User Reviews (79)

Add a Review

  • darkandor27 December 2008
    I agree with a lot of the posters aside from one thing. The movie itself was good, they did a lot with limited budget. Nothing seemed cheap and the "gore" was well done. Blood looked like blood and not the usual red kool-aide on low budge movies.

    The acting was good. Even the unheard of actors, maybe first film all did a bang up job.

    Directing was good, aside from a little over use of the choppy action scene I had no problems.

    The script was well written, it didn't leave you any big hole that for some reason most movie do not seem to care about.

    The only and BIG problem was the ending. So cliché. One slight change and this would have been an 8 and not a 6.
  • A group of former rocket scientists (presumably, as they worked for jet propulsion laboratories) takes over a small town supermarket in order to find and stop the spread of an evil alien menace. Things go a bit off track when their spotter dies and they have to resort to secondary methods in order to determine who is or isn't an alien.

    There is a message board thread for this film that bears the title, "Ruined by a Bad Name". I could not agree with this more. I was aware of the film's existence for months and was hesitant to see a film called "Alien Raiders", because it's frankly a really stupid name. Even when my review copy arrived, I was reluctant to give it a fair chance simply because I figured that creative people would be able to find a better name...

    But judging a book by its cover or a movie by its title can be unfair. And this falls in that category, as "Alien Raiders" really isn't all that bad. It's certainly not great -- it went straight to DVD for a reason -- but nothing that's going to cause you to go brain dead or regret hanging out with your friends and enjoying some tasty Scotch and beer whilst the film rolls.

    The special effects were pretty decent and should be highlighted. There were aspects I hated (such as the night vision, which isn't a shock if you realize how close the director was to "The Blair Witch Project"). There were aspects I disliked, such as the alien thrashing back in forth in strobe-o-vision. But other parts, such as the regeneration and the alien makeup, were quite good. Not as good as, say, John Carpenter's "The Thing", but few films are.

    We are also treated to the high and low end of acting and character development. We are given two actors/characters who are polar opposites on the scale of enjoyability. Samantha Streets brings us "Whitney", the female protagonist. She's an important part of the film, and I suspect this may open some doors for Streets. But, we also have Rockmund Dunbar as "Kane", a gun-toting loudmouth who plays a very stereotypical "angry black man", and even pushes it a bit far. He's got no depth at all. I enjoyed Dunbar on "Prison Break", but if this is the sort of role he's going to choose for movies, just stay home.

    I don't know that this is the sort of film you should run out and see right away. There are other fine options to choose from, including Raw Feed's "Otis" if you haven't seen that yet. "Alien Raiders" offers a nice "body snatcher" story, and held my attention firmly for its duration, so that's a plus. I'm torn -- don't go out of your way to avoid it, but don't add it to the top of your Netflix queue. This is more of a backup plan.
  • In Buck Lake, Arizona, the Hastings Supermarket is apparently assaulted by a group of terrorists leaded by Ritter (Carlos Bernard) that takes clients and employees in a hostage situation. One of the team members, Spooky (Philip Newby), examines the hostages detecting who should be executed and releasing the others. When Spooky is killed by the security cop, the six last shoppers and employees are kept tied and submitted to a test in one finger. Sooner the abductors reveal that they are a team of scientists containing an alien outbreak and avoid an invasion.

    The tense and claustrophobic "Alien Raiders" has a great concept and good story. The screenplay could have a better development of characters and situation, since the identity of the king was very predictable for me; but considering the simplicity of the plot associated to the low-budget, the result was a remarkable movie with a great make-up and few special effects that exceeded my best expectations. The cast has magnificent performances and it was great to see Rockmond "C-Note" Dunbar and Mathew "Keith Charles" St. Patrick again on the screen. My vote is seven.

