User Reviews (46)

Add a Review

  • Since I was a child, I have had an obsession with all things vampires. Looking back now I wonder how much influence the 80's Little Vampire series had on me. I might be well over the 'suggested' age group for this movie but I couldn't wait to see it at the cinema and I wasn't disappointed at all!

    The Little Vampire is funny, with a great plot and well acted. Being also an obsessive Buffy the Vampire Slayer fan, I found the movie a refreshing alternative to gothic vampire style horror films which are currently plaguing the TV and movie industry at the moment. I can't honestly say how much a child may enjoy this film but if you have a spare nephew, niece or grandchild, borrow one and rent the film. I am just about to order my DVD copy of the Little Vampire tonight to join my collection of other vampire movies - Interview with the Vampire, Lost Boys, Dracula etc!
  • The Little Vampire is a delightful film about a little boy from America, Tony, who is teased and picked on at his new school in Scotland by the local laird's obnoxiously arrogant grandsons. He meets and befriends Rudolph, the youngest son of a family of charming vampires, who are trying to save themselves from Rookery, a vicious and unscrupulous vampire killer. It is rated PG for some mild peril, to which I would add that very young children would need to have some of the life and death issues explained. Both my sons, ages 11 and 6, just loved the movie -- enough that my six year old wanted to see it again, and I didn't mind taking him. The lessons my kids learned were mostly about friends coming in a variety of shapes and sizes, and the value of loyalty and dedication to a cause. There are enough plot twists and turns to keep you on the edge of your seat (at least the first viewing!), and although some of the dialogue is banal and predictable, some of it is deliciously witty. Last but not least, the costuming and special effects are wonderfully well done, and go a long way to making even some of the silly scenes very impressive. All in all, I would recommend it highly (to anyone who doesn't have trouble with the notion that vampires are not minions of Satan) as good, clean, amusing fun.
  • I was surprised at how much I liked The Little Vampire. It isn't exceptional, but in no way is it terrible. Some of the special effects are a little ropey, while I liked the story in general there may be those who may find the idea of having an American hero in a film set in Scotland a little contrived and I think it could have been a tad longer. That said, the costumes are very nice and the scenery is a delight, as is the cinematography. People may find it rather bleak, but I liked the bleakness, I think it suited the film very well. The film is well directed and written, with some witty lines and a very amusing running gag about... wait for it... vampire cows. The acting is also surprisingly good. Jonathan Lipnicki is really cute, Rollo Weeks is charming and bright, Richard E. Grant and Alice Krige are campy delights as the parents while Jim Carter is suitably unhinged as the slayer. Another thing, The Little Vampire is a rare film that doesn't patronise its audience. Overall, very enjoyable, while not being the best movie I have ever seen. 7/10 Bethany Cox
  • Just a few words that come to mind when describing The Little Vampire.

    This film is beautifully shot and at times looks like a Tim Burton film with the Blue filter over the screen. The costumes: Simply exquisite....they looked excellent.....nice Halloween costumes?!?!?!

    Rollo Weeks, in his break through film Debut, gives and exception performance as Rudolph, the Little Vampire...He is a clever, young boy with excellent acting skills.

    Lipnicki, of course is too cute, and shines and Tony the young boy with a heart for Vampires.

    The Scenery in this film actually steals the show...Beautiful landscapes, rolling hills, lush greens.....breath-taking...

    As an adult, I found this film funny, dramatic, and a good time for the whole family....

    8 out of 10
  • A really nice movie for kids with a good plot. A boy is fascinated by vampires and eventually meets some, becoming their friend and helping them against the vampire hunter and with some other problems.

    The only logical hole in the story is, why does anyone hunt such sympathical, harmless vampires ? Or even worse, why does the hunter in one scene try to kill a boy which is obviously not a vampire ?

