User Reviews (89)

Add a Review

  • In 1431, the Kingdom of Ayutthayan conquers the territory of Sukhothai expanding their lands to East. The noble Lord Siha Decho is betrayed by his Captain Rajasena and is murdered together with his wife. However their son Tien is saved by one loyal soldier and left alone in the woods. Later he is captured by slave traders but he is rescued by Chernang, the leader of a group of thieves from Garuda Wing. He learns martial arts and arms and becomes a leader of the thieves, but he leaves the gang seeking revenge against Rajasena.

    "Ong Bak 2" is a good epic, with a non-original storyline but a magnificent choreography of fights and art direction. The plot is predictable but very entertaining, supported by the ability of Tony Jaa in martial arts, and the conclusion seems to be the beginning of an unnecessary sequel. My vote is eight.

    Title (Brazil): "Ong-Bak 2"
  • There's no doubt I've been a fan of movies starring Tony Jaa with the likes of Ong Bak and Tom Yum Goong being showcases for the Muay Thai brand of martial arts, and I fondly remember those hard hitting action sequences that left me gaping, as well as the numerous replays just to drum it through to you that it's all Jaa and it's all as incredible as can be. And who can forget the latter film with that amazing single take where Jaa had to pound his way from the bottom of a building right to the top? Ong Bak 2 is a film fans like myself have been waiting for, despite it being marred by some really strange controversy, which also included Jaa walking off the set and disappearing from production. But everything's been sorted I guess, for the film to be completed and finally released.

    While it's rocking the box office in Thailand, I wonder whether it's because of the controversies that had piqued everyone's interest, or it's because the long break of 3 years had made everyone salivate at Jaa's long awaited return to the big screen. I wonder because while there are numerous moments in the film that I thoroughly enjoyed, I felt that it fell short too on other areas that had left me shifting in my seat, especially during the first hour.

    And the biggest culprit of it all, would be the ending. Tony Jaa wrote this story, and credit to him too in trying to weave together some semblance of a worthy story instead of the more obvious and easier whack-fest end to end. But the ending was somewhat of a cop out, and a disappointment, as it leads potentially and very directly to a third movie to resolve the issues the storyline had left hanging. It could have easily stretched it to say, 20 minutes more to get everything settled, but I guess there were grander plans to the tale that needed another movie to tell. One only wishes that it does get made sooner rather than later, and without the production woes that plagued this one.

    So Ong Bak 2 is actually half a movie, and given that it's a totally new story to begin with, I thought it would make better sense in retitling it, rather than to have a misnomer that it's a sequel. After all, the setting is now back in 15th century Thailand with totally new characters, with Jaa playing Tien, a man of royal lineage who's trying to avenge the death of his parents and entire household under the hands of rival warlords, and a masked man who delivered the killing blow to his dad. The first half of the movie had him learn from a band of bandits called the Garuda Wing Cliff, where a number of highly skilled exponents teach him all there is to know about their respective fields. I remembered having read somewhere that there's supposed to be some fusion of dance and martial arts, which didn't transpire in this film as far as I can tell (the dance/action sequence here doesn't make the cut), so it might be left for the next movie instead.

    Compared to the other Tony Jaa movies, you can see that the production values here have been ramped up tremendously.Techniques have also matured, and gone are the repetitive playbacks. But that doesn't mean you're going to lose out, because like any self-respecting martial arts film, the camera stays still when it should be and at a sane distance away to capture all the action comfortably, and the editing doesn't cut in and mess up the sequence.

    While the filmmaker in Tony Jaa would have matured with this outing (he co-directed this), his maturity as a martial artist on film is now without a doubt. We only get flashes of his Muay Thai when it calls for some close combat involving elbows and knees right smack in the kisser, otherwise we see Jaa as a more complete martial arts practitioner with the employment of a vast array of weapons, from swords to three-section-staffs, and a host of recognizable kung-fu moves, one which also pays homage to the Drunken Fists, and I applaud Jaa's rendition of it too. As for the revered elephant, you know it's never far behind, and there's one thrilling battle atop the large mammal, with Dan(ce) Chupong no less, albeit hidden behind a mask.

    Ong Bak 2 picked up very slowly, and spent significant time developing the back story of Jaa's Tien. And unfortunately, I do admit unabashedly that I was waiting for action sequence one after another, and those in the same boat will have to be patient. For action junkies, your appetite will only be satiated in the last act of the film, where it's vintage Jaa as he dishes out punishment, and receives much of the same in return. I detested the ending which wrapped everything up so conveniently (I don't buy the Karma bit), or left subplots such as the romantic angle as something to be dwelled upon later (though I believe romance never really was an issue at all in Jaa's movies), leaving doors wide open for another film.

