User Reviews (143)

Add a Review

  • Warning: Spoilers
    Possible Spoilers

    'Ladies in Lavender' is an example of the genre which has become known as 'Heritage Cinema'. The term is generally used to describe films set in the past, often in the nineteenth or early twentieth century, and which aim for a detailed recreation of the period. Plots are often taken from literary sources, there is often (but not always) an emphasis on the wealthy or well-to-do sections of society, the films tend to concentrate on emotions and psychology rather than dramatic physical action, and are often very visually attractive with lovingly shot photography of the scenery that forms the backdrop to the action. Although the genre is sometimes criticised as being backward-looking or over-conservative, it is one in which it is possible to work creatively and one in which much good work has been done in recent years, especially in Britain.

    The film is set in the 1930s and centres around two elderly sisters, Janet (a widow) and Ursula (a spinster), two live together in a cottage by the sea in Cornwall. (For non-British readers, this is a rural county in the extreme south-west of England). Their lives are changed one morning after a stormy night when they discover a young man cast up on the beach after being washed overboard from a ship. They take the stranger back to their cottage where they care for him and nurse him back to health. They discover that he is Polish, that his name is Andrea and that he is a talented violinist. A romance develops between Andrea and Olga Daniloff, a Russian émigré artist, whose brother is himself a famous violinist and takes Andrea under his wing as his protégé. This romance, however, arouses the jealousy of Ursula, who has herself developed feelings for the young man. Andrea and Olga also arouse the suspicion of the locals, especially when they are heard speaking German (their only shared language) together; this is the period leading up to the Second World War, and anyone believed to be German is regarded with deep distrust.

    Like many 'heritage cinema' pictures, this one makes good use of the scenery; there is some fine photography of the Cornish landscapes. Nigel Hess's music also plays an important part; I understand that he composed not only the incidental music but also the wonderful violin concerto which we hear Andrea playing in a concert near the end of the film. (This was supposedly composed by Boris Daniloff for Andrea to play. It did seem a little too conservative in style for the 1930s, but possibly Daniloff was a follower of, say, Rachmaninov rather than the likes of Stravinsky).

    What really makes the film a success, however, is the fine acting. The two Dames, Judi Dench and Maggie Smith, are two of the best actresses of their generation in Britain. (They were born within three weeks of each other in December 1934). Both give marvelous performances here, bringing out the differing individual personalities of the two sisters. Janet is the dominant personality, Ursula the quieter, more passive one. Judi Dench shows us the full tragedy of Ursula's situation. Unlike her sister, whose husband died in the Great War, has never previously been in love with a man; she only falls in love when it is too late and her love is an impossible one for a much younger man. There is some enjoyable comic relief from Miriam Margolyes as Dorcas, the sisters' loyal but outspoken housekeeper. Daniel Bruehl is also very good in a trilingual performance as Andrea. (He has to speak dialogue not only in his native German but also in English and Polish).

    I had never heard of William J. Locke, who wrote the short story on which this film was based. I understand that he was a popular and prolific author in the Britain of the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, but he now seems almost completely forgotten. Literary survival, however, is often as much a matter of fashion and chance as of merit, and many fine stories have been written by authors whom we do not remember today. In his directorial debut Charles Dance has shown that even the works of a neglected author can form the basis of a fine film. This is a memorable tale of love and longing. 8/10
  • This film bursts into life in a few electrifying scenes - but these scenes are perhaps muted by the general leisurely air of the whole.

    What can be said is that this film belongs to Maggie Smith: although Judi Dench has the lovelorn role of the smitten sister, it is Dame Maggie who has the wider variety of emotions, the presence, and the charisma which gives the film the energy it needs to involve the viewer. A case in point is the scene where Dame Judi has her point of emotional release - and Dame Maggie tops it with just the slightest nuance of phrase. Indeed, hers is a performance of subtlety and delicacy, so understated and insightful, that it recalls the outstanding work that she did in "The Lonely Passion of Judith Hearne". If it was up to me, Dame Maggie would be right up there in contention for the Oscar and BAFTA.

