Add a Review

  • Something I often find bothersome in 'time travel fiction' is that there is usually a large chunk of the storytelling dedicated to the tedium of explaining 'how' time travel works, particularly when time travel is merely a device to aid the storytelling. We don't really need to know the science behind it because, simply put, science can neither logically explain its paradoxical nature, nor prove or dispute its possibility. "The Time Traveler's Wife" never makes pretenses to the science behind it, rather it centers its focus on the story.

    At the heart of this film is a love story and the complexities that people bring to their relationships. What I liked most was its metaphorical allusion to the distance in relationships and how the important people in our lives stay with us even after they are gone. The scenes between Henry and young Clare were especially moving because they took literally the notion of feeling like you have known someone your whole life. It's kind of like when you share stories from your past with friends and significant others, retelling them time and again until your experiences are indistinguishable from theirs, except in the case of Henry and Clare, the experiences are real if not linear.

    Just go and watch it. Decide for yourself if you like it. Just don't dwell too much on the technicalities. After all, Scientific Theorists have been slamming their heads against the wall on the matter of time travel for centuries. Take the story for what it is and enjoy the ride.
  • Well, I am shocked and surprised. I had written this movie off as a "chick flick" and was dragged to see this by my wife as it her was her choice this week. I am glad that I went. Throughout the whole film, I was kept entertained and wanting to see the next development. Personally, I enjoyed the combination of lead actor and actress.

    The concept of the film had echoes to that of Momento or The Butterfly Effect but equally different on its own merits.

    The combination of characters is touching and you can really relate to this heartbreaking story.

    I cried towards the ending of this film (its not a surprise, when a story gets me, I have to show emotion!)
  • This was much better than expected. The premise seemed far-fetched, to put it mildly. But the movie worked on a number of different levels based on the screenplay, directing, beautiful cinematography, and acting, not just of the always captivating Rachel McAdams, but also the much underrated Eric Bana as the co-lead, and the rest of the supporting cast.

    The basic plot is Eric Bana (Henry) is afflicted with being involuntarily sent through time. He has no control about the time or places where he is sent. At some point, he meets with Rachel McAdams (Clare), drops in and out of her life, they fall in love and marry. However, as one can easily imagine, the downsides of involuntary time travel takes its toll. The movie could have easily have spun out of control and ended up a total mess, but the movie actually works quite nicely.

    The plot could be a collaborative effort of the late Rod Serling (of Twilight Zone fame) with bizarre, science fiction type plots and Nicholas Sparks, the author of countless sticky sweet love stories (i.e. – "The Notebook").

    I liked this movie, but I realize this might not be everybody's cup of tea. I would say stick with it & you'll be glad you didn't give up & go see "Halloween II" across the hall (as I was tempted to do). I've seen them both. Believe me when I say "Time Traveler" is the better of the two.
  • Rachel McAdams and Eric Bana star in "The Time Traveler's Wife," from 2009. Directed by Robert Schwentke and based on the novel by Audrey Niffenegger, it tells the story of Henry DeTamble.

    Henry (Eric Bana) works as a special collections librarian. He has an anomaly he was born with which allows him to travel in time. He never knows when or where he's going.

    When Clare Abshire meets him, she invites him to dinner -- she has been in love with him since she was six years old. He finds out that he visited her often when she was a child. They fall in love and marry.

    It turns out that being married to a time traveler isn't all it's cracked up to be. Henry always leaves unexpectedly and sometimes is gone for a while, and it can happen at any time.

    Good movie, with wonderful performances by both leads, who have good chemistry. Rachel McAdams to me is scarily like Jennifer Garner. She's lovely and sympathetic as Clare, and Bana, a fine actor, is very effective as Henry, whose visits to the future don't always make him comfortable.

    Depending on your mood, this bittersweet story can be a real tear- jerker. It got to me and I cried, I admit it.

