Add a Review

  • "The Prophecy: Forsaken" is a step down from "Uprising". The problem is that the movie is just too short. There's no reason for this movie to be 75 minutes. It had some good ideas and scenes but it didn't go anywhere. Kari Wuhrer once again plays Allison. She still has to stop renegade angels from getting the "The Lexicon". This book contains the access to destroy the earth. Jason Scott Lee and Tony Todd play characters who try to stop her.

    Kari Wuhrer does a decent job as Allison. Jason Scott Lee was OK. Tony Todd was fun, but he goes over the top.

    In the end: It could have been way better. It's worth seeing once just to complete the series.

    For more insanity, please visit: comeuppancereviews.com
  • Filmed back-to-back with the last Prophet sequel, this one picks up right where "The Prophecy: Uprising" left off. Kari Wuhrer is still in possession of a mystical book that both angels from heaven and demons from hell want. I found the previous sequel mildly diverting, and Wuhrer is a b-movie actress ("Anaconda" "Beastmaster 2" "G- Men from Hell") who I've always liked, but I found this sequel rather dull. The low- budget film is competently made from a technical standpoint, but the story here wan't all that clever or interesting. No real reason to watch this film unless you feel compelled to watch all five of The Prophecy films. Jason Scott Lee and Tony Todd also appear in the film.
  • This fifth film in the Prphecy series picks up the tale of the secret battles between hell,heaven,and earth caught between them. Allison (kahri Wuhrer) now possesses the Lexicon. An ancient text that can reveal when the Antichrist will appear. But renegade angels are on the hunt for the book. Her only hope may be a mysterious assassin named Dylan (Jason Scott Lee) Alright you guys get the gist of the story well here is what I thought personally I lost interest in this series after the second film....So...some of you may disagree with me...I felt this film was a bit slow and boring the acting was decent enough although I thought that Kahri Wuhrer's character could have been better written but the story fell flat in many spots...I thought that they didn't give you enough details to make this film interesting...one minute of back story at the beginning just wasn't enough to delve me into this story.. Although I did find the brief explanation on the different ranking of Angels interesting....Tony Todd delivers an excellent performance as an evil Angel bent on stopping Armagedon so that the Angels can be gods favorites. I give this film a sad 2 buckets of gore for the boring story the only thing that justifies this film is its decent acting
  • Well, this 5th film continues from the 4th - and parts 4 and 5 has very little to do with the original trilogy.

    This film is a time waster - watch it on TV if it comes on but don't bother renting or buying this one.

    2/10.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    After enjoying Prophecy Uprising, I honestly did not look forward to Forsaken. Uprising left off with a nice open-ended finale that did not need further elaboration. To use a cliché – the gunslinger walks into the sunset, destined to emerge again before his lifetime expires to participate in other gunfights. But do we need to hear about those later battles now that his main story has been told? Can't we just leave the rest as an unspoken truth? Forsaken comes across as the collection of miscellaneous details wrapped up after the main conflict. An epilogue (a 75 minute long epilogue), and not a complete movie – one of the minor skirmishes that go on after the war has ended, if you will. That last dinner roll you take home to snack on later. Pure excess.

    Enter the new villain in pursuit of the Prophet's Lexicon which holds the key to Armageddon – Stark, the seraphim (played by the Candyman, himself, Tony Todd). And let's not forget the henchman, Dylan (Jason Scott Lee), whose introduction pays homage to a previous Prophecy film where Christopher Walken resurrects a human lackey.

    Allison (Kari Wurher) returns as the underused holder of the Lexicon. She exists in Forsaken to run from the newest angelic threats and ask questions. Questions that prompt other characters to deliver exposition. And what about Allison, herself? What about her character exploration? Incidentally, we discover more revelations concerning her through words spoken by Dylan and Stark than we do by following and observing the heroine. Which leads to the question, "Why show the character at all?" From the mouths of others we hear about Allison, but Joel Soisson denies the audience the chance to actually meet her and explore her dilemma. She's the protagonist of the film, and yet she's a stranger.

