Add a Review

  • joaocruzferreira26 September 2007
    Directed by the legendary Sir Alan Parker, this is the story of David Gale, a University of Texas professor of philosophy against capital punishment who is accused of murdering a fellow activist and is sent to death row.

    Kevin Spacey and Laura Linney deliver great performances in the flashbacks. This movie is by far one of Spacey's strongest performances, he is always very subtle and insightful portraying David Gale. Laura Linney really makes a name for herself in this motion picture, she's as consistently complex and likable here as she is in "Primal Fear" and "You Can Count on Me". Kate Winslet, however, has problems in carefully crafting her character. She's called upon to cry about four or five times in this film and each time she does so, the action unfortunately rings more and more false. Other than that, she is average. Meanwhile, Gabriel Mann, Leon Rippy and Matt Craven also provide colorful backdrops to the story at hand with their credible supporting characters.

    "The Life of David Gale" is a film that had a great opportunity to create controversy about the death penalty. Unfortunately, it is excessively underrated by critics, despite being nominated for the Human Rights Award from the Political Film Society and being present at the prestigious Berlin International Film Festival.

    Sad and stunning. 8/10
  • Ive been reading some of the user comments here on IMDB, and am a little stunned that most of them didnt really get the plot, and therefore shouldnt really comment on how "bad" it is. Like Winslet not having any chance in understanding the plot, thats the entire point of the movie, and if you didnt get that, you should not comment on how "bad" it is.

    This movie is by far Spacey's strongest performance since the magical Se7en. Actually, all leading actors gives amazing performances in this movie that has a plot taken out from heaven. It will leave you moping, gasping for air. Giving Hollywood stick for a "too complicated script" is silly, since its far too seldom Hollywood actually offers a script like this. I would rather welcome that fact, than be mad about it.

    If you feel you have what it takes to crack this puzzle before it unveals, go see this movie instantly, and be prepared to be taken on a journey.
  • Kevin Spacey stars as David Gale, a life long campaigner against the death penalty finds himself on death row after being found guilty of the rape and murder of a fellow anti-execution campaigner. Kate Winslet is the reporter who interviews Gale during his last three days and she is convinced of his guilt and need to be executed, but as she interviews Gale she begins to question his guilt.

    This was a great story very well told without deteriorating into a 'execution is wrong' lecture. And as usual, Kevin Spacey's performance is fantastic. Because of the twists and the amount of after-thought it provoked, I give 'The Life of David Gale' 8/10.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    `No one who looks through that glass sees a person, they see a crime. I'm not David Gale, I'm a murderer and a rapist, four days shy of his execution,' exclaims Gale (Kevin Spacey) to reporter Bitsey Bloom (Kate Winslet) on one of his last few days of life. While Gale might be right, no one who looks at The Life of David Gale on the silver screen sees a movie, they see a work of art. This isn't The Life of David Gale, this is one of the most meaningful and insightful films created in years. Its gripping screenplay, brilliant acting and creative cinematography explores one of America's most pressing issues in a captivating manner.

    David Gale, top of his Harvard class, was Texas' leading death penalty abolitionist and professor at the University of Austin. Now on death row for the rape and murder of his best friend, Constance Hallaway (Laura Linney), reporter Bitsey Bloom interviews Gale on his last three days of life. The film is produced as a series of flashbacks exploring Gale's intriguing life and the crime he allegedly committed.

    Gale was written by former Vienna philosophy professor and first-time screenwriter, Charles Randolph. The story is full of remarkable twists and turns constantly forcing the viewers to change their thoughts on who committed the murder. The film is packed with memorable lines, both serious and humorous. When city-savvy Bloom and her intern, Zack, first arrive in small-town Huntsville, Bloom remarks, `You know you're in the Bible belt when there are more churches than Starbucks.' Zack adds, `More prisons than Starbucks.' When Bloom first meets Gale, the prison guards seem unnecessarily rude toward Gale. He remarks `they are practicing being cruel and unusual.' In a flashback, Gale describes the pro-death penalty Texas Governor as being `in touch with his inner frat boy.'

    The strongest part of the script occurs toward the end of the film when Bloom begins a race against time to discover what really happened at the crime scene. The last ten seconds expand the film's meaning into a questioning of the purpose of life. This theme is brilliantly touched upon in earlier segments of the movie. During a flashback of Gale teaching his U of A class, he lectures `The only way we can judge the value of our own lives is by valuing the lives of others.' In our hollow world of How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days, Bringing Down the House and Old School comes this film that is truly meaningful.

