An epic Superman film one of the best ones that is incredibly well directed by Zack Snyder! Goes from explaining how Clark/Superman gets sent to earth because of his parents to the right amount of character development with Lois Lane and power along with epic action sequences. I've seen a few times even then I really liked it, this adaption deserves plenty of praise all around. The cast is excellent, beautiful cinematography, amazing story, emotions on point, and superb action!
3,195 Reviews
Ignore the critics
Sergiodave1 October 2021
I am old enough to have seen the original 2 Christopher Reeve Superman movies, and the idea of combining them is great. Henry Cavill is a better Superman, Amy Adams is a better Lois Lane, the script is far stronger, the baddies are more believable, I honestly can't understand the negatives; with the exception of the first 20 minutes, which just didn't work. A great attempt, far better than most DC movies, except the Nolan ones.
Very Good!
damianphelps28 November 2020
So we are looking at essentially a remake of Superman (nothing wrong with that).
So how does it compare? Favourably.
The original is perhaps a little softer, more romantic and more idyllic whereas the remake is darker, richer and a little more interesting.
2 changes that worked for me, the origin part of the story on Krypton which is much more expansive (creating more of a universe feel, literally) and the extended character of Superman Senior. Brando was the quintessential sci-fi 'head in a bottle' character using him to explain Supe's back story in the original, Crowe's character came full combat ready and I think it added well to the overall story.
Really enjoyable effort that sits well as a representative of the DC universe :)
The original is perhaps a little softer, more romantic and more idyllic whereas the remake is darker, richer and a little more interesting.
2 changes that worked for me, the origin part of the story on Krypton which is much more expansive (creating more of a universe feel, literally) and the extended character of Superman Senior. Brando was the quintessential sci-fi 'head in a bottle' character using him to explain Supe's back story in the original, Crowe's character came full combat ready and I think it added well to the overall story.
Really enjoyable effort that sits well as a representative of the DC universe :)
The Day I Stopped Trusting Critics
Hussein76325 December 2020
This movie was dishonestly mauled by critics and reviewers simply because it was directed by Snyder. Watching this again in 2020, I have to say this will go down as a classic in years to come. It's an absolute blast from start to finish and is one of the most loyal adaptations and faithful to the Superman lore found in DC comics. One of its greatest achievements was the magnificent depiction of Krypton and giving Zod the gravitas and motivation that he lacked in Superman II. You felt empathy for him. Shannon was outstanding in his portrayal of Zod; up there with Ledger's Joker.
I remember people actually complained about the level of destruction in this movie and the excessive use of special effects, but for me this is what makes a Superman movie. Take off your nostalgia tinted glasses and watch this with an open mind. This is the greatest Superman movie bar none.
I remember people actually complained about the level of destruction in this movie and the excessive use of special effects, but for me this is what makes a Superman movie. Take off your nostalgia tinted glasses and watch this with an open mind. This is the greatest Superman movie bar none.
An Epic Ride!
crimson_knight_721 July 2014
Warning: Spoilers
At first I was very nervous at the prospect of another Superman movie. Especially considering how horrible "Superman Returns" was; however, "Man of Steel" was a roller coaster of a ride as we not only witness Kal El's (Clark Kent's) origins, but we are shown Superman the way he is supposed to be.
With expert direction brought to us by Zack Snyder and the assistance of Christopher Nolan, "Man of Steel" is packed full of action and emotional depth. No Superman movie has ever come close to achieving the atmosphere illustrated in the comics or the cartoon series until Zack Snyder's "Man of Steel". Sure it has a lot of action, but anyone who is a true Superman fan knows that Kal El's battles were almost always explosively long. Furthermore, the biblical metaphors were absolutely brilliant! As Superman was intended to be portrayed as a "Christ Like" figure, you see his journey in "Man of Steel" not all that much different from the New Testament. (Ex: When Clark Kent asked the priest for advice, behind him was a stained glass window of Christ praying to His Father before He was arrested and crucified. Next scene Clark Kent willingly submits himself to be arrested, ascends into the "heavens", and than descends in a crucified form) As Superman's story is not about becoming the best, but an immigrant facing the challenge of home VS heritage, we see Zack Snyder's portrayal of Superman reflect the "Man of Steel" originally designed by Joseph Shuster.
Furthermore, who could forget such actors like Henry Cavill (Clark Kent),or Amy Adams (Lois Lane). Every actor in this movie left their mark, but I needed very little convincing to believe that Cavill was the face of Superman, or that Adams could be a persuasive Lois Lane. And although I am not particularly a fan of Michael Shannon, he was the perfect General Zod. With the level of ferocity Shannon provided, not to mention his one liners, this was by far his best role yet!
