User Reviews (113)

Add a Review

  • When you go into these fan made shorts it's hard to have any hope that they will deliver. How do you make something like Batman with a non-existent budget?

    Standing at around the eight minute mark this short see's Batman hunting down the Joker on the streets of Gotham. Newly broken out of Arkham Asylum he isn't the only thing that hides in the darkness.

    As hard as it is to believe but this is Batman vs Joker vs Aliens vs Predator and it looks fantastic! The sfx are considerably better than you'd expect and the whole thing is constructed so well I'm genuinely upset there isn't a feature length movie.

    I'd consider this a must watch for Batman fans and would love to see more by these guys.

    The Good:

    Looks amazing

    Great concept

    The Bad:

    Batmans costume looks naff

    Things I Learnt From This Short:

    If fans can make this masterpiece then what's the excuse for Batman vs Superman?
  • It's about time someone tried to do something with Batman, if Warner won't. It combines three movies I think fans would love to see, though because of this it suffers from lack of time. Very cool idea, it leaves a lot up to the imagination as to how it began or how it ends, or what happens to certain other villians. I thought the villians costumes looked amazing, I assume someone broke into the Fox props department for those. This was short, but darker than even Burton's first Batman movie, though this one relies a little heavy on his script, at least at first. The directing was great, too, there were several well composed shots, which says a lot about an 8 minute film. I loved the fact that Bats was in his classic black and grey costume, which was made of cloth and not rubber. If you have the disk space and the time to DL this, you won't be disappointed.
  • Don't expect a crappy little amateur film. "Batman: Dead End" puts some of the superhero movies made these days till shame.

    The style and atmosphere is even darker and more sinister then in the 2 Tim Burton Batman movies. You can say that "Batman: Dead End" is a more daring movie. The movie shows how the makers can handle several styles and it's the crew that really deserves credit. Everything works perfect especially the cinematography.

    But let's not forget the cast. Clark Bartram is actually a very convincing Batman (Better then Val Kilmer and George Clooney anyway) and Andrew Koenig is the perfect Joker his character is actually much more different then from the original movie in a good way. The character is more sinister and psychotic in a scary way instead of an entertaining. The characters are much more closer then the ones from the comic books.

    Sure the story is just beyond silly but that's not the point, the crew really showed how they can handle different moments and styles. This little film is filled with wonderful little moments and is a shear pleasure to watch.

    Awesome fights, great make-up, wonderful costumes, excellent directing, great cast, most excellent cinematography and a great and daring atmosphere and style, what is there not to like?

    8/10

    http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/
  • I had been hearing about his film making the rounds at comic book conventions across the country. It has now been posted on ifilm.com, so I decided to take a peek. And damned if it isn't as good as I've been hearing. It's plain to see that the movie's director, Sandy Collora, is greatly influenced by the artwork of the legendary Alex Ross. This is evident in his use of minimal light, especially at the beginning as he shows Batman (Clark Bartram) putting on his costume. Bartram just might be as close to being perfectly cast as any of the big-screen Batmen. The eight-minute film centers around another escape from Arkham Asylum by the Joker (Andrew Koenig, looking very frightening). Batman catches up with our favorite homicidal maniac in an alley. A brief fight ensues and the two adversaries each give the old "You made me what I am" speech to each other (just like in the first film) before Joker is snatched away. All I'll reveal is that two creatures from a rival studio make appearances, both have appeared in the DC Comics universe before. But it's quite a shock to see them here, especially the first creature to show up. With this minimal budget, Collora (who works primarily as a special effects man) shows that a humongous budget isn't totally necessary to make a captivating film. From this effort, here's hoping that Collora can get more work behind the camera. No matter what the budget.
  • arker16 November 2003
    I just had the opportunity at last to see this amazing short film. It cost me a lot of effort but finally i got a grab at this really good piece of art. Movies should be given to hardcore fans of the comic characters, this guys involved in this short film, did a better job than famous Joel Schumacher and all that money and famous actors in the awful flick they made. This is a great example that the heart of a movie is not a famous director or actor like val kilmer or george clooney, or schwarzenneger, my good this short film is a jewel and far more entertaining than the film directed by joel schumacher, the studios should learn that. This film rocks.
  • Hearing constant kudos and praise for this short fan film, my interest was piqued. Just being a fan film that one of the few that is NOT about Star Wars is enough to recommend it. Seeing Batman take on an alien as well as Predators is fun in an ultra geeky way and for the money spent, it IS quite a nice looking and polished film. On a whole, I did enjoy it. The one thing that didn't work for me in the least was the casting of Boner from "Growing Pains" as the Joker. Listen, the guy has had NO work since that show for a reason. He just can not act and brings the short to a grinding halt almost before it truly begins. But as I said, it's a huge nerdy Geekgasm after the Joker is out of the picture.