    But the movie is really well made and worth your precious time, if you want to be entertained.
  • Lipnicki (little boy from Jerry Maguire) is an american boy in Scotland and in desperate need for a friend. His obsession with vamps just happens to lead him to his new friend...
  • After a week of nagging and cajoling I managed to persuade one of my sons to accompany me to The Little Vampire. To me the combination of vampires and Richard E Grant were irresistible. Not so my older son who thought it would be scary unlike my 6 year old rather hoped it would be! Richard E Grant plays the patriarch of the vampire family - in turns menacing, protective and nurturing. A bit low on that sexy look but this is a kid's movie, otherwise a performance that raised the standard of the movie. The villain of the piece is Jim Carter (who is also the villain the latest episodes of Scarlet Pimpernel). Unlike former vampire hunters Jim's appearance resembled a gypsy/wild man of the woods. He was the bogeyman of the film giving performance that he seemed to relish and the audience enjoyed. The other performance I enjoyed was the vampire son Rudolph (Rollo Weeks), an actor I hope we'll be seeing more of him in the future.

    My main crit is the vampires costumes (which looked splendid) the American couple dated them Shakespearian, which looked correct, but as the boy's age is 309 this calculates his birth era at around 1700 nearly 100 years later!! Given the fact that this is an aristocrat family would they really wear clothes a century out-of-style! I know it a children's film but! The plot is childish fun, the performances are good, the special effects were well done, and everyone seemed to laugh in the right places. Not very scary although a couple of scenes did have a little hand reach for mine. A thoroughly enjoyable afternoon's viewing.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    The Little Vampire (2000): Dir: Uli Edel / Cast: Jonathan Lipnicki, Alice Krige, Richard E. Grant, Rollo Weeks, Anna Popplewell: Is this junk actually fit for children? It seems like an introductory to the occult for children. Vampires are not a subject for kids films. Ironically enough the title seems to address racism using vampires as a symbol. A family moves to England where a boy befriends a vampire. This is where really bad special effects come in. A family of vampires struggle to maintain their existence from a villain who is the stupidest jackass since the Snow Plough Man in the equally dreadful Snow Day. He carries a cross that lights up and plays music. I guess a CD player is out of the question. There is a scene where vampires are sucking blood out of cows, which will eventually take flight themselves and drop manure on their targets. How Uli Edel went from directing Last Exit to Brooklyn to this is shameless. Is he being punished, or is he at the receiving end of a terrible joke. Jonathan Lipnicki as the boy is embarrassing. Alice Krige is a capable actress and has proved herself in greater films but here she plays the mother in a total cardboard role. Richard E. Grant plays the head of the vampire household. Rollo Weeks plays Lipnicki's new fanged friend. Anna Popplewell also makes an early appearance in this disgrace. Pathetic family film that should be buried in manure. Score: 1 / 10
  • A very winning cast, great location, superb kids' story to work with, good production make for some campy scariness for kids with entertainment for mom and dad as well. Charming little movie that appeals to the kid in all of us.The predicament of the cows really did make me laugh out loud.

    The acting by one and all was excellent, especially Richard E. Grant as the head of the vampire family. He brought a non-threatening, yet nerve wracking (well, for kids, anyway) presence to the movie. His charming powers over Mrs. Thompson were hysterical, and the entire cast did very well with this movie.

    One for the kids that mom and dad will enjoy sitting through, which is a rarity anymore, except for the likes of Shrek.

    Oh, and I can't omit Rollo Weeks, as The Little Vampire himself. He was so charming, so perfectly nailed the role of Rudolph. As well as the role for arguably the cutest kid in movies, Jonathan Lipnicki, as Tony Thompson. The crush Anna had on him was acted out adorably by Anna Popplewell, as well. There was just great acting all around in The Little Vampire.

    A job well done by all involved. This will make my list of movies to purchase just to share with my grandkids that someday I'll have to spoil. Campy, scary enough for the little ones and entertaining for their parents. What's not to like?
  • If you take this film as a family comedy, it is exeptable and works, a little. But if you take this film as a strict vampire film you may be dissapointed. The plot takes a kid and his family from San Diego to Scotland and the kid (played by Jonathan Lipnicki) starts to dream of vampires. Then, he meets them and befriends one of them and gets mixed up to get them turned into humans and to evade the evil vampire killer Rookery (Jim Carter).

