User Reviews (20)

Add a Review

  • Some time after their botched operation to capture a known Palestinian terrorist named Amar Kamil (Vincent Regan) , a secret team suffers events go awry . After getting away an assassination's attempt in Luxembourg , a bunch of Israeli agents starts to get killed off one by one . Their leader (Christopher Lambert) must get to the bottom of things before the murderous plan to be completed as he takes one to kill one .

    European co-production by UK|France|Luxembourg that contains action , intrigue , thrills , suspense ; however resulting to be some tiring and dull . It's a direct to video film made in low budget and failed at box-office . Based on the novel titled "The Heat of Ramadan" by Steven Hartov and screenplay by Ripley Highsmith , the film develops an intrigue about secret agents from Mossad and OLP . Regular performances from two main protagonists Christopher Lambert and his nemesis Vincent Regan . The best acting turns out Kerry Fox , a notorious British actress who has not achieved a great success. There appears in a pretty secondary role Maryam d'Abo who formerly was Bond-girl for John Glen in 'The Living daylights' . Functional cinematography by Alec Mills shot in Luxembourg , Israel and beach scenes in Nice, Alpes-Maritimes, France . Atmospheric musical score by Waltzing , including Arab and Israel sounds .

    The film was produced by the Jewish Avi Nesher , being professionally made by John Glenn . John keeps this moving, though with no much originality and with some flaws and gaps . He has directed the most number of James Bond movies , totaling five . Glenn filmed various 007 outings , previously directed 2nd unit and edition on some early Bond movies . He directed several entries such as ¨Licence to kill¨, ¨A view to kill¨ , ¨For your eyes only¨ and ¨Octopussy¨ that are incredibly fast pace . The film will appeal to Christopher Lambert enthusiasts , but good for fans only . Rating : Mediocre .
  • Hard to believe that the director of this film was once trusted with directing some of the films in the James Bond series. This is a worse than average action film, badly written, acted and directed. The subject is of an Israeli anti-terrorist squad mistakenly targeting the wrong man, and as a result its members becoming the target of a revenge series of murders. The way the Israeli ambiance and individuals are being described is completely wrong, and the complete idealization of the Israeli side does not help. The Middle East conflict is much more complex than a good vs. bad guys gun fight, but even for an action movie there are not too many new, unexpected or interesting things to be seen. A waste of time - 3 out of 10 on my personal scale.
  • jhoeboer-131 August 2006
    Warning: Spoilers
    After watching it yesterday I basically have a mixed feeling about this film. The piece has a strong start with a chase and some action which looks gritty and not all "over the top" like in most action films, so that's a good thing. There are moments when the action displayed in this film, like shootouts and car chases, looks surprisingly realistic.

    However the film is plagued by too many plot holes and moments where the viewer is treated like a brainless observer. Just some examples:

    *Possible spoilers*

    1. After the guy who went back to the USA to study gets shot in a store by the main baddie they bury him back in Israel. Directly after the funeral Christopher Lambert and the blonde woman talk in the car about how excited they are that she acquired a job at an embassy in Greece.

    Their best friend just died horribly, they buried him and seconds later it's all "lets be happy together again and oh did I already tell you I have a new job"? No normal person would respond in this manner.

    2. When the main bad guy goes to Israel to pick up the hardware, that he needs for the final hit, at an old man's workshop he gets attacked by some Palestine kids. Seconds after they start throwing stones 3 Israeli soldiers race around the corner, down the street and "liberate" him.

    3. The old military guy in charge of the whole operation is your stereotypical hard ass who doesn't use his common sense. "Oh sure we just lost 3 members of a top secret strike force in a row but he they are probably all accidents anyway so no reason to be alarmed".

    ------------------

    Basically the film has too many of such plot holes and moments where the viewer is asked to suspend disbelief. It's also heavily focused on the Israeli point of view, with little room for a more balanced point of view where both sides of the political spectrum are brought into view.
  • Me being a huge fan of Lamberts movies I decided to splash out and buy "The Point Men" for a mere £2.98.

