User Reviews (202)

Add a Review

  • Weeds is a hilarious comedy, following other trend-setting shows like The Sopranos and Six Feet Under that deal with real life issues (using real life language). Sometimes wonderfully dark, and sometimes very blunt, the humour seems to suit each episode's general mood.

    The quickly progressing story lines provide plenty of interest and we quickly develop a sympathy for the main characters through some genuinely emotional dilemmas, especially Nancy, but this is no doubt helped by the fact that she is a gorgeous soccer mum in distress.

    The small number of episodes in each series might be a little disappointing, but is easily forgiven in helping to maintain the high quality and originality of each episode. I can't wait for season 2.
  • For years Weeds is being the "everybody-talks-about" series but I never had the opportunity to watch it. But finally I did it, and I did it desperately because the show is addictive. So finally I could understand why it got so much attention.

    First of all, the cast is amazing. Mary-Luise Parker, as Nancy Botwin, fits so well in her character and she is so charismatic and so beautiful and so subtle, gentle, comprehensive and polite that it's almost impossible dislike her. Elizabeth Perkins, as Celia Hodes, my god, that woman rocks! She's so naturally dried by the unhappy life she has built that even a spontaneous smile seems like a rock. I can't believe that Elizabeth Perkins never won an award for this character until now because every moment is an outstanding performance and I mean it! It's a shame that her character lost so much of her potentials to a point of being kicked out of the show because Celia was one of the gears of the show.

    The most interesting things about the show were not the drugs, neither was Nancy living a hell each new day, nor the mistakes each character does during the episodes, but yes the social matters that it pointed. I'm Brazilian and I live in a small suburban city like the imaginary Agrestic/Magestic, so... I know a lot how is to survive in a place where you're surrounded by ignorant people that are moved just by an inexistent appearance. It's so revolting to a point that sometimes you just want to do things just to provoke them and play with their abstraction of reality, and the series shows it in a very intelligent and interesting way so you feel connected by it.

    But now, after 6 years and some changes, Weeds seems to have lost most of what made it so interesting during the years becoming just another dramedy and Weeds is now just all about a woman dealing with an everyday drama that doesn't fit anymore. While the first 4 seasons were amazing and subtle in its subject, the last 2 seasons lack of the cleverness that once existed. Weeds now is being pushed to something we don't know anymore and it's showing signs of tiredness and completely losing its identity and also its characters. But that happens with every kind of show sooner or later.

    But anyway... if you have the opportunity to watch at least the first 4 seasons, do it. Weeds is not about dealing with drugs, but a way to express the hypocrisy of each single person in the world.

    I give 8 just for the show in a whole, but the first 4 seasons deserve 10.
  • fwomp26 July 2006
    Warning: Spoilers
    WEEDS is a complicated series currently airing on the cable network SHOWTIME, the same corp. that brought us DEAD LIKE ME and other controversial story lines. And WEEDS certainly is wonderfully bizarre.

    Mary-Louise Parker (THE WEST WING) stars as Nancy Botwin, a recent widow with two children and a cash flow problem. She lives in the fictitious town of Agrestic in Anywhere Suburbia, America. In fact, the shows lead-in goes through great pains to show us how common an area she and her family live in. This is vital since most of today's drug culture tends to live right under our proverbial noses. And the drug, as the title intends, is marijuana, often considered shameful by some to be considered "illegal" while others throw tantrums about its gateway significance. But Nancy has to feed her family and she'll do whatever it takes to ensure their survival.

    In the midst of this seemingly benign town we have a troop of old and new pot smokers. The older generation is exhibited by none other than Kevin Nealon (ANGER MANAGEMENT) whose character, Doug Wilson, is a bored and immature accountant. Self-centered and completely useless in terms of assisting his neighbors, his character is absolutely fantastic. You could easily picture him still in high school if it weren't for his extremely receding hairline and the family minivan he drives. The newer generation is brought to light by Nancy Botwin's brother-in-law, Andy, played by the excellent Justin Kirk (FLANNEL PAJAMAS, 2006). He has no direction in life and is now firmly entrenched in Nancy's home. His failings at life are mirrored through his careless attitudes toward women or growing in any meaningful way. But once in a while — just occasionally — he'll make a remark of wonderful profoundness that blows Nancy away. He also is a much needed father-figure (although a VERY screwed up one) for Nancy's two boys, Shane (Alexander Gould, FINDING NEMO) and Silas (Hunter Parrish, RV). It is Silas, the high schooler, whom we get to see experiment with the emerging drug culture that surrounds his household. Although initially unaware of his mother's "business", he quickly reveals to the viewer that he's "not stupid" about what's happening under his own roof.