    While the overall script was extremely powerful, it did have one significant weak moment. On the night before Gale's execution, Bloom discovers some odd occurrences at the crime scene. Instead of spending the night investigating, she goes to sleep. The following morning is a battle against the clock to determine if Gale is guilty; she finally realizes the truth just a few minutes before the execution. The plot would have been notably more gripping if Bloom had spent the night working on the case instead of snoring. Mr. Randolph: Certainly not bad for your first screenplay; it is worthy of keeping you off this reviewer's death row.

    Each actor was ideally selected for their respective roles (George Clooney was originally solicited for Spacey's role; thank God he turned it down). Spacey's role as Gale was one of the best in his career. Much of his offbeat, sarcastic and monotonous American Beauty voice seems to emerge when Gale first meets Bloom and explains why he called for her. One of Spacey's best lines ever uttered occurs later in the film when he tries to convince Bloom that he is innocent. He shouts, `I used to be the state's leading death penalty abolitionist and now I'm on death row. Doesn't that strike you as a little odd?' Another memorable Spacey scene occurs in a flashback at the U of A when a seductive female student, Berlin, pleads for a higher grade. Gale approaches Berlin and whispers in her ear, `Okay Berlin, I will give you a good grade, a very good grade, if you would just. study.'

    British actress Kate Winslet flawlessly pulls off an American accent throughout the entire film. Winslet's tones of voice and minute expressions reveal a dynamic change in her personality from when she first arrives in Texas to when she leaves. She enters Huntsville conscious of her status and hardened from city life. `I'm a reporter, you're an intern,' she explains to Zack when they first arrive at the scene. Later, she becomes so immersed in Gale's story that she nearly suffocates herself when trying to reenact the murder sequence. This occurs when Bloom infiltrates the crime scene and secures a plastic bag over her head with duct tape to determine how long a person can survive without air.

    Director Allan Parker took this powerful screenplay and perfect cast and created Gale in a strikingly different fashion. Parker worked with both Director of Photography Michael Seresin and Editor Gerry Hambling in 1999 to create the depressing, slow tale of old Ireland in Angela's Ashes. Considering Gale was done with the same key crew members, you would think that there would be strong correlations between the two productions, but this was not the case. Gale explores present-day issues in a fast paced, suspenseful thriller. Parker uses a fresh and different film technique when going between present-day and flashbacks. The camera seems to be spinning 360 degrees as the film cuts between present-day, the flashback and graphics of a variety of buzz words (like `death,' `truth,' `power,' `love,' etc.) until the flashback phases out the other footage.

    Parker masters the technique of intercutting to convey meaning. On the day of Gale's execution, Parker rapidly cuts between the jail cook preparing his last meal, reporters discussing the execution, Bloom trying to tell the world of her findings and finally, Gale walking down the hall toward the death room. These visuals, along with the frantic track, `Media Frenzy,' portray the extreme sense of tension. Similarly, in a flashback, shots of Gale having sex with a student at a party are rapidly intercut with the fast-paced dancing of the other partygoers. Parker smartly conveys emphasis through juxtaposing striking images following a scene. After Gale utters to Bloom, `I'm running out of time,' the film cuts to a steak sizzling at a nearby barbecue. Parker is comparing Gale's hopeless and desperate situation to frying dead meat.

    The Life of David Gale is a truly remarkable film, one that will force tears out of your eyes and cause your knees to shake throughout the entire 130 minutes. This absolutely riveting film will leave you thinking, for a long time, about the purpose of the death penalty and about the meaning of human life. Beware: The film is so thought-provoking that it just may change your stance on the death penalty issue.
  • Don't be put off by one movie critic's assessment (morally dishonest, no stars) of this film - he just didn't "get it." This character driven murder mystery is one of the decade's best! Definitely four stars!

    The layered conflicts drive the story forward like a Mack truck careening down the side of a mountain, making the movie seem much shorter than its 130 minutes. Kevin Spacey's compelling portrayal of David Gale, a brilliant, principled man with more than his share of human flaws and bad luck, is excellent and is surely Oscar material.