    I think the tale says that we have to deal with what we're given, even if it's not always convenient. We are not always the masters of our abilities.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    8 times and counting. That's how many times I've read the book. The episodic structure of the novel is such that it's easy to dip in and out of, even if you're reading other things. You can quite easily spend an hour or a day with Henry and Claire whenever you wish.

    When I found out that they were making a movie of the book, my initial reaction was how? There's far too much to cram into a two hour movie. Surely they'd be better making a mini- series?

    The fact is, that they leave a lot of things out of the movie. Characters who you'd assume would be quite important are given very little screen time, or excised completely. Also, the ending of the novel isn't used, only the spirit of the ending. The book's ending was filmed, however, so maybe it'll turn up as a DVD extra for all the purists out there.

    You know what though? The movie is great. It's perfectly cast, and instead of concentrating on every minute detail that made the book a joy to read, it concentrates solely on the boy- meets-girl-out-of-time concept, and plays out a love story over an evening-sized slice of time.

    Lots of people have complained that their favourite part from the book isn't in it (Rachel's disastrous first date with another man and Henry's revenge for it, The Gomez situation, Ingrid, Christmas at Meadowlark etc) but really, there is enough in this movie to sustain it and to give any newcomers to the story a decent enough reason to run off and read the book to fill in the blanks. Those people especially are in for a treat, as while the movie does have it's moments of high drama, there is a noticeable lack of darkness, which the book has in spades. Also kudos must go to Bruce Joel Rubin for the writing of a brand new scene featuring a time travelling Henry and his mother on a subway train, which slotted in perfectly to the TTW world.

    Rachel McAdams makes a stunning Claire, her scenes revolving around the pregnancy issues they have are completely believable and heartfelt. Early reports suggested Eric Bana wasn't up to snuff in his performance of Henry. I can only assume those reviewers had been watching a very rough cut, as I thought he was fantastic. Special mention also to Arliss Howard as Henry's dad, and Stephen Tobolowsky as Kendrick, who both go to demonstrate how scenes can be stolen with very limited screen time.

    For everyone who's going in expecting the book, lower your expectations. It isn't the book. What it is, is a condensed version of the main love story from the book, played out perfectly with respect for the text. I enjoyed the movie immensely, and am looking forward to seeing it again. If I want the book, I'll read the book. My imagination is perfectly capable of providing me with the visuals I need. However, from now on, if I want to spend the evening with the DeTambles and let someone else do the work, I'll be watching the movie.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    If you thought that "The Curious Case of Benjamin Button" starring Mr. Benjamin Bratt taught you a lot about life and love, then hold on. There is something else coming your way, and it's name is "The Time Traveler's Wife." The lovely Canadian starlet, Miss Rachel McAdam, turns in a powerhouse performance as a young lady who learns about the value of standing by the man you love, even though sometimes he is 45 years old when you're 12 years old, and sometimes he disappears inexplicably and then shows up naked when you least expect it. Talk about popping in unannounced! Maybe you think it's stupid that this lady planned a large wedding in front of tons of people, knowing full well that her beloved Eric Bana could disappear at any moment, leaving her with the catering bill that as you can imagine came to quite a hefty fee. But as for myself, I find it appealing and devil-may-care. "The Time Traveler's Wife" is a valuable lesson about life, love and second chances, if by second chances you mean that this guy shows up multiple times in the nude and tells you that he loves you. It's a realistic portrayal of love and relationships in today's world, and I think we all stand to learn a lesson.
  • In Chicago, the special collections librarian Henry DeTamble (Eric Bana) has a genetic anomaly that allows him to travel in time; however, he is not able to control the moment or the destiny of his voyages. When the stranger Clare Abshire (Rachel McAdams) meets him in the library, she invites him to have dinner with her in his favorite restaurant Beau Thai where she confesses that she has been in love with him since she was six years old. Henry leans that he had visited her many times in the real state of her parents and he falls in love with her. Sooner they get married, but the life of Clare becomes troubled with the successive unexpected travels of her beloved husband.