    Nancy's friends are a mixed bag. Celia (Elizabeth Perkins, BIG), is a member of the PTA, has a child who suffers with being overweight, and recently found out her husband had an affair with the local, and beautiful, Asian tennis instructor. As the series progresses, we learn that Celia has breast cancer and this comes as devastating news for someone so infatuated with one's appearance (as seen through the mother-daughter relationships). The Shepard's, a black family that live in a "bad part of town", act as Nancy's suppliers of the green leaf. They battle finances versus keeping their business strictly business whenever Nancy comes around (which fluctuates as her business expands and contracts).

    The wonderful thing about this series is that it puts a mess of moral material in the viewer's lap. What is wrong with marijuana when Percocet and other heavy narcotics are readily available via a doctor's prescription? Is it wrong for a person to support their family by dealing in something as shady as drug trafficking? Can a woman be both a loving and compassionate mother while at the same time selling something potentially addicting? Is it hypocritical for someone to sell "the stuff" while at the same time punishing their kids when they catch them doing some of it? Quite a moral quagmire, I'd say.

    The other thing that makes this series work is it's sexy. Mary-Louise Parker has that ...something about her that makes her both a respectable looking woman and just a tad slutty. She's a sexual being who struggles with life in the shadow of her husband's death and has to decide what's best for her, her kids, and her husband's memory; most times these things are in direct opposition of each other. Elizabeth Perkins mirrors much of Parker's character in that she too has that respectable/slutty look but also some uppityness ...until her cancer rears up. Then she becomes more introspective and the slut takes over, for a while.

    The series producers also put in a deaf and sexually promiscuous girlfriend for Nancy's son, Silas. This added an entirely new dimension to Silas' character as he's forced to grow-up without a father to guide him through this teenage sexual minefield and he finds solace with the deaf girl's household more than with his own whenever internal family problems arise.

    This first season took about two episodes to get rolling, but once it did there was no stopping it. You really need to open your mind to the possibilities surrounding this show. It's not JUST about drugs. It's about the people that are shoved into this niche group for the sake of survival, and it's captivating to watch how their flawed lives intermingle. Pot smoker or not, these characters are headed for interesting days. Season two has already been purchased by SHOWTIME, which would indicate WEED might be picking up speed and continue smokin' for some time.
  • I haven't been a dedicated fan of a TV series since Moonlighting back in the 80's but I'm totally hooked on Weeds. Mary-Louise Parker plays the role of Nancy Botwin perfectly! As a widowed housewife trying to maintain an upper class lifestyle for herself and her two sons by selling weed, she obviously encounters problems maintaining her two roles....mother and drug dealer. Parker really emphasizes this "dual role" and she does it brilliantly....you'll find yourself really feeling for the character and cheering for her all the way. Elizabeth Perkins in the role of Celia, Nancy's close friend, is phenomenal. Watch her carefully in this show, her brilliant acting and her characters dry sarcastic nature provides much of the shows' comedic value but it is sometimes very subtle. I personally think Perkins deserves a supporting Emmy for this one. In short, Jenji Kohan has scored big-time with Weeds and I hope it enjoys a good long run on Showtime....I'm definitely a dedicated fan! My only suggestion....episodes should be an hour long!
  • Mary Louise Parker plays a widowed suburban housewife forced to create new ways to generate enough income to support the lifestyle she and her family had become accustomed before her husband departed. Parker and Elizabeth Perkins are excellent representations of housewives dealing with serious problems in this unrealistic yet frighteningly realistic comedy about living in the suburbs. Unrealistic because it is doubtful that this scenario could actually take place but realistic because the actors portray real suburban characters that you might meet anywhere in the US. The PTA scenes are a scream to any mom that has attended these mundane meetings. Kevin Nealon is great as the always high accountant looking to score and Justin Kirk accurately plays Parkers outrageously screwed up brother-in-law that can't seem to stay out of trouble. Even though this is a comedy, it also examines important aspects of suburban life. Drug abuse, race relations, cancer, homosexuality, mortality and morality are all explored in a real life yet unreal setting. It kind of makes you think while you are laughing at the superb dialog.
  • tommy_6811 February 2009
    I don't really get hooked on a TV series, i usually just watch a show if it's on or not or if I'm in the mood. But i have to say Weeds got me more hooked than a crack-addled prostitute. Every episode just wanted me to watch the next one and i ended up buying every season. Gotta say season 2 is the best if i had to choose one but its a hard decision. Every time Doug comes on screen I'm in stitches, has to be the funniest, wittiest and dopey character ever invented for TV. This is the most creative, most hilarious TV show since friends, and definitely the most addictive. Once you watch Weeds, you'll want to watch it again and again and again.
  • If there is a heaven, it's got an endless supply of Weeds episodes. Consistently robbed by Award Shows, under-sold, under-advertised, it's got the most creative writing, the funniest, most daring actors, and what's amazing is that every season tops the last. How long can they keep it up? Personally, I've seen every episode, 4 or 5 seasons already, and my only complaint is that they only make about a dozen episodes a year. Way to keep people jonesing! The writers, cast and crew should have their every need catered to, and their only responsibility should be to make more Weeds episodes. More episodes, longer episodes, keep everyone in the cast, and keep spreading the word so I can laugh about it with more people. These are my only suggestions. You might want to watch from Season One, as everything builds, and references to the past are made. The topics discussed or engaged in seem to be all the ones that are taboo in our society: guns, drugs, sex, politics, abortion, etc. Sometimes, the characters choose wisely, and sometimes they do wrong, but even when they do, it ends up making us, the viewers, all the wiser for it. But ultimately, it's about a family. And that's the main thing that keeps me coming back. It's a meal of madcap clever zaniness sprinkled throughout with moments of intense sunshiny love. Aww!
  • I have been watching weeds and i am up to the 4th episode of the 3rd season.

