User Reviews (33)

Add a Review

  • This film is based on a great idea, but could have been done much better, perhaps with a larger budget. It is worth watching, and hopefully will open the door for other films to take on this subject.

    The issues dealing with the Kennedy's were a bit generalized and stereotypical and could have been developed more. To compete with other time travel films, I believe the technology could also be stepped up a notch.

    While I enjoyed the film, it left me wanting to see a more detailed and better version of it.
  • Sci-fi movies about time travel have always interested me and one about the JFK assination seem intriguing. The movie starts confusing in 1979 with mysterious government agents picking up a prisoner off a bus. Next is Nov. 22, 1963 in Dallas,Tx with Jackie Kennedy startled by an unexpected vistor. I won't spoil the plot, but it is not firmly grounded in theortical physics. However it does makes you wonder what would happened if JFK surived to have a second term. The best quote is when Robert Kennedy shows J.Edgar Hoover a picture of the F.B.I. director in comprimising situation,saying, "Nice dress you are wearing (in the photo). My wife has the exact same one in her closet." Unfortunately this intriguing movie has received little publicity.
  • A few good ideas can't save this uneven TV-quality movie about preventing the assassination of JFK. It skipped around in time (hah!) too much, the tone varied from sentimental to unintentionally funny, and the nudity & swearing felt shoehorned in for no good reason.

    I think there was a half-hour episode of the 80's "Twilight Zone" that dealt with this exact idea, but the best take that I've seen was the "Red Dwarf" episode 'Tikka To Ride', in which the crew accidentally saves JFK and botches things up in trying to ensure that the assassination occurs. It was a lot more entertaining (and an hour shorter) than this cheesy movie!
  • I have know about this movie since it was in production several years ago, thanks to IMDB, and eagerly awaited it's release. Then I hear it was premiered near where it was filmed, then that it was going directly to video. I finally found a copy at Hollywood video and got to see it.

    It is a really good story. A dreamers version of what might have been. I remember the day Kennedy was killed, saw Oswald killed live on TV that Sunday morning. I have visited the Sixth Floor and the grassy knoll and wonder that such a history turning event could have taken place in so small a place. This movie will strike a cord with those who think the world would be far better if JFK had survived. This movie should have had more $ and bigger stars but for what it had it did a REALLY good job of telling the story. I will not buy it, but I am going to watch it again before I take it back and dream of what might have been. It is a combination of the truth, the myth, and this story that will make you like this movie. Ralph Waite was so right for the part. So much more story could have been told, and should have been. Better than 13Days.
  • A writer should never direct his own movie................................................ Unless the script is actually good........This one is not.

    I won't give you an overview of the storyline, since that's been covered in this database entry.

    I'll start by saying that I know all too well that writing a good time travel story is not an easy task. "Time Quest: What if JFK had lived?" which also goes by the name "Second Chance" is a blend of melodrama, mixed with cliché and a touch of the occasional "HUH?!". My first reaction to the dual title was that this writer is so self absorbed that he couldn't decide on ONE movie title, because he simply admires every idea he has, so he simply *had* to call it both! If you see this, you'll know what I mean. A lot of story elements were put into this movie that I'm sure the writer thought would be "heart warming", but ended up being a moment to sit back and groan. Without spoiling anything, look for these wishy-washy moments in the movie if you decide to watch it:

    1) The time traveler dancing with Jacqueline. Uhm..... was this really necessary? As this unfolds, JFK looks as baffled as we viewers ARE.

    2) Robert Kennedy finding the fingerprint on the glass. Would there even BE a fingerprint if time had been altered and the traveler had `never been there'? hmmmm... Granted this movie is about as scientifically accurate as the anatomy of a Barbie doll....but come on!

    3) The nifty "elementary school artwork" scene. Wow! The government really DOES keep track of everything! Including those lousy pictures you colored in grade 3!! Wow! How powerful! How deep! How STUPID!

    And how about that line "Oh my sweet Jesus, we are at a crossroads here!" as he looks at the newly discovered picture! UGH! Cornball!!

    Ok, perhaps I'm being a bit harsh. But the fact remains that this movie was often comical in places that the writer never intended it to be -- taking away from any dramatic drive that even existed in this insipid flick. See this movie ONLY if you are like me, have a love of corny sci-fi and a maniacal need to pick them apart as you watch. Oh, and BELIEVE me, there is so much to pick apart in this movie that it would take me about 10 pages.

