User Reviews (34)

Add a Review

  • Maurice Richard is a very good film about one of the most important Canadian athletes ever. The film addresses many issues concerning the famous Montreal riot, following a major penalty given to Richard just a few days before the beginning of the play-offs, and the "revolution tranquille" ignitor.

    But this splendid film relates the story of an underdog player. His rise to hero and finally to that of a legend. It feels somewhat epic. The challenges Maurice faces are easy to relate to. You truly feel his angst has he's pushed around, beaten and bloodied. But still manages to overcome these problems and eventually becomes a symbol for every underdog who has ever dreamt of reaching the unreachable.

    Maurice Richard isn't just a good quebecois film. It's simply a good film. Worth seeing.
  • There are many great sports films and The Rocket belongs among the best of the best. If you liked Cinderella Man i would hazard to say that you might like The Rocket even more, especially hockey fans. I, myself am a fan of the Montreal Canadians and took two friends who were not and they both said that it was a great, great movie.

    I went into the theatre with modest expectations, as it was a Canadian made film without a huge budget and yet when i left i felt like i had to wipe the grime from the factory that the rocket worked off of my clothes. I have no doubt that this film will be nominated for best foreign film at the Oscars next year, you don't need to know who the rocket is to really enjoy this film.

    Bravo!
  • This movie is a real success. Maurice Richard was one of the best and fearless hockey player that ever was, he never gave-up. The people that worked on this movie really did a great job. All the locations where very well re-created especially the Montréal Forum. The actor who played Toe Blake was excellent and Roy Dupuis did a great job (he really does look like Maurice Richard). The hockey scenes where very well done, you feel like your on the ice. The attention to details is impressive it really looks like the fifties. Many actual hockey players ad a little part in this movie (like Mike Ricci) and did well. Richard worked hard to get to the NHL, he worked in a day factory and in the evening played hockey even if he was extremely tired. A must see movie for all the hockey fans.
  • In one of the comments on the film, the writer asks why there's no mention of Henri Richard, the "Pocket Rocket." The film really takes us up to it's climax, the Richard Riot, and Henri, fifteen years younger than Maurice, was starring with the Junior Canadians. Although he came up to play with his brother in the last years of Maurice's career, Henri was not on the team for the period covered by this film. The line of Henri at centre, Dickie Moore on left wing, and Maurice on right wing was called by the Rocket's great rival, Gordie Howe, the best line he ever played against. In a sense the movie stops at the point when Richard was the most popular player in Québec, that is before he became the greatest star in the rest of Canada too. When he received the Stanley Cup in Toronto after the Canadians swept the Leafs in four games straight to win their fifth championship in a row, everybody sensed it could be his last game, and he received a standing ovation in Maple Leaf Gardens, a rare honour for any visiting player, especially when he'd been throughout his career the Leafs' greatest rival. The film beautifully evokes the period when players were ordinary guys working for a living. The clothing and lighting are magnificent in capturing the feel of the forties and fifties, and the hockey sequences are amazing in that, having seen the Rocket play so many times, I lost sight that it was Roy Dupuis, not the Rocket, on the screen. And the sequence in which he kayos Bob Dill (Sean Avery in a piece of type casting if there ever was one!) is a dandy. That happened in New York and the Daily News, the tabloid famous for its great headlines, featured a full-page image of the Rocket standing over his fallen rival with a huge headline, "DILL PICKLED". I wish they'd put that in the film. Richard had a unique skating style and was unusual in those days because there were few left-hand shots playing right wing. And they were able to recreate one of the greatest goals in detail when the Rocket, after being knocked out by Boston's Leo Labine in the play-offs, returned in overtime and went end to end to score the winning goal against "Sugar Jim" Henry. Dupuis and the film magicians capture Richard's swooping, darting style beautifully. Richard may not have been the best player who ever played, but he was the greatest star the game will ever see. See this film and you'll be as close to seeing the real Rocket as it's possible to be.
  • This is an excellent film. I think that thing that I enjoyed most about this film is its humility. Despite his passion and brilliance on the ice, Maurice Richard was a humble man who never wore the mantle of greatness easily. Many of his accomplishments are depicted in this movie, but in a way that reflects this humble, yet utterly brilliant and great man. I was fortunate to be at the last game played in the Montreal Forum, almost 40 years after Richard last played for the team. The sixteen minute standing ovation and outpouring of emotion for this man when he was brought to centre ice is one of the most amazing things I've ever seen.

