User Reviews (122)

Add a Review

  • gbill-748777 March 2022
    In a nutshell, one summer two young British women from different classes meet and befriend one another, and eventually their relationship gets romantic. That may not sound terribly original, but the way it's executed here by director Pawel Pawlikowski is lovely, and this film has a lot going for it. It's also not as predictable as it may seem.

    Natalie Press and Emily Blunt are both brilliant in the lead roles, and easily make this film worth seeing. The moments when Press imitates the devil and when she shows Blunt how a man shags her are priceless. So is seeing Blunt playing the cello and their dancing scene to Goldfrapp's dreamy 'Lovely Head.' The pair have a physical relationship but I liked how restrained Pawlikowski was in showing this. There are wonderful scenes of them disappearing into the flowers and sitting in front of the firelight in silhouette, but what they say and do never feels cliché.

    Meanwhile, the patriarchy is on display via the hypocritical brother who has "found God," the backstory of the father who's abandoned the family, and the guy who cheats on his wife with a young woman and then ruthlessly discards her. The film is saying something about men and women here, but it's also saying something about class. I won't spoil it, but the ending is fantastic. At 86 minutes long, it was the perfect length too.
  • First of all, the young leads Nathalie Press and Emily Blunt acted superbly; these newcomers are really stunning for the way they movingly played this character drama, showing every sort of emotion a human being may feel. "My summer of love" is not only a lesbian love affair between two needy and sexy teens, set in a beautiful countryside, but it's also a thoughtful portrayal of friendship, deception and obsession. In spite of a story starting as an erotic drama it finally turns into a suspenseful and powerful situation. Last but not least Paddy Considine is also up to the film brightness, rendering a man whose redemption seems to slowly fade.
  • paul2001sw-110 November 2004
    Pavel Pavlikovski directed the bleak, austere 'Last Resort', and was sacked from 'Sylvia' on grounds of having an insufficiently commercial sensitivity.

    Now he had made 'My Summer of Love', a nicely observed tale of a teenage lesbian romance. As in 'Last Resort', Russian-born Pavlikovski paints an enticingly skewed picture of Britain that rings true in spite of its aberrence; and gets good performances out of his cast, especially Paddy Considine as the brother of one of the girls, who could certainly have used more screen-time, though his co-stars Nathalie Press and Emily Blunt are also good. The film steers clear of cliché, and has some dryly funny dialogue, but what it lacks is a sense of time as a continuum: it feels like a semi-random sampling of its characters' lives, and although there is a clear plot it's hidden in the background, apparent only later. In some ways, this is also true to life, but it also means that the film remains low-key right up to the moment of its suddenly dramatic conclusion. Pavlikovski also seems surprisingly keen on static location shots (before we see the characters inside of a house, we always see the house from outside),

    which jars slightly given the film's general artistic merits. Distinctive, and well-worth watching, 'My Summer of Love' isn't quite a great film; but it is an interesting effort from a director committed to representing life in the ways that Hollywood never does.
  • I really enjoyed this film. I especially liked the langour of its pacing (helped by a wonderful soundtrack), certainly at the start where we simply observe the girls hanging out together drinking copious amounts of red wine and smoking constantly. Something about the timelessness, the heaviness of the heat, the bird song and buzzing insects caught perfectly that summer after 'A' levels where there is nothing to do but simply live, spend time with friends, and fantasies can take on a larger and more defined shape than realities. The 'lesbian' angle was handled deftly - though as another user commented, it would be good to see a film which manages to trace the intensity of female adolescent friendships without having them be sexual in nature - but this is a very special time, and the film caught that beautifully. The poignancy of Mona's existence was undersold as well, which gave it a greater power - she is the one who has truly suffered loss, whereas Tamsin... well, you have to make up your own mind about that. A minor film, but hits its notes perfectly.
  • Beautifully acted and gorgeously filmed, this movie had all the makings of a great combination coming-of-age story slash love story, but it encountered the same problem so many other almost-great movies (Rain Man, anyone?) have: it has no ending...it just...stops. Naturally the climax is the most difficult story element to envision and pull off, but come on, you gotta put in a little more effort than this. The film's third act contains some delightful twists, which seem to set the stage for a powerful ending, but it seems like the filmmakers simply ran out of ideas, or couldn't agree on one. Still worth your time, for the fantastic performances of Emily Blunt (remember that name!!) and the always reliable Paddy Considine, not to mention the lead (I forgot her name), but it just leaves such a bad taste in your mouth when a movie comes this close to being great.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    "My Summer of Love" tells the story of a young girl with a newly-christian brother, who meets a strange rich girl one day and begins to fall in love with her. As they step over their former boundaries together, a bond begins to form that gets tested when some lies begin to come clearer.

