User Reviews (156)

Add a Review

  • Here is a beautifully-filmed documentary on the migration of birds. This movie took four years to make, and one can see why. You cannot get much closer, I would think, to the flying birds than what you see here. Cameras were literally attached to some of the birds so you, the viewer, are up there in the sky right with these (mainly) geese as they migrant thousands of miles.

    The colors are beautiful and the sound is good. However, be warned there is no dialog so it can be tough viewing the whole 90 minutes in one sitting. Also, I found the best and most interesting footage at the beginning.

    Nevertheless, this is a good addition to anyone's collection if or no other reason than the magnificent photography and the effort filmmakers put out to make this wildlife documentary. It also is interesting how they show different species every few minutes, where they go each year, how many miles they travel, the exact route, etc. Wildlife and bird-lovers in particular, should love this film.
  • It probably took a lot of time and effort to put this together. I wasn't bored for a minute. Some people get the big picture some people don't. I thought it was a rare treat to see things like this for a moment. To get outside of oneself and experience life in different terms made me feel good. It was peaceful and entertaining. I enjoyed the naration somewhat but felt it detracted from the film because it took away from the esoteric nature of the film as did the unnatural injection of unnatural elements. This untouched bit of nature needed very little narration. I admire anyone who is so dedicated to a project that they can truly expose nature in plain air. Winged migration was a great bit of craftsmanship.
  • ucbengel31 March 2004
    I was quite pleased with this movie until I watched the "behind the scenes" featurette on the DVD. It turns out that most of the extraordinary close-ups of winged flight that make the movie memorable are NOT of wild migrating birds. Rather, the filmakers raised and domesticated all sorts of birds through a process known as "imprinting" so they would be comfortable flying next to the noisy photography planes. Then they took their birds all over the world to dramatic backdrops like the Sahara and Monument Vally. They also used these domesticated birds for the dramatic set pieces revolving around birds trapped in sludge, stuck in a blizzard, escaping cages, or wandering the desert. Not only are these set pieces heavy-handed and overly dramatic, but the fact that the birds are not even wild and were placed in these situations really undermines the credibility of the film.

    7 out of 10 (minus 1 point for the use of domesticated birds and minus 2 for putting ridiculously staged drama scenes in an otherwise beautiful nature film)
  • When documentaries fail to show humans and human events it's almost enough to put the audience to sleep by default (except of course, those who get excited at the mere suggestion of shows like "Nova" or educational programmes sponsored by the Mutual of Omaha).

    WINGED MIGRATION doesn't essentially need or looks to inform us what we probably know already: that birds migrate, and in doing so, ensure their own species. But what it does show us is a continuous yet striking montage of birds of different species flying among oceans, mountains, skies, land... we see them through their points of view, while throughout there is the barest suggestion of a plot here and there as inevitably one bird either gets lost in flight, lands in a ship, gets caught in toxic waste (of which it may not escape alive as the others, obeying that instinctual law of moving on, depart), gets disoriented and injured and becomes food for hungry crabs, or even captured by humans to become pets. Beautiful, sometimes moving images that shows us a quiet cycle of life, death, and reproduction, which will stay with the viewer long after the credits have rolled.
  • Watching Jacques Perrin's Winged Migration I felt incredibly cheated. I felt cheated out of the fact that I didn't get the chance to see this remarkable film at my locale theatre where the images would be displayed in a much larger venue.

    Winged Migration is an astonishing achievement. With the help of 450 individuals, including 17 pilots and 14 cinematographers, directors Jacques Perrin, Michael Debats and Jacques Cluzaud, bring to life the migrating habits of a variety of birds throughout the world.

    We learn of the red-crowned crane that flies 600 miles from the far east to the Siberian taiga, the sandhill crane that flies 2000 miles from the Central American Plains to the Arctic circle, and the bald eagle that flies 1800 miles from the American West to Alaska, just to name a few. But it is how we learn from these creatures that is pure cinematic symphony. The three directors took 4 years to film Winged Migration and used everything from gliders, planes, helicopters and balloons to get close enough to the flying birds that you would actually think you are one of them. The scene of the Canadian Geese migrating is photographed so magnificently through the Grand Canyon that we can see the reflection of the formation on the stilled morning waters without the simplest distraction of man.

