The Tudors (2007–2010)

TV Series   |  TV-MA   |    |  Drama, History, Romance


Episode Guide
The Tudors (2007) Poster

A dramatic series about the reign and marriages of King Henry VIII.

TIP
Add this title to your Watchlist
Save movies and shows to keep track of what you want to watch.

8.1/10
62,722

Videos


Photos

  • David Alpay at an event for The Tudors (2007)
  • Henry Cavill in The Tudors (2007)
  • James Frain in The Tudors (2007)
  • Jonathan Rhys Meyers at an event for The Tudors (2007)
  • Jonathan Rhys Meyers and Annabelle Wallis in The Tudors (2007)
  • Peter O'Toole at an event for The Tudors (2007)

See all photos

More of What You Love

Find what you're looking for even quicker with the IMDb app on your smartphone or tablet.

Get the IMDb app

Cast & Crew

Top Series Cast



Creator:

Michael Hirst

Reviews & Commentary

Add a Review


User Reviews


25 April 2007 | reesieg
6
| Exciting, but founders on miscast Henry & historical inaccuracy
I'm glad to see Showtime taking on the Tudor era, even if they are doing it because Henry's life is a tabloid-seller's dream come true, and our culture is tabloid-obsessed.

I love the casting of Jeremy Northam (Sir Thomas More) and Sam Neill (Cardinal Wolsey).

I read an earlier comment after I had already expressed the following thought elsewhere, and I completely agree -- Steven Waddington (Buckingham) would have been a better Henry VIII - he's bigger (he properly fills the screen, which in various shots J R-M painfully cannot, either in height or breadth); red-haired (as Henry was); and a POWERFUL, mesmerizing actor who's a better age for the part. (J R-M's eyes are riveting, but that's not enough for the part b/c at this stage of Henry's life, his fame was largely due to his physical dominance, learning & musical skill.) Showtime seems to be trying to appeal to a VERY young, VH-1 audience with the J R-M casting. Or, as they suggest, to people who don't know the story.

That's my second issue - don't suggest in the ads that you're going to tell the REAL story when you're not. Some dramatic license is expected (like flipping France for Portgual b/c they introduced Francis I early on) but there is no GOOD excuse for making a composite of Henry's sisters by telling Princess Mary Rose Tudor's story, but calling the character Princess Margaret, which was her older sister's name.

The real Margaret had a dramatic story, too -- and she's got the line to the current royal family through her great-granddaughter, Mary, Queen of Scots -- but they lost the chance to tell that by combining the sisters. Presumably they did it b/c they thought the audience was so dumb that we couldn't handle Henry's daughter and sister both being named Mary. Too bad.

Critic Reviews



Featured on IMDb

See what TV shows editors are excited about this month and check out our guide to Star Wars, video games, and more.

Around The Web

 | 

Powered by ZergNet

More To Explore

Search on Amazon.com