    I wasn't expecting too much from this movie. I had a suspicion it would be just another dumb B-movie action movie...and I was correct.

    At times, I drifted off while watching "The Point Men". At times this movie seemed quite confusing. I also experienced deja-vu on numerous occasions during this movie, it had a "seen it all before" feel to it.

    But when I compare The Point Men to some of Lambert's earlier movies such as Gunmen, Road Flower, and even the dreadful Highlander II (the first Highlander is a classic)then The Point Men doesn't seem all that bad.

    Overall, there's nothing special about The Point Men, it's just another low budget action movie with little purpose but I have to say, it's certainly not the worst "terrorist" action movie I've seen.

    And whats with that ridiculous moustache Lambert wears towards the end?!?

    5/10
  • Warning: Spoilers
    If he is given a good part Christopher Lambert can certainly act but in a routine film like this he is going through the motions, creaking out the dialogue with his gravelly voice. The film is about his special ops colleagues being killed off by a vengeful terrorist.... and other things. It got confusing at times. You didn't really get to know the colleagues before they were bumped off in different parts of the world. The location cinematography was decent enough. The movie needed more excitement and suspense.

    It did have a good selection of false moustaches which was nice.
  • KiCk4z4 November 2001
    Yet another low budget b-movie starring the not so bad Lambert. I don't know what to call this movie. I think it's supposed to be a political thriller or something like that. But to me this movie has nothing. No story, no message, it's just a mess.

    The movie is about a antiterrorist team that screws things up a little and kills the wrong guy? this team is a bunch of amatuers if you ask me ;) and then the terrorist wants his revenge and starts to take them out one by one. Doesn't it sound exiting? I'm sorry but it really isn't!

    I think this john glen guy should consider a career change because if he can't do any better then this... well do i have to say more. If you must see this movie for some strange reason prepare to be bored and annyoed with bad acting and bad scripting.
  • This movie was so terrible, I only watched it to the end because I wanted to see them all DIE!

    Maybe because I am Israeli, and know my country, it's locations and people was this movie a 2.

    Many of the shots that were allegedly in Israel (see signs in Hebrew) were obviously shot in Europe.

    Some were truly a joke. Like a park with lush green lawns and low pines, something that does not exist in Israel.

    Noting about this movie made sense. The plot was more than absurd, that I found myself asking myself... did I just miss something?

    So many things left unexplained. Then there was the acting. Christopher Lambert was cute, like 30 or so years ago. Now he looks like he was rode hard and put away wet. And whenever him speak it's like his voice is dubbed.

    Bad bad bad....

    Don't waste your time.
  • (2001) The Point Men THRILLER

    Adapted from a novel "The Heat of Ramadan" by Steven Hartov which opens with a failed assassination attempt at a Palestinian terrorist led by anti- terrorist covert, Tony Eckhardt (Christopher Lambert). It turns out the intended target, Amar Kamil (Vincent Regan), and as a result of not knowing what he actually looks like, he is able to turn the tables and execute each member from Eckhardt's team.