This movie soared through my expectations and it will be the first time I ever give a Superman movie a perfect 10!
With expert direction brought to us by Zack Snyder and the assistance of Christopher Nolan, "Man of Steel" is packed full of action and emotional depth. No Superman movie has ever come close to achieving the atmosphere illustrated in the comics or the cartoon series until Zack Snyder's "Man of Steel". Sure it has a lot of action, but anyone who is a true Superman fan knows that Kal El's battles were almost always explosively long. Furthermore, the biblical metaphors were absolutely brilliant! As Superman was intended to be portrayed as a "Christ Like" figure, you see his journey in "Man of Steel" not all that much different from the New Testament. (Ex: When Clark Kent asked the priest for advice, behind him was a stained glass window of Christ praying to His Father before He was arrested and crucified. Next scene Clark Kent willingly submits himself to be arrested, ascends into the "heavens", and than descends in a crucified form) As Superman's story is not about becoming the best, but an immigrant facing the challenge of home VS heritage, we see Zack Snyder's portrayal of Superman reflect the "Man of Steel" originally designed by Joseph Shuster.
Furthermore, who could forget such actors like Henry Cavill (Clark Kent),or Amy Adams (Lois Lane). Every actor in this movie left their mark, but I needed very little convincing to believe that Cavill was the face of Superman, or that Adams could be a persuasive Lois Lane. And although I am not particularly a fan of Michael Shannon, he was the perfect General Zod. With the level of ferocity Shannon provided, not to mention his one liners, this was by far his best role yet!
This movie soared through my expectations and it will be the first time I ever give a Superman movie a perfect 10!
What's with all the hate?! I LOVE MAN OF STEEL!!!
russellquisenberry11 September 2020
Am I one of the few people who actually love this movie? Man of Steel has beautiful visuals, an amazing cast ensemble, and action scenes to blow you away. The story is better than that awful Superman Returns movie and it's like the actors are doing their best. It's no Wonder Woman or Aquaman, but its a very fun watch and completely unforgettable!!
What Superman needed
SnoopyStyle2 June 2014
Warning: Spoilers
On the planet Krypton, Jor-El (Russell Crowe) is killed by General Zod (Michael Shannon) after he launches his son with the Codex of Kryptonian genetics to earth. Zod and his men are sentenced and imprisoned in the Phantom Zone. Soon after Krypton implodes. The baby is raised by the Kents (Diane Lane, Kevin Costner). Clark Kent (Henry Cavill) grows up to be a drifter hiding his powers from everybody. Then a spaceship is discovered in 18,000 years old ice. Lois Lane (Amy Adams) is there but Clark pilots it away. It's an earlier scout ship that the Kryptonians sent out. Kryptonians fell into population control and they abandoned space exploration. When Zod arrives on earth, Kal-El is the only hope.
This is a darker Superman which is exactly what the franchise needs. This should have been done by Bryan Singer for his reboot rather than trying to copy the Richard Donner version. This is not the Norman Rockwell painting version. Clark Kent is scruffy fisherman and not the boy scout. Even Pa Kent advises against using his powers when his schoolmates' lives are at stake. This is a true reboot.
The action looks quite good. Everything is expertly made. There is the Battlestar Galactica TV style of zooming in on the action. The designs look amazing. The hand to hand combat is pretty much all CGI. On one hand, I understand the superpower nature can only be done by CGI. On the other hand, I always prefer real stunts for human size combat. If there is one possible complain, the action doesn't take enough breaks. The audience needs a few more quiet breaks to catch their breath. The action may be too overwhelming.
Quite frankly, Superman no longer has the duo personality and he is simply the angst ridden hero. Henry Cavill does a solid job delivering the needed performance. It's not until the end does he become nerdy reporter. The brilliant Michael Shannon does a superb job as General Zod. Overall, this is a solid launching point for a new series of DC comics movies.
This is a darker Superman which is exactly what the franchise needs. This should have been done by Bryan Singer for his reboot rather than trying to copy the Richard Donner version. This is not the Norman Rockwell painting version. Clark Kent is scruffy fisherman and not the boy scout. Even Pa Kent advises against using his powers when his schoolmates' lives are at stake. This is a true reboot.
The action looks quite good. Everything is expertly made. There is the Battlestar Galactica TV style of zooming in on the action. The designs look amazing. The hand to hand combat is pretty much all CGI. On one hand, I understand the superpower nature can only be done by CGI. On the other hand, I always prefer real stunts for human size combat. If there is one possible complain, the action doesn't take enough breaks. The audience needs a few more quiet breaks to catch their breath. The action may be too overwhelming.
