Fingersmith (2005) User Reviews (45)

such pearl

[dark_willow_7 · 9/10 · 18 February 2006]

I had never read any of Sarah Waters' novels, or watched Tipping the Velvet. I only heard about Fingersmith when i was flipping through "The L word" websites. The storyline of Fingersmith interested me, yet i passed it away, thinking "Lesbian in Victorian period, that never ends well, i have enough of those lesbo series and movies that go no where"

However, during Christmas my local DVD store gave Fingersmith a discount, i brought the DVD, and my life has never been more colourful

This mini series deserves to be cherished and praised. The acting is so great that i call it rare. Sally Hawkins, Elaine Cassidy, Rupert Evans, Imelda Staunton, and many more that i can't name all, brought light and darkness to their characters. Just by a little gesture, a little look, a little touch, they made their characters real and as a viewer, i couldn't help it but take them home, keep them close.

Fingersmith, sets in Victorian area, is a story of Sue-a thief who loves and lives with her "Family" of pick-pockets. Little did she know that her fate is linked to Maud Lily-a somewhat shy, timid girl grows up in a Mansion miles and miles away. Maud's mother left her a fortune, but Maud herself can't touch it, unless she married. Worst of all, Maud's uncle makes sure she never will by keeping her prisoned in the house.

Enter Mr Gentlement, a charming, good-looking thief with a heart as bad as any. He wants Maud's fortune for himself, and in order to do so he sets Sue up as Maud Lily's maid, asking Sue to Persuade Maud to elope with him. as time goes by, Things would be simple, if Sue didn't fall in love with Maud.

And things would be simple, if the story was what i have just told. I do not wish to spoil, so i would like to stop there. But i can asure you that everything is twisted and turned before you can even aware of what has happened. Once it happened, you then question what would happen next. On top of that, the story is filled with passion unlike any others. There are no self-searching, sexuality questioning, "Oh my god do i like girls" moments, because the girls in Fingersmith are buried so deep in their own darkness that they barely be able to care. the story with such twisted plot moves as smooth as water, running passionately, but strangely calm.

Weeks have passed since i watched "Fingersmith", yet Maud's eyes still haunt me, and Sue's words still warm my heart "You pearl, you pearl, you pearl", she said. And such pearl it is.

One of the best lesbian stories told in the "big" screen

[wondernat · 9/10 · 20 March 2006]

I'm usually disappointed by what the media dubs "lesbian" movies these days: murderous bisexuals; psychotic murderous lesbians; women who experiment with other women, but end up with men at the end; ridiculously good-looking women who only get w/ each other to turn men on, etc.

Thankfully, FINGERSMITH is on a very high pedestal above this garbage. It is a credible love story acted MARVELOUSLY by every cast member, down to the least of the supporting actors. Aside from having a very engaging central conflict, the romance between the heroines is well developed and believable thanks to Cassidy and Hawkins.

I have also seen TIPPING THE VELVET, but FINGERSMITH is far superior to the former, both in character/conflict development and the quality of the acting.

FINGERSMITH is both satisfying and enjoyable to watch, offering lesbians everywhere a great follow-up act to BOUND.

Nobody does yearning like the BBC

[jfictitional · 8/10 · 13 April 2022]

A superbly-acted adaptation of Sarah Waters' novel, hobbled somewhat by the tacky mid-2000s BBC aesthetic (the editing is almost spastic at times) and the sense that 3 hours was somehow both too much and not enough time to tell this tale. Then again, "The Handmaiden" - which I've yet to see - is nearly as long. Maybe it finds the right balance.

The incredible chemistry between Sally Hawkins and Elaine Cassidy carries the first episode, so of course the second can only suffer in comparison, but what I really wanted was time for scenes to breathe and unfold. There's so much plot to cover that the pace becomes frantic, with increasingly loopy twist upon twist, when all I care about is seeing these two find each other (again). Every furtive glance, every time they dare to even try being honest with their words, is more riveting than who is conning who at any given moment.

Back when I reviewed "Portrait of a Lady on Fire," I suggested that no film in the English language could ever evoke the feel of love and passion the way the French do. (Get outta here with your BS, "Ammonite.") This is not the exception to that rule, but damn if it doesn't come close.

Brilliant adaptation

[Heligena · 10/10 · 12 April 2005]

Having read all of Sarah Waters books i was eagerly looking forward to a BBC adaptation of Fingersmith. Especially since Tipping the Velvet had been done so well by old familiar Andrew Davies.