    Title (Brazil): "Refém do Desconhecido" ("Hostage of the Unknown")
  • I really love it when an independent film is made well. I'm all for the underdog rising above the corporate giants with their millions and billions. A film doesn't always need expensive special effects (yes sometimes they do blow u away, but the use of CGI is getting ridiculous now), and a worthy script with good actors and some creative low budget FX can be enough to keep you entertained....if you haven't been brainwashed yet that is. Getting to my point, Alien Raiders delivers because you don't expect it too (I think they chose the name because of that reason). The name sucks, the beginning with the dodgy camcording makes you think 'is this what it's gonna be like', and then wallop you become absorbed in this little gem. It may be because I love alien movies, and people's interpretations on the whole alien invasion, including what they look like and what power they possess. Yes the film is pretty much all in a supermarket and yes the protectors of the universe do some really stupid things, but we're all human. You have to look at Alien Raiders for what it is and appreciate how well it was delivered for it's small budget. The actors did a great job, they we're very convincing, and the raiders we're relentless throughout which was great. If they think you're an alien well you're in big trouble, coz they don't like aliens not one bit. The twist was mildly obvious but still it could only be one of the 5 or 6 hostages so what do you expect. Those that have been hating on this are not fans of indie flicks obviously, and probably watch Die Hard 4.0 (which I loved by the way) and think that if a car doesn't take out a helicopter then it ain't worth watching. I've seen many bad indie horror flicks and thats why this gets positive comments from me. It stands out from the crowd and except for the supermarket setting has no similarities, and is not a copy of 'The Mist' (which again I loved). Give it a go...if you don't like it....well tough I did.
  • Easily a 7. Well written, good casting, an ending which I have not seen used in awhile but it was frequent some years ago. You will be wanting to know exactly what this movie is all about for quite some time, it is given to you a little at a time. But long before the movie ends you will know, only you won't know how it ends. It is simply well written.

    I'll make a stew for you: Alien + The Thing + Hidden + Assault on Precinct 13.

    The assault on precinct 13 I mention cause they are in one single location the whole time. Really, to do so much with so little ..... OK, it is near brilliant. Better than other movies that rely upon other effects to stay interesting.

    But to rate it 8 and higher it need to be spiced up some more .... now I feel like giving it an 8, but I have to restrain myself. Nothing else to say, just go see the movie.

    This movie has been cleared by me. ;)
  • not horrible, but definitely nowhere near what everybody else is saying it is. I really thought i was gonna like it because of the positive reviews and such, but truth is, if this was a big budget movie with a theatrical release, everybody would be giving it the rating it really deserves, and people would be talking about how boring and..below average, that this movie is.. I do not understand how this movie has a 6.9 rating right now, to me, i think it should be around 5 or maybe a little less.. the actings okay and the people in it are fairly likable and believable, but its just a boring movie, with very little action, and when there is action, its ridiculously..lame i don't write a lot of reviews, but i had to for this film.. i watch a LOT of movies, and this has to be one of the worse ones I've seen recently..and i just saw vacancy 2 last night..and even that was better than this
  • This low budget but impressive little sci fi horror flick from Warner home video is a radical take on the body snatchers model. Most of the movie takes place in a supermarket where thugs take the staff and customers hostage. But as the film moves on we discover they are hunting aliens who are taken over people and one of the leaders us there. The movie is gory and fun with impressive practical effects and confident direction. It's also surprisingly creative given how many times the treatment has been done. There are some light pacing issues but all in all it's a surprisingly good watch.

    3.5/5
  • I think another reviewer got it right when he said a lot of these positive reviews sound like they were written by cast and crew. Many of these enthusiastic reviews sounded like the boilerplate you would read on the back of the DVD box when checking out the movie at the local video store.

    Anyway, the movie seems promising at first and has good suspense and mystery to begin with. I agree with previous reviewers that the beginning and set up of the plot is the best thing this movie has to offer. Once the movie gets completely underway, it loses a lot of appeal and slowly becomes more and more mediocre. Eventually the movie becomes a total bore and then is ruined by an ending that is super unoriginal and dumb. The ending also makes you wonder why you watched this movie in the first place, yes, its that bad.

    I'll be generous like the previous reviewer and give it a middling 5 score, and only because the first part is pretty good.
  • That old story. A group of people in a closed environment trying to figure out who has been infected with an Alien virus. Does that ring a bell? That's right, it's another "The Thing" rip off. Only this movie had a very restricted budget.

