Add a Review

  • Visionary director Werner Herzog has explored innumerable landscapes throughout his career, from the wilds of Africa to the jungles of South America and the snow-capped peaks of the Himalayas. His latest project 'Enigma Of Loch Ness' takes him to the Scottish Highlands, where he plans to examine the myth of the Loch Ness Monster. Alongside him, a documentary crew- led by intrepid producer Zak Penn- film the proceedings as 'Enigma' goes into production. Though Herzog steadfastly disbelieves in the legend of Nessie, it seems that under the waters of the Loch something is stirring; something which may doom both productions to the cinematic shallows.

    'Incident at Loch Ness' is a funny mockumentary that satirizes the documentary format, as well as the public persona of the great Werner Herzog. Zak Penn's directorial debut, the film humorously portrays the notion of cinéma vérité as a Sisyphean ideal, also showing how the sensationalist machinations of producers and moneymen can hamper the filmmaking process. Though occasionally the jokes feel a tad on the nose and the narrative loses some impetus in the latter half; the comedy comes fast and frequent, and will assuredly have you laughing throughout.

    As will the caricature the film offers of Werner Herzog. Playing into and sending up his reputation as a profound, determined, borderline obsessive eccentric, the film's version of the director is not an over-the-top creation; more of a slyly, wryly heightened one (obviously written by someone with great admiration and affection for the man). Herzog's performance as himself is a masterclass in understated comedy. He exaggerates his mannerisms and style of speech subtly, never once verging into the overblown. The antics the film's Herzog engage in are madcap at times, but always played completely straight and in keeping with his established character, and his dialogue is consistently comical. It is a delight to see Herzog play such an amusing version of himself, and you'll surely remember his performance fondly.

    Less impressive are the supporting characters, both in terms of writing and performance. While the central figure of Herzog is amusing, the ostensible co-star of 'Incident at Loch Ness' Zak Penn is considerably less so. His caricature as a desperate producer insistent on cliches and sensationalist tactics is a one-note, irritating creation, and Penn's performance as same is mediocre at best. The other characters are underwritten, so that talents like Russell Williams II and Gabriel Beristain are left with relatively little to do.

    On the technical side, the film easily impresses. Like the best mockumentaries, such as 'This Is Spinal Tap' or 'Bob Roberts,' 'Incident at Loch Ness' doesn't overdo the technical conventions of documentary features, such as adding unnecessarily shaky cameras or grainy footage in an attempt to give the film a look grounded in realism. Instead, John Bailey's cinematography is reserved, professional and muted; in keeping with the actual style and look of documentaries. Abby Schwarzwalder and Howard E. Smith's editing must also be mentioned, as their consummate work adds to the effectiveness of the film's masquerade as truth.

    Though it is not in the same league as 'This Is Spinal Tap,' 'Incident at Loch Ness' is a funny mockumentary centered around a cinematic giant that is easy to watch and enjoy. Featuring a great self-parodying performance from Werner Herzog and an assured visual style, the film has plenty to boast about; though it also has its' detractions. The supporting cast aren't particularly impressive and the narrative and its' characters are unevenly written. However, it's got plenty of moments that'll have you laughing, and for any fan of Herzog, it's a must watch. In short, 'Incident at Loch Ness' is something of a mixed bag; but one with treasures a-plenty for the discerning viewer.
  • Like a big budget Blair Witch Project this is a clever and amusing con job that shows the manipulative power of the documentary but as the film becomes more and more preposterous and the con becomes more obvious the joke goes a bit flat.

    Lately the documentary genre has been messed with royally with blending opinion and personal agenda with fact mainly for entertainment value ala Michael Moore and Morgan Spurlock's Super Size Me, but this one side steps in yet another direction and seems to me to be satirizing the whole mocumentary process which would make it a joke within a joke and a true original. It's not entirely clear if this is the intent of the film, which only adds to the enigma. I like to think it is.

    It is refreshing to see a legend like Herzog willing to poke fun at his own obsessive reputation and it's his charismatic presence that carries the film.