I was not disappointed with the results, in fact i think this might be on a par with TTV; both romantic and entertaining. And not as so many ignorant people would have you believe, a pointless lesbian romp. Having been a fan of Elaine Cassidy's since seeing her guileless turn in Felicia's Journey i thought she embodied both hard deception and a growing fragility as Maud. Her transformation was believable and impressive to watch. I recognised Sally Hawkins as Zena Blake from Tipping the Velvet, a small role primarily so i didn't have as many expectations but she was astounding in the role of Sue Trinder. Her eyes were mesmerising conveying everything from rage to absolute despair. The two of them acting together, combining these talents made this drama unmissable. Of course Imelda Staunton was amazing as usual, she is unmistakably a national treasure and the supporting cast were all of a high standard. Even the direction from the fairly unknown Aisling Walsh used contrasting yet beautiful shades of blue for Briar and brown for London.

However as much praise must be given to Ransley the script writer. To turn a 600 page book where every line is of the highest quality into a three hour extravaganza is a huge feat. He illuminated the main revelations at a steady pace whilst giving us plenty of back-story and character development at the same time. He has my full admiration.

In conclusion, a brilliant adaptation where all involved gave 100% and making this one of the best BBC dramas i've seen.

Compelling viewing. Loved every minute.

[teenyclb · 10/10 · 11 April 2005]

Having read the book prior to watching this adaptation you would think that it would have lost some of its thrill. However, the story is so clever I could never tire of it.

Sally and Elaine really put their hearts into their roles and brought out so much of the characters. I fell in love with the story and the women all over again.

Beautiful to watch thanks to direction, settings and costumery. Despite the plot speed of television, I don't feel that anything important was lost in transit. It had me on the edge of my seat throughout with lots of wonderful stomach-trembling moments. Enjoyed it thoroughly. This is the kind of television I have been waiting for.

Love, passion, and excellent acting

[flypoodle · 10/10 · 21 April 2005]

I love Sarah Waters's Fingersmith, and was worried about the TV adaptation as I'd been disappointed by the BBC's version of Tipping the Velvet (which although beautiful to look at was let down by Keeley Hawes not being able to sing, and Rachael Stirling not being able to act). Fingersmith is a very tightly plotted novel with breath taking twists and turns and I wondered if this could be done justice to in just 3 hours.

I needn't have worried. The adaptation was excellent, very little cut out, and went along at a cracking pace (although I did wonder whether if you hadn't read the book, would you miss things?). It had the look and feel of a BBC classic costume drama and i kept having to remind myself that this is a contemporary book.

The acting was stellar. Sally Hawkins acting her heart out as Sue Trinder, and Elaine Cassidy, a slow burner, who by the end of the story was incandescent as Maud Lilley. The love, the passion, the realisation of the acts of betrayal both would have to perform, were written on their faces. It was a joy to watch.

I hope Rachael Stirling was watching: that's how you play a Sarah Waters character!

Love, love, love this DVD

[dmschreib · 10/10 · 24 August 2006]

I never dreamed when I started watching this DVD that I would be totally mesmerized by it within minutes. The story was completely absorbing and entertaining. The acting was superb. The biggest surprise of all was how I would be so completely enchanted by the love these two young women radiated across the screen. Their initial physical encounter for me was by far the most tender, romantic, delightful, vicariously enthralling love scenes I have ever witnessed on film. I literally stopped breathing. I could not believe the chemistry between the two actresses. With no nudity or graphic sex, they conveyed more passion and titillation than any American production could ever hope to evince. Bravo to the author, the screenwriter, the director and the cast.

A decent and probably a faithful adaptation of the book, but Ah-ga-ssi is way better.

[siderite · 6/10 · 3 June 2018]

I only watched this because I had watched the 2016 Korean movie The Handmaiden and I was intrigued when I heard it was based on an English book from 2002. I wanted to see how BBC did it. However, while probably faithfully adapting the story in the book, Fingersmith is not a very good movie. It has pacing issues, logic holes and in the end, a whole lot of complications that are pointless. It is well casted, mostly played very well, so I guess the only issues are with production values and the plot, which might be blamed on the book, instead. Hindsight is always perfect, true, but if nothing else, this film shows how great The Handmaiden truly was.