    The performances on this show by every actress and actor are fantastic. Even the young actor who plays Shane is an excellent actor. Mary Louise Parker's portrayal of Nancy Botwin is awesome, she is a very good actress who can show intense emotion. The Andy character has a great presence and always makes me laugh.

    Weeds is a very smart, funny comedy and a sad, intriguing drama which i hope lasts a for a long while. I recommend it to anyone who enjoys a good mix of smart humor and drama.
  • The show was well written and well cast - EXCEPT for Nancy. A terrible mother and a worse person - but somehow makes her way as the protagonist.
  • I only subtract one point because it's only a half-hour as opposed to an hour long show. I wish it were longer every episode. I am NEVER disappointed in the quality. One liners, twists, drama, LOL moments... It hasn't mis-stepped once as far as I'm concerned. There isn't a single cast member that doesn't play their role perfectly. The writing is superb. And how hot is Mary-Louise Parker? Oh my god...

    I DO miss the theme song--especially from second season when they were all covers, but the new openings are inspired as well and don't take up as much time, thus giving me a few extra seconds of show!

    This is by far one of the best shows on television. Especially in these days of "reality" TV. Finally something worth watching. Please extend it to an hour per episode!
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Weeds initially caught me by surprise with its great set of interesting characters each with their own set of problems but intertwine one way or another, acting by everyone was great, and its plot is constantly moving and engaging. In a Breaking Bad sort of way, a single mom tries to make ends meet by selling drugs and building her illegal business which is always great entertainment. But after Season 3, things drastically go downhill with Season 4 being a buffer. Why? The show Weeds becomes about...NOT weed. It very unfortunately transitions into primarily being a drama by Season 5.

    So many times while watching Season 5 I'd fast forward through things like arguments about the baby and whether he should be breastfed ?? and pause at parts where Silas and Doug were trying to establish their marijuana dispensary, or when Nancy would get back in touch with Guillermo - moments which sadly accounted for a very small slice of the show at that point. Even the acting slows down so much, with Nancy walking around like a zombie with a blank stare and talking at all times in a monotone, SUPER depressed voice (overkill and potential drinking game with regards to the number of times she sighed, wept, or said something along the lines of her world ending in Season 4-5). The giant potential for the plot to grow had me asking at many times through Season 5 - why are the writers doing this? It goes from Nancy using a boyfriend DEA agent to kick out competing drug distributors in order to grow a highly popular strain of marijuana with urban gangsters all while being a mother, to her playing just a mother role and a being on the sidelines of the illegal exciting stuff.