    My Grade: B
  • hoeech9 August 2003
    Perhaps Joel Schumacher would be willing to take pointers from Sandy Collora on film direction, but I doubt his ego would permit him to even consider it. This 8 minute masterpiece is how the 3rd and 4th "Batman" films should have looked, and more importantly, FELT, had someone with a sense of what the character was all about were in charge. Unfortunately, we were saddled with Mr. Schumacher who is under the impression that silly comic relief; ridiculous gadgets and unnecessary explosions make for a good film. It is my sincerest hope that the powers that be in Hollywood take notice of this little gem and allow Sandy Collora a chance to direct the 5th Batman film before it too is ruined before it even hits the screens.
  • 'Batman: Dead End' is a short film made by Sandy Collora on a small budget and considering that he has done a nice job. We see Batman (Clark Bartram) putting on his suit, as a Batman-film should begin, before going after The Joker (Andrew Koenig), escaped from Arkham Asylum once again. They fight, have some dialogue together, and then you should stop reading if you do not want to know who will enter this short film next.

    The Joker gets destroyed by Predator, the alien character from the Arnold Schwarzenegger film with the same name ('Predator', not 'Schwarzenegger') before Batman is attacked by an Alien, known from the 'Alien'-series starring Sigourney Weaver. How it all ends up exactly you should see for yourself in this dark but nicely made short film which almost could be considered as a little preview for the 2004 film 'Alien vs. Predator'. On entertaining values I would choose to see 'Batman: Dead End' and leave it at that.
  • This is apparently a short piece of fan fiction--not a piece authorized or made by DC Comics. Despite this and a budget of $30,000 (a huge amount for a fan film--a tiny drop in the hat for a professional-looking film), it is very professional in style and is quite watchable to those who are not fans of the caped crusader (I sure am not a big fan, but I liked it).

    The film begins with Batman having a showdown with The Joker--who is very, very well portrayed by Andrew Koenig. He is nothing like the Jack Nicholson version--more like a demonic comic book version. However, one this crook is dispatched, some MAJOR surprises are in store for Batman--ones that I don't want to divulge as it would spoil the suspense.

    The bottom line is this is a terrific film--well worth a peek and only taking about six minutes out of your otherwise hectic lives.
  • This movie is so great. The dialogue between Batman and The Joker kicks ass. It reminds me of Jeph Loeb and Frank Miller's work. Stunning. The fight is pretty cool, you know, Bats is strong and he just need one punch at the time. Arnold-style, not Bruce Lee type of thing. KICKS ASS. The twist in the middle is a fun thing, but it would be a better movie if it stick to the Comic Book Way.

    SPOLIER: In the middle of the movie, suddenly The Joker gets grabbed by Ridley Scott's Alien and the creature start fighting our dark knight. Then McTiernan's Predator comes in to the picture and he starts kicking ass.

    Great stuff. I can't wait for Sandy's next movie. It MUST be full length. 8/10
  • Warning: Spoilers
    *Spoiler* Alert!

    I recently downloaded this movie from the net after hearing people endlessly raving about it. Kevin Smith claims this is the best Batman movie ever made but of course he would say that, considering he has an ongoing feud with Tim Burton. This movie was unimaginative and offered nothing new to what I've already seen. In short, I could have made this movie if I had $30,000 to spend. I could definitely have come up with a better storyline than this, that's for sure. The Joker escapes from Arkham Asylum and Batman confronts him in a darkened alley but The Joker isn't the only foe he encounters. Batman has to fight an Alien and The Predator. The ending has Batman sandwiched between a group of Aliens and Predators and then the credits roll, how original is that? If Sandy Collora was offering Warner Bros. a lifeline to direct the then vacant Batman movie he offered nothing new. I'm glad it has since gone to Chris Nolan who is an extremely talented director and would love to see his take on Bats. I don't doubt Sandy Collora's love for comic books because I can tell he is a very passionate fan. I respect him for that but this movie is not innovative and is NOT the best Batman adaptation ever seen, that would be Tim Burton's Batman (1989).
  • Let's face it.