The story is basically a thriller and going through it would spoil it irredeemably, but if you insist on watching Fingersmith, do try Ah-ga-ssi afterward. I thought the real star of the film was Imelda Staunton, who had only a few scenes, but was great in all of them. Both Elaine Cassidy and Sally Hawkins were cute and good in it. I thought Rupert Evans was mostly over the top, while Charles Dance appeared for a few minutes at most. He's always cool.

on Fingersmith...

[ceejay99 · 10/10 · 5 October 2005]

This movie was incredible!!!! I did not know the back story on it so I needed to let it unfold before me on DVD. It had many twists and turns but still kept the story fresh and exciting. The acting by Elaine Cassidy was in a word Brilliant as well as Sally Hawkins. The storyline is rich with plausible occurrences as well as fresh ideas from the present.

There is truly something about Ms. Cassidy's eyes that leaves "a mark." This movie is a refreshing look on the way in which we look at the 'victorian times' and how we view that society. A very worthwhile watch.

I have mixed feelings about this film

[[e-mail] · 7/10 · 29 May 2007]

I'm not exactly sure why I ordered "Fingersmith" from Netflix -- probably, because I enjoy BBC dramas, it was on a list of recommendations. I had no idea what I was about to see. The plot, which I will only describe in general so as not to spoil it for anyone who will see it after reading my review, has more twists and turns than a mountain road in the Rockies, of the sort that customarily appear in "caper" movies. They are very unusual in a period drama. Not having read the novel (and I do not intend to do so), I was totally unprepared for the surprise that ends the first segment on the DVD and equally surprised by the subsequent twists and turns. Nonetheless, it is extremely well acted by the two young principals (by Sally Hawkins,in particular, as Sue and by Elaine Cassidy as Maud) and, in key supporting roles, by Imelda Staunton as the mother figure in a house of thieves and by Charles Dance as the rich uncle who collects pornographic materials and who rescues young Maud from the mad house where her mother lived to be his secretary. The lesbian affair between Maud and Sue is the "big news" in the movie, but really not its centerpiece. The centerpiece is a plot to steal the fortune that Maud is due on her 21st birthday. The turns and twists in the plot add tension, though not much credibility, to the movie. However, no viewer is likely to doubt that Maud and Sue will somehow end up together -- improbably -- as the credits roll. Although one has been raised as a ady, and serves a collector of pornography, and the other is a pickpocket posing as a lady's maid, the author obviously means for them to live together in the end. It's a bit difficult to swallow, since each has conspired to cheat the other. Despite these reservations, I liked movie well enough. It does not quite deserve the praise that others have lavished on it. The most fearsome and interesting scenes take place inside the madhouse where one of the two young women has been confined until she is able to escape and return to London to bring the story to its unexpected conclusion. Sally Hawkins (Sue) is a very impressive young actress, able to convey her character's cascading and changing emotions with her facial expressions and her eyes. No doubt we'll see more of her. I certainly hope so.

atmosphere, emotion, suspense

[gm-1 · 10/10 · 27 November 2005]

It is always difficult to bring a 450 pages book down to a three hours film. I read the book before, and I found the BBC production dealing with this difficulty in the best way possible. The qualities of the book haven't been lost: the dense and lively depiction of a fingersmith patchwork family in London in the 1860s, the cold and obscene cruelty in which Maud is brought up, the characterization of different social groups by different ways of speaking, the unexpected and surprising twists of the story, the way the film makes the spectators look different at the same scenes when they are told first from Sue's point of view then from Maud's one. The main actors do very good, and especially the growing love between the two women is convincingly developed, with a first culmination in a very tender love scene between the two and finally forgiving all the evil they were ready to do and did to each other, because they still love each other.

For each of her books the author, Sarah Waters, has thoroughly investigated what life was like in British 19th century. While in Tipping the Velvet it was the world of the vaudeville theaters and the beginning of social movements, in Affinity the dreadful reality of women penitentiaries and the fashionable evocation of spirits, in Fingersmith she depicts the public ceremony of hanging people in London and the inhuman treatment of persons supposed or declared disturbed in asylums based on the reading of sources and scientific research. This is very well transferred to the film so that the corresponding scenes show a high grade of historic truth. I highly recommend this film production because it offers three hours of colorful Victorian atmosphere, vivid emotions, and suspense.

