Add a Review

  • Warning: Spoilers
    A Sci-Fi Channel Original directed by James D.R. Hickox. CGI that fails as much as it works. Hackneyed story that is watchable to the end. Cloning with remarkably fertile DNA, scientists create a vicious sabretooth tiger that escapes in transit. John Rhys-Davies fantasizes about being president and Vanessa Angel aspiring a Nobel Prize hire hunter deluxe David Keith to find the deadly animal before it rips more people apart. Jenna Gering and Josh Holloway are conducting an outdoors clinic that is interrupted by the ravenous predator. The tiger is to weight between 300 and 500 pounds, but the CGI placement has the creature various sizes. And by the way, what color is this sabretooth?

    Also in the cast: Nicole Tubiola, Lahmard J. Tate and Phillip Glasser. Keith is his usual cool and steady. Holloway appears to always be modeling.(Take him or leave him). But I found Tubiola to be the most exciting thing about this movie. Rhys-Davies and Tate are just plain obnoxious. And Angel most deservedly needed a rap across the chops.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I knew this was going to be pretty bad about five seconds in...when the first actor (Jenna G) kept looking right into the camera lens.

    Still I really like David Kieth so I kept going.

    Generally weak acting throughout,but not terrible.Story was OK..a saber tooth is genetically created...and guess what? it escapes and starts killing people...in comes hired hunter (David Kieth) to bring it down.

    The cgi looks unfinished and very hokey,"Ice Age" is what it reminded me of.

    The gore effects were pretty good,someone on that crew knew his gore.

    Spoiler sort off....

    It has a happy ending...so I raised my score by 1 point...not really worth watching.
  • RELEASED TO TV IN 2002 and directed by James D.R. Hickox, "Sabretooth" chronicles events when a saberetooth cat, cloned via fossilized DNA, is unleashed into the Big Bear Valley wilderness where it preys on vacationers and a group of trainee guides (led by Jenna Gering & Josh Holloway). The two responsible for creating the creature (Vanessa Angel &John Rhys-Davies) hire a great white hunter to capture it (David Keith).

    The beginning introduces the main cast and it's too goofy for its own good, particularly in regards to the trainee program group. But the story surprisingly gets compelling, despite the goofiness, and there's a great romantic scene between Holloway's character and Lola (Nicole Tubiola).

    The cast is likable (rounded out by Lahmard J. Tate and Phillip Glasser) and there's a nice assortment of females but, for me, they all lacked genuine sex appeal, except for maybe Steffanie Busey (Kara), who is overlooked because her part's so peripheral. It's a fun flick and the locations are great, but the creature is too cartoony to suspend disbelief when its head or body is clearly shown. They should've limited views to quick, partial looks, like they did in the first half.

    THE MOVIE RUNS 1 hour & 30 minutes and was shot in Big Bear Lake area, San Bernardino National Forest, California. WRITERS: Scott Vandiver (concept) & Tom Woosley (script).

    GRADE: C/C- (4.5/10)
  • Warning: Spoilers
    *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT*

    A sabretooth tiger gets loose in the woods. It's hungry. Famished. Hasn't eaten in centuries. It spots the usual gaggle of teens hiking and decides to chow down. A hunting party is formed to find it. The hot supermodel scientist, (aren't all geniuses beautiful?), demands that it be caught alive while the main hunter wants to take the sabretooth to the taxidermist. OOOHHH...Tension.