Quite frankly, Superman no longer has the duo personality and he is simply the angst ridden hero. Henry Cavill does a solid job delivering the needed performance. It's not until the end does he become nerdy reporter. The brilliant Michael Shannon does a superb job as General Zod. Overall, this is a solid launching point for a new series of DC comics movies.
Best Superman to Date
insearchof-384029 April 2020
I love Superman. Every version. I'll defend Superman 4 if you want? But this is the definitive version. The version I've always dreamed of seeing - the version I'd write if I could have. Challenging, thought-provoking, insightful. Not there to be a poster child, but rather to be an inspiration. Inspiration comes through internal struggle and strife, not through BANG BANG, POW POW. I wish DC had more faith in this storyline - cause it was clearly going somewhere wonderful. #ReleaseTheSnyderCut.
Henry makes the best Superman!
bellab19722 September 2022
I do agree this movie could be better like Lois being more believable and it not being so loud but overall it's a really good movie! Henry is the best Superman and I grew up watching Christopher Reed as Superman and now it would be impossible to watch anyone else as Superman! Henry has the perfect look, has the perfect personality being humble, intelligent and level headed and just comes across as SUPER!
I won't go into details of the movie because it's been 9 years since the release and others have outlined the storyline many times.
Man of Steel is entertaining and that's what we want and thankfully there isn't are no woke messages which is even better and we can't get away from now!
I won't go into details of the movie because it's been 9 years since the release and others have outlined the storyline many times.
Man of Steel is entertaining and that's what we want and thankfully there isn't are no woke messages which is even better and we can't get away from now!
"Welcome to the Planet".
classicsoncall29 March 2016
Warning: Spoilers
I'll be taking a somewhat different approach I think, than most reviewers here. When it comes to super-hero movies, I'm not dazzled all that much by the over the top action sequences and the inevitable destruction they bring to the big screen. I'm more into character development and a compelling story line, so an early scene on the planet Krypton really intrigued me. It had to do with the Kryptonian high council and the way they saw themselves versus the population as a whole. The idea was best expressed by Jor-El (Russell Crowe), who decried a society that had lost it's element of choice. The elites of Krypton made decisions for the entire planet based on their status as 'knowing' what was best for their citizens. It sounded very much to me like a recipe for Communism, whereas Jor-El voiced his defiance in terms of a child aspiring to something greater, he saw individuals having the potential to be a force for good in the world, virtually impossible in the command and control society Krypton had evolved into. I thought that concept was rather fascinating, since you don't hear that very much from our own political leaders today.
I've long ago given up on the idea that modern films will honor the continuity of characters that originated decades ago, which makes it interesting to consider the origin of the 'S' on Superman's uniform. In both the Richard Donner directed "Superman" from 1978 and this picture, the 'S' symbol originated on the planet Krypton, once again with the character Jor-El. I believe he even intimated in this story that with Earth's atmosphere, Kal-El would grow up to be a super man among men. If my recollection of reading Silver Age Superman comics is correct, the 'S' was originally an idea that Ma Kent came up with when she fashioned his first set of clothes from the wreckage salvaged from the rocket that brought him to Earth. The rationale one has to accept in these reboots is is that Earthlings would interpret 'Superman' in the same manner and spell it with just the right letter.
So is Superman someone to be trusted or feared? The film seems to suggest that people's reaction to Superman would initially be one of fear, presumably fear of the unknown. There's some merit in that, but with all of his good works on Earth, I'm not sure I agree that one had to be wary of Superman's motives when challenged by General Zod (Michael Shannon). What doesn't help though, in giving movie goers what they want, is for Superman to engage in a battle with his enemy that takes out entire city blocks. That's an area that also diverges significantly from the early canon which insisted that Superman never harm or kill a living being. I know, times and tastes change, so belaboring this point is a meaningless exercise.
I think for my last point I'd like to make an observation that definitely suggests a post 9/11 influence. Prior to that horrendous event, epic battles didn't feature the same kind of destructive scenes that are on display here (as well as other recent movies). I refer to those scenes that elicit a subliminal recognition of the horror that occurred on that day, specifically to those rolling dust clouds that unwind down streets surrounded on both sides by canyon walls of high rise buildings, trapping the destruction within their outer walls. If you think back, probably the first time you ever saw something like that was when the Twin Towers fell and the images of destruction were broadcast for the entire world to see.