    Winged Migration is filled with such imagery. Not soon will I forget the greater sage grouse in Idaho where the birds have expanding chests and have tail-feathers that look as sharp as a porcupine's quills. Nor will I soon forget the scenes where millions of king penguins take over a coastal island or the countless birds diving into the water with such rapid fire like a multiple torpedo hit.

    What is really amazing however, is how the filmmakers were able to show the birds in such a format as to give them personalities. We see the arrogance of the Canadian Goose, the fighting nature of the red breasted goose, the relentless tenacity of the captured Amazon parrot and the grieving king penguins after one of their young are eaten.

    For all its glorious visuals, it is man that brings to the screen the most unnatural and catastrophic of images. Threshers on a farm destroy a habitat, hunters hide in the reeds and shoot down overhead geese and pollution and sludge take the life of a migrating red breast. It is hard to believe that the same species that could get close enough to these birds to follow them hundreds of miles, is also one of their greatest enemies.

    Winged Migration should be seen on the large screen, but even on the tiniest of home entertainment units, you cannot help but marvel at the life cycle, the fight for survival and incredible long journey's these creatures embark upon twice a year. Three stars.
  • tigerave2 February 2004
    I really cannot summarize this documentary in one word. I was awe-struck, elated, saddened...this movie has so many emotional experiences in one 90-minute time frame that I am completely overwhelmed by it. The cinematography is so outstanding it is nearly unbelievable. That same cinematography is behind much of the emotional upheaval of this documentary. Some of the vistas and scenery are so breathtaking that you might just find yourself crying from the joy of looking at something so beautiful.

    The musical score for this movie is half the experience. I don't think the movie would have been the same at all without it. The movie speaks to your heart, but the music speaks to your soul. The birds themselves are stunning and you feel their complete freedom, as well as the effort it takes to fly these tremendous distances, all based on the instinct of survival. Not all survive, and you will feel the sadness and pain of the sacrifices made along the arduous trip.

    I happen to be a bird lover, but I don't think you need to be one to fully appreciate this movie. It is so much more than just about birds, it's the life, struggle and survival of all wild creatures who follow their instincts. If you see this movie, and I think everyone should, you will come away from it with a greater feel and respect for nature and it's struggles, as well as it's magnificent beauty. And I, for one, believe that respect will make each of us a better person.

    I give this movie a 10.
  • A film that's difficult to classify: part nature film, part documentary, part drama. And *completely* beautiful. The makers of this film used every imaginable flying and suspending machine in order to film birds wherever they went. From ultra-light planes to hot air balloons, to hang gliders the camera operators managed to capture what must be the most amazing shots of flying ever filmed. The crew travelled the world to follow birds in migration (and some in their native habitat).

    My kids (ages 11 to 15) were transfixed.

    To those who say this film lacks "action", I can only express my deep regret that they are so earth-bound as to be unable to let go and soar with some of nature's most wonderful creatures.
  • Each shot of this pheonominal documentary has been painstakingly worked on for over four years and it shows in one of the most beautiful and moving cinematic experiences I've ever witnessed. This is a documentary that celebrates and illustrates the beauty in life through a new set of eyes that we've never used before. For those of us who can't be globe trotters, for those of us who admire the tremendous live show that nature puts on for us every day, and for those of us who have always dreamed of flying, this is the movie to sit back and take in this wonderful experience. Some of the images are so beautiful to witness, they may move you to tears out of sheer beauty. How many scripted movies can do that?

    This should have won Best Documentary.
  • gromit-1710 December 2003
    I enjoy watching documentaries on subject of nature but felt disappointed about this movie. Especially after watching the `making of..' on DVD. I felt cheated, because most of film was heavily manipulated (images, sound, even the touchy little plots here and there) and staged that it really should not be in the documentary category (it was nominated for Oscar). Those birds are so well trained and they were not really migrating, they were just following the crews who raised them.

