Add a Review

  • mstomaso13 March 2006
    I never played the computer game, and knew nothing about it. I was drawn to this film because of the bold animations, but didn't expect the film to do anything for me beyond simple entertainment. I was pleasantly surprised. The excellent voice talent and stunning animation allow Final Fantasy to drawn you in just as well as a live-action version would have. It is very easy to forget that the characters you are watching are animations, and the action is CGI.

    A meteor has struck the earth, carrying with it phantoms who strip away the life energy of whomever they contact. Dr. Aki Ross and her mentor Dr. Ced are locked in a stand-off against the earth's military forces, whose solution to this invasion may be worse than the invasion itself, and the mysterious phantoms who seem to have no specific purpose and can not be fought using conventional means. Following up on a quasi-mystical theory of Dr. Ced, they set out to collect 8 living spirits which must be used to harness the life force of earth itself in defense of the planet.

    This film is dark and beautiful, with each scene a masterpiece of animated art. It feels less like a computer game than an immersive experience in an alternative universe.

    A fast-paced action film, Final Fantasy blends elements of folklore, science and animated battle sequences into a satisfying, well balanced and well paced film. It is probably the most thoughtful computer game -inspired film I have seen.
  • a2zol11 May 2005
    Wow, I guess there is SOME hope for video game adaptations. While not a direct translation of the Final Fantasy video game franchise, it is written by the series creator, whose name I cannot remember. On top of that, his video game company branched off into a film company (Square Pictures) just to go and make this movie. At least one can't complain about the handling of the material.

    But the big question here is: Do these guys know anything about film-making? Maybe. Maybe not. Truth be told, they don't need to. The beauty of this movie is that it does something new. It blends the world of video game technology and storytelling with the art of film-making. It cuts corners on film-making, but its uniqueness makes up for it. I will admit that I'm a gamer, so I appreciate what was attempted here. What we get out of this movie is an impressive display of what animators and video game technology can do together. I know there are other CGI movies out there, but, unless I am mistaken, they have all followed the over-the-top cartoony path. This is where Final Fantasy stands out. The animation is swelling with reality. From a technical standpoint, this is a gem, and a reason at the least to give it a rent.

    The storyline is subject to much scrutiny though. It's not for everybody. This IS a film of Japanese origin, so anime fans will be right at home with it. For the mainstream audience, however, that remains to be decided. Although the script was revised to suit North American localization (and done very well might I add), it still is very Japanese in style, albeit with a bit less surrealism. It's fast-paced and a bit abstract at times, but it is coherent.

    In the end, I would say that one should rent this just to see the technological achievement at the least. It's safe to say that all would agree with that point. Depending on the person, you may get into the storyline as well. Either way, you'll walk away with at least part of you satisfied.
  • It's not very usual that a movie based on a game turns out to be a stunning movie. But Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within, however, is just that. The incredibly realistic characters and beautifully rendered backdrops in this movie make it a fascinating work of CGI. Unfortunately, its story falls short of anything but a rather boring Sci-Fi plot, which I'm sure is what caused it to be such a failure in the box-office.

    The Spirits Within follows a young scientist named Aki Ross, who shares a belief with her colleague Dr. Sid that with the collection of 7 spirits they can stop an invading alien race and save the earth. Being a fan of the video game series of the same name, I remember getting pretty excited for this movie when it first came out. After seeing it for the first time, I could not figure out why in the world they would call this movie "Final Fantasy". Aside from a few subtle references to characters and themes from the video game series, it does not contain enough blatant similarities to possess the Final Fantasy title, and I feel like this should have been a more important goal in directing this movie. It was a great choice to have done this movie in CGI rather than in live-action, as one of the most captivating things about the Final Fantasy series are its fantastic cinematic scenes. To have a whole movie based on the quality of an epic Final Fantasy cinematic really shows the hard work that goes into creating all of these scenes. Every model in the movie displays a high level of detail from the main characters to the ships that they fly in. The freckles on Ross's face allow for intense close-ups. The subtle movements of their facial structures make them more interesting to look at. It's an art form that was very well presented in this film. In fact, this was the first full CGI film to feature fully realistic characters, modeled to look like real actors. The fact that it is a computer generated movie allows more freedom to conduct scenes and also set camera angles in places that would be impossible to get if it were shot in real life.

    Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within portrays a mastery of computer generated imagery for its time. It's a fine tribute to the wonderful cinematics of the Final Fantasy series. But it doesn't possess a very original plot line, which doesn't even portray enough references to be called Final Fantasy, and should have just been another Sci-fi called "The Spirits Within".
  • ndavidg27 October 2004
    I don't know why nearly all the critics bashed this film. I thought it was great! The main reasons people have dogged it is because they don't follow the plot and they don't think the animation looks real enough.

    I did not have any problem following the plot. The second word in "Final Fantasy" is a description of the type of movie this is. It deals with the supernatural. The spirits, or "essences" of earth are gathered to fight the alien gaia, as the arms and weapons used against the alien spirits are ineffective and in fact destructive.

    This movie introduced me to the concept of the gaia, which I believe is a great metaphor for understanding how all life on earth shares a common spirit. I don't truly believe there is a gaia, and you don't need to either to enjoy this film. But perhaps some found that this conflicted too much with their beliefs.

    Now as far as the animation, this is the most realistic portrayal of human characters to date generated by a computer. If you watch some anime films, where there is a lot of action, they will show a frame for a long time with only the mouths moving. People enjoy these animations. Then why is this movie criticized so heavily for not looking real enough? It's rather ironic. You should watch this movie expecting an animation, not a full-feature film with real actors.

    One explanation for this reaction is that, like figures in a wax museum, characters that look too real but are not creep us out because they remind us of dead people. But perhaps this is fitting for this movie, because the soul of the earth is sick and life on the planet is reaching its end.

    In any case, I enjoyed this movie, and I liked the message. If you like animation and enjoy a good fantasy story, you will like this movie.
  • While it's a technical triumph, it's not a compelling story. It is head and shoulders literally beyond what Robert Zemeckis gave us in The Polar Express (2004). The faces and hair look very realistic. It'll be some time before it's surpassed by the likes of Avatar. It all boils down to the faces. My biggest compliment is that they look human.

    The story is that in the future, the Earth is invaded by a strange race of ghost like phantoms. The only way to survive is to live in cities surrounded by shielding. The phantoms are a mystery that is never quite explained satisfactorily. It's a mystery that nobody really cares about except maybe the people who play the video game. While the action is pretty good, the story always gets into the way. Sometimes it left me scratching my head.
  • The thing that struck me about FINAL FANTASY is how unoriginal the script is : A female scientist is saved from an alien menace by a mixed sex multi ethnic military team . There's a couple of close scrapes followed by some techno babble and obvious exposition about saving Planet Earth with a blatant baddie on the human side a closed mind military type and all the good humans open minded scientists . There's some flirting with lines like

    " Get yourself a girlfriend "

    " I'm working on that "

    before the heroes take part in a very spectacular climax .

    It sounds like every Sci-Fi block buster ever made in the last 20 years and to be honest I was reminded of both ALIENS and STARSHIP TROOPERS more than a few times

    But FINAL FANTASY wasn't produced or marketed as a groundbreaking plot - It was marketed as a groundbreaking CGI movie , and I thought as entertainment it succeeded in pleasing this viewer . Of course movies with vast amounts of CGI like the LORD OF THE RINGS trilogy only work when you don't realize you're watching CGI and in this respect FINAL FANTASY is a failure and it's not helped by the characters voiced by James Woods and Donald Sutherland looking nothing like the two actors ( Did anyone else think Sutherland's scientist looked exactly like Robert Englund ? ) though to be fair at least the dialog was synchronised with the animated mouths and the sound editing and sound effects are superb and despite everything it is entertaining

    Seven out of ten
  • The movie is really good looking but also surprising to see how much the techniques have outdated already. I remember when the movie came out how impressive and revolutionary it all looked. People were actually worried that soon real actors would be replaced by computer animated characters and the way of film-making would change forever. On my most recent viewing I wasn't that impressed anymore and thought that especially the facial expressions looked quite wooden. Amazing how fast and how much computer animated techniques still evolve every year. Who knows, maybe in 50 years from now people would look at this movie and call this the 'first step' in the direction of revolutionary new film-making.

    This movie was much hated and also bombed at the box office, although I think that the professional critics were really that negative about it. I actually remembered this movie receiving more praise than hate from them. It was the audience that caused this movie to fail and bomb, although the movie itself is also to blame for that. It really wasn't the best choice to include 'Final Fantasy' into this movie its title, since this movie has really nothing to do with the immensely popular game series, with the same name, from the same director and company. It was the reason why people disliked and even hated the movie. Who knows, with a completely different name and marketing, this movie might had become an huge and popular hit.