    The story begins four days before Gale's execution in a Texas prison. Gale is finally breaking his years of silence by agreeing to tell his side of the story to news-magazine reporter, Bitsey Bloom. Skeptical that this Death Row inmate is out to convince her, and the world, of his innocence, Bitsey takes the assignment expecting it to be a typical, no-brainer.

    Gale's story is told in a series of tightly choreographed flashback sequences, each building in character, motive and momentum toward an exciting and most unexpected conclusion.

    The story also puts a very fine point on the debate over the death penalty and gives its audience something to talk & think about on the way home.

    Not since "Presumed Innocent" have I been so deliciously unable to predict an ending! It is a pleasure to leave the theater feeling completely happy about having invested the price of my ticket in this movie! It is two hours very well spent.
  • Smells_Like_Cheese23 February 2003
    10/10
    Wow
    "The Life of David Gale" is a terrific thriller and is one of the best of 2003. Despite going to this movie through the worst date of my life... shudder, I still have nightmares, this movie was the silver lining. I was very excited to see this movie because it has such an awesome actor, obviously Kevin Spacey and then a great actress Kate Winslet.

    This political thriller keeps you on the edge of your seat and keeps you guessing what's going to happen next. Wither you're for or against or undecided about the death penalty, this movie gets to you and keeps you thinking after wards about our justice system in the United States. David Gale is an accused murderer on death row, his last few days he requests to be interviewed by Bitsey Bloom, a journalist who likes to keep her mouth shut even when she shouldn't. He tells her his incredible story about from being one of the most respected men in Texas to one of the most hated for being accused of rape.

    "No one sees a person when they look through that glass, they see a murderer and a rapist three days shy of his execution". Is he guilty or not? Trying to figure this out in the story you jump to your own conclusion, this man has been accused of rape, murder, he's lost his family and friends. Take away everything and find out if people just overlook cases or if we should judge the first minute we hear one side of the story. The Life of David Gale is an amazing story that will keep you interested. Just trust me, it's a great movie. I can even watch it without having nightmares about my horrific date. :) OK, just watch it.

    10/10
  • The Life of David Gale (2003)

    Whether you are pro or anti death penalty, there's not getting past the sensational, brave, and maybe insane elements of this story. Based on fact about a death row inmate who had been famous as a death row protester, the core of the movie is how a young reporter (a convincing Kate Winslet) interviews the inmate (an equally convincing Kevin Spacey) in the days before his scheduled execution. We are gradually shown the backstory through their interviews, and another story builds as the reporter chases down new leads, including missing video evidence. Laura Linney plays an important third lead that starts to throw doubts into everyone's mind, including the audience's.

    All of this sounds like a great movie should have come out of it: superb casting and acting, a great story with believable but astounding twists, and a nice tight framework, day by day, with methodical flashbacks. Instead the movie both tries too hard and fumbles some of the key moments. What is clearly dramatic is sometimes made over-dramatic (Winslet running and running and running, or words like "innocent" spinning across the screen between scenes). Other sensationalist add-ons make the movie cheap (seeing a chaingang neatly working along the road just as they drive by). And simple reactions aren't believable (they way characters respond to someone following them, or to other threats). This is important stuff for a movie trying to recreate the truth.

    By my guess, the director is the key suspect, though he has a raft of successful films behind him, including the closest echo, Midnight Express (1978), which is about injustice and a prisoner who is extraordinary. But in all his films (that I've seen, which is quite a few, it turns out), there is a feeling of powerful story line carrying the day (Mississippi Burning, Birdy). Parker has also made a series of films tied to contemporary music, from Evita which is fair to The Commitments which is terrific fun, as well as The Wall, which might be his best film in all, though a difficult one. All of these films have a great setting, either musically or geographically.

    Here we have only the dull backdrop of conservative Texas (if that's not redundant). And a blazing, heartwrenching story. Which is fair enough as a start. The Life of David Gale is a powerful morality tale, most of all, with some great acting, and many or most people watching will be glad they saw it. All those little flaws fade further and further as you get toward the end.