    She is, of course, perfectly paired with Dame Judi, who creates a portrayal of both pathos and charm. There is such rapport between the two that it wipes away memories of the caricatures of "Tea With Mussolini" and replaces it with genuine truth and humanity. The two dames are underscored by the comic bluster of Miriam Margolyes and the suspicious lusting of David Warner.

    This is a film of emotion and elegance. If it lacks narrative drive and dynamic then it is more than made up for by the space created for the talents of the actors. It is a film which lives on in the memory - and for that we mainly have to thank the performance of Maggie Smith.
  • Delicate and unpretentious, this story of an old lady's infatuation with a young violinist is like a refreshing whiff of air amidst the sultry stench of brouhaha "fat-cash" movies that contaminate the silver screen this summer. Its overall impressionistic and bland atmosphere of old rural England with seemingly plain, but emotionally tense story has a mollifying effect on our senses, long warped by clink-clank of special effects and overblown plots.

    If one has to compare this film with other forms of art, "Ladies in Lavender" feels like a fine piece of vintage literature, transfered on screen and complemented with exquisite acting and gorgeous music. At the same time, it is so much "slice-of-life" story thanks to meticulous nuances in depicting the characters' lifestyle and subtle performances of the film's main stars.

    Contrary to some reviews, I don't have an impression that the story is deficient or lacks in details. I find it rather complete and coherent. Moreover, I think that giving any additional background information on the characters would have only diluted the story. The director's objective is clearly to focus on the internal feelings of the two old sisters and for that enough information is provided in their own comments. After all, it's not the story of the stranger that is so important; but the story of their loneliness and attachment to this young man that is the cornerstone of the plot.

    Not as shattering as some more action-driven movies, this film is a good treat for those who want to get away from the din of our modern life and enjoy some excellent music for precious one and a half hours.
  • Beautifully acted. The delineation of sibling rivalry between the two sisters, Ursula and Joan (Judi Dench and Maggie Smith, is a masterclass in itself. And what a treat to be entertained by Miriam Margoyes. Her Dorcas is the perfect foil for the two prim spinsters.

    The script is finely wrought and the understated English humour a joy. There are moments when you just have to laugh out loud. At other times your empathy for the characters moves you to deep sadness and regret at lives that have had times of sorrow or been unfulfilled.

    The visual imagery in this film is evokes the nostalgic feel of an English rural landscape of sixty years ago. The beautiful cinematography was complemented by the musical score.

    This is the second English film in two weeks I have been really impressed by.
  • The story is rather simple. Two old ladies living in rural English countryside rescue a drowning foreign young violinist and one of them develops an infatuation over him. But he actually gets attracted to a local German painter. But the execution of the plot is so subtle and so melancholy it is bound to make you keep thinking about it.

    Both Judi Dench and Maggie Smith are at their bests, Dench probably showing a broader range of emotions. Daniel Brüll is also quite worth mentioning as the young dreamy-eyed violinist. Natasha McElhone gives a solid supporting act. And it's a real treat to the ears by Joshua Bell, who masterfully played all the violin compositions.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Charles Dance, the actor, has chosen the short story by William J Locke, as the basis for his film. "Ladies in Lavender" seems to have been tailor made for its two stars.

    This is the story of a young man that is found by two lonely sisters living above the beach. These ladies, of a certain age, take the young man into their home and tend to his wounds. Janet, a widow, and Ursula, her spinster sister, live comfortably in a cinematically beautiful, if somehow faded, elegant house.

    The young visitor becomes the object of Ursula's attention. This kind soul hasn't had any man in her life, or so it seems. Andrea, who they discover is Polish, awakens a tender love in Ursula. Janet senses there is trouble if this situation is left unchecked, but she goes along catering to Andrea's needs.

    Both ladies discover that Andrea is a violinist, by profession. They contact the local fiddler so he can lend Andrea his instrument. The young man amazes everyone by playing wonderful tunes that attract the attention of a young German painter visiting the area and overhears the music coming from the cottage. Janet and Ursula don't want anything to do with this young woman intruding in their house, but as fate would have it, she ends up taking the young man away to fame and fortune.