    And tragically, the material has great potential for a provocative and compelling thriller. Allison flees from angels, and speaks face to face with Lucifer. By protecting the book, she protects the course of events that will lead to Armageddon and billions of suffering souls – she essentially becomes the guardian of the anti-Christ. But nowhere does she audience even catch a glimpse of the scale of Allison's burden or the incredible faith she must wield to go on without questioning her mission. Forsaken dabbles with these questions mostly through Stark's dialogue, but ultimately leaves them hanging. Much how it treats its protagonist, I might add.

    Flipping over to the villains, the seraphim Stark pursues Allison with a desire to eliminate her and claim the Lexicon for his own; however, his status in the angelic hierarchy discourages him from direct intervention. Hence the henchman to actually pull the trigger. It's yet another scenario with potential; however, it feels mundane in this film. Like Dylan is Stark's coffee boy.

    And the nail in the coffin? The circles these characters go in. The dark powers have Allison in her clutches, she has no prayer of escape, and I called Joel Soisson on the bluff. She escapes with help. She walks into a trap. Stark lets her go. Dylan holds her at gunpoint, and I yawned. Speaking of Dylan, he flip flops between reluctantly agreeing to kill her, and reluctantly trying to save her life throughout the entire running time. Stark threatens, but does nothing.

    How do you build suspense when the danger feels whimsical? When forty-five minutes into the film the main character still seems like a stranger? When Dylan leads Allison into the clutches of Stark's angelic minions – the audience should feel betrayed by the character – hold their breath, and climb to the edge of their seat to find out what happens to her and think "this might be it." But as it stands, we cross our arms and correctly predict, "It's got nothing." In closing, the film has great cards; unfortunately, they don't add up to a worthwhile hand. It stands as a number of wonderful possibilities missing the final card to complete itself. At best it can bluff, but it's not good at that either.
  • Alison (Kari Wuhrer) is still being chased by the armies of heaven and hell because of the special manuscript she has in her possession. There's also a highly derivative retarded sub-plot revolving around a hit-man and his disgruntled angel employer (Jason Scott Lee and a sadly wasted Tony Todd, respectively). Watching the previous film "The Prophecy: Uprising" is pretty much a prerequisite before you even attempt to watch this one, as it was in all likelihood one film that was splint in two and both halves padded so the viewer wouldn't feel ripped off. Well guess what? you plan failed, guys. And the Prophecy franchise is going down the way of, well pretty much ANY Dimension film property (Hellraiser, Children of the Corn, Dracula, the Crow, Highlander, etcetera...). Saturation ALWAYS gives way to lower profits and a weaker fan-base. Whereas quantity NEVER equates with quality. Such is this case with this travesty, I thought "Prophecy 2" was the worst of the series. I've been proved wrong, I'll admit it.

    My Grade: F

    Eye Candy: Georgia Nica as Gabrielle gets fully nude
  • troyanov13 September 2005
    what's up with dimension these days ? both their latest franchise installments (the prophecy and hellraiser)are just incredible bad. the previous installment was bad, but watchable thanks to kari wuhrer and shaun pertwee, this one is much worse. i am glad Chris walken left the series.

    why are angels supposed to look like a bunch of retarded bums? ridiculous... what's up with the piece of haut couture accessoire tony Todd wears around his neck? what's up with little girl's teeth? man, i was laughing so loud, i fell off my chair...

    tony Todd and Jason lee are badly miscast. don't get me wrong. tony shines in the remake of the "night of the living dead" and "candyman".

    the guy who plays Satan, although probably the ladies will find him charming, completely lacks dept and maturity, required for his part...

    the story is non-existent. although kari wuhrer is good that does not justify wasting your time...