    This is a typical coming-of-age drama, centered around some very different girls with not so different problems. At some points it tried a bit too hard to add drama and meaning but overall it has its moments. In the end it maybe is not so much a story of love than it is a story of power and abuse. Personally, I would have wished for some more powerful ups and downs, but nonetheless you can read a lot into it.

    All in all there are better films in this genre but there are also definitely worse. If you like more thoughtful films that don't necessarily involve a lot of action, this one could be just right for you.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I just saw this movie today and I must say it is quite affecting, although the ending is sort of like an alarm clock jolting you awake from a nice dream. The most obvious antecedent for this movie I can think of is Peter Jackson's Heavenly Creatures. Both involve a violently consuming relationship between two beautiful young girls. The movie is, to me sort of like a confrontation of opposites, there's the rich, jaded girl (Tasmin) and the naive, innocent one (Mona). Tasmin represents the experienced girl who sees life as a canvas to act out her fantasies in, while Mona seems to live life more directly and literally. This creates the tension between the two and leads to the dramatic ending, which seems somewhat abrupt considering the "magical realism" of the rest of the movie. I highly recommend this movie, it is one that immerses you completely if you allow it to. The acting is exceptional, especially the leads, so natural that it doesn't seem like acting at all.
  • I wanted to see this movie for a long time. I recently finally got the chance to see it and although it was a good movie, it was not the must-see I heard it was and I expected it to be. This movie was praised at all kinds of festivals and website's that are respectable and thrust worthy when it comes to the 'better smaller'-, mainly European movies. Needless to say that my expectations were high, maybe a bit too high. "My Summer of Love" feels like a fabricated movie that is all too aware of its own style, which makes the movie feel forced and too artificially made at certain moments.

    The story and premise are good enough. The story feels very pure and the two main characters are good enough to carry the entire movie on their own, which they also get to do. I don't know, for some reason movies with a 'lesbian' love-story always feel so much purer and perhaps sweeter than any other love-stories.

    So it's not really the story that is the problem but it really is the way it is told. "My Summer of Love" is directed by a Polish director and made by a mostly English crew. It has European style written all over it, especially when it comes down to its cinematography (shakycam, sudden zooms). The cinematography all feels too forced and planned. It's not pure enough and it's all very calculated. The cinematography of the nature and the more 'quiet' sequences are good and the capture a nice mood but for 70% of the movie the cinematography simply feels too fabricated. The way of cinematography doesn't feel necessary and it doesn't add enough to the movie. It feels like its only used to make this movie distinct itself from the more 'Hollywood' way of film-making. At times it feels like they wanted every sequence to be pure poetry.

    The movie also feels incomplete. All of the sequences are too short and they end abruptly. The movie has some interesting plot-lines in it but the sequences are handled in are too short to make a lasting impression. I wanted to see and learn more about certain plot-lines and characters but the sequences were over before I fully realized what happened and what was going on with the characters. This is also the reason why this movie only is 86 minutes short. The movie doesn't cover enough of the story and because of that the movie feels incomplete and perhaps at times makes a dull and a too simple impression. Because it's all 'too short', the movie never really knew how to capture and set the right mood, of the boring country life in a small English town. It was not like I didn't understood or 'got' this movie, it was just that I wasn't grabbed by it all and it didn't made a lasting impression on me.

    The ending also didn't really came as a surprise. The movie constantly gave me the feeling that something wasn't 'right', so I expected a twist at the ending, which also came. So even though the ending itself wasn't predictable, the build up to it still was.