    I don't know when the mocumentary first showed up in film but one of the first I recall that's well worth checking out if you like this sort of thing is Woody Allen's great from 1983: Zelig.
  • The film was shot in a mockumentary style. The plot tells about the events that took place at Loch Ness during the filming of a documentary about Werner Herzog. The first half of the plot is devoted to the preparations for filming. Backstage work is shown. But it's pretty interesting to watch. Very quickly you forget that you are watching a movie. Everything was filmed and edited in such a way that it feels like a real documentary. Plus the great and natural acting of the actors playing themselves. The ending sags a little when events develop too quickly. But overall, the movie is worth watching.
  • snake7716 December 2004
    Warning: Spoilers
    One long put-on. Anybody seeing this film thinking they are in for some kind of consciousness raising is in trouble. But if you want to see some Hollywood vets hamming it up and making fun of themselves (and the all too often self-serious documentary genre) you are in for a treat.

    The iconic Herzog is fabulously game, playing himself as the embattled "director" of a documentary about the legend of Loch Ness. Zak Penn plays the "producer" with devilish glee, sending up many of the arrogant sycophants he's no doubt worked with. As Herzog tries to make a serious film examining myth and reality, Penn hilariously decides that the "dramatic tension" would be enhanced by, among other things, making the sonar operator a bikini-clad sex bomb and filming a delightfully bad remote controlled fake "Nessie".

    Herzog discovers he's been tricked and threatens to quit, but ultimately decides to continue out of a misplaced sense of professional duty (or is it that he's starting to believe in the monster?). Then things get really weird, until the whole film happily disintegrates into a Blair Witch-style horror spoof. Everybody else in the "crew" gets in on the fun, and the laughs abound. It's great to see films folks satirize themselves (nobody does it better) and you'll have an enjoyable time going along with them.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Folks who are going to watch this movie expecting a documentary gone bad, should stay clear of this movie. Despite its clever advertising, this is pretty much just a "monster in the water" flick. It starts off as a documentary about the work of Werner Herzog, here he tells us briefly about his past films and briefly talks about his new documentary "Enigma Of Loch Ness." We are then introduced to the documentary crew, and we go through about an hour of production problems and the occasional hint that sh*t will hit the fan eventually, helped greatly by the quick sightings of something in the water. And funny enough you would actually believe that this really happened, but then the acting slowly heads off into the cheese ball factor with some over the top acting, yet still entertaining from Zak Penn. And not to mention the fact that a cgi hump keeps popping out of the water. The last 30 minutes of the film drifts from a freaky story about possibly something in the water, to a monster flick. Which granted I have no problem with. Overall the film is still entertaining, and a good watch, it features some moments which are a little creepy, and some of the special effects, though cgi, are still believable. If some of the "People wouldn't act like that in that situation" scenes were cut and the horror movie ending was taken out, I would have easily given this film a 9. But sadly it seemed to suffer from a little Hollywood syndrome, at least Zak Penn was smart in using the less is more technique, which worked to the movies advantage in some scenes.
  • Zak Penn produces a Werner Herzog Documentary set in Loch Ness. The difference between Truth and Fact are examined within the framework of an inquiry into the mythic monster.

    It's like an extended "Fishing with John" episode. Or a compendium of several episodes.

    The first half of this film is hilarious. Really. But it helps to be familiar with A. Herzog's films, B. Herzog's history, and C. the ironies of film-making in general.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Film maker Werner Herzog goes to Loch Ness to get behind the stories of the monster and then things begin to happen.

    The best way to see this film would be to see it completely blind, with no outside input or any notion what the film is or is not. The less you know the better I think you're enjoyment of the film will be. If you can manage just to see the film and not read about it, then do so and come back here later. If you need to read on the film, do so knowing that the more you know will change how you feel about the film.

    Spoilers ahead

    I find it difficult to write about this film with out giving too much away. Unfortunately simply by saying that gives too much away. The structure of this film is essentially a group of film students making a film about Herzog making a film. Its essentially a fake documentary about the making of a fake documentary. In the process it examines the nature of film and reality and belief. Its a film that is trying to mess with everyones head, both in the various films and in the audience, and if you take the film as a straight up documentary the first time through then you're in for a fun ride. If you know a little of whats going on you'll still enjoy it but some of what its trying to do will be lost (the film with in film, levels of reality is continued on the DVD and in its numerous easter eggs) I liked this movie. I think I would have liked it more had I not known that the entire thing was a put on when I saw it for the first time, since the film requires you to buy into whats happening as real for it to work for more than 20 minutes.