    "The Time Traveler's Wife" is a delightful love story with an original romance of a time traveler that wins the heart of his wife when she was six years old and he was older. Therefore he does not know her in the present time. The chemistry between Eric Bana and Rachel McAdams is wonderful and makes their love absolutely believable. However, the girl Brooklynn Proulx steals the movie with a marvelous performance. My vote is seven.

    Title (Brazil): "Te Amarei Para Sempre" ("I Will Love You Forever")
  • I was a massive fan of the book and had been following the production of this movie for a long time anticipating the release date. I had set my expectations pretty low so as to not be disappointed and decided to just enjoy the film for what it was.

    I was overjoyed by how true to the book the film stayed, only varying in a few unimportant places, the film dared to be as heart breaking and sad as the book and did not feel the need to justify the logistics of the time travel instead choosing to summarise it in the first scene.(People who feel this was not explained do not have the imagination needed to fully enjoy this film).

    The ageing of Eric Bana's character was seamless and it was easy to tell whether he was a younger or older version of Henry and Rachel McAdams brought out the inner frustrations of Claire's character with a great sensitivity showing the difficulties of the relationship.

    Overall, this film was not a let down to a lover of the book, I enjoyed it as an extension of the story of Henry and Claire and found the emotions real and well developed. A definite must-see for all fans and those who haven't read the book but who just enjoy a good love story!
  • As a stand-alone creature, *The Time Traveler's Wife* is a nice love story about a nice couple struggling with an unusual difficulty. The actors do a fine job with the material they were given, but unfortunately, what they were given was a pale shadow of the original tale. The original tale was fleshed out with much stronger plot points, subtexts and symbolism, with supporting characters who had a real role to play in the progression of the plot. Several of these have been jettisoned completely, others are there for reasons that really make no sense other than to be "couple friends." (For example, the character crucial to the ending in the book is only alluded to and not in the context of the ending.) The whole reason for the ending was completely glossed over (to say more gives away an important novel plot point), the intensity of the struggles the couple faces are barely evident, and their motivations (driven by some of those very same supporting characters) are unclear. Obviously one can only fit so much of such a dense work into a two-hour feature, but there are other ways this could be done without making the story a superficial shadow of its former self. Hour-long TV dramas do a better job of providing this kind of writing, characterization, and directing (even those that are not serialized). Furthermore, while the novel gives us a range of characters with whom to identify in a very complex and surreal conceit, the movie only gives us the central two characters, which means if you don't identify with them, you're not going to enjoy the movie. On the other hand, if you do, and if you haven't read the novel, you may enjoy the story as a superficial love story with a clichéd ending. Novel lovers, beware, a key scene, the one that ties everything together at the end of the story, is completely missing, and that was, to me, the greatest loss, as it actually went to the heart of the love story itself.
  • The Time Traveler's Wife is a romantic drama directed by Robert Schwentke, adapted from Audrey Niffenegger's bestseller of the same name. Adapting a novel with complex elements and undertones to the silver screen is a daunting task and director Robert Schwentke struggled to compromise between satisfying readers of the novel and making the movie accessible to people unfamiliar with the book. Overall, the movie has some significant directing and screen writing flaws but does make for an unpretentious and above-average romantic tragedy thanks to its two compelling leads.

    Sypnosis: The Time Traveler's Wife is the time-defying love story of Henry DeTamble (Eric Bana) and Clare Abshire (Rachel McAdams). Henry is a librarian afflicted with a genetic disease that causes him to travel through time more or less randomly. Henry's random and unpredictable escapades are often dangerous, terrifying and sometimes life-threatening ordeals because he ends up buck-naked and starving in unknown places and times. For those reasons, Henry keeps himself in top physical shape and taught "himself" all type of survival skills such as pick-pocketing, street fighting, or picking locks. After a random while, he always goes back to his "present" but is largely unable to affect his future. At age 28, he meets 20-yr old Clare Abshire. He doesn't know her but she has known him since she was 6 and has been waiting for him all her life and will do so the rest of her life...

