User Reviews (277)

Add a Review

  • Warning: Spoilers
    So the movie starts with the main character escaping from the hole. She's interviewed by the police so they can find out what happened. She gives her story for maybe the first quarter or so. She blames her jealous friend for setting up this trap that presumably ended up in the deaths of three other characters. Then the second quarter starts and we hear the friend's side of the story, which is almost the opposite of what we just saw. The movie got interesting here. We've got an established mystery, we don't even know the end result of the mystery or what happened in the hole, but we've got to figure out why it happened and go from there.

    Then the movie takes a disappointing turn and simply continues on with the friend's side of the story. It turns out he's telling the truth and the movie doesn't even try to convince you otherwise. So it ends up not being some mystery that unfolds where two people tell opposing stories, it's just one story, and the whole first quarter of the movie didn't matter. The entire second half continues on with this until the very end, where I was hoping that maybe there'd be some kind of twist, but no. Nothing. We just accept the facts that we were bluntly told a quarter way through, that the main character is a psychopath and it was she who set the whole thing up.

    The movie is very early 2000s and it comes off as laughable a lot of the time. Sometimes the acting can be good, but often times it isn't. The score sucks because of how dated it is, and the script can be pretty cringey too. Early on I started to think that this movie would suck because of all these things, but then I thought maybe this interesting mystery would unfold, and the writing would save the film. That doesn't happen. It's entertaining enough, and I guess it's worth watching if it's on TV or something, but otherwise there's no real point in watching it. The story is so clichéd you won't be missing much.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This movie is basically a well made thriller, that has an original concept but in the end still falls flat as a thriller, due to some poor, mostly non-linear, storytelling.

    Really the main problem for me regarding this movie was its storytelling. It has a non-linear storyline, with flashbacks and such. It also tells the story two times, only from a different source. It makes the first part of the movie feel kind of redundant afterward. Sure its good for some twist but unfortunately at the same time these twists are too obvious and not quite surprising enough. And why do movie makers keep giving away parts of the ending of the movie already at the beginning? I'll never understand why they do this. It's a killer for the rest of the movie, since you already know who survived and who didn't. It completely takes most of the tension away and you know certain events have to occur in the movie to add up to the ending of it, which was already shown in the beginning. It's mostly a common thing in British movies. One they should very quickly abandon this way of storytelling in the movie business.

    This movie makes the cop seem like a bunch of narrow minded morons. They could had solved the entire mystery already halfway through the movie and while watching this movie it makes you wonder why they didn't. I hate it when they make the police seem like stupid narrow minded persons, mainly because its bad for the credibility of the entire movie.

    The characters are good and so are the actors that portray them. Only thing is that they used too old persons to play the youngster. I hate it when man play boy-parts. It's not credible. The only one who seemed to have the real right age at the time was Keira Knightley

    I appreciate what the movie tries to succeed and it times it comes really close. For most part the atmosphere of the movie remains good and consistent. It tries to make the movie a mysterious one with lots of twist and character changes in it. However most of the twist are too obvious with as a direct result that this movie isn't the most surprising thriller around.

    In the end it simply doesn't all add up. The movie remains too vague in certain areas and doesn't deliver a satisfying enough ending. It makes you wonder why this should be the ending. It seems like a silly and unlikely thing that the Thora Birch character would get away with this all, after already confessing it moments ago to Dr. Philippa Horwood. The movie leaves too many questions and improbabilities.

    A movie that had way more potential and in the end comes too short of becoming a completely good, memorable and credible thriller.

    6/10

    http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/
  • The movie concerns a bunch of adolescents formed by Thora Birch , Desmond Harrington , Kiera Knightley and others who stake to shelter in a bunker .

    They're closed up and then terrible events originate .

    Although the happening develops itself in locked place the film is not tiring .

    The yarn mingles emotions , violence , shocks , thriller , the suspense doesn't fail and that's why it's bemusing and isn't boring .

    Acting by Thora Birch is awesome , she was paid a high salary due to her recent acclaimed role in American Beauty (1998) . The beautiful and very young Kiera Knightley -she war 15 when this movie was shot- is ready as a future main star (Pirates del Caribbean, curse of the black pearl) and even she has a brief first nude scene . And Desmond Harrington (Ghost ship) is cool .

    The film has relation to last group of English movies developed in shut and strange stages as the Bunkers or trenches , for example : ¨Deathwatch¨ and ¨the Bunker¨.

    The movie has a pretty twisted plot and the final storyline has extraordinary and fascinating surprises. The motion pictture was well directed by Nick Hamm (Killing Bono , Godsend , Talk of angels) . Flick will appeal mystery and emotions fans.