    And then the end, the famous big final twist. That's memorable stuff. Wow.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    You may think this film is a thriller about the death penalty, but it is not. It looks like it, true, but the end reveals it is something completely different. It is about the way the media can be manipulated in any direction, provided you are intelligent. Once a brilliant university professor was confronted in a TV debate to the governor of Texas about the death penalty. The governor asked him to give the name of one executed person that was innocent and could be proved so. The professor could not answer such a question for the simple reason that there is no post mortem investigation in the case of an execution, except… And the professor started, with his main assistant in his fight against the death penalty, to think of how to prove that point. In the mean time he is tricked by some dumb girl student into doing exactly what he should never have done: have sex with her. She sue him for rape, even if later she will drop the charge. The damage is done. He is kicked out of academia. His wife takes his son away and gets a divorce. She sells the house. He cannot even get a job as the manager of a technical store. He is reduced to nothing, to being a rapist forever. But he does not want to move. His main assistant in his fight is going to die of leukemia. When he learns that, the plan to trap the governor germinates in their minds and they put it through. He is going to be accused of the murder of his assistant though it is not a murder. The evidence it is not is a tape, the recording of what really happened. But it will come in three pieces. The man will be sentenced to death. Three days before his execution he asks a famous journalist from New York to come and take the first and last interview he is going to give her in six hours spread out over the three days before his execution. The first excerpt of the tape we have mentioned will turn up in the journalist's motel room on the second day, before execution, too short and a copy. Worthless. Then after some adventure the journalist manages to recuperate what she thinks is the whole tape that proves what she was thinking, after some personal experimentation, is right: the woman killed herself, but who worked the camera? A man that is seen at the end of the tape, a man the journalist has seen here and there and in whose shack she has found the tape. But that too is too short though not worthless. It creates havoc and it proves an innocent man can be sentenced to death. During that time the $500,000 for the interview travel to Mexico and the ex-wife for the son. The father had been vindicated in the mean time. But the journalist finally receives the last excerpt of the tape, the end of the suicidal demonstrative séance and there the professor is shown coming at this very moment, just after the death of the woman, just as if he had been behind the camera all the time and he turns that camera off, after checking the woman is dead. The media had been manipulated about the guilt of the man and about the fairness and justice of the death penalty, then about the man's innocence and the suicide of the woman, and yet the truth was that the death had been planned in such a way that the execution would demonstrate how an innocent person can be sentenced to death. Manipulation all along by a woman who wanted to make her natural death useful for the cause she advocated and by a man who did not have the courage to move on and start a new life after having been destroyed by an unscrupulous student and by his own dumbness: students are out of reach as long as they are within grading distance. He preferred to make his death (which becomes a very special suicide) useful for the cause he advocated and for his own son. But the film is short because two men helped the woman and staged her death and the man lied all along the way of his confession and ordeal. The media are so naïve that they believe anything provided it smells slightly sulfurous or sulfuric.

    Dr Jacques COULARDEAU, University Paris 1 Pantheon Sorbonne, University Versailles Saint Quentin en Yvelines, CEGID
  • Warning: Spoilers
    You look at the cast. An award-winning cast in front of and behind the camera. You look at the genre. Crime drama. Sounds promising? You look at the length. At over 2 hours running time, you possibly have some doubts, since so few films in the history of the medium have managed to sustain interest at that length, but, you tell yourself, with such credentials, how can you go wrong? Well, the answer is, it is easier than it looks, for this is a very flawed film, with major timing, casting, and writing problems, that succeeds (ie, remains reasonably entertaining and suspenseful) in spite of itself. And painfully so. Interestingly, the film itself is a throwback to an era a few decades earlier (the 80s) when "trick endings" or "messing with the audience's head" was more popular. There is a reason that kind of film died. Ironically, for a story which itself is about opposing capital punishment, the production of this specific film is proof that these sorts of twisty-turny stories really should be euthanized before film is ever loaded in the camera. The first 20 minutes of the film (literally) is one movie by itself, full of great acting, dialog, and promise. Then, at the 20 min mark, Kevin Spacey's character comes onboard and immediately there are issues. It is not so much that he does a bad job, as it is the casting. The role is the antithesis of the type of role Spacey usually plays (meek and innocent as opposed to powerful and evil) and this creates a "disconnect" with the viewer that becomes progressively more uncomfortable as the film winds down the overlong road it has chosen. The killer (of the film, not of the script) is the last 20 minutes, where (effectively) a third movie starts, completely different from the first two. By this stage the audience feels on a subliminal level like a chicken being plucked and headed for the pot. Clearly, there is something going on here, the dialog and action reveals, but you won't know what until the very end, until the Big Reveal.