    Still, what "Alien Raiders" lacks in financial resources, original plot points or creative ideas for a better title, it makes up with a lot of heart blood. The makers at least try to make this interesting and thrilling and for the most part they succeed.

    There are a few flaws, however: Firstly, the Alien Raiders operate like amateurs, which is annoying but forgivable. What's worse is that the monster, once it rears its ugly head, doesn't look menacing or frightening. It's just a guy running around to bad sound effects. That kills a lot of tension. Finally, the twist ending is totally predictable. They could have at least realized it in a more appealing way, but the way the movie ends just makes you shrug your shoulder and wonder why you didn't spend the last one and a half hours re-watching "The Thing".
  • Warning: Spoilers
    What can I say about Alien Raiders? It had a decent premise with a near guarantee of a cult classic, but I wound up finishing this movie with very little understanding of it. In other words there was much information on the explanation of these "Alien Raiders" yet I got very little out of it.

    With a rather strong introduction, it started out with a group of individuals that I can't really classify them as either scientists or criminals, or a part of some secret organization. The confusing lack of explanation of our "protagonists" was rather intriguing since I anticipated disclosure of who they are and their actual intentions.

    They started the movie by this group shooting random individuals in a grocery store. Their group is led by a semi handsome boss, with the help of this supposed seer who can determine whether or not an individual is an alien infested monster. Their explanation is that there is an alien infestation that was sourced at this particular grocery store and they were sent to search and eliminate the "king" of this alien race.

    This part confused me. The alien race seems to buy groceries and call police for help, and also cry and drink alcohol. They seemed to be minding their own business. I went through this movie almost feeling sorry for the aliens disguised as human beings, and that they started mutating and killing in self defense. We go through this movie not seeing any indication on HOW the aliens infect the human population, it remains completely up to speculation. So HOW hostile are they, really? Okay so one of them kills a few people and thats because he's been shot for defending himself. I think it would have worked if the build up actually paid off with a better climax in the movie, maybe have these aliens much more menacing than they were actually portrayed here.

    The police are clichéd as incompetent as always in film, and all they do in Alien Raiders is negotiate for hostages with this semi-terrorist group. They wait until the main character is fighting with the main monster until they charge in and start firing bullets.

    Another part that bothered me, is why do they take soooo long in establishing who is an alien and who isn't, even without their "seer" around? This was probably the most drawn out sequence for such a short film. They should have just hastily cut off all their hostages' pinkies, and leave them locked in that cage they were in. They also forget to check one certain individual who wound up being "the king" alien in the end, and I saw that one coming a mile away.

    The special effects and the gore scenes are good, but they are few and far between. I've probably picked the story apart to the point of disliking it. The truth is, the movie had potential and it wasn't a complete flop. Alien Raiders has no bearing on the cult classic Feast, and it tried to be a smarter movie than it actually was. With a total of an 80 minute run time, there could have been more to it. I wanted more alien raiders than human disguises in which I only saw a total of two mutated monsters, (well more like one and a half if you count the protrusion from that women's chest). The monsters weren't overall as menacing as I wanted them to be.

    I don't recommend this movie though I give it some credit for a strong intro. If this is not a good description of my opinion of this movie, well I can only comment as much as Alien Raiders gives me.
  • I basically went into "Alien Raiders" knowing two things: It was for Raw Feed (The makers of the classics "Rest Stop" and…. "Rest Stop 2: The Revenge of George Michael") and it had a horrible title. Seriously, visions of Sci-Fi Channel Original Movies danced through my head, and not the good kind with Bruce Campbell either. Already I was thinking about just missing it. Get some rest. Save up my energy for some other movies. It's day four, after all.

    But my friend already had tickets for both of us, so I figured at the very least if it was boring I could just catch a nap.

    Well… the nap never happened. Alien Raiders rises up above its horrible title and executes a tense and exciting low-budget action/sci-fi tale. Proof of this is the fact that out of all the movies I saw (Zack and Miri, which was great; Feast 2 which was... all right; couple more... can't think straight right now), this is the only one I'm bothering to write a review for. I think it's because since it's a straight-to-DVD movie, it probably won't get it's fair share of publicity. So allow me to put on my publicity gloves (And matching pants).... ahem...