    The story is neatly arranged for the screen. There's is no logic in how the young man arrives and why don't these two conservative women notify the local authorities. For all practical purposes, Andrea might be a dangerous person. A lot of questions about the absurdity of the situation are never answered by the screen play, let alone how Andrea, in a matter of days, by the magic of the movies, becomes a soloist with the BBC Symphony orchestra, something that perhaps better and more talented musicians never get to do in their lives!

    "Ladies in Lavender" is the perfect way to spend almost two hours in the company of Judi Dench and Maggie Smith, two of the most beloved grand dames of the English cinema. Daniel Bruhl is a charismatic actor, as he already showed in "Goodbye Lenin", and he is as good here. Natasha McElhone, a beautiful actress plays Olga. Miriam Margoyles plays the maid and David Warner is seen as the local doctor.

    This film will reward all fans of Maggie Smith and Judi Dench.
  • "Ladies in Lavender" (2004) is a film starring two of the best British actresses, Dame Judy Dench and Dame Maggie Smith as two lonely sisters, a widow and an old maid who live quietly and uneventfully in their cottage on the seaside in Cornwall, England. The film takes place in 1936 before the WWII begins. One morning, the sisters discover a young man, almost a boy injured and washed ashore near their home and their lives were changed forever. The sisters take the boy in and care for him. As time passes, they learn that Andrea was on the ship heading to America where he hoped to become a professional musician. Andrea is extremely talented violinist and one day, his playing attracts the attention of a young Russian woman -painter, Olga who lives in the village. Olga's brother is a world renowned violinist and she is ready to offer the boy the chance of his life but the sisters, especially Ursula (Dench) seems very reluctant to let Andrea and Olga communicate. Ursula who never been married feels deep tenderness, warmth, and longing for Andrea that she has difficulty to hide. Her sister who is very close and compassionate to her sees quite well what goes on but she also understands that some dreams would always stay just the beautiful dreams...

    The main reason to see the movie is acting and chemistry between two beloved actresses, both in their 70s and both on the top of their profession. As for the story of two lonely elderly sisters in their coastal home, it was told better in Lindsay Anderson's "Whales in August" (1987) that starred Bette Davis and Lillian Gish, and Anderson's film does not have a young foreign boy to make it compelling and moving. The verbal and silent communication between two sisters as played by Gish and Davis makes the earlier movie a quiet and poignant gem. As for the unrequited tender vulnerable love that comes when one least expects it and that makes the life of an older person heaven and hell at the same time, watch "Death in Venice", the tragic masterpiece by Luchino Visconti.
  • Short stories often make better films than full novels as is evident in the case of JD Locke's 'Ladies in Lavender' as adapted for the screen and directed by the multi-talented Charles Dance. Given the barest outline of a quiet little idea of a 'fairy tale', LADIES IN LAVENDER becomes an unfolding meditation of quiet lives altered by an incident that awakens sleeping needs and emotions.

    Ursula (Judi Dench) and Janet (Maggie Smith) are elderly sisters living a quiet life of gardening, strolling the cliffs and beach of Cornwall, knitting, and reading. Their bumpy housekeeper Dorcas (Miriam Margolyes) cooks, cleans, shops, and chatters in a wonderful Cornish brogue, allowing the sisters to live an otherwise isolated life - isolated from history, personal emotions, and vulnerabilities. After a storm Ursula spies a figure on the beach below their home and the two descend to find an unconscious handsome young man whom they rescue, house, nurture, mend a broken ankle and ultimately become doting adorers. The young man Andrea (Daniel Brühl) finally awakens, speaks no English as he is Polish, and his charming ways attract inner emotions in both sisters. Janet studies some German and is able to speak with Andreas, while Ursula pastes English words on items in his room to teach him English. He mends and it is discovered that he is a concert violinist who was shipwrecked while striving to go to America. A Russian visitor to the town, Olga (Natascha McElhone), the requisite 'evil witch' for a fairy tale, hears Andreas play, informs him she has a cousin who is a famous violinist, and attracts him away from Cornwall to London where he ultimately gives his own concert.