    The acting is quite good and pure. Nathalie Press and Emily Blunt are good enough as the two young leading ladies but what will they be doing in 10 years from now? Probably not acting. They are pure but they aren't really actresses. But for this movie that's OK really. I mean that probably also was the reason why they were cast in the first place.

    I know I'm probably sounding too negative and harsh but that simply is because the movie just wasn't as good as I heard it was and I expected it to be. The movie is still good and pure enough to please the fans of 'European' cinema but too many moments in the movie feel too fabricated. I probably make the movie sound worser than it is, so please if you're into this sort of movies, watch this one as well. It's a movie worth seeing that still has plenty to offer its viewers.

    It's a good movie but not the best example of recent good and pure European film-making.

    7/10

    http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/
  • TVGoHome12324 January 2006
    In this day and age it would appear that films that are British made now need a certain Hollywood endorsement or require to be set in chic surroundings in order for it to be considered a triumph. One wet, dreary Glasgow's summer night I stumbled upon this in the video shop and having heard much about I chanced my luck and got it out. On previous occasions I had the opportunity but the subject matter I had found to be off putting. This film is an art-house masterpiece displaying an unusual relationship between a working class girl living in a dull rural town and an upper class private school girl. The film is capturing as you watch their relationship develop towards an ending which is perfectly summed up as bitter sweet. The lead performances are excellent and Paddy Considine is outstanding as the reformed alcoholic turned Christian. This film deserves to be seen by many and warrants much of the praise it gained. Also it gave new hope to many who felt that Britain's days as a great country to make films were over. Rating: Simply excellent
  • Warning: Spoilers
    The poor are honest, and the rich are careless. Yes, I can go out of my way to say that the first half of the movie has barely any character development, but the movie surely has a meaning to it.

    I'll tell you right now if you are looking for a fast-paced movie, that has interesting characters, that's not there. It's a slow, "real-life" movie, about usage. If you just think from the regular perspective, hey it's just these two women messing around sure, then the movie is barely a 3.

    If we look at the full picture, that one of the women truly is in love and wants somebody to be there for her, to truly accept her for who she is, and on the other side you got this other one, that manages to ruin both her brother and her life.

    You see during the movie, she's seductive toward her brother, this was all a game in her eyes. While you got another character that truly wants love and acceptance, as she has nobody except her brother that has a past criminal past, that's trying to be a better human being, by being religious.

    The seductress manages to completely ruin his life, by wanting to kiss him, and then because he went into a complete tantrum with his sister, he goes insane at people that he believes in, so he is in complete pieces, and then the sister finds out the truth, which is just heartbreaking.

    Yes, I can recommend this movie, ONLY if you know what you are getting into. You can NOT expect a lot of occurrences, or a lot of character depth. Just think of it as a real-life scenario, of how the rich will squash the poor.