    The main weaknesses of the movie can be traced back to trying to fit the book into 107 minutes. Director Robert Schwentke and screenwriter Bruce Joel Rubin appeared a bit over-matched and took the path of least resistance, oversimplifying the plot and characters. The book was a bit confusing at times because of its particular narrative structure and the movie inherits the same problem. Screenwriter Bruce Joel Rubin made some compromises to keep the movie from becoming excessively long or inaccessible to its PG-13 audience. The main events and characters of the book were translated to the big screen although non-essential characters such as Kimi or Ingrid were completely omitted and the ending was slightly altered (and I liked it). The supporting characters are a mere passing thoughts, the key relationship between Clare and Gomez is one-dimensional. Even the two main characters, Henry and Clare, are under-developed. Ideally, the direction of the movie should have been given to a director with better credentials, and the movie extended up to 140 minutes to develop the characters fully and take advantage of the terrific cast.

    Despite those shortcomings, The Time Traveler's Wife is one of those movies you can't help but like. It is at heart a simple star-crossed love story with a refreshing sci-fi twist that touches on universal themes such as fate/free will, true love, and loss. A story that focused on the depth of the characters' love, not its showiness. Their will to move forward and enjoy every minute they have with each other before Henry's impending fate. This meant more close-up shots and a deeper and more realistic exploration of what it means to be Henry and Clare. The movie succeeds in moving the audience thanks in big part to moving performances from the two leads, who surrendered themselves fully to the premise of the novel.

    The Time Traveler's Wife features the graceful Rachel McAdams as the title character. Most will have missed her terrific performance in the 2008 indie the Lucky Ones and this puts her back on the radar for mainstream audiences. Beside matching the description of Clare in the book, McAdams has an unusual ability to make her characters feel real against all odds. Overcoming an underwritten character, she carries the emotional weight of the movie and was luminous portraying Clare's spirit and unyielding love for Henry's despite being riddled with some terrible lines once again. Will someone give Rachel McAdams a meatier role for God's sake??? Eric Bana was a big surprise, exceeding my expectations and making for a very solid Henry. Although he does not fit the physical description of the book (Henry is more runner than football player) Bana's Henry was tormented, introverted, poignant, and more importantly, had considerable chemistry with his co-star. The only issue I had was that Henry was mostly a one-note character. The supporting cast was solid albeit given very little opportunity to be memorable. Gomez (Ron Livingstone) was a pivotal character in the book but merely a passing thought in the movie. Jane McLean as Charisse, Arliss Howard as Henry's father, Stephen Tobolowsky as Dr. Kendrick all did a fine job with the small parts they had.

    The cinematography has a beautiful stark and cold quality to it which reinforce the tragic nature of the movie. The movie was beautifully shot by Florian Ballhaus and is the strongest attribute of the movie behind its leads. The crafty camera-work using motion and placement selection gave a particular tone to his scenes and Schwentke used that to his advantage in the film, giving the movie a light touch of fantasy. He created a nice immersing atmosphere that really highlighted Clare and Henry's impending fate. The CGI effects of Henry's time traveling are unspectacular but first rate while the overused musical score was melancholic, adding to the tragic tone of the movie.

    Enjoy the Time Traveler's Wife for what it is: an endearing love story with an unusual sci-fi premise. It may not be exactly like the book, it may have been darker and heavier on the sci-fi, and it may have been so much more with better direction. Even so, the premise of the story, and the perfectly-cast leads make this movie well-worth the ride and will keep your imagination lingering long afterward.

    B+: Boasting terrific performances and chemistry from Rachel McAdams and Eric Bana, the Time Traveler's Wife has some flaws but is a charming, endearing and bittersweet romantic drama nonetheless.

    http://anomalousmaterial.blogspot.com/
  • A young woman (Rachel McAdams) meets a man in a Chicago library (Eric Bana) and recognizes him as the man she loves who has traveled back in time from his future to meet her as a girl. Can their relationship handle the stress of him suddenly disappearing without warning and the complications thereof?

