User Reviews (7)

Add a Review

  • Warning: Spoilers
    Borders between countries are a logical idea, but in reality they are absurd, as there really isn't any real borders, just some pieces of land people have decided to guard after looking some maps saying "This is where it goes." "Raja 1918" is a story of an officer Von Munck (Martin Bahne), who is sent after the civil war of Finaland to the Finland/Russia border to enforce the border line. After the idealistic man arrives, he notices, that the people live at the both sides of the border river, crossing the bridge as they will, not caring on which side of the imaginary line they are. And after the Bolsheviks are starting to seize the full control of Russia, a horde of refugees appears to the border. Von Munck has to tighten his grip, but it soon comes evident, that he isn't just separating two countries, he is driving a wedge between families as well.

    "Raja 1918" is well acted and mostly well directed film, with great settings and good atmosphere. Only major issue is, that the story is overly melodramatic, whit no happiness in sight. The subject matter is very heavy and there are moments, which try to soften the film, like the commander of Russian border line major Gentch (Leonid Mozgovoy), who offers some brief moments of comedy, as well more drama, to the story. But overall the doomed love story, the social issues and dividing of the nations is filled with a bit too much drama. Maybe the movie would have been a bit more enjoyable, if the love story plot would have been removed, as now it just adds more depression into already heavy film.

    But overall "Raja 1918" is well made film. I wouldn't mind of seeing more quality projects like this coming from Finland.
  • Joropukki29 March 2008
    Warning: Spoilers
    I was pleasantly surprised at the quality of this movie. Director Törhönen has grown up and "Raja" makes me look forward to his coming work.

    A regular pitfall in Finnish films is the dialogue. To the ear of the average Finn, actors either speak like books or spew curse words. Here the dialogue is sounds natural and moves effortlessly from one language to another and from the local dialects to high style. The companionship between the officers of Finland and Soviet Russia reminds one of Renoir's Great Illusion. Fine side characters add to the believability of the story. Here the director echoes the works of John Ford and Sergio Leone.

    Another war classic comes to mind, Schöndorff's Der Fangschuss. Even the epoch and the front line are the same - whites against reds in a small, recently independent country - in Schlöndorff's case Latvia.

    To add to the emotions, both films feature an ill-fated romance across the divide. In Raja 1918 this slightly strains the historical narrative and drops one point from perfect ten.

    Another minor (minus one pt) disappointment comes up with the ending. The narrative turns to shock effects and a prolonged goodbye-scene with a dead love breaks the general, almost-documentary like feel of the movie. There is a Peckinpah-style sequence of stills to underline the brutality of warfare - quite unnecessarily. The film could have ended with the taking of the group photograph.

    Still, a commendable effort, maybe the best Finnish war movie ever.
  • Annals of history are a long story of a sea of blood... It is difficult to argue. There is virtually not a single remote corner of Europe where nobody has ever spilled someone's blood. No surprise that today, there are so many relatively small countries on this small continent with fancifully indented coasts. And all these states were always at loggerheads with each other, time and again recarving the map, taking neighbours up, conquering them, decaying themselves as a result of civil dissension… Heaven knows how many world wars (Pan-European at least!) Europe, that cradle of nationalism, has suffered historically! But there were considered to be just 2 world wars: the most monstrous ones, both having wiped away from the face of the earth tens of millions of people and a few empires as well!

    When thinking about all this, one is willy-nilly likely to become filled with a holy terror; as one tries to imagine oneself were among those 'cogs in the machine' whom POWERS THAT BE dispatch with one dread glance to that dead waste which is called war. And war has almost nothing to do with anything humanistic; 'almost' – because some people do try by-passing the martial laws and helping neighbour, but are usually exposed and executed … And war is normally a survival-of-the-fittest (or, appreciably less likely, a survival-of-the-sliest) environment. It is unlikely that a feeble, meek one would survive the war…

    All these conspicuous facts have been shown in the said Russian-Finnish film. Such films are useful. They cynically break the rose-coloured specs people see through and wipe false smiles away from the faces of the of diplomats. Even such a tiny and seemingly odd land as Finland had to suffer world wars to suit its own ends and at least repeated its lesson of hatred according to the high (not the highest though) standards. Constrained between Scylla and Charybdis, i.e. Russia and Sweden, this nation has suffered centuries-old confused state, in terms of language as well: whether to speak own autochthonal Finnish tongue, or Russian, or Swedish. Partly, lingual situation is still in a turmoil in Finland, but how awful it was then, in 1918, when one might be even shot and killed for improper accent! The most frantic daredevils in the Finnish society would go to work and discriminate 'aliens' against; and even set a shining example to those hesitant about whether to destroy 'aliens' or not. He that is not with his nation is against it, said the daredevils to those who did not mind the existing priorities – thus making them to participate in giving short shrift to Russians (representatives of Finland's former 'parent state') and to their local Finnish sidekicks. Little Finland suffered its own Civil War simultaneously with Russia, and just like in Russia, it was fought between the "Whites" (anti-Soviet forces, which were backed by several Western powers) and the "Reds" (Communist forces), but the result was quite the opposite. The German-backed "Whites" beat the "Reds" all to ribands and the White Terror beat the Red one to nothing.

    I am quite confused to describe how much I was impressed by this film… It is fearful simply because it touches upon relatively little-known events which are difficult to be grasped with mind and which unsheathe just one conjecture. That is, no nation on earth boasts clean hands. Some always die so that others live. You would not wish living "in the wrong place at the wrong time" on your worst enemy.

    I was petrified of this film
  • This is a refreshing drama taking on issues "off the beaten track" of the main stream Finnish historical dramas.