    The quality for it is definitely there. The story is original and interesting enough and its look and style also definitely makes this movie one well worth watching.

    The story is quite unusual, since it prominently features some spiritual subjects. The entire main plot line relies on this. Yet the story is told in such an easy and understandable way that you start believing in the story, even though it gets highly unusual at times, especially toward the ending.

    With just the story of the movie, the movie really wouldn't had been a good one to watch. It therefor features also lots of action sequences. Some of the moments and characters reminded of movies such as "Aliens" and "Starship Troopers". It was obvious that the movie was also inspired by this. The movie would certainly had been bad and a bore without the Deep Eyes, the military characters of the movie. It makes the movie great and pretty awesome to watch,

    The movie is also definitely helped by the fact that it has a great, Nazi looking and Nazi like acting villain, voiced by the incredible James Woods. The character has such a great evil look in the movie, without exaggerating things too much.

    All of the characters but especially the environments and aliens are greatly animated. It's awesome to see the streets of a post-apocalyptic New York City, with lots of details in it. The movie features some great big and impressive looking sequences.

    All the characters are being voiced by some well known actors, such as; Ming-Na, Alec Baldwin, Ving Rhames, Steve Buscemi, Peri Gilpin, Donald Sutherland and the earlier mentioned James Woods. These are not only great actors but also persons with great voices. So great casting work here!

    Also the musical score by Elliot Goldenthal is surprisingly great. He doesn't compose an awful lot of big scores but when he does, the end result is always something special and great.

    Of course the movie isn't as great as it could had been and it has some missed opportunities with its story and characters. Nevertheless a perfectly great and entertaining movie to watch!

    7/10

    http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I remember when "Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within" came out. All the talk was about the excellence and the detail of the CGI. It was a very big deal that the graphic images captured strands of the hair. Sadly, I don't remember any talk about the movie's storyline.

    I'm not familiar with the Final Fantasy video games hence everything was new to me. FFTSW takes place in a dystopian future in which alien "phantoms'' have invaded Earth. They are so aggressive and ubiquitous that the remaining humans were driven into barricade cities where they can be protected from the phantoms.

    Our protagonist Dr. Aki Ross (Ming-Na) and her mentor Doctor Sid (Donald Sutherland) are looking for eight "spirits" of "Gaia" in order to combat the deadly effects of the phantoms. They figured out that the phantoms are nothing more than "confused alien spirits" which makes them aggressive and deadly. The question was, "What will make them unconfused? And how many human lives should be sacrificed to unconfuse them?"

    It became a battle within a battle. Aki and Sid were at odds with the military types in order to find a non-combative solution to their phantom problem whereas the main military honk, General Hein (James Woods), preferred to use Earth's most powerful weapon to destroy the phantoms. The only problem is that this superweapon, known as Zeus, would also destroy Earth's "spirit" and hence Earth itself.

    Aki wasn't going to be able to find her spirit solution on her own. For that she would need the help of military guy and love interest Gray (Alec Baldwin). He and his team of Ryan (Ving Rhames), Neil (Steve Buscemi), and Jane (Peri Gilpin) would be at her service to essentially make sure she survived and her spiritual solution was fulfilled. It was all love and spirituality in the end of this expensive animated sci-fi flick, but in the end it was very much style over substance. The CGI was a modern marvel while the story was modern mediocrity.
  • It's a pity this movie failed at the box office, because in my opinion, it's really good. It combines combines the classic dystopic sci-fi future with a scorched Earth, a few heroes struggling against enigmatic aliens and a corrupt military force, action style sequences that are at times quite intense, and the typical slow-paced Asian movie storytelling. Add to this a rich amount of influences from the FF games, including eight mysterious spirits that must be found in time or the heroine will succumb, as well as a lot of mythological references that must be taken for granted rather than analysed to bits if the viewer is to find any pleasure in this film.

    The trouble is that the FF video game fans wanted a story based on the games, or on their particular favourite in the series, and were disappointed with both the story, the setting and the characters. The average sci-fi movie fan, though, who ought to have loved the wicked general (excellently voice-cast by James Woods) and his huge space cannon, as well as the 'Aliens' styled surroundings and technology, was put off by all the talk about spirits and world souls. Leaving for a few of us who went to see the film with no real expectations, to enjoy it.

