Add a Review

  • I'm an aviation enthusiast and a big fan of this show, presented in Brazil by National Geographic and called "Mayday Desastres Aéreos" (something like "Mayday Air Disasters)".

    It's presented in a very easy way to understand so everybody can watch and enjoy it.

    One my my favorite episodes is the "Blow Out", that's the first episode of the second season. It's really amazing the pilot survived.

    The computer graphics is a must and recreates the aircraft models and situations with accuracy.

    The actors dramatization are not bad, but it seems to be overused sometimes.
  • This is a great show which besides some of the mediocre re-enacting, is almost perfectly presented. I only have a couple real complaints about it. If anything I wish that "ACI" covered even more about the investigations as they can sometimes go on for years. I would think that being a NTSB investigator would be an amazing job although it's sad it has to come to that. It must be very rewarding for those trying to figure out what went wrong & explaining to those who both survived, & to those that have lost loved ones exactly what happened. This is one of those shows that has stories that are absolutely astounding that cannot be made up, otherwise you wouldn't believe it. (The pilot outside, Air France hostages, Hawaiian airlines losing their top, the mid-air collision etc.) I would hate to wish for more accidents to happen, but unfortunately that is the only way for us to learn about them and make them safer. I know it's all about money, but why every system doesn't have at least 1 redundancy (2 for the major systems such as the hydraulics) built in, is beyond me. You can't put a price on these people yet we do it every day. Anyway love this show & for anybody trying to expand their knowledge as well as being entertained, this is the show for you.
  • I like this series. Being a pilot, I'm aware of when an aviation related program is nonsense or not, and most of the facts presented in this program are fairly accurate. It's a relief that it isn't all nonsense.

    The facts seem to be presented in such a way that the average non-pilot can understand what happened.

    Seeing this program makes you want to stay home and not travel, although statistically speaking, if one must travel, air travel is the safest way to go, with the exception (in North America) of the train.

    One episode you'll want to avoid is 'Blow Out', unless you want a headache. It's an hour of mostly camera shaking, when it is unwarranted.
  • Blueghost27 December 2012
    Most of us have flown, and have heard of those horrible airplane crashes that used to make big splashy news' headlines. They don't happen quite as often as they used to, and in our day and age of information overload, they tend to get drowned out with all the other news around the world. But, they still occasionally occur, and still draw attention.

    This show, "Air Crash Investigations", "May Day", or "Air Emergency", or whatever you want to call it, delves deep into the causes and effects of many a famous air liner disaster. And, amazingly enough, despite the theatrics in the recreations, educates the viewer as to the realities of air craft functions and procedures of operation. By the end of the episode you'll feel like an aerospace engineering expert.

    The format of the episodes follow a presentation of the event in brief, then an elongated version showing the developments to the event, followed by investigation and analysis. Nearly every episode has an act four that tells of the aftermath's, good and bad, of the disaster or crash that was investigated. All the while you, the viewer, are given great insight into the short comings of procedure, design or environment--more often than not it will be a combination of these factors that will lead to the inevitable; a crash of some form.

    Not every episode deals with a crash landing. Sometimes the crew is able to salvage mortal failure on part of the plane, and bring things to a safe end--or, more often than not, a relative safe end. Even when the pilots can bring back a wounded bird so the show still looks into what forced the pilots into that situation, and how the event culminated in its eventful end.

    One of the amazing things about this show is that the engineering aspects are explained such that any lay person, anyone who doesn't have any kind of engineering nor scientific background, are brought up to speed on the mechanics and science behind aircraft design so that they can understand, for the duration of the episode, the engineering aspects that were involved. Similarly procedures are explained as to how jets are flown, how they are berthed, how they land, takeoff, and are maintained. Interviews with key players, witnesses, experts in the field, make clear along with charts, animations and recreations provide visual cues to further explain and educate.

    As a casual viewer who's flown, but flies no more, I have a curiosity about some crashes here in the United States. The series explored and explained them. I also had a curiosity about the reputation of the DC- 10 during the 70s, and the series looked into that aircraft in a series of episodes as well. All the major crashes are examined; from the bombing of Pan Am over Lockerbie Scotland, to PSA Flight 182 in San Diego, to the more contemporary events such as British Airways flight 38 in Heathrowe.