    Rating: 6/10 Good . Well worth watching
  • Liz stumbles towards her boarding school, bloodied and shaken up after being missing for several days. She tells the police psychologist of a party in a hidden bunker planned for her and three friends by her friend Martin. However when Martin doesn't return things turn nasty in the bunker. However when Martin is found by the police he tells a very different story. Slowly the true events are retold in flashback.

    I saw the trailers for this and assumed it was another teen slasher – I didn't even know it was set in Britain until someone told me. I think the trailer is an example of a studio unsure of how to sell a product and just plumping for the lowest common denominator. However this film rises above that. Instead of being a slasher or a horror it is a thriller with a horror twist. This makes it better – it may not be as scary as you expect but it is a better story and is creepy rather than schlocky!

    The cast are good despite being young. The weaknesses come in with the adult cast – especially the cops who have clearly watched too much Sweeney! However the teens are good and are more than the sort of fodder that is put in teen movies.

    Overall this is not what you expect. But it is better than you'd think. The thriller story is gripping because you're not sure what happened in the bunker until the end and I had questions answered as I went. Not great but certainly better than another teen slasher movie.
  • The Hole begins slowly and very standardly, but unlike most genre films, it picks up pace after 40 minutes then accelerates towards a smashing ending. Well okay, the ending itself wasn't a great surprise, but I found it satisfying in a B-grade kind of way.

    The premise of Hole is pretty mundane. The idea of a group of teenagers going into an old abandoned building or structure for a lark is a stock standard story opener for hundreds of B-grade horror flicks. But then Hole becomes interesting by the re-telling of events from different characters' individual points of view in a manner reminiscent of the 1950 British gem ‘The Woman in Question'. Just who is telling the truth?

    The final third of Hole rockets along and the film becomes genuinely frightening. I was especially impressed with the way repercussion of actions and in-actions are graphically shown and not glossed over as so many genre films have a habit of doing.

    Hole is not a great film. The acting from the five teenagers is a cut above average, but the direction is pretty heavy handed and not very imaginative. Overall I found Hole a nicely satisfying and genuinely frightening B-grade experience which proves the old adage that says the worst monsters are human beings. It also shows that modern thriller/horror genre films doesn't always have to rely on lashings of special effects and supernaturalism to tell a story effectively.

    6/10
  • xredgarnetx8 February 2006
    Warning: Spoilers
    THE HOLE tells the tale of four British public (here it would be prep) school students messing around in an old bomb shelter. They accidentally get locked in. After several days, they begin to die off one by one. The lone survivor, played by Thora (GHOST WORLD) Birch, relates her horrific tale as the movie unfolds to investigators, including a doctor (Embeth Davidtz) who follows Birch through her recovery and eventually takes her back down into the shelter. A fellow student who led the four to the shelter is suspected of having locked them in, but has disappeared. This low-budget effort is less a horror flick than a psychological thriller, sort of HIGH TENSION without the barbed-wire baseball bat, although it has its share of grue and contains a couple of highly squeamish moments, the worst involving a pre-PIRATES Keira Knightley. It may remind some of SAW, and I would say rightly so. The end is a shocker, and Birch acts up a storm. Made about five years ago, this is some nasty stuff.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Taking place at a private British prep school, a group of rich kids decide it would be a fun idea to go and hide out in an abandoned bomb shelter to escape a field trip - party for a few days away from everybody, and have an all around good time. Among them are hesitant Liz (Thora Birch), her crush, Mike (Desmond Harrington), Geoff (Laurence Fox), and his girlfriend, the wild Frankie (Keira Knightely). But their little "vacation" from the world turns into a nightmare when the four of them become locked inside with no way of escaping, and each of them begin to turn on each other in desperation and hysteria.

    Quite different from your typical teenage thrillers (and a lot more intense), "The Hole" is a little British movie that doesn't seem to have gotten much attention, at least here in the United States, despite some of the core characters being played by American actors (most notably Birch). The movie's premise is essentially the entire cabin fever-sort of scenario, placing a group of snobby, manipulative teenagers in a confined underground bunker, and lets them loose as they struggle for survival. This idea has been done before, but the characters/actors and the setting in this film alone make it stand apart from the bunch.

    The casting is probably the strongest point here. We've got the wonderful Thora Birch ("American Beauty") leading the film, Desmond Harrington ("Ghost Ship", "Wrong Turn") playing her romantic interest, and a quite young Keira Knightely playing a wild party girl. Embeth Davitdz also is worth noting, playing a detective trying to solve the horrible aftermath of what occurred in the bunker. Overall, the acting is really refined here and even the young performers are believable (I wouldn't be surprised if was was the film to initially get Keira Knightely out in the spotlight).