    In past reviews, this reviewer has been very critical of films that attempt to succeed based almost entirely because of their ability to mess with the audience. This film is no exception to that stance. Overlong, and structurally very damaged, the end result I believe is but a shadow of what the director originally intended. In other words, an experiment gone bad. With hindsight, it is astounding that the film holds interest at all.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    *** SPOILERS WITHIN ***

    *** SPOILERS WITHIN ***

    *** SPOILERS WITHIN ***

    I just returned from this movie, and I can say without a doubt this is one of the most thought-provoking films I have seen, not just about the death penalty, but about other things: the strength of people's beliefs, how far they're willing to go to achieve them, how they want to be remembered, what qualifies as a "good" life, and most importantly the choices we make in life.

    People who come out of this movie seeing this as merely a piece against the death penalty are missing out on the deeper issues within this film. The issue of the death penalty, while certainly an important one, is not what this movie is about. This movie is about the things previously mentioned.

    In the film, David Gale is a philosophy professor and in a flashback we see him before he is on death row, giving a lecture to his class. He says that one's life is not about his or her dreams, but about the choices made, moments which show true character. And later on, we see how one choice, a moment of weakness, can ruin all those that came before and set in motion everything else that follows.

    The thing which most impressed me was the strength of Mr. Gale's beliefs. To sit on death row for six years, knowing what he knows, and to remain silent all that time, knowing the consequences if he speaks. That more than anything is a testament to the conviction of his beliefs, a conviction that I know I don't have.

    I just saw this film, and I was so impressed and moved that I'm considering seeing it again. This is a movie that will stick with me a long time.
  • If you're a fan of Kevin Spacey's, you will not be let down by "The Life of David Gale." Do not read reviews. Do not watch stuff about it on television. Just go see it and experience it for yourself. It's not a perfect film by any stretch (as many, MANY critics have been pointing out), but it does grab you and it does deliver.
  • The awkward title seems to be stating that "life" is the theme here and it is. The taking of a life and the destruction of ones life by a force with an agenda. David Gale's life is ruined by a false accusation of rape and then it is about to be taken by a (could be) false accusation of murder.

    On death row awaiting execution we are about to find out if that death penalty law is fatally flawed. The audience is shown in flashbacks exactly what happened and for that part of the movie it is a mystery with an investigative reporter following up with help from an exclusive interview with the condemned.

    The Director's dark cynical style is somewhat restrained here, but this film is more about a cause than an artistic cause celeb. It is an obvious anti death penalty slant and uses melodrama to make its point.

    It is a well acted, well written story and is about more than it seems. There are other things going on here that are much more personal than a political and social controversy of religion vs humanism. It touches on infidelity, parental custody, alcoholism, martyrdom, euthanasia, sexism, lost causes, betrayal, and obsession.

    The movie has humor and heart, a noble attempt and a righteous rant on a law (capital punishment) that is obviously morally controversial, but is also not the law in some States. That seems to be the answer the narrative is presenting. If we as a Nation can't agree on something as final as putting someone to death by the authorities, than we as a Nation should error on the side of caution.
  • enricoshapka12 December 2021
    Warning: Spoilers
    The first hour is intriguing but the rest of the film becomes boring. At first I didn't understand the final and what really happened. After I searched it basically he helped the woman to suicide and then he got accused on purpose to be killed too on his accusation. All of this to demonstrate that there's errors in justice system. This whole thing is pretty lame, even if he wasn't the one that killed or raped her, he helped and assisted her in doing so. Killing himself to prove that the system will fail is pointless.
  • It is strange how much this movie was ignored. It doesn't rank on many critics top 10 list and it wasn't a huge box office success anyway. Weird considering it is one of Kevin spacey's best performances. I almost cried at the end so the movie achieved what it set out to achieve.

    The movie is about a man named David Gale(Kevin Spacey) who is a philosophy professor and also a anti-death penalty campaigner. He was arrested some time ago and convicted on the crime of raping and murdering a fellow death penalty campaigner named Constance(the gorgeous Laura Linney). He has been given a death sentence. He asks for a reporter during his last week to tell the real story supposedly. That reporter is Bitsey Bloom(Kate winslet) who shows a genuine disinterest at first towards the case but who has a reputation of reporting on difficult and controversial stories. Bitsey bloom travels with her partner Zack to the facility where Gale is held.