    I have to admit that it is beautifully and uniquely filmed with the magnificent beauty of birds (mostly waterfowl only, because they are easy to raise and train) and the perfectly staged scenic backdrops. But almost all the people I have asked (and some of them are avid bird watchers) admitted that they lost interest about the movie halfway through for the very same reason – repetitive! It's nice to look at, but easy to get tired of after a while because lack of substance.

    Maybe the heavy manipulation of this project is the only way we, as human, will ever be able to experience what it must has been like from a bird's point of view. But still, I felt uneasy about making a ‘documentary' this way to manipulate viewer's perspective from reality to such an extend. If they noted that nothing was computer enhanced or trick photography at the beginning of the film, why didn't they mention the facts of the trained birds and staged stories? If it were not DVD and the ‘documentary' on making of this ‘documentary', I would not know I was watching more a drama than a documentary film. That is disturbing.
  • This magnificent documentary was a delight. It is a rare film to enjoy as it shows how these amazing creatures migrate from place to place in such incredible fashion.

    The colors and the backgrounds behind the different species are photographed with such an eye to detail that one wonders the miracle of the technology behind it. One thing that never ceased to surprise me was the way most birds are shown flying in perfect formation as the camera seems to be part of the flock and it's just going along for the ride.

    Contrary to what other people have experienced in watching this film, time practically "flew" for me as it was never boring, even though we are constantly looking at birds that are somehow similar doing the same thing over and over.

    It's surprising that this documentary has been shown in art houses to grown ups, mainly. It is a film that would be suitable for children instead of other kinds of violent cartoons, or films that emphasize the brutal force in humans.

    I'll take the birds, anytime!
  • tbaybars16 December 2001
    This film has been awaited all over France for quite a while. It is extremely well done and there are some splendid shots of migrating birds from well-known locations in France to less-known places far away. What I find missing in this beautiful documentary is a cohesive narrative. There are unexpected jumps from one shot to another, captions are neither here nor there, and they are so minute that you need binoculars to read them! It is a great shame that such a rich source of material, exquisite photography, was not properly edited and commented on.
  • Although much of this film features birds in the wild, most (but not all) of the incredible in-flight photography starred a variety of imprinted birds. These geese, swan and pelicans, raised from birth by the filmmakers, were transported to migratory routes and habitats around the globe to "perform" as if they were actors. Indeed they were!

    Some have criticized this approach as somehow undermining the film's credibility. But notwithstanding the film's official classification, Perrin himself doesn't consider his masterpiece as a documentary, but rather an homage to these beautiful creatures. The end result speaks for itself. Winged Migration was simply the most awe-inspiring piece of cinematography I have ever witnessed.

    OK, I admit it... to me there's something magical about bonding and flying with large birds, as has been previously depicted in Fly Away Home and The Life of Birds (Part 10). I don't know enough about the arguments against imprinting to defend the practice. But I suspect neither do its critics have specific knowledge of how these birds fared in life. They looked pretty happy to me.

    The production itself, documented in the nearly one-hour 'making of' featurette, was a monumental achievement against any yardstick. Perrin and his five crews shot more than 400 kilometers of film (240 hours) on location in forty countries and all seven continents. His team endured the hardships of nature (Hurricane Floyd, blizzards, heat, etc.) and the dangers of flying machines (seven crashes). In order to capture those incredible in-flight sequences, the filmmakers used just about every moving platform one can imagine... from trucks to remote-controlled ATV's, from speedboats to a Navy battleship, from ultralights to powered parachutes, and from gliders to hot-air balloons. Whatever it took.

    And finally, Bruno Coulais' moving orchestral score provided the perfect emotional pitch for the cinematography without being overly manipulative. Folks who enjoy new-age genre (think Enya meets Chris Franke) will want to own the soundtrack. It can easily stand on its own.

