User Reviews (523)

Add a Review

  • It has been a while since I watched the original series so when the movie started I found it cute and nice seeing these characters that I liked back together again.

    And there interactions at the start are the movie keep it entertaining but when you head into the plot that's where things come off the rails.

    I don't understand the plot and I think that is an issue. I won't go into spoilers but it just seems so strange that they decided that this is what they would do.

    I also find that this movie doesn't work as these characters have already reached their original ending if you get what I mean.

    Charlotte has a baby, Carrie and Big are together, Miranda has her family and Samantha sound someone she could be with. This all happens at the end of the show because that is the end of the story for these characters. This can sometimes seem forced for lack of a better word.

    The jokes are also very 90s cheesy sitcom jokes too. But some people like that.

    So I would say watch it if you are a fan of the show but be prepared to be disappointed by some decisions, I think you'll enjoy it for the most part.
  • Ltufano2327 September 2023
    Let me preface this review by saying I have never seen any of the show or had any previous knowledge of this franchise. While this is not a film I would normally watch, my wife wanted to watch this and I was skeptical going in. I was pleasantly surprised to find that it was easy to jump in, 10 years of storytelling missed, and still easily got invested in each character. With a simple love story plot, my only complaint is that it is dragged out and begins to feel like multiple TV episodes stitched together, rather than a full film. All of the actresses are very well into their character and the bond they have feels genuine and they make it a delightful time. Did it convince me to go back and catch up? No, but it was a fun 2 1/2 hours spent and can easily be enjoyed by fans and newbies.
  • Calicodreamin12 January 2021
    The queens of NYC are back in spectacular fashion. Is it Oscar worthy? No, but it doesn't need to be. The storyline is on brand for the emotional chaos that was the series, I would expect nothing less. I love the display of friendship and kindness that the women show to each other in this film.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Let me begin by saying that Cynthia Nixon has an astounding neck. It's regal and first rate.

    I saw this movie and the IMDb comments motivated me to rent some DVDs and watch the show for the first time, really.

    I have to say that the show is interesting social commentary in that group X gets together to discuss group Y and reveals more about group X than Y. Like watching an episode of "The View", a show that makes you wonder, not "why are some men gay" but "why aren't ALL men gay?" It showcases women revealing themselves as freaks as they inform us that "men are freaks." Newsflash: all humans are freaks, no gender is excluded.

    SATC stars character Carrie Bradshaw but the HEROINE is Samantha Jones, who is irreverent, enlightened and has most of the best lines.

    Carrie Bradshaw, in the film and movie, is a gold-digger who SEEMS to be looking for truth via her column but in her life is looking for an upscale lifestyle provided by a rich husband.

    She is a spoiled, overly-emotional brat and the saddest part of the film (in retrospect) is when BIG marries her. Why would he? BIG is a big idiot. There's a scene in Season 2 where he unintentionally knocks CB out of bed and she turns around and punches him in the eye, which is a lovely TV example of a woman hitting a man without real provocation. Is it supposed to be cute? Why doesn't he dump her then? What an idiot.

    In the film, Carrie KNOWS there's a problem with BIG regarding the wedding but she lets it go and lets it go then gets out of her limo to hit him with flowers because he destroyed her day. No, she destroyed it by not dealing with the emotional realities, something it takes her months to realize after much male-bashing.

    Regarding the "Hubble" reference, Carrie is not the political idealist Katie was and Big is no Hubble. It's easy to say Hubble wanted someone more attractive but more accurate to say he wanted someone less complicated/idealistic. Both women are pushing their men but one is pushing him to be "better" while the other is pushing him into a commitment he doesn't want, not a valid comparison. The only thing complicated about CB is her public analysis of why a 21st century female seeking a 19th century relationship isn't working out.

    Samantha, on the other hand, is feeling sexually stifled by the studguy who cared for her during cancer (?) but leaves him, not without regret, to be true to herself. The seemingly uncaring, frivolous character who is actually better and smarter than the STAR. She even gets FAT in an effort to be faithful. Wow!

    Carrie is a user and Samantha is a thoroughly modern "with the times" heroine.

    Since a sequel for SATC is in the works, one can only pray that it's about the divorce or a whodunit murder mystery-

    "Who Killed Carrie Bradshaw?"

    Is it:

    Big, when he realizes what an idiot he was for marrying CB?

    or is it:

    her 3 friends, because she was a "modern woman with an out-of-date agenda" whiner? I'd go see that.