    Some of those executions conducted by the terrorist outsmarting the anti-terrorist unit was 100% avoidable, any one of them can be used as bait to lure the terrorist to them. It was dumb from the beginning.
  • I have seen most of Christopher Lamberts movies. I have several favourites like "Highlander 1-3" (of course, Resurrection, Fortress and "The Hunted". I think that "Fortress 2" wasn´t that good, so I really was looking forward to this movie. Lambert plays the agent Tony from Israel(!), he is hunting a terrorist with his group. They kill a guy, who they think is the terrorist but Tony is sure that they have killed the wrong dude. One by one the terrorist (with his new plasticsurgery-face) kills Tonys groupmembers. It´s easy to understand what will happen next. The filming is like they have made the film with a handycam. It is very low-budget-style when they have their carchase in the beginning of the film. Lamberts performance is very solid and I really hope that he will find a better script, because the other film he has made this year also became a sad story for us Lambert-fans. We want you back in the parts that made you the one you are today. Like in "Knight moves", "The Hunted" or "resurrection". It doesnt have to be a fantastic story like in "Beowulf" or "Mortal Kombat" but something that you can understand and still is very exciting. I can not say other than that this movie was a cheap try to make a political thriller. 4 / 10
  • dima-1218 November 2001
    Rare are the authors that are able to create a vivid movie about the clashes of Israeli hitmen and Arab terrorists. 007 - veteran John Glen joined the legion of these greats with his latest feature THE POINT MEN. "Ripley Highsmith"`s script (based on Steve Hartov`s novel THE HEAT OF RAMADAN) served as an exceptional reason for the reunion of the reliable B - cast that doesn`t even warm the bench in the mainstream cinema these days. Action fans eventually got an opportunity to enjoy a pretty smart conception of heartwarming cliches from the , allegedly dead, MOSSAD - genre that was revived by an intelligent script, above average budget and Glen`s crafty direction of gunfights and car chases where bullets really hit the flesh and real cars get smashed up. No comment belongs out of this statement. There`s just home cinema for all those action buffs who craved for a good flip of an expensive Mercedes ever since McTiernan`s DIE HARD WITH A VENGEANCE.
  • The movie Point Men is essentially a start to finish action movie. Director John Glen gives a trademark stylish view of terrorism set in the middle east. The story is horrific, and even more so knowing it's actually based on a true story.

    Cinematographer Alec Mills makes the film look very real and gives it the air it needs in forming an atmosphere that's both nice to watch and somewhat difficult to look at as it depicts the tone of violence in an very effective way.

    Although the film has obvious lack of budget, John Glen somehow manages to make an effective action film that mainly look gloss and feature some breathtaking driving sequences.

    It has, in glimpses, a sort of Glen's Bond feel to it. The performance from C.Lambert is at his best. Although that doesn't say too much as I have a sneaking suspicion he just about always acts as himself.

    I'd give it a 7/10 for it's Glen/Mills/Lambert touch.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    ***SPOILERS***James Bond like action flick that takes place over some half dozen countries involving this crack Israeli Mossod assassination team headed by the though as nails Tony Eckhardt, Christopher Lambert. It's Tony's job to put an end to top Palestine hit-man Amar Kamil, Vincent Reagan, who's out to foil the Israeli Palestinian peace process before it gets off the ground.

    After escaping an assassin attempt in Luxembourg by Tony's hit-team Kamil had his face surgically altered to look like an AP photographer so he can get back at those who tried to do him in as well as wiped out his entire family of Palestinian guerrillas. Right from the start you see that Kamil means business by having the doctor and nurse, both very pro-Palestinian, who altered his looks murdered for no other reason then in trying to show the audience just what a ruthless and unfeeling psycho he is. With stopping the Israeli Palestinian peace process as the main goal, by those who are backing him, Kamil instead goes after Tony and his hit-team for strictly personal reasons. This gives Tony the drop on Kamil to not only what he's up to but what, with his faced surgically altered, he looks like!

    In Austria Germany Monaco as well as New York City Kamil whacks almost all of Tony's assassination team members until his not too on the ball, who must have gotten his job by knowing someone in high places, boss Israeli Gen. Ben-Zion, Martin Siegel, finally puts him and what's still left of his team back together. It's now Tony's, who up until then was made to shuffle paper and sharpen pencils, main job to hunt down and put Kamil's reign of terror, in destroying any hopes of peace between the Israelis and Palestinians, to an end. By then Kamil had already made his way back to his home town- Jerusalem-ready willing and able to knock off top Palestinian Representative President Jamil El-Aziz, Patrick Dean, at the peace signing ceremony slated to take place there between him and the Israeli Prime Minister.

