Scent of Danger (2002)

I'm referring to «This movie is an insult to real handlers and their dogs., 22 October 2002 -- Author: TC-4 (markviilin@aol.com)» I might candidly agree to all the «technical» arguments regarding dogs training. To a layman like me, they seem founded. But aren't they a bit too «limited», precisely by the dog training experience ? I mean, isn't that movie judged ONLY through that prism ? I would have wanted a personal opinion about the other aspects of that movie. There must be some... even if it's by no means the «greatest movie for TV ever made»! Personally, I found it «original» BECAUSE of the roles played by the dogs. Also, who but other «dog experts» could or would agree with the flaws denounced -- however accurate they are...? And I would tend to think that they really ARE! As a layman, of course. Cheers!