    Those are the bare facts of the film's story. The magic lies not in the story itself but in the submerged feelings of the two sisters. Ursula, having never been in love in her youth, falls in love with Andrea, fully aware that there is no possibility of consummation. She feels long desired emotional attachment to the lad and the stirring in her breast is overwhelming to her. Janet, who once loved but lost that love to death, likewise falls for Andrea. It is this sibling rivalry over the passion for Andrea that provides some of the most touching and understated brilliant acting moments ever recorded on film. There is a scene where, resting from a stroll on the cliffs, Andrea rests with his head on Ursula's lap, perhaps the first physical contact with a man she has ever known, and the gentility of the slow and reticent placement of her hand on Andrea's resting head is a crystal of acting magic. How the sisters cope with this time with Andrea and his eventual leaving for his career is the climax of the film. And touching and understated it is.

    Judi Dench and Maggie Smith give pitch perfect characterizations, creating two lovely beings we will never forget. Likewise Daniel Brühl is superb in a role far different from his usual German repertoire (Goodbye Lenin!, The Edukators, Love in Thoughts) and manages to create the illusion that he is actually playing the violin (while the true artist is Joshua Bell in some stunning performances). The atmosphere of Cornwall is magically captured by Dance and his cinematographer Peter Biziou with assistance from Ed Rutherford. Nigel Hess has written a musical score, incorporating well-known classical violin works as well as his own hauntingly beautiful music that adds immeasurably to the film's success.

    LADIES IN LAVENDER is not a major blockbuster of a success nor does it try to be. It is simply a exquisitely crafted and acted fairy tale that gently reminds us that age does not prevent the heart from responding to that most beautiful of emotions, Love. Highly recommended. Grady Harp
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This was a very beautiful movie! I liked the setting in the Cornish fishing village, and they had also managed to get the feeling of the times (1930:s) just right. And all the actors were just excellent! It was also very sad, with the old spinster's hopelessly impossible unrequited passion for the young man... Who has not nursed a secret passion, and saved little mementos of the loved one, at one time or another in our lives..? In fact, I blushed in front of the screen a couple of times, as the old woman's behaviour made me remember embarrassing things I have done myself...

    Although I think the story would have been still more effective, if the woman had been a little younger. Maybe in her 40:s or 50:s instead of her 70:s. It would have been easier to relate to it then, and feel sorry for her... That is: I _did_ feel sorry for her now as well. It wrung my heart when the young man left with a beautiful woman of his own age - something that _had_ to happen before or later. But an age difference of about 50 years is simply indecent - insane.

    Or, alternatively, if her love for him had not been sexual at all, but only long repressed denied motherly feelings - as she had never had any children either, as well as no husband... That would have been nicer, I think.
  • Yes, that's what the title really means. It's nothing to do with what they wear, in spite of the movie posters. It harks back to the days when people used to lay away linen or other fabrics in lavender to prevent moths and mildew. So what this film was saying was - these ladies have been in storage a while, forgotten - and only when the young Polish guy comes into their lives do they flicker back to life.

    The usual superb performances from Judi and Maggie, what makes them so good, in Judi Dench's case particularly, is that you can *see* what they are thinking before they even speak.

    Superb fingering on the violin from an actor who, prior to this movie, had never touched one - you'd swear he was really playing.

    The movie was particularly poignant for me as I lived for many years in Cornwall and recognised a lot of the scenery. I can, incidentally, assure the critic who claimed a "mistake" by saying Starry-gazey pie is confined to Moushole, that this he/she totally wrong.

    It may have been originally a Mousehole speciality, but like Yorkshire pudding, has long since spread to other areas.