    Most movies try to have a slow plot, but the ending is an explosion fail, this one manages to stand on its feet because first, it has a pretty good point, and second of all, you can truly feel bad for the poor chick.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    How can such an amateurish, plot less movie with poor acting even receive such a high rating? I just don't get it. First of all there is zero chemistry between the two main characters. At least a minimum of that would be fair to expect now that they are supposed to not just become friends - despite of two totally different personalities - but a romantic couple. Like in the movie Adele there is absolutely no explanation as to how they become attracted to each other - they are just suddenly making love, from one frame to the next. The whole build-up is skipped. And apart from that there are just way too many plot holes and unrealistic scenes. E.g. Mona goes on a trip with her new friend without knowing where they are going - yet she did bring a bikini for their swim! How was that possible? Is she a fortune-teller? Also her friend brought a bikini - even though it seems unplanned that they went for that swim. As there were nobody else around, and they did not plan the swim - they would have done it in the nude, and voila - there you would have the missing build-up. Instead we get a quick, fully-bikini-clothed kiss. That's all. Heterosexual girls also kiss, thus this is nowhere near any lesbian approach. And what made her brother turn Christian? Nobody knows. Yes, he explains how he saw the light etc. but the individual, life-turning event that triggered his sudden clergy is just added to the way too many unanswered questions. The whole movie seems plot less, just moving from one pathetic, boring, silly, unrealistic scene to the next. The shortfalls are so many and so obvious that the unusually high rating of this movie - even from critics - is just incredible.
  • My Summer of Love is a brave, sincere film, which gives us, cinema-lovers, the hope that cinema is not dead and is not only a money-making entertainment machine whatever the cost. It looks hard into life of today, but this look is not to frighten, to scare, to scandalize - I'd call it poetic realism, in the best traditions of cinema, when its great masters were not afraid to experiment, but only strive for true presentation of their idea and of their characters. It is also a film about love, because it is done with so much love for people who follow their heart, and who value their openness and freedom of expressing themselves. Highly artistic work of it's author Pavel Pavlikovski, and also of actress Natalie Press, whom I was happy to see at the Sofia Film Fest, at the Bulgarian premiere of the film on 11 March 05.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    There is a type of intense emotion that only a lesbian romance may attain, and you will experience it through the character development in and at the end of My Summer of Love, a straightforward and a little old-fashioned lesbian film. As suffocated from her religious brother and tired with her married male lover, Mona (Nathalie Press) falls for a little older, sophisticated, and intelligent Tamsin (Emily Blunt). Their mutual feeling is slowly grown and then is crystallized into a touching scene: their silhouettes' confessing love for each other before a fire. At the end, after Mona learns that Tamsin is different from what she has presented and just wanted to have a summer fling with Mona, Mona's feeling explodes and she attempts drowning Tasmin, before the very last picture of Mona walking alone, which is reminiscent of the last scene of The 400 Blows.
  • misty_7730 August 2005
    Warning: Spoilers
    I was surprised to see how well received this film is in other IMDb posts. I was quite disappointed by it.

    The camera work, whilst adding to the 'artistic' feel of the movie, annoyed me. As did one of the main characters - Mona - whose constant smoking, irritating voice, and general air of unkemptness was a major frustration. To me the two girls just seemed so different that a friendship, little own a brief love affair, seemed difficult to swallow. The feeling of inevitability one gets that Mona is going to be poorly treated by Tamsin made the whole experience very painful to watch.

    Which is not to say the movie isn't well acted. Outstanding performances from the three leads make it film worth watching. But the script and cinematography let it down.
  • This is a charming film. A pretty simple story of two slightly dysfunctional girls who meet by chance and become drawn to each other, who fall in love through the summer vacation, who have fun together and then, inevitably, part, is brought totally to life by the charismatic performances of the two young leads. The film looks gorgeous, shot in the beautiful Yorkshire moors, and the direction is sharp. This film is a near perfect rendition of an oft told tale of growing pains and confused adolescent feelings and is so delightfully rendered as to make any further comment superfluous. To see it is to love it! Go see.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    In case you haven't yet seen this film you might want to know that this isn't exactly the type of summer romance that "The Notebook" is but that's okay because this is a film that's more about finding the truth than finding a soul mate. Story takes place in a small town in West Yorkshire where we see teenage Mona (Nathalie Press) who rides around town on her moped and is secretly dating a married man but what she really wants is to get out of her community and live somewhere more exciting. Her brother Phil (Paddy Considine) has a dark past and has been in jail but now he has found Jesus and the pub that he and Mona have inherited from their parents is now being used for the religious group that he prays with.

    *****SPOILER ALERT***** One day Mona meets Tamsin (Emily Blunt) who is a rich girl home from school and staying with her parents but they both leave on trips leaving Mona alone. Mona and Tamsin are both bored in the town and naturally start spending every moment together until they end up in a sexual relationship and declaring their love for one another. Tamsin tells her about the death of her sister from bulimia and how she's never really gotten over it and she seems curious about Mona's relationship with her brother. The two of them talk about leaving and going to a big city to live together but Phil tells her to stay away from Tamsin and locks her in her bedroom which tests his faith especially the way she mocks his new found religious ways. After Mona is allowed to leave she finds out a very cruel secret about Tamsin and her sister that ruins every plan she had about getting away not only from the town but from Phil as well.