    please, please dimension, next time hire: 1 capable director, 1 capable script writer and one capable 1 designer. at least...
  • This film picks up exactly where "Prophecy: Uprising" left off. Given the fact that this film is only 1 hour 15 minutes, I'd be willing to place a bet that this was filmed originally with Uprising as one movie. Anyway, Kari Wuhrer now holds the Lexicon, a book that tells who the anti-Christ is and when the apocalypse will take place. Jason Scott Lee is the righteous cop sent by the seraph Stark (Tony "Candyman" Todd)to kill Wuhrer and retrieve the book. Naturally, he cannot do it and the two try to escape the wrath of Stark and his minions. Jon Light returns as Lucifer, who ironically aids the two heroes in their quest. I thought this film was better than "Uprising," but still not great. Casting Tony Todd was a great choice and I liked Lee's explanation of the celestial hierarchy, but I became ultimately confused with who's good and who's bad. Do you help Stark prevent Armageddon, which will result in humans remaining in wormy earth after they die yet save billions of lives? Do you help Lucifer bring about Armageddon, which will result in good people being reunited with God in Heaven yet end life on this planet as we know it? God seems to want it to happen as does Lucifer. I guess the majority rules. I don't know, you figure it out for yourselves.
  • Uriah4319 July 2014
    This movie begins with a brief flashback to the previous film in which "Father Constantin" (Boris Petroff) finds a long lost Biblical book which is called "The Lexicon". While he reads the book the prophecy of the end times begins to mysteriously appear and reveals the exact name of the anti-Christ before he assumes world domination. Realizing the importance of this book the angels loyal to God have placed a unique woman named "Allison" (Kari Wuhrer) in charge of protecting it from the rebellious angels led by "Stark" (Tony Todd) who want to prevent Armageddon because it would destroy the humans they hate so much. If that doesn't quite make sense I should also add that "Satan" (John Light) also wants to keep the book out of Stark's hands because he wants Armageddon to happen even though according to Revelation it means his end is at hand and he will soon be thrown into a lake of fire. Throw in an assassin named "Dylan" (Jason Scott Lee) who shoots himself in the head rather than kill Allison--and then goes about trying to kill Allison--and you can pretty much understand that this movie is a jumbled mess which makes no sense at all. That said, I recommend this film only to those who have seen and enjoyed the previous 4 movies in the series. Otherwise, I wouldn't bother with it. Below average.
  • In Bucharest, Allison (Kari Wuhrer) is protecting the mysterious bible, "The Prophet Lexicon", where the last chapter about the apocalypse, called Revelations, discloses the name of the Antichrist in its last page. Meanwhile, the evil and jealous leader of the renegade angels Thrones, Stark (Tony Todd), forces the hit-man Dylan (Jason Scott Lee) to kill Allison to get the information about the Antichrist, but Dylan mysteriously feels attracted by the woman, protecting her against the Thrones. Allison seeks John Reigart (John Light) for help, but Satan tell her that he is interested in the apocalypse to gather millions of souls to Hell. Alone and betrayed, Allison discloses the truth about her origins, while protecting the Lexicon.

    "The Prophecy: Forsaken" is a reasonable sequel of "The Prophecy: Upraising", but could be better and better. The story gives a perfect sequence to "Upraising", but it is too brief with only 75 minutes running time. There are good ideas that are not well explored or developed, like for example the story of Allison's parents, and indeed I was quite disappointed with the weak and confused conclusion of this good series about the war of angels. My vote is six.

