Add a Review

  • MELTDOWN: DAYS OF DESTRUCTION, a would-be TV disaster movie from 2006, is only worth watching if you're wondering what happened to Casper Van Dien's career after STARSHIP TROOPERS (answer: not a lot). It's essentially a heatwave-based thriller, featuring some science guff about an asteroid passing close to the Earth causing our planet to move closer to the sun.

    What it all boils down to is a kind of road/post-apocalypse movie, as Van Dien and his colleagues/friends and family are forced to try to get to a place of safety while contending with intense temperatures. Strangely, despite the supposed heatwave, most of the characters continue to wear long shirts and/or jackets - at least the cult '60s flick NIGHT OF THE BIG HEAT made the effort of making the protagonists look all sweaty and dishevelled!

    Given the poverty-row budget, most of the threat comes from various looters and bad guys, and it's all done in a gung ho fashion and fairly well paced. But the writing is predictable and the characters non-existent, with none of the cast making much of an impact. About the only scene in the film I enjoyed was the bit with the exploding cars, which was novel; the rest is merely humdrum.
  • Although the idea was interesting, I was expecting it to be worse considering it was low budget. In my opinion, Meltdown: Days of Destruction is neither bad or good as an overall film, though it has assets that fall in both categories. What I did like about the film was that the acting was surprisingly better than average. Amanda Crew is beautiful and not too bland, Vincent Gale and Stefanie Von Pfetton are good and Casper Van Dien does his best to make his performance more than just a good-looking guy with non-existent acting skills which is something that has been plaguing a number of low-budget films I've seen in recent memory. I did also like the nice settings and the editing wasn't too choppy, while the music is not too over-bearing. The concept is also an interesting one. However, there are things that don't work. The most exciting Meltdown: Days of Destruction gets is towards the end, but around the middle it is rather sluggish and generic with predictable storytelling, very unlikely science and cheesy dialogue. The effects are minimal and while I have seen cheaper ones, in all honesty the effects here are not great in look(especially the meteor) and don't generate any sorts of thrills. The characters I didn't really engage with, some of them don't have much to do and the types of characters involved are reminiscent of the obligatory clichés you'd find in a SyFy original disaster movie. All in all, not a complete meltdown but not particularly much to it either. 5/10 Bethany Cox
  • Poor Casper Van Dien, his career has slid a long way from Tarzan and Starship Troopers.

    In Meltdown he's a policeman who just happens to be dating TV reporter Stefanie Von Pfeten and her brother is a scientist who's trying to deal with a speeding comment headed for Earth. But in the runaway comet business, even a near miss causes some real problems as the Earth's orbit goes out of kilter.

    From the survival of the Earth we go to the survival of Van Dien and his immediate family. His daughter's gangbanger boyfriend, Ryan McDonell actually proves to be of some use especially when he suspects a guy he knows as a crooked cop might mean the Van Dien group a lot of harm.

    My only question here is, why didn't they have Bruce Willis, Billy Bob Thornton and the rest of that crew to deal with the nasty comet?

    Pass this one up folks.
  • "Meltdown" is a disaster (tele)movie about really hot weather starring Casper Van Dien. That one sentence is probably enough to make most people run for cover but as a disaster movie devotee and long suffering fan of Mr Van Dien, I found "Meltdown" pretty irresistible.

    You could drive a semi-trailer through the holes in the film's plot. In short, scientists fire a nuclear weapon into a meteor with the intention of developing a meteor defence program. However, instead of fragmenting, a large chunk of the rock heads towards earth only to be deflected. Unfortunately, the near miss manages to push the earth out of orbit, dragging it towards the sun and resulting in really hot weather.

    Casper plays Tom, a police officer, who attempts to save his family and new girlfriend from the heatwave and protect them from the looters who have taken over the city. This synopsis actually makes the film sound more interesting than it is. In reality, most of the film involves sweaty people walking around looking for water. Strangely, it never enters anyone's head to turn on a tap or purchase a beverage from a vending machine. Things get a bit more exciting towards the end of the film when rogue policemen capture the brother of Tom's new girlfriend. This at least gives Casper the opportunity to wrap a shirt around his head and shoot a gun.