    In conclusion, Big is a commitment-phobe for all the right reasons. Both genders SHOULD be afraid of marriage. It's government-sanctioned, legalized love. Don't walk, RUN.
  • Duzniak3813 May 2008
    7/10
    Sexy!
    Wow, what can I say? I think that they definitely pulled this movie off! Being a huge fan of the television show, I was eager to see how it would transfer onto the big screen. And I was not disappointed. It was fresh and funny, the characters I remembered and loved were amazing as ever. It was savvy, stylish and of course, sexy. People complain that when television shows are made into a movie, it will just be a longer version of an episode of the television show. But I do not think this is the case with Sex and the City: The Movie. The plot is very well done (although still a secret, sorry) and lose ends and questions are tied. I felt this movie was very satisfying and witty. I could never expect a masterpiece when a movie is based on a television show, but I felt that the movie lived up to expectations; fashionable, incredibly witty and of course, crude as ever.
  • matt75-12 June 2008
    1/10
    One
    Warning: Spoilers
    This movie was such a disappointment: so disrespectful to the series, the characters' original complexity, and women's complexity!

    I was particularly let down by the script. First of all, the jokes were not funny. From the 'Saint Louise from St Louis' to Charlotte's Mexican incident, everything was so unlike Michael P King's style. Then the plot: predictable (Samantha's ring/ Smith being the guy getting it to her; the password of Carrie's email folder being 'love' like on the key chain...) but most of all characters were out of their 'tv series' parts. Especially Carrie: hitting Big with the wedding bouquet and screaming at him in the middle of 5th ave, really?!? Planning a honeymoon in Mexico, really (btw, the guy greets them with 'welcome to Mexico', that's …'broad' and silly…)?!? Telling Miranda 'you ruined my wedding', really? That dinner scene seemed like out of an episode of The Hills….

    I personally also found Jennifer Hudson terrible: she already won the 2008 Razzie to me (altough I should check if Sharon Stone is coming out with a new movie...).

    In general, if you think of what you saw in this movie without the affection you have for these characters, you must admit this is a terribly corny romantic comedy.

    Think of how wonderfully touching and poignant some episodes were. Like the one when Miranda finally took the courage to tell her feelings to Steve... It was titled 'One', and it was indeed a fully satisfying, beautiful episode.

    This movie is just a 1/10...
  • Warning: Spoilers
    It was okay... I expected more but it was only just okay.

    Many others have already commented that the movie was more like a double episode and that is exactly what I was thinking as I left the theatre. Yes I laughed out loud (mostly when Charlotte Poughkeepsied her pants) but the élan was gone. With the exception of Charlotte most of the characters came across as uncommunicative, pathetic, losers -- bitter old maids who just looked desperate with too much make-up. If I had just watched this movie without investing all those years in front of HBO, I would be totally bewildered as to why I should care about any of these women or their loser or invisible boyfriends (two come across as losers, the other two are invisible). Rather than revisit all the characters and develop them in some way we are introduced to new characters instead. We didn't need the psychiatrist or the personal assistant - why were they there? Isn't that what friends are for? I thought the whole point of this series was that these women could always rely on each other when all else went wrong. Nope, apparently you hire a PA and go see a shrink...

    I really would have liked to have seen more of some of the regular characters, like Harry, Anthony, and Stanford. I also would have liked to have seen a LOT less of the biggest star in the film - fashion. There is just TOO much fashion - it has become a character in the film, and its not that interesting to watch on screen. The clothes became over-the-top statements. Carrie wears a studded punk belt with her first three outfits in the movie but then leaves a pair of brand new Blahniks in a closet for 6 months without a second thought -- this is not a fashionista... despite her wearing a big bird costume covered with black net to a fashion show in the middle of February, Carrie continues to don her ratty old vintage fur coat that she has owned for over a decade. The film is unsatisfying. If you are looking for a follow-up to the final episode -- a 'where are they now' kind of thing, then you won't be happy - its more like a continuation of the same crap three years later. THe single most frustrating experience of the entire movie is the build-up to the big wedding let down. It all seemed so manufactured - a pure invention of the writer. Where was the slow tension build-up, the wedding slowly getting out of control scenes that scare Big. Nope, nothing is mentioned until its too late.