    Ladies in Lavender is one of those British films which will become a classic for its gentle theme, fantastic setting (inside and out) superb lighting and sound - and a good, strong story line.
  • Two elderly sisters take in a young Polish man who washes up on their beach.

    You can search this film in an attempt to identify an obscure filming style, go on and on about the two ladies who star in this work, or preen and posture over the quality performance of Daniel Brühl...or you can merely enjoy this work for what it is: A beautiful drama; one fraught with intrigues.

    This is very well written, and highly enjoyable, though it is not anything I would watch again out of choice, the first viewing was quite good. A second viewing, however, is not warranted.

    It rates a 6.9/10 from...

    the Fiend :.
  • caryra200319 September 2007
    For some reason, I dvr'd this movie the other day, because I love the Dames Maggie Smith and Judi Dench. I didn't watch it until last night. I started at 1am and watched the whole thing, even though I was exhausted. I am an old romantic.

    At the beginning, my friend and I just couldn't figure out what was wrong with Ursula and we figured out she was falling in love with the boy. Wow! It was so obvious after a while, and I reminisced about the time I fell in love with someone so much younger than me. It was a treat to see Maggie Smith, trying to protect and comfort her sister in her obvious agony of the just impossible love she was feeling for the boy. How sad.

    The end was a poignant and subtle end to a fabulous SHORT story. I actually thought they were in the islands off the southern coast.. I believe they are Jersey.. (like "The Others", and didn't realize it was pre-WWII, hence the hint at all of the Britons suspicions of Germans at the time.

    What a fabulous story. I absolutely loved it!.
  • Two elderly sisters (Maggie Smith and Judi Dench) live along the Cornish coast in England. One evening a violent storm erupts and the next morning a young man has washed ashore on the beach. The sisters manage to get him to their cottage and when he awakens it slowly becomes apparent that the guy is Polish. Now here's where it gets a little odd. Instead of just nursing him back to health and sending him on his way, the women hold on to Andrea (Daniel Brühl). Essentially, instead of adopting a new dog or cat, the pair adopt a young man! What is to become of this? And, who exactly is he and how did he get to Cornwall?

    So is this film any good? Yes...which isn't surprising considering it stars Dench and Smith--two amazing actresses. Likewise, the music (which makes up a great deal of the film) is lovely. In fact, I have no real complaints and the film is original. Worth seeing.
  • When one sees that both Maggie Smith and Judi Dench are in a movie, you almost automatically expect a very good film with brilliant acting. Well, we got the latter in "Ladies in Lavender", but it was just an average show with some excellent scenery and good music. There is no doubt that the two stars are superb actors who play their parts extremely well, but are not greatly pushed dramatically as they have been in many other films. Actually, to my mind, the actress playing the maid/housekeeper, Dorcas stole the scenes in which she appeared, and a special comment for Daniel Bruhl who played his part as the young man stirring many forgotten passions in two older ladies. It is worth seeing, but certainly not a memorable experience.
  • Who but Dames Judi Dench and Maggie Smith could play elderly sisters who don't particularly agree too much with each other's conventions utlizing such subtle acting talents? The script is terrific with lines thatare worthy of both great British stage and screen actors. Supporting characters present fine performances as well.

    It's terrific to have such a quality drama that is true to the real lives of senior women who live in another culture outside of my own in the US. Forget all of the nonsensical bleeping of scripts loaded with cursing (even though I am no prude!). Such scripts lack the integrity of presentation of a superior English lexicon. Forget the loud, fast paced action that appeals to more violence-craving audiences than me. Forget wacky comics who'd use all sorts of gimmicks and graphics to create anything but a character close to any culture's true life.

    Have a good look at the very strengths that abound in the whole of this film. The story plot line is a excellent one, I assure you. It goes like this: The ladies in lavender find a body of a young man barely still alive on the rocky, rough surf, beach in front of their old home. They take him in and nurse him to health. He turns out to be an extraordinarily gifted individual. When it is discovered that he is, the ladies have to face a harsh reality in order for him to realize his potential.