    We as audiences I believe didn't sign on for that, and that's not what the show initially was about. To anyone watching the show for the first time, I'd recommend watching Seasons 1-3 and then lowering your expectations...the show sadly becomes, well, boring.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    when I first time I ever even heard of weeds, I thought it was going to be a ridiculous show about teenage stoners and a show about evading the police. WAS I EVER WRONG! Mary-Louise Parker's character, Nancy, is an unbelievable actress, she makes the show seem extremely real and dramatic. Elizabeth Perkins's character, Celia, you love to hate her, she is pitiful and she always has a new scheme up her sleeve. As for Justin Kirk's character, Andy, oh poor Andy, he always gets the short end of the stick, and you usually feel sorry for him. Who would have thought that Alexander Gould, little nemo, would be such a rebellious, witty, and almost shockingly intelligent aspect to the show. Shane is probably one of my favorite characters. As for Hunter Parrish, Silas, he makes me ever so angry. His lack of intelligence almost makes you want to scream sometimes, but without his knowledge of growing pot, the show wouldn't be the same. I give this show an A+++++++++++. If you don't like it you have something wrong in your head.
  • Weeds has always been full of hyperbole and social commentary via satire. It wasn't always all that insightful but it was clever and cute at the least. Unfortunately it's disdain, detachment from reality and holier than thou attitude often show through the wit. From it's grindingly unaware and sanctimonious title song, to it's hypocrite self centered characters...once the cute wears off, it's hard to give a crap about anything deeper because the surface is so tarnished.

    The ridiculous story lines not only do nothing for the point trying to be made, the absurd unbelievable plots treat the viewer like an idiot :

    Don't like anti-drug laws....so the proponent of said laws is a barely functioning alcoholic whose entire life is a train wreck. How clever. Alcohol is worse than Marijuana...we get it.

    The "War on Terror" sucks.... so the army randomly kills recruits with drone planes apparently driven by Gomer Pyle. To cover up they send in evil teams of black Ops LAWYERS to strong arm witnesses with magic toys that make the most ludicrous James Bond toy look like a calculator watch. I wish I was kidding. If I had to be fair, this is the scene that broke weeds for me. I forgave it's heavy handed idiocy and overlooked it's characters flaws and unrealistic reactions because to be honest...it was funny a lot of the time. I think I would have been much happier to watch them just flat out say "The war on terror is ridiculous, and we have lost respect and trust for the Armed Forces." Thats totally fine...I agree 110%. But a scene that makes Get Smart look realistic and hides behind weak attempts at humor? Cmon...what a joke.

    To top it off, the writers are often too afraid to make the protagonists react in realistic ways for fear of alienating weak minded viewers. Nancy can yell at her bumbling drug addict brother in law, but when her self centered prick of a son nearly gets her killed and essentially forces her into servitude with the local drug dealer by stealing her drugs...she never mentions it. In fact no one even addresses it.

    I want to like the show. Heck a lot of times I do. Mary Lousie Parker is droll and kissably cute...not to mention incredibly versatile in her role. The soundtrack is often pointed and sharp, which is in stark contrast to the ham fisted finger wagging of the actual show. Sadly, 9 times out of 10, I share Weeds outlook on the topics they address. However, the childish and unrealistic way they address them often makes me wish I didn't for fear of association with halfwits.

    In the end it's just hard to tolerate preaching from a show so flawed.
  • brenswee5 February 2022
    Just finished the series and I am so relieved. I don't think I could take any more of the bull that this show was churning out at the end (for the last number of seasons in truth). I can't decide when the shiw jumped the shark. There are too many to choose from.

    Nancy is one of the most self obsessed characters in the history of television. She had no concept of the consequences of her actions.

    Was it worth the ride? No. But at least now I know what all the "fuss" was about back in the day.
  • thejulia28 September 2005
    Good lord, this show is good. It's thought provoking. Really, so many of the decisions made are poor, so many of the characters do fairly rancid things. But you can't help loving them and you can't help loving the plots. I've fallen in love with every member of the Botwin family. This is a smart, very funny, sexy and sophisticated show. I'm not going to summarize anything here because I'm sure people are aware of the premise.