    The movie has many twists and turns showing the collapse of David Gale's life as he changes from respected philosophy professor to an ostracised man because of some events in his life. These scenes are quite sad and depressing and Gale doesn't have many friends who stand by him in the hour of need. The way the movie flows is actually quite excellent and the revelation in the middle is quite surprising. It doesn't seem like a gimmick and that's where the movie triumphs.

    The performances are quite amazing. Kevin Spacey as David Gale has given one of the best performances in his career and Laura Linney as Constance is cute,smart and amazingly compassionate. Kate winslet as Bitsey Bloom also gives a great performance as a woman who starts off as indifferent to the case but then transforms into a woman who feels genuine sympathy for the plight of David Gale. The background music is also quite amazing and this is one of the best in movies. At the very least it should have gotten an award for this category. The music at certain points is quite emotional and towards the end it is one of the reasons for the beautiful climax.

    The only problem I have might be the rewatchability factor. I think I might not watch it again. Maybe because it is too depressing. But it should be definitely watched by people who are interested in the issue of death penalty and its accompanying ethical questions. The questions raised by David Gale in the interview with the Texas governor are one of the best examples. That scene alone is enough for people to watch this movie. The movie is also an example of how one mistake changes the life of a respected person in society and how quickly things can change in life if we are not careful about everything we do. So in essence it is not just a movie for death penalty campaigners and those who are interested in the concept of death penalty. But it is also a movie for people who are interested in human nature in general.

    9/10
  • Kevin Spacey deserves another one OSCAR nomination for this movie while supporting cast is not such creative except maybe Laura Linney.

    Alan Parker is back with stunning material - provoking and sophisticated. This movie makes me think about world we live and life in general. I'm not an expert in capital punishment issue, but acting of Spacey is superb and deeply touching. This is not usual stupid Hollywood popcorn movie and thank You for that. My personal rating is 10 out of 10.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    For all the rhetoric that this film spews against capital punishment, you'd think the film would be smarter in convincing us that the death penalty doesn't work. SPOLIERS... We discover in the end that EVERYONE Gale, Constance, Duffy and the lawyer are ALL in on it, on this "greater cause" of abolishing the death penalty. Thus, the characters purposely "botch" the appeal process--the very same appeal process that, in its redundancy, is in place to assure that innocent people are not executed. You're allowed to file appeals, good lawyers do this. And if you don't like your lawyer, you can fire him and get another one and keep appealing, so that if you are indeed innocent, the truth will come out. But David Gale and company, because of their supposed greater cause, because he had to be a martyr, PURPOSELY botched this process and he thus, he gets executed. What does that prove? It certainly doesn't prove that the death penalty executes innocent people? He LET HIMSELF get executed. Had he NOT botched it, the truth may have come out--or at the very least, he would've gotten life instead of death. Also, had Gale shown his estranged wife the post-card from the woman who accused him of rape, THE MOMENT he received it, she would've seen that he was innocent. But no, it's more "dramatic" to send it WHEN HE'S DEAD! So he selfishly gave up a life with his own son to do this. That's not love, that's fundamentalism. Ugggh. This is the problem with liberal hollywood... they're so blinded by their own warped ideology that they miss the obvious truth right in front of them.
  • The journalist Bitsey Bloom (Kate Winslet) is invited by the former professor and director of the philosophy section at Austin University convicted to death David Gale (Kevin Spacey) to have a private and exclusive interview with him for her newspaper for the fees of US$ 500,000.00. David Gale was accused of rape and murder of his colleague and friend Constance Harraway (Laura Linney). They both were activists of the movement against death penalty in Texas called the Deathwatch. Bitsey goes to Texas with the intern Zack Stemmons (Gabriel Mann) and along the three days of close contact with David, she finds the truth behind the whole accusation. This movie is another excellent dramatic thriller of Alan Parker. Having a great screenplay full of plot points and having Kate Winslet, Kevin Spacey and Laura Linney leading a wonderful cast, it is a must-see film. The surprising end is stunning. My vote is ten.

