Add a Review

  • safenoe10 January 2017
    Warning: Spoilers
    I love Itchy and Scratchy and seriously I laughed out loud big time during this episode with Itchy and Scratchy running amok...until Marge decided to launch protests about its gross violence. Sort of like Child's Play or other ultra-violent movies that unfortunately appeal to children.

    Anyway, I thought the ending was a bit rushed and didn't really deal with the moral distinction between the naked Statue of David and cartoon violence. There really is a difference but Marge didn't know how to explain it. She was flummoxed. But still, one of the best Simpsons episodes that deserves to be watched over and over again.
  • This episode feels relevant more than ever nowadays, especially with how the creators pulled the Michael Jackson episode due to the claims made in the Leaving Neverland documentary and all the other things that are being hidden. Outside of that it has a great psycho parody at the beginning and the scene with the censored version of the cartoon is really funny. This is probably one of my favorite episodes just for the censorship commentary, but what's outside of that is still great as well.
  • Analog_Devotee4 June 2021
    9/10
    9/10!
    A great episode about the dangers of censorship written by the master John Swartzwelder! Loved this one!
  • g-bodyl11 March 2014
    The ninth episode in the second season of the Simpsons is a very good episode and has some funny jokes. There are two things I really like here. The first is the reference to Psycho. The very beginning is where that happens and the music and such is spot on. Secondly, I loved the satire on censorship. Censorship has been a big issue and it's nice to see the Simpsons poke fun at it.

    In this episode, "Marge and Scratchy and Itchy," Maggie attacks Homer with a mallet and Marge blames the T.V show with Scratchy and Itchy and gets it banned much to the dismay of everyone.

    Overall, this is a great episode. I liked how the episode centered on Marge for once and that's a nice change of pace. But once again, a very funny episode. I rate this episode 9/10.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Very well-written episode that challenges cartoon violence. There's plenty of hilarity and scenes that play tribute to classic moments. The best scene, in my opinion, is when Maggie pulls out a mallet and hits Homer in the head in a classic scene playing tribute to "Psycho". The climax is awesome. The surprise element is awesome. The plot is wonderfully written into the story. Basically, Marge examines the Itchy and Scratchy on television to find that Maggie duplicates actions she sees during the cartoon. And so, Marge makes it her mission to stop cartoon violence by creating conflict with the cartoon company, all the way to Roger Meyers, Jr. And so, the episodes are toned down, allowing Maggie to adapt to a less violent nature... along with hundreds of other children. Eventually, Marge's campaign is crossed as she doesn't find a problem with Michelangelo's "David" coming to town... which means that since she doesn't mind nude art... then she shouldn't mind violent humor. And so, the cartoon company re-establishes its goal of churning out grisly and painful episodes of Itchy and Scratchy, delivering the ever-popular dose of entertainment to children which they constantly crave. I loved this episode... it was very vivid... the violent scenes were very memorable and played a huge role in creating the mood. Overall, it was the perfect balance of satire and dark humor.
  • maddox-richard19 February 2012
    Warning: Spoilers
    Hats off to the writers: Clever but not so much it spoils the humour. A violent cartoon about the effect violent cartoons have on their young audience. But rather than be preachy about it the writers have turned this into a decently balanced argument on the responsibilities of the artist and the legacy of their work. I'd like to think Stanley Kubrick would have quite liked this episode: he restricted public screenings of A Clockwork Orange after reports of copycat acts of violence. I haven't watched it in years but if memory serves this film shows the producers of the cartoons to be mindless, attention/money-grabbing immoralists who do not care if their product is damaging to young minds as long as they get rewarded. It also depicts some parents (Marge) as concerned moral guardians (not just unthinking religious or right wing zealots). The conclusion, that artistic freedom (aka freedom of speech) must be defended above all, even at the expense of our loss of innocence - is a stark but honest appraisal of violent stupid cartoons the world over. In fact, creaky and transparent though the episode is, its depiction of the innocence we have lost is moving and I can still remember how moved I was when I first watched it. I can't say that about many cartoons.
  • The character of Marge Simpson is very unique, mostly because we've all met or have known, or even have a person like Marge in all our lives. Someone who is a killjoy, but once they get into the swing of things they suddenly start having fun. This episode is part of a series of Marge related episodes that have to do with her trying to ruin everyone else's is fun to satisfy her needs. This is also a very big paradoxical trait of Marge Simpson, she comes off as mature and wise, but in reality she isn't and you do feel like telling her "Grow the Hell up". She's insecure and unsure about herself, which is why she's so relatable and understanding. Although I will admit in later seasons her cute phrasing of certain words can get annoying and grading. I will admit that it doesn't affect the character at all. Because a major reason why Marge is a good character is how hard she tries, and how forgiving she is. Now this episode is a good example of Marge showing how much motivation she can inspire in everyone, but at the same time not realizing the consequences. Se wants Itchy and Scratchy to stop being violent for children everywhere, and while does work for a short time, the same people that she helped inspire want her protest something that she actually likes. This is a very clever and relatable issues people do in fact face. We can make a difference, but we can't not make up with the "live or die" mindset that everything we do is going to change someone for the greater good. Because the truth is, while we certainly shouldn't take away freedom or the freedom of expression, we shouldn't think that everything we do is a cure all for all the worlds problems. If you succeed the first time at making something good and decent, but then it stops, don't act like it was all in vain, because something good will have come out of it in the long run. This episode is very smart at reminding people, that every action has consequences, and that we can't solve everything wrong with society for very long. This episode was when The Simpsons writing was at it's very smooth, and adult, and it's still good all these years later.
  • VenVes13 September 2018
    Every parent has the right and duty to stand up against something they feel is harmful for their children. This episode had only one good section (which felt out of place amidst every other part of its condescending content) and that was the part with all the children outside. Way to go out of your way to pat yourselves on the back, Simpsons writers.
  • hellraiser79 February 2022
    Warning: Spoilers
    Warning do not read unless seen episode.

