I really enjoy this..so fun and awesome.this is a good idea to watch news
Add a Review
-
damithsumanasinghe20 November 2019
-
ne1butme28 November 2000Only in the 21st century can nude Internet news broadcasts be taken seriously. From National and International news, all the way though weather, sports and ending with business, Naked News creates an environment much more pleasing to the eye than the standard national news programs. After all, Guys, whom would you prefer, A wonderful looking woman, or Peter Jennings. It's your decision.
-
terrigirl19758 April 2002Great TV show! (I have a satellite dish, so I don't have to pay. Shhh!!) The neat thing is that it's news but it's funny. The writing and acting are clever and nicely understated. I like that there are the ladies from the internet program (who are refreshingly real), but there are other really hilarous regulars too, like Raoul (rowrrr!) and the cute redhead who plays 'Jonny'. Lots of fun and it doesn't take itself too seriously. Totally worth checking out. Even better when it's free!
-
JoeJoe_Productions21 June 2006This has to be the Best News Program I have ever Seen! You might think I'm shallow, but, well, who gives a rats ass? This show is up to date with the latest news... plus it has lots of Naked Women.
I think its a great idea for a show. It gets more Viewers watching the News and remembering stuff. For example, have you ever watched a porno loads of times and then you hear the same background music somewhere else and you automatically remember the porno? Thats what the Naked News does, so say you're at a bar and someone is talking about the war on Iraq, then your Knowledge for the War floods back into you brain just from watching the Naked Ladies, I mean, News.
So, Watch the Naked News. It Makes you Intelligent! -
paoguy11824 June 2003When this was new, it was really worth watching. Now, if you're not a subscriber, it's hardly worth the effort. Even if I was a subscriber, I'm not sure it would be worth the time. The writing has become stale, and the girls are getting tiresome.
Plus, great-looking past hosts like have gone. I really miss gals like Brooke, Gretchen and Carmen while they retain annoying chicks like Lilly and Sandrine.
Oh well, thanks for the memories, girls. -
This show is incredibly lame. I feel sorry for all the girls in it. I don't know if they think they are going to use this to launch into a "real career" in acting or dare I say even in the legitimate news world but they are definitely dreaming unless their dream is to be full scale porn stars in which case I'm sure someone would gladly use them for that. They simply aren't very good at reading the news, it's a talent that you don't even realize exists among the real news anchors until you see someone trying to do it who really can't, like these girls. Very awkward reading. And they are for the most part good looking but not hot enough to get back as successful actresses based on looks alone. Hopefully they are well paid and having a lot of fun but I really don't think so, I'm sure whoever runs this show is exploiting them to the max. The worst part about the show is the writing. Even if they could read the news in an interesting, professional way, it is just terrible. Not newsworthy for the most part and definitely not funny at all. They cram jokes into every story and every single joke is just pathetic. It's obvious they think "hey we got naked girls reading this it doesn't matter what they read". Well that novelty wears off after a few minutes and it's just okay looking girls taking off their clothes and reading awkwardly. Yawn. And if you're yawning at naked girls you know there's a serious problem. One more thing. I know a lot of lonely basement dwelling 30-something virgins are probably giving this show ratings of 10 but this show getting a 9 out of 10 average with 1000 votes? There is definitely some vote tampering going on here.
-
justin-mulvey30 June 2018Let's face it, the news can be pretty boring, and sometimes you need a distraction. These women have come up with something that works.
The last review I read talked about their bodies. Yeah, they're not all modelesque. Some have less than perfect boob jobs. One I saw was downright fat. But who cares? It's a fun concept. It makes me laugh. If you're looking for porn, go watch porn.
I also liked all the natural breasts, unabashedly displayed. I think the many teens who will find ways to watch this show could benefit from seeing women as they really are - sag and all. -
dlhunt14 April 2002Naked News is nothing more than a gimmick laden, shallowly conceived program.
What is this show trying to be? Is it a news show to attract people to watch naked men and women? Is it a show with naked men and women to attract people to watch more news?
The news items they present merely skim the surface and the newscasts are padded with lifestyle and dog hero fluff.
The only thing that gives it redemption, if any, is that it includes Canadian news items.
Quite frankly, this should not have gone beyond comedy sketch status on Air Farce, 22 Minutes or Saturday Night Live. -
altaf0072 July 2001I think this is one of the best news program I have seen. I have watched it a couple of times, but I am already addicted. I wish they had this kind of program on TV. No matter what people say, but I still pay attention to the news.
-
hugemoron1 April 2002I've seen this on the web long, long ago. I decided to pay the 5 bucks for the TV version and OH MY GOD WHAT A JOKE!!!!