    The Batman films AB (After Burton) were just plain horrible. The "pepsi girl"'s commercials on "Bravo" sum it up: HOLLYWOOD CRAP!

    This short, however, gives us the down and dirty Batman we want - not that hokie 60's crap rolled up with 90's toy fetish and money worship.

    This is the most entertaining 8 minutes of film I have ever seen.
  • Grey tights would never work in a movie, right??!

    It is incredible that none of the Batman motion pictures has come even close to this. This is not a masterpiece, it is simply a peek at what should have been. Grey tights.

    In this short film the main character actually looks exactly like Batman. The visuals are right out of the book. Nothing is changed just for the sake of it or to promote egos in the production department.

    The Batman suit is not a thing of wonder, as can be seen in behind the scenes stills on the web. They simply made a Batman suit and lit and shot it right.

    The fights are gritty and have a nice mix of realism and fantasy. Sound effects are great, the music doesn't take over and drown the action. The pacing and photo lets you know what is going on. The sfx and sets are simple and effective. Like they should be.

    Sure it's amateurish here and there. Nothing that couldn't be fixed by hiring professional writers and editors. Those can be found in Hollywood. Most of all there's need for someone who can write good dialogue, and knows when the characters should shut up. Such people do not exist in Hollywood.

    What you are watching here IS Batman. And it's all so simple.

    Warner could have saved millions by putting out a quality Batman movie instead of one heap of latex manure after another.

    I wasn't overly thrilled with the Joker's prosthetic troll nose, but then on the other hand he looks worlds better than Jack Nicholson. Pretty much anything bad about this movie can be countered easily by saying that Warner did it worse. And that doesn't mean Dead End is all that, but rather that Hollywood is rubbish. Sad, actually.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Awesome, awesome. I'm talking about Bat's and J's look in the film of course. The story, wtf is going on. OK, so Bats chases Joker down after he escapes from Arkham. But then comes along .....

    ALIEN? This guy came out of nowhere. Honestly he grabs joker, can't eat him that fast, and then attacks Bats.

    Keep in mind this all "just happens" to be happening in an alley in Gotham.

    All of a sudden, Predator pops out. Shoots alien in the head, attacks Batman. Soon there's a whole army of Predators. ? This all happens in 7 minutes. It utterly cool looking, but horribly told. Take my word for it, if you want.

    *** out of 10
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I guess I'm a little late in discovering this gem. Collora really took a leap forward by going back to the basics. Like many here I'm a comic fan that grew up with the various television shows and comic stories. Batman is a character that is constantly undergoing changes due to various writers, artists and medium representations (film, television, comics, books). Still I think Collora really focused on the basics. His Batman looks great in the old gray outfit, no body armor, or muscle padding. Personally I didn't have a problem with Bartram's acting. It wasn't like he was given a lot of dialog. He pulled the fight scenes off just fine.

    That brings me to another point, Batman's fighting. As time has gone by Batman has become a great martial artists, the film BATMAN BEGINS does a good job of describing how he became such a skilled fighter. Still, in earlier versions Batman was more of a street fighter, less about martial art techniques and more about a hard hitting slugger. He had some training but wasn't the martial artist he is now ofter viewed as. I don't have a problem with Batman the martial artist, neither do I have a problem with Batman the street fighter. I think there is room for both representations. I don't know if this was Collora's intent or if he was just limited by time and money. Whatever the reason I like the way his Batman fought.

    The story isn't well defined but it doesn't need to be. The idea of Batman taking of a classic villain like the Joker and then crossover characters like AVP was cool. I bet most viewers were caught off guard when the film suddenly ended, having forgot that they were only watching an eight minute film. We the viewers wanted more. BTW, I think Koenig did fine as the Joker. Perhaps, even if Collora doesn't get the nod for a Batman film, Koenig might find a place in the Nolan Batman films.