    Title (Brazil): ` A Vida de David Gale' (`The Life of David Gale')
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Possible Spoilers

    The Life of David Gale is a tremendous mystery, thriller of a film that is an indictment of capital punishment. This film on the outside looks like just a murder mystery about a man who may or may not be guilty or innocent, but it takes a wonderful and unexpected turn and ends up being a lot more than that. I have been looking forward to his film ever since I saw the previews for it late last year, and was disappointed when it got pushed back to February. I am a huge fan of Kevin Spacey and Kate Winslet, two of my favorite actors and actresses respectively. Kate Winslet plays Bitsey Bloom, a hard nosed take no prisoners attitude reporter for "News" magazine...effectively Newsweek. She has been sent down along with a bright, young intern Zack Stemmons played by Gabriel Mann, to the bible-belt of Huntington, Texas to interview a death row inmate 4 days shy of his execution. That man is David Gale played by Kevin Spacey, a man who has been sentenced to death for the murder of his colleague and friend Constance Harraway played by Laura Linney, who was found raped and murdered in her house six years earlier. Bitsey is to conduct three 2 hour interviews leading up to Gale's execution by lethal injection on the fourth day. She does not really know why she is there or what story will come from this. It is a major story because of who David Gale was and what he stood for. That man was an intellectual and professor of philosophy at Austin Unversity and he was the state's leading death penalty abolishinist along with Constance Harroway they lead an anti-capital punishment organization. The story is intercut between Bitsey's interviews, where we see David Gale's life leading up to the murder and Bitsey and her intern trying to figure out what really happened and why it did...did David Gale kill her? Was he framed or set up? etc. Now with this type of film usually the suspected inmate comes off as a decent guy and you know he didn't do it and eventually the real killer's are found out and brought to justice at the last minute...involving some convoluted conpiracy involving money, revenge etc. I am so glad this film did not take that easy route...it takes a startling and ultimately ver convincing path leading up to a story that is truly about self-sacrfice the ultimate of human experience that Spacey's character Gale talks about in one of his earlier scenes as a professor of philosophy. I won't really say too much than that because it might ruin what is a delicious surprise of a film. I understand that some might feel manipulated by this film and dismiss it as taking a one-sided stand on the subject of the death penalty. Let me say right now that I am for the death penalty, but that doesn't distract from what I think is a very good film condemning the death penalty. Politics is not an issue here for me. The system obviously has flaws(one being you have to wait 9 years on death row, which I find absurd) and this film proves they can be exploited. Overall, The Life of David Gale is not exploitative or manipulative...it doesn't pull a fast one on the audience. Howeer, it is a film about three people who exploit and manipulate capital punishment to brilliant affect. A story about self-sacrifice for what you believe in and featuring an excellent cast which includes Kevin Spacey, Kate Winslet and Laura Linney. Just a superb gem of a film.
  • I don't write reviews, but the recent news of Mr. Spacey motivated me to tell you this movie is just amazing. (I watched it long ago).

    The acting is great and the twisted story is really a masterpiece. It will shock you until the last very minute.

    The plot is wonderful, about death penalty. I won't say more.

    If you consider the news, it is very ironic.

    If you haven't watched it yet, please put it on the top of your watchlist.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    But Kate Winslet packs a punch nevertheless as the witty reporter Bitsey Bloom whom she appears to have channeled out of Julia Roberts college for the naturally gifted! Winslet had to adopt a Newyork American accent and she got it so right that legend has it that she even played pranks on the director and casting by pretending to be a rude agent representing herself in a series of riveting phone calls to the set. David Gale (Kevin Spacey) is a man who falls from grace after having one of those silly one night stand type things that men and their penises have at any given moment in life. He has sex with one of his students at university and she implicates him after the school suspends her for falling grades. Gale's wife and child desert him after this and he is himself thrown out of the college where he had been such a celebrated and respected professor. The plot thickens when a former co-worker and co-activist (played by Laura Linney) winds up dead and once more Gale (the last person seen with her) winds up as a suspect and is implicated. He ends up on death row and Bitsey Bloom (Winslet) is the lucky reporter who gets the one and only interview with him before he is executed. Bitsey flies in from NY is sets up camp but halfway through her interviews with Gale, she finds herself playing detective/reporter/potential victim in a series of plot twists. Who set Gale up? Can she get to the bottom of it before the execution deadline? Is there a conspiracy theory? What will happen to Bitsey? These are all things you will have to find out when you enter the almost perfect LIFE OF David GALE.
  • kosmasp4 March 2021
    VHS - is that something you have heard of? Or even dare I say used? The younger you are the more likely it is, you don't know what I'm talking about. I wouldn't say this has aged badly, but I can see how some would feel that way. And it is not just the VHS thing, but also the absence of cell phones (with cameras).

