A big part of me wants to believe that somehow Michael Jackson is innocent of all charges, but this documentary is not helping. I expected to see some fairly solid evidence that the allegations made in Leaving Neverland were false. At the very least, I thought there would be enough new information to spark the proverbial "reasonable doubt". I was wrong. The discussion points, as they were presented, could easily be picked apart &, subsequently, discredited. Was that intentional? And if so, then what does that mean? I think it means this effort was pretty weak & thoroughly unconvincing.