    The extent to which you will enjoy "Meltdown" surely depends on your view of Van Dien. Personally, I find something deeply hypnotic about Casper's cheesy, square jawed persona and his determination to appear in trashy, straight-to-TV action thrillers. He reminds me of Zoolander with guns. Despite my appreciation for Casper's body of telemovie work, I would still like to see him make the occasional film that actually gains a cinematic release.

    In addition to Casper's stunning acting performance, further "Meltdown" highlights include a couple of exploding cars, a bad CGI meteor and some hilariously improbable science. The other actors in the film are all competent, with Venus Terzo a standout as Tom's first love, Bonnie. Amanda Crew also makes an impression as Tom's daughter.
  • LadyLiberty11 February 2007
    Warning: Spoilers
    Meltdown opens on a scene of scientists preparing to conduct an important test on a missile system developed to deflect asteroids should they be on a collision course with earth. Nathan (Vincent Gale) mentions some misgivings to his, but the test appears to be an unqualified success. Then the asteroid breaks apart, and the largest piece is pushed into a direct collision path with earth. Fortunately, the huge rock skips off of earth's outer atmosphere and ricochets into space. Unfortunately, the glancing blow is just enough to alter earth's orbit, and the planet begins to spiral closer to the sun.

    While all of this is going on above their heads, Los Angeles cops Tom (Casper Van Dien) and Mick (Greg Anderson) are on a stake-out. They're supposed to collect evidence against a suspected drug dealer, but the deal they're watching quickly devolves into a shooting match. Afterward, Tom takes a few minutes to be interviewed by a local television reporter who also happens to be his girlfriend, Carly (Stefanie von Pfetten).

    At a nearby hospital where Mick is treated for a minor injury, Tom has a brief chat with his ex-girlfriend Bonnie (Venus Terzo), who is a nurse. He tells her he's concerned about the fact that their 17 year-old daughter Kimberly (Amanda Crew) is dating a man named CJ (Ryan McDonell). Once Tom explains to Bonnie that he's discovered CJ has a criminal record, she's a little worried herself.

    It's not long, however, before everybody has something else to worry about. The temperature is rapidly rising all around the world. Carly is one of the first non-scientists to learn what's really happening. Nathan, who is her brother, calls her to say he may have a way that they can survive. Carly calls Tom; he, of course, promptly contacts Bonnie.

    In relatively short order, the motley group is on the road. Before they can reach their ultimate goal, however, they've got to make their way through bands of looters, deal with a catastrophic water shortage, and manage to travel in temperatures that are high enough to kill.

    Casper Van Dien is a good looking guy, and I actually enjoyed him in Starship Troopers. That may be because he's good in action scenes. It might also be because he didn't talk much in that movie. In Meltdown, he's unfortunately given just enough lines in situations that are just dramatic enough to showcase his entirely average acting abilities. Amanda Crew is also okay, and Ryan McDonell isn't bad, either. Vincent Gale and Stefanie von Pfetten are also both reasonably good, but Venus Terzo is sadly on a par with Van Dien.

    What really makes or breaks a movie, though, is the story and the script. While the story here is okay and actually has some real potential, the script is just awful. The science part of the science fiction is non-existent starting with the asteroid pushing the earth out of orbit and escalating with the notion that the "gravitational balance of the solar system" might "pull the earth back" into its usual orbit "over time." When the temperature in LA hits 120 degrees, cars start blowing up.

    You know what's even worse than the bad science? The bad continuity. Okay, really hot. Why are people in the movie not only wearing long sleeved shirts, but jackets, too? Why are people mugging each other for bottled water instead of turning on the taps at home? Why are the streets completely empty, but the freeways completely full? And why are the freeways full of unexploded? It's almost superfluous to note that the sets, costumes, and production values were good, especially when that only forces me to say that the edits were not.

    So basically, you take a pretty good story idea and combine it with mostly mediocre acting, a terrible script, low-end special effects, utterly irrational plot twists, and poor edits, and what do you have? A movie that's even less than the sum of its inconsiderable parts. I'm sorry to say that I can't recommend Meltdown: Days of Destruction to anyone.