So my viewing of the picture the other day was in preparation for "Dawn of Justice" which follows the events here in linear fashion. I suspect and expect that the action in that film will attempt to outdo what we've seen here in terms of size and scope. Not completely necessary for this viewer, but I'll be there.
I've long ago given up on the idea that modern films will honor the continuity of characters that originated decades ago, which makes it interesting to consider the origin of the 'S' on Superman's uniform. In both the Richard Donner directed "Superman" from 1978 and this picture, the 'S' symbol originated on the planet Krypton, once again with the character Jor-El. I believe he even intimated in this story that with Earth's atmosphere, Kal-El would grow up to be a super man among men. If my recollection of reading Silver Age Superman comics is correct, the 'S' was originally an idea that Ma Kent came up with when she fashioned his first set of clothes from the wreckage salvaged from the rocket that brought him to Earth. The rationale one has to accept in these reboots is is that Earthlings would interpret 'Superman' in the same manner and spell it with just the right letter.
So is Superman someone to be trusted or feared? The film seems to suggest that people's reaction to Superman would initially be one of fear, presumably fear of the unknown. There's some merit in that, but with all of his good works on Earth, I'm not sure I agree that one had to be wary of Superman's motives when challenged by General Zod (Michael Shannon). What doesn't help though, in giving movie goers what they want, is for Superman to engage in a battle with his enemy that takes out entire city blocks. That's an area that also diverges significantly from the early canon which insisted that Superman never harm or kill a living being. I know, times and tastes change, so belaboring this point is a meaningless exercise.
I think for my last point I'd like to make an observation that definitely suggests a post 9/11 influence. Prior to that horrendous event, epic battles didn't feature the same kind of destructive scenes that are on display here (as well as other recent movies). I refer to those scenes that elicit a subliminal recognition of the horror that occurred on that day, specifically to those rolling dust clouds that unwind down streets surrounded on both sides by canyon walls of high rise buildings, trapping the destruction within their outer walls. If you think back, probably the first time you ever saw something like that was when the Twin Towers fell and the images of destruction were broadcast for the entire world to see.
So my viewing of the picture the other day was in preparation for "Dawn of Justice" which follows the events here in linear fashion. I suspect and expect that the action in that film will attempt to outdo what we've seen here in terms of size and scope. Not completely necessary for this viewer, but I'll be there.
Ahead of its time
deanmalakiy25 December 2020
I never had the opportunity to see this film in theatres, though, after my first viewing at home, I was instantly blown away by the tone, visuals, soundtrack, story, performance, thriller and action to this film.
Man of steel truely felt as though it was an alien invasion film set in our present time.
Superman has literally searched to find himself and when he does, he must learn not only learn his origins, though his abilities and how to use them.
He was bound to question himself and make mistakes along the way and following his journey is something I'm extremely excited for.
Most certainly a superhero film for adults.
Man of steel truely felt as though it was an alien invasion film set in our present time.
Superman has literally searched to find himself and when he does, he must learn not only learn his origins, though his abilities and how to use them.
He was bound to question himself and make mistakes along the way and following his journey is something I'm extremely excited for.
Most certainly a superhero film for adults.
This is unlike any Superman before...
paul_haakonsen25 October 2013
I am not overly fond of superhero movies in general, but still I watch them, as I am a movie aficionado. And I must confess that "Man of Steel" is actually the best superhero movie that I have seen.
This is not the child-approved adventure that Superman was back in the Christopher Reeve era - during which I grew up with those particular movies - and nor is it anywhere near "Superman Returns". "Man of Steel" quite simply pushes the entire boundary of what the audience is used to in the previous movies.
"Man of Steel" is a Superman movie for grown ups, and it really does appeal to an adult audience. The story is darker and delivers a harder punch, no pun intended, than any previous Superman movies. And the level of destruction and mayhem present in this movie is just simply off the charts. And for that alone, the movie is well worth watching.
These constant reboots of previously established movies is annoying to a great extend, and the same goes for "Man of Steel". Was it really necessary to tell the story of Supermans trip to Earth and his upbringing here? No, not really. But still, the movie was entertaining, because it was a more serious and gloomy universe that the audience was introduced to.
And while we are on the topic of reboots, then why use General Zod and his henchmen again? These were in a Christopher Reeve Superman movie already and were bested even there. So why reinvent them and use them again? I just don't get that. But thumbs up for the characters, their outfits and their more menacing and brutal demeanor.