    Because it is a good film. The animation is, for the most part, excellent, even if some scenes have a too blatant 'look what we can do' boast to them. Particularly all the scenes of Aki's hair waving in the wind. Personally, I didn't think the story was either too slow-paced, nor too weird. It works well, especially if you like Asian movies. For the European and American market, though, there's probably not enough action and too much talking.

    If this movie had been released this year, it would probably have been given a better reception. The thought of fully computer animated films isn't as new and strange anymore, and with films like Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, The Ring and Hero, the west is opening up for the Asian way of telling stories. I hope to see more films like this, at least if they are this well made. 9/10
  • Warning: Spoilers
    And if you're a fan of the Final Fantasy video games, you certainly will be expecting too much. I, like many, have been really excited about this movie for four or five years now, drooling at every little pic or clip we were given by the film's web site. The finished product is, unfortunately, little more than a popcorn movie. Still, as far as popcorn movies are concerned, it is a very good one. Ealier this summer, I had a lot of fun at The Mummy Returns. Final Fantasy was more fun and, by the end, it was somewhat emotionally involving.

    SPOILERS (also for the games Final Fantasy 6 & 7)

    Story: the script is probably the film's weakest point. It's not bad, but it is disappointing. The reason for this comes mainly from the comparison between the film and the video games, specifically Final Fantasy VI and VII, easily the two best role playing games ever made. Those who haven't played the video game might scoff, but both of those games were enormously powerful in their emotions. The characters of both of those games were as complex as any in a good sci-fi/fantasy novel. I know plenty of people who cried their eyes out when Aeris was killed. Ditto when Shadow dies in FFVI. I have always thought that those two games could make awesome television series. They're too long for feature films.

    Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within should not have been written by American writers. The film is too imbued with action/sci-fi cliches, and it borrows heavily from Aliens. The antagonist is particularly weak. They give him a reason for his actions, but I never felt it. That explanation felt more like an excuse that the writers gave him. The main character, Aki, is decently well developed, as well as Dr. Sid and Grey. I wish they all had a little more background, but what they have gives them some dramatic weight. Of the three supporting soldiers, only Neil, voiced by Steve Buscemi, has a character (which has a lot to do with who is voicing him!). The other two, Jane and Ryan, are far too much like cognate characters in Aliens to be worth much. The Phantoms are an interesting invention. Their motives are pretty original. It's not cliche, anyways.

    Animation: well, it takes the cake as far as computer animation goes. It exposes Shrek's animation for the mediocrity it is and should be recognized as. The humans look a lot like humans. You can even see the veins on the back of Aki's hand. Unfortunately, the human characters' expressions are nil. They almost don't exist. Only one character ever smiles, and the animators' inability to make the character do this convincingly provides the screenwriters a good excuse to make all the characters dire and depressed. These computer animated characters just cannot express emotion in their faces. I am not sure that they ever will. Anyhow, that has to be the next big step in computer animation. Gestures also have a penchant for being choppy and stiff and, much like the realistic video game computer animation that has been produced in the last couple of years, heads bob unnaturally while speaking.

    Still, go see the film, especially if you have a great theater showing it. It's exciting and fun. Just buy a big bucket of popcorn and enjoy the show. 7/10
  • This is outstanding animation and - when it was released on DVD - some of the best 5.1surround sound I had heard on a DVD. The problems were that (1) the characters were not ones you could care about and (2) the film is too long. Anything over 100 minutes generally is too long for an animated film, in my opinion. They are better around 80 minutes in length.

    It's not boring; the visuals and sound alone are state-of-the-art but it was just an uninvolving, unlikeable story for me. After awhile it was hard to care for anyone and I mainly watched to admire the art work.

    It's an adult (some swearing, but mild) sci-fi film with a lot of occult nonsense (spirits, ghosts and the like) thrown in the mix. As usual, the military man is the villain.

    This animation was made to look life-like and it mostly succeeded. It almost was eerie at first, hearing the voices of Donald Sutherland, James Woods, Steve Buscemi and Alec Baldwin but see other human-like faces. It didn't seem to fit.
  • A superb film - I'm so very glad that I ignored those who condemned this. I bought it on the recently released 2 DVD set (which in itself is worthy of purchase even if you didn't like the film - simply loads of extras, commentary tracks, etc).

    I loved the overall 'feel' of this movie - it invokes a sense of wonder in me that few films have managed to achieve. It goes without saying that visually (and aurally) the movie is a feast, but more than that it is a movie for the soul.