    POLITICAL NOTES: There is mention here that Congress finally loosened the purse strings enough to fund the tests that start the movie rolling. While the tests here were wholly irresponsible (targeting an asteroid with a nuke and not knowing the composition of the big rock is, in fact, well beyond irresponsible and approaching the insane), the fact is that such scenarios are a very real danger to the planet. Unfortunately, we've tracked nowhere near all of the near earth asteroids that could be worrisome in some orbit some day; and our ability to spot something on a collision course with us is limited at best.

    Once we do discover we're going to be hit, we quite literally have no system in place to deal with it. There are no nuclear-tipped space missiles we can launch; the space shuttle is completely incapable of going beyond earth orbit, and if it were, we couldn't launch enough of them or launch them quickly enough for it to matter. I'm not big on the government doing anything beyond its constitutional mandates, but I certainly think protecting the planet from destruction coming at us from outer space could be construed as defending the country, don't you? FAMILY SUITABILITY: Meltdown: Days of Destruction is rated R for "some violence." I frankly didn't find the violence here anything beyond a fairly typical T-rated video game. If your teens are keen on seeing Meltdown and you can't talk them out of it, the R-rating shouldn't dissuade you from letting them see it. It's not, however, a good idea to leave the younger kids in the room with their elder siblings. While the shootings aren't too graphic in the main, some of the dead bodies are.
  • Once again, Vancouver -- The king of schlocky Canadian 'made for TV' movies has done it again. Yet another movie made as a tax write-off for wealthy or semi-wealthy investors. Gotta hide that money somewhere, eh fat cats? As for the movie;

    It was made to be bad and to lose money (for tax loss purposes) and on that level I applaud it. It's certainly a terrible movie and I have to hand it to the producers -- they accomplished everything they set out to make; a terrible money-losing movie. Bravo! Well done!

    ---------------------------------

    The British Columbia Production Services Tax Credit (PSTC) encourages film, television and animation production in BC and is available to either international or Canadian productions produced in British Columbia.

    There are four components:

    The basic PSTC tax credit is 33% of qualified BC labour expenditures incurred after February 28, 2010.

    The REGIONAL tax credit is 6% of qualified BC labour expenditures of the corporation pro-rated by the number of days of principal photography in BC outside of the designated Vancouver area to the total days of principal photography in BC.

    The new DISTANT Location tax credit is 6% and is added to the regional tax credit for principal photography done outside of the Lower Mainland Region, north of Whistler and east of Hope, excluding the Capital Regional District.

    DIGITAL ANIMATION or VISUAL EFFECTS tax credit is 17.5% of BC labour expenditures directly attributable to digital animation or visual effects activities.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Being a fan of sci-fi films, I was initially attracted by the title, but as it appeared this was going to be yet another near-disaster movie of the "asteroid/comet/meteor about to hit the earth and wipe out humanity, but Hooray! America will save the world" genre which has been done so many times before, I nearly didn't bother to continue watching, and with hindsight I'm sorry I did. However, what did sway me was the unusual premise that the asteroid's gravitational effect as it narrowly missed the earth pulled our planet nearer to the sun. (It wasn't clear whether Earth was continuing to approach the sun or whether it was simply in a stable new orbit, but maybe I was losing concentration if that was stated.) However, while raging fires are sweeping across the globe and two rival groups of characters (the goodies and the baddies) are desperately trying to get to a plane to fly them to the Arctic, the possibility is aired that the gravitational force of the other planets might pull the earth back into its proper orbit, and the sign that this has happened would be that rain would once again start to fall. So when the rival factions get to the airport and learn that the plane - their last hope of survival - has crashed, a battle takes place and surprise, surprise - the goodies win. But just as our heroes seem doomed to burn up anyway, Hey presto! Down comes the rain! Gosh - those planets worked pretty fast to get the earth back in place in such un-cosmic haste! My advice is: don't waste an hour and a half watching this!
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Despite scientist Nathan's warnings, his boss continues an experiment meant as publicity for his satellite firm: exploding an asteroid. Instead it splits, and the major piece, the size of Iceland, changes course to earth.