    This is only the second feature film from director and writer Paul Pavlikovsky and while this effort is a bit rough around the edges (especially the cinematography) the film benefits from a script that allows the characters to show real human flaws. Although the film is extremely low budget the actors are more than up to task and lately Considine has been giving consistently good and interesting performances. Blunt with her nude scenes exudes an exciting sexuality that should insure other interesting roles coming her way but the film seemingly belongs to Press who's appearance reminds me of both Toni Collette and Bryce Howard. Press demonstrates that she's more than capable of playing lead roles in films and her performance here is solid as she shows both strength and vulnerability. For me the most interesting thing in the story comes when Phil eventually rejects religion and kicks everyone out and I think the reason for this comes when he figures out that religion has changed him to the point that it ruins his relationship with his sister Mona. My feeling is that his actions earlier in the film were being done to try and gain his sisters acceptance and when this fails he has no other recourse but to revert back to his old self. Pavlikovsky's film doesn't really have any moral messages to it but it does exceed at being a very good character study and all three of these actors excel splendidly in their roles.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Essentially, I see this as a film that explores the failure of patriarchy,in particular, its subsequent affect on the institution of family. In addition, it intelligently demonstrates an understanding of Christianity's contradictions and in doing so provides some evidence of its instability. In addition, the film is fairly successful in providing a brief insight into the classically misinterpreted philosophical ideas of Frederich Nietzsche. There are several holes in the plot that I will not go into, however, I did see parallels between 'My Summer of Love' and 'Dead Mans Shoes'. For instance, the mise-en-scene, particularly the location are quite similar and is the general mood. The 'peeping Tom' style employed by Pavlikovsky is comparable to the way Meadows shot 'Dead Mans Shoes', even the 'twist' at the end of both films could be argued to be similar. But it works. You certainly feel 'uneasy' during the film. Paddy Considine, who stars in this film and co-wrote the script for 'Dead Mans Shoes', has clearly been influenced by Pavlikovsky's style, but I'm not complaining. Nonetheless, why they decided on the title 'My Summer of Love' I will never know.
  • I enjoyed this film as it asks questions about life, Society and Religion in an unconventional Way. Mona and Tam fall in love one summer.

    Press plays Mona, bored to tears with life in provincial Yorkshire, and especially bored with her brother Phil (Paddy Considine) who is a reformed violent criminal and born-again Christian now righteously pouring away the stocks of booze in the pub owned by their late parents, and re-purposing this place of sin as a prayer center. Then she meets Tamsin (Emily Blunt), a kindred spirit despite being outrageously posh, who's rusticated from her private girls' school, and whose neglectful parents let her have the run of their magnificent Tudor family home. Mona explains that her name is actually Lisa, but her habit of complaining got her the nickname "Moaner" Lisa, from her brother, back in the days when he had a sense of humor. Tamsin's enigmatic response is simply to drawl: "I've studied the original." But as I said you do not have to be Lesbian to enjoy this wonderful film. Many people go through life asking themselves who they are? Where do they live and what do they believe in.
  • For anyone conversant with the English class system and the clichés surrounding it, this movie unfolds with the inevitability of a train wreck, but you watch it anyway to see what the final smash up will be like. Here we have a bored, intelligent, manipulative rich girl and an angry, intelligent poor girl who is smart enough the see that her life is a dead end but has no idea how to escape from it. Guess which one takes the relationship seriously and gets hurt, and which one is simply using it for entertainment. Hint -- never expect anything good from a character in a movie, especially a teen-aged character, who quotes Nietzsche with approval. The end is inevitable, but there are some interesting surprises along the way, including one moment of genuinely suspenseful uncertainty, and the three principal actors inhabit the roles believably.

    --SPOILER

    One interesting twist is the movie's surprisingly sympathetic perspective on fundamentalist Christianity. For all the apparent disdain heaped upon the born again zeal of Mona's brother by both girls, we ultimately see that it has kept his self-loathing rage in check, and that he is a better person when he has faith than when he has been irresponsibly seduced into losing it.
  • jotix10025 June 2005
    Warning: Spoilers
    One of the things playing under the surface of "My Summer of Love" is the disparity in class and privilege between Mona and Tamsin. When we first meet them, Tamsin tells Mona she has been expelled from school. As a rich girl bored and with nothing to do, Tamsin accepts Mona as a pretty object, but we know from the beginning nothing is going to come about their love for one another. Rather, it appears that love is what Mona feels for the rich girl, not the other way around.