I wasn't familiar with Henry Cavill at all, and must admit that it is good that they are finally moving away from the Christopher Reeve era and anything that looks like him (hint, hint, the "Superman Returns" movie). It was a bold move, sure, but one that will essentially bring about a great new touch and inspiration to the Superman franchise.
"Man of Steel" is action and excitement from start to finish. And even Russell Crowe and Kevin Costner performed quite well in this movie.
I can warmly recommend that you sit down and watch "Man of Steel", it is a much needed breath of fresh air in the superhero genre.
And what is up with the hype about these so-called 'easter eggs' in the movie? Come on, get over it. It is a movie meant for entertainment, this is not rocket science.
Strap in for an action-filled and adrenaline-filled ride of a movie.
This is not the child-approved adventure that Superman was back in the Christopher Reeve era - during which I grew up with those particular movies - and nor is it anywhere near "Superman Returns". "Man of Steel" quite simply pushes the entire boundary of what the audience is used to in the previous movies.
"Man of Steel" is a Superman movie for grown ups, and it really does appeal to an adult audience. The story is darker and delivers a harder punch, no pun intended, than any previous Superman movies. And the level of destruction and mayhem present in this movie is just simply off the charts. And for that alone, the movie is well worth watching.
These constant reboots of previously established movies is annoying to a great extend, and the same goes for "Man of Steel". Was it really necessary to tell the story of Supermans trip to Earth and his upbringing here? No, not really. But still, the movie was entertaining, because it was a more serious and gloomy universe that the audience was introduced to.
And while we are on the topic of reboots, then why use General Zod and his henchmen again? These were in a Christopher Reeve Superman movie already and were bested even there. So why reinvent them and use them again? I just don't get that. But thumbs up for the characters, their outfits and their more menacing and brutal demeanor.
I wasn't familiar with Henry Cavill at all, and must admit that it is good that they are finally moving away from the Christopher Reeve era and anything that looks like him (hint, hint, the "Superman Returns" movie). It was a bold move, sure, but one that will essentially bring about a great new touch and inspiration to the Superman franchise.
"Man of Steel" is action and excitement from start to finish. And even Russell Crowe and Kevin Costner performed quite well in this movie.
I can warmly recommend that you sit down and watch "Man of Steel", it is a much needed breath of fresh air in the superhero genre.
And what is up with the hype about these so-called 'easter eggs' in the movie? Come on, get over it. It is a movie meant for entertainment, this is not rocket science.
Strap in for an action-filled and adrenaline-filled ride of a movie.
Incredibly epic origin story
masonsaul1 April 2020
Man of Steel is an incredibly epic origin story for Superman that's emotional and action packed, even though there is a little too much destruction in the third act. Henry Cavill is great as Superman. Amy Adams, Kevin Costner, Diane Lane, Russell Crowe and Michael Shannon are all great as well. Zack Snyder's direction is fantastic and the film is extremely well filmed with amazing action sequences. It's well paced and the CG is consistently stunning. The music by Hans Zimmer is incredible.
How Could They Do this to Superman?!?!
Hitchcoc3 January 2014
As usual, I find that for some when a movie is made about a super-hero, it has to fit into some pigeonhole, determined by years of comic books. God forbid that someone tries to find a different angle or a new approach. As usual, there is all this nit-picking about details that don't seem real. For heaven's sake, the guy can fly, comes as a baby from another planet, and can go back and forth in time. Let's check the reality thing right now. There have been so many reviews of this that I doubt I can contribute much that is new, but for me, the guy was a multi-dimensional character who has to deal with a hand that is dealt to him. I'm waiting for Superman XIX, "Superman on the Psychiatrist's Couch." The guy must have incredible angst during his private moments and feel the weight of the world. Anyway, the acting is quite good, there is lots of action, and under the circumstances, he seems pretty real.
Criminally Underrated
sivam-6690220 October 2020
It is the most criminally Underrated superhero movie ever. It's also the movie that made me love Superman .Zack Snyder best work and Hans Zimmer was amazing. Visuals , Storytelling and Action scene were top notch .Too bad this movie did not get a proper sequel
SPOILERS:this movie is incredibly underrated!
cristiandelgado-726031 July 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Caution: spoilers may abound. I think this movie is severely underrated. Most complaints I see are of people who can't let go of the vision of superman they got from Christopher reeve who played a superman who was a god among men who never made mistakes and always knew what to do. That's not someone we relate to in this day and age because in our cynical and jaded society it's impossible to be that morally upright. I like Henry Cavill's superman because he plays a man who has to learn how to be superman. He's not perfect out the gate and he doesn't automatically know how to handle every situation right out the gate. Because of this a lot of lives are lost in the battle of metropolis and superman is forced to end zod because there is no other recourse because there is no way to contain him on earth with all the kryptonian tech is destroyed. Whatever you can say about how believable it is that superman didn't have a choice it's still set up well. Krypton was very beautiful and Russell Crowe made a great jor el. As far as the plot for the movie I understand the criticism that the flashbacks don't make sense but I think the death of Jonathan Kent is done very well because it's a sacrifice intended to keep Clark undercover. All in all its not perfect but it's far from terrible.
