Add a Review

  • I've just finished watching the whole series over a period of a month or so. This series is hard to rate, due to inconsistency -- not the actors' fault - the writing for these series is distinctly weird. It starts off as a pretty good series, then sometime around the middle or end of S2 it becomes distinctly bad, then for s3 and maybe early s4, almost too bad to watch, then it gets tolerably good again.

    I didn't mind the replacement of Helen, in fact I thought the last Helen was the best of the lot. If she had been Helen all along, the series would have been better IMHO.

    I haven't read the books and, given the horrible clichéd writing of many of the episodes that were based on the books, I am disinclined to.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I love Inspector Lynley (Nathaniel Parker). In this, the beginning of season 4, Lynley is trying to get Helen to talk to him. Long distance, of course. I can't figure out why those two got married. Maybe the actress who replaced Lesley Vickerage when she left the show due to pregnancy won't grate on me so much.

    In this episode, Havers has recovered from being shot at the end of season 3, and joins Lynley in investigating the shooting of a beautiful woman in a village. She turns out to have cheated on her husband with more than one man, so naturally they're suspects, along with the husband. However, a tragedy which occurred many years ago ties into the current murder, and it's up to Lynley and Havers to figure it out.

    This is a good mystery, with Lynley and Havers in fine form, with Lynley attempting to advise Havers on a windfall of money she is receiving due to her injury. He doesn't recommend a cruise.

    Entertaining.
  • My review is based Season 1 - 4.

    We really enjoyed the first two seasons, Season 3 Lynley became increasingly annoying and by Season 4 he was completely unlikable. Even though the character had a privileged upbringing he wasn't an arrogant so-and-so the first season but was by the end of the 4th.

    The character was painfully rude to colleagues, especially Barbara. She had to take the brunt of his sulking and arrogant behavior all the while doing the real police work. I don't expect the main character to be without flaws but I do want to root for them, I stopped caring about him mid-way through the series. Too bad the show wasn't The Inspector Havers Mysteries, she was marvelous.
  • The BBC Series is based on novels by Elizabeth George and original scripts. The stories are about two seemingly mismatched London detectives. He is the polished DI Thomas Lynley the eight Earl of Asherton, and his parter is Barbara Havers a sloppy, working class DS. His colleagues think he is a rich, spoiled, golden boy who is a detective as a hobby. She is thought to be difficult and unmanageable. Both have troubled home lives and both are overly dedicated to their jobs. They bicker and they fight, but all while a real respect grows.

    I really great series that has yet to get the respect it deserves from the BBC. It is fun to watch this partnership that was thrust upon them by their bosses (with the hopes of getting rid of both of them),click right from the beginning. If you watch it from the pilot "A Great Deliverance" to through to the most recent series, you can see the partners' relationship really develop nicely. In many ways they are more alike them different. Both use the job to avoid the problems in their personal lives. Some even argue that the actor have brought romantic chemistry to the TV show that is not in the books.

    Really worth seeing.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Four British detective-type series from the noughties stand out...Inspector Lynley, Rosemary and Thyme, The Last Detective, and Judge John Deed. All of these series finished before their time unfortunately. Inspector Lynley should have run longer than six seasons as it really is a top drawer police drama.

    Maybe the lack of police chases or whatever meant The Inspector Lynley Mysteries wouldn't get the longevity it deserved. So many things about this fine series is appealing. The understated emotions between Lynley and Havers - all credit to the scriptwriter, director and of course the actors Nathanial Parker and Sharon Small. I also liked the contrasts between the locations outside of London, with London itself. Great scenery and atmosphere.

    The Inspector Lynley Mysteries deserves a reboot big time, seriously. It's not too late to bring back this fine, distinguished series.
  • tedg2 January 2011
    I have now rewatched several of these, and have refined my appreciation.

    The usual models for these sorts of projects is to distribute the episodes among different directors and screenwriters, assuming that the continuing characters are what matters. This series is different. The producers kept a firm hand on the way the episodes are framed; there is a consistent framework carried from one to the other that understand George's structure perhaps better than she does herself.

    There is a murder or two. The dynamics of this murder happen in their own word, a world of madness or unraveled anger. The sense behind this is fantastically abstract, and is framed by a sort of soap opera centered on the events and characters that are suspects.