    This was a pretty efficient B-movie. They set the situation up quick: Monster, victims, woods. The sabretooth went to work on everybody. I enjoyed myself. There were two problems though. One, speaking as a horny lover of B-sleaze, I found it particularly depressing that there wasn't any unnecessary T&A. Many bosoms were heaving under tight T-shirts and yet no one felt the need to go skinny dipping. Shame. Second, the sabretooth digital effects were awful. I didn't once think that that was a sabretooth running around. The sabretooth looked like he escaped from a cartoon. The close ups of his head were all right but any scenes of the sabretooth in motion reeked of cheapness.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    A genetically-engineered sabretooth tiger, created to prove the viability of cloning human organs for medical research, gets freed when the truck carrying it crashes into a Californian park. The woman who created it & her boss decide to hire Thatcher, a hunter who has experience with big cats, to capture it, but tell him that he's hunting an African lion. Together they head off to track down & hopefully capture the tiger. But while they are tracking it, the sabretooth has some tracking of its own prey – a group of campers on a training course in the wilderness.

    James D. R. Hickox (who does a cameo in the film as a silent hillbilly playing cards) is a director who is the youngest son of Douglas Hickox, the director of the Vincent Price classic THEATRE OF BLOOD & the younger brother of Anthony Hickox of HELLRAISER III: HELL ON EARTH fame. James has followed his father & brother into the directing business & seems to specialise in B-grade monster flicks.

    Sabretooth is a most unusual JAWS knockoff. For one, it has a unique monster – a sabretooth tiger cloned for medical research. Sabretooth tigers (think Diego from the Ice Age films) lived & died out something like 10,000 years ago. They were known as exceptional killers & had teeth that were at least a foot long. I went into Sabretooth expecting a silly monster flick like the director's previous film, the monster crocodile film BLOOD SURF, which I have previewed recently. Well, it was silly at times but was a considerably better film than Blood Surf. James is improving his skill at this sort of thing.

    Sabretooth is not anything close to being a classic film but is an enjoyably silly & passable monster flick. The sabretooth is realised by close-up animatronic head & laughably mediocre CGI. The exercise is conducted in poker-face seriousness, which makes the antics on screen even more hilarious. Not just that, but the acting is good, with input from David Keith as the chisel-jawed hero of the piece & the legendary John Rhys-Davies, who has starred in classics like the Indiana Jones films & the Lord of the Rings trilogy, as well as numerous B-grade action & genre films like CYBORG COP to give an example. Speaking of Cyborg Cop, another of that film's actors makes an appearance in this one – Todd Jensen, who played one of the cyborgs in Cyborg Cop, does a cameo as a horny guy who gets ripped apart by the sabretooth through his front door. And it's quite hard to hate a film where a guy takes on the sabretooth in melee combat armed with a pair of knives. Hilariously silly monster hokum.
  • skychick17218 November 2002
    1/10
    Yawn!
    Apparently I was supposed to be scared; however, I couldn't stop laughing long enough to manage it. The writers created characters whose motto seems to be "when in danger or in doubt; run in circles...scream and shout" and don't have a shred of common sense between them. Also the producers need to ask the CGI people for a refund...that was the sorriest looking special effect I've seen in a while. I realize that this is not a big-budget production, but with the level of technology available they could have done much better.
  • eddax16 November 2002
    Another movie which uses the plot staple: "Let's throw a monster into the woods with a bunch of clueless people and see what happens." Coupled with a low budget for special effects, what you get is a lot of screaming ding-a-lings spontaneously developing mortal wounds. When you do see the tiger, it's very obviously CGI. Plot-wise, there's hardly anything that differentiates the sabretooth tiger in this movie from any other hungry mountain animal. Replace it and you can just as well call the movie 'Mountain Lion' (which it actually looks like), although that doesn't sound half as impressive. 1/10
  • Cheaply made Sci-Fi channel time filler which makes both humans and sabretooth tigers look like nitwits.

    David Keith and John Rhys-Davies are the only actors who you'll recognize, and for good reason. Everybody else look like they were grabbed from a middle school "Introduction to Drama" course, (which they all flunked). Even Davies struggles with the brainless greedy rich bozo cliché he is stuck with. How Keith kept a straight face amidst all this is anybody's guess.