    It sounds like it could be ho-hum, but you must see it- each episode, people are dealing the characters deal with difficult decisions. Sometimes there's deliberation, sometimes there's regret- the show's smart enough where it assumes we know what the "right thing" was that one should have done. Most often, the characters don't do that right thing, and yet we love them, maybe even think "I would have done that." This is a show that basically says, beneath the normalcy, everyone is pushed to the limit in some way. It's no where near as dark as "Twin Peaks," but somehow, without the freakiness/fear, it reminds me of it because it's intelligent and it shows what lies beneath a bit.

    When you watch it, watch out for Shane Botwin who is the Id of the show, and Andy, his grown up version who I personally hate yet am totally charmed by.

    Ah, and yes, the acting is superb.

    Here's hoping it goes to DVD!
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Oh my god! I just watched the season 2 finale and it took everything in me to keep from screaming and waking my family up. With each episode, I have gotten more excited with what was happening and what was coming up. Now that it's over I don't know if I can wait until the next season!! Every storyline comes together at once and then at the next minute, the whole thing explodes then goes black with the credits. Personally, this was THE biggest cliffhanger I've ever seen at the end of an episode, let alone the end of a season.

    Kudos to the show for picking up Zooey Deschanel for the last couple episodes, and obviously the next season. I think she's a great actress and added a lot to the dynamic. The whole Doug-Celia-Celia's husband triangle was a fun distraction from the crap that is going down with the main plot. I only have one question made of three parts: what was the combination to the safe, how did Silas know it, and how did he even know where the house was in the first place? Brilliant! That is all.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    First off, the show is at it's best when it's centered in suburbia. When the show moves outside of Suburbia in Season 4 it starts becoming more hit & miss. The characters & casting are superb throughout the series, but there are some disappointing character departures around Season 4. Conrad specifically was an important character & losing him was detrimental to the series in my opinion. Here are my ratings for each season.

    Season 1 - 8.5 Season 2 - 9 Season 3 - 9.5 Season 4 - 9 Season 5- 8 Season 6 - 7.5 Season 7 - 6.5 Season 8 - 7

    The show is at it's best in the first 5 seasons, when Nancy goes on the lamb the show becomes less entertaining & almost feels like they ran out of ideas & were struggling finding a path forward for the show because of some bad writing decisions. Overall the show is an 8 for me, but the last 3 seasons can be dull & feel like the show has overstayed it's welcome. Nancy starts out as an interesting character but when it's clear that she is selfish & cares more about the thrills of the life of crime than her family, she becomes pretty unlikable for the last few seasons. I found myself rooting for Andy, Silas & Shane to avoid being consumed by her bad decisions because it's clear she isn't going to stop making them. It isn't until Season 8 where Nancy finally makes a decision worth some redemption, but after spending so many season watching her make bad decision after bad decision, it just feels a little tired by that point.
  • I get distracted easily. I drop watching series easily. I stop caring about characters in series easily. Not this time.

    When a series (or a movie) is trying to force something into my mouth I just grab my remote. And almost every modern series does that, mostly because ratings go high after such move.

    Weeds is different. Writers somehow stopped themself from putting any gimmick plots and focused on telling something you can believe in. Then when you believe in the character, and wonderfully played by ML Parker Nancy Botwin is the one to make you care. She is just so natural, like a person that the creator probably met in his real life.

    And when all the unrealistic stuff comes in it's just funny. Soap opera moves are reduced to a appropriate level. Written like somebody really cared to do a good piece of writing, not just to sell it to million of viewers And the theme. Elvis Costello's version rules
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Weeds is a deliciously liberal show, full of witty dialog and wonderful characters. Comedy, pathos, and pushing the envelope. It's interesting that a show like this might have been pretty outrageous at almost any other time, but today it doesn't even rate as controversial. It's gone under the radar of a lot of people, incl. much of the media, it seems. Good. Then maybe it'll be left alone to prosper and grow and bring us more brilliant one-liners, political and otherwise. Being in its second season is a good sign.

    The show has progressed well so far. The first episode was really good, and I was crestfallen when Celia's eldest daughter, Quinn, didn't return. There was a girl with sense enough to rebel against her awful mother. Now we knew she was gonna be okay! But then she gets sent off to Mexico and we never see her again! That's tough. For the next few episodes I worried that the show wouldn't survive this loss. But it did. It had enough crazy and delightful characters for it to keep going full steam ahead, and now, up to episode 5 of season two, it hasn't weakened yet. Some developments are contrived, and not too realistic, but that doesn't matter when the entertainment value is so spectacular. I choose to believe!