    ***SPOILERS*** Despite the almost non-stop action interrupted by the scenic views of the many on location shots in the film the plot was anything but logical or cohesive. Kamil who was so successful in knocking off almost Tony's entire elite hit-team just couldn't get a good shot at Palestinian President Jamil El-Aziz, who we find out is Kamil's half-brother, even when he was less then 20 feet away from him with his gun-site trained on his head! Kamil's flawless escape plan fell apart by the simple reason that his decoy the AP photographer he was impersonating somehow escaped his, Kamil's men, captors! How this was done was never shown in the movie. In fact you get the impression that the flawless escape plan was dropped, for budget reasons, or totally forgotten about by the movie makers with the hope that those watching the film would forgot, in all the confusion, about it as well!
  • Usually I despise these direct to video action films, but something about The Point Men struck me, and I walked away with a smile on my face. This film is much better then some recent major studio movies that dealt with terrorism; I am of course talking about the disappointing Collateral Damage and the god-awful Bad Company. The film doesn't really go for too much style, instead the action scenes are raw and bloody. I've always enjoyed Christopher Lambert, he's not a great actor but he gives it his all; like he does here. Nothing to seek out, but if you are looking for a good way to kill an evening, Point Men is a lot better then most are giving it credit for.
  • Point men is a low budget Action Thriller with Christopher Lambert as the lead & it's good fun. I usually always like Lambert movies but like all Actors he has done some terrible films & i know he is usually found in low budget straight to video type movies but hey that doesn't mean they are all bad. Lambert is very cool here in Point men & lifts the film up to a better level of quality by him starring in it & that is because Lambert brings a serious & tense tone to his performance's!!!! This is an action Thriller with bursts of bloody violence about a known terrorist who is believed to be dead but is not who has come back for revenge by killing off Lamberts team called The Foreign Legion & it's up to Lambert to start hunting him down in a game of cat & mouse in true double crossing spy style!!! It's obviously low budget but made well enough & with some really brutal & bloody scenes & a tense atmosphere & a really good performance by Christopher Lambert so yes a worth it watching or buying Thriller. The best Lambert has ever been is in the cult classic prison sci-fi thriller FORTRESS (1992) i don't think he has ever beaten his intense performance in that excellent movie but he is usually good most films such as ADRENALINE: FEAR THE RUSH (1996) another dark sci-fi action Thriller i think lambert is best in dark sci-fi action Thrillers but he's still a very cool & intense actor & he's very good here in The Point Men.
  • THE POINT MEN, made in 2001, is an action vehicle centred around waning star Christopher Lambert, whose HIGHLANDER days were long behind him by this stage. The plot is very much run of the mill for genre, involving a shifty Middle Eastern villain who's got a vendetta against a team of crack operatives, and it's all very familiar. But there's one thing that makes this special: the presence of Bond director John Glen at the helm.

    Yes! Incredibly enough, Glen's star has also fallen far enough for him to be reduced to this kind of low-budget fare. That's great news for the film, which incorporates a series of stunning action sequences which are clearly handled by a master director; the opening chase is particularly vivid and exciting, good enough to rival Glen's work on the Bond films a couple of decades earlier.