    But does that really matter? If you nitpick and choose to be bothered by those things, than you have missed the point of the movie. Because this is about the Death Penalty and if it is something that should still exist. The movie has a clear view on this and really hammers that message into the viewer! It also has some interesting twists and a lot of great performances. I had seen this back when it was released but thought it was up for a rewatch. And while I know it is difficult for some to watch anything with Kevin Spacey nowadays, try to free your mind from any negative thoughts and come along for the ride.
  • Well, the problem is not with the cast, since "American Beauty's" Kevin Spacey's is almost flawless; the flaw on the contrary lies in the script, rather than in his or Kate Winslet's performances. Tiatanic's stars does what she can and she has to (in spite of a cliché part) but it's hard to see how anyone could have salvaged the part. Surprises are not lacking but the film's ending/solution is a little dishonest. Due to the gimmick (and unlike the great "Dead Man Walking, this is a movie that death penalty opponents are unlikely to embrace). In fact the point of the flick appears to be that the debate can't be won on logic or morality and so what is requested is just shock but it's a point uneasy to keep. "The Life of David Gale" is well acted as said (Laura Linney is good too) but ends up failing in the most fundamental way because it's a bad drama and worse politics.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Here's a movie that starts out OK. Unfortunately as it goes on, I started to feel less and less interested in the film, which is often the case these days. Spacey is undoubtedly a better supporting actor than lead. He's a pretty good actor, but throughout the movie, he's bland, low-key - probably more a poor choice of direction. Kate Winslet is watchable, but more a Nancy Drew than reporter......implausibilities? plenty - how about the bank issuing $500k cash on the same day and then various characters parading it around everywhere even to other countries, or college professor/administrators drinking and partying publicly with their classes? Car breakdowns, Flat characters, ....

    Its a movie where the FF button gets used more and more - the movie is terribly predictable and the music and acting feel manufactured especially as the movie goes on....one scene in particular with Spacey sort of tearing and sobbing stamped express for the audience. little empathy generated to the point where the ending has little effect. The supporting cast do a better job than the leads. There are worse movies out there, but this is one to check out at your local library if possible. Fails as a "thriller" and cant stand-up as a "drama". 4 out of 10.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    let me start off by saying this movie is a great thriller with good acting and direction, complete with many twists.

    SPOILERS, ONLY READ IF YOU'VE SEEN IT

    however, it seems they took it one twist too far.

    the last five minutes of the ending seem to make the entire movie pointless. if david gale was in on the entire plot, and dusty was actually a good guy, that raises a lot of questions about what this movie stands for.

    first of all, if dusty was intending to release the video containing what "actually" happened, does bitsy even matter? her last interview, and all her efforts to save david, or at least find a way to prove his innocence, are all meaningless, if in the end, he would be vindicated anyway. what is she doing in the movie then? she doesn't matter.

    but the main thing i have a problem with is how this suprise ending takes away from the political stance this movie appears to be making. i thought this movie about an innocent man being killed unjustly by the dealth penalty. i thought this movie was serving as proof that an innocent man could be convicted and executed, and therefore, the policy shouldn't exist.

    but, it turns out that david gale is not completely innocent. sure, there was no actual murder. but the whole thing was a just a set up, that he apparantly masterminded. so what is this movie trying to tell us? i know it's supposed to be happy that david chose this fate for himself. so we don't have to feel so bad about it. but it annoys me that the point of the movie is: david wanted to be the martyr, and became one.

    i thought this movie was supposed to be about seeking the truth. but in the end, the truth is withheld from the public--that david and constance really killed themselves for a cause, as a means to take political action.

    i want to sympathize with david, believe me i do. i want to sympathize with his cause--i'm very against the death penalty. but the execution of a man who willingly, even forcefully, took measures to bring it upon himself--that makes it seem like a waste of a movie.

    if a man doesn't want to be saved, and isn't, am i supposed to feel bad about that? is that supposed to change peoples minds about the death penalty?
An error has occured. Please try again.