    If you're not from Quebec, and more specifically from Montreal, then it may be hard to understand the impact that this man had on the province. He was, during his playing days, literally seen as a religious icon. This movie does an amazing job at telling the story of the Rocket's lasting social impact upon Quebec, and it does so in a very quiet and compelling fashion.

    I should also point out the incredible detail that has gone into this film. As well as being an excellent actor, Roy Dupuis is a dead-ringer for the rocket. Mike Ricci is a carbon copy of Elmer Lach, and Vincent Lecavalier is a ringer for Jean Beliveau. The cages separating standing room from the seats were an actual feature of the forum through the 40s, and very much a symbol of French-Canadian working class discontent in Montreal at the time. The photograph sequence of Sugar Henry the Boston goalie who shakes Richard's hand after his game/series winning goal in the playoffs is lifted right out of the hockey history books--an amazing detail.
  • This was an excellent movie. It will definitely be collecting quite a few rewards. If you're a hockey fan, you'll love it. If you're a movie fan, you should see it. If you're a Canadian, this is your history on film. I'm tired of constantly hearing people grumble about the state of Canadian cinema ("not enough money blah blah blah"). Well this is a great Canadian movie that stands up, so go see it and support it. This is one of those great films everyone's been saying they wanted.. It's about one of the greatest hockey players ever, and it's one of the greatest hockey movies ever. There is a lot of history in this film and it looks gorgeous. Roy Dupuis is excellent. One thing I did wonder, however, is why there is nothing about Henri Richard in it.
  • Fans of ice hockey and especially fans of the legendary Montreal team (or should I say worshippers) are going to like this film. The re-creation of the period (wartime and postwar Quebec) is very good. The ice action is exciting and some of the editing is excellent. Mostly, patrons will enjoy the title performance by Roy Dupuis, whose tense and interiorized delivery is riveting.

    The film's achievement is to present the social and historical setting with restraint. The film could have been iconography, since Rocket Richard was the Babe Ruth and Joe Louis of the French-Canadians (and the fight with Dill was the Schmelling fight). But the movie does not rise to that bait: We are reminded that the greatest player in history, Richard, had to toil over a drill-press to earn a living, even while enjoying fame. The nascent pride of the French-Canadian, and the simmering needs of the impoverished, Montreal working-class, are offered without shouting, which is how they'd have been offered in the period of 1940-1955.

    Elements of historical realism are good. Especially wonderful is the depiction of the press of the period and of the French-speaking announcers. Radio French then was so good that it might have been called precious-- a condition of radio employment of the time, and a bit pedantic for a Quebec audience. Also interesting was how circumspect the pride was on the French side. People in the US South and Cajun Louisiana will relate to this.

    On the negative side are lots of things related to production value. Basically, the writing is poor-to-pedestrian. Dialog is obvious and clumsy, either needlessly echoing the sentiments of the period or conveying chunks of story that should be organic, not crassly narrated. The film is poorly focused, too, beginning correctly with the Forum Riot, but never truly coming back to that event. The entire movie should have been constructed as a series of flashbacks from one, defining event; it should also have been built with intimate scenes, not group-talk in the locker room. Yet the film skitters all over the map, hopping from one large scoring scene to another, one period to another, sequentially, and without any central moment. This is complicated by a confusing series of hockey games, where the precise stakes of each game (playoffs? regular season? final game??) are not explicit. Since Richard was so driven and efficient, the entire dramatic tension then evolves into his domestic conflict, where he agonized about being a young father putting himself at risk. Yet even that is fuzzy, since there's no one, single, domestic event offered, to help make it palpable. All you then see is the long-suffering wife worrying about what "might happen" to her husband.

    Because dialog is so bad, major characters like Dick Irvin drone in melodramatic tones, one-dimensional, where in fact they were more complicated. Finally, the film technique might have better exploited the speed and drama of the games themselves.