    Title (Brazil): "Profecia - Renegados" ("Prophecy - Renegades")
  • Warning: Spoilers
    In this series, the less of Christopher Walken you get on screen, the worse the movie gets. It's just maybe a coincidence, but Christopher Walken knew when to withdraw from the series. Also adding naked chicks doesn't do the franchise any favors - when you see sex or nudity in a metaphysical movie, most of the time it just desperately tries to get the viewer's attention. This is a great example.
  • They were made back to back and are basically one story. Just told in two parts. One of the things I like about the post Christopher Walkin Prophecy movies is that they are not a replica of every other Stephen King inspired "Devil in our back yard" movies. I'm not saying that is bad. Its just over done. The antichrist is always in a medium sized American suburb with nice normal middle class parents. Its nice to see a more global perspective. Not everything happens in middle class America. The underlying question of these movies is whether there can be such a thing as blind faith. The devil puts it best by saying you always have to ask why. The movie is cool. It is spooky in a way. But it will not scare you. It isn't trying to. So if you are looking fora horror film this is not for you. I would still suggest you see it, just to realize that the subject of revelations isn't just there to scare us. It can inspire us too.
  • So the crew were already in Eastern Europe, so why not bust out another unnecessary sequel? Prophecy 5: Still flogging a dead horse! This one flips the bad Angel, now Tony Todd as Stark who is tall, skinny and more imposing, though he allows (orders) his undead human lackey Dylan (Jason Lee) to do most of the leg work.

    Allison remains on the run in a disguise that makes her look like a 40 years older Kim Cattrall - that would have her at around 40 - Stark and the naughty angels are still after the book, Allison still hears voices and they still end up at the same mysterious house where they can all share visions and flashbacks, the same ones that padded out 4.

    Same as the first 4 films now, Armageddon is looming. Some want it. Some don't. And some poor humans are stuck in the middle of it to be unwilling pawns in the action because of whatever tenuous reason the writers can conjure.

    It must be said that it is not the acting that does in these two films, Jason Lee, Sean Pertwee, Tony Todd and Kari Wuhrer do the best they can to not just throw up their hands and exclaim "Didn't I just say that exact same thing in the last scene? And the one before that? And the..." The filmmaker obviously didn't have the budget, hence the location, dodgy CGI, the doubling up of meaningless dialogue and the flashbacks upon flashbacks. They didn't even use the Angel's abilities much, no superhero stuff at all here. Which all brings me back to my original rhetorical question: WHY TWO FILMS? The two films could easily have been condensed into one 100 minute flick that still wouldn't have been awe-inspiring, but would have been far less disappointing than the dull replica that picks from all of the first three films without retaining any of the truly cool - not always expensive - parts.

    Final rating - 5 / 10. Not terrible, but definitely not good, merely a product that justified the release of a couple DVDs and perhaps put some actors' kids through another year of school.
  • Having seen all of the The Prophecy movies now, I still don't understand what the movies are all about. They are so messy and confusingly written. It's the reason why I've never cared about any of the movies out of the series.

    It's so hard to tell who is fighting who in these movies and more importantly why. Characters keep changing sides and motives and the movie just never seem to be able to reach a satisfying closure. Basically all of the movies end with an open ending, that doesn't quite wrap all things up, including this picture, that as of yet is still the last one out of the series.

    I just totally lost interest in this movie from the first couple of minutes on. I couldn't care or understand what was going on all and what the entire purpose of it all was. This is just simply a very poorly constructed movie.

    I really can't see how anyone could ever like watching this.

    4/10

    http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/
  • This fifth movie in "The Prophecy" saga wasn't actually as bad as I had expected it to be, given the generic outcome of the fourth movie.

    Sure, the Gabriel character is still missing from the franchise as is actor Christopher Walken, and the franchise just isn't fully the same without him in the Gabriel role.

    "The Prophecy: Forsaken" was actually a good continuation of the storyline presented in the fourth movie, and it made more coherent sense and had a more thoroughly planned plot to it.

    Again, as it has been throughout all the movies in "The Prophecy" franchise, then they have a good ensemble of actors and actresses on the cast list. It was nice to see Kari Wuhrer return to the role of Allison. The movie also boasts the likes of horror icon Tony Todd and I was genuinely surprised to see Jason Scott Lee in a movie such as this.

    This movie doesn't stand well on its own in terms of being a stand-alone movie, because you definitely need some prior knowledge of the storyline and characters to fully grasp and appreciate what is happening throughout the course of "The Prophecy: Forsaken".