    Perhaps I should reserve my judgement of it until the next movie completes the story? So at this moment, we can still enjoy what Tony Jaa has prepared for action fans worldwide – a showcase that he's not just all about Muay Thai, but a bona fide action hero who's the real deal, crafting a myriad of incredible fight sequences that would still leave your mouth gaping wide open.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This exciting, blood-drenched, historical revenge yarn about pugnacious Thai empires set in the 15th century qualifies as an in-name only sequel to Tony Jaa's "Ong Bak" (2003) with the acrobatic Jaa making his directorial debut. Action choreographer Panna Rittikrai of "Chocolate" lends Jaa a hand and the two of stage some incredible jaw-dropping, death-defying, gravity-flouting martial arts combat. In the war-torn kingdom of Ayudhaya, our hero Tien is the son of a slain nobleman Siha Decho, and he rarely has time to do anything but fight for his life during this exhilarating 98-minute epic. Most of this action-packed tale takes place in flashback and the narrative is often difficult to follow, but the action scenes compensate for this shortcoming. Initially, our agile, adolescent hero is captured by dastardly slavers and hurled into a murky mud pit with only his bare hands and his wits to battle a ferocious crocodile. This is a pretty terrifying scene but everything looks fairly realistic. While the young Tien is playing cat-and-mouse with the croc, another man, Chernang (Sorapong Chatree of "The Tsunami Warrior"), admires the urchin's audacity in the face of peril. Chernang is the chieftain of the Garuda Wing Cliff bandits. He intervenes to save Tien's life and slings the kid a sword to slash the croc. Afterward, a blind seer utters some mighty impressive declarations about the kid's future, and Tien finds himself learning how to become a champion. In the process, as he grows up, the long-haired Tien learns all kinds of arcane martial arts combat. Just watching the nimble choreography in the fighting scene will make you work up a sweat. In fact, Jarr created a new kind of fisticuffs that blends dancing with fighting and calls it 'Nataytuh.' Bangkok-born superstar Tony Jarr is truly the successor to Jet Li, Jackie Chan, and Bruce Lee. The elephant stampede scene with Jarr dashing across the backs of these lofty beasts as they trample the earth looks spectacular. Later, after our hero asserts himself over them, the entire herd bows down to him.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I just saw this movie, and I completely amazed by it. Tony Jaa is one of the most talented, most gifted martial artist in the entire planet, the best since Bruce Lee or the young Jackie Chan. When I saw the Ong bak (2003) I was literally went nuts. The fighting scenes were more then awesome, that was something new, something that you didn't see every day. Then came the Protector. More and even better action, more fury, and more fun. "Okay." - I wondered - "How can they top this?" I mean you saw Tony Jaa kickin' ass, and kickin' more ass, what's next? Go back to the golden ages of martial art flicks and see how an instant classic movie done. Now you have Tony Jaa as a director and a star. The movie takes years and years ago, and it's about a young martial artist. The camera work is superb, the soundtrack is fantastic and the most important thing: the fighting scenes are absolutely nuts! I mean damn great! If you saw all of the Bruce Lee-films, and Jet Li's entire filmography, you still didn't see anything like this before. There are sword fights, fights with bare hands and elbows and there are kicks, punches, cuts, THIS MOVIE HAS EVERYTHING! The final fight scene is just EPIC, you will cheer and scream, and you want to see it again. You will have a geekgasm, my friend!
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Anyone going in expecting action at the same level of ONG BAK or TOM YUM GOONG (aka THE PROTECTOR) will be somewhat disappointed. This is a whole different kind of movie really. Rarely does Tony Jaa show off the flips that made him famous. The first hour has a few fights here and there, but for the most part they are short but very brutal. Tony does do lots of different styles in here and my favorite part from this first hour is when he tests himself against three different guys (a swordsman, a kung fu man and a muay thai brawler).

    The last 20 minutes is where a majority of the action is and it is pretty insane. Jaa takes on about 30 ninjas and whoops some major ass here. The scenes are very, very bloody as well. And, of course, they have to have the scene where an elephant saves the day. Dan Chupong's role is very small, but a great part. He is dressed like a crow and kaws just like one. He has a very impressive stunt where he flips onto Tony (who is laid out on the elephant's tusks) and hits him right in the chest with his knees.