    If you like clever satire and the idea of the often pompous Werner Herzog sending himself up see this movie.
  • "Blair Witch Project" meets "Living in Oblivion" in this peculiar, gratuitously artsy-smartsy mockumentary about legendary German film director Werner Herzog's misadventures in Scotland, where he has traveled to make a film about the ethos of Nellie, the Loch Ness monster.

    The structure is film-within-a-film: a crew headed by John Bailey is shooting Herzog and his team making the "documentary" about Nellie. Featured on this film team are Zak Penn (he and others play themselves) as the self serving, sociopathic producer of the Nellie "doc"; Michael Karnow, an actor posing as a zany crypto-zoologist - meaning that he studies unclassified, mysterious life forms; Kitana Baker, a shapely young actress who is supposedly a sonar expert (inspiring salacious thoughts about plumbing her depths); and Herzog, of course, who by turns seems to be amused, edgily tolerant, or seriously irritated about the proceedings, which degenerate outrageously. It is made clear that Penn intends to employ large fake models to suggest Nellie in the water.

    Things get out of hand when an apparently real monster shows up to the party, sinks the boat the crew is using and wreaks other havoc resulting in the "deaths" of two of the crew (by then we know this is all fakery, though the actors keep up a mock seriousness about the disaster). Mr. Penn gets the final word in an interview with a reporter when he deadpans that the two who died surely made sacrifices, but they hardly compare with the sense of guilt he must live with for placing them in peril.

    In a way this film is like a Farrelly Brothers comedy (but made for Herzog groupies, rather than 12 year olds): it's silly without being very funny. In case the homage to Herzog is not apparent to somebody, brief footage from his films "Fitzcarraldo" and "My Best Fiend" is shown. Now, if only Herzog had tried to move Loch Ness to Romania for the shoot, then we'd have something. Herzog and Penn co-wrote and produced.

    Of course there's another possible take on this film, and a serious one at that. Herzog has long been interested in the question of whether films do or even can tell the truth. He gets into that issue a bit in "Loch Ness." He has coined the phrase, "ecstatic truth," as opposed to "factual truth" or fact. By ecstatic truth he means that one can employee fictional devices – fakery, if you will - in the service of larger, more essential truth telling.

    What filmmaker would disagree? Fellini, for one, always referred to himself, when making films, as "a liar." Yet I'm sure he would have felt misunderstood if one extrapolated from this self description the idea that he thought his films portrayed his personal history, human nature or Italy untruthfully. By, he meant simply that he used fictional contrivances and photographic sleight of hand to get at the essence of a story that at its core was truthful. For "ecstatic" one might substitute the term "essential" or "existential" depending upon the themes of a film.

    I think Herzog would agree that this issue pertains as much to documentary film-making as to fictional films. One is always selective in what to shoot, how to shoot it, and how to utilize the footage within the narrative and editing strategies chosen for the film. The seminal history of the documentary is steeped in sociopolitical propagandizing (e.g., the films of John Grierson or Dziga Vertov) and fictionalizing, for that matter (e.g., the work of Robert Flaherty).

    Herzog and Penn could easily be seen as toying with these notions of relativism and subjectivity in making "truthful" documentaries. Perhaps they captured in this kinky movie something of the essence or ethos of Nellie, or Nellie seekers, after all. My rating: 6/10 (B-) (B+ for Herzog devotees). (Seen on 12/12/04). If you'd like to read more of my reviews, send me a message for directions to my websites.
  • The film appears to be a documentary about John Bailey making a documentary, "Herzog in Wonderland", about director Werner Herzog, who is himself undertaking a documentary seeking the truth behind the Loch Ness Monster and the cultural facts that lead to such beliefs. We witness Herzog and his crew from the earliest stages of their supposed documentary. Problems begin creeping up almost immediately, growing in severity until everyone's documentaries are abandoned in a climactic horrific incident--the Incident at Loch Ness.

    This is really a brilliant film. The appearance is just a conceit. What's really going on is a very clever nested mockumentary that is basically This is Spinal Tap (1984) meets The Blair Witch Project (1999) in attitude and tone, with the twist that our protagonists are not fictional characters, but real people playing spoofed version of themselves.