    If this series has a shortcoming it's not that it caters to sensationalism (it uses that as a hook, but this is not the focus of the series), it's the actors in the recreations. It's a double edged sword with the performances because the actors needed to convey the emotional atmosphere of the participants involved, and therefore by necessity ham up the effort. It makes for an unusual viewing experience, but again gives the viewer a concept of the events and the actions of the people involved.

    Well, just as car wrecks create rubber-neckers, so it is that I found this show addicting. Again, in spite of its sensationalist promotion, it is an actual documentary with elements of recreated drama interspersed between interviews and explanations. Married to it is a kind of tension that holds the show together and keeps the viewer riveted. You already know what happens, but the show is going to show you why it happened, and, hopefully, what solutions resulted from these horrible events.

    It's not a show for the squeamish nor emotional. You might find yourself tearing up, being shocked, maybe outraged, but not very often will you feel settled after viewing this show.

    I do recommend it, but definitely watch at your risk.
  • 16 March 2015. With so many mystery thrillers out there along with reality television, it becomes pretty crowded and nauseating to watch it all. But here comes a docudrama that is firmly rooted in re-creations based on authentic presentation and in doing so, makes this television series among the most engaging and thrilling that the medium of film can offer out there. Each episodes contains documentary like precision with the reenactments carefully following dialogue that captures the reality of the moment making each episode vicariously compelling. The storyline is well explained and executed, the human element well presented along with an emotional connection, and the scientific road to discovery all make this CSI-like experience all the more intriguingly better than fiction. Highly rated for its appealing performances and substantive content that pulls the audience directly into the storm.
  • Just stumbled onto this recently (in its 10th season), on Smithsonian. Fortunately, they show previous season episodes each week, so it's possible to catch up. Also, FYI, Amazon has all of the seasons (not part of Prime).

    These are reenactments, with actors. HOWEVER, on many episodes, where the original personnel are available (e.g. passengers, pilots, from survivable accidents), they are interviewed, throughout the reenactment, i.e. interweaving the interviews with the reenactment. Occasionally, when no real flight information is available, some speculative dialog or actions (extrapolations) may be depicted, but most episodes are scripted with actions and dialog from both the Flight Data Recorder and Cockpit Voice Recorder information, in an attempt to meticulously recreate each incident. And, each episode typically includes interviews with the numerous accident investigation team members from the subsequent investigation (except for super-old accidents, where those personnel are now deceased).

    As someone else has mentioned, it's not like a "high-budget film", but they do use reasonable CGI, and what appear to often be aircraft simulators, to depict interior and exterior content that is quite believable.

    If you have ever asked the question "why do planes crash?", this series is for you. Again, if you fly a lot, and prefer to "not know" (i.e. "ignorance is bliss"), or if true stories, which are inherently horrific, due to the loss of life, are more than you can stomach, then this is definitely not for you. To be clear, they definitely do NOT show real pictures of crash victims, but they do occasionally show real pictures of wreckage, and sometimes depict crash scenes with actors, especially when showing recreations of rescues. Certainly, there is no avoiding thinking about the horror implied by these incidents, when you see the airframe carnage in some of those pictures/scenes, even when they are simply recreations.

    The episodes typically depict a (condensed) version of the resulting investigation, as they uncover individual facts and leads, allowing them to eventually understand all of the factors that lead to the accident. It might seem that they are sometimes injecting a bit of drama/tension in into the program, but I always remind myself, that they are often condensing a year-long investigation, plus in-flight reenactments, into a 40-ish minute program, and I think it's a minor miracle to pull that off, and I tend to cut the showrunners some slack, for their efforts.

    I would be remiss to not mention that lessons learned from many of these accidents are VERY applicable to non-aviation settings. In any field where lives (or monetary considerations) are a factor, and where "proper training", and/or failure to properly use/follow processes and procedures, could result in "bad things happening", there are important lessons that can be learned, here. It is truly depressing, just how many of these deadly accidents come back to improper training, failure to simply "follow a checklist", or even just deciding to "not fill out some form", because it seems like a waste of time.

    I would also be remiss to not stress, once again, that some of these incidents are disturbing, especially for regular travelers. There are incidents depicted here, which have occurred on (supposed) top notch airlines, where things that "should never happen", amazingly do. Cockpit crew members who appear to have never learned basic flying skills (for example, how to recover from a stall, which is something that private aircraft pilots typically learn in the first few hours of flight training), and "maintenance procedural nonsense" that has resulted in the loss of an entire aircraft, and everyone onboard. Again, if you can't handle knowing the truth, then some of these investigations will keep you awake at night.