    All that said, I think it is a very well made film. It has incredible production values and the level of detail is fantastic. Jaa is 20 times more talented as a director than Prachya Pinkaew. He knows how to build the mood and shoots everything in an almost sinister light. As a film, it is much more accomplished than ONG BAK and TOM YUM GOONG. But I know people will definitely be disappointed in the amount of action, especially after a 3 year wait. Oh, also, it does end with a cliffhanger that sets up a third film. I hope we don't have to wait another 3 years!
  • poe42615 February 2010
    Warning: Spoilers
    A fascinating juxtaposition of martial arts movie and prehistoric epic, ONG BAK 2 is, to put it simply, stunning. The superb cinematography of sets that look to have been left standing from some long-lost civilization is just for starters. From the costumes (which are rich in detail and lend yet further visual depth to an already beautiful film) to performances that ring true throughout to some of the high-flying, death-defying martial arts for which Jaa is known, ONG BAK 2 is the kind of movie- satisfying on every level- that lovers of the genre always hope for but seldom get. If anyone could handle a big screen version of Robert E. Howard's CONAN (and do it the justice it deserves), it's director Tony Jaa.
  • As much as I enjoyed the original "Ong Bak" (2003), there were moments that felt like it was attempting to mimic big-budget action movies from other parts of the world (e.g., the motorbike chase, which was kinda lame). The script was also a bit bland in places. Still a great action flick, but it left some room for improvement.

    Enter "Ong Bak 2", which improves upon its predecessor in every conceivable way. The most obvious enhancements are the cinematography and set designs, which are phenomenal. The highlight sequence in this regard must be the night time dance, which emphasizes golden architecture and beautiful clothing that reminds one of the striking visuals that are showcased in Zhang Yimou's films. All is not so clean, however, because the environments add a significant amount of authenticity with an unending assault of gritty, dirty, primal village imagery amidst the forests of Thailand. One simply cannot overstate the spectacular images presented herein, and many reviewers seem to have undervalued the amazing cultural contributions that "Ong Bak 2" has to offer, because non-Thai viewers will be transported to an unfamiliar world that not only exhibits rough geographical locations, but an equally rough (and incredibly diverse) band of bizarre, threatening characters that are attention-grabbing for virtually every second they're on screen (e.g., the white-haired mystic, the pirates, the dark-skinned wrestler, the crow man, etc.). When all is said and done, this film genuinely captures Thai culture from start to finish, with no pandering to foreign influence outside of some martial arts styles.

    And that, my dear friends, is the crux of why "Ong Bak 2" so very easily surpasses its predecessor. Many of the non-action scenes are riveting and interesting to watch, which is something one cannot say about "Ong Bak" or even the brilliant "Tom Yum Goong" for that matter (which successfully used an absurd quantity of superbly executed action sequences to overpower any and all deficiencies that nest in-between the beatings). This is not to say that the script of "Ong Bak 2" is far better than Jaa's previous movies, because the conclusion is in desperate need for a direct sequel that wraps up the fates of the surviving antagonists as well as the lead protagonist. Nevertheless, the visuals, character interactions, and primary conflicts provide constant entertainment on a minute by minute basis. This movie doesn't even need action to sustain interest, and if that's not a glaring sign that Tony Jaa has already surpassed Bruce Lee as a cinematic entertainer, then nothing is.

    It is somewhat surprising to read some of the negative reviews that bash the storyline to bits without resorting to any specific observations whatsoever. It might be useful to provide some details as to why you think the story is so atrociously bad, because I can't see all that much to complain about other than the imperfect ending. While true that "Ong Bak 2" is more concerned with portraying character interaction than a traditional storyline, the events depicted are coherent. Either way, there are a ton of memorable scenes. Take the opening segments in the alligator pit, where the pirate throws the young protagonist a knife to see if he can survive on his own (instead of the pirate simply saving him). It's a great scene that adequately establishes a mutual respect between the characters as well as the raw potential of the lead protagonist.

    I can't believe I've written this much without delving into the martial arts choreography, which is excellent. Is it as good as "Tom Yum Goong" in terms of quantity and precise movements? Probably not - but then again, "Tom Yum Goong" is virtually impossible to top in that regard. However, "Ong Bak 2" does provide an impressive assortment of styles that are seamlessly integrated into the action. Jaa's character doesn't randomly switch between attack styles like some other reviewers have erroneously asserted. On the contrary, his transition from one fighting technique to the next is triggered by the availability of particular weapons as well as the attack strategies of his opponents. For example, if you ever find yourself near a three-sectioned staff while fighting a number of enemies, it might make sense to use it to your advantage.

    It's really nice to see that Jaa so capably expands into new realms and implements modifications to his strengths as a physical performer to yield refreshing, non-repetitive movies that are easily distinguishable from one another. I'll take this guy's movies over a lot of the big budget garbage currently coming out of China (those historical epics are just awful), and I hope that he continues to make Thai films exclusively in the near future. Although I do admit that a project with a capable Hong Kong co-star like Wu Jing or Donnie Yen would definitely get my blood pumping.
  • This followup to the hit Ong Bak has nothing to do with the original Ong Bak, and it seems like the producers were simply trying to cash in on the name, but boy- why did they have to? This movie stands upto itself on its own. Tight editing, lots of superb fight sequences, lots of innovative battle techniques, minimal storyline meaning minimal time wasted on anything but the raw action that we are there to see; all makes it a great movie impossible to miss. You get glued to your seat and wont even blink. Somebody wrote he was bored, which I tried hard to understand- but couldn't. Man, action movies don't get bigger or better than this. Its like Gladiator meets Apocalypto meets Rambo, only better. Raw gut wrenching intensity makes it a pleasure to watch. Don't miss this.
  • The movie is wonderful, to the point and did not mess-up up with too much story and dialogs.