    The movie is about a small supermarket in Arizona that, one night while closing up, is over- run by a group of armed terrorists. The men claim that they have to "check" the remaining people, mentioning that "the king" is there and they have to find him/her/it. Now… obviously the title ruins any hope for keeping the movie's twist secret SPOILERthere are aliens that are in need of raidingSPOILER, but this movie still does a pretty good job at keeping the viewer engaged and wondering what the hell is going on, without ever confusing them.

    The thing I liked the most about the movie was how it ended up being a few different kind of movies in one. It's a mystery when the cops are trying to unravel the reason for the hostage situation, it's an action film (The opening shoot-out is pretty friggin' intense), it's a sci-fi movie (Aliens… being raided), and it's even got a dash of monster movie in there for good measure. The atmosphere of the movie is pretty tense throughout. And the pacing was great as well. The movie's just under 90 minutes and no part of it really lags.

    Acting-wise, TV fans are gonna' be pretty happy. The main character is played by Carlos Bernard, who we all know and love as Tony "F'ing" Almeda on "24". The character he's playing here isn't that much different from Tony, but it fits the character who, as the movie progresses, goes from being a quiet and almost creepy presence, to being a very sympathetic character. Also good was Rockmond Dunbar (C-Note from the first two seasons of "Prison Break" and one of the hit men in "Kiss, Kiss, Bang, Bang") as the heavy of the group... The guy who is all business and no non-sense... You know… the asshole. He could have easily been a one-note character, but is given a few instances to add a little flavor to his performances that help flesh the character out a little. There's another character that… I don't really want to give anything away, but he dies pretty early on and that kind of bummed me out. I would have liked to seen more of him. The rest of the cast did a great job as well, with only a few weak points here and there.

    I got to hand it to first-time feature director Ben Rock. The dude took a really tiny budget (I've heard it was anywhere from $1.5-3 million) and turned out one of the slicker movies I've seen. He and his cinematographer's use of lighting and different styles of shooting really makes this movie rise above their financial limitations. Although, it is a shame that, towards the end, they have to resort to some old tricks (Stuttery-looking action scenes, anyone?). But at least it looks better than "Automaton Transfusion", which looks like it was shot by a hyperactive kid with a camera strapped to his head while he tried to stand still.

    Overall this movie was a pleasant surprise. I'd have to give it at least an 8 out of 10. I heard this is going straight to DVD, so I definitely say give it a shot when it comes out. Hope you use this review.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Alien Raiders start out from a good idea - some bug-like aliens snatch humans body and hide inside with an unknown purpose. Yes, this have been done before, but it's still a good idea, especially the tense part where they have to find out who is and who is not alien in that grocery. Unfortunately, the people who organize the alien hunt don't look to good. First, they are quite incompetent in securing the place. Second, they check around the grocery as individuals, without someone to back them up. Third, using knives in one to one fights against infected people instead of heavy machine guns to kill is , well, ineffective. Fourth, keeping hostages without restraints is an invitation to trouble. Beside all this weak points, the movie has a good pace and pull of a lot of tension. All in all, a indie movie with a lot of heart, despite his shortcomings and proof that avoiding CGI is much better for any action movie, no matter his status.
  • I usually like darkly lit movies where you really can't tell what's going on. This is an exception, and immediately called to mind, "The Mist", Stephen King's baby, and much, much better.

    With "The Mist" you have character development, and actually care about what happens with the actors populating the story.

    I did watch "Alien Raiders" through to the end, but I felt robbed of part of my life.

    Now some people like "Alien Raiders", and it even won a few obscure awards; I have to disagree.

    If it was the only movie out there like it, you might want to watch it.

    With "The Mist" available, I'd just skip this one altogether. "The Mist" has it own pretty obscure nominations and wins (more), and a bunch more fan upvotes than this one.

    I agree with the popular thinking for once.

    And, Merry Christmas, y'all!
  • QinetiQ23 December 2008
    Warning: Spoilers
    Like everyone else I agree that the title is the worst part of this movie.