    "The Time Traveler's Wife" (2009) is a drama/romance with a sci-fi element comparable to "Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind" (2004). Like that film, it can be mind-boggling, but both Bana and McAdams make it worthwhile and there are thought-provoking & moving parts. Eric is masculine and charismatic here, really showing off his talents, while Rachel shines as one of the most uniquely beautiful women to walk the earth. Also check her out in the underrated "The Lucky Ones" (2008).

    The ending shows that the real problem in America is old, white, gun-toting Republicans. (rolling my eyes). Now we're talking fantasy.

    The film runs 1 hour, 47 minutes, and was shot in Toronto, Hamilton & Chalk Lake, Ontario, Canada, with establishing shots of Chicago.

    GRADE: B-/B
  • The Time Traveler's Wife is based off of one of the best books I've read in recent years. Naturally, the movie couldn't come close to catching all the little details that made the book so captivating, since like any other film it had a limited time frame he had to work with. However, the Hollywood adaptation (with Eric Bana and Rachel McAdams as the lead rolls) did do one thing right: it captured the heart of the novel and transferred much of the book's atmosphere to the big screen. Now, as much as I've always hated those original-material purists who nitpick on every little detail in a given adaptation, I have to say the work done on The Time Traveler's Wife was extraordinary loyal in spirit to the film.

    Hollywood and director Robert Schwentke deserve a big kudos for not messing this one up, and for creating a big screen experience that welcomes those who loved the novel as well as newcomers to this tragic-romantic story.

    I gave it 9 out of 10.
  • I rated it a 7, but actually think it's a bit shy of that. I read the book years ago, long enough to forget a lot. But, I remember the book as having much more action-oriented scenes and drama. Thus, more of a balance of sentimental and exciting scenes. I found the movie started dragging about 2/3s of the way through, but picked up a lot at the end.

    I was ~very~ impressed with the casting of the young Clair. Between, the two Claires, they managed to capture the same look and nuance of expression. I was also very impressed with the casting and performances of the younger and older Alba. The girls did a terrific job with their roles.
  • Hoping for a sweeping saga on love's ability to transcend dimensions a la "Ghost" or "The Lake House," "The Time Traveler's Wife," Robert Schwentke's melodrama achieves neither the grandness it aspires for nor (at least) a constant sense of giddiness for its leads Eric Bana and Rachel McAdams. Strange actually, as whereas Bana plays a man who constantly finds himself involuntarily traveling through time, Schwentke's soppy romance -- as with its leading man -- remains flat and inert.

    At the age of six, Henry (Bana) first finds about his condition during a car accident that killed his mom, which becomes a regular tendency leading to his first meeting with Clare, she still being a six-year old child and he a young adult. Such regular visits lead to a romance and, eventually, marriage, as Schwentke's adaptation Audrey Niffenegger's bestselling novel charts the complications of the couple's relationships regarding Henry's curious condition, though its decision to never bother to explore its cause or nature except for cursory prattle on genetics lead to an unconvincing fantasy-cum-love story that partly keeps one from being fully absorbed.