The soundtrack is epic.
vessalalizadeh26 November 2021
Henry Cavil is my Superman. He's the best Superman ever. Interesting story, with deep meanings and realism. The camera work is not so good, some parts is good but others it feels like a Michael Bay film. The action sequences are pretty intense and excessive. However the soundtrack is probably the best thing of the movie. I've told it again, Hans Zimmer is a brilliant worker in music. The music names of the movie that I really love is:
Flight Sent here for a reason If you love these people What are you going to do when you're not saving the world?
Look to the stars
Just beautifully pieces in my ears. Overall the movie could have been much better, but I appreciate that it's underrated. For me, the best scene of the entire movie is when Superman learns how to fly in the first time. Just, a masterpiece scene.
Flight Sent here for a reason If you love these people What are you going to do when you're not saving the world?
Look to the stars
Just beautifully pieces in my ears. Overall the movie could have been much better, but I appreciate that it's underrated. For me, the best scene of the entire movie is when Superman learns how to fly in the first time. Just, a masterpiece scene.
much better than superman returns
erminahotmail8 November 2023
Warning: Spoilers
So after the disappointing Superman Returns so Warner Bros decided to launch a Reboot and so in 2013, directed by Zack Snyder, Man of Steel was released So I know that this film was not at all appreciated by critics but for me it will always remain oneunderrated films but this time let's talk about the negative points I don't like the mix between present and past it mixed too much in this film then Clark Kent's adventure It's completely useless another negative point Zod's helper I found him quite a character annoying and then whenhe fights against Superman and holds his head but after this character is killed by the explosion of a heliodenser which is very bad another negative point when Clark when he is at school gets punched by a student But this is not possible I understand that he doesn't know he has the powers but himhe could have Because if he punched Clark I would break my hand And these And these are the negative things about this film but now let's move on to the positive ones starting with Henry Cavill I found this actor of the role of Superman really very good but as usual always thebest always remains every day Christopher Reeve an act positive point jor he is truly an important character in this film given that the original one only showed a moment and he no longer appears now he appears a lot of times for Chiara to remember in another pointpositive general Zod beautiful villain who wanted to build a place for the survivors of the planet krypton in any way another positive point the special effects this time are done very well compared to those of superman returns But I can tell you some things that I don't really agree withthat all the people who always criticize don't believe that Superman makes a disaster jump in the city But seriously think like that because a superhero isn't just made of roses and flowers so it's impossible that he does delicate things Superman doesn't force Zod to move to a another place and I'll tell youwhy Zod really didn't want to move since he is fond of this place so he was here to make him suffer but another thing that I don't really agree with that everyone has always repeated is that Henry Cavill is not a good Superman because in the end end kills But sorry but thenin the previous films what did Superman do he killed other people in the previous films he for example killed the Krypton trio the bad Superman in metric computer core Man is Lex's henchmen and he didn't kill them because here Rock indicates the worst it's for this reason that thisfilm must be underrated
to conclude rating 8.5.
Best Superman Movie Ever Made
vlix-1338610 April 2020
This is what I've been waiting for my whole life - a Superman film that tackles big issues, big ideas and takes risks. I've liked every superman film I've ever seen - but this one felt like it finally lived up to the potential of the character. 11 stars if I could.
Best Superman Movie to Date
votedavepurdy5 January 2019
Warning: Spoilers
For those who disliked this movie, what is it you want? Depth to a story, development for the background characters that define Superman, incredible cinematography, and an epic superhero battle unlike anything ever seen before? I've always found it interesting that 2 of the best Superman films, Superman Returns and this movie, are often torn apart by people that have no idea what they're talking about. Stop the hate! Make some popcorn and enjoy!
Gets better with time
concrndone26 September 2021
I think this was the last superhero movie I liked. It looks and feels like it's set in the real world still instead of somebody's computer.
The story is tripe but what do you expect? Visually it's excellent.
Maybe could do with a bit more colour.
The story is tripe but what do you expect? Visually it's excellent.
Maybe could do with a bit more colour.