    For a low budget movie it turned out pretty good. Good acting, right pace, all that. There's nothing that really bugged me, apart from some usual 'why-do-that' moments.

    I didn't have any info what it was about (apart from it being about aliens/infections) so I was going in blind. The start is nifty, with what seems like a robbery but turns into a bloodbath right away. It is not fully packed with action, but it doesn't really get dull at any points. One of the few things that annoyed me was the shaky cam when the alien roars, it wasn't needed IMO.

    One could start about lack of CGI but come on, it's a low budget movie and they did a good job making it entertaining. I enjoyed it.
  • trashgang24 September 2009
    Covers in green always attract me to them, I can't tell why, maybe because Alien had that too. Not knowing what to suspect you are immediately into this flick. It start off with what you think is a robbery it turned out that they aren't robbers but alien hunters. They didn't put much effort in giving us to like the persons. Off it goes from the start to the end. And it does that in a bloody way. The tests they are doing to know who carries the alien inside him did remind me of The Thing. It's a nice surprise to see that a low budget can be entertaining too. Of course it's a movie with an open ending so maybe they will do part 2 but first watch this one, it's not frightening but it has suspense.
  • greggman27 December 2008
    Warning: Spoilers
    This movie is total crap. The idea was nice but the movie itself was just bad.

    ***SPOILER** I can live with cheap effects but I can't live with 10 cops standing around doing nothing while an alien try to kill another guy right in front of them nor can I buy the cops thinking it's just a simple case of bad guys when they can hear the alien screams outside. There's tons of other situations like that in the movie where the writing makes absolutely no sense.

    AVOID THIS MOVIE.

    It looks like it's time to start a competitor to IMDb. At the time of this post the rating was at 6.8. This movie deserves a 1. It's not silly enough to laugh at. It's just bad.
  • ALIEN RAIDERS is a low budget alien-busting B-movie, set in a shopping mall of all places. It's an entirely derivative film that proudly wears various influences on its sleeve: the dark and shadowy after-hours aisles of INTRUDER; the single-location-under-siege set-up of ASSAULT ON PRECINCT 13; the mutating creature from SPLINTER; plus, most notably, the monsters and scenario from THE THING, of which a crucial set-piece or two are borrowed directly.

    Still, this turns out to be an enjoyable little movie thanks to some strong writing and direction. Director Ben Rock makes a shadowy and atmospheric moment with some unsettling and in-your-face frightening moments when the aliens are exposed, all down to some creepy soundtrack noises. The choreography isn't quite as good, but the film does benefit from a crisp realism and some well-drawn characters. If you're a fan of the genre you might just consider this to be a little-seen gem.
  • Alien Raiders, a low-budget horror flick revolving around paranormal mystery, is a key example of the genre's most common faults. Despite starting off in a strong vein, building momentum and establishing character, the movie doesn't take long to reach a point of stagnancy. The second half, which succumbs to the now cliché structural devices of having characters be popped off one by one whilst running around the dark, belittles what promise is shown in earlier moments. What results from this is a disappointing experience that titillates but never fulfils. Horror die-hards may want to give it a shot simply because it does have its fair share of scares and tense atmospheres, but for everyone else, this is simply a case of too little stretched out for too long; a tired exploitation of a strong premise.

    Taking place during the holiday season, Alien Raiders centres around a supermarket which is promptly taken under siege with all people inside as hostages. From here the movie divulges into a series of intrigue-building scenes which prompt us to believe that this simply isn't a robbery; in fact, it might just be from out of this world, literally speaking. At this point the feature is fluid, interesting and engaging, not just from its expertly paced structure, but through its construction of characters. Sure enough, these aren't the most compelling of personalities to spend ninety minutes with, but they at least show promise of going somewhere. Disappointingly however, it isn't long before we realise that no, this really isn't going anywhere at all.