    Paul Pavlikowsky's take on the Helen Cross' novel makes for an interesting film that on the surface seems to be an idyllic love between two teen age girls, when in reality no one seems to see the cruelty that Tamsin exerts in the more naive Mona. Tamsin lies about a sister without no shame; that same sister appears at the last moment in the film to ask Mona to return what she perceives as a stolen blouse, humiliating Mona even more. After all, Tamsin is going back to yet another school for rich girls while Mona has to stay in the small village with a broken heart that will not heal. Tamsin, in retrospect is a cool and calculating young woman who has no scruples or much less feels remorse for leading Mona to believe they will stay together forever.

    The third main character of the story is the enigmatic Phil, Mona's brother. He does a complete change by joining an evangelical sect and he has left the pub go out of business. Phil is another troubled soul that has no problem at the end renouncing his ties to the religious group that has taken over his pub, and his life. While Phil seems to care for his sister Mona, he is a distant man, in spite of his newly found religiosity. Where he should have been kind and loving, he grows distant and into himself.

    The three main characters in "My Summer of Love" are well drawn. Natalie Press gives a fine account of Mona, the more naive of the two girls. She is an unsophisticated girl who has no social graces and is completely dazzled by the more savvy Tamsin. Emily Blunt, a beautiful young actress is perfect as Tamsin, a manipulator, who will have Mona believe that she truly cares for her, when in reality, she is only amusing herself while confined to the summer house in the country. Paddy Considine does a good job as the sullen Phil, the man who finds religion and then abandons it.

    The film, under the fine direction of Mr. Pavlikowsky needs the viewer's attention to see the nuances under the story unfolding in front us.
  • Pretty much everything has been said about this film from +ve and -ve points of view, except to comment on the incredibly accurate portrayal of the Christians in this film.

    The prayer meetings and the singing could have been lifted straight from many evangelical Anglican churches at the moment. I was so impressed that they had tried hard to get an accurate and balanced portrayal, walking a very difficult line letting the viewer bring their own opinions and interpretations of evangelical Christianity to the film. It makes a change for anyone to go to that much trouble to get it right. I would love to know who advised on these scenes!
  • karhukissa23 September 2006
    I translated this film for the Budapest GLBT cultural festival. So I expected something that would show lesbian love in a positive light. Instead, this was a rather depressing feature about a teenage friendship which turned into a love affair "by chance". Someone comparing it to Heavenly Creatures had a point. Lesbianism is presented here as an escape from the sordid reality of the girls' (especially Mona's) life.

    Not that we see much of these lives, though. This was my major problem with the film. It was based on a novel which was clearly autobiographical, and some points got lost on the way. What part did the zealot brother play in the story? And Tamsin's parents? What was the point in the religious procession, and why was it important to include? Where are Mona's parents? A lot of questions that aren't answered. The two actresses are really superb, but they seem to exist in a void, without an even slightly realistic environment. Maybe this is how the author felt at the time of this happening, but it doesn't make a film. At least not a good one.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Two adolescent girls from very different background meet up in the North English countryside. They both come from dysfunctional families – one, Mona, is cared for by her born-again brother who is busy turning their inherited tavern into a place of 'worship'. She has a motorbike without an engine that she bought for a tenner from some gypsies. The other girl, Tamsin, has come home from (or been temporarily expelled from) her public school and has come home for the summer to the family mansion and frequently-absentee parents. Somehow they each seem to provide the emotional jigsaw piece that the other lacks, and a tender love affair develops between them.

    My Summer of Love is a light-hearted mix of drama and comedy, and would probably stop at being pleasantly superficial were it not for the remarkable performances of the lead characters. Two relatively unknown actors have been coaxed by Director Paul Pavlikovsky to bring us performances that are so vibrant and unique that we remain glued to the screen throughout. At the film's world premiere at the Edinburgh International Film Festival, I asked Pavlikovsky and his leading ladies Natalie Press and Emily Blunt whether the screenplay was scripted or a combination of script and improvisation. They enthused about his 'mad' techniques and 'riffing' performances until 'little gems of dialogue' appeared and were worth keeping. Some dialogue is from their original script, but when I asked if that meant some was improvised he said that improvisation often results in clichés, which is the opposite of what they were trying to achieve. In the search for 'gems of dialogue' some of the scenes would be workshopped beforehand, but with a certain amount of leeway to see what worked when they were actually shot.