    My take on this movie is like this: It could have been better if the director would have taken more outside criticism and opinions from other people. Any person (other than the director I would think) could have pointed out the hokey moments, therefore allowing them to be removed and avoiding an embarrassment of a film such as this one.

    Maybe I'm wrong, but the sad fact is that this movie had potential --had it been done properly.

    2 of out 10 stars.
  • What a horrible movie. It was just above a community college level film. The acting was horrible. Why can't Bruce Campbell get some projects worthy of him?

    As to the premise that had JFK lived, things would have been wonderful, I simply had to gag. Kennedy is perhaps the most overrated person in history.

    Only Lady Diana approaches the level of a person being elevated to veneration when in real life they were next to worthless.

    The old slur against Hoover is brought out again. There is nothing aside from the last minute allegation of a convicted felon against Hoover to support the contention he was a transvestite. But the liberal community in Hollywood as agreed to run it again and again until it becomes accepted as truth. When you see any film doing this, it lets you know what a joke it is.

    Additionally the acting here was sad. Ralph Waite's performance as the time traveler bordered on being so saccharine that I had to check my blood sugar.

    Jackie Kennedy is shown as this wonderful paragon of virtue when most comment now on her actual vapidness. I wonder what trophy wife Onassis picked up in the alternate timeline.

    This movie was terrible.
  • What a mess! Tim in Pheonix is right- this is like a community college film project, but by someone who flunked out of community college. My only favorable comment is to the publicist who created the misleading VHS box to make this sound like an intriguing "alternate history" exploration. My hats off to you, buddy - you sure duped me! What I expected to be Oliver Stone meets Jules Verne was more like Oliver Hardy meets the "Hey, Vern!" guy. Too bad all the loose ends in this film weren't a little longer- I could have fashioned a noose and hung myself.

    Also includes the worst Kennedy impersonations you will ever hear, and actors supposedly portraying Lyndon Johnson, J Edgar Hoover, Walter Cronkite and Dan Rather who look and sound absolutely nothing like them. Didn't even try. To call the characters two-dimensional is to add a dimension.
  • I will watch just about any movie that has some element of time travel in it. However, when I saw the cover art work for the Time Quest video I was pretty sure this was not going to be a very good pic. Cheeeeezy. That was maybe a year ago, and this evening was the 3rd or 4th time I have watched Time Quest. So, first thought I have is don't judge this film by its cover.

    Time Quest leaves me with a feeling of melancholy for the opportunities lost. This is the film's finest quality. History is changed not only by the fact that the Kennedy's are not assassinated but by John and Bobby's knowledge of future events and their desire to use that knowledge to make a difference. No Vietnam and a space race that actually results in something.

    The movie has several other qualities I should mention. It has a sense of humor; it is sensitive; it moves back and forth over time so that the watcher is kept guessing; and most of the acting seems reasonable. I particularly liked the detail given to the time traveler's suit and to the screen he projects his images on, and there is a gripping slow-mo shot of LH Oswald not being assassinated.

    In a market where so few good sci-fi, let alone time travel, movies are made it seems a shame that more people aren't seeing this one.
  • TimothyP10 April 2004
    This was neither appallingly bad or terrifically good. The premise isn't bad (changing history), but the idea that the future would be incredibly rosy if JFK had not been shot is politically naive at best, and interfered with my enjoyment of the film.

    Barry Corbin is woefully miscast as Lyndon Johnson, and Bruce Campbell is shoehorned in as a director who gives us some framework for how the world has changed.

    Final analysis: good concept, ok script, ok direction, ok acting, politically a head scratcher. Rent it on a slow night and then forget about it.
  • Direct and writer Robert Dyke shows us a possible world in which John F. Kennedy did not die by an assassin's bullet, but lived to finish his presidency and his natural life. A scientist from (perhaps) our future, in which Kennedy died that day in Dallas, perfects time travel and returns to the Fort Worth, Texas of 1963. His arrival is timed to warn Jacqueline, John and Robert Kennedy of what awaited them in Dallas, and the effect that event would have on our country and the Kennedys. Using an intriguing and effective non-linear story telling technique, Dyke tells the story of that time-traveling scientist, played effectively by Ralph Waite, the Kennedys and a possible—and more promising—future.
  • I find the story intriguing, and that's the only positive thing about this movie that I can say. In short: The actors are obviously not talented and show a really bad performance, the sets are simple, the computer-animated scenes (Airplanes) are of a crappy quality, and most of all the directing is crap. I hope that no studio ever starts a Robert Dyke project again, cause this was one lousy job. Although he tried to hide his non-talent with some anti-chronological chaos in editing, this only confuses viewers. If it wasn't for that directing trick there wouldn't be anything left to think about while watching the movie.

