Add a Review

  • w-4295913 April 2017
    They don't make 'em like this anymore. No, really. They don't.

    This show isn't out-right hilarious like Seinfeld or It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia, but it's consistently funny. The jokes are continuous, the laughs per minute ratio is high and there's nothing but comedy.

    It is not some cheap, soapy drama punctuated by one-liners (How I Met Your Mother), but lots of light-hearted comedy.

    It's shallow by design, light-hearted and light-spirited. There's none of that cynicism of some comedies (you know which ones), no "awwww coupley crap from rom-coms, no deeper drama, nothing of that sort. The comedy is based on making you laugh, not awkward and discomforted.

    I'm sad there isn't more of this show.
  • i only started watching this recently and now i'm hooked. i watched one episode just to say i had and ended up watching about 10episodes in a row. this a lot smarter than i thought, the one-liners are excellent, the characters have depth, and the story is pretty good as well. spade is good as the weaselly playboy, Hudson is good as the idiot, the women are good at being the kinda normal average women in relationships, but Patrick Warburton is the star. his timing is perfect, his delivery is excellent and he comes across a genuinely like-able guy. a guy that most guys could relate to. all in all i think there is something or someone in the show that most people can relate to and enjoy.

    watch a few episodes, you be hooked!
  • Ernst-26 February 2007
    Generally speaking, the plot was much better than I was expecting. The laugh track was a bit annoying at times and did tend to get in the way; however, there were enough real chuckles in this episode to make up for it. My biggest surprise was finding some of the best lines and situations were not shown in the trailers. Spade, in particular, was not presented in the best light in the earlier promotions, but his character comes across quite well in the pilot. There is is enough eye-candy to please almost anyone and all the regular characters seem up to the task ahead of them. Now, if the writers can just live up to what they have begun.
  • Phoenix_e1321 August 2011
    I love this show! Patrick Warburton is hilarious! All the characters of the series are great however i'm not a huge fan of the little dwarf 'Russel'. His acting looks really forced and sometimes it's over the top.

    The best part of the show is probably all the different characters who happen to be friends. This usually leads to funny moments during the show. I think people who are watching this show can relate to some of the characters. Me for example, can relate to Jeff! "Woman let me watch the game, and if your going that way could u get me a drink?". My girlfriend can relate to Audrey who would probably tell them to get it them self and would be whining about going to visit friends, parents, shopping.. or whatever.

    Patrick Warburton is a great actor and very underrated! Some reviewer said that he couldn't deliver a joke. That's complete BS! The way 'Jeff' delivers a joke is great! He is sarcastic and with his deep voice it's a killer combination. I think he is the funniest guy in the show by far! If your looking for a hilarious series, you've found it!
  • I missed almost all of the first season, but when the other shows went to reruns, I started watching. I ended up buying the entire first season off iTunes. This is now one of my favorite comedy shows. Patrick Warburton is the key. His dry sense of humor has me rolling all the time. David Spade is funny, but sometimes a little Russell goes a long way. I enjoy the other cast members more (but not saying he doesn't add to the show).

    Do yourself a favor. If you haven't checked this one out, give it a try. If you can catch the episode where "Jeff" goes to the sperm bank, you will see how good this show is.

    I hope this series has a long run.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    A married couple trying to have children, an engaged couple, and a confirmed bachelor try to all navigate between life as best friends, marriage, relationship, and work.

    With Seinfeld's Patrick Warburton, David Spade of SNL after years of playing straight man to the late Chris Farley, and Goldie Hawn's son Oliver as they had great chemistry on it.

    Show should had a better shelf life!
  • kellyenright5 February 2007
    This show will succeed because it appeals to all adults no matter where they are in their relationship. As a man married for 26 years, I empathize with Patrick Warburton's character: he loves his wife, but he assumes she knows that. I also enjoy his monotone delivery; never gets too excited or too low. A nice ensemble of characters. This will be a nice addition to the Monday night line-up.

    I don't know how David Spade will be in his role. He is best enjoyed in small doses. He also seems a little old to still be trolling for women.