    Similar to some other recent faux documentaries, Incident at Loch Ness plays with the difference between truth and falsehood, fact and fiction, cinematic illusions and reality, while explicitly claiming to explore the same, occasionally untruthfully, in a cinematic equivalent to Epimenides' famous paradox, where a Cretan is claiming that "All Cretans are liars". It's sly enough to even make a committed postmodernist's head spin, and unlike other attempts at similar material from other filmmakers, Incident at Loch Ness has insightful things to say on many different levels--the postmodern playfulness isn't just pretentious here.

    In fact, this is the film, minus the humor perhaps, that The Blair Witch Project and The Last Broadcast (1988) wanted to be. Unlike those films, here documentary really seems like documentary. First-time director Zak Penn (who is an experienced screenwriter) is smart and knowledgeable enough to know that documentaries (and even home movies) do not tend to look like they were filmed by someone having a seizure (both BWP and TLB), and they do not tend to feature monotone, extremely amateur comments from the faux interviewees which are then arbitrarily edited into frequently repeating snippets (TLB). Penn's intelligent approach results in Incident at Loch Ness feeling "real", which is exactly what it needs to do. The verisimilitude is only belied by the very funny, increasingly absurdest plot, when we're firmly in This is Spinal Tap territory.

    Like This is Spinal Tap, Incident at Loch Ness is as funny as it is because it is so close to the truth. It only slightly exaggerates what really happens in the world of film and television--the ridiculous moves by producers in the hope of creating a more profitable product, the personality clashes and often "political" and subversive machinations in behind-the-scenes relationships, the toying with "the real" in reality shows and documentaries--giving the satire a lot more weight. For Herzog fans, there is a hilarious spoof overview of his past work near the beginning of the film, and fans will also simply delight in Herzog being able to poke fun at himself so easily and naturalistically.

    But in trumping BWP and TLB, Incident at Loch Ness is a very realistic horror film as well, with horror coming not only in the climax when some characters end up dead, but all throughout the film with various minor disasters/problems, all threatening to send the feigned Herzog documentary to hell in a hand basket.

    Incident at Loch Ness wouldn't have worked without excellent performances, making it even more notable in that the majority of the cast are not most well known, or even very experienced in some cases, as actors. The DVD is worth checking out, as Penn and Herzog do the main commentary in character. There are ample deleted scenes and lots of Easter eggs, as well, including hidden "serious" commentary.
  • I'm serious. If you have gotten this far, you have probably already read too many reviews.

    This film is best experienced cold, with no presumptions or prior information. I very much enjoy sharing this film with others, but I have to conceal what that night's showing will be to keep them from looking it up ahead of time.

    Go watch the film as virgin as you can be. Then come back and discuss it.

    (p.s. -- It is not essential to be familiar with Werner Herzog's body of work before seeing this film. But it sure helps.)
  • oscar-2610 July 2007
    Warning: Spoilers
    What's the point? Hasn't this been done before, better? And again? Why is Werner Herzog wasting his good talents and time with junk like this? Shouldn't he be shooting a movie somewhere--I mean a real movie?

    It all felt fake from the beginning. Werner Herzog would never have sought to make a film about the Loch Ness myth--at least not on such a small scale surrounded by losers--so the plot was not believable from the beginning. The actors who are supposed to act like they're not acting were obviously acting. The story was not interesting, the "everyday people" requisite in every mockumentary were invisible, the personalities were stale, the jokes were not funny, the effects were unconvincing and the ending was nowhere to be seen.

    I just don't see the point. It's a fake movie about a fake movie. Hah, hah. Perhaps if those who thought up such a movie sought to make one that mocked people who really were out to find a real Nessie, now that could have had some potential. But Herzog is not a believer and never claimed to be. A mockumentary about the cryptozoologist crowd would have had so much more fuel.

    It was a miss.
  • My wife watched this for 45 min before asking me if this was a fake documentary as I did not let on when I put it on for us.

    I really enjoyed this movie.Herzog is both a huge ham and absolutely sincere at the same time, what a joy to listen to him talk.Penn as the "producer" is great as he trys to improve the movie with a bit of sex and silly props,he manages slim quite nicely and it is obvious he enjoyed playing the roll.

    This show is basically a movie within a movie, a Documentary about Herzogs making his latest documentary on the Loc Ness monster(and the fact that it is a myth). It is cleverly done and even manages to make one jump a couple of times.