    Yet far more deflating the script's purpose of emotional investment is the lack of distinct personality for its characters, a deficiency which Bana and McAdams try so hard to make up for with their attractiveness and chemistry, but unfortunately proves too considerable to overcome: Henry never comes off more than a vanilla leading man and Clare a callow wife. Schwentke eventually relies on laying the dramatics on the thick with golden hour cinematography, syrupy lines and overdone score; though it's a prefabricated ploy designed to maximize sentimentality but which doesn't propel an otherwise novel idea to motion.
  • Vincentiu5 November 2011
    A powerful movie. Strong, delicate, romantic, strange, seductive, slice of fairy-tale, love story and description of fight, memento mori and family film, travel between feelings and hours and game of destiny. A movie without definitions or verdicts. Only a story about a car accident and its result. About pain and nuances of touch, about refuges and escapes.And the essence is science of director to give not only a good novel in a beautiful skin but occasion to reflect at your time - its price, its crumbs, its forms behind order, possibility to change small things and build a existence together with the perfect person. It is not an exception or unique. In many ways, everyone was part, public or piece of a kind of this metaphor but in this case is showed the seed. Like promise of grow up of every dream. As a tree . With tasty strange fruits.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    The movie is actually pretty good. It is flawed, yes, but manages to say in one hour and a half all that the book sort of managed in 500+ pages. But of course, you might say, it's not fair to compare the book to the movie, and I guess it really isn't. Although I'm beginning to see why some people call Eric Bana's acting abilities into question, he, Rachel McAdams (Clare), and Hailey McCann (Alba) actually managed to pull off a pretty convincing portrait of a loving family. As to those who gripe about the lack of scientific explanations (why exactly DOES he time travel again?) I completely agree with you--I am more a sci-fi fan than a romance/drama, but we have to remember that the film isn't SUPPOSED to be sci-fi. The time-traveling should be seen more as the metaphorical obstacle which tests the couple's love and proves WHY we should give a damn as to whether or not they deserve a happy ending. That's how good storytelling works. As for the movie's ending--I loved it. It was uplifting and bittersweet, but you got the impression that Clare and Alba would manage on their own. Clare has more of a backbone in the movie; she doesn't in the book (yes, yes, I know. I promised I wouldn't compare the book/movie). But by the final scene of the movie, I was convinced that this couple proved that they loved each other. It's a movie. That's all there is. Much better than the book's ending, where she brainlessly waits for him until she's 80 after his death. Ugh. Now THAT was depressing!
  • "The Time Traveler's Wife" is a heart-warming love story, and will keep you entertained until the final credits appear. The performances are superb, the pacing is fantastic, and the emotional sensation you experience is easily worth the price of admission.

    I recommend anyone looking for a unique love story to see this film. Paying homage to memorable classic such as; "Somewhere in Time" and "It's a Wonderful Life,"it will easily be something that should find a home in your living room shelves.

    It emits a cinematic glow that hasn't been seen in years while cleverly conveying an educational message;

    "Never let go of the one you love, and cherish him/her always."

    Don't let this sparkling gem pass you by...
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Henry (Eric Bana) meets Clare (Rachel McAdams) in a library in Chicago as they both know that he has a genetic disorder that causes him to time travel, but she knows much more than that about him as she has met him many times before. He has not yet been to the times and places where they have met before. He then falls in love with her, as she was already in love with him since she was six years old. His continuous absences with time traveling and returning knowing more and more about their future, makes their relationship very challenging. The continuous absence also worries Clare more and more every day as she fells alone in their marriage and their life together.

    The theme in this movie is about love and the challenges that one has to face with this emotion and also can be about time and how they are both experiences different times with the present. The love between Henry (Eric Bana) and Clare (Rachel McAdams) is undeniable as they were just meant to be together, but as Clare has met Henry many different times as she was growing up and Henry not being able to remember them because he has not yet been to those times and places when she first meets him in the Chicago library. The love in this film is expressed in so many different ways as with Clare knowing the truth about Henry stills wants to marry him and have a life with him forever. The forever love she shows when she longs for him to return from one of his time traveling experiences and the sacrifices they both make for their difficult relationship work is what I would call true love. Even after Henry's death the love that Clare has for him never dies, as she knows that one day she will see him again. Eric Bana and Rachel McAdams play Henry and Clare as well as you can feel the love they have for each other as you are watching this film is wonderful and moving.