    The movie shows tony ja's wish to cover the major martial art skills such as Chinese kung fu, Japanese Samurai, Ninja, Muay Thai, Drunken kungfu etc.,

    The fight sequences are brilliant, rough and the art of Drunken fighting is shown perfectly as you will see the real essence unlike that of older movies which have portrayed it as a funny martial art. tony ja's love for elephants is obvious(Thailand's national animal).

    overall 9/10 (-1 if there is no sequel) one can obviously see that even though the movie is tony ja's first direction it is very maturely taken and it's sure that it makes you feel like there should be some more at the end but The movie is unfinished as tony and the producers had some unknown clashes behind the scenes.

    Yet the movie is full of brilliant fights and you will surely be satisfied while expecting for a sequel.
  • swampfoxx-16 December 2008
    With a storyline reminiscent of Japanese video games and Samurai classics, it is nice to see this genre back on the big screens. The action sequences muscle out the storyline a bit, but they remain quite spectacular to watch. Tony Jaa clearly left a piece of his soul on the celluloid for the next generation to remember him by. The scenes are beautifully framed, full of color and contrast. All I felt that was missing was a control pad between my fingers and the freedom to take the character around the village to search for hidden treasure.

    If the movie leaves you scratching your head a little at the end, you are not alone. However I suspect that it implies that a sequel is in the works and I am in favor for that. It is great seeing the epic martial art films back on the big screen, with a devoted cast ensuring the audience that they will get their money's worth. It is the best film in this genre that I have seen in a good long while.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    The best thing that can be said about "Ong-Bak 2: The Beginning" is that it never repeats itself, even though it has plenty of chances to, with plenty of bone-crunching and dazzling repeated jump-kicks to the head. This film marks the directorial debut of the recent Thai sensation Tony Jaa (sharing a co-directing credit with his mentor Panna Rittikrai), who made his big splash on the international martial arts circuit in 2005 with the breakout success of "Ong-Bak: The Thai Warrior" (2003).

    But don't let this film's title fool you. "Ong-Bak 2: The Beginning" has nothing to do with "Ong-Bak: The Thai Warrior" except the fact that the two films share part of the same name. Instead, "Beginning" is a "prequel" of sorts to its predecessor, and its somewhat ambiguous ending will provide some hint of continuity between the two films. Other than that, the two films have nothing to do with each other.

    The big story here, of course, is Tony Jaa. The man can do incredible things with his body, incredible things that hurt me just thinking about them. True to all of his previous efforts, there's no wire-work or computer-generated imagery to aid in the impossible bone-crunching stunts. It's all old-fashioned guys jumping around and hurting each other like they do this stuff for a living (which they do).

    Unlike his previous efforts, however, "Ong-Bak 2: The Beginning" has a story, however disjointed and surreal it is (with a little bit of Asian mysticism thrown in for good measure), but it is a story. Set in feudal Thailand (all the previous films had contemporary settings), Tien (Jaa) was a young child when he saw his parents murdered by a traitorous warlord and his personal army of soldiers and hired killers. Sold into slavery but saved by a clan of pirates/guerrilla fighters, he is then trained in the ways of many different forms of martial arts and weapon styles from all over Asia. Later as a young man, he sets out on his own personal quest of vengeance against the corrupt warlord that orphaned him.

    Really, "Ong-Bak 2: The Beginning" is not a bad film at all, just an uneven one. I'm mainly referring to the film's story, which often switches between the past and the present and can become somewhat confusing. (But this is a martial arts movie, so a good story can be viewed by some as being inconsequential to the fights.) The film has many phenomenal action set-pieces that really make expert use of Jaa's penchant for crushing/breaking bones, acrobatic stunt-work, and mastery of many different fighting styles. It's all brutal stuff, but there's something extremely graceful and beautiful about it; it's almost like watching a martial arts ballet, if there ever was such a thing. The film also makes excellent use of its ancient Thailand setting; in a nutshell, this is Jaa's best-looking film yet. It really takes you to an ancient place and it's really beautiful the way the imagery sticks in your mind. And with the cinematography, costumes and production design, it is probably one of the best-looking martial arts movies ever made.

    "Ong-Bak 2" is a good, entertaining martial arts action flick, nothing more. The movie will have you cringing in your seat at some of things you see (and hear). But it's all good fun and games.

    8/10
  • Mesmerizing. I just finished watching Ong Bak 2 and I have only one thing to say - if you liked Ong Bak (or at least thought it was decent enough for your time), well, you're going to LOVE this one.