    Le Peuple Migrateur is a rare movie. And for me, a spiritual experience.
  • E-Z-Rider3 January 2004
    Yes, there are some amazing shots of flying birds, but it goes on and on and on showing different birds doing basically the same thing--flying, roosting, landing, flying some more, eating, flying--there's a lot of flying. The narrative is terse and uninformative. You are given no idea WHY these birds are migrating, and sometimes you can't even tell WHERE they're going (like where is the "Boreal forest"?) You are told very little about their way of life, other than the fact that they do a lot of flying. The sequences skip around geographically and by species, with no apparent connection. And it goes on and on and on and on and on ... . If you have insomnia, the DVD is a very good investment.
  • jamesowen-229 January 2006
    'Winged Migration' is beautiful, immense and ultimately... disappointing.

    As a British viewer I may have been previously spoilt by the work of the BBC's Natural History Unit which uses similarly mesmirising visuals to far better affect because we learn something about the subjects. The minimal narration of this film teaches us nothing of the birds, so after the first half hour of soaring geese and gannets diving to the harmonic tones celtic/Gothic choirs, it began to get rather boring, and I say this a bird enthusiast. The stunning visuals might take your breath away and make you marvel at the truly amazing journeys the birds annually undertake, but how much more impressive the birds might have seemed if there was a narration informing of the distances involved, or that birds perhaps born only eight weeks earlier manage to complete them.

    If on the other hand you want to switch your brain off, and relax to pretty pictures for an hour and a half, this is your movie. It's like muzak. It's an alternative to taking a herbal bath.

    So far as parents are concerned, unless you're personally capable of providing your children with information about the birds, they'll get just as bored as I did.

    Finally the staged scenes, primarily the frequent use of imprinted birds, which might not be obvious to most viewers, raises questions about how far wildlife documentary filmmakers should go in their portrayal of the truth. If you initially understand that the flight sequences are being filmed from a microlight the birds have been specially bred and trained to follow, it gets rather annoying after the first couple of scenes to see yet another wild species coerced that way by the filmmakers.

    The truth in this film, much like the birds, is manipulated to produce a superficial and oblivious illustration of what are remarkable creatures.

    Try David Attenborough's, The Life of Birds, instead. All the beauty and explanations too.
  • brower825 November 2003
    Birds don't get the respect that they deserve. Maybe they just don't inculcate the fear that some mammals, reptiles, and sharks inspire. They are hard to cuddle up to, and only one of them (the cassowary) legitimately inspires fear in Man.

    The world of birds is nature red in beak and talon instead of tooth and claw, but you have to hand it to them: they are beautiful, and with the arguable exceptions of some sea creatures and (only recently) us, they have the longest, swiftest, and most heroic migrations. It's all for survival: getting food where it is available for only part of the year and escaping predators that find chicks easy prey. Birds don't have it easy; Darwinian natural selection treats exhausted, ill, or injured birds with supreme harshness. Add to that the perils that Man has imposed upon them: the firearm and trained dog (cats aren't shown; we know them all too well), poaching for the wildlife trade, and environmental pitfalls. You want to do anything to keep the geese from flying into a Soviet-era industrial complex that reminds one of a portal to Hell, a place unfit for humans but especially hazardous to birds.

    You will feel tragedy for the wader bird with a broken wing that faces an army of hungry crabs and cheer for a macaw that tries to open its own cage to escape the pet trade. Although a documentary, this film shows harsh drama and heroism, the latter without resorting to Disney-esquire anthropomorphism.

    The flight sequences are magnificent -- so good that they look almost unreal. Maybe it's the unusual camera angles, such as seeing birds from the sides in a more genuine "bird's eye view". If there is a lot of bird flight, (1) it's a lot of different birds, and (2) what do you expect of migratory birds? For a more encyclopedic treatment of bird behavior on film, then turn to Attenborough's "Secret Life of Birds".

    The only special effects, that of imposing migrant birds over a globe, are ludicrous. Mercifully one sees little of that, and it has its purpose: to establish the incredible distances that some birds fly. Special effects are not necessary: we see some flights through some spectacular vistas -- at boat level in Paris and at the level of bird flight in New York City, the Great Wall of China, Mount Kilomanjaro, the Grand Canyon and Monument Valley.