    Tongue in cheek and gently amusing, certainly worth watching.
  • I enjoyed this movie immensely - at least the first 2/3 of it which means that the movie worked pretty well. The characters were excellent - Herzog was a highly watchable character - you just wonder what is going to say and do next. Zak Penn was a great counterpoint to Herzog in a number of memorable scenes. The cameraman, sound-man and esp. the sonar operator lady were all a blast. And it will be hard to forget the cryptozoologist and his inanely fantastic presence.

    I really enjoyed how the movie was done in a 'reality-tv' documentary style - you have some narration, action scenes and clips of the individuals commenting on what they were doing/thinking as events unfolded.

    Some of the scenes, like the one with the sonar operator, were a real comic treat.

    The serious tone of all the characters was excellently carried out and were the perfect backdrop for any kind of comedy.

    Where the movie founders a bit is that the lighting is pretty morose and the colors were pretty 'dry'. Maybe this was done of purpose, but I believe it would have been better with better with a brighter lighting.

    Without spoiling anything at all, the last 1/3 could have been improved by simply continuing in the same manner of the first 2/3. Instead the movie became a bit different and I don't think worked as well.

    In this movie, the characters and their interactions with each other proved immensely more interesting than even their enigmatic subject matter.
  • Christopher Guest is the master of the mockumentary. Werner Herzog is one of many documentary greats out there. Zak Penn isn't good at either but he could certainly take a lesson from the other two. Guest often plays around with reality and fiction but the line between the two is always clear in his films, sort of an essential with a mockumentary. Penn could also take a lesson from the The Blair Witch Project. Even though you knew it was a fake documentary going in you totally bought into the world the filmmakers created. It seems to the audience as if the whole thing is real even though you know, deep down, you're watching fiction. In other words, it was fiction successfully disguised as truth. In fact many early audiences watching it, at Sundance and other premiere audiences thought it was real. Penn, whose forte, by his own admission, is screen writing, should probably stick to that. Documentary or mockumentary film-making (and it's hard to tell where one begins and the other ends with this film) is obviously not.

    Penn sets the stage for what he tries to sell as a legit documentary on the filming of a documentary, sort of a meta-documentary. Penn, however, confuses the audience, and loses their trust, from the get-go as he enters Herzog's house before the filming of Herzog's film, "Enigma of Loch Ness" about the myth of the Loch Ness monster (a film which apparently was never finished – probably because of Penn's interference). Even though Penn is apparently the director of the film we're watching, he starts it by looking at the cameras and saying, "What is the film crew doing here?" and starts shying away from them. He does this on a couple other occasions as well. He will stop and tell the cameras to stop filming, thus forcing the camera guy to hide in the shadows to pick up snippets of dialogue between Herzog and Penn. It seems to be a gimmick, but that is never made clear, and Penn is apparently keeping us in the dark intentionally. This leaves the audience scratching its head wondering, "Who is in charge here?" If Penn is working against his own film crew what kind of a world are we a part of? This is just one of many examples of how he confuses the line between reality and fiction.

    Penn seems to only fully enter the fictional world (I think) when the crew has sightings of what appears to be the Loch Ness monster. But by the time the monster makes its first appearance we have totally exited the fictional world Penn has attempted to create, so it all just seems silly and pointless.

    This is a potentially fascinating movie and a real missed opportunity in that Penn has a chance to document a master at work, but completely loses focus and it becomes a movie about Penn and his antics instead of the filming of a documentary. Penn's presence begins to pervade and overshadow everything else in the movie.

    The Herzog interviews are convincing and we actually believe he isn't acting. We even start to wonder if he and others on his crew are being duped by Penn, much the way the audience is, but you're never sure of even that. Penn, in his interviews to the camera, attempts to be quirky and unintentionally funny, like the characters interviewed in a Guest mockumentary, but he only succeeds in being annoying. In a Guest film this effect is hilarious, while here it falls flat because you're never sure what Penn is about. As a result we, the audience, start to dislike him as much as the crew apparently does. Aside from the beautiful scenery and the superfluous appearance, out of nowhere, of a beautiful model, thrown in to give the movie spice, there is little to recommend here. Perhaps its only redeeming quality (an unintentional one at that) is that it's a great example of why the audience is important; and by completely ignoring the conventions of storytelling your doing them a disservice. For that reason alone I think this would be a good film to show to film students – sort of a "what not to do" kind of movie. I have nothing against a movie told in an unconventional way as long it's done skillfully, with a thematic base to give it substance. This film is completely lacking in that.