    This is so far under Raging Bull that we won't even go there, and its techniques don't match the sophisticated Quebec cinema of today. Nevertheless, it's a good film, especially for the Worshippers, and all fans of hockey and even history. Rocket Richard was a phenomenon, not just an athlete, and this film helps us to understand why, with some great acting, and much entertaining and emotionally draining material.
  • Well done! The Rocket was a true inspiration to many and an icon in Canadian history. The NHL and Canada has changed in many ways since his playing days. This film biography inspires us to relive the past and to press forward in our own lives everyday. With a heart as large as the whole province of Quebec his courage was his most valuable asset. His passion to succeed was undeniable. The more popular he became through hockey the greater a threat he posed on the others that couldn't control him or french minorities. Yet, the legend was also a gentleman, a father and a role model for anyone who was fortunate to be in his presence. The film expresses all of this beautifully with an original feel and amazing on ice reenactments of famous games. Thanks for the film and thank you Mr. Richard.
  • SnoopyStyle18 September 2016
    The movie starts with the Richard Riot in 1955 Montreal. In 1937, he is a machinist trying to make it in hockey. His boss is an union-basting English. He's 17 and Lucille Norchet at 13 has an eye on him. In 1942, he gets a tryout with the Montreal Canadians. He and Lucille get married despite her father's objection at his poor status. Initially, his signing is ridiculed as newspapermen label him fragile. He is close to being traded but nobody wanted him. His hockey dominance is eventually in the record books. He is a man of few words but he starts raising his voice against the racism set upon the French Canadian.

    It's a rather static biopic emotionally. Richard is a stoic man of limited words until he is challenged. This is a generally straight ahead historical drama. Expenses were not spared as the sets are not in want. It's a recounting of his hockey life. His personal is only interesting for about fifteen minutes. Julie LeBreton seems a little old to play 18 year old Lucille but she grows into the older version. The acting is generally solid. This could be great for a hockey fan of a certain age but it does need something more special to hook the general public.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Many sports fans today recognize the nickname "The Rocket" and probably only think of Major League pitcher Roger Clemens. However, long before Clemens was "The Rocket" from Montreal.

    This movie is a nice tribute to him - Maurice "Rocket" Richard - one of the greatest professional hockey players of all time. A lot of people - especially in Quebec - still think he's THE greatest of all time. Those kind of things are always up for debate and there is no answer who is the greatest, but Richard's career numbers certainly rank him as a leading candidate for that honor. For many years, the National Hockey Leauge had just six teams and played 50 regular season games. Richard was the first to score 50 goals in 50 games. He also was on eight Stanley Cup championship teams, including five in a row.

    His statistics go on and on but it was Richard's heart, his determination to succeed under adverse conditions and, finally, his stance in sticking up against the bias against French-Canadians in the NHL, that brought him "icon" status in Quebec. He is truly a "legend" in his country and probably will be revered forever in Montreal.

    How much of this movie is fact, and how is fiction, I can't say. If you know movies, you know that many times a lot of it is made up for dramatic purposes. Yet, I think most of it here is pretty much on the money. I'm not sure about the riot scene because I think the movie infers that people rioted because of Maurice's big suspension.but, according to the report below, the riot occurred thanks to the league president attending a playoff game in Montreal following his disciplinary action.

    This is from the Wikopedia: "On March 13, 1955, Richard was given a match penalty for engaging in a fight with Hal Laycoe in a game against the Boston Bruins. He flattened Linesman Cliff Thompson in the resulting mêlée, and as that was his second attack on an official that season alone, a hearing was held: Richard was suspended for the balance of that season and the playoffs, which was at the time, the longest suspension for an on-ice incident in NHL history. Public outrage from Montreal soon poured in, but NHL President Clarence Campbell did not budge, and announced that he would be attending the Canadians' next home game against the Detroit Red Wings in four days.

    Midway into the first period, Campbell arrived with his fiancée. Outraged Canadians fans immediately began pelting them with eggs, vegetables, and various debris, with more being thrown at him each time the Red Wings scored as they built up a 4-1 lead. The continuous pelting of various objects stopped when a tear gas bomb was set off inside the Forum not far from where Campbell was sitting. The Forum was ordered evacuated and Campbell ruled the game forfeited to the Red Wings. A riot ensued outside the Forum, causing $500,000 in damage to the neighborhood and the Forum itself. Hundreds of stores were looted and vandalized within a 15-block radius of the Forum. Twelve police and 25 civilians were injured, and scores of people were arrested. The riot was over at 3 a.m., and left Montreal's Rue Ste-Catherine a mess."