    (Spoilers): The ending of the film leaves quite a few questions, including ones about the nature of the girls' love for each other and how 'real' it was. In the post-premiere Q&A, Emily Blunt suggested that 'Tamsin is more emotive' in the way she expresses her love, whereas Mona has more of an earthy innocence. This idea that there can be many equally valid forms of true love is perhaps as intellectually challenging as the film gets, although we are left to feel, Blunt suggests, that both of the characters survive the experience and become strong. Nathalie Press revealed that an alternate (perhaps more crowd pleasing) ending had also been shot but discarded.
  • My Summer of Love, as the title implies, is about a romance during the summer holidays. Perhaps one of the draws of this movie in release now in Singapore, is indirectly from the popularity of The Devil Wears Prada, with Emily Blunt playing the role of an uncooperative, bullying colleague to Anne Hathaway's Andrea. Yet another GLBT movie to hit our shores (somehow I think lesbian love films make it here more frequently than gay ones?), this movie, based on a novel written by Helen Cross, and directed by Pawel Pawlikowski, has won the BAFTA award for Best British Film, amongst other movie awards.

    The protagonist is Mona (Nathalie Press), a young orphaned girl on the verge of losing her brother Phil (Paddy Considine) to his rediscovery of Christianity. They own a bar, but with his turn for the supposed better, he has converted their joint to a meeting place for his cell group of reborn Christians. Lonely, she chances upon Tamsin (Emily Blunt), a girl back from boarding school for the holidays, and the two soon strike up a fast friendship.

    It makes you wonder how one develops feelings for members of the same sex, or if such harbouring of feelings is innate in the first place. Mona becomes the surrogate sister of Tamsin, who is a typical poor pitiful rich girl looking for thrills, who had lost her own sister, and found a substitute in Mona. Coming from families who seemingly don't care for them, their hanging out together draws them closer to each other.

    Much of the movie shows this development of friendship into something more, of the forging of friendship amongst lonely people, and devotes much screen time to this. However, there is another side observation on a separate theme, and that's of religion. I found that this film bold in its depiction of the hypocrisy amongst men who assume they have godly powers over mere mortals, and how their bigoted views often seem misguided. It doesn't mince its message on speaking in tongues, or having the Lord speak through oneself in the judgement of others.

    Of course it's always tough being the good and holy person, given sinners are we all, but there are plenty of scenes in this movie that probably suggests that there is always a veil of hypocrisy surrounding those who use the name of the Lord in vain. Through Phil, we see how hard he tries to be accepted back to society, how hard he tries to imagine that he has changed for the better because of his devotion to religious cause, and how easy it is to fall back into the path which totally contradicts every well-meaning effort trying to change oneself.

    On a lighter note, there is a little hint of mystery that nags you throughout the film about possible deception. And with the twist revealed at the end, it somehow makes your blood boil a bit, never mind if you don't swing for the same side. Perhaps sometimes, it's always best to heed advice from blood which is always thicker than water, or stick to the notion that summer flings should always begin and end as the season comes and goes.
  • I guess I was under the impression that this would be a young love movie... I was extremely disappointed! This movie lacks so much!! MOST of all love... the actresses were immature and annoying! And to top it off, there was no chemistry between the two girls! It was like they were kissing because there was nothing else to do! And they were so shallow...they didn't know each other! A little depth never hurt anyone! I've seen many good lesbian flicks that I would love to enjoy over and over again...this movie however, I would LOVE to forget! On a better note, the movie did have some good scenery! The landscape was beautiful! And I could laugh over some parts, because they were so stupid, and I could not believe they put them in the movie! If you're looking for a movie that gives you warm fuzzy feelings or is excitingly interesting ....this is not it! Move on!
An error has occured. Please try again.