    Kids will find this film funny, adults might even have a very slight liking to it, and I didn't hate it. But I did have 2 problems with it as a vampire film in general- 1, why would anyone think that Scotland looks like this. After seeing Trainspotting, you get a feeling of Scotland actually being the lowest of the low and that two boys in the film (Ed Stoppard and Jake D'Arcy) could concievably become Renton and Begbie over time. And 2, why would so much hate be put on a vampire killer. Sure in the film the vampires are targeted by him and the targeter is the villain like "Snow Day", but remember, one films Jim Carter is another films Sir Anthony Hopkins (Bram Stoker's Dracula) or James Woods (Vampires). Overall, it's OK. B-
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I saw a trailer for this family horror fantasy adventure and thought it looked like a fun film to try, so I did. Basically little Tony Thompson (Jonathan Lipnicki) is having constant nightmares about vampires, and he is also wanting to find a friend, and what he gets is a real young vampire Rudolph Sackville-Bagg (introducing Rollo Weeks). The two of them are inseparable, but their fun isn't going to last because his family: father Frederick (Richard E. Grant), mother Freda (Star Trek: First Contact's Alice Krige), sister Anna (Anna Popplewell) and brother Gregory (Dean Cook) are needing to find a magical stone to free them the curse of being a vampire, and drinking cow's blood. They need to find it fast, because on the lookout for their kind and the stone is vampire hunter Rookery (Jim Carter). Of course it comes to the night of the Attamon comet crossing the moon, and after a few distractions the vampires are freed of their curse, and the film ends with Tony being able to be human friends with Rudolph and family. Also starring Pamela Gidley as Dottie Thompson, Tommy Hinkley as Bob Thompson and John Wood as Lord McAshton. This is a film that will appeal both to the younger and older generations, filled with some good giggly moments, it a fun family film. Worth watching!
  • First, let me say that I was determined to dislike this film. Premise seemed childish, obviously aimed at children (and I ceased being one of those *MANY* years ago). Despite my best efforts, I found that I really liked this film. It's certainly not "Gone With the Wind", but it's good entertainment and definitely worth a viewing. At the end, I found myself feeling good about it, which is refreshing today. Even better, it gave me an evening's entertainment without profanity, sex or senseless violence. Lipnicky is (as always) cute and charming. I'd like to see more of Weeks on screen, but don't know if that's feasible as he's a British kid actor.

    Don't expect a deep message - it's not there. For a delightful evening's entertainment (with the ENTIRE family!) it's highly recommended. Just sit back and enjoy!
  • A long way from the great Ann Rice and Stephen King tales of the undead. I liked seeing the vamps played as the victim, having to deal with a crazed hunter of their kind, and watching their growing friendship with a mortal who can mysteriously aid in their quest to return to their own far off world. Totally enjoyable and, unlike Trix, not just for kids.
  • I loved this movie. I'm a sucker for movies that remind me of my younger years, and this is definitely one of them (well, seeing as it's made for kids, that's hardly surprising). The plot was good, the bad guy wasn't scary enough to give younger kids nightmares, but unlikable enough for the slightly older children not the care that he ISN'T too frightening. Wonderful costumes too.