    Aside from the solid acting, there's the claustrophobia factor, and the damp, cold atmosphere that emanates from each scene within the old bunker. A non-linear time line is used here, which switches between current time and flashbacks - the flashbacks being the recounting of what happened in the hole from when the idea was first initiated, to when the underground bunker became a bloodbath. The transitions here were a little confusing at times, which was a problem for me, the placement of them at times made the film seem a little choppy. I will admit, however, it does keep you guessing as to what the real truth of the matter is, which is definitely a good thing.

    I'd also like to note that this movie is not what it may appear to be- it's much more of a psychological thriller than flat out horror, so that may be a disappointment to some horror fans. If you're expecting some sort of slasher flick, steer clear of this one. I, however, love psychological thrillers, so this was enjoyable to me. The film's conclusion is probably the biggest punch in the gut, and its revelations are nonetheless nihilistic and savage - it's not a film that ends on a happy note by any means.

    Overall, "The Hole" is a dark, cruel thriller that keeps you guessing throughout. It's surely not your typical teenage-thriller, and I applaud it for that. It's a film that adults and teenagers can enjoy equally, whilst most of the teen thrillers on the market today lack intelligence and diversity. The plot is smart and the story's presentation is harrowing and engaging. My only real complaint is the transitioning here, but otherwise, this is a solid thriller. Definitely recommended if you can get your hands on it, it seems to be a little difficult to find here in the States, despite its DVD release. 7/10.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    **WARNING - SPOILERS AHEAD**

    Short version: this movie sucks. Long version: as somebody else wrote, the hole is in the plot line. Or better, there are lots of holes, but mainly:

    a) Martin has a perfect alibi, yet he's the suspect from the beginning and nobody believes him. But, since they find him (dead) with the key, he MUST be guilty. And Liz must surely be rather strong, if she can plunge him in the river so easily. And rather quick, to put the key in his pocket without anybody (in the audience) noticing. Martin dies only a few yards away from Liz's house, but no one seems to care about that.

    b) Hello? Did anybody tell the psychologist there were THREE dead bodies in the cell, one of which with his head crushed? How come the police acts as if nothing happened and no one ever talks about it? How come Liz was never questioned SERIOUSLY about these deaths? The first version of the story ends with everybody coming out of the hole happy and smiling, but the psychologist seems to believe it.

    c) the hole is abandoned since WW II, but there still is electricity. The hole has an emergency exit which can be locked from outside, in order to make it completely unuseful. The door of the hole has a glass part, but nobody tries to break it.

    d)The door key magically appeared in Martin's pockets some time before, because he won't let us know who gave it to him, and if we knew it, that would mean that someone else knew about the existence of the hole, and that would have made it too complex for the writers.

    e) Nobody in the school noticed that the boys didn't go to Wales, and their families didn't notice they didn't come home. It took at least three days to understand that there was something wrong.

    f) Liz is so convincing when she talks, that everybody instantly believes her: see the ending.

    g) Think about this: when Liz came out, the door was OPEN. If Martin was on holiday, who the hell could open it without a key?

    I think that's enough to explain why the movie doesn't work.

    A thriller is a dangerous game: if you want to play it with the audience, you must be sure you can handle it. As many famous screenwriters said, you've got to take the story and shake its foundations: if it "survives", you've probably got a good movie coming on. This one crumbles quite miserably.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Four snotty rich kids at a prep school in England want to get out of a field trip to Wales, where they would have to eat "fish paste sandwiches" and be otherwise uncomfortable. They also don't want to get out of the trip by just returning home over the school break. Two are male friends, Mike Steel (Desmond Harrington), son of a rock star, and Geoff Bingham (Laurence Fox), and two are female friends, Elizabeth Dunn (Thora Birch) and Frances Almond Smith (Keira Knightley). Frances and Geoff have had an intimate relationship, although any relationship between them seems very tenuous, and Elizabeth has had a crush on Mike for a long time; Mike was otherwise going out with another girl, but she had just dumped him. One of them knows, or knows someone who knows, the perfect "getaway" spot, secluded and private, just right for promoting an intimate, extended weekend of partying--an old war bunker deep underground in the middle of a forest. The bunker is accessed via a circular, thick steel door, and is lined with thick reinforced concrete. The four end up trapped in the bunker, with the door locked and no way to get out, for at least 10 days. Who locked them in and why? How will they get out?

    If you're someone who only likes straightforward plots, traditionally happy endings and films depicting "facts" that are close to what you believe to be true about the actual world, you're best advised to avoid The Hole. If you instead do not mind, or even prefer, circuitous, twisted tales with strong fantasy elements (in this case primarily to enable what amounts to a parable) and fairly nihilistic endings, you may find much to love here. Reflecting the film's overall ambiguity, The Hole resides in a gray genre area between thriller, psychological horror and a straight-ahead drama. The first half hour or so is much more straightforward, and for me, the film was cruising along at about an 8 for at least that length of time. But as it progressed and things became much more bizarre and "evil", my score gradually rose, with the extended climax being a firm 10 for me. So my rating on this one is more of an average.