    A more human, immediate layer — an entire third world — is the soap opera of a quite different nature in the lives of the continuing characters: Lynley and Havers. He is derived from Peter Wimsey, a second order aristocrat engaged in justice for his own reason. He has friends and lovers. Havers is an abrasive young lower class woman, struggling with family issues. This world is layered as well between Lynley and Havers.

    One can easily imagine George seeing herself as Havers, watching and commenting on Lynley as he tries to understand the dynamics of the world he has entered to solve the crime, and find the embedded "world of motive."

    This layered narrative format is understood by the producers of the series. Significant attention is paid to camera distance to register intimacy or lack of it. In particular, Havers is always the omphalos of the thing. Sharon Small is the actress who has taken on this central role and she is simply magnificent in it. She has the job of being a person in the thing, but that is an ordinary chore for an actor. She also has to be the observer and observer of the observer as the writer's surrogate. We never lose sight of the fact that this is a novelist's construction and she has included herself in the world as its origin.

    Ted's Evaluation -- 3 of 3: Worth watching.
  • I never read the novels so all I know of Lynley is the tv show. As far as British mystery show go it's not Morse, Lewis or Holmes. Also the two actresses who play Helen are so different that it makes no sense. Nathaniel Parker is good as the aristocratic Lynley and Sharon Small is cute and tough as Havers. As a midwestern American I love seeing the English countryside and the camera work is great. I bought the entire series on DVD and overall it's a worthwhile show. It does have it's weak points but taken as a whole it's very good. It could've been great, but just missed it. That said I will re-watch the shows.
  • I have really enjoyed this series. I have not read any of the books so I cannot comment on how true it is to them and really do not care. As a stand alone series I love all of the characters and I especially think Nathaniel Parker is a beautiful man and he and Sharon Small have an excellent chemistry. It is a dark show and the characters are neither perfect nor brilliant and they solve crime the old fashioned way. In other words, it is very non-Hollywood. I don't know how indicative they are of how crimes are investigated in Britain but I assure you CSI isn't even remotely close to how things are done in the US. I also like that the characters are not in their 20's and are mature, seasoned people. This is the only series that I have actually purchased. I cannot praise this show enough. I did not give it 10 stars simply because I know it isn't perfect.
  • Great stories, good acting and compelling but somehow I am so down after watching these.
  • I do admit it is not my absolute favourite of all detective shows, Inspector Morse gets that honour, but The Inspector Lynley Mysteries is a very underestimated and compelling one, made possible by the superb performances of Nathaniel Parker and Sharon Small, who play two somewhat mismatched detectives Tom Lynley and Barbara Havers. Their chemistry was very believable and grew in the show's run. All the episodes were very well shot, and the locations were beautiful. The story lines were interesting, some are slower moving than others, and there were one or two disappointing final solutions, but other than those two minor problems the stories are fine. The dialogue is well written and delivered, the banter between Lynley and Havers always working a treat, and the direction of each episode is convincing enough. Overall, a very good detective show, not the best, but the worst? No. 9/10 Bethany Cox
  • Trilby1611 April 2022
    This is not my all-time favorite British police procedural, but I like it well enough to keep watching, in general.

    HOWEVER! The "Helen" that suddenly appears in Season 5 is not Helen at all. You would think a somewhat clever detective-- even someone besotted with original Helen for some reason-- would notice that this is a completely different woman. Not only is this fraudster "Helen" a polar opposite of real Helen in terms of looks, but she has undergone a total personality transplant as well! She doesn't even seem the least bit interested in doing any profiling-- Real Helen's specialty! She is also larger, has a more flamboyant wardrobe, and doesn't look pained all the time. Or at all! It's almost like this new "Helen" never tragically lost a baby. I cringe every time I see Lord Asheton make puppy eyes at this imposter "Helen." Which makes it a hard watch.
  • I find this series very satisfying. It is character driven and has compelling dialog between Lynley and Sgt Havers. Havers is the real star of the show. She has very real problems in addition to working with her ponce of a boss. She lives paycheck to paycheck while caring for her parents, who suffer from dementia. How she juggles this situation with the need to be seconded to different locations to work on cases creates real angst in her character. In comparison, Lynley's problems are more social, as he frequently moralizes over dilemmas in his love life. Still, the rich detective and the hardscrabble sergeant work well with one another while solving cases that are twisty and intelligent. Like CSI, many of the cases are fashioned after recent cases in the news, so to say they are far fetched is not true. Try it out. You'll like the series.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This show is really solid but sometimes its strangely conservative. I realize this show is from 2004, but even in other shows from the time I'm not used to abortion being talked about like a horrid decision. One episode is super transphobic out of nowhere. This might have to do with the source material, you can almost feel the writing staff trying to make up for it. It's still well written and some great performances. Casting is great too. Just occasionally really puts me off.
  • This was disappointing after so many years of positive feedback and recommendations. It was "daytime detective" type stuff and I have a soft spot for Sharon Small but she was just not doing it for me. The faux London accent was all over the place. Sometimes Dick van Dyke to a posh north west England accent . Real shame. I just didn't get any chemistry between the main characters of Havers and Lynley. Understand the books see the relationship as asexual which is absolutely fine but the backgrounds of both were so confused and contrived. Stories were ok . Some real stands out I could count on one hand. The carousel of superb character actors couldn't gel this for me. I think it was right to end as it did. Real shame for me anyway.
  • It's a very good series, one that seemed to run for longer than it's twenty three episode run.