    Whatever, the movie overall is entertaining and gives a good insight on what Richard and his peers went through in a biased NHL at that time. The film is as much about the prejudice as it is a biography of Richard. The only drawbacks I saw were wooden acting in some spots, too much dumb dialog and some of the action scenes which didn't look as real as it could have been. However, this wasn't a mega-bucks production, so I didn't expect it to look as such. I was very impressed, however, with the wonderful photography in here. That looks big-budget, all the way. Kudos to the cinematographer.

    It was fun to see hockey players playing the game as they did in the "old days," wearing no helmets and face-masks and not a whole lot of padding. If you think hockey is a rough sport now, you should have seen it back in Richard's day. You can an idea watching this movie. There are some brutal scenes on the ice. Seeing Richard punching the referee was worth the price of the rental alone! If you're a hockey fan, or a sports fan who loves history, you have to check this film out. Why it took several years to hit the video shelves, I don't know.
  • "Maurice Richard" a.k.a. "The Rocket" tells the story of the real-life Quebecois hockey legend, who rose to prominence with the Montreal Canadiens during the second World War. The film shows us the various obstacles he had to overcome.

    At first, it seems as if his career will be over before it can begin. He's deemed to be "too frail", but he perseveres, and perseveres, until he emerges as a top-notch player who sets records, and wins the hearts of many in his home province.

    Of course, there are those who start gunning for him, determined to take him down a peg or two, and Richard gets into a number of fights over the next several years. But things get the most interesting when Richard, normally a humble and soft-spoken individual, decides to put his career on the line by speaking out about mistreatment of Francophone players in the NHL.

    More than just a good hockey film, this is a good human interest tale and character study, and lead actor Roy Dupuis is up to the challenge, delivering a sincere yet largely low-key portrayal. He makes Richard a relatable individual, especially seeing that Richard came from a working-class background before making good. Also excellent are Stephen McHattie as hard-driving coach Dick Irvin and Julie LeBreton as Richards' loyal and loving wife Lucille.

    Also figuring into the story are the catastrophic riots that emerged following Richards' punishment by the league. Ultimately, Richard would encourage the people of Quebec to keep their protests civil.

    Screenwriter Ken Scott and director Charles Biname make this underdog yarn vivid and compelling, and it can appeal to a viewer even if they are not necessarily a hockey fan.

    Seven out of 10.
  • ayiti1097730 November 2006
    As a person of French descent as well as French Canadian this movie was the best sports movie i've ever seen better than Raging Bull i almost cried tears of heartfelt pride Maurice Richard is a cultural icon he allowed us to hold our heads really high and like Jackie Robinson he sparked a cultural revolution for Le Quebecois after years OF racial prejudice he was like a burning flame in the darkest of places

    for us he was our beacon from humble beginnings he rose to greatness so we to are able to rise

    i can't really remember a time i didn't know about him and his legacy and what he meant to us as french people especially the riots of march 17th 1955 in Montreal and through out the Quebec province
  • sigrid-114 February 2007
    The story is very interesting and it was definitely a good idea making a movie out of this man's life - unfortunately, the movie does not do "The Rocket" justice. Many interesting facts or ideas are not followed through - every time you think that there's finally going to be something explored in more depth, the movie moves on to something else; and it's a pity. For instance, Maurice Richard's relationship with his brother-in-law isn't very clear. His brother-in-law appears quite often in the movie, but it is not quite clear why that is the case. He is always asking for better tickets for the games, and that's it. He never seems to get them, but we are never told why, or why this should be relevant to the movie. There is also a very short passage about gambling, but nothing comes of that either. Same thing with Richard's children. And what is probably the most important subject of the movie, the oppression of the Québécois in their own province and in Canada in general, falls completely flat. Hardly any context on this highly sensitive and political issue is given, and it is not clear whether Richard's actions did anything to improve the situation; it would have been nice to get a bit more information on that count. All in all, it is a very superficial movie, which is a pity because the subject-matter could have been used in such a way to make a very good film.
  • This is a true biopic, depicting events that could be considered as corner stones of NHL's History as well as Hockey History. it exposes the life of the Rocket since he was a teenager. All facts are historical : the depression just before WW2, the social divisions (as those cages that surrounded an area reserved for francophones in the Forum). Most dialogs in hockey scenes are in English, as well as all those involving the team, coaches and so on, which is "by respect of historical facts" in the original french version. Actually, many dialogs are recreated as they took place (and can be verified in many biography about The Rocket), even the coach's (Irvin) "pep talks". Hockey scenes are true to reality, as the scenarios were matched with game descriptions and old clips, were reviewed by Richard himself before dying and also his wife, his children, as by Irvin sun's written and recorded testimonies and memories from his father (he was the first Mr. "Hockey Night in Canada" on CBC), reporters, and so on.