    As for Mary-Louise Parker, what can I say? It's definitely and definitively the role of her lifetime. And she's probably the most amazing-looking 42-year-old I ever saw! I hope this show lasts for fifteen seasons. Go, Mary-Lou!

    PS. I don't do weed and don't intend to, but this show has made me more relaxed about it. Not relaxed enough to try it, but mellow enough not to be judgmental about it. That's cool.

    9 out of 10.
  • swordsnare4 January 2023
    Have watched this in entirety a number of times over the years. The most recent watch seemed to have lost its charm that I once held for it. It's entertaining, don't get me wrong. It's a bit of deliberate roller coaster of story.

    ***SPOILER ALERT***

    Nancy Botwin (Mary-Louise Parker) becomes increasingly toxic, narcissistic & entitled throughout the series which gets a bit tiring by its conclusion. It's no wonder her sons are messed up.

    Uncle Andy is the one of the few redeeming characters as a loveable goofball. Unfortunately he simps after Nancy who uses his affection for her to keep him around.
  • When I first watched this show i didn't really know what to expect....I got the first and second season on DVD without ever watching a single episode..And at my surprise it was really good.. "Weeds" is about a widowed mother who's struggling to maintain a good life for her two children..After her husband's unexpected death she found herself without a job,alone with her two children in suburbia (Agrestic) so she made a critical decision and became a "Weed" Dealer. it may seem like a drama but it's not...the show is actually very humorous...the acting is great...Particularly,Mary-Louise Parker plays a memorable part... even tho the series is somewhat short but it was probably a good choice to make so it would not be milked for what it's worth... each episode keeps you pending on a crucial place so you would be anxiously waiting the next episode... Finally i find myself compelled to recommend this show to anyone not looking for your average everyday comedy show...
  • I like "Weeds" for its dark comedy. The first season's jabs at suburban life and Nancy (Mary Louise Parker) juggling that with the lucrative world of drugs had a lot of subtle humour that I enjoyed.

    I enjoyed the characters that they introduced me to. Doug (Kevin Nealon), Dean (Andy Milder), Silas (Hunter Parrish) and Andy (Justin Kirk) all have a vague charisma with underlying comedy that I was drawn to them. I'm a little disgusted by how thin Mary Louise Parker and Elizabeth Perkins are but I can get past that by how well they portray their characters. But this brings me to my biggest problem with the show, these characters are not explored as deeply as they should be. The show is actually all plot and no character development.

    The show gets darker as Nancy gets deeper into the drug world. The comedy is still there but I am frequently squirming in anguish over the situations that she gets herself into.

    I recommend "Weeds" for people who like dark comedy, but it has its faults and can be off-putting, disconcerting and frustrating.
  • This show is so addictive! I have never watched a show that has engrossed me as much as this.

    I really do wish I could watch all the seasons now I hate the suspense!!

    But thats why its addictive!!!

    Mary Louise Parker is perfect for the "suburban wife turned Drug Dealer" role. Simply a must see. There's drama, and comedy, and suspense, and just everything anyone could want from a T.V. series. Its almost like it's real in a sense! I have watched all 6 seasons and it just gets better and better as i go along! Jenji Kohan is a genius!! Superb 10 out of 10 for sure. I really cant wait for season 7!
  • Warning: Spoilers
    If you are like me, you do not start watching a show unless you are going to see it to the end. There will always be that one or two seasons of a series that were not as good as the others but Weeds has been half great, hilarious TV while the other 50% has simply been the result of not ending a show soon enough. What started as a story about a widow whose want to continue a comfortable lifestyle drove her to sell weed has turned into a reduced cast and a poorly written direction. Weeds used to be fast paced, witty, and darkly comical. Now we are in season 6 and most of the characters that made the story funny are no longer a part of it, including Elizabeth Perkins and Romany Malco. The Weeds true fans enjoyed is over and is now a race to see how it ends. To incoming fans of the show, beware of the massive change in story and tempo that takes place in its current five year run. As for us long-time fans, you can't deny that the show is way past its prime. My hope is for an ending that makes these last 2 seasons worth watching.
  • Seasons 1-3 were good Season 4 was garbage Season 5 got a little better Seasons 6-8 were complete garbage and the final 2 episodes felt rushed. They were also really really bad.

    So yeah, only watch seasons 1-3.
An error has occured. Please try again.