    It is deflected but so close that it shift our course closer to the sun, causing rapid extreme heating, hopefully only mid-term. Nathan warns his sister, TV journalist Carly, and she her lover, police detective Tom.

    He brings his unruly daughter Kim, her ex-con lover C.J. and her mother, nurse Bonnie, when Nathan offers a flight to a friend's Arctic weather station.

    Tom takes charge of a dangerous trip to the airport, as everywhere on earth things catch fire and people fight for water, transport and sheer looting.....

    fantastically bad from the beginning, Van Dien shows his shirt no mercy as he spends the duration of the film sweating and looking a little concerned in some scenes. it's highly unbelievable that this guy could have a family, let alone trying to bring it together, but he does.

    as the heat rises, we see the group walk very slowly, meeting people and getting into scrapes. This carries on for the whole film.

    Van Diens daughter has to be as unlucky as Kim Bauer, because she has a gun to her head a couple of times, nearly gets blown up, and faints at the badness of it all.

    if this had an amazing budget, big stars (no offence to the cast here) and Bay at the helm, this could have been a fun popcorn blockbuster.

    Instead we get one dimensional villains, extras who appear to be asleep on the floor, and a literal mad scientist.

    But it's awful in a laughable sort of way.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This movie is an example of why I stopped watching movies altogether for over 3 years. Lately I have had a lot of spare time, so I have gotten back into movies again. The problem with most movies, is that they are excruciatingly dumbed-down to a 6th grade level of comprehension. After taking a few years away from movies, it has become crystal clear how dumbed-down movies truly are. This movie is an example because of the terrible, over dramatized acting, stupid decisions by the characters, predictable story line, and predictable everything for that matter. Bad movies (most movies) require either the characters to make extraordinarily blind and ignorant decisions, or predictable, over the top or completely unrealistic events in order to create conflict and move the plot forward. These factors then greatly effect the continuity and realism of a movie. If I wanted to watch a bunch of nonsense, I would watch cartoons instead! For example, in the movie, as the characters are driving to the North Pole (Yes, the North Pole), the outdoor temperature is so hot that it is blowing vehicles up.. however, while they are traveling, sweating like beasts in 130ish degree heat, and their truck explodes (after they escaped with only a second to spare - ridiculously predictable), the characters are almost all wearing layers of LONG SLEEVED shirts, pants, and one is even wearing a hoodie JACKET. Now somebody PLEASE tell me, how or WHO in the right mind, while directing or producing this film, had the bright idea to have the characters wear long sleeve shirts, pants and jackets in the sweltering heat??? Any person with half a brain would know that if this situation was occurring in real life, people would be wearing the least amount of clothing possible, but not sweaters and jackets!! This is only one example. Judging by the sheer ignorance that produces most films these days, I honestly believe that even myself would be able to produce and direct a movie that would easily blow at least 2/3 of all movies out of the water.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I liked this film and not just because I'm a guy and think Amanda Crew and the blonde reporter are really hot. It is slightly cheesy as many TV movies are but the science is, for the most part, sound *because* in the end it rains and this indicates some assumptions the lead scientists made in the film were wrong ( see the FAQ I started ).

    Notice all the Washington state license plates and one California license plate throughout the movie ( the film was shot in B.C. )? This shows the director, actors, screenwriter(s) and producers understand a global catastrophe is truly global.

    I must dispute what Ladyliberty wrote: ''..While the story here is okay and actually has some real potential, the script is just awful. The science part of the science fiction is non-existent starting with the asteroid pushing the earth out of orbit and escalating with the notion that the "gravitational balance of the solar system''

    No, it is not non-existent. I think that layer getting burned off at the beginning of the film by the space rock is the rest of our Earth's ozone layer and that Earth's orbit around the sun and/or rotational axis was only slightly offset. Meltdown's problem is it narrows the focus of global review of an incoming asteroid/meteorite to a single group of scientists. The film is politically and economically unrealistic -- that's OK sci-fi doesn't have to be ( this time ).