    Somewhere, some scientist who saw Jurassic Park performs genetic restoration experiments or something, thus reproducing the imposing Ice Age beast, big teeth and all. The experiments fail to make the CGI monster look real, or to do a believable level of acting (well, he fits right in with his co-stars in that department). Keith plays a big game hunter who tries to hunt the thing, while your stock group of screaming group of stereotyped teens (nerd, jock, tramp, sexy intelligent girl, oversexed dumbbell guy etc.) camp nearby and say stupid stuff before they take turns getting munched. The hilarious scene of an idiot trying to fistfight/stab the creature is classic.

    Good for a laugh only.
  • Phillemos12 August 2006
    Warning: Spoilers
    Some random thoughts while watching Sabretooth: * Has SciFi Channel threatened to release incriminating photos of John Rhys-Davies if he doesn't accept roles in their movies? He's had a relatively distinguished acting career, yet every few months there he is, getting roped into starring in another bad SciFi Channel Original.

    * The creature effects are awful. The Sabretooth looks as if they took my friend's pet tabby cat Bob, stuck some canine teeth on him and followed him around the set with a magnifying glass. Thus, we always call this movie "Sabre-toothed Bob" * One redeeming quality this movie has going for it, is there are a lot of attractive actresses.

    Overall, this movie is pretty silly, but just barely interesting enough to keep you watching it.
  • This is a bad movie, with many acts of gross stupidity carried out by the badly drawn characters. Still, if you appreciate a good bad movie, then its worth a watch.

    Obviously someone behind this film was a big Predator fan, as several scenes bear striking resemblance. The creature view was pretty much a direct (if inferior) lift, as was the scene where the goofy token black kid hilariously fought the tiger on a log bridge. Of course, the fact that the cgi was so poor (as other reviews have alluded to) meant that any direct interaction with the creature was more like WFRR or SpaceJam, which is probably not a good thing.

    If anybody wants to see a film of this ilk, only good, I strongly recommend The Brotherhood of the Wolf (its foreign, but well worth watching even if your a subtitle-phobe). Sabretooth is really one for people who like cheesily bad films when theres nothing else on. Others (those with sense probably) should avoid.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Well, it's not Alien, but it wasn't as bad as I feared from the write-up. I was actually a bit disappointed it wasn't worse! I like crap films because, I guess, I like the way they torture you with their stupidity. But Sabretooth wasn't as dumb as, say Pterodactyl, so I was disappointed by this film, but for the wrong reason.

    Not that it doesn't have it's insult-my-intelligence moments. At the very start we see a janitor ripped to pieces in a room supposed to be beasts lair at th lab that created it. Quite why a JANITOR would be even allowed anywhere near such a project is beyond me, much less given the code to get into its lair. Also, the lair was spotless went he went into it - no straw, no faeces, no remains of previous meals - not even any fur or hair on the floor. And I won't even start on the flimsy doors that are supposed to stop this beastie getting into the lab proper.

    The CGI effects weren't too awful - still obviously CGI, but not bad.

    But they did rattle on (coincidentally, just as I was thinking "Why is this wild animal killing everything it comes across?) about how it was still growing and needed to eat every few hours or something. Funny though, how it apparently didn't need to eat whilst being transported in a crate on the back of a truck by some idiot. Some idiot, I might add, who had no idea what it was he was carrying. Would you honestly let some trucker transport such a specimen on his truck without sending someone knowledgeable along with it? I don't think so.

    All in all, it is pretty lame, but after the above scenes it settles down into the typical "foolish youngsters get eaten" type of story with the obligatory "mad scientist" thrown in for good measure.

    Not the worst film I've seen, but also not the best. Made bearable by the presence of Josh Holloway, John Rhys-Davies and Keith David.
  • OK, first thing's first: This is not high cinema. The special fx are laughable, the acting is ridiculous, and I could have written a better script over a sixer of Bud Light.

    That said, this is an awesomely entertaining movie because it so terrible. Laugh out loud funny. My friend was in tears because the special fx are so poorly done. I mean, 2002 was not that long ago and the creature effects are absurd.