    As the story progresses I found myself highly entertained, purely down to the direction. The bit with the truck is also excellent, and if it does tail off a bit towards the end then that's forgivable. Cast-wise, Lambert gives a typical turn, leaving me with the usual impression: that he's a nice guy, but that he doesn't have much presence. Kerry Fox is miscast, but GAME OF THRONES star Donald Sumpter lends some gravitas and Vincent Regan is ever decent, this time as the bad guy. Watch out for former Bond girl Maryam d'Abo in a minor role...
  • Just finished watching this movie yesterday afternoon and was impressed enough with it to look for reviews on Google. This action movie definitely did not treat one side as all good, the other as all bad. It did, however deal with good and bad people on both sides. I also enjoyed the love story in this movie, not hokey as in so many movies, and could have realistically taken place; not something just thrown in. I would say that this was more of a thinking person's action film! When a certain's assassin's motives were revealed, even he was more understandable. Also, two foes came to somewhat soften their hatred towards one another. Watched the Blade series this weekend and thought it was very good; much better than the Matrix movies. What's one man's junk, is another man's treasure!
  • dee.reid2 December 2001
    It stars Christopher Lambert as some sort of an assassin named Tony and his team of assassins who are after a dangerous terrorist. When a sting to bust the terrorist goes wrong and an agent is killed, Tony believes the wrong man was killed and all the blame is being directed towards Tony. Soon afterwards, members of Tony's team start getting killed off. Tony suspects it was the terrorist, but know one believes him, not even his team members. Then Tony goes to solve the mystery by himself.

    This is an all right thriller. Christopher Lambert is good as always. I don't know why he is so over-looked by mainstream directors. The straight to video movies he does are all right, but are inevitably soon to start getting stupid.

    Disclaimer: the video box for "The Point Men" contains a warning that says that because it deals with terrorism, it may turn away some viewers because of the events of September 11.

    7/10
  • Warning: Spoilers
    John Glen holds the distinction of helming more James Bond movies than any other director. He got his start on the Bonds as an editor and graduated with "For Your Eyes Only" as the director. Each of his 007 epics are classic, polished, and exciting. Glen displayed a knack for action filmmaking. Alas, when audiences turned away in droves for the second Timothy Dalton Bond adventure "License to Kill," the Bond producers cleaned house. Glen's career went into decline because nothing he made thereafter benefited from the force of a dynamic character like James Bond. The former Bond helmer hasn't lost his punch. Indeed, "The Point Men" has all the trappings of a Bond movie since it concerns one of the Mossad's ultra-hush, hush, assassination squads. Essentially, this briskly-paced 90-minute melodrama is a revenge thriller about a killer whittling down the squad one operative at a time. The PLO villain is as ruthless as he is methodical. At one point, he goes under a plastic surgeon's knife to disguise himself. After he has been given a new visage, the villain shoots not only the plastic surgeon but also his nurse. The action was lensed on actual locations in Luxembourg, France, Israel, and New York City, and this enhances the film's authenticity. Lenser Alec Mills' cinematography is solid stuff; he served as Glen's director of photography on "Christopher Columbus: The Discovery," "Iron Eagle: Aces: Iron Eagle 3, "The Living Daylights," and "License to Kill." Actress Maryam d'Abo has a small role as one of the squad. She played the romantic lead in Glen's "The Living Daylights."

    The opening scene bristles with action, explosions, and death. There is no shortage of melodrama in Ripley Highsmith's adaption of Steven Hartov's novel. Hartov wrote the two "Mercenary" straight-to-video movies. Mind you, Glen still knows how to orchestrate action scenes. "Highlander" star Christopher Lambert plays a sympathetic Mossad assassin who is convinced that his team iced the wrong terrorist. Miraculously, Tony Eckhardt (Lambert) survives an opening shoot-out in broad daylight but his partner (Hendrick Haese of "Contaminated Man") dies. No sooner has Rainer shot Amar Kamil than two unknown guys with small arms show up and blaze away at them. Maddy Hope (Kerry Fox of "Shallow Grave") pulls up in her car as the wounded Tony staggers away from the shooting. Maddy and he wind up participating in a careening car chase that ends disastrously with a fireball explosion wherein two men are barbecued. Tony winds up in Hadassah Hospital in Jerusalem. He asserts that the man they killed was not the notorious Palestinian terrorist.