    I saw that Robert Dyke not only directed the movie, but also co-wrote the story. I hope next time he writes a nice story, he hires a more talented screenwriter and takes the result to a big (professional) studio.

    About the story: It's about JFK, who is visited by a time-traveler (from the future of course) on the day he would have been assassinated in Dallas. He warns him for this assassination, so he survives that day. From that day on, new history will be written, and things change. The accent of the story from there lies more on the fascination of the Kennedy's for the mysterious time traveler than on the events that occur in the rest of JFK's life, and how different they are from how they are written in our current known history.

    It's a thrown away opportunity to deliver a solid B-movie, with a bigger budget and some more film time it could have been good!

    It's actually the kind of movie where after 20 minutes you say to your self: 'This sucks, I'm gonna watch something else, maybe Jerry Springer is on. Well okay, I'll watch another 5 minutes to see where the story goes'. And after that 5 minutes you watch another 5, and another 5 and so on. So the story stays intriguing until the dissatisfying end.
  • Ladies and Gentlemen, this is one of the sleepers that I never heard of that just blew me away. I absolutely loved this movie. I am a huge sci-fi, alternate history fan and the fact that I had never heard of this one is unbelievable. The what if scenario and the way it takes the characters from today and brings them into that time-line is so remarkable. It used a lot of thought about how certain actual events influenced particular people to strive for a different place in world events. It shows how a single incident can change a whole time line and how different it could have been. The Kennedy assassination is the one event in American history that has had such a fragmenting effect within this nation. The Vietnam War, LBJ, the space program, Nixon, civil rights, discontent and the huge gap between the parties all can be traced to that era. If your a history fan and love sci-fi, this is a must see. If you like, a great movie that takes you on a great journey then watch this movie. If you hated hi-budget movies like "Time Line" that don't come across, then watch this movie. It will take you on a real adventure and they spent only a fraction of the budget to get you there.
  • I really wanted to like this film, even if most of the references about the Kennedies meant nothing to a non American like myself. Funny, though, it is the second movie in two days that shows JFK surviving his assassination. However, the script was far too fragmented and implausible to be able to connect to me.

    The dislike for the film began when a time traveler confessed his affection towards Jackie Kennedy and ended when JFK disbanded the CIA and asked the Russians to join the American people in a quest to the stars. Yeah, like that is ever going to happen. I bet there still are some hillbillies somewhere accusing each other of being Coomunist before punching each other.

    Oh, and the reason I watched the movie was because Bruce Campbell has a role in it. He does a small and insignificant role. Don't repeat my mistake.

    All in all it was a worthy effort, but a disappointing result. One man, Kennedy or not, cannot change the world. Other people must join up and help him.
  • An old man travels back in time to save John Kennedy from being hilled, meanwhile in the new present day, Bruce Campbell is making a movie on another conspiracy that transpired on the day Kennedy was supposed to get shot. Low budget crap where none of the actors look or sound anything like who they're supposed to be portraying. It might be a good 'what if', but in execution it's extremely lacking and even the insanely great Bruce Campbell can't save this turkey that comes off as a sub-par episode of "The Outer Limits"

    My Grade: D

    Eye Candy: Shelley Marks gets topless
  • As a fan of television shows and movies that deal with the "What if?"/Alternate Universe type storylines, I found this movie very entertaining. The general story is that a man from the short term future (who was born on Nov. 22, 1963) invents a time machine to stop the Kennedy assassinations. The interesting thing about this movie, as compared to the hundred other similar stories about stopping the assassination is, they let the time traveler succeed. This story is truly a speculation of what may have happened it the Kennedy's were still alive.