    You know, I came here to write a review for my 6 out of 10 rating, but I am going to re-vote the movie to a 4 now. The longer I think about it, the more I don't like what I saw.
  • 'Sex and the City,' based on the hilarious, poignant HBO comedy series of the same name, is grossly insulting. In a strong divorce from the series, the movie picks up five years after the series finale - where we find out that each one of the characters have become vapid, soulless versions of their former selves. Now, writer Carrie Bradshaw (Sarah Jessica Parker), and her friends Miranda Hobbes (Cynthia Nixon), Samantha Jones (Kim Cattrall), and Charlotte Goldenblatt (Kristen Davis) walk around New York obsessing over shoes, handbags, and love.

    Carrie Bradshaw was, at the end of the show, an independent woman - not the needy girl she started out as. The movie turns it's back on Carrie's development as a character, shaping her into the stock romcom lead. Think Katherine Heigl with no charm. She is now painfully unfunny, shallow, and quite possibly retarded. She spends the first half the film setting herself up to have the man whom supposedly loves her jilt her - which he does. The second half of the film, Carrie spends complaining about literally everything, dying her hair brown, and discussing bags and love with a painfully useless, annoying Jennifer Hudson, as Carrie's new assistant Louise from Saint Louis.

    CARRIE: "Louise from Saint Louis. Oh you brought me back to life." LOUISE: "And you gave me, Louise Vuitton."

    Yes the writer of "The Real Me" and "A Woman's Right To Shoes" actually wrote this garbage.

    Lawyer Miranda is now a frigid shrew who swats her deadbeat husband away like a fly every time he tries to get near her - and spends the entire 2.5 hours complaining about how marriage changed her, it made her move to Brooklyn. She is no longer likable, funny, or smart.

    Meanwhile, housewife Charlotte spends the 2.5 hours prancing around like a little girl, screaming at the top of her lungs, and carrying her confused, Asian daughter around like a dog in a handbag. The problem with continuing Charlotte's storyline on the show is her storyline came to the only logical conclusion it could have had at the end of the show. Now, it' just a retread through old territory. Davis is ultimately given a thankless role in this film.

    However, it is Samantha who is given the most honest adaptation. While certainly a cartoon version of her former self, Samantha's story revolves around her inability to maintain a monogamous relationship - despite being very much in love. However the payoff is ultimately ruined as Samantha is no longer human.

    This incarnation of 'Sex' is so incredibly shallow - it basically acts a prop to advertise luxury goods. The most obvious scenes to illustrate this are when Carrie tries on designer wedding dresses for a Vogue shoot, which goes on for an excruciating 10 minutes, followed closely by Carrie and co. going through her closet trying to decide what to take to her new apartment with husband-to-be Big (Chris Noth). The scene is ultimately pointless as she is moving to a closet that is 10 times to the size - which, if you can imagine it - is actually a plot point in a film that will make you feel compelled to throw out every designer label you own. The show was about the importance of following your own trajectory, and self actualization. The film abandons this concept.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    The last film I saw that offered an equally dark and twisted view of the human psyche, was Pasolini's Salo: a glimpse of something truly dehumanizing and a portrayal of the triumph of evil. SATC works along the same lines, establishing characters without any redeeming qualities, absolutely devoid of decency and empathy. At a certain level, one can see the film as some sort of uber-feminist dystopia, replete with scenes of symbolic castration; or maybe some sort of super-consumerist manifesto, where existence is distilled as lifestyle and an hymn to superficiality; or maybe as a nihilistic social commentary, where self-centeredness and egotism are systematically rewarded.

    One thing is for sure: it is a deeply disturbing experience for the male viewer. The male characters in this film are gay, sex toys or rich daddy figures. The 4 females leads are predatory, utterly self-absorbed, devoid of any moral compass, guilt-infusing middle aged "professionals" - exaggerated caricatures of an equal-rights fantasy gone terribly wrong. It is a combination of American Psycho, In the Company of Men and Fight Club from a female viewpoint - an immature and violent wet dream that is justified based on the " I am being me" and "I love me" principles. I challenge any man to check out the scene where Kim Katrall's character dumps her boyfriend of 5 years ( that stuck with her through chemotherapy to boot) because she "loves herself more" and not get enraged and scared at the vision offered.

    Of course, a lot of suspension of disbelief is required, since at the same time, the film borders science fiction - it is hard to digest that these women, manipulative as the may be, can actually transform successful and emotionally stable men into pathetic, apologetic train wrecks.