    Naturally, nobody believes Tony. Eventually, our hero leaves the hospital with his left arm in a sling and an automatic pistol tucked behind his back. Tony explains that the man they shot had a look of surprise in his eyes. Consequently, Tony and his 'foreign legion' of comrades are disbanded and reassigned. Nevertheless, the Middle-East villains aren't content to let old ills lay quietly. Tony is forced to take a desk job while one of his buddies goes back to college in New York City. Harry Webber (William Armstrong of "The Dark Knight") is the first member of the team to bite the dust. The killer stages the killing as if it were collateral damage during a convenience store robbery. The next man in their team, Peter Hauser (Nicolas de Pruyssenaere of "Black Book") dies next, in an explosion after his automobile is smashed and pushed off a mountain. Tony accuses Israel Intelligence of killing their former comrades because they still don't believe. Unfortunately, our hero cannot convince his superiors and some of his friends until it is too late. Eventually, Tony learns that the villain is motivated because his hit squad killed his two brothers and his wife. The villain plans to kill a PLO leader seeking peace, even though he is his half-brother.

    Glen directs with a sure hand. "The Point Men" is better than average with a villain who struggled against the irony in his predicament. Not bad, but not great.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    SPOILERS. This is an action/spy drama that strictly middle of the road. The acting isn't too bad, nor is it too good. The direction is efficient, but no more than that. The script is imaginative but not too much so. You get the picture.

    Lambert is an intense actor, what with his crossed eyes and desperate features. It's difficult to believe him when he projects happiness with his family of Israeli operatives or, later, with his wife and child. The group seems finally to have dispatched their chief opposite number who will stop at nothing to demolish the Peace Process in the Middle East. He has, however, engineered a tricky escape and begins one by one to pick off the Israelis. Lambert is convinced that it is actually he, the chief baddy, but no one else wants to believe him and he operates on his own, Dirty Harry style. The baddy, by the way, is hard to miss, sort of beefy and evil looking until after his plastic surgery. (And he still looks suspicious to me!) The car of one of the Israelis is forced off the road by the baddy. I always wondered how that was possible. We've all witnessed the scene dozens of times, cars banging into one another at high speed until one goes over a cliff. And it seems to work every time. When this car takes its necessary nose dive onto the rocks at cliff bottom, of course it is not only wrecked but explodes in a fireball. (Not the only fireball in the movie.) That strikes me as a victory of the special effects people over the director and scriptwriters. Anyone who wants to see how the stunt should be believably pulled off, watch John Huston's "Mackintosh Man."

    And the movie leaves no doubt about who the good guys and bad guys are. It plumps on the side of the Israelis from beginning to end. Not that the chief baddy isn't given his chance, though. At the climax, Lambert holds a pistol in his face and says, "Enough is enough. We have killed the members of your family and you have killed my family. Enough killing." Does the bad guy nevertheless raise his pistol in an attempt to dispose of his worst enemy? Or does he throw his weapon down and walk away peacefully? Guess. Earlier there is even the Palestinian equivalent of the "good German" in those 1950s war movies who recognizes the futility of all this violence and cooperates with the proper authorities. Both sides kill women, but the Israelis do so only in self defense, and the woman is a complete stranger. The bad guy strangles a stunning blonde whom we've gotten to know and who definitely should not have been snuffed, and he murders her in cold blood.

    In sum: Nothing much new here. If it comes on late at night and you can't sleep, well -- give it a shot.
  • I was interested in watching this film in part because it was directed by John Glen, who had directed several James Bond movies in the 1980s that I had liked. However, after watching this movie, all I could think was that Glen's status as a director had fallen greatly in the years between James Bond and this film. To be fair, Glen was working with a script that really needed a few more rewrites before filming - the opening is kind of vague, the chief villain character is kind of vague, and various plot details here and there are vague as well. Despite this inadequate script, the movie could still have been fun with some energetic direction. But the movie is slow-moving and the few action sequences really lack zip and punch. Though this may have been in part due to the low budget, which also results in the movie having a somewhat cheap look and feel that resembles low budget Canadian television shows from the 1990s. To date, this is the final movie that Glen has directed. Maybe that's for the best.