    All in all, "The Prophecy: Forsaken" turned out better than I had initially anticipated. However, it is hardly a movie that warrants more than a single viewing.
  • It was a very disappointing film. I was curious to see how the story would play out after Uprising. Unfortunately it was tired and predictable with some VERY cheesy one liners. This movie felt more like an after thought instead of a well fleshed out follow up to Uprising. The war between angels doesn't seem to have progressed at all from the first film and I find that annoying and quite frankly weak writing. Where Uprising had some good back and forth between characters and some really creepy and gross moments, Forsaken has none. Except for the opening sequence with John Light, which would make any parent's skin crawl. In fact, the only bright spot is John Light's performance. He makes the most of every moment on screen and elevates every scene he is in. Maybe if he had been in every scene in the film I would have enjoyed it more, as it is I feel his performance was wasted on this movie. On the upside I am now a John Light fan and want to see more of HIS work.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    In this second and final episode of the Prophecy "homage", all the confusion and blanks spots from "Uprising" are filled in. When you realize that both films were released in 2005, and went straight to video, you have to wonder if Soisson was doing all this to fluff up his resume. The first ten minutes are the same footage from the first film, so our next actions are in the middle of things, and Satan is once again walking to and fro about the earth, causing trouble. The cast now includes the excellent Jason Scott Lee as Dylan, the reluctant hit man trying to protect Kari Wuhrer, and the exceptional Tony Todd, an often underestimated character actor who shines in this performance. Overall, the film moves well, and the action is much smoother in this second installment. But one question comes to mind. If Allison is a Nephalim, why would she still have a scar on her cheek? In the third Prophecy film, the Nephalim was said to have spontaneous tissue regeneration, so the scar should have healed years ago. Okay, okay, I'm nit picking, but let's face it, if you can't point out the obvious errors, where is the fun in that? Rated R for violence, language and a semi amusing scene of nudity with a young lady whose film credits include ONE film...this one. Collectible? Hardly, unless you are a fanatic Prophecy fan.
  • FORSAKEN is the follow-up to UPRISING, two straight-to-video PROPHECY sequels shot back to back in Eastern Europe. It's as dismal and dull as the previous movie, with the female survivor returning with her holy textbook once more to be pursued by various demons and angels. Tony Todd steps in to take over from Doug Bradley as the big bad and he's a more than welcome presence (as always), but even the big man can breathe no life into what is a plodding and uninteresting movie. Jason Scott Lee shows up too but is given very little to do other than be menaced, and the others might as well have stayed at home.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Following the events of The Prophecy: Uprising, Allison (Kari Wuhrer) continues his mission of protecting the book that writes itself, the Lexicon, as it predicts the war in Heaven and the name of the Antichrist.

    Now, Stark (Tony Todd) is leading renegade angels called Thrones to get the book while Allison is assisted by Dylan (Jason Scott Lee, who played Bruce Lee in Dragon: The Bruce Lee Story), a killer who decides to not kill her and keep her safe.

    Filmed at the same time as the last movie in Bucharest, Romania by director and writer Joel Soisson who would soon make a trilogy of Dracula movies for Dimension - also with Lee - the fifth Prophecy film is better than you'd think and if you miss Christopher Walken, at least you can appreciate the world-building and mythology that gets carried across five movies.

    Compare that to how Hellraiser got treated and come back to these movies and let me know what you think.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    "The Prophecy: Forsaken" is a decent and entirely unspectacular conclusion to the series.

    **SPOILERS**

    Sent out on a job, Dylan, (Jason Scott Lee) can't bear to murder Allison, (Kari Wuhrer) who still holds the fabled book, and decides to shield her from his employer, Stark, (Tony Todd) a jealous angel, and his minions. While on the run, she again meets up with John Reigart, (John Light) to figure out who's after her, but offers no help. Hiding out until he can rejoin her, she is soon captured by Stark's minions and told of his job to eliminate Allison. Thinking this will allow Stark, who wants to stop the Antichrist from arriving, to find the Lexicon without her getting in the way, and that she may herself have a more prominent role in both parties than she realized, she fights off both to protect herself and the fate of humanity.