    ''..the fact is that such scenarios are a very real danger to the planet. Unfortunately, we've tracked nowhere near all of the near earth asteroids that could be worrisome in some orbit some day''

    Ha, you probably do not know there is a recurring military side independent of NASA's infrastructure and has sort of been that way since the late 1970's or early 1980's. In addition to many professional amateur astronomers pointing their reflector and refracting telescopes at the night sky on a daily or weekly basis there are large scale CCD cameras mounted to orbiting satellites pointed away from the Earth that pretty much do nothing but look for approaching chunks of rock.

    I give Meltdown six out of ten stars during a year that saw very little sci-fi. It seems western Canada is the new sci-fi Hollywood.
  • I would rather have someone cut out my eyeballs with a razor blade than have to watch this movie again. I watched it from start to end thinking it couldn't get any worse....BUT IT DID. The writers and producers should be slapped for putting this kind of crap on television. The actors are ALL terrible. Get out of Hollywood you fools and go work at McDonalds sweeping the floors and emptying the trash. Anyone that thinks this movie is even remotely decent should be hung. They are an embarrassment to humanity. To think we have soldiers putting their lives on the line for anyone that produces this kind of inane garbage. Makes me embarrassed to say I'm an American.
  • From the opening sequence I thought I had MELTDOWN nailed as a cross genre film which mixes DEEP IMPACT with a cop thriller . This seemed a strange idea , but that's not how the plot unravels . Apparently the near miss with the asteroid causes the Earth to spin off its axis which leads to the world's temperature rising , rising and rising . So we've got a plot featuring something similar to the novels of Wyndham and John Christopher where a group of people have to find sanctuary or else they'll join most of the world's population in dying a slow terrible death

    I can't say MELTDOWN is a great apocalypse movie but since it's a direct to video/DVD film therefore lacking a big budget it's a relatively good meaningless time waster . My only real problem is a line of dialogue spouted by the scientist character in the sewer which happens half way the running time which will you leave you gasping " oh dear I think they've given away the ending ! "
  • Warning: Spoilers
    MELTDOWN is pretty interesting SCI-FI. No major budget, very few special effects; but decent acting and a storyline of global doom is enough to sustain viewing. An asteroid grazes the atmosphere and thrust the Earth into an orbit closer to the sun. Global warming rapidly becomes unbearable. A determined LAPD cop(Casper Van Dien)goes all out to save the world from certain annihilation as the rising temps are devastating. The pressure is on to save mankind from this solar catastrophe; as well as protect his daughter, nurse ex-wife and TV reporter girlfriend. The cast includes: Stefanie Von Pfetten, Venus Terzo, Amanda Crew and Vincent Gale.
  • metalrage66625 February 2016
    Warning: Spoilers
    As a movie made for TV, Meltdown isn't a complete dismal failure, but even with the minimal budget, barely any actors with ability and a ridiculous premise I still expected it to at least make some kind of sense.

    Annoyingly this starts out OK; a large asteroid is hurtling towards earth and an agency has set up an orbiting 10 megaton warhead as a countermeasure for just this type of thing. One of the operators notices an anomaly and wants to abort but he's told to proceed as normal. The warhead is fired, hits its target but fails to destroy the object. Instead it breaks into 3 large pieces. The largest piece, which we're advised is the size of Iceland, is set to collide with earth.

    Instead of creating the extinction level event that's expected, the piece hits earth's atmosphere and bounces off, however the impact has managed to jolt the earth out of orbit, (yes you read that right), and it's predicted that over the coming week the temperatures will increase to around 150 degrees Fahrenheit or 65 degrees Celsius.

    As the earth starts to fry in the sudden global heatwave, fires break out in various parts of the world, water is in short supply, widespread lootings are afoot and police detective, Casper Van Dien, along with his family, set off for the airport in the hope of reaching the Arctic. The rest of the movie is a random mix of events that plague their attempts to get any respite from the soaring temperatures.

    Needless to say, they never make it to a plane and therefore, never get to the Arctic, but for some reason, certain doom is avoided by way of magnetic pull from planetary alignment, or some such rubbish, the earth manages to sort itself out, rain cools everything down, I puke, the end.