    The remainder of the movie's runtime is devoted largely to killing off the main cast, very slowly. All the while, we are given overt hints as to special plot twists and turns to come later on- not only are they made too obvious to the point that when they happen we feel underwhelmed, but the twists themselves are largely inconsequential. So what the movie essentially boils down to during its middle and later acts is a lazy excuse for delivering drawn-out scares. Granted, there are moments when Alien Raiders achieves a real sense of foreboding atmosphere and horror, but such moments are so far and few between long, inane dialogue scenes that they irrevocably lose much of their visceral impact. A contrasting of the movie's opening shots and those that end it reveal obvious differences in tension and pacing- Alien Raiders is a movie that relies on its audience members being confused, so when things begin unravel, a distinct lack of development from there on in hurts its ability to grasp the attention of the viewer.

    Aesthetically speaking however, the feature is remarkably solid for such a small production. Performances from the main cast are strong; even if their characters are too often found spouting cliché lines from the book of scares and thrills 101. Visual effects and production values too are impressive in their concise simplicity that do well not to draw attention to themselves. In this sense Alien Raiders often reminded me of this year's similarly shot (and located) Stephen King adaptation The Mist, combining simple photography and effects with interesting ideas and passable performances. Yet burdened with the fact that a lot of the characters inevitably meet their demise in untimely fashions, a distinct lack of interesting qualities outside of its aesthetics too often means that such elements go to waste.

    By the time you inevitably reach the end of Alien Raiders (that is, if you indeed make it that far), you will no doubt be left with a sour and bitter aftertaste. Despite starting off on extremely good footing, the movie deteriorates into a sloppy mess, wasting characters, performers and a solid premise in favour of trying to be like every other Hollywood horror out there. Rather fittingly, the movie's final note is one of bewildering inconsequentiality- it's one of those twists that are more or less pointed out fifteen minutes into the movie and then restated every other ten; the only mystery then is guessing just when in the third act the proverbial carpet will be pulled. If there's any reason to put yourself through the experience, it's simply to see the promise that those involved so obviously have. Perhaps with a little more focus and development, a project such as this could have been made into something of much greater value but this sadly isn't the case. In conclusion I must reiterate that Alien Raiders isn't a horrible movie; it's just a really disappointing one.

    • A review by Jamie Robert Ward (http://www.invocus.net)
  • A title like 'Alien Raiders' conjures up images in my mind of a cheesy Charles Band production from the mid-80s—you know... the kind with rubber aliens, badly matted spaceships, and laser weapons; it might come as a bit of a surprise then, to discover that the film is not a gloriously daft B-movie set in the far-flung future, but rather a hard-edged sci-fi thriller that starts off promisingly enough, but which ultimately proves to be nothing more than a shameless rip-off of John Carpenter's classic 'The Thing', minus the impressive gloopy effects.

    Set in the small-town of Buck Lake, AZ, the film opens with a group of gun-toting scientists storming a grocery store, where they emotionlessly shoot a few people before taking the rest of staff and customers hostage. This part of the film is handled very well by director Ben Rock: it's brutal and exciting, and keeps the viewer intrigued by having them kept as much in the dark as the terrified hostages. However, once the reason behind the sudden violence is revealed—the scientists are trying to contain a nasty organism that uses humans as its host—the blatant cribs from Carpenter's film become glaringly obvious, and the film immediately loses much of its appeal.

    One scene in particular copies 'The Thing' far too closely for comfort: in order to find out who is host to the creature, the scientists conduct a test that involves cutting off a finger of each hostage. When they finally hack off the digit of a carrier, the creature reacts in a nasty manner, attacking those in the room. It was at this point, I lost all respect for the film and its makers, especially seeing as they didn't even have the decency to throw in any nifty prosthetics or gore, instead opting to have the camera shake around as though its operator was suffering from an epileptic seizure (a trick they use several times to save on proper effects).

    By the time this film had finished, I actually wished it had been a cheesy Charles Band movie from the mid 80s: at least I wouldn't have felt quite so let down.