    It is spring of 1918. The Finnish war of independence is over. The war had turned into a bloody civil war between whites and reds. A young scientist and officer, captain von Munck, is sent to close the border between the newly independent Finland and Russia under Bolshevik revolution. St. Petersbourg is close, only 40 km away and foreign, Russian and Finnish refugees, spies and revolutionaries try to cross the border to Finland.

    The young man must set up a clear border between Finland and Russia, white and red, enemy and friend, us and them. While the task seems clear he finds out the execution of his command in concrete situations is very difficult. Right choices turn out to be wrong ones and correcting them make things worse.

    This historical war movie is the border that most other war movies take for granted. There is a border, there is us and them. This is clear - also in this movie - but where is the border, where is the "thin red line" right here and now? In the story the border, us and them ,is moving from situation to another, from place to another.

    The movie has some technical flaw but the script and editing work well. As a description of the situation after 1918 civil war this is a rare filmatisation. I would recommend movie makers to look slightly of the beaten track when choosing historical war and drama topics.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    "Raja 1918" takes us to the world of war between Whites and Reds in Finland. After the declaration of independence Finland drifted to the situation that it was torn between Finnish and former Soviet Nation. Before the independence Finland was under the power of Russia. "Raja 1918" tells a story of a captain Karl Von Munck (Martin Bahne) who is sent to the eastern border to control the way where people want to cross the border to Finland. Von Munck falls in love with a teacher Maaria Lintu (Minna Haapkylä) who is engaged to a rebel fugitive, traitor Heikki Kiljunen (Tommi Korpela). The movement controlling is cruel. People are guaranteed, sent back to Russia or killed merciless.

    The cast is brilliant. Martin Bahne is a very needed addition to the Finnish actors. Bahne brings a delicate touch to the Finnish soldier scene and deliver a touching performance. Bahne also speaks Finnish, Swedish and German what is very impressive. Minna Haapkylä is again in a strong female lead. Tommi Korpela is great as tough Heikki Kiljunen. Hannu-Pekka Björkman, Risto Kaskilahti and Lauri Nurkse make also memorable roles.

    "Raja 1918" is a well-made, well-acted and surprising war-drama. The movie makes you appreciate our freedom and safety after all wars. The Civil War was very appalling and divided the people but it strengthen the unity of Finland and formed it how it is today. "Raja 19182 is realistic and interesting. The movie holds you till the end and still you yearn for more. "Raja 1918" is one of the best movies that Finland has produced ever. Freedom is a very topical subject because of wars and Civil Wars around the world.

    High recommends!
  • Warning: Spoilers
    To begin with, unless you know Finnish history well, this movie won't offer much. Some tasty details are there though.

    This is excellent film. Not in technical or even cultural or artistic sense but in how it relates to the time and philosophies we live in and what we take for granted. Borders. Who would think twice when hear that notion? I bet not many. Yet, there is similar "definition" process behind even that groundbreaking, concrete thing (considering heavy emphasis and use of time for virtual communities and worlds now) taken granted. Yes, that is not so complicated to grasp, yet in practice takes time and devotion, as depicted by main character Carl von Munck. Without this devotion these things may never happen considering famous WW I time french philosopher that actually exact definitions are far from human nature. The interesting part in the plot and character is therefore how this ideal and mission, combined, intertwine with the daily life of the character. There are indications to what happens when pressure rises (to achieve results in daily job, scene with beggar; relate to The Limitless(2011), of nowadays depictions in movies).

    *spoiler*

    Main plot is mainly simplistic as of depiction of events (romance with Mrs. Lintu), yet credible enough to support storyline. */spoiler*

    The interesting part, as partly expected (from anarchy), is in the end that what happens after great crisis like war. As expected, life continues, but in no way you'd expect or would approve (or justify). Yet it does.
  • This is no drama made up to contain enough of action, romance and intrigue to suit any common audience, but actually a story out of a very cruel reality, which was one of the bloodiest civil wars that ever occurred in Europe, the traumatic consequences of the Finnish liberation from Russia after the Russian revolution in 1917 when a large part of Finland fought for communism in Finland while the legal democratic government had to fight for its life not to become enslaved by Russia again under the yoke of brutal atrocious communism. The civil war that lasted the entire spring of 1918 cost 35,000 lives on both sides, and the post traumatic effects are still felt in Finland today. A young captain (Martin Bahne) is commissioned to establish a definite border between Finland and Russia and to guard it against communist infiltration. The chaos after the revolution in Russia however triggers a flood of emigrants from Russia who all want to save their lives from the mass executions and persecutions of former aristocrats and academicians by the bolsheviks, while Finland just can't accept them all. There has to be a severe sorting out of the rabble, Russians who don't know Finnish, which terrible work proves quite an ordeal for the young officer, who has to deal with many tragic fates. One of them is the local school teacher (Minna Haapkylä) who protects her wounded lover, who is a communist wanted by the Finnish authorities. Another is the doctor Yevgeni Perret, a Russian, who successfully treats the wanted communist under cover. But the most important and interesting part is the Russian commandant on the Russian side, Major Gentsh, (Leonid Mozgovoy) who is a former aristocrat who has been obliged to serve the communists and who develops a friendship with Bahne. They play chess together and enjoy some brandy, while they try to sort out the human problems of the Russian refugees. His position is very uncertain though, and he finally has to try to escape himself to the Finnish side. Here a formidable mess of traumas coincide. The final scenes are apocalyptic in their tremendous pathetic tragedies. It is a brilliant film, perhaps the best Finnish film ever made, and its multiple problems of cultural and political clashes and intricate relationships gather together in a universal drama of the loss of humanity in the storms of a civil war.