    Did anyone notice the last name of the Vampires? Sackville-Bagg? It's freakishly close to that of the Sackville-Bagginses from Lord of the Rings...
  • I watched this on account of the TV-listings being too vague and featuring a somewhat loose translation(if it does capture the spirit)... yes, until the title card in the opening credits, I expected this to be My Friend Is A Vampire(on account of this being referred to as My Friend, The Vampire), an '88(the year, not the character of the second Dark Forces video-game... and yes, I admit that that was something of a stretch) film which I was ever-so-slightly more interested in. I decided to cut my losses and give this a chance. I have not regretted doing so. Granted, this is a children's film... very much so. A heavy reliance on the notion that all grown-ups are imbeciles and/or morons, material that no one above the age of ten could possibly find funny and writing that at times is utterly stupid and devoid of logic are all featured. The unendurable kid from Jerry Maguire has grown a handful of years older, not that you could tell(seriously, when he's 90, he's still going to look 4), and he's every bit as obnoxious, starring in this. The acting could stand definite improvement, for the most part. There is at least one bit of utterly unnecessary gross-out comedy, near the end, which lasts for minutes(if it isn't evident every second of those). Worst of all, this has a girl of eleven or twelve referencing To Have and Have Not, by delivering something much too close to Bacall's (in)famous line(but hey, maybe the kids won't get it, here's hoping). Check the Parent Guide for other censorship information. But while all that is certainly true, the film is far from unwatchable. The plot isn't too bad, and it develops reasonably well throughout(as well as makes fairly decent sense, for the genre, "family" film). The pacing is pretty spot-on, this moves just about as it's supposed to. The action parts are actually not too poorly done, and the character of Rookery is not without his cool moments. Some of the humor is downright funny, though it is mostly silly. The special effects vary, but tend to be on the positive side(and hey, it *is* an independent film). Richard E. Grant isn't bad at all. This really *could* be watched by just about anyone, and there is even a possibility that some of the generations/age groups may find themselves enjoying some of the same things in it. I recommend this to, well, anyone. There are many better films out there, and quite possibly better ones to watch with kids/parents, but you could certainly also do considerably worse. 6/10
  • ginge_mickey7 March 2022
    4/10
    Corny
    Warning: Spoilers
    The Little Vampire's biggest strength is Jonathon Lipnicki as an adorable young boy with good morals. The young twins make for decent villains although the vampire hunter is a little bit cartoonish. Though it turns unexpectedly sinister when he tries to murder Lipnicki's character.

    The main joke seems to be that there are Scottish people everywhere. The story is a little patchy and it's all very corny. Richard E Grant tries his best but appears slightly embarrassed to be there.
  • galaxychoco15 October 2013
    I though the movie was good and younger cousins enjoyed it they thought it was very good. I like the storyline and actors and pretty good so are the costumes I would recommend this to any child as they seem to like it. I myself not being a big fan of vampires didn't think the film was amazing but like it said its quite good to watch once in a while. What happens it Tony a little boy who has dreams about vampires and stuff one night when his parents are out a vampire flies through his window thinking that he is a vampire because he was acting like one and he asks him for help. What follows is a pretty good storyline with good acting I give this movie a 6 out of 10
  • The little vampire is not a serious film and you do have to accept that when you're watching it. It is genuinely funny and shows a new side to vampires. The child actors are pretty good as well as the adults. It is overall a rewatchable and charming film.
  • This film never gets old. Perfect family film. Good acting and just enjoyable
  • When I first saw the movie, I thought it was the cutest thing. I'm 17 years old and I'm not ashamed to say that I really like this movie. It had a cool plot that made it not so much of a kid movie. And it really shows you can make friends in even the weirdest conditions. Movies like this, allows you to sit back and forget about the stress of everyday and you can let the little kid inside you take over full of imagination and amazement. Really this is an excellent movie who need to escape without really escaping!
  • The little vampire is a thrilling story as a book and it makes a magical film. The script was full of witty jokes if you approached it with the right attitude. My name is Anna Popplewell and I appeared in the film as 'Anna' so it is no wonder I rate it well. My brother and sister (5) and (9) both loved it and so did an audience full of children at the test screening. It is true that children above 12 may find it a little babyish. There is magic the whole way through the film, not only as the friendship is formed, but also when it is tested. Any child who didn't enjoy this film should watch a little more closely
  • dig15 October 2002
    wow, This has to be the best kick back and enjoyed movie I have seen in a long long time. Being a 66 year old (tough Guy), I find most kids movies not to my liking. But this movie had me engrossed in the entire film.

    It was pure enjoyment to watch the movie and I recommend it to every one regardless of age.