    About the cast, my discovery is STEPHEN McHATTIE! HE IS JUST SUPERB IN IRVIN'S ROLE. Now that's a coach!! WOW. Actually the most credible I've seen in all sports movies around. Some of you who don't know about the Rocket, could find in Roy Dupuis some kind of weird acting... But actually, he played his role to the perfection, magnificently displaying the same kind of personality and behavior the Rocket had (he had the chance to study the guy's "attitude" in person for several years). The movie also adds historical drama, like the year when the Rocket broke Malone's record, a record that most considered as impossible to surpass, and which brought some sense of Victory to the people, just month before D-Day in Normandy (feb. 1945).

    What you'll see in this movie, is what made such a man a true Canadian Hero, as it really was and took place during those days. It is also a true love story, about the couple Richard.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Over the last few years, we have seen more and more quality french movies from Quebec, Canada. This one is definitely among the best movies ever made in Quebec. The film is really authentic, it has a perfect cast. Nothing was left behind.

    The stony is about Maurice Richard, an outstanding hockey player, considered as one of the best who ever played the NHL (every year, the NHL gives the Maurice Richard trophy to the top goal scorer).

    More than his exploits on the ice, the movie is about the raise of the french Canadians community, who was suffering from severe discrimination over the English people. The movie shows pretty well the role that Maurice played in the awakening of the people of Quebec.

    Top notch quality movie, who may have a shot at the Oscars as the best foreign movie. (C.R.A.Z.Y. might be a contender too.. we'll have to wait and see!) Go see this movie, you will not regret it!
  • I have been a hockey fan for almost 40 years and have collected almost every dramatic film ever made about the sport. But, I'd have to say that "The Rocket" is far and away, the best one ever made. The cinematography is stunning, the acting spellbinding and the story gripping. It tells the story of a simple and tortured man who drives himself to excel at the sport he loves. It leads him to become the reluctant hero of French-Canadian culture, self-perceived as being held back and oppressed by the anglophones.

    Roy Dupuis, who portrayed Maurice in no less than two other cinematic projects, perfectly captures the fire and intensity of the man in a most fitting, if not THE crowning tribute, to the legend of Maurice "The Rocket" Richard. Biname goes to great lengths to duplicate the look and feel of the late-30s, on into the mid-50s and certainly captures the collective agony and anger of early-to-mid 20th century French Canada.

    Julie LeBreton is beautiful and amazing as Richard's wife, Lucille. Notable also are the cameo appearances made by NHLers Sean Avery (Bob Dill), Vincent Lecavalier (Jean Beliveau); Mike Ricci (Elmer Lach), Ian Laperierre (Boom Boom Geoffrion) and Stephane Quintal (Dollard St. Laurent). What "Slap Shot" proved, "The Rocket" confirms. Pro hockey players are damn good actors!

    I realize funding for this movie was brought up in the infamous "Sponsorship Scandal" that dissolved former Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin's Liberal government in 2006, but you can't fault it at any level. It was worth every cent used to make it and it will be hard for Canadian cinema to duplicate this level of quality ever again.
  • Superb movie all around.

    Knowing the Rocket from only watching him as a hockey player, what I found most impelling was the love story between Maurice and Lucille. Much too short. Just perfect. But at the same time, would have loved to have seen more.

    Obviously, being a Canadian, old enough to remember the early years of Maurice Richard's professional life and the 6 team NHL from the late 40's, this movie is a no-brainer to recommend.

    From the very beginning, The Rocket is a scene turner. Photographed in black and white made it more realistic.