    If you watched this with your wife and girlfriend and she didn't spot anything reprehensible in the main characters' behaviour, you, my friend, are in deep, deep, deep trouble.
  • I thought, this is a sure-fire winner - the series was brilliant: funny, romantic, insightful, and we were left wanting more - ergo... great movie. What I got instead was sappy, uninspired writing; I actually rolled my eyes a couple of times, and I love chick flicks! These characters would never utter some of those lines. After developing such strong characters over the course of the series, someone fell asleep behind the wheel and completely short changed the viewers.

    Also, the movie is messy, trying to cram way too much into the alloted time, ending up with shallow plots all the way through. The only character plot line I believed was Samantha's. I missed the men in this movie, someone sucked the very life out of them. And finally, Jennifer Hudson's role could be neatly snipped out of the movie without it making a difference. I love her, but the role as written is way too cliché'd for even a fine actor like herself to make any sense out of.

    Saving graces: Kim Cattrall's performance and delivery, the fashion and the moments between the girls.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Like many of the others, I am a huge fan of the series (I own all the DVDs and have watched each episode multiple times).

    The translation to big screen just.doesn't.work.

    There was so much melodrama and fake crises! The male characters were like shadows of themselves. Big was like an avuncular sugar-daddy at the beginning and devolved into a limp-wristed dweeb by the time he thwarted Carrie.

    And Carrie was a shrill, melodramatic idiot who ultimately gets what she deserves. What intelligent, independent woman in her right mind would go back to the jackass who screwed you over multiple times? Why can't she just be independent? That always bothered me about the series finale.

    Miranda seems melodramatic and overreacts to Steve's indiscretion -- which comes out of nowhere and feels like a poorly timed plot device.

    Smith, who is starting to weather like Clint Eastwood, came off as way-too-casual when Samantha gave him her decision. He acted like such an airhead surfer-dude, which was never apparent in the series.

    Stanford and Anthony were like caricatures of themselves. Oh, we have a wedding, let's work in the flaming wedding planner! And didn't he and Stanford dislike each other? Why were they palling around like best girlfriends?

    I thought it was curious that Carrie's friends all showed up to help her pack her apartment, but they were nowhere to be found when the unpacking was being done. What kind of friends are those?

    The only redeeming acting came from Kim Catrall and Kristen Davis. They are totally comic pros and I enjoyed their schtick, even if it was silly. They at least pulled it off. As for Parker and Nixon, they acted like a couple of shrill witches when scorned. Ugh.
  • Being a fan of the series for years, I had pretty high expectations for this film. I was not disappointed by what I saw, and most other SATC fans I've talked to agree with me.

    The film jumps ahead 3 years in the characters' lives, and then intertwines the stories of the four women throughout the course of a year, as they each come to terms with the ending they found at the series' completion. I liked this approach, because it demonstrated the longevity (or lack thereof) of the happy endings the characters attained.

    The girls are translated well into film--I didn't feel like any of the 4 was rewritten or misrepresented from her role on the show. The male counterparts were all present--Big, Steve, Harry, Smith, Stanford, etc. The movie doesn't spend as much time on them as they do the trials of the female characters, naturally, and no relationship is depicted as closely as Carrie and Big's.

    I found the plot to be compelling and heartfelt and the female characters just as flawed and human and funny as they'd always been. And, of course, it wouldn't be SATC without the staples of designer bags and shoes, classic cocktails, and of course, a splash of nudity.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    As a film student I should really abhor a movie like this, and usually do, but you know what? I'm a woman first. I went in to this film with my friends with low expectations and came out taking stock of my own life and relationships. The women in this film are set up at the start to have gloriously perfect lives, only to be knocked down and made to realise that they are human and make mistakes no matter how old they are.

    So what if some of the humour is base and childish? If you can't be childish and laugh at stupid, everyday things then what is the point of being alive? And some viewers have had problems with the amount of moping going on in the film - this is conventionally what happens when you lose the love of your life. It is an important part of the healing process, because you are not just mourning the loss of a relationship, you are trying to come to terms with how stupid you were to let it happen to you in the first place! OK, fair enough, the goal of the producers here is to squeeze as much money out of idiots like me, but if you look hard enough there are lessons, not only to be learned, but shared. This film underneath all the glitz and glamour is about real people, real relationships, real problems, and as with real life, it throws humour into the tragedies.

