User Reviews (4)

Add a Review

  • mt176828 September 2012
    Warning: Spoilers
    This thing is one of the most clichéd films I have seen in a long time.

    The story follows Tony Valdez a skateboarder who losses his parents to their unscrupulous business partner and becomes a vigilante hero in order to avenge them.

    Seriously, how many times have we seen this type of back story. The loss of a loved one has been done to death in almost every incarnation of Spiderman and Batman.

    Don't worry the clichés continue with the girl that admires him from a distance and dates a rival as rebound.

    Another minor problem is the time it takes for the hero to suit up as the Condor.

    Now that I have done moaning time for me to talk about the plus side. Well the voice acting is pretty decent and I'd say that a couple of the characters are well written.

    As for the animation it's OK, not great but far from terrible.

    My final thought is, only watch of you are massive Stan Lee fan or love Superhero movies.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Make no mistake, Stan Lee is one of the greatest storytellers that has ever lived. He helped create some of the most iconic comic book characters in pop culture with his trust colleagues Jack Kirby and Steve Ditko. The Condor, sadly, is NOT one of those iconic characters. Co-written by fellow comic book writer Marv Wolfman and directed by Steve E. Gordon (who's no stranger to superhero projects as he worked on X-Men: Evolution), this film came out in 2007 and was released under Stan Lee's POW! Entertainment label. Conceptually, there's potential for the character of the Condor to be a great superhero in his own right. Tony Valdez is a Latino skateboarder who get's has to learn how to walk again while also stopping crooks and dastardly villains. Sounds interesting, but where the film ultimately falters is in the characters. Tony Valdez isn't a very relatable or even likable character. He's a skateboarder who cares about his cousin...and that's it. Tony isn't given much of a personality and try as Wilmer Valderrama might (and believe me, he tries), Tony just sounds so disinterested in everything. I get he's supposed to be laid back, but he still has to emote and have some energy to him. Valeria is first introduced walking up to Tony and kissing him, much to his surprise. Umm, excuse me? First of all, they just met and second of all Tony just accepts it? It also doesn't help that her only personality trait is she's the sexy girlfriend. Then it's revealed that she's the masked villain Taipan who wears body armor, has a voice modulator, is skilled in martial arts and has shows mord personality than she does without the suit. I almost want to believe Taipan and Valeria were two separate characters until the writers realized the villain needed a personal connection to the hero (as most of Stan Lee's most iconic villains do). The thing is though, the solution was right there in front of them in the form of Tony's cousin: Reuben. The most egregious sin this movie commits is not making the central theme of this movie about family. Sure, the topic is no stranger to Stan Lee, but it could've been handled so well here had they made the villain Reuben and not Taipan. Throughout the film, Reuben is bullied and threatened by the dangerous gang in his neighborhood and because of Tony's obliviousness, Reuben becomes a full time member. This film could've tapped into that and Reuben could've been the embodiment of Tony's pride amplified by the technology Nigel (the generic British business man) manufactured. Instead Reuben is sidelined and his subplot is completely superfluous to the main plot. Reuben and Tony's last encounter even ends anticlimacticly as Reuben rejects Tony's help. I will say this, the rest of the voice acting is pretty good. I like how Scott McNeil portrayed Dogg, making him sound almost like Michael Clark Duncan (who would've instantly bumped the rating up by 1). I also like the animation; it's a nest Western anime style I always appreciate. The action scenes are pretty well handled too, but I would've liked to have seen more of that. Overall, The Condor is a film I wish was bettee than it was. It's got nice animation, solid voice work (for the most part), alright action scenes and some pretty cool ideas, but it's bogged down by weak characters, a predictable script and really slow pacing. It's watchable, but not worth watching I'm afraid :/
  • Take the visuals of shows like M. A. S. K., the original TMNT, GI Joe, etc... Add in that Stan Lee sprinkle with a traumatic hero origin story (that he gets over super fast except when he can play for the sympathy vote 😉) but without the huge backstory, reboots and recasts of the X-Men and you get Condor.

    Is it high art? Absolutely not. Is it an outstanding representation of the genre that will draw in fans from far and wide? Nope. But what it *is* is a fun, nostalgic, cartoon film that you can just switch off and watch. It's not trying to be something it's not.

    And the fact that the main characters all seem to be Central/South American descent or Pacific Islanders was a nice touch. The last time I remember seeing that sort of representation in cartoons was Captain Planet or Mysterious Cities of Gold (which I haven't seen in years and I'm sure had sooo many problems if we look at it today...)

    5/10 for the story as it's literally the stereotype of the hero creation arc. But it gets extra bonus points for the nostalgia (and because I have a huge crush on Wilmer Valderama! 😁)
  • An interesting look at a lesser known superhero. Surprisingly despite the premise of the movie being a little silly there is a lot of depth and maturity to the plot.

    It's a great rainy day movie to watch (Probably alone). An excellent standalone movie especially given the rather silly "power" of this superhero.

    Low stress and relaxing.