    The wife goes along with me in my feelings about the pleasure of watching this movie. So people for sure rent it and if you have babies, buy it so when they are a little older they will be able to enjoy watching it as we did.
  • The Little Vampire is a cute family movie that kids will want to watch again and again. The story is about 8yr old Tony who has moved into a new house, new neighborhood, and a new country all together. He has nightmares every night about vampires and a magic amulet that the vampires loose. Tony believes his dreams are true and has trouble making friends because of his obsession. One night, while his parents are at a business party, a little 9yr old vampire named Rudolph spots Tony with fake fangs in his mouth. He flys in, hoping that Tony will protect him from a vampire hunter, only to find out that Tony isn't a vampire at all! Tony then finds out that his dreams are real and decides to help his friend look for the amulet...

    Although this movie is too "cute" for teens and "boring" for adults, The Little Vampire will put a smile on kids from the age 5-11. Stewart Little kid Jonathan Lipnicki adds the perfect touch to any kids movie, while Rollo Weeks (The Thief Lord) gets his start before making many more movies within the years that have past. I was flicking through the channels when i saw it on "abc family"'s 13 nights of Halloween. It was very cute and clever, even though it took me a few minutes to clue in since i only started watching it when Rudolph is in the fireplace after being a bat. The Little Vampire is a great movie the whole family can enjoy!
  • As a child I was a great fan of both the original Little Vampire book and the (badly dubbed) 1983 German television series, so I was very keen to see how this movie turned out. Sadly, this English-language version of the story has ditched the dark humour and wild fantasy of previous incarnations in favour of a more bland, Disneyesque reworking.

    The charm of the original lay in the development of the relationship between the little vampire and the mortal boy. In this film, they meet and become instant best friends, and then some tedious plot involving a passing comet takes over the storyline. Likewise, Rüdiger's family (or Rudolph, in this version) would be more interesting if they didn't accept his human pal almost instantly.

    So, if we ignore the fact it is a poor adaptation, how does the movie stand by itself? It is fairly good fun, but its linear plot, simplistic characters and acting from little Jonathan Lipnicki make it unsuitable fodder for adults. Kids will probably enjoy it, but it won't become an obsession.

    That said, much respect to the herd of flying vampire cows.
  • Back in the 80's, making Childrens Films was eaiser. There was no need for hypnotic techno background beats. Directors didn't include glitzy light shows whenever good and evil fought, Pokemon-style. Some of the best fantasy films come from the 80s and featured bad acting, horrible continuity, and rather icky special effects and cinamatography as a whole.



    "The Little Vampire" which stars mostly Jonathan Lipnicki, but also his little fanged friend Rollo Weeks, looks 10-20 years old but it actually a new release by New Line Cinema. And while for many this sounds like the ultimate rip of the dark children's fantasy based on some pretty famous books (at least in Europe), in actuality I think it's this that gives the film class.

    I cringe every time Jonathan's character says "dude" and cringe harder when Rollo lays out the vampric lore dribble on why they don't bite humans. (They dine on cows.) But it becomes harder and harder to dislike someone so charming as either boy as the chase for the medallion continues.



    The medallion is most of the time gaurded by Rookery who may be one of the most complete characters in the film. From the moment one sees his vampire hunting contraption looking like something from either "Mad Max" or "Tremors," those who are not children in the audience know this isn't going to be your typical kid's flick. The dark, creepyness continues throughout it's length, and someone in Oscar town might want to think on giving some nods for costume and art direction. Nothing beats the expressions on Rollo Weeks' face when he takes Lipnicki for their flights.

    Alas, the film lags and is generally one big chase. The vampires want the amulet, the vampire hunter wants the vampires, and Jonathan's parents just want thier son to be normal. A tricky thing a dark movie appropriate for children is. If they had added more action, it wouldn't have worked. And in my opinion, even with the scares present, it probably only worked half way.



    But the attempt looks sooo good.

    The Little Vampire: B
An error has occured. Please try again.