    So, if you want a genuinely awesome bad movie experience, rent this movie... or be like me, and own it. You may want that sixer of Bud Light while you watch, though.
  • .... Is what the opening credits read . I beg to differ because I was under the impression that the concept of a prehistoric being resurrected into the present day where it feats on modern man was a concept invented by Michael Crichton . I also doubt if the concept of people getting stalked in a dark forest by a creature with a taste of human flesh is Mr Vandiver`s idea

    I`m prepared to ignore the above theory on concepts because SABRETOOTH is far more entertaining than it deserves to be . Vanessa Angel as a scientist ? John Rhys Davies as a Welshman with ambitions to become president of the USA ? You just know Scott Vandiver and co aren`t making a documentary and I`ll give them credit for making the victim list unpredictable . The first member of the hiking party we`re introduced to is a black teenager with a big mouth so right away I thought he`d be the first to get it , but then we`re introduced to a slutty looking latino girl which doubled the candidates for first person to become cat food , and then we`re introduced to the geeky Jewish lad who spends too much time on the computer and I bet you can`t guess who`s the first of this obvious trio to end up as lunch ?

    SABRETOOTH is a silly film but an entertaining one , so entertaining I`m prepared to forgive the awful CGI effects
  • super marauder22 November 2002
    Warning: Spoilers
    I watched this because there was nothing else on TV. Really, it wasn't too awful bad. The plot was pretty generic. A scientist creates a sabretooth tiger for the fame, the tiger escapes, eats some people, and the tiger is killed, the end.

    The trouble with TV movies is they don't have the mega-budgets that their big screen sisters have, so they make the best of what they have. In this case, you can clearly see the tiger is nothing more then a puppet, and computer animation, and you may have heard of these actors, but none of them are exactly marquee property. Of course, this is nothing new, and that's a good description of this movie.

    Over all, I enjoyed this movie, but had I saw it on the big screen as it is (especially at today's ticket prices) I would have been really ticked off, but as a TV movie it wasn't all that bad. It reminds me of the old 50s sci-fi flicks in many ways, only you don't see someone running around in a tiger suit, and lots of stock footage.
  • Still, it is much better than I anticipated, and a lot of fun to watch as it is pretty much a 1950s B-movie in plot and a 1970s eco-terror film in style. There isn't any letdown in action in this rather compact thriller, and not any moment was I bored. It's also nice to see David Keith use his considerable character-actor screen presence here, playing the part that would have gone to Patrick Wayne 25 years earlier, and doing it well. Everyone else is fairly adequate, though not at all outstanding, and perhaps it's because they're not supposed to upstage Keith and the creature. Though the creature effects are significantly lesser than what we now see from big studio productions, they are as good as many old-school animated or matte-effect creatures from 30, 40, and 50 yrs earlier. In the consideration of the time difference, this isn't much of a complement, but if this film can be enjoyed by a viewer on the level of such b-movies as, say, Monster that Challenged the World, it will be good entertainment.
  • Sabretooth was not a good or great movie, but considering SyFy's track record it was better than anticipated. Special effects aside, it is not bad visually, with some good scenery and well-shot scenes, the music does at least have a tempo and had some excitement and atmosphere and the acting while not award-worthy is better than average, John Rhys-Davies deserved a better character and dialogue but like all other conscientious actors he gives it his best. On the other hand, the special effects are really crude and fake-looking, while there is some wit the script is on the whole dull and cheesy, the story is formulaic with nothing especially exciting or suspenseful and the characters are underdeveloped stereotypes. All in all, better than I thought it'd be but still not a movie I recommend. 5/10 Bethany Cox
  • boogieman347221 November 2013
    so predictable... no scary moments at all. very phony... just terrible terrible terrible. I can't even think of enough words to fill the minimum 10 lines here. I couldn't wait for an ad to come on to watch to give me relief. Experienced mountaineers??? sure.... like going into caves while there's a 'mountain lion' on the loose. This was like going into Jason Voorhees' house knowing that he's out there somewhere lurking to trap you. Can't believe David Keith stooped so low to take this role... he must be really starving. I can't wait for Sabretooth-2 so I can read a good book. This 'movie' was so predictable... no scary moments at all. very phony... just terrible terrible very very horribly done. I can't even think of enough words to fill the minimum 10 lines here. I couldn't wait for an ad to come on to watch to give me relief. Experienced mountaineers??? sure.... like going into caves while there's a 'mountain lion' on the loose. This was like going into Jason Voorhees' house knowing that he's out there somewhere lurking to trap you. Can't believe David Keith stooped so low to take this role... he must be really starving lol. I can't wait for Sabretooth-2 so I can read a good book.
  • No way, this is a really bad movie... just like a millennium version of Roger Corman's, Samuel Z. Arkoff's or Ed Wood's monster oddities from the Fifties and Sixties... a bunch of scientists are fighting a genetic built sabretooth tiger on a lonely island... yawn, another Jurassic Park rip-off, but really, really bad this time.