    On the flip side of that, there are some stories of amazing piloting efforts, where flight crews have done just the opposite, and saved part, or all, of their passengers and crew by applying team work, flying skills, and simply being unwilling to give up, right to the very last second.

    So, this is a great series, for many reasons. It is almost a 10 out of 10 for me, but as have some other reviewers, I decided on a 9 (which might be unfair, again, considering how much they do with the time allotted).
  • Bronco4613 January 2012
    I didn't get to see any of the episodes of this great show when it was in it's first run. The episodes I've seen were all in rerun on the National Geographic Channel. This is an amazing well done show. There aren't any well know stars in any of these episodes but the subject matter is so compelling that's a big part of the success. In the cases where there were survivors those people have inserts into the story to elaborate on the telling of the story. These shows are very gripping; you get drawn right into these stories. You find yourself pulling for people literally praying that their character will survive what ever is going to happen. I hope National Geographic will run this who series again on NAT GEO. It's high caliber entertainment.
  • I've never seen a series go so in depth on different air crash investigations. The re-creations of each crash is incredible. It makes you feel like you're almost in that moment with the pilots, crew and passengers. The amount of detail that they go through with what happens before, during and after the crash is excellent. This show does a great job of walking the viewer through the crash investigation and explaining exactly how investigators were able to figure out why each crash happened. The only problem is that I've binge watched every episode that they've released already so they need to hurry up and release new episodes.
  • I have watched this show for years and am thrilled to see it return for its 18th season. I'm very proud that it's a Canadian show and have found the graphics and effects excellent for their current time. I find it fascinating (and sometimes heart-breaking), and really like that they make an effort to find any surviving crew and passengers as well as the NTSB (or equivalent), investigators to interview. Love it!
  • Real investigations, beautiful shots that reconstruct the events that really happened. Really well done program both for the experts and for the testimonies that speak of the various plane crashes.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Now I'm going to include the episode of Seconds from disaster air crash episode in this preview.I like this series,I never thought that air disaster can be very unique and have so many culprit.This series can developed phobia towards air travel,but I think every episode makes air travel faster.Pilot can learn a lot of thing from this series as some episode reveal that a simple mistake can cause plane to crash.For example pilot who watch this show would know how to react to rudder reversal,a blocked pitot tube scenario,not to use rudder aggressively in wake turbulence and much more.The reenactment of the actor is also good as it shows the passenger and crew turn upside down when the plane is rolling in mid air.And there are so many mistake and culprit that cause plane to crash.Some episode are quite repetitive but others crashes are more difficult to solve.The acting and investigation always keep me interested.The series also get better after season 3 as they focus more on investigating rather than the reenactment and with new intro.I also think that any people who involved in airliner company will be more aware towards aircraft maintenance and pilot will be more aware from making any mistake after watching this show.

    Overall both ACI and SFD plane crash increase aviation knowledge as well develop a bit of phobia.Worth watching.
  • A must watch for all interested in aircraft and air safety. However, it is not without its flaws.

    The quality of reenactments varies from decent to awful, but they seem to have improved in later episodes. Aircraft sound effects and take off cockpit drills are generally pretty boring, sometimes just plain wrong, and could do with improvement.

    Unlike Black Box, an air crash programme from the 1990s, actual cockpit voice recordings are never used; the reenactments often sound rather different to the real thing.

    The narrator will often be heard asking questions like "How could a state of the art xxxx aircraft crash?" etc, which can get a little annoying after awhile. Owing to widespread abuse on this programme, the term "State of the art" is pretty meaningless. Furthermore, "state of the art" does not mean "impossible to crash", as evidenced by the fact that new episodes continue to be made.

    Also annoying is the delicate manner in which aircraft manufacturers are handled. With a few exceptions, criticism of manufacturers seems to be carefully sidestepped. Aircraft fans might not like my saying this, but praise for aircraft manufacturers and their designs, particularly Boeing, is all too frequent. Just because they are a market leader does not mean their products are the safest permitted by the current level of technological advancement. Manufacturers and their products are highly fallible, as anyone who has looked beyond the detail given in this programme would know.

    NTSB bureaucrats really get to blow their trumpet on this show, too.