    The plot, from a screenplay by first time (and only time so far) scripters Ben Court and Caroline Ip, based on a novel by Guy Burt, is unusual for being told primarily from unreliable characters' perspectives. We learn most of the story through the testimony of a victim--Elizabeth, and a primary suspect, Martyn Taylor (Daniel Brocklebank), who may in fact be a friend of Elizabeth's. Their accounts change as the film progresses, often framing different characters as victims and perpetrators, and the bulk of what we see on screen are depictions of these changing accounts. Thus we see some "repeating" material. It's important to show parts of the story again as the supposed facts about the story change.

    Stemming from this, it's easy to see that the performances are quite good. Most characters undergo subtle alterations for the different instantiations of the story, and the four principals--Birch, Harrington, Fox and Knightley--adeptly transform themselves, aided also by their clothing, hair and makeup.

    Court and Ip cleverly do not change the scenario as much as you might expect after the first couple variations. It keeps you on your toes as to just who the perpetrator was, but also enables a surprising and in-depth exploration of the psychotic personality and motivation behind the "lock-in"--whoever the perpetrator was (and I certainly won't reveal the film's answer here), they were clearly somewhat insane. We're also led to be skeptical about the material that's relayed from an ostensibly third-person point of view. It's never clear for most events just what is meant to be "objective" and true versus what is still the potential fantasy of the storyteller. Personally, I love that kind of ambiguity. Some others do not like it so much.

    The Hole is also a bit of an exploration of spoiled kids. All of the main characters are manipulators who are used to getting whatever they want. They all seem to have an attitude that their intellect is far superior to almost every one else, and thus they're entitled to whatever they desire, as well as justified in whatever it takes to get it--that's a classic disposition of many criminals, and not a few business leaders, politicians, Internet geeks and so on. It's notable that when the students' parents appear (which is very seldom), they are distant and mostly dissociated from their offspring, who have come to rule the roost as far as we can tell. The investigators trying to piece together the case come to know this, although they never directly state as much, but the performers give very subtle clues to their complex realizations as the story goes on. We can see them also gradually losing hope that they'll be able to properly sort the events out and reveal the truth.

    The Hole can be seen as a parable about how far some may go to get what they want, as well as how far co-conspirators may go before they try to divorce themselves from events gone wrong (there are clues throughout the film that other characters had various levels of knowledge and involvement). It's also an exploration of what makes some go as far as they do and what makes conspirators play along. At the same time it comments on the bewilderment of "outsiders" trying to figure out how some horrific event developed. A lot of the answers are appropriately ambiguous. Under the guises of the subtexts, as well as on a more visceral surface level, the film is a great success.
  • The Hole isn't that bad a film, its just that it lacks the components which a good thriller/suspence/mystery should have.

    The Hole, starring Thora Birch, is a suspence/mystery and is about a group of high-school teenagers who become stuck in an old, World War 2 tunnel, called 'the hole'. The group of four decide to camp down in the hole for a few days to wag a school geography camp and have a good time. However, all goes wrong and the four become stuck in the hole for 18 days, deprived of air, food and water.

    The suspence lies in not knowing exactly how they became stuck in the hole and who's to blame for their dire situation. The plot structure is based around Lizzy's escape, while she continues to have flashbacks of the event itself. However, different flashbacks occur at different stages of the film, which leaves the viewer never really knowing the exact truth until the end.

    If you've watched your fare share of suspence type mystery thrillers, then you should be able to sum this movie up pretty quickly and be able to guess basically what's going on. The plot and plot structure arn't terribly original and I never really found myself becomming attached or captivated by what was going on. The film lacks character development and you never really become attached to the characters to the point were you intensely care what's happening to them. Thora Birch's performance is dissapointing and not terribly convincing. She's good, but no where near her brilliance when you compare this performance to her roles in American Beauty and Ghost World.

    The Hole is overall dissapointing and never really draws you in like a good mystery thriller will. I give it 6/10.
  • The first trailer for this film showed to be a gruelling film about humans trapped in a dark, confined space, slowly withering away. The second trailer pitched this movie as some sort of repellent formulaic teen horror film. It was the first trailer that had been touted since last autumn in the UK that intrigued me enough to see it.

    Having watched the film I was disappointed as the film failed to deliver what had been promised in either trailer. What I saw was a bland movie that seemingly doesn't know what it's target demographic is. I am assuming that it wanted to be a psychological horror, but the film is so lightweight that it appears to have been written with twelve-year-olds in mind – which isn't necessarily a bad thing. However, the film is visually aimed at adults, with sex, full frontal nudity, nasty violence and drug use. Thus the film is torn between the two camps; the writing is too simple for adults but the adult material will stop kids seeing it.