    Time is such a precious issue in this film and shows that even though Henry travels from past, present and future, Clare is living life only in the present. For Henry the past, present, and future all happen at the same time and only Clare can experience time in the present. Waiting for Henry to return for Clare makes time run slower and when she is with him time seem to move by so very fast. Clare never feels like they have very much time together and to her it seems that the time traveling becomes more and more frequent. This film makes you want to take a step back and look at your life and think in terms on how much times flies by and how sometimes we can overlook what is truly important and that is the time and love we have for one another should not be taken lightly.

    The camera angles and the lighting set the theme in this film very well. As they shot the scenes of Henry and Clare together at the different times and places show how their relationship grows and so does the love for one another. The lighting in the grassy field where Henry first meets Clare when she is six years old was very realistic and set the tone for the whole film and how at many times throughout the film Henry travels back to the same location to visit her as she is growing up and even sometimes after they are already married.

    This is a drama based romance between two people that struggle with time and the love they have for one another. Time is a major and key issue and as you will see after watching this film that time should not be taken for granted and you should live every moment to the fullest with the one you love.
  • tarotwitch013 August 2009
    I had read the book three times when it first came out, so I was excited when I got tickets to an advance screening. I was just hoping they didn't ruin the book. I know films can't be like the books, so I carefully did not re-read it.

    They did an awesome job with the film. They captured the story, the flavor, the essence of the book, even if they did have to leave some things out. I loved the girls playing Alba.

    There was laughing at the funny parts and some crying at the sad. My sister loved it. She had no intentions of reading it and only went because I had tickets. She was sniffly when we left and now has the book.

    Notice to guys who like blow em ups. This is a romantic chick flick! Though the one guy I had talked to in line was crying as we left. He did say he loved it.

    I would have given it a nine if some of the scenes hadn't been filmed in the dark like a lot of Hollywood.
  • To my surprise I really enjoyed this movie, I ain't really a big fan of American romance movies but this one got my attention from beginning to end. What I liked most about it is how in the beginning your left confused but as the movie progresses it's like putting a puzzle piece together bit by bit until you figure it out. So the movie is basically about romance and time travel, it's about a guy that can travel to any stages of his life but not by free will, it just happens. And during the different stages of his life, it shows different stages of romance with the girl he fell in love with. It's well worth seeing it with your girlfriend, even if your not really into sappy stuff. Figuring out the mystery will keep you intrigued.

    7.8/10
  • When I entered this one, I thought it would be another Kate Hudson/Matthew McConaughey, Richard Gere/Julia Roberts,Diane Lane, wuvvy-duvvey-cutesy-wootsy boring predictable love movie.

    I was completely wrong. We've all seen movies that involve time travel and this one is near the top.

    It shows the reality of a relationship between two individuals who have to deal with the negative effects of time travel in a close relationship.

    This movie had me near tears at the end, which is truly sad since I haven't cried since the movie Beaches.

    The only thing I didn't like about this movie was that I found myself trying to figure out this mans time travel and if it made sense. There are a few loose ends left untied.

    Other than that, the two leads were solid and the movie is entertaining. I wouldn't rush out to see it, but it is definitely worth renting.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    After reading a lot of reviews i was not expecting much for this film but being a huge fan of the novel by Niffenegger i decided it was worth giving it a try. I was not disappointed. Although not true to the book in a vast majority of ways the movie was similar enough and could hold its own. McAdams was charming as Claire Abshire with little fault to her acting while Bana was also believable as Henry. The real stars for me, however, were the children; Brooklynn Proulx (Younger Claire) and Hailey and Tatum McCann (Alba). The main disappointment for me however was the portrayal of Gomez, played by Livingston. He was portrayed as a lovable and likable character which he is not in the books and this was the movies worst flaw i felt. While not everybody's cup of tea 'The Time Traveller's Wife' is a film i would most certainly recommend
  • jon.h.ochiai15 August 2009
    Warning: Spoilers
    On a cold winter's night Clare (Rachel McAdams) confesses to her husband Henry (Eric Bana), "I wouldn't change a second of our life together." McAdams and Bana are both beautiful and amazing in Director Robert Schwentke's "The Time Traveler's Wife" based on the bestselling novel by Audrey Niffenegger. "The Time Traveler's Wife" adapted by screenwriter Bruce Joel Rubin is a bitter sweet and strange love story. It is not perfect; although, it ends perfectly. There is a timeless and yearning quality that engages in "The Time Traveler's Wife". However, Schwentke and Rubin might have leveraged sharper emotional arcs at particular narrative points. During the course of their lives, Clare and Henry experience tragedy and joy. In spite of this, Rachel McAdams is stunning. I am in love with her. Bana is powerful and moving.