"Welcome to the Planet"
LeonLouisRicci9 July 2014
Superman in the Age of Reason, Science, and Clear Thinking is Referenced as a Pop Culture "Saviour" sent to Earth to Guide Mankind Toward "The better Angels of our nature". The Jesus Metaphors are not Absent in this Most Modern of Reboots, there are some Blatant Correlations.
This is a Demolition Derby of a Movie. Could be the Angst of 9/11 Still Haunts and there are Human Casualties in the Film that is Estimated to be a Few Thousand.
The Film in the Hands of Director Zack Snyder may be Destructive to Some and an Adrenaline Shot of Entertainment for Others. Superman has Always had His Detractors both In and Out of Fandom. He has been Called a Boy Scout, a Boring, Virtually Indestructible Entity that Strains for Drama.
The Movie can Repeat Itself and in the End might go on for Far Too Long and it may not Know when to Quit. But the Opening on Krypton is Impressive and the Invasion on Earth has its Moments of High Tech Wonder. Actually it could have Pulled Back a Little Without Loss.
It Also could have used More Edgy but Subtle Stuff like Superman's Paypack to a Bully Truck Driver in a Diner. That Simple Shot when Clark Leaves and a Static Image of a Semi has as Much Power as Any with Planes, Disintegrating Buildings, and Space Ships.
Overall, the Star Studded Cast Play Their Parts as Expected and Michael Shannon Looks Evil without Even Trying and Henry Cavill as Superman Feels Deep Enough Psychologically and Built Up Enough Physically to Look the Part.
Not a Bad Resurrection for the First Super-Hero in Comic Books. His Initial Appearance (1938) was in Action Comics. It Could be Argued the Filmmakers for this Movie took that Title Literally.
This is a Demolition Derby of a Movie. Could be the Angst of 9/11 Still Haunts and there are Human Casualties in the Film that is Estimated to be a Few Thousand.
The Film in the Hands of Director Zack Snyder may be Destructive to Some and an Adrenaline Shot of Entertainment for Others. Superman has Always had His Detractors both In and Out of Fandom. He has been Called a Boy Scout, a Boring, Virtually Indestructible Entity that Strains for Drama.
The Movie can Repeat Itself and in the End might go on for Far Too Long and it may not Know when to Quit. But the Opening on Krypton is Impressive and the Invasion on Earth has its Moments of High Tech Wonder. Actually it could have Pulled Back a Little Without Loss.
It Also could have used More Edgy but Subtle Stuff like Superman's Paypack to a Bully Truck Driver in a Diner. That Simple Shot when Clark Leaves and a Static Image of a Semi has as Much Power as Any with Planes, Disintegrating Buildings, and Space Ships.
Overall, the Star Studded Cast Play Their Parts as Expected and Michael Shannon Looks Evil without Even Trying and Henry Cavill as Superman Feels Deep Enough Psychologically and Built Up Enough Physically to Look the Part.
Not a Bad Resurrection for the First Super-Hero in Comic Books. His Initial Appearance (1938) was in Action Comics. It Could be Argued the Filmmakers for this Movie took that Title Literally.
A truly amazing film
Gordon-1128 June 2013
This film is about how Clark Kent grew up on Earth, and how he battles with the evil General from Krypton to save the Earth.
"Man of Steel" completely blew me away. Firstly the visual effects are really amazing. Almost every scene is made up of splendid computer effects. The extra terrestrial futuristic battles in the beginning is already spectacular, but it only gets better. Later in the film, the destruction of a metropolis on a never before seen scale and in such vivid detail, that I was completely entranced.
It's easy for the abundance of special effects to drown out the plot, but fortunately that was not the case. The story spans a long time, with characters time to be developed and to make an impact on the viewers. I was drawn to Russell Crowe's integrity and his determination to save his planet, and I was impressed by Amy Adams' pursuit of the truth. Henry Cavill's superman is a very engaging character, he really shows the pain of growing up different. The human side of the plot is told very well, touching heart strings that ultimately make the emotional climax even more effective.
After the film, I felt almost weak from exhaustion of adrenaline, and any other brain chemicals that the film had me firing. It's such a powerful film that never ceases to amaze and inspire awe.
"Man of Steel" completely blew me away. Firstly the visual effects are really amazing. Almost every scene is made up of splendid computer effects. The extra terrestrial futuristic battles in the beginning is already spectacular, but it only gets better. Later in the film, the destruction of a metropolis on a never before seen scale and in such vivid detail, that I was completely entranced.