    Ignore those that don't like it - inevitably they simply didn't understand it. It IS a convoluted (but ultimately simple) plot and you need to pay attention, but if you do so you will be well rewarded.

    Definitely a movie to be savored.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Final Fantasy Spirits Within is a 2001 motion capture Sci fi featuring the voice talents of Ming Na Wen,Alec Baldwin,Ving Rhames,Steve Buscemi and Keith David.

    Set in the year 2065, the next great assault against an invading race of phantom-like aliens is about to be launched. Dr. Aki Ross(Ne Wen), a brilliant young scientist, races to find the invaders' secrets, not only to save the planet, but herself as well after her body becomes infected by alien particles. She teams up with the prestigious Deep Eyes military squadron, led by her old friend Grey Edwards(Baldwin). But as Aki, her mentor Dr. Sid, and Grey work toward a peaceful end, the scheming General Hein(James Wood) devises a plot to eradicate the aliens in one swift, destructive blow...even if it destroys the Earth right along with them.

    Today is my first time in over 17 years I have seen this film as it used to be on TV back in the early 00s. The motion capture is good and the voice acting is good too. Good movie.
  • During the first 20 minutes, I was riveted by the plot. The animation was spectacular. The score and sound effects were booming, especially as played on DVD. The dialogue was not as bad as some say. Actually it was quite believable. Buscemi stole the show with his wisecracks. I don't think this film was "predictable". If it was, then why are there so many unanswered questions at the end. If anything it was too unpredictable. Somehow along the way, the characters failed to explain how the eight spirits would get rid of the aliens. Second, I have a problem with the general. OK, his family was killed by the aliens and he is consumed with killing them. But you don't get to that position without having some common sense. He already had proof of her dreams to wake the council up, why did he have to let the aliens in the city. Third, how come the Zeus cannon is so powerful that it can destroy the Earth's Gaiia but fail to kill Captain and Aki when they are down in the crater. I guess I was expecting a nuclear blast or something. Fourth, how do the phantoms "feed" off the Zeus cannon? Fifth, how does Aki manage to project the spirits to kill off the aliens and Sixth, why does Captain have to die to save everyone?

    Overall a 7 for animation, compelling characters, and score. I deduct points for plot holes and some unbelievable characters (the general)
  • I've waited for this one for quite a while, as have most of Square's fans. There is a lot riding on this film, including the future direction of CG in movies, the proud heritage of a name brand, and the chance to release a worthwhile movie during a string of bad summer flicks. So, does Final Fantasy live up to it's hype?

    Mostly.

    First, the bad. No, it has nothing to do with the games other than name, but then the majority of the storylines of the games had nothing to do with each other, either. The plot is not necessarily original, with marauding aliens nearly vanquishing humanity while a desperate band of outsiders hold the key to winning (tired sci-fi, to be sure) and even the animation has it's faults, mostly with the mouth movements and a few emotions lacking, as the eyes and lips, and even hair had detail but no-one's cheeks or throats moved, giving the characters a bit of a puppetry feel at times. The movement of humans in CG is still not quite fluid, but getting much better. Also, the movie slows down considerably during the last twenty or thirty minutes, which is perhaps necessary for the plot, but the change in pace was notable, even with the awe that the movie's end was aspiring too.

    But enough nit-picking.

    The Good. The imagery in this movie is startling, imaginative, complex, even awesome at times. It's amazing that while the machines, vehicles, and mechanics in the movie are so realistic and detailed, so too are the organic forms such as the alien presence (sometimes seemingly more fluidly animated than the humans!) and the incredible landscapes. It is obvious how much imagination went in to so many aspects of this movie. The soundtrack, while not exceptional, is very complimentary and captures the dark feel with the fast action and triumphant climaxes. The characters were distinct, like-able, and voiced very well (even if the digital mouths don't quite match up most of the time). The emotional scenes, while certainly not perfect and a bit awkward, should be given grand credit for achieving the level they do convey. If you let yourself go, it's not impossible to be entranced by all that this movie actually manages to pull off. If nothing else, then the effects alone are worth seeing, if the somewhat hokey spiritual elements of the plot turn you off. (If you consider the Force to be hokey, don't bother.)