    Perhaps I have been too harsh a judge of this show. With all its faults, I still enjoy watching it.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This is more of a docudrama than a documentary. After reading the actual NTSB report on the Sully landing in the Hudson River I have doubts about this "reality" doc. They just went along with the BS that everyone wanting to make him out as a hero repeated. Sully was no hero. Even the NTSB said "nobody wanted to sully Sully". He was a public relations genus. He knew what to do after the accident to prevent his mistakes and rule violations from being emphasized because he was a crash investigator in the Air Force. LaGuardia is surrounded on 3 sides by water. Tis episode leaves out that he could have tried to land at LaGuardia and ditched in the water next to it if he could not make it. 5 out of 7 pilots made it in a simulator. But this makes for more dramatic and PC viewing, they thought.

    This makes me question the demonizing they have done with some ATC workers, especially women.
  • qui_j22 May 2020
    Been watching this series for a long time now. It is so very well done that I never miss an episode. It's a must watch for everyone who is interested in aviation. The replays and computer graphics are pretty amazing. Many of the crashes presented have made headlines, and this series provides the answers.

    Update: Season 18 is advertised as the latest season but the episodes are all repeats, some going back as far as 2010. Very disappointing. If you plan to purchase it, Caveat Emptor!
  • I was introduced to this series on the Smithsonian channel by a friend. Really like it because I enjoy flying & have learned a lot. Never knew English was the language "of the air" with all the manuals, checklists & instruments in English. I have wondered, though, how the multi-national crash investigations are handled, especially when the actual investigator is interviewed with sub-titles because they cannot speak English or are not fluent. I remember the episode of a French Caribbean airline departing Panama and crashing in Venezuela.. I could only imagine how those investigations were handled... English?
  • These Show deals with love action reality emotion its an excellent documentary of planes pilots terrorists etc. Great special effects and writing must watch.I also really like narrator and setting.I also like the acting and the testimony. These is a breathtaking masterpiece brilliant thriller action drama documentary Don't WATCH OTHER TRASH ON TV.MUST SEE. Some problems are its some times very slow but the action and the suspense make up for that. These is very realistic in a way that you can not imagine until you see some parts are cartoon but its very unusual.I can also say that these is better than lot of movies these days. And the stories are to amazing and realistic. Over all These an excellent piece of work.
  • This is the best documentary series I've ever seen. The computer generated images and re-enactment gives you a great picture of what really happened on the flight, what people were saying and doing at the time. It makes you feel you were on board that plane as well. These series are not meant to scare the general public to the point when no one wants to travel by plane, but in fact it's goal is to tell people what has been done to prevent something like this from ever happening again. I cannot wait to see the new episodes from season 12, which is in production at the moment. I'm also looking forward to see the episode about the recent Sukhoi SuperJet crash in the future seasons. I do believe it will be eerily similar to the Airbus show flight featured in season 9 episode 3- Pilot vs Plane. One of the downsides of the series is that sometimes the same actors portray different pilots in several episodes, which can be somewhat confusing.
  • While the subject is both terrifying to think about, and violent in its action, every attempt is made to focus on the combination of reasons for the failure: technical; weather; and/or human error, rather than lurid coverage of a blood-filled scene. Think: Law & Order, with less fake blood. There is no gratuitous gore; at most, there are injuries done with make-up. It pays to remember that the camera crews were not onsite for the crashes; it's staged, so empathy for passenger and crew victims, and their families is implicit in the scripting... but tragic loss is a given. Judge how impressionable your kids are; could they bear up at the open-casket funeral of a stranger? Sympathy can be learned; empathy is born or experience and observation.Putting on my parental hat, I'd watch this with 10- to 12-year-olds and up (depending on the individuals). Unlike so much video drivel, there are opportunities for thought, learning, career consideration and more. After all, it's on the Smithsonian Channel!
  • Graz-43 November 2022
    I am an aviation lover, as many here are. I find these programs so interesting, altho I have to say occasionally the 'in office' acting can sometimes be a bit lame...... but thats ok. Mostly very good.

    My father was a flight engineer on Brittanias, VC10's and ultimately 747's. I know i get my interest from him, as my siblings have no time for aviation.

    My wife thinks its a bit morbid watching these shows, so i am left on my own to emmerse into and enjoy them. Fab !

    Does anyone know if "Air Crash Investigation " has done a documentary on the 1967 crash of Iberia Flight 062, (55 years ago today) ?