    It is comparable to "Tea with Mussolini" in both quality of script, story, and especially cast. How it slipped under popularity radar when "Tea . . ." didn't, is a mystery. This is a film that needs to be viewed by any age group of people. There's nothing about it a child couldn't understand and plenty about it that senior people would relate to, as well. "Whales of August" with Bette Davis and Lillian Gish is a superior treasure.
  • A true labour of love for writer/director Charles Dance, LADIES IN LAVENDER is a low key historical romance that explores an unusual love triangle that takes in pre-WW2 Cornwall. It's one of those films that's all about feelings and subtlety, so although there's virtually nothing in the way of on-screen action, it gets across a mood and feeling to be sufficiently watchable.

    A couple of lonely spinsters have their lives put into disarray when a young German is washed up on their beach, badly injured. He recuperates at their home, where one of them soon falls in love with him and convinces the other that he's Polish rather than German. Meanwhile, the arrival of a Russian girl in the village spells further trouble...

    The first half of this film brings to light a kind of wistful, nostalgic atmosphere for forgotten times when things were simpler. Judi Dench and Maggie Smith play to type, but both are good when they get to the heart and humanise their characters in later scenes. Dance's hands-off direction allows the story to play itself out at a leisurely pace, and I admit that I was gently enthralled. Daniel Bruhl (INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS) is a nice choice to play the German character. Later, attempts at intrigue with the Natasha McElhone character - as pretty as she is - don't really go anywhere and the plot falters a little. Still, the music scenes are delightful and at least the story never betrays itself, even if the ending is rather slight.
  • Having seen a preview screening of this film last night, I have to say that it's not one that I would probably have picked to see normally. However, I was pleasantly surprised to find that this was a reasonably enjoyable romp. The acting by the two Dames (Maggie Smith and Judi Dench) was superb as always and whilst I might not buy the film once it comes out on DVD I'm sorely tempted to pick up the soundtrack.

    Whilst it is not intended to be a comedy, there were a number of comedic moments in the film which did help to lighten the mood a little. I think the only thing that let it down in my eyes was that parts of it felt a little slow, especially at the beginning.

    To summarise, if you enjoyed Iris you'll like this. If you're over 50 you'll like this. If you're anyone else you'll tolerate it but not necessarily enjoy it. I give it 7/10
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Who could pass up the opportunity to see Judy Dench and Maggie Smith working together? Not me! They get lots of screen time, and they don't disappoint. They provide low key performances that, nevertheless, carry plenty of tension. This is a character story, an evocation of people, time, and place, like so many wonderful small English films.

    Some of the editing bothered me. I also wondered about the lack of development given the mysterious character who suddenly enters their lives -- it is a glaring omission, given the attention lavished on the ladies. Here lies what was, for me, the central disappointment in the film. Two German speaking young adults have left their countries and come to Cornwall. Who are they really? Why have they left? What is their business in Cornwall? Intriguing possibilities and complications abound, given the epoch and location of the film. Some of them get mentioned, but they go unexplored. As a result, the film shrinks back from potentially interesting dramatic conflicts. It stays sweet and predictable. It is an enjoyable film, but less than it could have been.
  • The film, directed by Charles Dance, is the epitome of good, low budget, British cinema. Two major actresses, Judy dench and Maggie Smith underplay their parts very well. Maggie Smith has that special gift of "scene stealing". The locations were superb and true to life as I remember that era well. The casting director gathered a supporting cast who added to the enjoyment of the film. My only complaint was that the editing for the first 30mins of the film lacked sympathy with the plot and, at times, very abrupt. The question of how the boy got into the water is never explained but it didn't matter because the script was more of a story without a beginning and without end. A great film, I loved it!
  • Cosy but unadventurous portrayal of rustic Cornwall just before WWII. Maggie Smith and Judi Dench play two delightful elderly buddies who discover a foreigner washed up on the beach. As they nurse him back to health their youthful jealousies and fantasies are stirred, but the stranger holds a secret in him that can unite the village and bring out the best in all of them. Daniel Bruehl and Natascha McElhone (as the stunning artist who reaches out to him) play their roles well and also provide delightful eye-candy in what is a beautifully observed, if rather leisurely, piece of cinema. The denouement makes the long wait more worth while, but this is a Sunday afternoon movie rather than an exciting night out.
  • I had read mixed reviews on this and am delighted to report that I was captivated completely by the plot, the cinematography and the two delightful actors (and Dames), Judi Dench and Maggie Smith. Not to mention the music played by Joshua Bell, the young supporting actors, Daniel Bruhl and Natascha McElhone and the curmudgeonly Miriam Margolyes as Dorcas the daily.