    The Surprising. Well, I was a bit put off by the simplistic way the characters would look at each situation and then spell it out to the audience, though there is more to the plot than casual sci-fi fare. Because of this, the dialogue was a bit goofy at times, but at least it usually fit the characters. But every good thing you've heard about the quality of the CG work in this movie is true- it really is a site to behold, if nothing else than for the effects. As I mentioned earlier, if you consider how much this movie is trying to do, it's amazing that it pulled off everything nearly as well as it does.

    So, I think that most will be pleased, some will critique it heavily on the negatives and not be as impressed, but the bottom line is that it is definitely worth seeing. Quality work in most areas, even story and screenplay in my opinion (though that's certainly the most debatable point.) I left the theater without being disappointed, something I cannot say for the majority of cinema fare.
  • Different from movies like Advent children. I can see the fact that the planet has energy life like the one in final fantasy vii, but it honestly would have been better to just name it differently. The film is not bad at all, sci fi, apocalyptic and tragic with beautiful graphics but the story is too hard to follow (aliens that you don't understand if are bad or just a plague, or what's the point of the 8 spirits) and leaves you without answers at the end. Worth a watch maybe. For me 7.5.
  • There are many moments in FINAL FANTASY when you almost forget that the entire film, including the "actors," is computer generated -- the faces have pores, the skin of the characters is imperfect with freckles and and wrinkles. (The effect is almost creepily realistic: Capt. Grey Edwards has a scruffy, sexy look; he's very hot, and I kept wanting to see him with his shirt off, which left me feeling weird and confused.) But then they talk, with great, expressive voices like those of Alec Baldwin and Donald Sutherland, and there is NOTHING THERE. The computer technology can reproduce the mechanics of acting, but not the ineffable qualities that make you care about the characters. When the heroes, Grey and Aki, finally kiss, it's almost pornographic in its lack of emotional commitment -- rather like sculptures being molested by puppets. The script is a joke, impossibly hard to follow and a bit overlong. But I cannot help but feel compelled to recommend it, even half-heartedly, because the film IS all CGI and is eye-popping. Years ago I was so caught up in the then-new efforts of Japanimation (of AKIRA), I could see beyond the plot holes. I'm not so forgiving now, perhaps, but there will always be a proper place to suggest seeing a movie that's deeply flawed just because you feel you may be witnessing the birth of a new filmic expression.
  • Turanic27 December 2020
    I would lie if I would say the story in this film will blow you away, but if you like semi-hard science fiction you will enjoy it. The film has nothing to do with general Final Fantasy games, but overall sci fi concept is decent enough. I think the main reason this film failed in box office is because the story is difficult enough to follow, the aliens are pretty alien and the lack of western humour. I think the film best compares to some of the Star Trek movies, they appeal to certain audience, but defiantly not everyone. So overall if you are looking for a sci fi film for the evening you want to watch alone and not feel like you wasted your time this might actually work ...
  • The only thing keeping me back from giving this higher than a "5" is the fact that, although the animation is superb, the animators should have spent a little bit more time on the mechanics of the human face (for expressions and speaking) and some of the other human body parts were noticeably off (look at Aki's hair when she's bent over or hunched, it never loses its form.) Had the animators given a bit more of the trifles the extra polish then this movie would have been more believable, and therefore, better.

    As it stands, based on video games, the plot is a little lacking, but there are movies with flesh and blood actors that have the same problem. I'm not counting off more for that slight than I would any other movie.

    With all that said, this is still a tour de force in computer animation, and it will be a long time before it is matched or beaten in the quality of the human representations that are depicted. I liked this so much, I bought the DVD. 'Nuff said.

    But still, nothing more than "average fare," thus the reasoning behind the rating of "5" that I give.

    But is "average" bad? No. Not in the least. Average, as I see it, is average amongst all like movies (genre.) This puts it squarely in good company.

    Now, had the animators spent the extra week or two on the small things that I didn't like, I would have given this probably a "6," which, although not seemingly so much better, actually is. To me, a "6" is a "superior or above average film, will withstand multiple viewings."

    In the end, I wish I could give half-point increments, because then I'd give this closer to a "6" than this is given, but as it is if push comes to shove I always round down.
  • franklin_phraner10 November 2001
    This film is a dream come true for any science fiction fan. Unfortunately, this film was not as popular as it truly deserved to be. It shows how powerful the media can be when it comes to squelching a foreign (in this case Japanese) film. It is by far the best computer animation ever to be shown. If only the American computer animators could be this good! I was really sorry they took the film out of the theaters so soon... before the general public had a chance to really enjoy this film on the wide screen.
  • I have heard for years about FINAL FANTASY THE SPIRITS WITHIN because it's based on a famous videogame, it was aired often in Italy until some years ago and has a star-studded voice over cast. However, it has also the reputation of being a box office bomb and for a few years I avoided. But last July I finally saw it and while I didn't loved it, I could see why it has a mixed bag reputation.