    Totally different story told in a beautiful way (no unanswered questions this time) filled with some of the greatest fights I've ever seen (and I'm a profound martial arts fan). Perfect balance between storytelling and action. A visual feast with decent music. Plenty of heart-touching moments that only add up to the story. Tony Jaa has done a great job both with the fights and with the acting (everyone in the movie is incredibly natural-must remind you that this is half a way from Hollywood, yet they manage to be a match).

    Don't hesitate to rent/buy this title cause it's definitely a must have (or a must see, at least). Oh and, this is my number one martial arts movie, sharing its place with Fearless.
  • Tony Jaa is back in his first directorial effort (co-directing to be more specific) and the man delivers everything you would expect from a solid martial arts flick, and then some more.

    The spiritual sequel to Ong Bak is quite an ambitious film, showing a wide diversity of fighting styles, using ancient thai history as the background. Jaa has certainly done his homework, because the movie has a strong old school HK vibe, but with a crude and gritty look. The plot is pretty much your standard martial arts/shaw bros 101 premise: hero takes revenge of his fallen comrades/family and so on, he begins as a weak victim to transform into a kick-ass machine. Nothing that any respectable MA movie aficionado haven't seen before, but the movie does it right and believable enough to engage the viewer. Not a complex story, but the motivations of the characters are convincing enough to move things on.

    The fight sequences are effective, never repetitive and quite intense. I mean, if you can't enjoy a movie that has everything from crocodile fights to ninjas, samurais, elephants, people fighting like crows and leopards, a guy that throws daggers and another guy that uses explosives then you might want to report back to mother ship, because the goods of this planet are just too much for you. The abrupt ending, while anti-climatic, doesn't kill the mood of the film.

    Far better from what anyone could expect, no idea why this go trashed by some people. Is no classic but it's a perfectly decent time waster. Which is more from what it can be say about other movies stuffing multiplexes these days.
  • Normally I would open with a plot summary when I write a review – not always but a lot of the time. With Ong Bak 2 I'm not sure I can be bothered or even that I should be because the plot here is so thin and so uninvolving that it is hardly worth the text. Essentially a child is rescued by pirates and grows up to be a great fighter, robbing and killing as they do. However when memories are triggered of his past he sets out for revenge , bringing secrets out into the open. In fairness, in those last two sentences I have made it sound more interesting than it actually is because I have suggested there is a flow to the narrative whereas in actuality the film is two of three "stages" that just suddenly move between one and the other. It is remarkably basic and, in terms of plot, remarkably poor. It isn't helped either by the fact that the entire film has a very serious dark tone to it – making it almost a weighty revenge tragedy. Now, I have no problem with that in theory but the problem here is that it doesn't do anything to justify that tone, nor does it do much to make it fit.

    It really needed the characters to be engaging and real for the audience to care but there are no characters to talk about. Amazingly even the main character of Tiang is poorly developed. A massive part of this is the small amount of dialogue in the film – indeed by the time you have read to the bottom of this review you will have read more words than are spoken in this film. Of course silent films could still make a plot a character so it is not the end of the world but it does hurt the film because with a weak plot and weak characters the lack of dialogue is even more telling. Fortunately the one saving grace of the film fills the vast majority of the running time – the action. Aside from the "sombre" moments between scenes there are plenty of great action sequences involving weapons of all types. They are impressive and quite exciting at times and the only rider I would put on that is that they are not as much "fun" as the action has been in some of Jaa's other films. That said, it is worth seeing the film for the action alone – which, when you think about it, is just as well.

    In terms of Jaa himself one really has to wonder what he is doing with his career because if films are to be his thing moving forward, then why does he appear to be going backwards in all of the aspects this involves excepting the action? In his previous films I have noted he is not very comfortable with lines and that any comic moment escapes him. Here it feels like those working with him have just given up totally and have allowed him to do little other than fight – he barely has a line in the film and any "plot/character development" stuff is done by the child playing his character while Jaa himself looks into a fire in a "remembering" pose. It is weird but it is part of the reason the film doesn't engage as much as I had hoped – because the main character is little other than a stunt man, albeit a very good stunt man. I'm sure fans will hate me for that and not see my point but the thing is, if he is going to continue making films in Thailand (far less films that can perform abroad) then he needs more than the impressive martial arts skills he has. He needs good vehicles, he needs to work on his many weaknesses as an actor and he needs to have a supporting cast that can fill the gaps that he cannot (such as in Ong Bak). At the moment Ong Bak 2 just looks like they are happy to film him fighting and leave it at that, which I think is a real shame because this only makes for great action – not a great film. Although he did a good job directing the film in some regards, this is probably a mistake because he cannot do anything about his own failings as a performer.