    "Satan isn't in these books, it's in here it's in your hearts."

    Reverend Shaw "Footloose"

    This is another honorable mention, this is an interesting one as it's one centered on Marge. I'm not normally a fan of the character but I do stand alone episodes on her as it's a break from the usual central focused characters and once again broadens the scope of the world they inhabit.

    Though what's interesting is that here Marge for once is the villain of the story, but the thing is she doesn't really know that which is a common feeling with most villains thinking they're in the right but are more wrong than ever.

    The episode satirizes and deals with the issue of censorship and its ridiculous nature, but also simply on cancel culture how hypocritical, nonsensical, and worst of all hazardous to your health it truly is.

    We see Maggie is the culprit of violence, all because she saw an episode of a cartoon. But as we see each act is directed toward her father. This shows that Maggie has some deep seeded dark tendencies and probably harbors deep dark hatred to her father that seeing those episodes of "Itchy and Scratchy" just inspired her to act and manifest those tendencies.

    Though also there was some irresponsibility going on in the Simpsons household (as usual) where no one was really watching Maggie, keeping her from watching a program that isn't appropriate for her age but just simply not watching her in general on where she might go, do, or even get hurt unintentionally. Both these things show how expressive entertainment isn't the culprit of bad and violent behavior but it's in issues of bad parenting and even unchecked mental health that produce it.

    But as we see Marge doesn't see it that way or is just complete unaware/oblivious on the real issues and just singles out an easy target which is the cartoon. Granted Marge has good intentions but as an old saying goes, "the road to Hell is paved with good intentions" and Marge has just taken her first step.

    From the amount of time and energy Marge and the rest put into the campaign, I can't help but think of all the other more important issues out there that are affecting our world like Pollution, Crime, Disease etc. Take your pick. It just goes to show how easy it is to scape goat instead of dealing with what really matters.

    Really like the creator of "Itchy and Scratchy" whom is a jerk and is more doing the cartoon for the money, which is true about most franchises produced, but all the same like with every legal business he has a right to do what he does. There's a good "Smartline" scene where two characters raise some good arguments from the creator saying violence happened way before cartoons were invented which is true and Dr. Monroe who states certain psychological issues that are dealt with every day. From what they stated it shows it's may 'be Marge that's a little out of touch with reality and just simply what's going on in the present, though that sort of makes sense as she's someone that barely gets out of the house much, let alone read USA Today or a History book.

    It's funny in one scene how he's having the hardest time trying to make the next "Itchy and Scratchy" cartoon appropriate for the masses but must consult Marge. It's understandable why the creator is having a hard time, appealing to the masses is impossible and when we resign creative control to them you're just going to wind up with a lot of nothing and no one comes home happy.

    Which is what happening when we see the reworked "Itchy and Scratchy" episode which is one of the most boring cartoons ever, in a way this is almost prolific on the recent long string of bad revivals we've had which didn't look and feel right; part of why this cartoon isn't good is simply because it has no conflict/struggle which mean no real story.

    We see this did create a positive change as ever kid is playing outside in sort of the old America style. Or at least it seems that way as there's a worm in one of the apples Marge has grown, because the thing is their all doing it because their other option of entertainment is gone. And that's what I didn't have a good feeling about, yeah, I like to play outside or get out of the house myself but at least I have the options open on whether I want to or not.

    And we see another worm in another of the apples as there are protests now to ban Michelangelo's famous David sculpture. It's funny they would be against a cultural masterpiece hundreds of years old, I wonder when Mike after making the sculpture was under fire back then. Probably Mickey right now seeing this down from Heaven is thinking, "are these people fraking crazy"? Marge's banning crusade has turned into an epidemic completely out of control and worst of all made them truly blind to what's right and wrong.

    Marge does in the end does the right thing when she admits she was wrong and everything is back the way it was, it may not be perfect but at least it's right and strangely normal.