    While, granted, this film does present a somewhat idealistic view of what might have been, I was just thrilled that half the movie wasn't spent trying to "repair the change in the timeline". Overall, I must say that I really enjoyed this film. It really reminded me of the videogame "Re-Elect JFK" The only real downfall to me was that it was just too short -- I would have liked further speculation. Also, the timeline in this story jumped around a bit, but that was just the style of the writer, and, by the end of the movie, everything made perfect sense.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Unless you are American or have detailed knowledge of that country's history, this film is best avoided. Initially attracted to it through a fascination for time-travel movies, I ended up disappointed and confused. The use of colour and black and white does not correspond to the periods in time as I imagined initially and I ended up totally confused as to what time one was in. The premise for the film is interesting but the story itself, to me at least, was far from entertaining. There's also use of bad and crude language which I abhor in films generally, unless there is a very good reason for it. Quite frankly, I am not particularly interested in what JFK did or did not do with Marilyn Monroe ..doubtless, those people who are interested in this sort of thing will find some pleasure in the work. I know it is not easy to make time-travel films, a certain logic needs to be respected, but if in addition the story line is confusing for the spectator, there is no hope of salvation. Admittedly if I knew more about American politics at the time, fewer events would have passed me over but as a European, my interest in this particular part of American politics is limited - and even had I myself been a US citizen, I would never never have voted for a Democrat !
  • I grabbed this movie out of one of those value bins. I think I paid about five bucks for it. That should have been my first clue as to what I was getting. The movie sucked big time... I fell asleep twice on it and just what the hell was this movie about??? Daddy Walton looked like he needed a drink... They could have found some better Kennedy brothers. I was let down because I like the whole time travel concepts in films. There were a lot of missing pieces and they asked us, the viewer, to pretty much fill it in. Run as fast as you can from this movie or face the raft of getting sucked in by the VORTEX OF BAD FILMS. Should have had some Marilyn Monroe sex scenes, now that would have been a flick...
  • Warning: Spoilers
    The movie asks the question, "What would of happened if the Kennedy brothers didn't get assassinated?" It then answers it in the most hokey and corny fashion. Now I am a big Kennedy lover, but it was really ignorant to believe the whole world would be coming up roses. The plot includes a private chat to the Kennedy men about their affairs. The man who time travels to save their lives has to sacrifice his, so the Kennedy boys makes sure they figure out who this guy was (as he was a child at this time in history) and he gets rewarded, because those Kenndys always look after their own and those who help them.

    The movie is amusing and somewhat enjoyable even though it had my stomach churning at times. The plot premise is interesting which is why the movie is popular in a sub-culture way. The actual plot, acting, and dialouge is of the bad indie variety which is why the movie is less popular than what you would expect.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Being a big Bruce Campbell fan, i'm gonna get just about anything he appears in. After finding this tough to find gem i was pleasantly surprised to find this was way better than i expected.I especially liked the sci-fi time travel aspect with the well used past, present, future editing. I also thought it was cool how they weren't shy about exploring the alternate universe thing( avoiding vague suggestions and following through with the interpretations.) The story line was provocative and thought provoking and fairly well acted for a mostly unknown cast, except Larry Drake perfect for the J Edgar Hoover role, throw in Bruce's normal charm and you get a deep story with a new twist on a very old what if. mostly underrated and well worth your 90 mins. Good for the deep thinker, and great for the Bruce Campbell fan.
  • I was pleasantly surprised by this movie, it was actually pretty entertaining. I confess that I rented it because of the picture of the beautiful Caprice Benedetti on the cover, usually when I rent a movie I haven't heard of because of a beautiful woman on the cover, it's not surprisingly, not very good. Parts of this were kind of cheesy, but it was made with a lot of heart, and had a good story, do yourself a favor, if you see this one at the video store, give it a look, you'll be glad you did.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I am not a JFK aficionado, but I do love time travel flicks and this one was definitely better than average. JFK-History fans will love this movie like it was their Bible! I especially love the way that the 'new and improved' JFK saw the vision of man moving out among the stars and invited Russia to join the US and do it together... A very Utopian view of the future.

    Even if you aren't though, and you appreciate the accomplishments of JFK or the Kennedy family in General, you'll love this film as it pays homage to their lives and fixes all the wrongs in their history, showing us a perfect world later for the changes.

    Strongly recommended, better than the box cover appears. It even had a pretty decent budget and a great cast!
  • Warning: Spoilers
    (I am not sure if what I've said has spoilers or not, so I checked the box, just in case...)

    Wow, this movie ended up getting to me.

    First of all, I think the script writer and director did their homework. So many of the details of that day in Dallas, of Jack and Bobby and Jackie, they had SPOT ON. The Abraham Zapruder parts - as small as they were - were amazingly correct.

    The idea of going back and stopping the JFK assassination has been around a good long while. It is probably THE moment millions of people would want to change. Me included.

    So much changed that day in Dallas.

    Even today, it seems like there was so much more that America could be, could do, and could inspire, in us and in the world. So much was cut short, and so many live with that loss.