    Obviously this film wasn't meant to have a beginning or an end, just a snippet of a story that makes the viewer wonder "What if?" With films often approaching or exceeding the 100 million dollar mark I often wonder where all the money goes. Collora made this film for a reported $30,000. If he were to have filmed a 2 hour film and kept the same level of effects, costumes and stage sets the cost would have been about $600,000. Now imagine if he were given $10 million to spend on sets and special effects, both CGI and traditional FX. My impression is that he could deliver a film that would appeal to many viewers and due to the low cost of production generate more money for the studios and DC than the Burton films, maybe even approaching the success of BATMAN BEGINS. It amazes me that studios give such men as David Goyer and Paul Anderson a shot at writing and directing while Collora has been passed over.
  • Clocking in at only eight minutes this fan film of Batman has more imagination than any previous version of the Dark Knight I've ever seen.

    I would have like the film to have been a few minutes longer though. So they could have developed the story more and had less of a cliffhanger ending. The actor they cast as Batman is also, physically, the most believable Batman yet. Michael Keaton was never quite right as Batman and Adam West was just too campy as the Dark Knight.

    Some people won't like the crossover of other famous movie characters appearing in the film, but I thought it was fun. The dialogue, what little there is, is a bit hokey, and could have been improved though.

    I'd love to see a feature length version of this film! Maybe Ben Affleck and Matt Damon at Project Greenlight should get the filmmakers of Dead End a million dollars in financing so they can add another eighty-two minutes of footage to the story! And viola! We have a Batman: Dead End feature! Filmmaker and fanboy Kevin Smith loved this film so maybe Kev can get financing!

    And if you read movie internet message boards a lot of hacks and wannabe filmmakers are ripping this film to pieces. I think they're just jealous cos they didn't have the balls or creativity to make their own Batman fan film.

    A good job! Imperfect, but still good!
  • barkbarkwoof22 February 2006
    Warning: Spoilers
    With apologies to Adam West, this is the only actor, Clark Bartram, I could almost believe is "really" Batman. It's too bad that they could never make the half a million dollar movie this would be if it was full length. The studios and copyright holders would never allow it. Most of the money comes from merchandising these days and I suspect that's all they're interested in as apposed to making a good movie.

    The problem with this feature is first and foremost too short. Just when things look grim for Batman it ends. I wanted to see more!

    If I were a producer and Sandy Collora showed me this as an example of what he would do I would back the movie.
  • I've known of this little Batman short for sometime now, but I didn't know how I would be able to see it. Well it finally hits me and I decide to hit up YouTube to check if they have it. Obviously they do, so I plopped myself down, got myself a Mountain Dew and watched an awesome 8 minute Batman short.

    Here's how it goes. Joker escapes from Arkham and Batman finds him in an alley. They do their usual "We both have problems" routine which was pretty well done since they do this all the time in the comics. Anyways after a little laughing and shoving, out of nowhere an Alien shows up. And as you Alien fans know, if there's an Alien around a Predator shouldn't be very far either. Since Predators hunt Aliens as a sport....if you didn't know. Anyways, what follows is sweet little piece of film-making with fantastic direction and cinematography. You can nit-pick till the cows come home about this or that, but when it comes down to it, this is one coolass short. My only problem was the Joker...the guy playing him looked the part, but did not sound the part. Sounded a little too "nerdy". Instead of sounding hysterically evil, he sounded hysterically nerdy. No biggie though.

    Just like Lobo's Paramilitary Christmas Special, this is another must see short that every comic-book fan should check out. 8.5 outta 10
  • BATMAN: DEAD END

    A Sandy Corolla feature

    The Joker (scenery-chewing Andrew Koenig) has escaped from Arkham asylum and Batman (Clark Bartram) chases him into a dark alley in the middle of a stormy night. What awaits in that alley might be the most dangerous foe Batman has ever met...