    I enjoyed the pilot and I look forward to seeing how the series develops.
  • dcav8810 January 2013
    I hate most of the new laugh track sitcoms. The writing revolves around immature sexual innuendos. The sitcom died when Seinfeld, ELR, and the King of queens left television. While this show is not innocent of using unimaginative sex puns, it does have many likable characters. Patrick Warburton brings us back to the old days of David Puddy, and if you're a fan of David Spade's obnoxious sarcasm, you will definitely get your fill. Perhaps the biggest surprise; however, is the South African Indian actor Adhir Kalyan. His timing is impeccable, and as David Spades assistant, the dialogue between the two is hysterical. Ultimately, this show does not come close to the big three mentioned earlier, but it is by far the best out there today.
  • I will really miss this show when I reach the final episode. It is the perfect show that you can put on after a hard day at work and just laugh at. There are no dark depressing aspects to this show it just aims to entertain with laughter and it definitely succeeds in doing that. There is a basic underlying storyline that helps to propel the show but it is more about the characters living out their day-to-day lives.

    Jeff and Audrey are my favourite couple and live up to their stereotypes perfectly. The beer- guzzling, sports-watching neanderthal with a soft-side and his shopaholic, emotional, nagging wife. It may be over the top but it works. The rest of the core cast is also entertaining and each play their part in contributing to a stereotypical world where everyone is funny.

    Try not to over think this one, just enjoy it for what it is and you'll find yourself laughing in no time.
  • Light, funny and rewatchable for as many times as you have the opportunity! The cast is great, goes well together, even great! The topics are funny but not unrealistic, the setting and clothing just lovely for the eyes.

    It even managed to stay good after they introduced Timmy, which frankly is unpleasant as a character, because it is like watching someone torture a kitten. And the kitten is Timmy. The character just did not fight back enough, to compensate the abuse Russel submitted him to, and that part was cringe.

    Luckily the Russel - Timmy boss - PA duo was just one part of the show, which was equally held by the other duos.

    So "Rules.." made it to the hall of fame, as an underrates gem of a sitcom. In a cathegory of its own.

    Kudos to Wharburton, too. Should have played in more sitcoms than he did. Maybe he will add to those something new.
  • Unlike many sitcoms today, Rules of Engagement seems to have proved it's worth over and over again, - all the way from its pilot episode. The show gives off an unusually warm and genuine vibe which resonates from its opening theme.

    The show may be considered a bit 'linear' for some critics, who are more concerned about the solid creativity that a sitcom of our 'day and age' delivers through its plot and characters, than its actual aesthetic, artistic and meaningful worth, targeted at its audience.

    But even then the dialogue works great with its acting characters, and eliminates the fact that the show is placed in such an average environment, - this generally presented environment, along with the shows generally presented character roles, may provoke a critic to say the show is 'typical' or 'expected', as a sitcom, which includes a 'stereotypical cynical-married couple', and a 'naive engaged couple', and a 'womanizing single'. Even if these claims are true, the show lives passed its potential even in it's narrow field, (especially as a mid-season replacement).

    Other than these negatives which are usually evaluated by critics, the show is very refreshing as a TV show. Unlike many sitcoms today, there are scarce times when the viewer is expected to laugh at an obviously unfunny joke. Though there may be a laugh track, but it doesn't get in the way of the character roles and dialogue.

    I give the series a 10/10 because as a TV show, - it's very underrated and deserves at least as much views and feedback as it did when it came out. What I really like about the show is that it's so upfront as a sitcom, building up from ideas from golden shows that are done and dusted, and that it still seems to keep the care-free vibe that it had since the beginning episode, - the actors fulfill their roles and sometimes, succeed them.

    Overall, the show is great, the dialogue is original and actually funny, the characters are played well by their actors, & the show lives big in it's narrow field as a sitcom.
  • For me, this whole series belongs to Patrick Warburton. He makes me laugh so much through this entire show. I love the younger couple, both characters and actors, and David Spade is great until he gets his assistant. Adhir Kalyan is fabulous as Timmy. I do find Audrey annoying. The character is shallow, angry, insipid, never happy and always right. The actor playing her with that little giggle with every single line just drove me nuts. She is attractive, which is how Hollywood hires, but she has the range of a one-armed drummer. The Spade character was funny as the over-sexed sneeze bag, but he loses all redeeming qualities with his treatment of Timmy. I find it very frustrating as a viewer to see the 'Russel Dunbars' and the 'Sheldon Coopers' behave so abominably and never get their comeuppance. Worth a watch, just mute Audrey when she starts to whine.
  • I wasn't really excited when I saw the promos of this show.Something about it just seemed stale, predictable and unimaginative.