    I rate Alien Raiders 7/10 for the first half and 2/10 for the second half; that averages out as 4.5/10 for the whole thing (which I'll generously round up for IMDb).
  • Judging by the title, the DVD-cover and the year of release, I would normally never even bother to watch this "Alien Raiders"… I'm a huge fan of old alien invasion movies, more particularly from the fifties and the eighties, because they feature crazy chaotic plots, outrageously cheesy special effects and a cast full of washed up B- movie stars. I don't like "new" alien invasion movies because they usually feature imbecilic plots and lousy computer-engineered effects. But a friend advised me to nevertheless check out "Alien Raiders", and I can understand why, because this is definitely one of the more inspired and entertaining low-budget Sci-Fi movies of the past two decades. The film is arguably derivative of the previous year's hit film "The Mist", as it copies the setting as well as a handful of other ideas, but there are plenty of aspects to guarantee an hour and a half of good old-fashioned and action packed Sci-Fi/horror fun. Two days before Christmas, in the sleepy little time of Buck Lake – Arizona, a troop of heavily armed militants invade the cozy Hasting Supermarket shortly before closing time. Everyone assumes they are robbers or terrorists, but in fact they are some kind of violent scientists in search for extraterrestrial parasites that are allegedly present here. The group's well-planned routing goes awry when their paranormal medium (a big-eyed freak that scans people's brains) gets shot and they have to conduct their alien identification tests via old-fashioned and unorthodox methods. Meanwhile, police forces and hostage negotiators gather outside the supermarket. What I like most about "Alien Raiders" is that it's 100% unpretentious and straightforward. It's clear that director Ben Rock and his crew don't aim to win any originality prices or cinematography Oscars, but at least everyone who was involved in this production does their job professionally. The acting performances are more than decent, without any big names in the cast list, and there are a couple of nicely gooey make-up effects and nasty slaughters. The last 10-15 minutes are rather dull, predictable and disappointing
  • While the idea behind the storyline was interesting, the movie just wasn't outstanding. Why? Well, because there is not much of any alien in the movie, and when you do get to see the parasitic entity, everything was just too dark. Personally, then I don't like it when film makers have to shoot it in a near pitch-black environment. I pay money to see the movie, not to speculate about what it would be.

    The movie was fast paced, and sort of had a whole "Invasion of the Body Snatchers" thing going on. Director Ben Rock did manage to set up the movie in a way that was great for building up suspense.

    It should be said that the acting was quite good, and it was interesting to have the entire movie take place in a supermarket. Such a decision does add pressure to the director and actors, as it somewhat imposes a limitation. But they all pulled it off quite nicely.

    But the movie was dragged down by a lack of showing off the creature, and there was just something extraordinary missing to make the movie unique. But all in all, an entertaining movie if you like Sci-Fi action movies that require little or no thinking at all.
  • This movie is definitely not going to win any awards. It's also not going to make any top 10 lists at the end of the year. It won't even make cult status.

    What it will do is entertain you & keep you on the edge of your seat.

    The premise is simple. A group of independent "alien hunters" have descended on a small town, and specifically a grocery store where they seem to have found the original infection. Do they do the best job securing the location?? No. Do they seem dis organized, and nervous?? Yes. But I think that adds to the plot. These are not trained police officers, or ex military men. They are regular Joe's that have found something that needs to be stopped.

    What's most impressive is the way the tension is built throughout the film. You feel the same claustrophobic tension that you get in Splinter, and there's a similar feeling to the great Spanish film "rec" This movie isn't quite as good in quality as those two movies, but there's a good mix of "what the heck is going on" and "how is this whole thing going to end."

    There are very limited special effects in this movie, and when used they add to the story, they don't take away. There's almost no CGI, and that's a good thing. The Sci Fi channel could really learn something about creating movies like this, where you have alien invasions without using incredibly cheap and campy CGI, just a little make up, and some cool camera tricks and hold back the pay off till the last minute. It's an easy formula that's been missing from science fiction films for quite some time. Directors have fallen in love with being able to create big creatures, but don't know how to build tension.

    Now, the movie does have plot wholes, and relies on some clichés. The one cop that happens to be a hostage negotiator from "the big city." The ending isn't as surprising as they want it to be. Still, for a direct to DVD movie, this is about as good as it gets.

    It's science fiction, so suspend disbelief a bit, and imagine how you would react if you were in the characters shoes. It's an enjoyable little trip.
  • ElijahCSkuggs9 January 2009
    Like probably many of the people who come upon this flick the first you notice is the crappy title. It's very SciFi Channelish. But you also hear more and more people talk about how it rises above it's name and delivers a solid lil scifi/horror flick. And you can count me to that bunch of people. I heard it was an okay flick, but it's actually better than that.