    "Batman" certainly is an established character. His appearance and name is well-known in most of the world, and the character has spawned comics (oh, excuse me, "graphic novels") for more than 60 years, as well as six feature films of varying cinematic importance. Ever since the cult phenomenon's start in 1939, there has been a huge fan base, which is evident in this fan film. Sandy Corolla takes the pretty ludicrous characters seriously, and gives the fans what they want.

    Clark Bartram, although he has few lines, is not bad as the Bat (certainly much better than George Clooney's and Val Kilmer's pathetic attempts of characterization). He works fairly well in his skintight costume, although it is a bit too bright to blend into the dark environment. While it's hard to not think of him as a fan jumping around in a cheap Halloween costume at times, his performance is above average.

    Andrew Koenig shows an energetic, if annoying performance as the Joker. He is all over the place chewing the scenery, but the script is pretty good and his lines are at least better than anything coming out of Arnold's mouth in the horrible "Batman & Robin". Corolla brings up the theory that the Joker is the "bastard child" of Batman, adding at least some depth to the characters.

    The action is somewhat bland, but the idea is good and the twist-in-the-end hilarious. It would be stupid to be too hard on this fan film, especially considering how bad it could have been (read: Batman & Robin). It's refreshing to see that a newbie director can, using no-name actors and a low budget, create a much better film than Joel Schumacher and his all-star cast were able to. 7 out of 10.
  • Batman Begins took the hint..this short made the three before it look worse than they did before..and I did not think that was possible. No ice skates in the bat boots..no Riddler (aka Riddilin) acting like a 6 year old who drank 2 gallons of mountain dew; despite the character he was playing was as a thinker not a spaz. Basically this made Batman look like a real person who has money to spend on toys and knows how to fight...I like it! The Koenig kid was convincing minus some bad coaching. His lines were a little off..the Joker I read growing up is more colorful. He did not write them so not his fault..but good..he looked nuts. Give this director a budget and I think he would be dangerous. If you get one..keep it gritty..keep it real..less Twister and more Oz! Angry this was not a trailer because I was looking forward to the movie.
  • This starts out quite nicely. The obligatory donning costume montage, which holds none of the embarrassment that both Schumacher films did in that respect. The voice-overs introducing us to the situation... cheap, and a story-telling crutch, but they get the job done(and even Kubrick used these). The appearances of the two leads, not bad. The Joker looks the way he does in the comics, and it works, like that of the bat himself, who has a costume very similar to that of the comics, as well. The two both look their parts pretty well(and Collora would later use Clark for Batman again in World's Finest, his mock-trailer). Their facing off is fine, if not without problems. Perhaps the biggest issue comes after this point in the short. Now, I can't reveal what that is, and you should maybe not read the cast-list before you've watched it, either. But that twist is probably the real biggie. Cool as it is, and what comes of it, and based on comics... it just doesn't make sense. Sacrificing logic for introducing something you(and the fans) really, really want in your short doesn't make you a good film-maker or story-teller. It's an amateurish trait, and you can't reveal those before you're in Hollywood and you've established that people will still pay to see what you put on the silver screen. A character is disposed of once he won't serve a purpose anymore. The characterization is reasonable, but The Joker doesn't come off as particularly convincing(partially because of the actors somewhat limited ability to, well, act), and the dialog could definitely do with some development(it should be noted that Collora is an artist, not a writer), and with how little there is... however, I must say that the establishing of the setting, the characters, the mood, it's all fairly well-done, and effective(this is less than six minutes long without the credits). From a technical standpoint, this is good. The camera-work, editing, fight choreography, stunt work, special effects... in those respects, everything is top-notch. But the story is, well, barely there at all(it's clear that this was a concept visualized, not a story). It isn't bad, and it definitely is a great attempt, and not just for an indie production, at portraying the dark knight the way he should be. It just won't stay in your mind for very long, at the very least not as much more than "an awesome short". The making of is worth a look, as well, it's interesting and put together well, even if every other sentence spoken by every single interviewee is "Sandy knows what he wants, and can show it to us". It's fifteen minutes long, and that is time well spent. To compare... both John Fiorella(who created Grayson) and Sandy Collora, of this and World's Finest, would need help in putting together a comic book film, at least if it was to hold up. Fiorella clearly gets the characters, and can put the images together, create the mood with very little outside funding, and can write good lines and ideas, and Sandy, well, has the contacts and can clearly put together a cool, gritty, bad-ass fight scene. They've both got the passion and know the material. And they are both too attached to the material to edit out what they can't develop enough. Fiorella gets my vote... I fear Sandy's feature would be riddled with weak character writing, equally unimpressive dialog, and, frankly, I have yet to see anything from him to convince me that he could put together a worthwhile story. If it's action, tone and feel you're looking for, without there necessarily being terribly much substance, this is a definite option. Fans of the characters really ought to also give Grayson some attention. I recommend this to fans of the DC characters. 7/10
  • tomorrowssecret20 August 2005
    I'm looking for something called characterization, which this film fails at.