    Yet when I caught one of the episodes, I was pleasantly surprised.In spite of the predictable premise(couples who are friends with issues, a married one, a live-in one and a pervert), in spite of the predictable story lines in most episodes, in spite of the predictable character growth etc....there is something in this show that just leaves you utterly pleased and at most times laughing wholeheartedly.And i became a regular watcher.

    You will also care for most of the characters.Patrick Warburton who plays Jeff which honestly is the extension of his character David Puddy( + intelligence) from Seinfeld.Megyn Price's Audrey is utterly likable.David Spade's Russell is a convincing rich, spoiled pervert and Adhir Kalyan's Timmy which started as guest role becomes the perfect partner to Russell as his assistant. Bianca Kajlich & Oliver Hudson though are the weakest links and frankly don't add much apart from pretty looks.Partly the writers are to be blamed as they pretty much assassinated Oliver Hudson's character Adam in the later seasons by turning him into a male Bimbo.He wasn't that dumb in the earlier episodes.

    Overall this is one enjoyable show and every episode is hilarious.
  • Over the run of the show there have been many funny moments, mostly between Russell and Timmy.

    A few things bring this show down, the biggest being that Jeff and Audrey really don't like each other in about 99% of the episodes, really why are they married; this also rolls over to Adam and Jen who are engaged during the entire run.

    Another is the intelligence of Adam goes down with each season and he is presented as a idiot in most scenes.

    The opening line to the opening lyrics, "How many ways to say I love you", in 7 seasons the couples may have said it once or twice, I had a hard time believing they love each other.

    So. Some great little nuggets in the seven seasons of mostly negative representation of relationships.
  • I absolutely love this show! So depressed that they cancelled it. I actually only just started to watch it in approximately the last year or so, as a result I have quite a lot of reruns still to watch! Yippee! But of course like a lot of reruns they are played out of order, so it is interesting to see the difference in the older to more recent eps.

    The show started with 1 married couple, 1 engaged couple, and David Spade typecast as usual as the single and sleazy playboy. David Spade is probably why I didn't watch the show to start with, because I've never liked anything he was in- till now! This show is great, I love all the characters even David Spade's. I notice that some reviewers here like some of the actors but not others, I've certainly seen shows like that, but this isn't one of them, I think all the actors/actresses are equally talented and their characters are all brilliant. However if you watch the end seasons you won't like the engaged couple, but don't blame it on the actors it was the writers fault, they started the show off brilliantly, the guy (Adam) was a little bit metrosexual and a bit naive (which was a nice foil to his pal the married man who is a very cynical, conservative, male chauvinist type) but really Adam and Jen (his fiancée) were really great characters who were madly in love, however fast forward to the end seasons and the writers have morphed Adam into a complete twit, he's beyond metrosexual and almost camp (one late episode has him being a cheerleader who doesn't seem to understand why his fiancée is embarrassed about this), he doesn't get the point of sarcasm because he is so stupid, contrast this to an earlier season where Russell (David Spade) uses the word ironic to describe something stupid he has done and Adam as quick as a flash says "no your pronouncing it wrong, it's pronounced moronic!" So fairly obviously Adam's character at the beginning was capable of being witty, but the later episodes the writers have transformed him into a complete idiot, then the fact that they have made Adam such a twit leaves his fiancée Jen nowhere to go except to be forever rolling her eyes and basically phoning it in. Though the actor playing Adam still bravely gives it his best. I get the impression that the writers just didn't know what to do with Adam and Jen anymore.