    Ong Bak 2 is a technically brilliant martial arts film with plenty for the weapons fan to love. However as a film it is really quite poor thanks to a thin plot, little dialogue and even less in the way of characters. The action makes it worth seeing but even fans will be hoping for a bit of a better product built around this. I continue to pay out to import Jaa's films because he is great at what he does but I hope that he can improve in other areas to make better total films rather than this type of thing again.
  • Ong Bak 2: The Beginning is not a continuation of the first film, neither is it a prequel in the true sense; the story takes place several hundred years ago, and tells of Tien (played as an adult by Tony Jaa), the son of a murdered lord, who becomes a powerful warrior after a clan of outlaws adopt him and teach him their combat skills.

    This period setting allows for a far more epic feel than the first film, but the broader scope of the plot ultimately means less minutes devoted to pure, bone crunching action, a fact that has understandably disappointed those hoping for another relentless, adrenaline fuelled, juggernaut of a martial arts movie. Add the fact that Jaa's impressive Muay Thai skills are often overlooked in favour of weapons based action, and it's not surprising that this film hasn't been as overwhelmingly well received as its predecessor.

    On a more positive note, the film looks absolutely fantastic, with beautiful cinematography, sumptuous costumes, and some truly outlandish characters, and when the action does kick into top gear, it is utterly breath-taking, especially during the flawlessly executed, bone-crunching final battle between Tien and a host of enemy warriors, where we finally get to see the star delivering his trademark punishing blows with knee and elbow.

    In short, Ong Bak 2 is a very enjoyable slice of solid action entertainment—not quite as jaw-dropping as part one, but then what is?

    7.5 out of 10, rounded up to 8 for IMDb.
  • Ever since the first Ong Bak film showcasing Tony Jaa's amazing Muay Thai skills, I became an instant fan. However that film's story wasn't as impressive as his martial arts, and I found it to be cliched and cheesy in the writing and dialogue departments, and had only rated it a generous 7/10, all going to Jaa's impressive stunt and fight choreography. However, the film critics seemed to enjoy that one better than I did, giving it an average of 85% on RT. So going into this one that is rated a much lower 49% on RT, I wasn't expecting much.

    Well was I ever pleasantly surprised with Ong Bak 2. Firstly, it has no relevance to the first film - which was good for me since I didn't really like that film's generic story. This was more of a historical 15th century story, which had a surprisingly more engaging narrative and sub plots, and a shocking well-done twist. I wasn't a fan of the constant flashbacks that were all over the place and convoluted the story, and I would've enjoyed it more if it was shown in a linear timeline. I can excuse that somewhat as rookie filmmaking mistakes, especially since this was Jaa's (co)writing and (co)directorial debuts.

    But whatever writing and directing flaws this film had were overshadowed by the most insanely impressive fight and action choreography I have ever seen. Clearly Jaa has many more martial arts skills than Muay Thai, as he displayed everything from Kung Fu to Tae-Kwan-Do, and used almost every martial arts weapon ever made. I mean the action choreography was astonishing, relentless and breathtaking. We kept rewinding certain action scenes amidst picking up our jaws from the floor, they were that good, and the reason this is a near perfect 9/10 from me. Come for a better story, stay for the incredible action - a must see film for any martial arts fan. Next, I will watch and review OB3.
  • As a martial artist and a movie goer I must say this film is a martial arts EPIC! There is not a cheesy aspect in this movie (martial arts movie).

    Tony Jaa proves to be a great artist. He is not only the most accomplished martial artist, that graced the screen, since Bruce Lee, but a very good director as well.

    What can I say about this movie? Choreography? Martial Arts Styles? Realism? Skills and acrobatics? Camera angles that allow you to actually observe the moves? Good story line? It has it all!

    I cannot describe it! It certainly is not a family movie, but one of the best action movies ever produced and certainly, and this is just my humble opinion, the greatest martial arts movie ever.

    Amazing, simply amazing!
  • druid333-213 November 2009
    Despite the fact that this film is being regarded as a sequel to the highly successful 'Ong Bak:The Thai Warrior',it is more of a companion film to the earlier one. That aside,'Ong Bak 2:The Beginning' is a high octane Martial Arts epic,starring Tony Jaa (the South East Asia answer to Bruce Lee...and perhaps a splash of Jet Li,for good measure). The story takes place in Siam,circa 1432. A young boy,who we find out is named Tien is taken prisoner by a band of vicious pirates,only to be rescued by a band of mercenaries. The boy is taken by the head mercenary to a blind master,where he will learn various realms of fighting technique. Eventually,Tien becomes the new master of the mercenary clan. The road ahead will be filled with trials & tribulations (not to mention some lightning fast battle scenes). This fast paced action/adventure thriller is co-directed by Tony Jaa & Panna Rittikrai,with a screenplay & story by Rittikrai. Besides Tony Jaa,the film is cast with some of Thailand's finest actors (and anybody who knows Thai cinema will certainly spot their favourites). I really admired the wide screen cinematography that at times is filled with some lightning fast Martial Arts action (at times it looked like a homage to the Shaw Brothers,who produced a bus load of Martial Arts classics back in the 1970's). Spoken in Thai with English subtitles. Rated 'R' by the MPAA for pervasive Martial Arts violence,some of which is fairly graphic & bloody,and a bit of rude language.
  • Since Bruce Lee, Tony Jaa proves to be a great artist. He is not only the most accomplished martial artist, that graced ,the beautiful MA's concepts. But a very good indeed coordinations &director's as his first on director's chair and the way he's going on.