    The story is dull, the actors seem to be cast from the spot with no acting experiences at all, although movie veteran David Keith has the "honor" to play the big hunter here... his girlfriend, the mad female scientist, is played by Vanessa Angel, who tries to threaten the monster tiger with words like "Piss off!" and has offending silicon lips that make even Ann Nicole Smith look naturally. There's another young couple with a sweet blonde who looks a bit like Poppy Montgomery and wears sexy shorts all the time, but that's not scaring the evil tiger, too.

    The worst thing about this movie is the really badly animated sabretooth tiger that looks like an early computer draft of an update for the Jungle Book's Balu or like an early nineties' video game animation or Kyoto Date internet avatar... every movement of this paper tiger looks so artificial and ridiculous that you expected our frightened heroes to burst out in laughter every second of the film...

    In the end of the movie... well, I guess you know what happens, but after having watched this nonsense you'd certainly like to see that fifty-year old monster highlights of Jack Arnold like "Tarantula" or "The Creature of the Black Lagoon" again that have much more thrills and better special effects than everything in this c-movie. Recommended for a good laugh only!
  • Vikki_C25 March 2003
    I really liked the low quality way that the ST Tiger was created. I have seen better graphics on a Spectrum 48K.

    The best bits were the gruesome deaths. I especially enjoyed seeing the ST sink its big pointy teeth into the head of some bloke.

    Oh no, the best bit was that during a particularly un-scary part, my cat leaped on the bed and nearly scared me to death.

    Looking forward to the sequel....
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Sabretooth is set in the remote Californian mountain wilderness where Senior camp counsellor Casey Ballenger (Jenna Gering) has the task of training up some Junior camp counsellors in readiness for a big camping trip, Casey takes them deep up into the mountain terrain to give them hands on experience & training. Meanwhile a flatbed truck crashes nearby on a mountain road & the container it was carrying breaks open releasing a five foot high genetically created Sabretooth Tiger into the mountain wilderness, hungry for food the unlucky Casey & her charges end up at the top of it's menu. Genetic scientist Catherine Viciy (Vanessa Angel) who created the Sabretooth, her boss Anthony (John Rhys-Davis) & big game hunter Bob Thatcher (David Keith) are on the Sabretooth's trail but will they find it in time & even if they do can they take it down?