    This movie doesn't go into what JFK and RFK would have done (except for Viet Nam and the CIA). And I think leaving that open was the right decision. But even just a world without Richard Nixon as President would be a better world to have lived in. Without Reagan and his voodoo economics that have sold the USA to the highest bidders and the economic rapists - that would be a better world to not have gone through (and that rape isn't over yet). The turn to the right surely would have been forestalled, if not pushed back forever. America has been in demise since the end of the 1960s, and that did NOT have to happen. It's good that the rest of the world has increased in prosperity. It was NOT necessary that the USA slid so far.

    I thought the cuts made in time were especially spot on.

    I literally teared up near the end of the movie, just being reminded of what we lost that day, how horrible it was, and the pain that reached round the world.

    For such an obviously low-budget movie, I thought this was terrifically well done. The atmosphere was terrific, and capturing the spirit of Jack and Jackie, plus Robert - it was really a trip down memory lane, and three such tragic figures on OUR history.

    If there are parallel time lines - alternate histories - those with Jack and Bobby not getting murdered I think certainly have better histories for the USA from 1963 till now.

    If I myself could go back and change that day, I would - in a heartbeat.

    I hope that someday the director reads this review and realizes how much of a cord he struck with me - and I think with many others who will someday see this small but very wonderful movie.
  • "Timequest" is a film for Sci-Fi fans, Conspiracy Buffs, Bruce Campbell fans, and anyone who wants to enjoy an all around intellectually stimulating and entertaining film.

    Robert Dyke's (who also made Moontrap) "Timequest" is both imaginative, intellectual, and advanced in it's formal composition.

    It investigates the question: "What would our world have become if JFK had survived that day in Dallas?" The story begins in the Presidential Suite of Fort Worth, Texas where JFK and his wife Jacquie are being housed- the day before JFK would be shot in Dallas. The plot centers around a man who has discovered time travel, and- motivated by his obsession for Jacquie after seeing her mourn her husbands death- he decides to go back and warn the President of the impending attack, and subsequent effect it would have on history and, in turn, the reality of the future (which he didn't think was too sh*t hot).

    Appearing from nowhere, having infiltrated the Presidential suite with the President inside unbeknownst to the Secret Service, sh*t starts to hit the fan. But the mystery man succeeds in settling everyone down by showing them a holographic video of JFK and his brother RFK's assassination. The President- considering the circumstances- heeds the threat seriously, and has his brother flown in to witness it all for himself. Robert is skeptical of the whole situation, but when he sees himself lying dead only 5 months later, he opens an ear.

    They ask the man why he is doing all of this. He tells them how he was born on the day that JFK died; and how, growing up, he fell in love with Jacquie as she stood strong in wake of her husbands violent death. He also mentions that he hated the state of the world in his time, and thus sought to change it, even if it meant his demise (well....his demise in THAT (his future) form, as he would possibly not be born, if he is successful).

    The Time Traveler warns the two men, not only about their future assassinations, but also of the second assassination attempt that would follow- the attempted assassination of JFK's character (in Clinton-esque fashion). Taking the warnings to heart the group waits for the exact moment of JFK's original assassination to occur- the moment history will change- denoted by the Traveler ceasing to exist.

    As they wait for this moment to pass, the traveller asks only one thing- to dance with Jacquie. This moves her and she becomes obsessed with the man, as he disappears from their lives...in one sense anyways.

    With history changed, the attempted assassins are caught (on the grassy knoll); JFK leads a long and fulfilling life; the CIA is dismantled; RFK continues his fight against organized crime; JFK forms and alliance with the Soviets to travel to the moon together; we see where people like J. Edgar Hoover, George Bush, Bill Clinton and Arthur Zapruder end up; John and Jacquie have another child; and Jacquie takes up art, painting the man- the traveller- whom she longs to meet (the her time version of, at least).

    The Kennedy's always pay back those who help them. Considering this, John and Robert make all efforts to find the man in his younger form. All they have to go on is a fingerprint the man left on a glass.

    Robert is a little more paranoid, though. He feels it may be necessary to find and kill the child, as he may go on to invent time travel, which would-be assassins could use to go back in time and kill JFK- again (kinda).

    They look at all baby's born Nov 22, 1963, but then realize that his labour could have been brought on by the trauma of JFK's death and thus widen the range of their search. Eventually they do track him down. He's a petty criminal and artist.

    JFK's son (who was born only as a result of his future self's intervention) takes him under their wing and provides him with a place, and the supplies he needs to thrive as an artist. The young man get's to meet the people his non-existent future self saved, and sees the wonderful portrait Jacquie painted of the man.