Good story, but the remake is better

[isadoraopossum · 6/10 · 10 December 2020]

This may be the first time I've ever liked a remake better than the original... I'm guessing the writer had some ideas on how to improve the story for The Handmaiden and threw those into that script. I do love The Fingersmith story, and this miniseries was good, but I'm glad I saw The Handmaiden first because that's the better of the two screen adaptations imo, and this way it wasn't spoiled for me.

Screenwriter & Film-maker Spoil a Masterpiece With Unnecessary, Clever Complexities

[madcardinal · 5/10 · 4 July 2011]

"Fingersmith" is divided into two episodes, and it is truly a hit and miss film. While watching the first episode, I thought I was experiencing one of the finest films ever made - it developed like a Dickensian novella courageously and poetically weaving a tale of lesbian love. Until just before the end of the first episode, I was fully expecting to give "Fingersmith" my highest recommendation.

The organic kernel of the movie - as presented in the summary on this web site - is superb and of the highest quality. The movie goes off the tracks, however, at the very end of the first episode and never really gets back on track after that. There are too many plot twists which stretch the viewer's capability for suspension of disbelief past the breaking point. The film becomes much too impressed with its own cleverness and the second episode just feels inauthentic and overly contrived. It's almost an insult to the viewer's intelligence and a betrayal of the time so well invested up to that point. It also robs the film of its crux and primary dilemma, namely, after wrestling with her powerful feelings of love, her past loyalties and moral and ethical considerations, what decision will Sue Trinder make regarding the plan to defraud Maud?

There's no doubt about it, simpler would have been much much better in this case. Nine stars for the first episode. One star for the second episode. Five stars overall. This could have been so much better.

Fingersmith - An Amazing Adaption

[cuddley_goffness · 10/10 · 10 May 2005]

This was indeed an amazing adaption. I missed the first episode so I unfortunately missed out on the bonding between the characters and the smooth flow of the storyline. But as soon I watched the second and then the third instalment I was just blown away. I ordered the DVD less than a week later and unable to wait for it to come I went straight out and brought the book. From the moment I opened it I was hooked, I just couldn't put it down. I decided to finish the whole book before I dare watch the DVD at all. I preferred the book because it got inside the characters minds, you could understand totally where they were coming from and what there role was within the story. They missed a lot out of the adaption which was disappointing as the book is a master piece and I think they could have done it superbly if they had been able to stretch it over a longer period of time. But considering only being able to be fitted into a 3 hour slot I think it was done excellent. It followed the main twisted storyline brilliantly. And the actors which were enrolled as the main characters where amazing! The love making scene was pure beautiful. It was so tender and loving and just showed how natural homosexual love can be. I was totally blown away with both the book and the TV adaption! I loved both of Sarah Waters previous novels and also found the Tipping the Velvet adaption quite enjoyable. But when I read and watched Fingersmith I knew none of her previous novels/adaption could beat it. Sarah Waters has indeed exceeded herself this time! I recommend that you watch this adaption! If Tipping the Velvet wasn't your thing, then don't let it put you off this one. Fingersmith is a whole new ball game. It is a beautiful yet dark twisted story about love, greed and betrayal...

A MUST SEE!

Best twist ever?

[wtsttx · 9/10 · 30 March 2022]

Skill fully evocative of Dickens, Collins and Conan Doyle this is top draw story telling. All the performers rise to the occasion and what a great twist at the end of an already serpentine plot.

Great writing excellent cast

[candicegallimore · 10/10 · 8 December 2020]

I loved the film and then I loved the book. This was a rare time when a film made me want to read a book and both were as excellent as each other. I hate a story with a queer story line for the sake of having one but Fingersmith has so much else going on that the queer storyline seems much more like a sub plot.

This movie is amazing!!

[lazaragarcia2002 · 10/10 · 5 February 2007]

I watched this movie recently and fell in love with it. I loved the storyline and the actors. It has a little of everything. I was completely taken by the unfolding of the story. It has so many surprises along the way. I highly recommend it. In fact, I loved it so much that I ran out and bought the book. I felt I had to read it in order to appreciate the art in the writing behind the movie. I also wanted to make sure I didn't miss anything that was in the book but kept out of the movie. I recommend people who love the movie to read the book because there is enough difference in the book, especially in the second episode, to want to read it. It has become my favorite movie. I am now a Sarah Waters and Elaine Cassidy fan!!