    Directed by James D.R. Hickox who also has a cameo in the film as 'Silent Bob' whoever that is Sabretooth is yet another genetic experiments gone wrong 'Creature Feature' of the sort that the Sci-Fi Channel play all the time & to be blunt it's absolutely terrible in every way, shape & form. Sabretooth is nothing more than the usual collection of 'Creature Feature' clichés strung together around the (very) basic central concept of a Sabretooth Tiger on the loose, there's the genetic experiments gone wrong, there's the cold scientist who doesn't care about anything but the experiment, there's a big game hunter brought in to track & capture the beast, there's the cardboard cutout collection of teenage victims who constantly find obscure reasons to split up including a macho hero, a strong female, a black dude, a good looking but shallow chick & some annoying comedy relief nerd, there's plenty of running around doing nothing in particular & the storyline here is really poor. There's no background given to the experiments at all, there isn't even a token explanation about how the Sabretooth Tiger was created (other than it was a genetic experiment) or why (why not clone a friendly animal?) & the constant wandering around a forest with noting in particular happening gets very boring very fast. Although Sabretooth only lasts around 90 odd minutes it feels a lot longer as the plot really does drag, virtually nothing happens apart from some Sabretooth Tiger stalking some teens in a forest & even that is done in the most tedious way possible with no pace or flair or humour or surprises & it's just a terrible film that I don't even want to think about anymore.

    Usually these low budget 'Creature Features' have terrible CGI computer effects & Sabretooth doesn't buck the trend at all, when the Sabretooth is finally seen in all it's CGI glory you'll probably laugh out loud at how bad it looks & how badly it's animated. It just looks terrible from the colour to it's movements to it's interaction with it's live action surroundings. There are a few shots of a Sabretooth puppet animatronic head which looks better than the CGI effect but still doesn't impress & doesn't really match up with the CGI effects either. So the CGI special effects are terrible but is there any gore or nudity? Well no there isn't which makes Sabretooth even more of a chore to sit through, there's no pay-off as any of the (awful) character's are killed & there's no nudity either so what is the point of this awful, awful film? Anwers on a postcard please because I can't think of one.

    Production wise remove the awful CGI effects & Sabretooth is competent yet forgettable, filmed on location in Big Bear Valley National Park in California the stunning forest mountain locations are totally wasted & Sabretooth looks as if it could have been shot in my local woods. The cast features once respected actors David Keith & John Rhy-Davis slumming it & the ever awful Vanessa Angel who as expected is awful.

    Sabretooth is a terrible 'Creature Feature' that encompasses everything that is awful about the genre, terrible CGI effects, a lame predictable by-the-numbers plot, clichéd character's, no nudity or gore whatsoever despite an 'R' rating & awful logic & plot holes galore. Sabretooth is terrible in every way & that's all I can really say about it.
  • What is it with SciFi, when they produce films as bad as this? Why not concentrate on creating a decent movie for a change, instead of putting out a string of badly-written, badly-acted, illogical, even stupid, CGI crapfests like this one? The director and writer of this BOMB seemingly have nothing but contempt for the intelligence of the audience; the actions of the characters and their dialogue might be clever and entrancing to 6-year-olds, but for everyone else, AVOID THIS SCREAMING TURKEY, which is almost as bad as that other CGI nightmare "Blue Demon"...a film even Ed Wood would have been ashamed to be affiliated with.

    There is no need to go into detail regarding this particular farce; just remember every stupid, low-budget, idiotic, horrible film you've ever seen, and you have a good idea of how bad this thing is; the writer and director and most of the actors should be forced to eat their own intestines while viewing it, particularly the Rambo-type who gets his at the entrance to the mine.

    The only reason I could not give a lower rating to this BOMB is because no negative numbers were available.

    AVOID THIS FILM UNLESS YOU ARE A HARDENED MASOCHIST!
  • One of the worst movies I've ever seen. The story can be said in few words "Mad scientist woman recreates ancient sawtooth tiger killing people". The dialogues of the protagonists are without life, the actors miss to show emotions especially right after a dangerous situations. The bad guy among the human actors besides the sabretooth which is also bad is dumb instead being a brilliant but bad counterweight to the hero - actually also the sympathetic hero is missing. This is unconventional, which is so far not a bad thing, but instead of presenting alternatives to this classic dramaturgy the movie became very flat. The special effects are thin and unrealistic - the sabretooth appears very artificial due to wrong light effects. Since I have already seen at least some of the actors act much better, it appears to me that the film director has probably managed to make the worst out of an already dumb storybook. The end of the movie contains neither surprise nor relief - probably just anger having wasted almost two hours.
  • I watched this movie a few nights ago and was pleasantly surprised. I was expecting a god-awful film with lame characters, worse dialogue and little or no shots of the creature.

