been a whole lot better, too.

    Of course, all of your favorite electrical appliances are here, including - Toaster, Lampy, Radio, Kirby, and Blanky - And this tale is to be their bravest adventure yet.

    Robbie, the master's baby, has been mysteriously beamed up to Mars. It's now up to our heroes, plus a houseful of new friends, like a fan, and a microwave, to reach the stars and bring the little tyke safely back home to Earth.

    This is a delightful, little tale that overflows with friendship and courage.

    So, get ready for a fun-filled mission with the brave, little Toaster, and all of his cool friends!
  • My son likes this movie, particularly the music. I have no strong feelings about it one way or another, except that the adults seem to be far too wide-awake and cheerful to be the parents of a new baby. My favourite part was hearing DeForrest Kelley as the voice of the Viking spacecraft.
  • The Brave Little Toaster is a must-watch, but don't bother with The Brave Little Toaster Goes to Mars. The latter was a disappointment and has nothing to offer that the original has. This time, the characters have to go to Mars to save the master's baby. There are too many characters, and some of the original and lovable characters from the original are over-looked, and there doesn't seem to be a coherent plot or lesson learned. It's a dull watch, and I personally don't know why they bothered. (Do note that I only saw this film sometime in my late teens or early twenties. I have seen the original in the past year, and it's still an adorable film.) However, see The Brave Little Toaster. Now.
  • THIS movie is a ROLLERtoaster of electrifying songs, enlightening LIFE lessons, and mind-zapping use of LANGUAGE, which WILL envelope YOUR heart in a warm, comforting embrace of emotion. The CHARACTERS are merry and bright with a HINT of cheddar flavouring. I'm a BIG FAN of this movie because it was LITERALLY cinematic PERFECTION.

    The first time I watched this movie, it was in my dad's basement in complete darkness. He had abandoned me to watch baseball or something, and I was terrified. This movie quickly became my new dad.

    I have cried only twice in my life. The first time was when I lost my 1992 Captain America collector's card. The second was when I heard the gripping story of WonderLuxe appliances.

    If you need something to fill the void in your soul, and you've already found Jesus, watch "The Brave Little Toaster Goes to Mars."
  • This was horrible. For a children's movie, it uses terms like Planned Obsolescence and has really odd characterizations. The first of the series is cute and makes sense. This one is a horrible waste of time for the viewer and was certainly a waste of time for anyone whose name is in the credits. If I had been on this project, I would remove my name. Quite frankly, the plot lacks any depth. The newly introduced characters are not developed well. The dialogue is stilted while many terms, such as planned obsolescence, are not understandable to the target audience. While I understand that talking appliances is a stretch for the imagination, the trip to Mars is even more far-fetched and the team did not do a good job of helping the viewer make the leap.
  • The Brave Little Toaster (1987) may have not been a realistic family film with living appliances, but it did have something special about it. The characters and scenes that were created using them were all memorable. While it's typically not associated with the Disney renaissance period, it is has a strong following behind it. But like many tent pole starters, the studio took advantage of it years later by creating direct-to-video sequels. While The Brave Little Toaster to the Rescue (1997) was by no means a match to the original, it did manage to remain fairly faithful to the universe that it was built upon. However, it was surprising to learn that much of the original voice cast did not return for the follow up. When it came to this entry, it's no longer surprising.

    Once again written by Willard Carroll, the title to this sequel is by no means lying about its premise. The brave little toaster and friends indeed go to mars. All because of one tired hearing aid (Fyvush Finkel) who was planning to leave everyone else behind and it just so happens, Rob & Chris' child somehow gets entangled into the tractor beam that was supposed to take hearing aid. The story has gone full out wacky. Direction hasn't changed either with Robert C. Ramirez in charge. The plot here is just so outlandish that it mostly rejects any kind of sense the first two stories had. The characters actually make it to mars by riding a fan driven laundry basket powered by a microwave. Sorry what? There are just too many questions to ask related to this.

    How does the microwave create enough power for the whole crew to break earth's gravity? What's the microwave even powered by? The first film had the sense to know that a battery was at least needed. Not to mention, Chris & Rob's baby is kept alive in space via a bubble. It's this kind of writing that really says the to the viewer that this is really a young kids film. Sure, the first film had some very adult themes, but this a complete departure from that entirely. That's not to say everything's bad,...but the story itself is. It's remarkably unrealistic to that of the what the original set up. Not to mention the execution of this story takes place in less than a day. In order to accomplish this, going from earth to mars round trip means the team must have been traveling super fast.

    For voices, the cast from the second film return with some additions. Deanna Oliver, Thurl Ravenscroft and Timothy Stack all return for a third time as their respective characters. Eric Lloyd, Roger Kable, Andy Milder, Jessica Tuck, Chris Young and Brian Doyle-Murray all return from the second film for their roles. Lastly, extras to the story are Calculator (Stephen Tobolowsky), Microwave (Wayne Knight), Faucet (Farrah Fawcett), Fanny (Carol Channing) and Tinselina (Kath Soucie). All whom voice their characters well, some of which viewers may not recognize initially until the credits roll. It's just unfortunate that these talented actors are participating in such an average sequel. Thankfully, they at least know how to act.

    The visuals to this entry are decent. Paul Lin who was animation director for this and the second film made the film look okay. For what the film had budget wise, this is passable animation. It's not expected to be anything blockbuster worthy. Music on the other hand was mixed this time. The songs created by William Finn are rather bland and don't contribute to any character development. This includes the lyrics written by Ellen Fitzhugh, which is just very boring. The only saving grace is that Jim Cummings sings one of those songs. As for the score, Alexander Janko returns to compose and while it isn't outstanding, he does have a reoccurring theme, which is appreciated. The music does fit the scene it is used for.

    This third sequel is not a terrible film, but it certainly ignores practically all the setting up the original film made. The voice actors do well and the animation is still fair for the film that it is. However, the music is middling at best and the plot is just very silly.
  • Oh my god The Brave Little Toaster Goes To Mars is one of the worst Disney movies from 1998 along with Belle's Magical World and Pocahontas 2: Journey To A New World, the plot for this third movie feels weak and boring, the characters well i don't know if they got flanderized or something, the music is alright, the animation is pretty bland, the backgrounds well i have nothing to say about them, the songs well they are not irritating, the title it feels pretty boring and cheesy. I would rather get stuck with the first movie and the sequel because these two movies are not the worst movies, they are awesome, but this third installment.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Newman is a microwave, and the appliances raise a baby. TEN STARS.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    *THIS MAY CONTAIN SPOILERS,I THINK*

    First off, This movie has a plot that is almost impossible would take form a few days to a month just to get to the moon. Now make that a laundry basket, Possibly going 10k per hour, going to mars, staying for a while, then going back in less then 8 hours. I mean, Really? And then there's the fact that in the original movie Toaster, in the water fall part, holds his breath under the water, yet then in this movie, you see him telling Ratso that rats would suffocate in space. This is a real disappointment to me. I watched it and it sucked. Especcily the music. Bottem line: It sucks