User Reviews (3)

Add a Review

  • Summary

    Remarkable film that describes Khrushchev's Russia from the point of view of a French student of Russian literature. A fresco with the youthful effervescence in the incipient thaw that was lived in confrontation with the darker world of the survivors of Stalinism, in a game of contrasts highlighted even by elements of the staging.

    Actually, a Russian look, located far from the schematics of the West.

    Review

    Pierre Duran (Anton Rival) is a French communist student, with a French mother, who went to Moscow in 1957 to undertake a postgraduate course on Russian literature at its University and inquire about the fate and whereabouts of a Russian relative detained during Stalinism.

    Pierre becomes involved with dancer Kira Galkina (Evguenia Obrastzova, a Russian Gina Lollobrigida) and photographer Valeriy Uspenskiy (Evgeniy Tkachuk), members of Russia's incipiently dissident youth scene that begins to experience the thaw of the era of Premier Nikita Khrushchev, whoever succeeded in power none other than Stalin. The "de-Stalinization" that he undertook began to moderately relax certain controls and internal vigilance, while certain semi-clandestine cultural activities and products entered the ambiguous and still dangerous and shifting terrain of the "not allowed, but also not prohibited." Regardless, political dissent (and movements of foreigners) remained closely watched and sanctioned.

    Director Andrey Smirnov proposes an intelligent game of opposites, mainly between generations and, to a lesser extent, between the protagonist's (Euro) communism and the so-called real socialism he encounters, contrasts enhanced by various elements of the staging. The film portrays very well these contrast between this effervescent youth and the members of his parents' generation, with some of whom (including distant relatives) Pierre meets to find out the whereabouts of his Russian relative, detained for political reasons over the years 30. These people, some intellectuals, appear, in general, as sad, defeated and skeptical, constituting an example of how many Russians at that time had the tremendous burden of war and a past of political detainees: a life of survivors . On the other hand, other classes appear that are an active part of the regime or are adapted to it.

    The black and white photography of Andrey Smirnov's film reinforces the scrupulous and immersive reconstruction of the period, giving the scenes starring young people a nouvelle vague air that fades and becomes deeply Russian when the mature characters appear. Highlighting the contrast of styles noted above. In certain scenes (particularly in a particular and correctly meditated one), the fixed plane and the interiors impose a theatrical imprint on them, a dynamic of rest in front of the scenes with young people where movement and, sometimes, exteriors prevail.

    In accordance with the above, it is worth highlighting the marking of the performances, deliberately more naturalistic in the case of mature actors and somewhat more melodramatic in the case of younger ones, starting with the very good performance of Anton Rival, who ends up synthesizing both styles.

    In short, an interesting game of opposites between generations of young and old and between the incipient Eurocommunism and real socialism, from a Russian perspective (that of the director) far from the schematics of the West.
  • The film takes you to the distant 50s of the USSR. It is a very difficult time, both for the older generation, as well as for the young. The story of the older generation surviving camps. The story of a young generation that wants to live without lies. I recommend to view. There is humor, and there is a place for tears, a very emotional movie.
  • This is easily one of the best films of 2020. The story follows a french student of russian origins who in 1957 travels to Moscow apparently for a study exchange, but actually to find a very close relative he never got to know. In the process, all the main forms of oppression exercised by stalinism and by the following regimes is uncovered to the viewer. I have read several headlines comparing this film to Truffaut and the Nouvelle Vague, but I believe this could not be further from the truth. On the opposite, it seems to address that form of leftism that can be perceived in Godard and Truffaut, which seems to ignore how things in Soviet Union really were. This is very emblematic in the first scene, featuring the main character and his leftist militant friends discussing in very naive terms about "degrading bourgeoise attitudes". Later in the film, we witness how this ideology destroyed the lives of millions of people during the harshest stalinist period, and its lasting consequences on the post-war USSR. While it is not the visually most striking modern black and white, its message is still very powerful. The best comparison is maybe with Ida. Much like Pawlikowski's nun, the titular frenchman has a formative experience that uncovers the horrors of totalitarisms.