    Looks nice sometimes, but over all... it lacks.

    Batman the worlds greatest fighter!!! Grabs a pipe and fights like a woman?!?!?

    Most of these fan films are all look, with nothing behind them. They are all poor man versions of Michael Bay. We need less of these people and more story tellers in Hollywood. Unless you want more Charlie's Angels movies.

    weak weak weak...
  • sage915_41110 February 2005
    I have watched the film and read all the post for and against this with open eyes... if one thing seems to be a key is that it evokes lots of passion no matter what side of the coin that the viewer stands on... My background is FX so from that point I was blown away... incredible... what I am amazed about is how most don't understand the cost and where did the $30k go... Admittedly I do not know much about fan-based film but what I do know is film (16mm roll-type) is VERY expensive to shoot on... it is not DV and will eat up a budget faster than a jet engine goes through fuel... we aren't talking Walmart film here guys... and post production can also get very expensive... I have been involved in some projects and I can't stress enough how much this costs... and then FX materials (Not talking payment of the artisans, just supplies) Sprinklers, gaffing, permits, CGI, flying actors in (at the very least accommodations)... it goes on and on until the money is quickly gone and this is all before the first take...

    OK my impression... Sandy has taken some high profile, extremely popular creatures / heroes and put them in one movie. why? because it sells...people love this THUS Freddie VS Jason... AVP... and others... does it make for great stories...well, no not exactly but the COOL factor is in full effect... we all loved King Kong VS Godzilla and Terminator VS Robocop... when doing this type of movie it is superficial by design... it relies on pure adrenaline to evoke passion from the audience... so the question is WHAT was Sandy trying to do... if this is the movie short he was going for then he hit a ball out of the park.. if it was to re-invent a character then it was a strike-out (to Para-phrase new tights does not a new bat make) I am not as critical over the acting... it is 8 minutes long... average screen time and amount of dialog per character in this short isn't nearly enough to "own" (or dis-own) a character. As far as show casing himself as a director...sure, why not? The use of lighting was effective for setting a mood... there were some very good shots (ok, to be fair there were also some mediocre shots that tried to be edgy, but that comes simply from lack of experience) a director is not a writer, he is presented with a story to be made to the best of his ability... if the story lacks substance then it better take another turn (such as a visual journey...which this does) I felt it was entertaining with a nice polish ... I would consider this a climatic scene in a larger story... sort of a slice and not by any means inclusive... from that point BRAVO!
  • This is a decent take on the Dark Knight Detective. The filmmaker has the look of Batman down, but unfortunately the whole thing falls apart real fast on the Aliens, then the Predators, show up. (Yes, that's correct. The Aliens (the acid-spewing kind) from "Aliens" and the Predators from the "Predator" movies.) Batman also became a slugger instead of a martial artist. Although I have to admit that the look is very nice, especially the use of tights rather than 50 pounds of rubber suits and plastic, er, nipples.
  • SimsKiefer11113 October 2006
    this isn't even a movie - it's just an 8 minutes of mayhem and range there isn't a start for it - there isn't an end - just a middle what do they expect the people to watch here a single scene of an entire movie ?

    it's really IS in a bad taste to end the movie right in the middle cause the viewer just feel betrayed and cheated cause he expected to see a story and he gets only half of it.

    i wouldn't bother watching it again, i wouldn't recommend it cause in the the bottom line there isn't anything to see here, and after all what there IS to see here ? a single scene without any form of a story (start middle end) ?
An error has occured. Please try again.