    In the year 2065 Earth is infested by the Phatoms, an alien race that if comes close to an human it can take away and suck the soul of a person making it die, and the remaining people on Earth live in protected cities. Scientist Aki Ross is working with dottor Sid (Donald Sutherland) on the research of eight live forms that can contain a spirit, and these spirits, if united, could annihilate the Phatoms. Aki then joins a squad named Deep Eyes with Gray Edwards (Alec Baldwin) as the chief, and in the group there are also Ryan Whittaker (Ving Rhames) and Neil Fleming (Steve Buscemi). The Deep Eyes is soon forced to go against the evil General Hein (James Woods) because he is thinking of a drastic solution that could destroy the planet, but his plans will be thwarted towards the end.

    The CGI was nice. While not on par with that of Dreamworks and Pixar (in the same year SHREK and MONSTERS INC were released) it was still colorful and realistic. The voice acting was one of the movie's best things: Baldwin, Rhames and Buscemi were entertaining, and Woods as the villain was a highlight (along with Jean Simmons and Keith David as the council members). However, the film's problems (and the reasons why it bombed) were that the pace was a bit too slow especially in the second half and the character of Aki Ross a bit annoying.

    As it is, just a time passer but nothing more, and certainly not as bad as most of the reviews might make you believe.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    May contain spoilers.

    I realize that my friend Mason will probably not be too thrilled to lionized in infamy like this, but I have to include him in this review of Final Fantasy. About a month and a half before this film came out, we were being bombarded with commercials for it. I took one look at the trailer for the movie and said to myself, and then my wife, that this was going to fail and fail miserably. To me it looked like a cross between Aliens and T-2. The commercial and the trailer even went so far as to rip off some direct shots from Aliens and plot devices from T-2. If that was what the film was going to be about then there is no way it was going to succeed. People are stupid sometimes but not all of the time and anyone could see that this film was priding itself on the fact that it was the first film to be filmed completely on a computer. Great, but what they forgot was that the story was nothing that we haven't seen before. Here is the premise, a bunch of renegade soldiers are sent to a planet to stop a bunch of aliens or creatures from ruining what is left of Earth. You have a Linda Hamilton clone from T-2. You have every one of the important characters from Aliens basically cloned right down to Alec Baldwin playing Hicks, Buscemi playing Hudson and Terri Gilpin playing Vasquez. There was not one original idea in here so all they had to go on was the fact that they were computer animated and that they were one of the biggest video games around. So back to Mason. He was so confident that this was going to do well, he bet me that this film would make about 120 million dollars at the N.A. box office. I thought it would do something similar to last years box disaster, A.E. I guessed less than 35 million. Guess who was right?

    There are many reasons why Final Fantasy failed. One of them is that the film just plain sucked. I finally took my 8 year old step son to see the film and he is big fan of the video game. I myself am a pretty big fan of video games but have never really heard of Final Fantasy. So I sucked it up and antied up the $20.00 and went.

    To sum it up, we were both confused by what was happening, unamused at the humour and generally had no interest in the story or what was going on in this fictional world. When we left, Jonathin turned to me and asked me if I liked it? I replied no. He then began asking me questions hoping I could explain the plot to him. This happens in certain films that we see together. Questions were plentiful when we saw Mission Impossible 2 together. But this time, it was me asking him questions as well, hoping that his knowledge of the video game could help me comprehend what we just spent my twenty bucks on. But to no avail.

    Final Fantasy was destined to fail when they made it look like Aliens, T2 and the Abyss. James Cameron should actually sue them for whatever money they are going to make off this film because there is not a single line in this film that doesn't seem to come from James' vernacular. When films try to sell you on a gimmick, and not the actual film itself, then they are, in my opinion, destined for failure. When Toy Story was launched, it included box office heavyweights like Tom Hanks and Tim Allen. And they were not telling us to see this movie because it was stop computer animation. They were selling us on the story and the actors. Final Fantasy did the complete opposite. The tag line wasn't even about the movie itself, it was about their break-through in computer graphics.

    UNLEASH A NEW REALITY.