    I wouldn't go out of my way to watch this again, but I'm glad I did see it, because as a woman with bad relationship experiences it spoke to me and made me feel a bit better. I still prefer Hitchcock, but there's nothing wrong with enjoying what isn't.
  • Let me preface this by saying that I am a straight female who has been a fan of the SATC series since its second season. I have every episode on DVD and have honestly seen every episode at least 5 times, including the commentaries by Michael Patrick King. That said, I could not be more disappointed in the film. To say that this movie was for fans of the series is insulting in my opinion because where the series had heart, depth and some intelligence, the movie had labels, poop jokes and lame choices by the characters.

    First of all, yes, Carrie Bradshaw is the main character, but could the other 3 women have been treating any more cavalierly? The "plot lines", if you can call them that, for the other characters seemed to be thrown into the mix just to give them something to do while Carrie ran around town, changing outfits and hair colors to the delighted shrieks of 15 year old fans. I can only imagine that was the audience the film wanted to capture because expecting grown women to follow this crap is insanity.

    Secondly, the ending of the film made me completely lose respect for Carrie. I cannot imagine an emotionally healthy 41 year old woman making the same choice she made. I think she needs intensive therapy because she is obviously a masochist who values the ability to purchase brand name couture more than her own happiness. And if the ability to buy couture is what makes her really happy, well, then, the 15 year old target audience should be thrilled.

    That said, I probably will see the sequel. I'm hoping they bring in more writers from the series to add some of the emotional oomph that this movie painfully lacked. *sigh* I just can't seem to quit SATC.
  • Since any opinion on this movie has to be tempered by sex and viewing history let me just make it clear up front that I am a man and, while I don't dislike the series, I didn't ever get into it beyond watching (and enjoying) the odd episode that someone else was watching in the same room as I was sitting. Please feel free to dismiss/accept my opinions accordingly in light of this information. My first proper reaction to the Sex & the City movie was to baulk at the running time, which struck me as pretty excessive for what it was. I was right on this as the film is longer than it probably deserves to be but at the same time it never dragged as badly as I expected. The characters are older now and, after the series ended, all partnered up to a certain degree and "happy" in their relationships. Carrie and Big have settled into a new flat and this has made Carrie think about commitment and legal connections – a path that leads to them deciding to get married. While Big gets nervous, Carrie goes planning crazy, Miranda sows the seeds of problems in her own marriage, Charlotte plays happy families and Samantha has it all except one thing.

    This plot setup creates the focus of the film – less on the free-wheeling sex and modern relationships of the series and more on the pitfalls of a mature relationship. This offered more substance to carry the film from my point of view but unfortunately this was not to be the case here. For too much of the film the material is superficial and sentimental with "love" not ever being all that real and instead smacking of easy steps in the writing that focused on events rather than the characters. Fans may say that the show was never about great depths and, in my limited experience, I agree – it was witty, light and bubbly. The problem is that, the occasional moment aside, the film just isn't that way – understandably perhaps given the narrative demands of the platform and the running time. Problem is, without the witty swiftness of the series, something else is required and this is why the substance was important – and why the film is damaged by the lack of depth on this occasion.

    This doesn't make a bad film but it does severely limit it to being "average" in the main content. What doesn't help at this time of recession (and the film was released during this period) is just how endlessly capitalist the whole thing. The audience needs to care for these characters and that is a little difficult when money is no object for them, retail therapy solves everything and so much dialogue is about expensive items. To top all that, given how easy it is to get product placement into a film about shopping why on earth did we have to have such clumsy and obvious product placement (the iPhone being the worst example). The cast do their usual shtick and all look good and play comfortably with their characters. Some reviews have criticised the four actresses but the material is to blame rather than them. The male cast are mainly just narrative devices and, with the exception of Eigenberg and possibly Noth.

    The Sex and the City film is an average film with lots of problems. Generally this opinion is dismissed if it comes from a male non-fan but I cannot imagine that fans of the series are totally happy with this either. It doesn't manage to capture the spirit of the series but nor does it manage to replace it with anything else of note in regards depth or substance. It is glossy and professional enough to distract but if the plan was to continue the series through the occasional film then this is a pretty poor way to start off.
  • I am a big fan of the show. I am one of those people who have seen every episode at least 4 times, and some of them around 10 times. Even so, I still watch the reruns, and I was really looking forward to the movie.

    So, it is really upsetting that I have to give it such a bad review. I went to see it with the best of intentions. I really wanted to love it. Unfortunately the movie has nothing to do with the wittiness and character of the series. Even putting aside the wooden and/or exaggerated acting, you fail to recognize the characters who where transformed into caricatures, pathetic versions of themselves.