    The plot is formulaic of course, but if you're looking for a movie that's so bad it's good this is a good one to watch. The opening is a real stinker that'll have you rolling on the floor.

    The creature in CGI form is laughable in most shots (especially the first) but isn't all that bad for a low budget flick. The animatronic creature looks surprisingly good. The gore isn't half bad either. John Rys-Davies is a good an actor as always and makes up for the less than perfect performances by the others.

    The movie is chalk full of laughs; intentional or not, they are great.

    In one of the few indoor shots, the lighting is set up so bad that poor Mr. Davies is sweating like a pig under the heat, his forehead shining like a light bulb. The hired hunter carries in his armament a "tranquilizer gun" that is obviously a cheapo paintball gun they probably picked up from Wal-mart. There is a totally cheesy battle between the cat and a knife wielding camper. It's great. Oh, and watch for the nod to Kevin Smith.

    This movie is totally worth your time if you're a fan of bad but satisfying films. I will proudly display this in my collection.
  • (There are Spoilers) Your usual monster from the past coming to a theater, or DVD outlet, near you with a ferocious 500 plus pound saber-tooth tiger-minus its stripes-being brought back to life via DNA genetic engineering. The two persons responsible for the saber-tooth's resurrection multi-millionaire and presidential hopeful, or so he hopes, Anthony Bricklin, John Rhys-Davis, and his lover and assistant DNA and genetic engineer Catherine Vicly, Venessa Angel, have no idea in what a Frankenstein, or Tony the Tiger, monster they created until it was too late.

    With the saber-tooth escaping from his confinement, when the truck that he was caged in overturned, he goes straight into he wilds of the Nortern California mountains and runs into this troop of outdoor guides lead by the beautiful and well built, she has to be in tip top shape for the job she's doing, Casey Balenger, Jenna Gering. Wanting to take the big cat alive both Catherine and Brickin get big game hunter Bob Thatcher, David Keith, to hunt the killer feline down but a with a tranquilizer, not a super elephant, gun.

    The killer cat using his superior sense of smell and hunting ability has no trouble at all finding his prey, which seems to be exclusively humans, and in no time at all almost wipes out and eats the entire cast in the movie. Thatcher who's about the only person in the film who has a chance to bring down the saber-tooth is handicapped by both Catherine and Bricklin who want the beast to be taken alive not dead in order to get both rich and farther their careers in politics and science. Bricklin feels the cat, with the money he gets from exhibiting it, will get him elected president and Catherine, in her creating it out of 10,000 year old DNA matter, the Nobel Prize in biological research. The only thing these two deluded lunatics end up getting is having themselves served up as the big cat's lunch and dinner!

    ***SPOILERS*** Not as bad at it at first seemed with the killer cat after being practically invisible, we only get to see glimpse of him, for almost the entire film coming out into the open and really doing a number, with his foot long canines, on everyone that he both runs and bites into. Thatcher despite his best efforts as a big game hunter is stymied by both Bricklin & Catherine, in bringing the big cat down, who want to prevent him from doing his job not knowing, or even caring, that if he did they would live to see the end of the movie. It was Thatcher who finally put this indestructible killer away not with the modern and sophisticated weapons that he had at his disposal but with what the cave man used to both fend it off and kill it some 10,000 years ago!
  • piray17 November 2002
    A fun way to spend a Saturday evening with a sleep-over grandson. The special effects were pretty lame, but it had a scary story and fairly interesting characters. A bit gory in spots, but most little boys think that's cool. My little guy gave it a two thumbs up. I wouldn't recommend it for those under eight years of age.
An error has occured. Please try again.