    Some of the urban flight scenes could never be made again; the World Trade Center buildings, destroyed by the most perverse sort of flying imaginable, created a backdrop that could never be seen again. Governments may make urban flights such as that through New York with the birds impossible. We just might never get to see scenes in a sequel in which migratory birds fly through San Francisco, Rio de Janeiro, Rome, Beijing, St. Petersburg (Russia), or past the Hagia Sophia, the Pyramids, or the Taj Mahal.
  • Forget `Ode to a Skylark.' `Winged Migration' - adhering to the proposition that a picture is indeed worth a thousand words - offers a soaring, visually astonishing tribute to all the cranes, geese, swans and assorted other birds that have, since time immemorial, made long and dangerous airborne treks from one corner of the globe to another. Like no nature special you've ever seen, directors Jacques Cluzaud, Michel Debats and Jacques Perrin and no fewer than fifteen credited cinematographers create a visual poem to these feathered marvels by taking us right into the thick of the action, somehow managing to get their cameras to fly, in beautifully coordinated fashion, right alongside the birds at amazing speeds and altitudes. Seeing is believing in the case of this film, and even after seeing it, you still may not believe it. That's how eye-popping and visually dazzling an experience this film is.

    With only minimal narration (some of it spoken and some of it subtitled), the filmmakers provide some helpful information regarding the particular species we are seeing and its migratory patterns. But the film is far more of an aesthetic visual experience than an educational one. For long stretches of the movie, the birds merely fly along in majestic silence or backed up by haunting symphonic mood music (much of it reminiscent of the work in `Koyaanisqatsi').

    In addition to the birds themselves and their amazing feats, the cinematography captures, with blindingly crystal clarity, the awesome beauty of the various landscapes through which these extraordinary creatures travel (there's even a shot of the birds flying past the Twin Towers). Watching this film is truly like being transported to another world. Nature has probably never looked this good on film.
  • When I was a kid in the 1970's, before VCR's were commonly available, we would watch nature documentaries in school that were typically made by Walt Disney studios back in the '40's & '50's. They would be fairly boring stock footage of wild animals in their natural habitat, narrated in such a way that each creature was given distinctly human characteristics and even names ("Ringo the Raccoon" stands out in my memory). Later on in the 1980's, my mother wanted the family to watch "NOVA" & David Attenborough's "Life on Earth" on PBS, and I was introduced to a different kind of nature documentary: minimal narration matched with stunning visuals that let the animals be animals. In the 1990's of course came the Discovery Channel and Animal Planet, but compared to even the Disney films, they were dull and uneventful because these were usually videotaped rather than filmed footage, concentrating on mating or violence and little else. And watching it, I missed the Attenborough series and what NOVA used to be before it became more of a news magazine than a nature show.

    That is until now. "Winged Migration" hearkens back to the glory days of the nature documentary. Everything is filmed instead of taped, and the concentration is on migration, not mating or violence. We don't have some insane zoo-keeper jumping up and down in front of the camera yelling "Crikey!" In fact, there is only a little narration that happens maybe once every 10 minutes. And unlike the rest of Animal Planet, you can see it with even the smallest or most sensitive children without worrying. Instead of sex and gore, we have an almost meditative look at how birds behave in a flock and what flight truly entails.

    Also, this is the first movie that literally can say it takes a bird's-eye view of anything. This is achieved by getting the cameras to move along with the birds with the earth passing underneath, rather than just having an earth-bound camera pointing to the sky. This gives the viewer a new appreciation for how birds fly, and a sense of amazement at how lower life forms are able to do such a complex thing. I was also stunned at how truly graceful these creatures are, even as they plunge to their deaths from hunters' bullets, and how effortlessly they land on the ground as opposed to a jet or space shuttle.

    Although the American bald eagle and the prairie grouse make cameos, the film mostly concentrates on waterfowl. I was particularly fascinated with the ballerina-like Russian red-crowned crane, and the unusual water antics of the Oregon grebe.

    The film does have its flaws, though. The score is mostly awful French music, with Nick Cave doing a few songs that sound exactly like the awful French music. And there are moments that were clearly staged. Also, I find it dishonest of the filmmakers to put that disclaimer at the beginning that no special effects were used, and then in the closing credits, have about 58 people credited for the special digital visual effects.

    But overall, this is an incredibly well-made film that will enthrall all nature-lovers who see it. 9 out of 10.
  • My only negative comment would be was that I would love to see this on an Imax screen to get the full widescreen effect. I saw it on a regular movie screen and while still powerful, something was missing. A long list of credits rolled when it was over, this was an incredible feat of filming and the birds in their travel of thousands of miles are awe-inspiring. This is an extremely slow-paced documentary, however, and not suitable for children. The downside was the shooting of some of these birds when flying over the U.S. having been in the air for thousands of miles, a wrenching few minutes. The commentary was minimal, which was perfect, and I loved the music. The eight year old with me was very bored, nothing much happens for a child's entertainment. She gave it a 5 out of 10 and I gave it an 8.
  • A fine french documentary about migratory birds, by the same team that made the insect documentary "Microcosmos". You are likely to be awed by these images, and wonder "how did they film this" all the time. Unfortunately, I also had a few reservations: one (a minor, perhaps) is that the documentary is a bit too long, even for the most enthusiasts of bird lovers. Second, the version I saw in the cinema was dubbed in a very strongly accented English, which was distractive. Third (and perhaps more seriously), some of the sequences are obviously staged (for example, a parrot escaping from a cage in the Amazon): for a movie that purports to be a documentary, seeing something to be staged is an obvious disappointment. These criticisms aside, I believe this movie is very much worthwhile watching.
  • trvpup15 March 2005
    Warning: Spoilers
    Even if you are not a bird watcher, the magnificent film footage will take your breath away. Using motorized gliders, you will view the world as the birds do and fly with them as they migrate south for the winter. The cameras take you through all four seasons with various kinds of birds as they follow their instincts through all kinds of tough weather and situations. Although the film could've been used for social commentary, I think you will find that the filmmakers' choice to provide the viewer with an objective bird's eye view was both appropriate and tasteful. All you need to do is sit back, enjoy and imagine that you are 'just one of the birds'! The stunning views of the landscape alone make this a must-see film. I highly recommend the "making of" extended DVD version to get a first-hand look at the special relationship that developed between the crew and the birds.
  • The cinematography is impressive, but the music is tortuous after a while. It is like listening to 2 Enya CDs back-to-back. And when the birds are flying with the globe in the background, you wonder well if this is fake, what else is fake. Could have been much better without being so schmaltzy.
  • I was impressed not only with the amazing camera work, but also the well-implemented scheme of going through seasons and continents, spring to spring, south to north. And whether you like birds or not (and I am indifferent), these migrations are impressive. The longest is the Arctic stork (? gull?): 21,000 miles from north to south arctic. By the time they showed that fact, I was feeling amazed at the whole production.

    This film is not for everybody. No plot, repetitive (albeit enjoyable) score, no SFX or action-demolition shots. But the scenery, the sense of flying, the gorgeous shots of avalanches and Canadian forestland in the autumn... It's only 90 minutes, but what a beautiful time!
  • A bunch of this footage is "amazing" - I would have preferred if the filmmakers had stuck to the true to nature stuff and not taken the "cast" to the Statue of Liberty, Paris, etc.

    This is an amazing "story" of the journeys, hazards and adventures of some beautiful creatures. There are a few quite shocking moments - but they are explainable to young viewers.

    What kind of "documentary" edits shots to make them more interesting? For me, this is the film's major flaw and is downright unconscionable. Cut out 20 minutes or so of this tomfoolery and fakery and this would be a "10" – easy!
  • I saw "Winged Migration" at a screening where a orinthologist from the Museum of Natural History in New York City spoke about the methods that were probably used to make this film. Without giving anything away, let me say that alot of the footage was not natural and was "set-up" by the director. After hearing his comments a lively discussion ensued between those audience members that felt "had" and those that enjoyed the film for its sheer beauty. I sided with the first group and felt like I was taken in. I felt like I had been watching a bird "Docudrama"! I was frankly surprised by the positive reviews for the film. Evidently none of the critics knew or cared about being tricked. And there is really nothing to be learned about birds from this film If you want to see fantastic, real footage of birds, watch the David Attenborough series on birds. It's far superior to "Winged Migration".
An error has occured. Please try again.