    There were very very few lines that gave a glimpse of the old clever dialog, and they all got lost in a mass of cheesy lines about love and friendship that you even rarely anymore encounter in the corniest of Hollywood's chick flicks, and toiler humor that you only expect from movies like Harold and Kumar. OK, maybe the comparison to Harold and Kumar is a little unfair, but really I had never expected Sex and the City to rely on fart jokes for comic relief.

    People comment that those who rate this movie badly are either men, or just not fans of the show. From my perspective the fans of the show should be the ones most disappointed by the travesty that was this film.

    We grew to love the show because of its honesty towards sexual issues, its shocking but clever dialog, and its characters who, however unreal with their designer obsessions, uncontrollable spending and lack of real jobs, remained true to their personas regarding sex, relationships, commitment, independence.

    The show was about sex. The movie is about love, and treats the subject from the weakest, corniest and most disappointing standpoint.

    This movie is a fake Fendi. Dropping 15 designer names in one sentence, showing bulging men's underpants and orgasming at the sight of huge closets, Sex and the City does not make.

    As for me, I will keep watching the reruns and pretend this movie never happened.
  • TV to film is a tough transition. With TV, you get much more time to develop characters and it relies much more on character interactions and situations to keep the viewer engaged. With film, it tends to be more plot driven and the episodic nature of TV doesn't always go well on a huge screen for some reason.

    Sex and the City's transition from TV to big screen is a little bit bumpy (as expected), but it's not the disaster it could (and maybe should) have been.

    It picks up where the series ended and sex columnist Carrie Bradshaw has finally nabbed her prince charming affectionately named Mr. Big. She finally decides to move into his place and sell her old brownstone as they prepare to get married. Disaster hits during the wedding and the rest of the film could be called "How Carrie Got Her Groove Back."

    Sex and the City is a bit overlong at well over two hours, but the cast is as committed as ever and they do still feel like the people we got to know and love over several seasons of the TV show. There are some good laughs and even some attempts at real drama. Some of these moments work better than others, but it's hard to say that Sex and the City is ever boring. It's lost a bit of its luster during the transition, but if we're being honest, the last few seasons of the show had lost a little of that luster, too.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    It was so awful it defies description. If you are really a "true fan"... you will leave quite bitter and feeling used. The movie literally contains plot lines that revolve around poop and fat jokes. Literally. Poop jokes and fat jokes. Oh, and a petulant 40 year old who responds to being disappointed by/in her partner by cutting him out of her life for a year and looking to her friends to be her mommies. Mature.

    SATC was on my last year in high school through my college years and into my mid-20s. Needless to say, the show meant a lot to me in those formative years. I've since grown up to be a feminist and professional and look back fondly on the revolutionary nature of the series. Even in its moments of fluff and vanity, there were redeeming aspects to the self-reflection and (sometimes reluctant) self-reliance of these women. No, it's not perfect... but it was challenging and eye-opening in its milieu. To then go see this movie is an insult. Much like as I did in my late teens and early-to-mid 20's, I expected a mature movie that examined the lives of these 40-somethings in a way that would offer some insight (and wit) into what I might come to expect in the years to come as I get older, live with my partner, maybe get married, maybe have babies, maybe adopt, maybe leave a partner, maybe face infidelity, etc... something that honored the promise that it was a smart movie that gave these mature women something to sink their acting chops into...

    Instead I got a wedding farce; a humping dog; stock black, Jewish and gay characters that literally made me feel ill; 4 women who don't know themselves any better than they did 4 years ago, 10 years ago; and, oh yeah, POOP JOKES AND FAT JOKES.

    SATC the TV series WAS a cultural icon, a touchstone, a movement.

    SATC the movie promotes itself as a vehicle for creating another socio-cultural rupture. Instead its witless.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Finally a movie that lives up to the hype and defies expectations by taking the familiar, somehow tweaking the formula a little bit, making a very smooth and confident transition into the big screen, and giving us a hell of a great time.

    The film highlights the best of the series: the amazing chemistry and bond that was at the center of the successful TV series, an enterprise that was lucky to have some sharp, funny, and somewhat insightful writing about the way modern men and women handle relationships. Whereas, we would like to think that we adhere to the rules of romance, "Sex" clearly shattered the idea that there was a happily ever after, but it really never turned its back on the concept of hopeless romance, and how we just keep on going regardless of how tough the road can be.