    There is also a tangent(and I believe this element of the story is thrown in SOLELY to include BRUCE CAMPBELL- because it seemed relatively irrelevant to the whole story) in which Bruce Campbell plays an Oliver Stone-esque conspiracy theorist/ filmmaker who catches a whiff of what happened that November 21st at Fort Worth- but draws the most ridiculous conclusions from it, and ends up making a film that is more erotica than it is a conspiracy film.

    I suppose this was meant to act as the character assassination attempt prophesized by the Traveler before he disappeared. But it doesn't really work effectively like that. It doesn't really hinder the flow of the story either, though. In fact, it is really quite funny in it's reflexivity- and Campbell is always golden.

    The structure of this film is really quite complex. It plays with time and space in a way that is by no means subtle. They are constantly interweaving different spaces and times together. The "based on a true story" past with the imagined past, flashbacks and flashforwards. Different realities- real and imagined- are all knotted together into a complex puzzle (compositionally speaking). It does take a little bit of labour to understand, and for this reason I think it has been overlooked by many viewers and thus relegated to the realm of sci-fi obscurity.

    It really is an incredible film- both story and plot-wise. I urge you all to check it out, it deserves to be watched.

    Remember... "The futures last hope is the past." 8 out of 10.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I feel the scenes are presented in the optimal order, and appreciate the repeat of some scenes (with a different camera angle). This helps to intrigue the viewer, while also making digestible the complexity of the story. Four examples of repeated scenes are the removal of a young man from a prison bus, secretly to be greeted by Marine One, the US Presidential helicopter; the materialisation of a whitish-haired male time traveller in a protective suit into the Fort Worth hotel suite where Jackie Kennedy is preparing herself for a motorcade in Dallas; the mustering of Robert Kennedy into this hotel suite; and the cylindrical haze that envelops Robert & Jack Kennedy into a private audience with the time traveller. Each instance of such a scene, allows a chain of other related scenes to be introduced to the viewer.

    The ephemeral popping into existence of the time traveller in that hotel suite conveys information into the minds of those there present, while leaving no material trace. Robert is shown carefully handing to him a glass of orange juice for a toast, clearly intending to identify the man from his fingerprints. The dance scene is important, to demonstrate hand to hand touch with Jackie, who transfers oil and sweat from her own hands, which allows for a fingerprint upon the glass that persists beyond the forewarned dematerialisation of the man. The man's boyhood crayon drawing of her seems out of Jack's hands to have dematerialised by the end of the dance, shortly preceding the vanishing of the time traveller himself.

    The information conveyed is what we recognise as history in our own timeline - that without the evanescent encounter, Jack was fated to have been shot dead at 12:30 p.m. that day in Dallas, and Robert to be shot dead five years later in Los Angeles - and the conspirators to these crimes. However, the time traveller also privately shares misgivings about Jack's infidelities' leaving him and his brother open to blackmail, and about the Vietnam War that his successor was to have escalated. He also reveals his own (possibly premature) birth was fated to occur upon this day of national anguish, but declines to identify himself further.

    The result is a changed timeline between 1963 & 2002, which indeed seems superior to our own, in which Jack expands his 1962 vision of a man on the Moon, with an overture to the Soviet Union to join the Americans in founding a lunar colony and exploring space as a united humanity, setting aside the nuclear arms race and the Cold War. In 1979, the boy who was to have invented time travel in later life, is recognised by his fingerprints, his age & an identical crayon drawing of Jackie from his boyhood, and diverted into a patronised career as a painter. In 2002, with Jack's death in old age, a son James, whom he was set never to have conceived, invites the painter, now in his late thirties, to view a portrait painted by Jackie of the old time traveller with whom she danced. The painter sees his own eyes as if in a mirror!
  • The world premier showing of this film, made here in Michigan, was truly a very entertaining experience. The plot took us into a world that might have been if the assasination of John Kennedy was foiled by information given to Jackie that morning in November, 1962 by the appearance of a time traveler from the future. His motives as you would believe would be to better the world with the Kennedy leadership, when in fact,he had a very different and personal reason. This film kept me glued into every twist of the story which went from the past, to the present with JFK and the present without him. It was Larry Fox (Evil Dead) beautiful, sensual yet eerie sets to director Robert Dykes visual direction and creative imagination ( he also wrote the script) that kept me pulled in and totaly fascinated. I don't know how or when this film will be distributed but I am hoping it will be given a excellent chance to be viewed and enjoyed by all who love science fiction with both romantic and historic interest.
An error has occured. Please try again.