    Glad in part that it is in the mother language of the participants. Perhaps it would have been better if it were entirely in English, but that would have taken away from the realism. Having to continually drop my eyes to read the subtitles was of course interruptive.

    However, The Rocket is so well photographed and directed, that it was able to tell its story with minimal dialogue and thus prove the old adage, "a picture is worth a thousand words."
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This is a visually remarkable movie. Charles Biname and Pierre Gill do a terrific job of bringing the viewer back to the 1940s and 1950s and giving the movie a hardscrabble, gritty look. They also capture the rough-and-tumble, ultra-competitive feeling of Original Six hockey, where only the best of the best made it in and many players repeatedly had to fight - literally and figuratively - to keep their jobs. The hockey action is right up there with "Miracle" in quality. (It's also kind of funny to see the modern-day players making cameos in the movie struggling with the flat sticks and smaller equipment from that era.) Roy Dupuis also does a fine job of portraying the slowly building frustration, and ultimately rage, inside the Rocket as the NHL appears to discriminate against him on the ice.

    The only complaint I had about the movie, and maybe I'm alone here and maybe I'm just being cynical, but there were little bits that felt manipulative. Some American directors, and I'm not naming names but one of them is Steven Spielberg, are getting into the habit of making movies specifically designed to win a lot of awards. They put these tug-at-your-heart moments into the movie, but really they make you roll your eyes so hard you almost pull a muscle. At times the movie came close to turning into the Canadian "Cinderella Man," but fortunately it passed quickly. Maurice Richard was probably one of the five best hockey players of all time and this movie certainly does his story justice.

    And if that's not enough, Sean Avery gets the crap beat out of him, which drew loud applause at the screening I attended.
  • I've just seen the movie at Ljubljana film festival and I'm charmed! As I'm not from North America the name of Maurice Richard to me actually never meant more than a name of trophy. After seeing "The rocket" it changed. It's easier to understand what his name meant and probably still means to French Canadians - not just to hockey fans. A humble man who loved the hockey and his family and suffered injustices until one day he started to change things. I liked acting as well as the scenery of forties and fifties. I can only recommend this movie to everyone who wants to know more about Maurice Richard, the way NHL was functioning that time and what kind of impact he had in Quebec province.
  • As an American living in the South, we generally don't know a ton about the history of hockey. Sure, we recently obtained hockey teams and I attend rather regularly, but I am a newcomer to the sport compared to Canadians and those living in old established hockey towns like New York, Boston and Chicago. So please understand that my review is mostly targeted for us 'outsiders'.

    I wanted to see this film because I love the sport and know only vaguely about Maurice Richard's career and nothing about him as a person. Interestingly, after seeing this film, I still know very, very little about him as a person and many of the important issues brought up in the film seem to have little context. So, for a person NOT weaned on hockey, you, too might feel a bit confused and lost about this film.

    The film is a bit episodic like most biopics. You see a tiny bit about Richard when he was a teen and then it jumps ahead to when he began his NHL career. Then, it bounces around a bit--spending a lot of time on his early career--then a jump to mid-career and then really nothing about the latter part of his career and life after hockey other than a few clips tossed in at the end. About his life, you see he has a couple kids, it appears that he loves his wife (though this is also oddly vague) and they show a lot of clips of his brother-in-law--though I failed to see the connection. Did he like or hate his brother-in-law? I dunno. But it was very, very strange that they never mentioned that he had two brothers who also played for the Canadians hockey club. Although one only briefly played with them, the other played for years for the club and was a HUGE star (nicknamed 'The Pocket Rocket')--but this was oddly omitted. Why focus so much on the brother-in-law who didn't even play and who seemed unimportant to Richard in the film?!

    In biographies, there is almost always some sort of controversy or obstacle to overcome. This is an almost unvarying formula. In the case of "The Rocket", the obstacles were players who deliberately targeted him on the ice as well as discrimination against the French-Canadian players. The latter, in particular, is an important topic--and one that most Americans don't even realize is or was an issue. I was struck by the fact that the coach on the Canadians didn't even speak French--even though the team played in French-Canada! This is interesting and I wanted to hear more about this--because if it's true*, it needs to be addressed. But, the film never said much apart that RICHARD thought it was a problem! So, was he a whiner or was there serious discrimination against French-speaking players then or now? The film didn't really answer that and I found this frustrating.