    I'd like to call it a valiant effort at something, but I'm not sure what it is, other than a complete mess and ultimately a waste of time.

    (As a side note: It seems like bad art always calls to mind good. This film made me think of the book "Picture" by Lillian Ross. Ross followed John Huston around during the filming of "The Red Badge of Courage" and brilliantly documented it for the New Yorker. It would make a great movie in fact. If you want a great example of meta-art, read it.)
  • The previous user who compared this film to the 'Fishing With John' series has it down fabulously. However, I have to disagree that you need to know anything about Herzog to enjoy the film. All you need to know is supplied in the very deftly-handled exposition.

    I'd also compare it to LOST IN LA MANCHA... except, well. And it's kinda like WAITING FOR GUFFMAN, but... but mostly, it's very like THE BL-... well, I should shut up.

    All I can say is that the film is proof that there is *something* to this latest onslaught of documentaries. There is great value in the language they use to convey a story and the self-reflexive possibilities are now endless, thanks to Zak Penn.

    See this film.
  • I first rented this film because I am a fan of Werner Herzog and had a suspicion that this was going to be a mockumentary. I guess that this kind of peaked my curiosity because Herzog seems to be such an unlikely person to be involved in a project like this. Herzog always seemed to be a very serious director and film maker. For me this is what really makes this film interesting. Everybody knows the stereotype of the German director; stern, resolute and at times tyrannical. I don't think that Herzog at any time fitted this stereotype, but he's always came of to me as being a serious film maker. This was different.

    The story is that Herzog is brought on a production by Zak Penn. The project is to make a documentary about the Loch Ness Monster. They actually got some pretty qualified people to be involved in it. At first it seems to be really serious. However, things get goofy as Penn tries to make a commercial production out of the endeavor. He brings in a crack pot scientist and a former Playmate who is supposed to be an expert on sonar (the fact that she was wearing an American Flag bikini while setting a sonar sensor in the water should give everyone a hint as to why she was there). Tension builds between Herzog and Penn because of the attempts to turn the documentary into some Hollywood production. The crew begins to realize that the Loch Ness Monster may be real after strange things begin happening to the boat during the production.

    All in all, it's pretty funny. Herzog did a good job (even though he was playing himself) and the others were pretty believable too. At times, the jokes seemed a little too set up. At one point, Penn points a flare gun at Herzog's head and orders him to film a fake monster (anyone who has heard about the rumor that Herzog did this to Klaus Kinski should realize that this was too perfect to not have been set up). Penn also makes a joke about dragging a boat over a mountain (Fitzcarraldo joke). They intentionally misspelled expedition (expeditition) on the back of their jump suits for God's sake. At other times, it is much more subtle. The production value had to have been at least decent, even though it is intended to be a B campy movie. If you take it seriously, you're not going to like it.

    Oh, and check out the commentary on the DVD. If you didn't believe that this was a fake before, you'll get it after the commentary.
  • What if acclaimed film director Werner Herzog set out to film a documentary about the myth of the Loch Ness monster? Lucky for us, we get to find out because their is a film crew working on a doc about Herzog's life. So he sets out on Loch Ness with an interesting cast of characters to try to make his film. These characters are all played by people ostensibly playing themselves or caricatures of themselves, including Hollywood writer Zak Penn as producer, a famous cinematographer and sound guy, a whacked out mythical creature expert, a captain, and...a Playboy model posing as a sonar reader? It is clear from the moment they aboard their small boat that Herzog and Penn (and his little mechanical Nessie!) have completely different ideas of which direction the movie should go.

    While this movie pretty much has a unique premise (a documentary crew filming a documentary crew, both of which aren't real), it seems to borrow (intentionally) from both "The Blair Witch Project" and mockumentaries by Christopher Guest. The first half is loaded with subtle humor that is actually drier than those you'd find in a Guest comedy, if you can believe that. Really the only scenes that had me chuckling are the ones with the crazy mythical creature "doctor." Penn's portrayal of himself as a typical Hollywood jerk is incredibly obnoxious, which means that he did a successful job. I'm not a big Herzog fan, and frankly I found him (or his character) to be rather unlikeable. The movie takes a twist in the middle and it drowns in darker and more horrific territory while still trying to retain its dry humor. I'm not sure if it is successful, but it will definitely hold your interest.

