Calendar Girls (2003)

PG-13   |    |  Comedy, Drama


Calendar Girls (2003) Poster

A Women's Institute chapter's fundraising effort for a local hospital by posing nude for a calendar becomes a media sensation.


6.9/10
22,999


Videos


Photos

  • Helen Mirren and Julie Walters in Calendar Girls (2003)
  • Chris (Mirren, right) and her husband, Rod (Ciaran Hinds, left) celebrate the success of the calendar
  • Helen Mirren and Julie Walters in Calendar Girls (2003)
  • (Left) Annie (Walters, left) and husband, John (John Alderton, right)
  • Julie Walters (right) poses with Angela Baker (left).
  • Legendary actresses Helen Mirren (center left) and Julie Walters (center right) pose with the inspirations for their characters: two of the original "calendar girls," Tricia Stewart (left) and Angela Baker (right).

See all photos

Get More From IMDb

For an enhanced browsing experience, get the IMDb app on your smartphone or tablet.

Get the IMDb app

Reviews & Commentary

Add a Review


User Reviews


27 February 2004 | keenan-1
10
| Go see it!
I've been getting a little tired of the computer-enhanced extravaganzas that have been flung at viewers over the past few years. You know what I'm talking about--the movies that are short on plot, acting or both which are bolstered up by loud FX and revolutionary digital animation so that it becomes "special effects in search of a picture". I'm delighted to say that CALENDAR GIRLS has nothing of the kind. It's all about the plot, all about the women involved, and all about laughing so hard you cry--or maybe about being able to forget tears in deep laughter, if only for a moment.

The acting is superb. One hardly needs to mention Helen Mirren. I read one comment that pans her Yorkshire accent; well, I attended it with an Englishwoman who is very familiar with such an accent and she specifically told me that her accent never slipped, so I've no idea where that comment came from.

Having been involved with the world of cancer treatment recently (fortunately with a happier outcome for my mother, a survivor of breast cancer) this movie strikes close to home. It's completely accurate; it's not pretty and it's often degrading, no matter how much the oncological staff tries to make it easier. The movie is also accurate in the kind of sentiments it expresses about cancer. People who have been touched by that filthy disease will do ANYTHING to fight it. (I sat on a spin bike for twenty-four consecutive hours in aid of breast cancer less than two weeks ago, so I do know what I'm talking about.) Yes, a few liberties with the real story have been taken. So what? The result is a coherent progression that is more interested in human beings than plot details. And isn't that what it should be about?

I've heard this dismissed as a movie for "older people". I'm proud to be of that number--after all, at the age of thirty-five I'm ten years out of the target demographic at which Hollywood films are aimed. If by "older people" they mean people who want a movie to be about something important as opposed to the latest spectacular light show, I'm glad to be of that number. I'd recommend this to anyone who's interested in a movie that is both hysterically funny and deeply touching. It has re-inspired me in the battle against cancer, and if it does that to anyone else, it will have made a worthwhile difference.

Metacritic Reviews


Critic Reviews



Box Office

Budget:

$10,000,000 (estimated)

Opening Weekend USA:

$151,393 21 December 2003

Gross USA:

$31,041,759

Cumulative Worldwide Gross:

$93,400,759

Contribute to this page

The Rise of Will Smith

As Will Smith joins the cast of "The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air" for a reunion on HBO Max, we take a look at his rise to fame.

Watch the video

Around The Web

 | 

Powered by ZergNet

More To Explore

Search on Amazon.com