    Based on the novels of Elizabeth George, the Series saw Highly educated, suave Inspector Lynley solve crimes alongside his colleague DS Havers, a little more down to Earth. Known for being hard to work with, Havers would form an unlikely, strong bond with Lynley.

    I like the earlier episodes best, they feel more raw somehow, the later series are still good, but feel a bit too polished.

    The acting was always great, I loved both Small and Parker, there were many strong guest performances throughout, Sophie Ward in particular.

    It ran its course, and ended on a strong episode, it's not up there with Morse, Endeavour and Vera I would say, but it's not far off. 8/10.
  • ejev18 December 2008
    Having seen the television version before reading the books, I can heartily recommend the video version over the print one. It takes liberties with stories, as any script-from-a-book would, but stays close to the characters. The chemistry between Lynley and Havers grows nicely, with a wall that will never go away that keeps any romantic entanglements out of the picture. As much as some might like to see that, it would ruin a really good friendship between unlikely people. The episodes are well shot, in beautiful locations, and constructed in a way that keeps you wondering how they're going to find their way to the end of this episode. The shame is that they were cancelled before being allowed to have one wrap-up episode. A good watch, but don't worry about reading the stories.
  • Can't believe the reviews that suggest Lynley was portrayed as likeable, attractive or even insightful in this series. He was played as arrogant, self-involved, totally insensitive to his offensive behavior. Shame.
  • ronlda6 June 2023
    We tried to like this series; we really did. But, there was just no compelling reason to keep watching and after 4 episodes, we decided it just wasn't worth our time. The main characters are both so absorbed in their own worlds that they never really strike a balance between their personal and professional lives and while the premise had good possibilities, the writers and/or actors were just never able to pull it off. Those issues combined with confusing stories, loose ends left hanging and mediocre acting performances resulted in a lot of storytelling with no story. There are so many good British detective shows and series but this isn't one of them.
  • cbe4191920 December 2015
    I like the stories and the contradiction in characters with Lynley and Havers. It would happen and it gives a broad view of the crimes and their details rather than having two people from the same background. They have their problems but work together well in solving the mysteries. Sharon Small is a favorite of mine anyway but I like Nathaniel a lot too. I recognize the Jensen Interceptor in the first lot but what is the red car he drives later on. The "Helen" character is a dead loss and superfluous in the extreme. She gets In the way and contributes zilch. I like the series a lot, the stories are complex and different. A few of the episodes are exceptional.
  • Just watched the entire 3 series again for the 3rd time! A brilliant production, which I marked down 1 point only because of a certain inconsistency in quality of plot. Some episodes were truly stunning, and often in very atmospheric settings. Others were rather weaker.

    Overall stupendous acting, and a moving and compelling relationship between the two main characters. Their interplay alone makes the series worth watching. Both characters are utterly convincing and indeed inspiring as people. There are many duos as detectives, but this is one of the best.

    Having them detect all around the country is a tad unrealistic, but makes for a great variety of settings, which is fun.