    To say that this movie doesn't make sense and falls completely off the rails is a vast understatement. Despite the highly questionable and implausible science, the actions of all concerned just don't make any logical sense. One of the characters, who happens to be the technician who was against firing the nuke in the first place is carrying a portable temperature reader and even though it's readings are increasing and around 140 degrees, everyone is still wearing jackets or long sleeves, no one is wearing a hat, only one person passes out even though none of them have had the water necessary to continue and none of them appear to be sweating all that much. It's hot enough to cause cars to overheat and spontaneously combust but not hot enough for anyone to roll up their sleeves or discard their jackets apparently.

    Forest fires make sense, looting and rioting and killing for water also makes sense, but at 60 degrees Celsius there's going to be very little running or fighting going on as it'd be virtually impossible to breathe adequately by this time for that type of action, clothing would be at a minimum and the group would've died from heatstroke or organ failure 5-10 degrees earlier from being out in the open. There'd be widespread flooding from icemelt, all permafrost would be in thaw and with no water pressure left to fight fires, that would make ground temperature even hotter.

    All of that however is moot, seeing as any object large enough to knock earth from orbit would also destroy the earth on impact, but if that happened we wouldn't have a bad movie to laugh at. Budget constraints shouldn't be an excuse to forgo the simple research that would at least make movies like this more enjoyable and slightly more logical in its progression even if the chain of events that caused it are impossible. This'll be OK for a late night movie on TV, but it isn't worth going out of your way for.
  • An asteroid bounces off the Earth's atmosphere and moves the planet closer to the sun in this stupid made-for-television sci-fi flick. Nathan (Vincent Gale) is a scientist. You know he is a scientist because he says a lot of science things while staring at a computer screen, runs programs, tries to warn higher-ups, and mutters "oh my god" a lot. He and some other scientists sent a nuclear warhead into space and blew up a cheesy, computer-animated asteroid, sending one big chunk of it toward Earth. It kind of misses, but tempers rise as the progressively sweaty scientists can do nothing about the sudden spike in temperatures around the world. Police officer Tom (Casper Van Dien) happens to be dating Nathan's hot (so to speak) TV reporter sister Carly (Stefanie von Pfetten), and the trio watch as society descends into chaos because of the heat. The humidity also frizzes the hair of Tom's bratty teenage daughter Kimberly (Amanda Crew), his old flame (sorry) nurse Bonnie (Venus Terzo), and Kimberly's juvenile delinquent boyfriend C. J. (Ryan McDonell). The group decides to head toward an airport where Nathan is sure they can catch a plane out of the sweltering country, headed for the North Pole. The viewer is then treated to stock footage, badly choreographed action sequences- did the heat affect everyone's ability to hit anything with machine guns?), awful special effects, and characters' attempts at being likable.

    Other reviews of this film paint it as a brain-dead good time, but I cannot excuse it like that. It is simply terrible. There is not one cast member you will root for. The script tries to play up the soap operatics of the characters, but I could not care less about whether Tom will choose Carly or Bonnie, or if anyone eventually accepts C. J. as a good but misunderstood guy. Nathan's slow descent into madness is hilarious without meaning to be. I'm no scientist, but "2012" was more plausible than this thing. Not only is the science suspect, but other logical errors abound. I challenge you to go more than two scenes suffering through Kimberly's pouting before you will want to spill some gasoline on her and light a match. Poor Casper Van Dien was a pretty hot property (again, sorry) for a while, but now has to do dreck like this. "Meltdown: Days of Destruction" left me stone cold.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Honestly, this wasn't a bad movie. The characters were likable and engaging.The relationships were plausible and compelling. The idea of the world's population struggling together seems very real. However, the premise is that the world is overheating (as the title alludes to) yet nearly all the characters in the movie were wearing such items as a long sleeved shirts, sweat shirts, long pants, a hooded sweat jacket, and even a winter coat. They wore this attire for nearly the entire movie..even though the world is baking. If you want the audience to believe the world is heating up at a rapid clip..don't you think the characters should dress for extreme heat? I couldn't take the movie seriously because of the wardrobes. It made me giggle through the whole thing. Just my two cents. :)