    Carrie proved over and over that getting to the ultimate goal was never easy, as the path is peppered with insecurities and a few unexpected twists and turns. It is impossible to truly understand its logic, whether there is any, and what the gals in the story have given us is the acceptance that sometimes our emotions overrule reason, and this might not be such a bad idea, but it's something that you have to handle very carefully.

    Each member of this quartet bring something to the composite of the perfect women, the delicacy and conservatism of the old fashioned Charlotte, the vibrant sensuality in Samantha, the driven and cerebral Miranda, and the complicated and perceptive about everyone else but herself, Carry. They are kindred spirits and know and understand each other very well. They offer support in times of distress, yet there are times when they can also sabotage each other's happiness, as it occurs in this film.

    In the movie version, the story continues as Big (John) and Carry struggle to reach their long awaited bliss. At the beginning it appears as if is finally there, but things get complicated, and before you know it... everything looks pretty dismal for them, and life also throws a few curves to everyone else because we wouldn't have dilemmas, problems, and an interesting movie otherwise. In the end, we are not really sure if things are going to work out because in the series, not every ending was happy, too. Yet, all of us in the audience hope there is a happy resolution somewhere, and we wait to see if such a thing is possible in our modern contemporary world.

    To make the ride as enjoyable and dazzling as possible, we are given a much clearer and vivid picture of how the world of fashion is an essential part of Carry's universe. She never proclaimed to be perfect and recognizes her defects as her universe is almost perfect at the beginning of the movie. Yet there is a undercurrent of darkness and uncertainty, as we sense that Big might not be able to live up to her expectations. Yet we see their strong bonds, their enduring affection and love for each other as friends and soul mates, and we just know that unless there is divine intervention, these two people are meant for each other. In less epic proportions, we have the personal conflicts of Miranda, Charlotte, and Samantha, who in the film grow up to find much better versions of themselves.

    So be prepared to see a dazzling display of the fashions, the admiration and love of the characters in the film for the grandiosity of a place like New Year, the sense of romance that makes the heart of this film beat stronger than the so called romantic films of the last few years. There is love in the way the production came together, in the way the characters interact with each other, the way the words of an insightful writer can see what really matters to us, as imperfect as we can be.

    The film will disappoint the cynics that are going in looking for its flaws instead of its assets, and the latter are way stronger that any misstep in these fantastic two hours that combine love, friendship, survival, and a reaffirming belief that in the end everything should work out, pretty much the way our hearts hope it will.
  • Let me just start with I love the SATC show, and I like this movie. The show is obviously better than the movie. The movie has a slightly different tone, is more colorful and doesn't have the same great writing as the show. This movie almost seems like it's a short, final season of the show made a few years later than the original seasons wrapped.

    However, there is a lot to enjoy here. It's fun seing the girls back and all the characters. The chemistry between the girls is as strong as ever, and there's plenty of comedy. The story though is quite thin for a movie this long, so after 2h you might be more than ready for it to end. The focus put into fashion compared to the show is a little ridiculous. Fashion was more of a backdrop to the story on the show, while in this movie it's such a big part. They could honestly call it fashion and the city. The times the women are in luxury stores just hanging out and shopping, walk around carrying 5-10 bags from luxury boutiques is insane. The one scene were Samantha walked out of Chanel (I believe it was) in BH with a bunch of men carrying the bags into her already luxury bag filled trunk was just beyond stupid, it looked like it was a campy dream sequence. It's obvious that every designer wanted their clothes, purses and shoes wanted in on the movie, but this was just way too much.

    All that said... it's enjoyable enough to make time go by on a plane or for a girl's night, and it will make you laugh plenty because the actors are still very good and funny, even if the writing is lacking. But I do believe they should have wrapped the saga her, because the ending is the perfect conclusion. The second movie is just BAD and unecessary, and don't even get me started on And Just Like That, or as I call it: Woke And The City.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    My wife watched the TV series. In other words that means I had to watch the TV series. I didn't hate it. A lot of episodes were good, some were bad, the rest were just average.

    This film was an insult to any fan of the show and I'm surprised so many "real fans" were suckered in by it. What happened to the characters? Well, for the most part the couples were needlessly pulled apart merely as a plot device to put them back together again later on in another glaringly obvious saccharine reunion scene. The only story which actually seemed natural was Samantha's, and Charlotte's baby story was a slap in the face to the TV series.