    The flick revolves around these Alien Raiders who have pin-pointed the exact location where some of these aliens might be. Busting in like gang-busters and taking hostages is their game and doing tests on the hostages is their game. You fail the test, you're an alien, you're dead. The raiders are having some trouble distinguishing alien from human, and sh!t begins hitting the fan.

    I see all these reviews saying it's the worst flick ever and blah blah blah. It's very obvious those people don't watch many movies and they don't appreciate a low-budget picture as well. Alien Raiders more than excels at what it's trying to do. It creates tension, a solid atmosphere and keeps us entertained throughout with a pretty cool story.

    The film does have issues with some weak writing. Especially dialogue between the hostages. The picture also is much too dark. Sure it creates the atmosphere and builds up the fear factor. But it was just too damn dark. I couldn't see the violence or gore, and I couldn't even see the aliens. And from a pic I've seen, they looked pretty cool. A little like the black dude turned vampire in From Dusk Till Dawn but still pretty cool. Also probably the biggest issue for me was the predictability and ending. I'm not going to ruin it for you, but I just didn't care for it. The movie should have played out another 15 minutes or so with that type of ending. Unless...sequel?

    Alien Raiders is definitely a hidden little gem of a horror/scifi flick. Films like Altered and Brain Dead (2007), and this flick are films that fly under the radar and get belted by viewers who don't appreciate low-budget cinema. If you do appreciate it don't be swayed by the crappy title or the awful reviews. Alien Raiders is easily worth 80 minutes of your time.
  • "Alien Raiders" is as straight-forward and aware as its name, not a very memorable, original or cult-potential horror flick, but what it does - it does good. Like a typical Syfy horror, just with more added heart, humor and effort. Old set of rules, but with fun along the way.

    It's Christmastime in the small town of Buck Lake, Arizona, and a group of soldiers without a known cause enters the town's only supermarket at closing time, taking hostages and looking for something. As we soon understand, they are the ones who protect us from aliens, and the last of them evil organisms is among the people in the supermarket... And so, with jokes, drama and action along the way, It all threads down into the expected.

    The story is simple, the lore behind the mercenaries and aliens are mostly left blank. Don't know how, but there are aliens inhabiting humans around, and someone does need to stop them, right? "Alien Raiders" reminded me of "Feast", which is a similar movie plot-wise, perhaps with more dark comedy and a lot more of what "Alien Raiders" lacked a little - gore. The FX really got shown only towards the end. Visually though, it is quite fine from start to end, and never feels less than a B flick.

    This film knows what it is inside-out, and so, even though on cliché terms, it's a well-rounded adventure, where the cast and just about everyone seem to enjoy what's at play. Simple kind of horror entertainment. My rating: 5/10.
  • when i was trying to decide whether or not to see this movie i figured, 'see what imdbers have to say...' but there were only two comments and they were a bit too positive for me not to be suspicious. as in, 'they're probably connected to the movie somehow...'. but i took a chance anyways b/c i recognized one of the actors on the cover... now i know they were telling the truth...surPRIsingly good... even though the actor i recognized AND another one i recognize(though i'm too lazy to research their names ;-) were both on EXcellent TV shows... i guess 'six feet under' could be considered 'tv'. even though it's cable... the character from this show that's in the movie is the black gay cop/security person/lover of one of the brothers...David. now 'dexter', actually... the other that i first recognized was on '24'. he's the actor that plays the character 'tony almeida'. both good actors... but it's not just THEM that carry the movie...the big surprise for me is how well written it is... if i can guess too many times what dialogue will be before the characters open their mouths, i'm usually not going to watch for too long... i noticed fairly quickly that this wasn't going to be the case with this movie... and it wasn't JUST the dialogue...it was well paced, camera-work helped tell the story instead of amateurishly getting distractingly in the way... in case this isn't obvious yet, this is a recommendation... nuff said...
An error has occured. Please try again.