    Essentially the story is that these toffs at a private boarding school in England would rather spend three days in an old underground World War Two bunker (the titular ‘Hole') than go to Wales on a school trip. Everything is engineered so that the school assumes that they have gone home for the duration whilst their parents think that they have actually gone to Wales. In other words, nobody knows where they are there. Ultimately the events unfold and they end up stuck in the Hole and proceed to go stir crazy.

    My biggest hang up is the presence of Thora Birch. Firstly her twee English accent is all over the place. They should have just let her speak with her natural accent, as it would have been less of a distraction. Maybe as an Englishman this is a stick that I can unfairly beat her with and perhaps overseas no one will notice, but for me it was an unwelcome distraction (especially when there are many young British actresses who would've done a better job).

    Secondly she brings NOTHING to the movie. The other members of the young cast are relative unknowns and act her off the screen. They all give believable reputations of stuck up self-centred kids and the effects of human physical and mental degradation. I assume that Ms. Birch was brought in to add ‘international appeal' but she stifles and flounders around with her leading role, unable to rise to the challenge of her co-stars.

    Before you all assume that I'm bashing her because she's American think again because young American actor Desmond Harrington who plays Mike Steel, is the best thing about this movie.
  • I've been anticipating this film for a while since it is Thora Birch's first role since American Beauty. So, The Hole. The Hole has been hyped up as a horror/psychological film in which 4 students are locked down an old wartime bunker (-the- Hole) to avoid a boring Geography field trip. How does it fare?

    The casting is probably the jewel of this film. It's superb. The absolutely stunning Keira Knightley (Sabé from Star Wars Episode I) appears as Liz's (Birch) friend, Frankie. All the rest of the characters are complete unknowns, except the psychologist played by Embeth Davidtz (Matilda, Bridget Jones, Schindler's List), but they all act their parts excellently.

    This film really has the British 'feel' mastered. The sets are excellent, the locations are splendid, and the whole 'feel' of the movie is very realistic. The school really does feel like a British public school (A British 'public school' is like a 'private school' in the US.. one where you need rich parents to flash $$$ to get you in). The unnamed pupils seem extremely realistic.

    There are only three small flaws with this film. The first is that it doesn't exactly live up to the hype in the British press. I did not find this scary at all, but it was an extremely well done mystery/whodunnit. Horror? Nah, not unless you classify psychological thrillers as 'horror'.

    The second flaw is that the transitions between different parts of the film can be rather confusing. Often, the film bounds around past and present shots and be extremely disorienting in places. Unlike Memento, this disorientation is not an advantage. However, at the end of the film, you'll be able to tie all of the parts together and leave feeling quite satisfied with the story (a bit like the film 'Wild Things').

    Another minor let down is the music. Totally forgettable, has no place in the film, and it often appears at the most inappropriate times.

    I really do hope this is released in the USA soon, as Thora Birch is definitely not to be missed here.. and I think the stunning Keira Knightley is going to be getting some bigger roles from now on, she's definitely earned her stripes here. So, my big question, why has this not been scheduled for US release!?

    This is certainly not a Blair Witch Project clone, although this impression has been given by the press. Instead, this is a cleverly constructed and extremely well casted psychological thriller/mystery.
  • The Hole is a film that takes me back to many years ago when i was a child sitting up late at night and watching the Hammer house Of Horror movies which used to scare the hell out of me but as an adult found rather tame. this really does have the Hammer feel about it , the acting is good as is the atmosphere created by the director but the story is sadly lacking. Dont get me wrong, the story is not bad be i was crying out for a twist something that what make it stand out as being different. I'm sorry to say it didnt happen. The Idea was superb, 4 kids stuck in hole in the ground unable to get out because they had been locked in by either a friend or by one of the four themselves. So much potential yet it failed to live up to it. 7 out of 10.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Do yourself a favour - just read the spoilers and don't waste your time on this film...

    I've always searched for a reason as to why I'm afflicted by male pattern baldness. At first I thought it was having to work with the public for years, and then I put it down to the polluted air in Glasgow or maybe the far fetched idea that it was hereditary. Now I think I've found the answer: I'm going bald due to having to sit through crap like this for years on end in pursuit of a decent horror picture.

    First off, we have a setting that most of us can relate to: an upper class private school in England. As everyone knows most of the population of Britain attends these types of school, although the one I went to must have been needing a bit of an overhaul as there was a fight every five minutes, all the girls were pregnant, and when we finished school the teachers took us outside, beat the crap out of us and told us never to come back.

    Moron McScream (Custardpants McGhee) turns up traumatised after some ordeal and phones 911 (in Britain!) and screams down the phone. Turns out she's been trapped in a disused bunker with three of her mates and SOMETHING HAS HAPPENED. It's up to a psychologist to find out what's happened while the police do crosswords. So it's a kind of backstory type film we're dealing with here.