    This should be a tag line for the new Microsoft 1.21 gigawats time machine or something, but not a tag line for a film. This 120 million dollar effort deserved to fail and Square pictures should now go back to the drawing board and try to fix (in a hurry ) what they did wrong here.

    0.5 out of 10--That being for Buscemi and Rhames supplying the voices of the soldiers. I hope they made a lot of money doing this abomination.

    One good thing did come out of this--and that was that Mason had to eat crow and admit that he was wrong. He also owes me a movie, and I'll be sure to collect.
  • yasenkiranov14 December 2012
    First of all,I would like to point out,that I haven't played any of the "Final Fantasy" games,so I don't know how much this movie follows them.On it's own however the movie is very well made and it's much,much better than a lot of other video game based films like "Street Fighter" or "Super Mario Brothers".

    A lot of people complain that the characters are less-then-riveting.In my opinion,that is not the case.I mean,Captain Edwards' squad members were kinda flat,but the other characters were alright.Our protagonist- Aki was very well developed.At first glance General Hein seemed like a stereotypical bad guy,but we get an explanation as to why he is taking such radical measures.

    Again,I don't know if the plot has anything to do with the video games,but it was,in opinion,very original and well thought-out.Some may think it's your cliché "aliens have taken over the world and the survivors must fight back with what little they have" plot,but that is not the case.The movie has both fantasy elements(the "spirits")and sci- fi elements(the technology).Sure,you have seen that in other movies,like the force in "Star Wars" and so on,but the idea they went with here is completely different.

    "Final Fantasy:The Spirits Within" is most famous for it's animation-and I can see why.This is the first movie to actually use CGI to create genuine looking human beings.It's still good,even by today's standards.The visuals and music work together to create some very amazing and powerful scenes,especially in the ending.

    "Final Fantasy:The Spirits Within" is a truly amazing movie.I strongly recommend it.
  • I must say - I was impressed - scratch that - extremely impressed by the visual fx the movie offered. It doesn't disappoint in that department. But, I think the movie failed to offer much else other than that. I mean, it wasn't particularly bad in any certain manner, but everything was rather lackluster. The voice acting was OK, but the plot was very, very predictable. It's the classic action/adventure story. At every turn, you can pretty much expect what will be coming.

    I'd say it's more of the same Hollywood has been churning out, but w/ a fresh look. Look elsewhere for a good movie. 6/10
  • To start off, I'd like to give a brief summary of the history of cgi. 2-D raster graphics in Westworld, wire frame graphics in Star Wars, the light cycle sequence in Tron, the stained glass knight in Young Sherlock Holmes, the first CG liquid effects in The Abyss and T2, Jurassic Park, Titanic, and now Final Fantasy. It is unfortunate for the movie that this form of animation has been vastly improved since, as can be seen in Robert Zemekis' latest films, The Polar Express and Beowulf. Final Fantasy remains competent in CG, but an equally accomplished plot is needed to make it a competent sci-fi, and although there are a couple of nifty ideas, the screenplay does not stretch things out enough. As a result, Final Fantasy feels too small in both scale and running length to shock and awe. Perhaps it is the kind of thing that would work better in theaters, but that doesn't feel like a good excuse for mediocrity. The best filmaking can engage a viewer even if watched on an iPod screen.

    Set in the distant future, man lives in space and Earth is an abandoned wasteland (thats new... ha ha). We follow a young ambitious doctor in her journey to find the answer to a crisis. Man is at war with a race of strange alien spirits, 'phantoms'. Who are they and what do they want? In her quest she is joined by others including an old lover (sort of).

    I think I may have simplified the plot a bit, but this gives you a general idea of what to expect. If done well, the story of Final Fantasy could be adventurous, intelligent and perhaps even emotional, and it is not. Though there is plenty of action, a lot of it feels dull and intertwining these scenes is a large amount of silly dialog, in which the subject matter is too much of science and not enough story. Last time I saw that happen was in Battlefield Earth with John Travolta's lines. The ending feels anti-climactic and with a somewhat silly plot twist.

    Final Fantasy is not a terrible film but to recommend it is a stretch. Whether or not the animation will be enough to captivate you or not is hard to say. Whether or not you'll find the story weak and unengaging, or adventurous and inventive is also hard to say. What I can say is that there are far better entries in both sci-fi and animation, If you really want a good film, try the Ghost in the Shell, not this.
An error has occured. Please try again.