    Also, what was with the clothes? Did the makers intentionally try to make the stars of the show look as ridiculous and old as possible. I'm sorry, but Sarah Jessica Parker has the arms of a 60 year old and they should not be highlighted in any way. The ginger one's (2nd?) haircut did her no favours whatsoever unless she actually wanted to look seventy years old.

    In short, I may only be a bloke so most/all women on here will immediately shrug their shoulders and say I don't know what I'm talking about. However, I do know enough to realise when a show's creator is manipulating and cheating the very audience who helped make him successful.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    *No Spoilers!* It took about 20 minutes for this film to hit its stride...but the wait was worth it! Fans of the non-butchered, original versions of the smash HBO series will be delighted with this film - which seems like an entire new season all wrapped into 2 hours and 15 minutes. Though the first 20 minutes is full of moments with "idiot dialog" (in order to fill in the clueless who aren't aware of certain character dynamics (like who Magda is, etc.)), the pace quickens and the ride is both fun and touching.

    Lots of laughs, lots of tears, lots of good shoes. Bravo! Just what I needed!

    With winks and nods to loyal fans throughout the entire film (cameos, costume pieces, lines of dialog, etc.), the movie almost plays like a love note to its loyal admirers. That said, I think new viewers will be able to jump right in and enjoy the ride. In addition to great performances by all four ladies, Jennifer Hudson is wonderful and fresh as Carrie's personal assistant.

    I saw the film today in an exhibitor screening in Cinci, Ohio (two weeks before its official release...but I'll certainly see it again in a packed theater during opening weekend.

    It was so great to see these old friends again!
  • Warning: Spoilers
    "Sex and the City" is not meant to be a movie. It was a great TV series that I was addicted to...but as a movie,..it felt like a long long alternate ending to the last episode. Basically, the story revolves around Carrie finding love,..her ultimately marrying Big. A lot of the movie was very predictable if you have watched the trailer. There was a lot of scenes that didn't go anywhere which made the movie feel long. I was disappointed that the producers of the film did not take Sex and the City to another level...to make it bigger and better for a feature film. Most of the film was Carrie sulking, a lot of fighting with Miranda, and Charlotte very emotional. I guess Samantha was the most entertaining, very funny and strong as usual. I felt that the acting for the girls were a little too much, except for Samantha. Mr. Big and Steve was good and carried the same characters in the TV series. The extra assistant character for Carrie was not really necessary. I guess the writers did not know how to construct a 30 min TV show to a full length feature. The editing was also not as creative and fast as the TV show. All in all, because it was Sex and the City,..I still liked it,....I just wish it was better.
  • Cute enough for an evening's mindless entertainment, but exactly that and not a penny more. Put aside any thought you might have about not caring a great deal about what happens to a group of rich, superficial white women who (you are told) are actually very smart and talented but who (you are shown) are silly twits (not to use a different vowel) whose exclusive joy in life comes from sex and shopping, and not in that order. I know, I know; we're supposed to believe this is all about love (and the search for same), but it isn't; love is secondary. We're supposed to believe it's about solidarity among a group of women friends and it is, but that's more-or-less an accident. It's really about consuming – clothes, purses, shoes – and other human beings. The introduction of Jennifer Hudson (who tries really hard not to be appalled by the level of minstrel-show tokenism her presence represents) as Carrie's personal assistant is so painful and so blatant an attempt to give a tiny bit of color to the TV series' snow-blinding whiteness that you can't help but be embarrassed for absolutely everyone. Here's another film in which women are stand-ins for what is essentially a gay-male fantasy about women (an art form that George Cukor pioneered in 1939 with _The Women_) Take your brain out and store it in Tupperware for the evening; _Sex and the City_ will make you smile, but not laugh out loud. If you spend a minute thinking about it, though, all it's going to do is make you mad.
  • ...or at least try to be original?

    Saying that "Sex and the City: The Movie" is just for the fans is unnecessary (like it was made for another audience, right?). Who else except die hard fans of the show will be crazy for this movie?

    Is it predictable? Yes. Is it just a longer episode of the TV show? Yes. Is it funny? Depends. If you like the show, you'll laugh; if you don't, you won't. Simple as that.

    It doesn't try or pretend to be art-house material or an Oscar contender (except for the costume design, of course), but it's definitely good entertainment and a pleasant couple of hours with buttery popcorn and a Red Bull. 7/10.
An error has occured. Please try again.