    But the biggest oddity about this is its basic premise. Why would Werner Herzog make a serious documentary about the Loch Ness monster?! Maybe that is the punchline. Herzog purports to be more interested in the mythology behind the monster, not in actually encountering the monster. Then why go on a boat into the lake at all? Why not focus on interviewing people in the area and real experts on mythology? Obviously there would be no movie without this, and because the movie seems to blur the line between fact and fiction, I suppose it is unconventionally appropriate. On a sidenote, this DVD contains more special features than anyone could possibly ever care about!
  • Incident at Loch Ness is a bit frustrating, because the premise was one that could've led to something great. A mockumentary about Werner Herzog and some other people trying to make a film about the Loch Ness Monster, done in a mockumentary style? It sounds amazing on paper, with Herzog playing himself and things reflecting the real-life chaotic productions he's helmed.

    There are funny moments and brief bursts of genuine cleverness, but I wish they'd either pushed things a bit further toward horror or comedy; it felt like it occupied a kind of mild middle ground a lot of the time. Some jokes are over-explained, and others are underdeveloped. Herzog gives an amazing performance as a caricature of himself, though - I feel like this film's worth watching just for that, as other parts left me a bit disappointed.
  • This is an amusing mockumentary created by Zak Penn of Suspect Zero fame and Werner Herzog of Klaus Kinski fame. Zak Penn should really do more live comedy; he is very funny at times. I had no idea Herzog could do the Blair Witch project type film with a straight face; he is a pretty good actor as well. Although not as funny as Meathead's rock mockumentary, it is still pretty entertaining. The "hunt" for the Loch Ness monster creates a hilarious series of events, resulting in the death of two of the crew. The producer will tell you exactly how funny that is at the conclusion of the film. After the slow start, the film does pick up.
  • Who knew that Werner Herzog – the director of "Aguirre: the Wrath of God", "Fitzcarraldo", and other weighty dramas -- could do comedy? Herzog proves it here in Zak Penn's terrific send-up of "the making of the movie" documentary.

    "Incident at Loch" purports to document a film Herzog sets out to make in Scotland about the Loch Ness monster. Overseeing the production is Penn, a successful screenwriter. Along for the ride are a famous cinematographer, an Academy award winning sound man, a Playboy model, and a radio controlled six-foot "Nessie."

    Penn puts it all together in a clever, inventive way. The result is one of the most original – and funniest – movies of the year.
  • A documentary (Herzog in Wonderland) about a documentary by Werner Herzog (Enigma of Loch Ness) about Loch Nes and it's monster.

    The comedy in this movie is deep seeded and not typical to any other comedy in the world.

    It does get dull at moments but towards the end it takes a great twist that sci-fi/horror/adventure fans will love.

    It's also a great time-passer (See my Sarah Silverman: Jesus is Magic review) Zak Penn is a great villain you'll love to hate and does a great job in his directorial debut.

    It's one of those rare love it or like it movies. You most likely won't hate this movie. If you start getting bored, just trust me and wait till the end.
  • I caught this film on the Independent Film Channel, having no idea what it was. My reaction to this movie progressed as follows: mild boredom, strong boredom, some interest when they get to Loch Ness, confusion, (looked up film on IMDb), some amusement, then finally disappointment.

    The first 20 minutes of the film are dull as dishwater and don't work either as documentary or docu-parody. Endless footage of Herzog's party and the filmmaker wandering around aimlessly. Once the joke really starts to kick in (basically when we get on the water) there are some mildly amusing moments. But the cast is rather wooden throughout, and the joke is ultimately spread too thin. Herzog is simultaneously not famous enough to really hold my interest or for me to get all the in-jokes (which are over-explained anyhow), yet too famous to "become" the role (would a real producer second-guess this formidable film legend?) A nice try but ultimately it's not really funny.
  • This film is answers the age-old question, "what would a Herzog documentary look like if taken the way of Spinal Tap?" That's right, after decades of stunning works and intimate studies, Herzog has finally gone and made (or at least involved himself in)... a Mockumentary.

    I caught this on the Canadian Documentary channel the other night and was floored by Herzog's famously dry wit, and the utter ridiculousness of the film itself. It's essentially a Herzog project where all pretense of objectivity is supposedly embedded within one film crew as it studies the workings of yet another in the creation of a second Herzog documentary. This documentary is a study of the "Loch Ness" phenomenon, one aimed at taking Herzog's incisive wit (superb UFO quote in the beginning of the film) and great eye to the people involved with, and the history of the subject. OK, straight forward enough. But when a series of events begin to cripple the production, Herzog and his merry band are ultimately drawn into a situation even murkier than the depths of the lake they're studying...