Great looking reporters? All but one. I won't name names. Pretty cool that they get naked while reporting the news? Yes most certainly. Is the news.. .NEWS WORTHY? Not on the TV version it wasn't. Good lord out dated news stories and silly sketches with some HORRIFIC ACTING!! At least porn stars put in a little more effort in there bad acting.
Back when I first saw this on the web the main reporter whose name I think was victoria had the best presentation and appearence doesn't seem to be on the show any more. Too bad because from what I saw all of them were pretty bad. Maybe it was just the content.
The episode I saw kept referring to Burlesque and man was it ever bad. WHO WROTE THIS CRAP? Give these poor girls something to read and report on! Or at least pay for them to take some local community college courses in journalism and have them do there own stories. -
BlackJack_B29 July 2015From some dank basement in downtown Toronto, The Naked News has been delivering pop-culture cheddar to the Internet since 1999. For a monthly or yearly subscription fee, people can see lipstick feminists shaking their moneymakers all in the name of Girl Power.
Imagine Entertainment Tonight or some lurid sex show with nude women...that's The Naked News. 20-25 minutes, 6 times a week of "sexy" women reading off of a telestrator. You should see these women as a lot of them have massive egos and think they are worthy of having shrines built to them. The good and beautiful anchors are the ones who realize the whole racket is just to be tongue-and-cheek and not to be taken seriously (Eila Adams, Madison Banes, Angie Heyward, Carli Bei, Isabella Rossini) but the women who shove their agendas down people's throats are unbearable.
First, we have Katherine Curtis. Ms. Curtis is a self-proclaimed nerd and humorless ultra-leftist bitch who acts like she is above everyone. The entire time she shows up on camera she flaunts her massive ego and spews her ridiculous ultra leftist beliefs to everybody while thinking she still has a killer body. Back in 2007 she was hot stuff, now, not so much with the flabby backside. She is also a co-writer and co-producer (as is Eila) but you can tell what segments she wrote.
Next is Peyton Priestly, Ms. "I only eat organic food and support animal rights". Certainly a great all-natural body but a nasally and annoying voice and sporting a massive ego to boot.
Then we have her identical twin sister Whitney St. John, who is only there when school is out. She has fake bosoms, wears nerd glasses to show how "smart" she is and thinks she's a big deal. She talks like a school professor.
Finally we have Natasha Olenski and Andrea Sully, two women from the Eastern Bloc. Olenski is not beautiful at all unless you like bad breast augmentation and while Sully's work is better, her behind is as flat as a board and both have voices that grate on my ears.
Despite the motto "The Program With Nothing To Hide" the location of their studio is a guarded secret. Of course, they do come out and do topless interviews made possible by my province's Topfree laws. They do lame man-on-the-street interviews about trivial stuff to bemused people embarrassed to be on camera.
The real kicker is the forced repartee between the ladies. It's painful to watch. It sounds like a conversation between women who deep down hate each other's guts but must pretend to be buddies. When you watch the local news, you can tell there's camaraderie between the anchors. Not here. Then again, I wouldn't want to be near Ms. Curtis, Ms. Priestly or Ms. St. John, either. Nothing like being told what to do with you life, eh?
If you want to pay for an overpriced subscription to be bored to death half the time by women spewing leftist policies on their audiences just to see those anchors that don't take themselves seriously then go on ahead. -
mngvinc21 December 2021Better viewing than 99-percent of the obnoxious leftist drivel that is out there. Guaranteed to put a smile on your face and brighten up your day in these miserable, difficult times.
-
reachkiramurphy29 September 2018This show is something to check out once for ten seconds or so just to see what the gag is and verify there is nothing more to it than that. At that is all this is, poorly written news pieces read poorly by kind of OK looking women while they take off all their clothes. None of them is very good as a host or interviews with people and the reading is wooden and boring. Worst of all it fails as any type of news source but also as a source of humor because none of the jokes are funny or delivered well either and usually there is no joke at all, just news pieces taken from other news sources that they read while stripping with zero excitement or sexiness at all. Also the news is very old that they read because they clearly just grab it from other online sources and it's not like they do big live news breaks or anything so it's all very old.
So not at all good for news, not at all good for comedy, not at all good for sexiness. This show has no point at all. Who actually watches this for more than a few seconds when the novelty wears off that quickly? Sad guys who like these attainable "regular girl" looking ladies who they think would go out with them? Like the sad dudes at the strip bars they probably find these girls in? I just don't get it. -
wylfyr10 January 2003Ok, well anyone who says news is boring should check it out. I always thought news was news...WRONG...I checked out Naked News and loved it. My favorite Anchorwoman has to be Lily Kwan, I just love the way she does the business reports ;). Sadly though, my subscription ran out a few months ago.