    Highly evocative of the era, around 1938-1939 when Germany is rising and the memories of WW1 are still strong. Janet, one of the sisters, played by Maggie, is a widow from that war and lives with her sister Ursula, a spinster, played by Judi.

    The story is delicate and mindful of others - Whales of August, Tea with Mussolini, but it has its own strength - the unrequited love that Ursula feels for the young man that the sisters rescue from the shore.

    Charles Dance does a superb job both with the writing and the directing of such a flimsy tale. One is taken right in to the era, the harvest, the clothes, the village dance, the fisherman with their catches of the day on the shore. Gorgeous landscapes and gardens. A slice of life beautifully done. 8 out of 10.
  • Two sisters of independent means living a life of tranquility. A lovely country garden cottage, an idyllic Cornish village with inoffensive locals. A portly housekeeper prepared to empty the jerry as well as going to the fish market and conducting other activities unsuited to the sensitivities of her prim employers.

    If you are a sucker for the maudlin, as I am, you will love this. The story is irrelevant. The acting superb. Dench and Smith together are a joy.

    Dance clearly fancies himself as an art house type and attempts to consolidate himself as such. Unfortunately I couldn't help thinking he cashes in on the "Billy Elliot"/"Brassed Off" type of musical climax a little too crudely for jerking the tears at the end.
  • Chances are Ladies in Lavender will remind you of that sweetly played Michael Radford film from the mid-90s entitled The Postman; later known only as "Il Postino", in its original language, at the expense of a later Kevin Costner film of the same name. Like Il Postino, Ladies in Lavender is a period piece, set around about the same time as Radford's film, which zeroes in on a sleepy coastal town and a specific inhabitant whose life has been somewhat bereft of incident, let alone incident with the opposite sex, and often, we feel, sheltered. Amidst the town's more animated activity, that being limited to fishing and only fishing, a younger member of the other gender crash lands into the laps of our lead; their beauty prominent, their allusive qualities more than evident and their presence later shattering. As either films progress, we will come to watch this lead go on to both interact as well as advance the nature of their feelings for the previously exterior individual; thus leading to all sorts of complications to do with lust and anger which lead to overwhelming residing sentiments.

    The film follows that of Judi Dench's Ursula, an elderly woman living in a Cornish town with her sister Janet – played by the seemingly ever-consummate Maggie Smith. This pairing live in the sort of place in which local residents are able to recall what people looked like nigh-on forty years ago, the sense of those born in the area not necessarily going anywhere during their lives that is particularly far away from the area, prominent. We open on them with this quaint, blissful sentiment to proceedings; the duo messing about on a beach during a clear summer evening establishing real degrees of closeness and a sense of very little strife, or indeed, issue, currently between them - even at this late stage in either of their lives. Whilst on the beach, Janet appears willing to have a brief paddle in the lapping sea; Ursula's natural reaction to dismiss such an idea, through being afraid of it or whatever, sees her hold back as the sibling makes the proverbial step forward to get involved, thus an instance is an early highlighting of either women's nature and the dynamic of their relationship therein.