    Y'see Moron has a crush on Chugnut(played by James Dogsdober), an American Tom Cruise lookalike who we immediately hate. However, Chugnut isn't interested in her, and would prefer to hang around with his best mate Tamponboy(Dangleberry Skidmark, who looks exactly like the kind of person who would attend this kind of school - he's posh, skinny, blonde, goofy, and looks like a relation to the Philips family). Somehow Keira Skinnyposh is involved in this somehow somehow somehow too, but I need not go into details or anything.

    It's up to DJ Jazzmag to sort out a little party in a bunker somewhere near the school that he's inexplicably found. Once inside, he locks them in and they panic and then after three days he let's them out again - or does he? Because there's three bodies down there, and even though Moron has just told the psychologist that they were let out, she's lying. However, the psychologist doesn't say anything because that would affect the plot. In the meantime DJ Jazzmag is arrested and does his best to ensure that the audience will destroy their televisions rather than sit through anymore of this contrived rubbish.

    In between screaming in a really annoying voice he says that Moron and Skinnyposh were pure slags man and that they all went down there to get stoned and fornicate and pick their noses and no one believes him. Thankfully I think I blacked out at some point because DJ Jazzmag turns up at Moron's house and all of a sudden the psychologist and Moron are back in the bunker and Moron is confessing everything FOR NO REASON AT ALL.

    She wanted to get into Chugnut's pants when they were all wasted but Tamponboy and Chugnut both went for Skinnyposh so naturally Moron goes radge and locks everyone in until she and Chugnut are in love. By this time Skinnyposh has died of Bolemia or something and Chugnut has killed Tamponboy for hiding coca-cola. When Chugnut finds out that Moron has had a key all along he goes and gets himself killed accidentally but Moron thinks that's okay because now he can't do the dirty on her.

    Naturally Moron changes her tune when the cops turn up and says that the psychologist was going to hurt her. Why confess anyway...then? Why do anything? Why do the cops believe everything she says? Why was there only two killings? Where's the slaughter promised in the trailer? Who is this film aiming for anyway? Absolute rubbish. Utter crap. Mince. Puke. Garbage. No gore, no suspense, a twist people can see a mile off. Even what I suppose would be the target audience (teenagers with no social life) would be put off by this.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Here goes,

    The whole movie is about one girls obsession with another boy, and the lengths she goes to make him notice her. I know you have 'cliché' ringing about your ears already but this movie has managed to twist and contort itself to such extremes that it took me a while even to break it down that far.

    First of all I saw the trailer, very deceiving, portraying the movie as some kind of teen slasher, with the deep voiced narrator telling of how they wanted to be in this 'hole' so much, yet after not long are desperate to get out. There was even the ubiquitous shot of a girl (liz) screaming as if some masked killer were about to chalk her onto the list of not so memorable movie deaths. But instead I can only think this trailer was done to try and draw the student and teen population into the cinema's to watch a much darker and more frightening movie.

    Forget about the hole, the hole is unimportant. The movie could have easily been called 'the big wardrobe' or something foolish. It's not about the fact that these people are stuck in a hole, it only represents an unbreakable boundary holding them in, albeit a slightly spooky one. The real boundary is Liz's encapsulating herself in her own hole by being so fazed with this boy (mike) even to the extent that when her best friend is vomiting in the only disgusting toilet in the hole, right next to her, she doesn't notice and tries to strike up a conversation about how Mike is starting to notice her more.

    Another thing I liked was the lack of twist in the movie. Wes Craven seems to write this book of movie rules after every one of good movies, and all his pioneering new idea's are fast turned into known and hated cliché's. That's what I think of all these slasher flicks thinking they have to have a 'twist'. There wasn't a clear twist in this movie, there was a gradual change of emphasis, guises of the same theme, but no 'oh it was only a dream'... or 'I'm your father Jessie' kind of twists.

    About 8 people walked out near the end of this movie when I was watching it at the cinema. I can only guess it was because they expected to come and see a movie where pretty girls got stabbed and then died quickly and never seen again. Instead they had some truly gruesome deaths followed by sickening decay and rotting, and the decay of the living due to lack of water. And the most frightening thing about the movie was the fact that for one girl, it was all self imposed.

    So if you want to see a pretty girl get stabbed go to watch another 'I know what you did last summer' sequel, but if you want a slightly disturbing psychological thriller then give this one a shot.

    Xand
  • Four students from an exclusive private school decide to sneak off and spend a few days in a deserted underground bomb shelter rather than go on a trip to Wales with their classmates. However, when they become mysteriously locked in their remote hideaway, and days turn into weeks, it looks as though the shelter might become their tomb.