    You might wonder then if it is worth watching the later seasons, well it is because during this time they introduced Timmy, Russell's new Indian assistant. Timmy absolutely steals the show in these later eps. Russell and Timmy are like the odd couple, in fact I think this amazing dynamic that they have and the brilliant story lines written for this "couple" is the reason for the engaged couples demise, because the show then really becomes mainly about Russell and Timmy and the married couple (who still have plenty to do but are a little overshadowed as well), and all of this leaves the engaged couple out on the sidelines. I'm not sure what I prefer because when I watch the older episodes I miss Timmy, but then again enjoy watching the dynamics of the engaged couple versus the married couple. So the later eps are a little different from the beginning but I enjoy all the eps pretty much equally (except I really feel sorry for the actors playing Adam and Jen in the later eps!)

    Another introduced character near the end is Liz (Russell's girlfriend) but thankfully she didn't last too long because I wasn't too keen on her character.

    Oh and I haven't mentioned the married couple much, but they are really the heart and soul of the show and have brilliant story lines, and the guy Jeff, famous as having previously been a well known bit character on Seinfeld, plays a similar hilarious macho type, with his long suffering mostly sensible wife Audrey. In real life this couple really should be divorced but that makes them perfect for comedy!

    Of course a lot of the comedy is clichéd as they are all the usual stereotypes of older cynical couple versus naive young lovers, but it is incredibly well written, and the reason stereotypes exist in comedy is because these are people we all have met! What is unique though I think is how they developed Timmy, still a bit of stereotyping but a little different from the direction you would expect and brilliant because of this, and the way the end ep resolves Russell and Timmy's relationship is jaw dropping in its comic unpredictability. So so sad this hilarious show has come to an end.

    I would give this show a 10 but must give it a 9, in sympathy to "Adam" who basically had his testicles removed by the writers.
  • This would have to be one of the funniest TV sitcoms to come out of the States since the demise of "Everybody Loves Raymond". Warburton is always hilarious, and in this complements the rest of the ensemble cast to perfection. David Spade continues to tickle my funny bone enormously with his quite unique delivery of his lines. After having raved over the British series, "Coupling" I can see from just where the creators of "Rules of Engagement" got their original idea, but this is not intended as being a "brickbat" - the absolutely brilliant dialogue and the way in which it is conveyed set this particular series completely apart. But it takes more than a competent cast to bring success to a new series, particularly in the very difficult field of comedy. Having been a part of a professional TV comedy writing team for the best part of 7 years in Australia, I can appreciate particularly, the role of director and the perceptional and creative talent of the camera crew. One of the few grievances I have with the series is the very obviously "canned" laughter. Surely a live audience could have been used in the shooting of the series.
  • ChRisXd018 June 2021
    Rules of Engagement it's a classic serie you can see if you're bored ! The serie has some funny episodes but there are episodes which are really boring... Not something special :(
  • Guys,Cant explain how good it is.Watched first5 season and i cant wait for more and more. Just watch and you will understand.David Spade and Patrick Warburton deserve special mention.I love the way the group pick on each other. love the chemistry between Patrick and Megan, Patrick and Oliver Hudson.Even Adhir kalyan had done a great job.Extremely funny and relaxing, if you really want to enjoy see from start season 1, not in between. Definitely I will rank the series at par with " How I met Your Mother" or ' Friends".Patrick Warburton done extremely well with Dry Humor, David Spade excellent with the crude ones. Watch it and have a blast. Although not very fond of Liz. Avash
  • Rules of Engagement stands out among the many sit-coms because it has a pleasant sense of humor that's simple and direct. The various characters with their features and their personalities mingle in with each other pretty nicely and the result is an amusing show to watch. The friends that meet every day at the diner, talking about their lives and their daily problems, reminds me a lot of "Seinfeld" and I think that the intention of the creator was to take that as a reference. My favorite character is Jeff, played by the hilarious Patrick Warburton, who always manages to have that serious expression and way of doing even in the most ridiculous situations.
  • Great show. Don't know why they kept canceling and giving them terrible time slots throughout. Warburton alone kills it, but so do the rest. Every episode from the pilot on is great. The guy's comparison to always sunny is bad cuz the writing and acting is by far so superior there is no comparison. You can watch season 1 or 6 and get how tight they had the production at the start and end
  • The sitcom started off solid, and had such promise but then went off the rails after a while.