Good Movie But

[robert-locascio · 7/10 · 1 January 2019]

Not as good as The Handmaiden, although This Movie Came out 10 years before the The Handmaiden, If You Want To See This Movie While it is Very Good. I Watched This Movie Before The Handmaiden. and i liked it a lot but after seeing the The Handmaiden This Movie Pales Next to It. If You Don't mind Subtitles I Would Recommend The Handmaiden

Watch it!

[lynnsalcambrodted · 9/10 · 17 June 2022]

Susan Trinder (Sally Hawkins) lives in one of London's poorer boroughs, in a house with the best view of the county's gallows. She grew up here with a thrown-together family of thugs, including her foster mother Mrs. Sucksby, who takes care of unwanted babies. One day, a thug friend named "Gentleman" comes along and offers Susan and her family the deal of a lifetime: Susan is to become the new maid to Maud (Elaine Cassidy), a country lady being employed as a secretary (and practically held captive) by her uncle, who will receive twenty thousand pounds (a pound was worth about 125x more then than it is now) when she marries, from her mother's inheritance. Susan is to befriend the lonely Maud and convince her to run away with Gentleman, who comes to visit for a few weeks as an art teacher. Afterwards, Maud will be sent to a madhouse (her mother had already ended up there). But Susan falls in love with Maud and also awakens unexpected feelings in her ...

The novel Fingersmith was written by Sarah Waters, who has written some great books with lesbian protagonists. I can only recommend reading the novel before the movie, although it can be read with profit afterwards as well. Director Aisling Walsh has done a good job of directing the film, although certain aspects of it, especially background information, are naturally missing.

If you think Fingersmith is just a costume drama, you're wrong, even if the first 60 minutes of the film (which was originally a mini-series with 3 episodes of 60 minutes) match this expectation in all respects. The fact that there is much more behind it, from larger thrilling story arcs to fascinating details, is revealed as the film progresses. Of course, Fingersmith still lives on the flair of the 19th century and picks up various stylistic elements (such as the female fainting attacks).

Go to bestlesbianmoviesever dot com for the rest of the review.

A good series but not as good as Tipping the Velvet

[Tommi-Gustafsson · 7/10 · 13 September 2005]

I watched this series after Tipping the Velvet, for which I gave 10/10 grade. I had read user comments on this and I expected an equally good series, or if possible, even better. At this point I must emphasize that this series is good, and it definitely captured me throughout it and thus worth watching. However, I didn't enjoy it as much as Tipping the Velvet, for the following reasons:

1. Less passion, love, and related sexual content. There were surprisingly little emphasis in these elements, which I held integral for a love story. Fingersmith felt like a watered down version of Tipping the Velvet.

2. Similarly, as in Tipping the Velvet, the story had three parts: the beginning, a shocking second part, and the ending. The second part should have been the climax of the story (as in Tipping the Velvet), but instead it was almost totally skipped, perhaps due to inability to make shocking but believable asylum content. The series should have been in three parts, featuring two cliffhangers, with a lot more focus on the second part.

3. Almost no weight was given to what Fingersmiths were and how it affected their personalities. I found it rather annoying that the series did not properly address such central topic.

4. The ending was much more hasty than in Tipping the Velvet. Fingersmith left several interesting plot lines open.

Despite these shortcomings, Fingersmith is a good series, and well worth 7/10. However, it is not a classic like Tipping the Velvet.

Excellent Victorian Romance with a Sting

[tm-sheehan · 9/10 · 5 May 2020]