    Q.:About his Choreography?. movie?. Choreography?. MA Styles?. Camera angles or the moves?. the plot?. A:Amazing, truly amazing!

    Someone said he should improve his acting skill? or his English?.For me,it's enough for him because the whole actions of martial artist is as an international language. There's no doubt how's he continue to be action icon by far,since the movie's world need to look at the real deal like him as he's a man to be deserved it!!.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Well, what a let down.

    A very unoriginal storyline-young kid has parents killed by nasty bad guy, leaving him orphaned, and is taken in as a child by some bearded dude who teaches him how to fight...boy becomes man and avenges parents death....but the twist is dun dun dun...the man who took him in and taught him martial arts is the masked warrior who sliced his dads throat all those years ago.....

    Ong Bak 1 was fantastic, I loved it, my friends loved it. I remember we all went down to the park after it finished trying to copy Tony Jaas moves and obviously failing, busting our groin areas trying to do those long stretch kicks and just looking like idiots. WE all walked home in pain and were disappointed we couldn't do the high knee kicks....

    As for Ong Bak 2, which is a 'prequel', its just rubbish. It lacked the flow and pacing of Ong Bak 1. THere was no humour which in my opinion made Ong Bak 1 even better.

    I was sorely disappointing with Ong Bak 2...the ending is just stupid.

    See it for yourself but don't expect much. What a disappointment.
  • My prejudice is that I find martial arts films to be crashing bore. It is an interesting form of dance, I suppose but I tend to just fast forward to the point where the real action begins again.

    Having said that I find Ong Bak 2 worth watching because it is one of the most arrestingly beautiful films I have seen in a long time. It is filled to the brim with more color that you will even get from Pedro Almodovar, which is a very great deal indeed. This is the sort of thing you bought the color TV for but rarely get to enjoy. Is it over done? Most certainly it is and that's just fine. This is one of those cases where too much is just right. Yes, I know, some of the effects are simple and basic, but they are used in every case as they were intended to enhance what is on the screen.

    If you want computer generated special effects look elsewhere, although there is a remarkable sequence in which some stone elephants come briefly to life, but that's about it.

    As you might expect, I highly recommend this film for your viewing pleasure. Note the word pleasure. Yes, it's a pleasure to see. It is, as they say, real easy on the eyes.
  • rnanakul14 December 2008
    Warning: Spoilers
    I'll be blunt, this movie left me upset an unfulfilled. The action sequences were amazing, and showed off all of Tony Jaa's phenomenal skills in both weapons, and acrobatics. However, over directing, bad pacing, a meandering story, and over production destroyed this movie. I realize that this is Tony Jaa's first directing job and he had a lot of pressure to turn out a good product but that doesn't mean that basic directing should be thrown out. Every scene in the movie was too dramatic and too over the top. What made Ong Bak 1 so great was its simple story line and directing. The predecessor felt more raw and real. Ong Bak 2 has neither elements and what you get is a jumbled mess that overloads your senses to the point of boredom. Half way through the movie I got tired of seeing water droplets and different zoom levels. It hurt to watch after a while because the directing took away from enjoying the fight sequences.

    Bad writing and pacing are hallmarks of Thai movies, and this was no different. Ong Bak 1 had a very simple story line of a man just trying to get back a relic. In the process he makes friends who change and develop with him. In the end, there's a triumphant ending and we all go home happy. In this movie, the story is so unorganized you don't know what's going on. Long scenes are spent to develop characters, but nothing is ever resolved. They spent 10-15 minutes developing the female lead, only to conclude it with some eye contact and him running off. Nothing is resolved and plot holes are a plenty. The ending *spoiler alert* is him just dying. After 90 minutes of fighting, he just dies, and we are taught a lesson about how not to let revenge consume us. That's it. The ending scene is a 20 spectacle on par with Tony Jaa's spiral stair sequence scene from "The Protector". However this just randomly ends with him getting killed. The story and ending left me upset, and unfulfilled. Tony Jaa again tried to do too much and ended up with too little.