    Further sentiments of these sisters being as close as they are reside when we realise they share a bedroom housing two single beds, in spite of the fact the house is clearly big enough for the pair of them. Janet's side-table houses a photograph of a younger man dressed as a soldier, and is most probably her husband; then we observe that Ursula's side-table is vacant of such things, inferring a lack of prior masculine presence in her life. As a pairing, we observe Janet dismissing a "populist" radio show Ursula enjoys listening to; Janet spends the free time they have reading, whereas Ursula can only knit and when it comes to starting up their motor-vehicle to go out, Janet must again drive proceedings as she cranks it up and gets it going before taking them both out. Culturally, and in terms of exposure to life and whatnot, Janet appears indelibly more advanced than her sister; brief establishments that go a long way to tee up what will be Ursula's tale of having to come to terms with certain feelings and drive a strand of her own that will go against this established patriarchy.

    Where we come to sense few ever get out, and that sense of the whole place being entirely tied in to one another in that community driven way some places are, we sense the film's catalyst arriving in the form of a young man washed up on the nearby shore through Daniel Brühl's Andrea could be quite the occasion. Upon first seeing him, and the consequent interactions thereafter, Janet's busy physical demeanour as someone trying to aid and take care of him is in stark contrast to Ursula's stilted, far more stunned complexion; she reacts as if not having seen one of his kind in her entire life, even doing so a fair time after the initial shock of finding someone with the potentially to be seriously injured or even dead has evaporate. The night before Andrea's inglorious arrival, they turn off their radio with the announcer on the brink of speaking of a severe storm due to hit the area – what they end up with is a more burning, more physical incarnation of this sort, particularly when Natascha McElhone manoeuvres into proceedings. McElhone plays a Russian love rival named Olga whom turns up and reveals herself to paint rather than merely knit; someone whom we enjoy observing at home, barefoot, and blowing smoke into the air from her cigarette as she sports a loose gown and sits comfortably on a chair in an extravagant looking house.

    The film gently constructs Ursula's gradual coming to feel for this young man, eventually revealed to be a Polish violinist. The film tiptoes between a fine line separating it from warm hearted drama and out and out tragedy; we really enjoy Dench's acting - her frail and fragile performance, as she plays this vulnerable person exposed to elements she struggles to comprehend, a wondrous performance off the back of playing that of domineering, grizzled women evident in the likes of Die Another Day and The Chronicles of Riddick: Dench flicks from one to the other remarkably. Director Charles Dance, his first and so far his only venture into directing, does a more than ample job in depicting these events and these characters; his film amongst some of the better film-making debuts from the first half of last decade, and worthy of utterance in the same breath as Romanek's One Hour Photo or Richard Kelly's Donnie Darko, in what is a fascinating drama.
  • Interesting but flawed character study of 2 elderly sisters living in a British seacoast resort town who find a Polish young man who has apparently been shipwrecked.

    With a broken ankle, the lad seems to make a rapid movie recovery. It turns out that he is a virtuoso when it comes to playing the violin.

    Coincidentally, a visiting neighbor, who speaks German, arouses suspicion by speaking the latter language to him. She wants him to meet her well known musical brother and the doctor, David Warner, notifies the constable, that he suspects some espionage is going on. This film takes place in the late 1930s.

    The problem with the film is that the sisters, played nicely by Judi Dench and Maggie Smith, are not able to fully develop their characters. Both are aging in the film and without make-up, they are like a sight for sore eyes. In fact, Smith looks like a thin Michael Caine in drag. We learn that Janet (Smith) was married and a nurse. Her husband died in World War 1. Ursula (Dench) is a typical spinster who seems to fall for the young lad.

    The ending shows the difference in classes as well as the age aspects. While it is sad, it reminds us of the reality of life. The film is good but would have been outstanding with a stronger plot and character development.
  • Everyone, including my dog and 2 cats left the room, except me. I had to stop the movie and take a break. I am a movie finisher but I couldn't take it and fast forwarded it, stopping a couple times to catch up for about 30 seconds. I didn't miss much apparently. Worst of all it had a terrible ending. Good acting but storyline / plot, writing etc was really a let down. Very thankful I live in the digital age in order to utilize streaming services and remote controls. I feel somewhat guilty giving this a bad review considering the level of talent in this film 😐 Thank you
An error has occured. Please try again.