    Told in flashbacks, by the only survivor, the Hole is an interesting but unexceptional psychological drama blessed with a particularly strong cast. Even though, at times, the plot gets a little dull, the talented leads (Thora Birch, Keira Knightly, Desmond Harrington and Laurence Fox) lift it above the hum-drum with their terrific performances. Birch is particularly good as Liz Dunn, the girl who has a secret crush on Harrington's fanny-magnet son-of-a-rock-star. Knightly is also pretty good as popular good time girl Frankie, and fans of hers will be delighted to know that she gets 'em out for the lads in this one (I couldn't care less—they're not that impressive!).

    As the story unfolds, we gradually learn the terrible truth behind the foursome's predicament, and are treated to some quite nasty scenes as food begins to run out, people get ill and tempers start to flare.

    Not a classic by any stretch of the imagination, The Hole is nevertheless a solidly entertaining film that passes the time quite nicely. 6.5 out of 10, rounded up to 7 for IMDb.
  • "The Hole" is a very good twisted little Thriller set in England & about four friends at a posh private public school that hide out in a WW2 bunker in the nearby woods so they can have a weekend of partying rather than go on a boring school trip but it turns deadly when they can't get out.

    Thora Birch (Hocus Pocus) gives an excellent performance as Liz, a girl with a big crush on American student Mike, played by the excellent Desmond Harrington, this guy is a genre favourite from the early 2000's from starring in Awesome flicks such as Ghost Ship & Wrong Turn & here he gives the best acting performance I've seen him do.

    There's also Keira Knightley (Pirates of the Caribbean) as the popular girl Frankie & Lawrence Fox (DeathWatch) as Geoff, both solid actors.

    All acting is spot-on from the four main friends as panic & terror sets in once they realise they're trapped & are low on food & water & no one knows where they are!!!

    I really enjoyed this survival Thriller from way back in 2001 on video & i hadn't seen it in years but totally enjoyed it again.

    The setting is very claustrophobic & things get very nasty & disturbing amongst the friends as things get desperate but there's more to the story that unravels as the movie goes on & someone is behind these horrific events so there's a Mystery that gradually comes to a twisted ending.

    As far as these set-in-one-place survival films go, i think The Hole is one of the best & is a gripping little story & being set in England makes it stand out from all the American ones.

    A good Psychological survival Thriller with a top cast.
  • vip-danii4 October 2016
    Not perfect, but could've been much worse. I like Thora Birch and how she's always cast to play odd, eccentric (and, in this case, dark, twisted and sinister) characters. It suits her and she does it well. However, in this movie, her performance was weaker compared to other movies I've seen her in.

    A half-decent psychological thriller despite the fact that not a lot of people will probably be able to relate to any of the characters, which somewhat lowers the entertainment value. Plus the relatively implausible plot. These are probably the 2 main weaknesses of this movie.

    Nevertheless, I thought it wasn't a bad film, though they could've done a better job on building the suspense...
  • If you have seen the trailers (or read some of the reviews), you would be forgiven of thinking of this film as a dark and disturbing thriller, unfortunately, this is not the case.

    The acting is first rate from the leading five, though Embeth Davidtz, an experienced actress, is confined to a character with little scope for the talents she has displayed in previous films, and I find it disappointing that her acting skills were curtailed by such a restrictive screenplay.

    And herein lies the main problem for this film. The characterisations are excellent, but the limited experience of the writers shines through. This film has none of the twists and turns you would expect from a thriller, an ending that is at once unconvincing, predictable, and weak, and plot holes you could drive a bus through.

    Director, Nick Hamm, shows great promise as this film is very well put together, and he certainly gets the best from the main four actors. However he seems to have neglected the talents of everyone else in the film (bar Daniel Brocklebank as Martin).

    In my opinion, this film was well acted and directed, if only the plot could have been better, we might have seen another classic British film. However I fear that this film will sink into obscurity. It seems a shame that such talent was not used on a film with better writers.

    I await with anticipation Nick Hamm's next offering, and hope that he finds a screenplay to stretch both himself and the whole cast.
  • Truly, fresh and new ideas, rarely make it to film. The Hole, based on the novel (after the Hole) by Guy Burt is a good exception to this. It is seldom that we see a top quality thriller, but this movie is well cast, well directed, and works wonderfully. The story is quite simple really, it relies on strong characterisation and good dialogue. All the cast give good performances and Thora Birch is outstanding. This thriller really does keep you on the edge of your seat throughout; it is very dark, very creepy and has a terrifying atmosphere. I would recommend this film to anyone who likes a good thriller. It isn't in the same league as Se7en and Silence of the Lambs, but it is better than most thrillers that are released.