    While the funniest was definitely Patrick Warburton, the other couple played by Oliver Hudson and Bianca Kajlich weren't as funny as he was but they were alright. After all, they could only work what was given to them & if what was given wasn't up to par, then there wasn't much they could do with it. Megyn Price, who played Audrey provided a very nice balance to Jeff's sarcastic humour and they made a rather believeable couple so kudos to that pairing.

    I highly disagree with some other reviews which stated the 'greatness' of David Spade, who was anything BUT funny. They also tried to make him sort of the 'Joey' of the group i.e. The single guy who was morally corrupt but was actually a lovable member of the tribe. He was nothing like that, and his jokes, innuendo's and overall behaviour grew increasingly worse, especially after the arrival of Timmy who was far funnier than he was. Now, whenever I watch the re runs, I switch the channel when he comes onto the screen as I am so disgusted by the sight of him.

    All in all, they could have been so much better had they not have the Russell (David Spade) character in the series. While some sitcoms balance their characters beautifully, this one didn't and really missed the mark. It's such a shame because the rest of them did try their best.
  • I came across this show by chance a couple years ago; long after it had been cancelled, but was immediately hooked! In many ways it reminded me of Married With Children, with I suppose Adam and Russell being the children for this show? While the humor can be a bit tedious at times, the chemistry the characters have brings a nostalgic comfort to a dying genre - the sitcom. After catching a few episodes in syndication, I sought out the show on DVD, but then quickly noticed that the entire series was on Netflix.

    Patrick's comedic delivery as Jeff was spot on. Adam's incessant obliviousness wasn't wholly present during the first season, and wore a bit thin as the show went on, but I found this style of humor to be somewhat charming compared to the other characters. Then there's of course David Spade's character Russell Dunbar. He didn't really have much of an arc throughout the series, and he definitely made me laugh more often than not, but he was really more of a caricature than anything. It wasn't until his foil, Timmy (Timir) came along that I began to appreciate their banter. Audrey and Jennifer are also excellent in their respective roles, and they are great standouts in this male-oriented show. (I short-changed them quite a bit, sorry)

    It's unfortunate the show only lasted five seasons. I felt I had at least a few years left; especially coming back after a year-long hiatus. There were a couple of significant breaks in continuity, Timmy's immigration status for example, but not a show-killer IMHO. I've now watched the show multiple times and continue to find things I hadn't noticed before that make me laugh.
  • Recently I stopped watching 'How I Met Your Mother' because of pervasive crude and sexual humor. Unfortunately it resulted in losing the happy medium between too funny and too dramatic. After a long search for a similar show with less inappropriate content I discovered 'Rules Of Engagement.' I was disappointed to find that the characters don't appear to have much depth, nor do they feel very real. The writing is not as good as it is in HIMYM, and the actors are over the top, especially Patrick Warburton. David Spade is one of my all time favorite comedians and he plays a character much like Barney Stinson, unfortunately he is not as good for the part as Neil Patrick Harris. The show is too far consumed with the comedy to take a moment for a moral of the story. It's funny, fairly clean, and semi-well written. It's a good show with decent comedians, and a good plot. Worth the watch.
  • I don't understand how this show managed to stay on the air for seven seasons.

    It's basically a show about two couples and one single guy who hang out because... I don't really know because they don't really seem to like each other that much. Individually, they seem like great actors but for some reason they just don't work well on screen together. Not to mention that the lines on the show are pretty much the guys saying cheesy phrases that remind me of the old: "guess who's got two thumbs and loves to watch TV... this guy" yeah, witty.

    I mean, one of its recurring jokes consists in two grown men calling a friend of theirs names like: 'zebra,' 'referee' and 'hamburglar' because she is wearing a striped black and white top. Brilliant.
  • Please get this absolutely rubbish show off English TV. The is nothing funny about it, the recorded laughter is cheap and tacky.

    A guy walks into a room, recorded laughter. Someone opens the door, recorded laughter. They say hello, recorded laughter.

    It's the tackiest form of "comedy" there is, it cannot even be considered slapstick humour, actually, it makes slapstick humour seem funny in comparison. The producers must assume the viewers are idiots that need reminding when to laugh.

    American "comedy" shows need to remove this from their programs, nearly every show made in America has this laughter now.
An error has occured. Please try again.