    The Good News: This was a mildly decent entry in the series. As a continuation of the one before it, there's a sense of continuity that is nice to see. With the same themes being brought up and several of the same people and places, it doesn't offer much and being a straight sequel, that's a really pleasing factor to have. It's one really impressive sequence is a short scene where one character is chased into a small church, and as night falls, the spirit of a deceased victim appears to them, only hidden by the shadows of the dark. While delivering a really creepy message, they light shines only briefly on the figure, making it apparent for several quick flashes that it's an otherworldly force and turns out to be quite creepy. This alone makes the film watchable. The last main positive point is that terrifically gloomy Romanian locale in the film. It adds a Gothic flavor that just can't be matched anywhere else, with it's Medieval-style houses, dark atmosphere and just it's wasteland feel to it. Most of the atmosphere and feel in the film comes from this. Otherwise, this was a really lackluster film.

    The Bad News: This was a really weak and uneven entry. Most of the problem is primarily due to the repetitive nature of what's going on. Far too much time is spent explaining everything that happened in the last movie, and this can really make it seem like there's really not much we haven't already seen. The almost airy and aimless half-bag of religious psycho-babble delivered here also feels like the exact same "mystical book" mumbo-jumbo that populated the last entry. Some of the rules get explained a little further, but it takes it's cues from the one before it, and really doesn't feel like it's own sequel. Rather, there's an air about it being the exact same as before, and this is a really irritating and tiring concept, since it was a boring and excruciating point in that one as well. These non-stop talking scenes go on forever, don't really end on anything useful rather than confusing the viewer, and no attempt is made to work them into the film naturally beyond the explanations. The last major problem is the short running time. With most of the time taken up with the dialog and explanations, there isn't any time for any action or anything else. It's still watchable, but there's a sense that it feels like this could've had some more action and chasing thrown in to make it more exciting. Beyond the one church scene and a half-way decent roof-top encounter near the end, that's it in terms of exciting action in the film. This can seem boring in some ways, and really could've been fixed quite easily. With a few small, simple problems, this could've been a slightly better entry.

    The Final Verdict: While still keeping the entertainment factor high, this is a just about fully-talkative film that offers a few action sequences to lighten the mood. It's fine and watchable, but the only real reason to see this one is to either finish off the series or because you've seen part four. Otherwise, you can skip it without missing anything at all.

    Rated R: Graphic Violence, Full Nudity and Language
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Enjoyed the movie immensely. Too short. It seems like there could have been more depth to the conflict between Tony Todd's character and Kari Wuhrer's. Wished the film had Walken and Viggo Mortensen but Tony Todd and John Light were great alternative choices. I'm not sure how Simon really fits into the story. Is he the same Simon from the original film? I was intrigued by the notion of Allison being a nephalim (and Simon her father?) but wanted to know more. I liked the dark and ambiguous ending. Most of all, the series left me wanting more. Which for me is a good thing. Especially at a time when everyone is trying to interpret the Bible to justify their own destructive ambitions (won't mention any names here). Hope there are more Prophecy movies to come.
  • Allison (Kari Wuhrer), the new guardian to the ancient manuscript, continues to try to protect it from another group of renegade angels bent on bringing on the end of the world.

    Many have faulted Dimension for milking their franchises. And yes, it is true. This film was sort of pumped out quickly and done in Romania to cut costs. But look at what they were able to get even for this direct-to-video release: Beyond Kari Wuhrer, we have Tony Todd's incredible voice narrating, the impeccable Jason London, and Joseph LoDuca (a Sam Raimi veteran) doing the score. These are some of the finest names you could ask to appear in a horror film at the time. Sure, we would all love to see a Christopher Walken cameo, but that just is not going to happen.

    And the scenery? Wow. There is something about Europe that American sets just cannot recreate. I can understand why Charles Band abuses his Italian landscape (and he should probably do it even more than he already does).