    Brilliant show. I do shift work but always try to catch it or record.

    Many thanks

    G.
  • As a professional in the field, I studied the official accident reports for the number of cases pictured in this show. I am pleasantly surprised how Mayday (the original name of this Canadian program) gets the facts right, down to the key technical details.

    Despite this accuracy, the show is engaging, presented in a way the viewer is drawn into solving the mystery of what was the root cause of each accident. Knowing these answers is critical, as it helps us prevent similar occurrences in the future.
  • This programme is a great example of really good story telling which balances a strong narrative with just the right amount of technical detail for the non-expert. Anyone who watches will be able to follow it easily, though will be treated as an intelligent viewer. Highly recommended.
  • I enjoy this show but this is a rant of things they need to work on. Beware.

    This show while very insightful, though it is sometimes poorly executed. I'm a big aviation geek (Hoping to get my license soon) and sometimes the episodes really annoy me.

    1. One thing in every episode is the sounds. The sounds are always the same in every episode no matter if its a Lear 45 or a B737 or a DC10, they sounds are all the same. The sad thing is that even you (Yes the reader) can get very good sounds for very popular aircraft (and sometimes somewhat known aircraft) for around $45-$140, which should definitely be in their budget.

    2. A pattern which you can spot. You will notice in the team of NTSB (Or who ever else is investigation) you can see that they have a team of ~8 people, but only 2-3 will actually talk, the others will just nod or acknowledge (This is also sometimes with actors which they interview). Another thing is just the narrator always saying the same thing like "How could a start of the art MD-80 crash?"

    3. In every episode is that the cockpit layout REALLY bothers me. They're flying in a Boeing 767 for example, and the bottom half of the cockpit on each pilot's side is empty. It should be filled with instruments that are used or they need to work on the sizing of the cutouts for their panels. I also noticed they used a Saitek Pro Flight Yoke in the "Deadly Silence", which was a Lear 45, an episode, which REALLY set me off since they should have the budget to at least get a somewhat realistically looking yoke.

    4. Lastly, is the tiny flaws. These are tiny flaws that get me a bit upset and can EASILY be fixed and can redo the short 4-12 seconds of clip but they don't. Here are some examples

    • On an episode, it was based in ~1980 and the radar had a modern day Windows 7 mouse cursor in the middle of the radar screen.


    • On an episode ~2002, a mouse cursor can be seen on an altitude gauge (I think) for 2 seconds. This could of EASILY been retaped as no one was even talking but it wasn't


    This show is quite good and I enjoy watching but they really need to step their game up in some places.
  • The first couple of seasons were solid, well researched and presented. The interviews felt authentic, the source material were adapted with tact and taste. Subjective judgements of the show's presenters were treated as such, and the audience were encouraged to think for themselves. While it can be said that there are still some episodes that manage to hold out on their own, the general quality has gone down quite a bit with content added from poorly researched investigation reports from third world agencies. Bad reenactments with barely proficient actors does not help. Nowadays, independent content creators on youtube are using real tower audio recordings with analysis from veteran aviation specialists and real world pilots. NTSB reports, available for public release are now open to expert analysis, content deemed too complicated for public consumption are openly discussed in an accessible and interactive format. The sky is getting really crowded, really fast.
  • Obviously, this is the greatest show I've ever watched in my whole life. I don't know how to describe the most profound feelings I have for this wonderful series. May God bless the creators of the show for making our life more secure, helping people fight their fobias, and showing the reverse side of air transport business. Speaking of my own experience, watching the series helped me get over my depression, which had been a part of my life for at least a couple of years. There is no other film or show which could make me lose my breath like this one does. However, I would like to make a few remarks on some minor flaws... well, they are so to me, maybe not to others. There is too much of reenactment sometimes when it goes for passengers. They yell, they scream, the camera focuses on girls. I am sure that this is the way passengers usually behave when things don't go right on the plane. Let's also not forget it might be more profitable for the crew to show attractive girls as passengers rather than ordinary unprepared people with signs of fatigue and sleep deprivation. But I think it would be just a liiittle bit more respectful to the families of those who passed away if the reenactment focuses more on pilots and their plane. Anyway there has never been a film, series or a movie that I would so much love and enjoy. Thank you for creating all these brilliant episodes and making our life more secure!
An error has occured. Please try again.