    8/10 A great film.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This is by no means a straight forward 'yes I liked it' nor a 'that was pure crap'. The problem with The Hole is a problem which a lot of movies seem to have these days, but the opposite. The trailers for movies give away so much of the movie that generally it would be a lot easier to fill in the gaps that we see in the trailers rather than venture to the cinema on a saturday night. You see, the trailer for this movie seemed to go on for a long time and basically I thought I knew the premise of the movie and it seemed like it would be a very chilling, bad guy with a mask who no-one sees kills beautiful young people. This could not be much further from the truth.

    It is, instead, a psychological nightmare vision of how far people can push things in the name of love. There is no demon down the hole instead there is a young girl who allows herself to be mentally distorted by a physical longing for a guy.

    The writing is quite clearly lending a nod towards similarly structured movies as Rashomon whereupon there is an effort made to give the same story many different view points. A very brave effort which doesnt quite manage to work. This is in part due to the fact that a very promising opening set-up is cut very short, which is a great shame as it was looking to be a really good exploration of what people do in times of crisis. That appraoch is thrown away when the real truth of events comes to life. This gives a very shallow emotional depth to the film and when charcters begin to die there is no attachment, one and possibly even two of the depths are even very risible and the scope for really shocking psychology is over before you are even aware of it.

    In attempt to make the audiences head spin as to what went wrong and who did what we are instead left there saying to ourselves, 'yep, i saw that coming'. It does all becoming very predictable and by the end you are applauding yourself and thinking you could have wrote this yourself. That isn't to say that the director doesn't give us our fair share of clench the seat moments. On top of that there is a really good performance from the ever improving Birch who displays a near perfect Toff's accent.

    All this is undermined by the dramatic shaping and atmospheric qualities of the movie which in one last bid for cult status throws in an ending in the hope of people terming it this years sixth sense, and shocking the audience with its ingenuity, it doesn't work and makes you wonder whether or not the film has even ended when it has.
  • math_grenades27 November 2006
    Warning: Spoilers
    "The Hole" is one of the most predictable thrillers to come around in awhile.

    The plot - 4 teens get trapped in a bunker for weeks on end. Who locked them in? Take a guess. The chief suspect is SO obvious that you'll think to yourself "No way, it can't be her. Must be one of the supporting characters!" No, you were right the first time. SPOILER ALERT: Thora Birch is adequate, but she simply cannot convey crazy effectively.

    The film suffers the most from its horrid directing. The most intense scenes are badly shot, edited, and paced. The feeling of claustrophobia that a talented director would need to convey to truly make this film work is woefully absent. The Hole is simply TOO BIG.

    Knightley fills out her rather superficial role well enough. Laurence Fox and Desmond Harrington are the two real stars of the film, delivering fine performances. But it all fails in the end.

    The soundtrack is reminiscent of a Movie of the Week, the cinematography is base and uninspired, and the dialog is dull. If you want a good "young girl hatches a plot" film, watch "Wild Things." This isn't it.
  • This is no teen horror movie. Instead its a really good exploration into consequences of obsession. The direction was very good. I found it entertaining, frightening and most of all, thought provoking. Special mention to Thora Birch who adeptly highlights the subtle transformation of her character throughout the story.
  • Four teens have been missing from their expensive private school for 18 days. Then one of them Liz Dunn (Thora Birch) comes stumbling back to school. She tells police psychologist Dr. Horwood (Embeth Davidtz) a story of desperation. The four teens (Desmond Harrington, Keira Knightley, Laurence Fox) had wanted a private party away from their families and ditch their school trip. They employed the help of Martyn (Daniel Brocklebank) who faked their school records and locked them in an underground bunker. The plan was for him to return after the weekend to unlock the door and let them out. However he never returned.

    This movie has aspirations of something better. It wants to be a Hitchcock noir. For the first half, it achieves something close to it. However, the movie starts showing the real story, and any mystery disappears.

    There is a better way this could have gone. Director Nick Hamm probably should have stayed with Embeth Davidtz as she tries to unravel the mystery. If that's the case, he can't really have Thora Birch blab out the story so early on.

    Then there is the ending. It makes very little sense that anybody could believe Thora Birch's story. The basic premise that these kids would be willing to let themselves be locked up is too hard to believe. The first time they shut the door, they would want to try to test it. The whole thing seems convoluted.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Apt title for a plot containing many of them. At the beginning of this film, I began to get excited as it held my interest with gorgeous framing, crisp images and great soundtrack. However, (as usual) the plot began to leave our universe of believability with dumb and insulting developments. Even a High School student could tell you the police don't work that way. Oh well, if your brain's asleep, this could be great entertainment. For me, it evoked the, "Awww, c'mon!" reflex more than once.

    **A slight hint of a spoiler**

    Having stated that, there are a few cool foreshadowing scenes that show the director's potential: one of which is the throwing up portions. Watch how they connect.
An error has occured. Please try again.