    Typical film class issues like Herzog's use of truth vs. the lies implicit in film are given a tongue-in-cheek treatment as the two crews begin to bicker and expose one another, and recurrent themes like Herzog vs. big boats (Fitzcarraldo) are made light of and just as quickly thrown about the wayside, alongside any semblance of reason or prudence. What is left is a fascinating exploration of what a funny sense of humor Herzog has, I mean, who else could include a cameo by Jeff Goldblum, the crew of a boat searching for a mythical fish, ridiculous matching jumpsuits, and clever references to Jacques Cousteau without incurring the wrath of Wes Anderson? Oh, yeah, this film also features brief, albeit fitting, appearances by Crispin Glover and Yucca roots. Genius!!!
  • Had anybody told me that Werner Herzog would star in and co-write a film directed by the screenwriter who brought us X2, X-Men: The Last Stand, Last Action Hero, Inspector Gadget, Elektra and The Incredible Hulk, it is likely that I would have silently turned and walked away.

    But here it is, a collaboration between big-money Hollywood writer Zak Penn and one of the world's few truly independent film-makers, the irascible and intense Werner Herzog. And what is this film about? The film lampoons Herzog, Penn, and film in general by posing as a documentary about Herzog making a documentary about the Loch Ness monster. Aside from Nessy herself, and the bizarre cast of characters Penn puts together with or without consulting Herzog (e.g. Kitana Baker is hired to play a sonar technician in a red white and blue bikini, for example), the film comedically plays upon the cliché relationship between director and producer.

    Some of my fellow reviewers have described this film as a hybrid of Blair Witch, Cloverfield, The Last Broadcast, etc. From my perspective, this film is more closely related to Herzog's Wild Blue Yonder, David Lynch's Inland Empire, and Robert Altman's The Player.

    Playing himself, Herzog is a familiar character to most serious film watchers. Penn, however, is a bit of a wildcard. He is producing Herzog's Loch Ness Monster deconstruction, he says, because he wants to become a more credible and respected film-maker. And yet most of what he does throughout the film shows him to be epically incompetent and more interested in salesmanship than authenticity. Just as the comedic aspect of the film's central conflict reaches a crescendo, reality itself makes a guest appearance, in the most unlikely form imaginable.

    Herzogians will 'get' this film. Fans of Zak Penn might not, as it does not fit anywhere within the context he has established for himself so far. If Zak is good enough for Herzog, then perhaps I need to pay a little more attention to him in the future.

    Incident at Loch Ness is not exactly hilarious. Instead, it is a rather low-key, high-brow, comedy. The film plays with typical Herzog themes, but, as a light satire, never reaches the depth and detail of his usual treatments. Herzog fans will recognize some of the playfulness of Wild Blue Yonder in this film. Incident at Loch Ness also plays nicely upon the many documentaries that have been made about Herzog himself, his methods, and his relationships. Penn does a particularly good job of centering the film on Herzog (who is such an intense, charismatic and interesting person that it would be difficult to do otherwise) without making a Herzog film, or even letting Herzog dominate the film. Furthermore, and improbably, Penn's film is entirely coherent and well-paced. The documentary feel is very well achieved, although the film is so clearly fictional that suspension of disbelief is required, especially after the first half of the film. The acting, especially by the many non-actors that compose most of the cast, is terrifically sincere and very credible.

    Recommended for Herzog fans, and people who enjoy Hollywood reflexivism and self-parody.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I wish that all the mockumentaries and horror spoofs would go away. If you are going to investigate loch ness..do it for real. Enough of the bull****. Same with horror and sci-fi..if you are going to make a movie and it is supposed to be scary..make it scary..not funny. I hate when watching a horror movie and the character is fighting for their life(or running or whatever..their life is at stake) and they are cracking jokes. This never happens..cmon where have all the good directors gone? I think horror and sci-fi have really gone down the tube since the 70's. I long for the days that a horror flick was scary..all this "scary movie" crap is for the birds. This film is also for the birds. If you really would like to see a good investigation or here serious talk...don't expect it in this video.
An error has occured. Please try again.