    In a heartbreaking scene Clare (McAdams) tells Henry (Bana), "Do you think I wanted this life?" Time Traveler Henry indiscriminately vanishes to different places in time and space. Interesting to that end, this seems to follow "The Terminator" rule: Henry can only travel through time naked. Also interesting to note that Bana as Henry is a muscular 6'3", which makes finding clothes that fit wherever he arrives difficult. I digress. The point is McAdams captures both Clare's humanity and angst. She embodies an authenticity in Clare. Eric Bana displays a strength and gentleness. His Henry travels to the future and meets his lovely 10 year old daughter Alba (amazing Hailey McCann). He gazes upon Alba with such love when she says, "I love you Daddy!" Underlying it all, "The Time Traveler's Wife" is about legacy and everlasting love. So regardless of some clumsy repetitive narrative loops and circular logic, McAdams and Bana make you care about their love story.

    We first see 6 year old Henry (good Alex Ferris) singing with his mom Annette (beautiful and strong Michelle Nolden) in a car. Tragedy befalls, and Henry's Time Traveler abilities are revealed—also by the grown up Henry (Bana). But for Henry this seems more curse than gift. Then one day Clare sees Henry in a Chicago library, and says, "It's you!" Apparently, older Henry has been visiting Clare since she was 6 years old. She says that he seems to keep visiting the same places. Henry replies, "Yeah. It's like gravity." Clare has been in love with Henry her entire life.

    It turns out that Henry has a genetic defect that is the cause of his time travel. To that end he seeks out, and finally convinces the bewildered Dr. Kendrick (solid Stephen Tobolowsky) of his plight. But what does this foreshadow about Clare and Henry having a family and their life together? Director Schwentke sort of telegraphs the painful narrative twist. Then he recovers and resolves perfectly and eloquently as Henry regrets, "I can't stay…" Ultimately, "The Time Traveler's Wife" is about life—its joy, fragility, and mortality. Things just happen, not necessarily for a reason. And if you take a chance and find the love of your life, then it is life worth having lived. I loved "The Time Traveler's Life".
  • Forget the scientific problems with all this. Let's just assume that such a thing happened. Imagine the curse of being this man. If you ever saw a film from the Sixties called "The Incredible Shrinking Man," which is also a bit allegorical, he was able to find his place in the universe as he moved into nothingness. The character here is so cursed as to never be able to finish anything he starts. Not only that, he arrives almost anywhere, naked, penniless, needing to be a thief or a beggar, at the mercy of anyone who is around. How much predetermination there is is never mentioned. He occasionally returns to a kind of linear world, seeing his love at different times in her life. He is apparently immortal and dead at the same time. The book does a nice job of creating an interesting human being, aware of all these issues and trying hard to manage. Here, he is at the whims of the gods and is just moving through life. It just doesn't work. I didn't get the affection thing at all. I saw him as a hopeless, sad creature.
  • Not okay, this is supposed to be a love story. But the only reason the woman loves him is because he's been grooming her since she was 6. Don't watch it. Also how can time travel be made so boring? Only thing he learned from time travelling all his life is how to steal clothes and break things. And how to feel sorry for himself. Pathetic. Watch Predestination instead if you like time travel.
An error has occured. Please try again.