Add a Review

  • Warning: Spoilers
    I watched this because I knew it was based on a novel I liked, "Just Like a Woman" by British actress Jill Gascoine (wife of Alfred Molina, who's better known to Americans than Jill is). Let me tell you, it is *loosely* based on the book and I cannot stress enough the word loosely.

    The book takes place in the '70s in Idaho. The movie is set somewhere near the ocean, although I'm not clear where, in the present. The characters' names have all been changed. The main character, played by Duke, is American instead of British. They have completely removed a pivotal mother-in-law character. The couple has 3 adult children in the book, in this movie there is only 1 son, plus a young grandson not in the book. She gives birth to a baby girl at the very end of the book, but in the movie the baby (also a girl) arrives less than halfway through.

    In the book, the woman winds up leaving her husband,who never really loved her, to be with her sensitive son-in-law. In the movie --->here comes a big spoiler<--- she gets back together with her husband after a brief separation because they love each other so much. The fact that that Duke's character Sunny's, husband's best friend has been in love with her for years is alluded to when he makes an overture toward her while she and husband Mick are separated. It comes out of nowhere and is dropped as soon as she rebuffs him.

    Duke is doing the best she can here, but this story is too full of holes. We are supposed to understand that Mick is mad at Sunny because she's always given in and done things his way (also a theme in Gascoine's novel) and now she is insisting on having the baby against his wishes. However, there is no way you would pick up on this important aspect of the story if they weren't telling you straight out. You do, at least, get the sense that Sunny, in addition to running her own business, has been pulling more than her share of the weight in the marriage.

    They discuss having undergone fertility treatments for 10 years, wanting another child. But, when Sunny gets pregnant accidentally at 50, she sees it as a blessing. Mick sees it as a burden. Eventually, he goes along with it, but rather halfheartedly. He goes with her when she has an ultrasound and tells her he'd forgotten how beautiful she was when she was pregnant. In the meantime, he's clearly less than enthusiastic and expresses his uncertainty about the situation. He's in the OR when she has a c-section, but doesn't come back to the hospital to visit until late the next day. Once they bring the baby home, Mick does everything to avoid being at home and refuses to keep her on his own when Sunny has to work. None of this is done very convincingly, due to the poor writing.

    Supposedly they are so wonderfully happy that they are looking forward to retiring and buying a boat to sail around the world (definitely NOT in the book). But, there is really no chemistry between the two and you find yourself surprised that she could bear the idea of being alone on a boat with him for months on end. They seem like they would rather spend less time together instead of more.

    The subplot with Sunny's business partner's marital problems is unnecessary. The time spent on that should have been used to explore Sunny and Mick's marriage a little more. The other subplot of Mick wanting to sell his business and their son wanting to buy it, in spite of years of tension between father and son, is pretty well done.

    The baby (or babies) is beautiful and lights up any scene she's in. Donna Hanover is a nice addition as a new "older mom" friend Sunny meets in the park. If you like Patty Duke, watch it. She gives as good a performance as you could expect. Otherwise, don't waste your time. If you've read the book, don't expect this film to resemble it at all.
  • Adaptation for TV of Jill Gascoine's book "Just Like a Woman" concerns 50-year-old businesswoman, on the verge of retiring with her husband on his boat, who learns she's pregnant, which puts the couple's plans on hold and causes the husband in particular to reexamine his life. Patty Duke (looking and acting a lot older than 50) has some choice moments in her portrayal of Sunny, a feisty middle-ager determined to have a final fling at motherhood, yet we don't get any sense of her priorities other than having this baby (she's either pinched or drawn in anger--or, worse, a shoulder for everyone else to cry on). Husband Ronny Cox has the more complex character, but his doubts and insecurities--very relatable human qualities--are treated almost villainously. The narrative jumps around, opening up new wounds and bringing in new characters, but skimps on emotion. ** from ****
  • It should be no surprise that The Divine Miss D had yet another winner last Wednesday night, even beating the Divine Miss M in the ratings. Love Lessons is a story that would probably scare the hell out of any middle aged couple....Duke and Ronny Cox find out she's having a baby at 50! What Duke's decision is will come at no surprise to viewers, but how they get there and paying the price for that decision are uttlerly fascinating due largely to the two performances. We can see both of their sides, so that is part of why you want to keep on watching, to see if you will finally agree with one or the other...Duke wants the baby, Cox does not. The film's only problem was with some rather mindless subplots including the affair that Duke's best friend's husband is having (On Duke's and Cox's boat!) and an old friend of the family who has had his eye on Duke for years. Other than that you have top-rate acting, directing (from fellow actor Doug Barr, who played Jean Smart's hubby on Designing Women) and script. Donna Hanover, NY Mayor Guliani's estranged wife also appears as Duke's best friend and is also fine in her role. If only CBS had more faith and aired it on a Sunday night instead of a Wednesday, but at least they aired it during a sweeps period (like most of Duke's movies). This is her best since 1997's A Christmas Memory. She's been around for close to 50 years now on screen...let's pray for fifty more!
  • BrockLong18 November 2007
    The plot for this movie is standard Lifetime Television for Women fare: a 50 year old woman finds herself pregnant and decides to keep the child in spite of her husband's objections. There is nothing remarkable about the story and is of the same quality of the thousands of similar female-related films.

    The only real comment I have about this movie is the casting. Patty Duke and Ronny Cox are cast as the 50-ish married couple when both of them look well over 65 in the movie. I couldn't get beyond Duke's aged appearance in watching this thing. Did any viewer truly believe that this woman was still able to have children? I kept waiting for a reporter from the National Enquirer to appear to write an article about the geriatric woman having a child! Duke may have been the appropriate age (roughly 54) to play the main character but the problem is that she looks far older than her years. Whoever cast this movie should be looking for a new job!
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I read the other reviews and I agreed with one review and I did not agree with the others.I think that this story was lovely to watch and it made me feel good.So many of the movies nowadays whether they are made for television movies or they are theatrical releases are downright depressing and you feel lousy after you watch them."Love Lessons" was the exception to the rule.First off Ronny Cox and Patty Duke were wonderful to watch as the married couple who find out that they are going to have a baby later in life.The story dealt with the problem in an intelligent and loving manner.I was pleased that she decided to have the baby instead of having an abortion which is American womens' answer to everything these days.Imagine that, the older woman decides to give the growing baby a chance to live,not die.I recommend this movie for lovers of life and for pro life people and for young people who can discover that there are answers other than abortion and divorce.