    The production in this movie is epic. There are costumes, settings, and sequences that are a feast for the eyes. They also cost a lot of money and were completely unneeded. I know that Tony Jaa wanted to show off the splendor of Thai culture but a lot of the extravagant scenes did not add to the story and were a waste. The production in this movie easily explains on why this movie ran out of money so many times. Did they really need fake fire and CGI for a grand palace? No, they didn't they needed a coherent story line. Simply put, they should have spent money on other things besides sets and costumes, maybe something like a complete movie.

    Many of us watch these movies for the martial arts and action sequences. So how good were they? It was honestly a mixed bag. His over directing really takes away from this experience. The directing didn't allow me to enjoy his acrobatic leaps and kicks, which is the fun of action movies. Tony Jaa's vision was to create a movie that combines martial arts from around the world to create an ultimate fighter. The way they present the scenes make all the different styles distinct. Tiang explicitly switches from one style to another, and every time he does, the directing makes it apparent. As a result, the action feels very forced. Tony Jaa, although very good at his new styles, he seems very uncomfortable when using different styles that are not Muay Thai. The best action sequences, and the times he feels the most comfortable, are when he is using Muay Thai. As a martial artist who has studied martial arts from around the world also, I combine these different arts into my own style. As a result, what I do feels natural to me and looks natural in the way I fight. In separating all the fighting styles, it took away from showing off Tony Jaa's true skill, made the movie feel a little forced. They are all still amazing sequences and he a great martial artist but it could have been better with a different approach.

    All in all Ong Bak 2 was a disappointment for me. The bad story and horrible pacing (sequences of stories and action were not connected most of the time, leaving you just annoyed) really did this movie in for me. Furthermore, over directing and over production made things worse by creating an over budget, uncompleted movie. The action sequences although entertaining, lacked the tension and drive of his previous movies. They felt like scenes that were there just to keep the movie going and the character had no really purpose in doing them. I can only hope that Tony Jaa's next endeavor goes back to basics and makes something good again. If you read down below, it's a summary of the rest of the movie that was cut. You'll see scenes from the trailer that didn't make it in the movie, namely him in the white outfit. Read it if you want to understand what Tony Jaa's entire vision was. This could have been a better movie if it had been entirely shot but, not that much better. Either way this movie is going to make a lot of money and a lot of people will see it. He'll still be rich and famous so I really can't feel all that bad for the.
  • Set in 15th Century Thailand, the subtitled "Ong Bak: 2" brings little that is new to the martial-arts genre - but a barrel load of impressive fight scenes and an authentic look make it worthwhile viewing for the aficionado. It's the oldie about a young boy who is trained to become a righteous warrior, standing up for the innocent and the helpless against a cruelly oppressive regime.

    As noted, there isn't much in the way of storytelling, dialogue and characterization to distinguish "Ong Bak: 2" from the countless other films in this category, but the battle scenes are impressively staged and mounted, with a brutality that, while it makes them hard to watch at times, seems an accurate reflection of the era in which it's set. Moreover, directors Panna Rittikrai and Tony Jaa (who plays the lead role) never feel the need to prettify the setting, offering up a screen full of snaggle-toothed, matted-locked extras to go along with all the muck and mud.

    Tien, ace martial arts fighter and tamer of elephants, takes on a half-a-dozen opponents at a time, slicing-and-dicing and karate-chopping them into the dust, only to have them rise again to face a second, third, even fourth humiliating go-round at his punishing hands. It's 100% absurd and just about everything a die-hard martial arts fan could wish for from such a film.
  • I love martial arts films. I am particularly fond of the old Jackie Chan and Jet Li films amongst others. I guess you could say I am fan of hard hitting martial arts where the actors really put their abilities and bodies to the test. Honestly I am not so much a fan of the Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon sorts, too much wire work and it doesn't feel real or organic to me.

    Tony Jaa is the new kung fu master of cinema. He also happens to be a mighty fine director although I know he had help. This film is brilliantly filmed and has everything you could want from a Martial Arts film minus the wimpy wired stunts. OK there might of been wires used a couple of times at the end, but not much. The point is if you like hard hitting martial arts epics with great stories then this is a must see. The story is pretty good compared to most films in this genre, and the fight scenes are breath taking. I found this on Xbox live for like 1200 points, (which is pretty expensive for a movie) and was wondering if I made a mistake paying so much. I am getting to see it before it hits theaters so I understand the steep price. After watching I feel is was well worth the 1200 points. This is definitely one of the greatest martial arts actions flicks I have scene.It even throws in a little drunken master style in one scene which is one of my favorites. :)
  • Ong Bak 2: The Beginning is an exercise in noise & color which leaves the viewer scratching his head & at times his brain. What did I watch? Even the most thematically starved martial arts films will have a fight or two to recommend it but wow, what a paucity of ideas we have here. Although boasting a moving dance number, no amount of story manipulation can invigorate this tired tale of revenge & retribution.
An error has occured. Please try again.