    And for Marge it was a small price to pay for her to see and enjoy a work of art which celebrates the beauty of life itself, which are what arts and entertainment are really and should be about.

    Rating: 4 stars.
  • This tongue in cheek portrayal of a parent's angst over children's television gets away from being simplistic and preachy. Of course, Itchy and Scratchy are as far out there as is possible. But we also know that the world is not a simply black and white place.
  • This episode is clearly intended to be a satire on the dangers of censorship-the point is make Marge seem hypocritical for being OK with nudity in classic art (i.e. Michelangelo's David) but not OK with violence in cartoons (i.e. Itchy & Scratchy). It doesn't really work for a couple of reasons. First, and most critically, nothing Marge did was "censorship" in the manner that is concerning. She merely organized private individuals to engage in criticism of the content of speech (i.e. Free speech itself) and lead a successful boycott of a media property (i.e. Freedom of association). This isn't censorship; it's the marketplace of ideas at work. To make the point the writers were trying to make Marge should have pressured the city of Springfield to shut down I&S studios.

    The second issue with the satire is the writers grant that Marge is in fact right about Itchy & Scratchy causing violence. Homer, and multiple other characters, were attacked because of their kids being inspired by the cartoon. (This is reinforced by Maggie giving Homer lemonade when I&S become "nice.") I'm pretty sure this episode was loosely inspired by the backlash to rap and/or violence in video games of the early 90's which made kids acting out the media a key argument. We still don't really know to what-if any-extent violent media causes kids to be violent. It strikes me as stacking the deck against their own position for the writers to structure the plot in this way.

    Finally, there is no hypocrisy on Marge's part-despite that writers have her fold like a cheap suit. The final scene conflates the right to speak with the content of that speech. Marge-never-attacked anyone's right to speak; she never advocated for the state to intervene. She criticized the content of speech. Moreover, it is peculiarly Puritan to conflate nudity with sexual, erotic and to conflate sexuality with violence. There are any number of reason why a person might be OK with their kids (or themselves for that matter) seeing Michelangelo's David but not watching Itchy & Scratchy. The line is drawn somewhere for everyone. There is no hypocrisy in saying both media works can be in the marketplace but I won't buy the cartoons and won't be sad if it fails.

    The episode itself has a couple a good zingers and I like the focus on Marge. I adore the return to innocence sequence but I can't get pass just how badly conceived the plot is in this episode.
  • Interesting that sometimes the campaign can be more fun than the results.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This episode of the Simpsons is a classic, and deals with censorship in media that's for a younger audience. Marge wants to ban cartoon violence in Itchy and Scratchy after witnessing Maggie emulate the violent acts the cartoon mouse does to the cat on Homer, from using a hammer, to a pencil to attack him. She complains to the directors and bans Lisa and Bart from watching Krusty which shows the cartoon. After that happens, the Itchy and Scratchy cartoon gets changed to become non violent, she allows Bart and Lisa to watch again, but since the cartoon has changed for the worse to them, they decided to find something else to do, as well as every kid in the town. They all gave up watching TV to do other things outside.

    People then complain about a famous sculpture, and Marge didn't see anything wrong with it, almost similar to how she complained about the violence in Itchy and Scratchy. She then gave up protesting on cartoon violence, but she then realized that kids including Bart and Lisa are just sitting watching TV watching a cartoon cat and mouse do violence against each other. A classic that covers censorship on TV violence and how parents complain about kids doing less activities outside and spending time on TV, just as things are in the real world with censorship and parents complaining about kids spending time more on electronic devices and TV.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I love this episode. It really shows that parents try to make everything kid friendly. The message that Censorship is something that is hard to censor and how people who try and fight one form of art, but like another art that is also that kids shouldn't see and makes them look like a Hcritic.

    The reason this episode it's hard for me to watch is because Marge is one of my favourite Simpsons character. While yes, she actually learns her listen and learns she can be a H-Critic. It'd just an episode that makes it hard for me to care for her. I do like that she learns her listen. But the first half is just super hard for me to watch. But, I do understand this is a good form to show that her is character does have flaws.

    Anyways, I give this episode an 8/10.
  • gianmarcoronconi25 May 2022
    9/10
    Nice
    Episode of criticism to criticism that in a light and fun way manages to make us understand how all things should be contextualized and also give us a good reason to be against the mothers movement.
  • Marge starts a crusade against cartoon violence.

    This is a very strong episode with great satire and memorable moments.

    The story is very good, with a pretty balanced take on the influence of television and (importantly) the humour does not get lost in the weight of the issues.

    My favourite segment by far is the moment Springfield turns into a utopia when the children stop watching television. Plus the running gag of Maggie always attacking Homer is very funny.

    Alex Rocco is great as the guest character Roger Meyers Jr.
  • It's nice to see a Marge centred episode, and the show taking a swipe at censorship.

    While it's not one of my favourite episodes, this does have a lot of good moments in it, and some lovely funny lines.