    Now it sounds like I hated this film--I didn't. The acting and shots of players playing hockey were very nice. And, I loved the soundtrack. But because I liked what I was seeing, it made what I did NOT see even more apparent. I think perhaps the film would have been better as a mini-series or at least by offering a bit more clarity to us non-Canadian viewers.

    *When I did an internet search about it, I found LOTS of websites that felt that CURRENTLY there is a lot of discrimination against French-speaking hockey players. They indicate that non-superstars have a hard time making it into Junior Hockey or the NHL. If this is the case, then it really needs to be addressed and a film like "The Rocket" could have paved the way for this. The statistics I found were NOT very encouraging for young French-Canadian players.
  • Roy Dupuis stars as "The Rocket" Maurice Richard in this epic hockey film. It is one of the best hockey movies I have ever seen, even better than Miracle. It doesn't matter if it's in French or if you don't even know who Maurice Richard was. You will get to know him during this film and want to know even more once the film has ended. It's an inspiring tale of one man overcoming hardships to prevail and show everyone how wrong they all were. 1950's hockey is portrayed with a gritty reality. Some of the most intense hockey fighting appears throughout this film. Dupuis really shines in Richard's relationship with his coach and his wife. Whether, you're a hockey fan or not, this movie is a must see.
  • A very good action packed movie. I could watch it over again and again. I used to watch Maurice Richard play on the old black and white TV while watching hockey night in Canada, CBC. As a young lad about 10 yrs of age at the time, I had no idea how difficult it was for the French Canadian players. The movie was well done and brings back memories of childhood when we used to play hockey in the open air rinks in the backyard. Great movie.

    I always thought that the greatest players were as follows: Maurice Richard, Gordie Howe, Bobby Orr, Bobby Hull and I'm sure I missed one or two others.
  • bobbbylear18 May 2006
    Transported into 50's Quebec culture with tremendous ease. This movie is intelligent, witty and thought provoking. Ohhh, and not a bad hockey movie either. When entering the theatre I expected a relatively entertaining couple of hours. Instead, I got a magical experience that all movies should be. If you want to go and see a mediocre movie, this is not for you. This is the Rocky of Canadian culture! If it was American, it would easily be up for a few golden statues. It made me think about why I like movies so much. How many movies do that these days? The acting, directing and writing is superb. This movie has bite! You can see the fire in the eyes of the lens!
  • "The Rocket" was superb. Canadian filmaking at it's finest (another great recent example is Cronenberg's "A History of Violence"). The hockey legend was played to perfection by a stoic Roy Dupuis. And Dick Irvine's coach was anything but cliché.

    If you liked "The Rocket" you'll probably enjoy reading Quebec author Roch Carrier's biographical look at Maurice Richard and the Quebec he lived in entitled "The Rocket". Carrier, who penned "The Sweater" ("We were five Maurice Richards") and a quote from whom appears on the Canadian $5 bill, writes a thorough history of Richard, the Habs during his reign there and splatters the background with the tumult of the Quebec people over nearly 50 important years.

    The movie ranks No. 2 amongst all hockey films, with "Slapshot" undeniably in the No. 1 spot. The list drops off dramatically after that.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    First off, i can't really say that i am really a hockey fan, but living in Canada, a hockey dominated country, i saw myself forced into watching this movie. My first reaction was -- sports movie? probably just another Rudi or Coach Carter. However there was much more to this movie than winning the game. In fact, unlike the typical Hollywood sports movie, the protagonist always saw things negatively, never seeing himself as the greatest player or anything. The essence of the story too, is beautifully presented. I have the feeling that there is more of a racist theme than a sports theme here. The most powerful moment is possibly the one where the coach makes a speech in terrible french, but tries to connect with his players, and putting himself on the same level with them.

    On the film making aspects, there is just one thing to say -- beautiful! The arts department did an amazing job at recreating Quebec in the WWII era, and the cinematography was, well... amazing. The different colors used for different settings, the camera work, it was all a little different from other movies of its kind, it was truly a pleasure to watch!! So my final verdict is this...even if you don't care whatsoever about hockey, if you want to see a great movie, watch Maurice Richard: The Rocket!
An error has occured. Please try again.