It's easy for the abundance of special effects to drown out the plot, but fortunately that was not the case. The story spans a long time, with characters time to be developed and to make an impact on the viewers. I was drawn to Russell Crowe's integrity and his determination to save his planet, and I was impressed by Amy Adams' pursuit of the truth. Henry Cavill's superman is a very engaging character, he really shows the pain of growing up different. The human side of the plot is told very well, touching heart strings that ultimately make the emotional climax even more effective.
After the film, I felt almost weak from exhaustion of adrenaline, and any other brain chemicals that the film had me firing. It's such a powerful film that never ceases to amaze and inspire awe.
What a Superman movie should be...
cmansell-2997622 November 2020
A modern and updated take on Superman, man of steel is thrilling, thoughtful and incredibly rich and vibrant. The opening krypton scene alone is worth the price of admission and is absolutely breathtaking. There are complaints from people too stuck in the past to get over Christopher Reeves. Complaints of pacing, and too much action. Clearly these people have never read a comic, this is the definitive comic book movie because it plays out like a comic, how can any TRUE fan not love that?
The cast is Phenomenal, Henry Cavill is the physical embodiment of what the Superman of a modern age should be. He's thoughtful, compassionate and selfless, yet feels wildly out of place and yearns for acceptance and to find his place in the world. And he just looks like he could demolish a skyscraper with one punch. Shannon is fantastic as Zod, the tyrannical general consumed with Kryptons resurrection. Crowe shines as Jor-El, the guiding hand and hopeful father of Kal, I only hope we get to see more of him in future stories. Costner is great as the voice of caution, the worried parent desperately hoping to keep the world from taking his son away for being different. All in all this is a fantastic movie, we even get glimpses of a more self assured and even cocky Superman when he allows the authorities to handcuff him and the scene with the drone at the very end. If only the studios would have stayed out of things and allowed a true sequel to come organically, rather than push to catch up with Marvel.
At least now with the Snyder cut coming, we may get to see that.
Even for Marvel fans this is a must GO!
illmor-814-20478412 June 2013
The trailers of this movie were released in a so effective way that you start to fear if the product will fill your expectations. And with the usual critics-know-about-everything-nothing-is-good- to-me reviews the chances of be confused about this are increasing. As high as the expectations were raised after trailers, i have to tell you that you will not disappointed with this movie. Is different in many ways to the usual superhero movies but is a solid product that fits in what you expect from this kind of film. Nice references to previous movies are well executed and new plot additions are well received too. As you can expect from a Zack Snyder movie, there are several scenes that try to resemble graphic novel arts and in my opinion are very well made. Some of the nicest things about this movie is the way they made the fast moving scenes. The most of them (unfortunately i can't say all of them) look very realistic according laws of physics, the CGI are so well made that you wish that development for many movies you seen before. The movements are what you expect if such kind of people exist in reality.
About the plot, i believe this is the more controversial point of what i see in reviews across the internet. Most moviegoers like it a lot, but are critics the ones ( not all of them) that are giving mixed reviews. What you realize is that critics expect another Dark Knight but this movie is not looking to be a darker one of your beloved Superman. If you are smart enough to understand that this is ANOTHER hero you will be happy with the story. If you are looking for a fourth darker than Batman movie for sure you will agree with critics giving bad reviews. This is a Superman movie and in that scenario this is a very good one.
The movie has some flaws to me for sure ( i don't know about a perfect movie) but i will not comment about that as i believe everyone need to discover by themselves what - if any- dislike for their preferences.
In summary this is a super hero movie that even Marvel fans will appreciate as is giving a whole new level to a classic story, turning the most beloved hero in an actual hero and mixing a great graphic novel specialist with great digital artists to give you a full action packed movie that make a good foundations for sequels.
About the plot, i believe this is the more controversial point of what i see in reviews across the internet. Most moviegoers like it a lot, but are critics the ones ( not all of them) that are giving mixed reviews. What you realize is that critics expect another Dark Knight but this movie is not looking to be a darker one of your beloved Superman. If you are smart enough to understand that this is ANOTHER hero you will be happy with the story. If you are looking for a fourth darker than Batman movie for sure you will agree with critics giving bad reviews. This is a Superman movie and in that scenario this is a very good one.
The movie has some flaws to me for sure ( i don't know about a perfect movie) but i will not comment about that as i believe everyone need to discover by themselves what - if any- dislike for their preferences.
In summary this is a super hero movie that even Marvel fans will appreciate as is giving a whole new level to a classic story, turning the most beloved hero in an actual hero and mixing a great graphic novel specialist with great digital artists to give you a full action packed movie that make a good foundations for sequels.
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews