Wallace & Gromit: The Curse of the Were-Rabbit (2005)

G   |    |  Animation, Adventure, Comedy


Wallace & Gromit: The Curse of the Were-Rabbit (2005) Poster

Wallace and his loyal dog, Gromit, set out to discover the mystery behind the garden sabotage that plagues their village and threatens the annual giant vegetable growing contest.


7.4/10
126,801


Videos


Photos

  • Wallace & Gromit: The Curse of the Were-Rabbit (2005)
  • Ian Whitlock in Wallace & Gromit: The Curse of the Were-Rabbit (2005)
  • Wallace & Gromit: The Curse of the Were-Rabbit (2005)
  • Wallace & Gromit: The Curse of the Were-Rabbit (2005)
  • Peter Sallis at an event for Wallace & Gromit: The Curse of the Were-Rabbit (2005)
  • Wallace & Gromit: The Curse of the Were-Rabbit (2005)

See all photos

Get More From IMDb

For an enhanced browsing experience, get the IMDb app on your smartphone or tablet.

Get the IMDb app

Reviews & Commentary

Add a Review


User Reviews


10 September 2005 | Mollari
9
| A really Grand Day Out – and A Close Ten!
I saw it at a German press screening. Without giving too much away: Most critics really seemed to like it very much. There was even applause afterwards, which is quite unusual for that species. From my point of view and until now, it was the funniest movie of the year. It keeps the charm and wit of the three W+G shorts and it is enlarged with many references to these and other movies. Of course, there are obvious allusions to monster- and werewolf-movies, especially to "An American Werewolf in London", "Jaws", "King Kong" and even to Peter Jackson's "Braindead"/"Dead Alive", but also to other genres.

Characterization was better done in "Chicken Run", but that movie had a complete new "cast" where introduction was necessary. Here, you are already able to know the two main characters. So, the new "Wallace and Gromit"-movie is enjoyed best if you watched (and liked) the shorts already, yet it also works on its own. "Chicken Run" had the more convenient, but also more "storytelling" plot. Instead, this new Aardman masterpiece keeps that crazier and somehow more "isolated" feeling of the W+G shorts. Children should also enjoy it very much, especially because of the sweet rabbits (if you love cute bunnies, this is a must-see for you!!!) and because Gromit has a lot do to and really steals the show (children also love dogs... :-) ). But many jokes are thought for a more adult audience (there are even soft sexual allusions in it). The movie manages, like "Shrek 1+2" and "The Incredibles", to fulfil high level entertainment for the whole family, with adding a British and at least a little bit darker edge to the humour of American animated movies.

The animation is – as expected – superb, and they kept true to the Aardman style because they didn't put in too many digital effects - I realized just a few when it came to Wallace's inventions.

Finally, the score works fine in the movie, although one of the main themes definitely is "borrowed" by Randy Edelman's "Dragonheart" score.

The bad thing is: It will probably take another six years from now until we can see a new animated gem from Nick Park & Co.

Metacritic Reviews


Critic Reviews



Details

Release Date:

7 October 2005

Language

English


Country of Origin

UK, USA, France, Ireland

Filming Locations

Bristol, England, UK

Box Office

Budget:

$30,000,000 (estimated)

Opening Weekend USA:

$16,025,987 9 October 2005

Gross USA:

$56,110,897

Cumulative Worldwide Gross:

$194,137,091

Contribute to this page

Reboots & Remakes We Can't Wait to See

From "Dexter" to The Suicide Squad, here are our picks for the reboots and remakes we're most excited for in 2021 and beyond.

Browse our picks

Great Films the 2021 Oscars Missed for Best Picture

The Academy inevitably missed a few gems for 2021 Best Picture nominees. Here are some great movies worth streaming that you won't see at the Oscars this year.

Watch the video

Around The Web

 | 

Powered by Taboola

More To Explore

Search on Amazon.com