My Review - Fingersmith 9/10

With an excellent screenplay by Peter Ransley adapted from the novel by Sarah Waters who also wrote "Tipping the Velvet" (2002) another great story and BBC series exploring Lesbian lifestyles in Victorian London of course never discussed in those times even Queen Victoria refused to countenance such goings on were even possible . She made sure though the full force of the law imprisonment and execution in some cases were restricted to male homosexuality. "Gentleman Jack "the wonderful Sally Wainright series due for a second season this year ,"Tipping the Velvet " and "Fingersmith "form a trio of quality romantic period dramas that just happen to highlight female homosexuality. This 3 part series also set in Victorian England is about Susan "Sue" Trinder a "fingersmith " ( British slang for thief) who lives in the slums of London with a baby farmer (person who looks after unwanted babies) Mrs.Sucksby. When a once rich man, who gambled all his money away, presents them with a scam that has a payout of 40,000 pounds, Sue signs on to swindle rich Maud Lilly. Maud is an orphan who lives with her uncle, but what exactly is going on in the Lilly house? Sue will pose as Maud's maid so that Mr. Rivers (the gentleman) can get close to and eventually marry her. Their plan is to put Maud in the madhouse and take the money for themselves. All goes astray though when Sue falls in love with Maud. And the question is: Who can you trust? An excellent excellent cast starring a favourite actress of mine Sally Hawkins as Sue Trinder Sally Hawkins, who plays Sue Trinder, also appeared as a maid in the earlier adaptation of another Sarah Waters' books Tipping the Velvet (2002)..Guillermo del Toro wanted to work with Sally Hawkins after he saw her in this. He went on to write The Shape of Water (2017) with her in mind and that film won her a nomination for Best Actress Academy Award in 2018. Elaine Cassidy an Irish actress who has also had a very successful film and television career is also excellent cast as Maud Lilly secretary to her cold and emotionally challenged very rich Uncle Christopher Lilly who removed her from an asylum as a child. The 3 episodes are intriguing because they take you on a journey then just when you think you know what's about to happen you find out that logic doesn't always work and you see the story portrayed from the other characters perspective and it's totally at odds with what you expected ts a great portrayal of human frailties and self preservation. I watched the DVD's so nor sure what streaming channel it's on but catch it if you can.

great actresses

[SnoopyStyle · 7/10 · 30 December 2015]

Maud Lilly (Elaine Cassidy) grew up in the Institute of the Insane after her mother's death. She is taken in by her cold-hearted uncle (Charles Dance) who keeps her under his control. She doesn't know that she stands to inherit a fortune if she gets married. Richard Rivers (Rupert Evans) is a con-man who has weaseled his way into her life looking to elope with Maud and then steal her inheritance. Her maid, who is his accomplice, gets replaced and he loses access. He hopes to hire Sue Trinder (Sally Hawkins) as part of the scheme by slipping her in as the new maid. Sue was left to Mrs. Sucksby (Imelda Staunton) as a baby. They lived in the shadow of the hangman's noose with pickpockets and thieves making a low living in the London slums. However it's a world of secrets, double-crosses and hidden history.

Sally Hawkins and Imelda Staunton are the best actors around and they don't disappoint. Elaine Cassidy starts out as a naive innocent and her turn is effectively done. The turn is shocking for people who haven't read the novel and it's lots of fun. The constant stream of reveals does get a bit tiring and the first half can be a bit slow. However this is still very watchable from start to finish.

Pure Lesbian Erotica

[nalajupiter · 3/10 · 31 December 2018]

If you are into lesbian erotica this is for if not the storyline is fair the twist is good but there are long stretches were nothing happens

Expect the unexpected!

[M1racl3sHapp3n · 10/10 · 11 December 2017]

When I started watching this series I was impressed by the accuracy of its scenery, costumes and the realistic acting. I thought the plot was something I had seen somewhere else but then something happened which totally surprised me! If you think you've seen it all then this movie is for you because it will make you realize that there is still a lot to understand about human nature. Impeccable acting and believable characters. I'll definitely watch it again!

Easily one of my favorite films ever

[x-fadetoblack-x · 10/10 · 3 September 2010]

I'm not going to bother with typing out a synopsis or a summary of the plot, I don't want to spoil anything as this is a story that you really need to experience for yourself. To be honest, I was very skeptical about this movie. I have not read the book, nor have I read any of Sarah Waters' books or watched any of her other films, but after seeing this movie, I definitely plan to. I've already gone and ordered the book of Fingersmith and I can't wait to begin reading it.

I have owned this DVD for MONTHS and sort of pushed it aside because it's a rather long movie and I was skeptical about how this movie would play out. Well, let me tell you, after seeing it for the first time last night, I was completely blown away and I am kicking myself for not watching this masterpiece sooner. In fact, I now think that the movie is too SHORT! I originally planned to watch the first part on one night and the second part on another night, but I just couldn't stop and stayed up till 2am watching all of it. I've fallen in love with the story, the setting, and the characters; the acting is superb, like nothing I've seen before. This movie will break your heart while at the same time give you butterflies like you've never felt before. It's absolutely beautiful and terrifying at the same time, and I highly recommend it. Don't let the fact that it's set in a Victorian period scare you away. They literally made a masterpiece and I can't wait to read the book.