    Very sorry they stopped it at 3 series. Surely Havers and Lynley would have got together at some stage!
  • I decided to watch this series again from episode one and I really enjoyed it. However I found miserable Helen annoying and then in the last few episodes she had a complete personality transplant when a different actress played her. Lynley meanwhile had turned into a misery but I didn't understand why bringing in another actress, presumably Helen one wasn't available, they bumped her off, so more Lynley misery. Havers was brilliant but they should have given her a romance, and an extremely pregnant woman officer ( Lisa Tarbuck) was unbelievable. The story lines were strong until the last few as Havers acted like the senior officer. It was an enjoyable watch but the plug was pulled like Foyles War because it was too expensive. However they bought that back, why not Lynley?
  • I despise the Helen character. First of all, that woman is a mess, not suited for Lynley at all and she's always arguing with him and putting him down. The woman is a total mess!! She is not even nice looking. She is very plain and full of herself plus she is annoying as hell!!!

    I cannot stand her, and because of that character, I stopped watching.
  • I've read a couple of Elizabeth George's Inspector Lynley books and after the second one I gave up: George's style is to get into the heads of everyone, which is fine, but those monologues go on and on and are often not relevant to the plot. I found her treatment of Havers, which apparently is supposed to provide comic relief, precious and time-wasting. The books are overwritten, but who am I to argue with her popularity.

    The TV show dispenses of most of the interminable inner character monologues (of course). Yay. I know there are those who complain about Lynley and Havers being miscast, but I don't care about that-I think Nathaniel Parker is great as the principled, but emotional detective inspector who is quite inept with the opposite sex; Sharon Small's Havers is smart and insecure, mouthy, sensitive-well played. The characters are fleshed out through the action for the most part, and the glimpses into their personal lives are just enough. And the stories with their characters and twists and turns are interesting and moving-and not overly sentimental.

    Sadly, in the latter seasons the show tried to imitate the popular American CSI high-tech procedurals. Little by little the producers worked on Sharon Small to be more attractive and less rough. Car chases entered the picture and subtlety started to disappear. As much as I loved the show, I'm glad it stopped when it did. It became too much of a carbon copy of the American stuff. (Mind you, I loved the original Law & Order procedural, which shared the same restraint as the Lynley Mysteries.)
  • Warning: Spoilers
    The mysteries are tricky and intricate and at times perverse and bleak. But they are always solved, except maybe once when a fake solution was accepted. Inspector Lynley is maybe posh, as The Guardian said, since he is a Lord by birth and practices policework as a profession, one of these few professions a hereditary lord can practice. There are very few.

    His assistant is a woman who is quite different from him but the two together are a funny pair more or less always staying within acceptable irregularities according to police ethics. But Lynley is going to the crime with his impulsive belief and conviction, whereas Barbara Havers goes to it with her empathy. When dealing with criminals and psychopaths, empathy is a weak point since the criminals and psychopaths just want this empathy so that they can play on it and manipulate the police, the situation they are in. The last case is typical of that. Two criminals absolutely equal in horror and viciousness and they play differently on the two cops to capture somewhere the empathy or the hostility they need to save their fate, at least if they have any future fate. They seem to think so.

    But in all these cases, it looks like some salient features are coming out like the fact many of these cases concern children or teenagers or very young men or women becoming the victims of people older than they are. But in the last two seasons, they seemed to have come to some kind of a dead end. The first paramour of Inspector Lynley moved out of the police after a dramatic accident that killed her baby-to-be. One season later she came back under the name of another actress but to be purely shot dead by some Bosnian woman trying to shoot the man who killed her whole family in Bosnia. So, Lynley had two wives in the series, and in both cases, they ended dead or at least estranged after the death of their unborn child.

    There is maybe slightly too much of this family business and maybe not enough of the crime side of the cases. The criminals are too often psychopaths who do not have any depth. They are just psychopaths, and that is the way the cases are dealt with which is the problem. It is always some technical connection between a crime and a criminal, but no real exploration of the motivations. The first wife of Lynley in the series was a profiler but her profiling was very dry, as dry as a fingerprint on a weapon or some DNA on a glass. You could do better than that, even when you are the Earl of Asherton. The empathy side of Barbara Havers is better but it never has the upper hand.

    That's OK if you are only looking for some entertainment because the social or cultural depth is rather shallow, gliding over things as if they were hawks and then pouncing onto the prey as if the prey were a juicy piece of running rat or rodent.

    Dr. Jacques COULARDEAU
  • I enjoyed the novels but this series is boring as hell. Terrible writing, Sharon Small acts circles around Nathaniel Parker whose character as presented is a total jerk and deserves the scorn his co-workers have for him
An error has occured. Please try again.