Add a Review

  • Personally was not the biggest of fans of the previous two 'Christmas in Evergreen' films, which is not going to be popular opinion. They are certainly not terrible, but neither are they great in my view. Hallmark did far worse than the whole 'Christmas in Evergreen' series, but they also did better. While not being that excited over the premise, the cast consisting of some Hallmark regulars have been good in other things and Hallmark have done some surprisingly decent sequels.

    'Christmas in Evergreen: Tidings of Joy' is a decent follow up and of the three films in the series at this point it gets my vote as the best of the three. It is not one of the best Hallmark Christmas films, but it is also far from being one of the worst. 'Christmas in Evergreen: Tidings of Joy' is a pleasant and more than serviceable enough diversion and has a lot to like, providing that you don't expect too much, but it doesn't fit my definition of great.

    It has more good than bad though. The production values are attractive, especially the scenery which is quite picturesque. Some of the soundtrack is pleasantly nostalgic and is less overscored than most Hallmark Christmas films. The Carrie Underwood song was a nice touch. The script once it finds its groove is sweet and light-hearted, it also flows well. The story isn't perfect, but it has a warm heart, doesn't take itself too seriously and has a genuine charm to it. The idea is a great one and it's not wasted or confused (the film could have done more with it though).

    Did feel that generally the characters were worth engaging with and caring about, good to see lead characters that had personality while not having negative traits overdone. Have seen the latter happening a lot recently and it is annoying and alienating when it happens. The acting is better than average, with both leads Maggie Lawson and Paul Greene being likeable (particularly Greene). Good to see the film attempt, and succeed, with continuity by having Ashley Williams and Jill Wagner in supporting roles. Rukiya Bernard has fun with her role without overdoing it.

    However, the film does get off to a somewhat dull and routine start complete with too much forced dialogue. Would have liked more chemistry between the leads, it is there and they look at ease with each at least but it doesn't fully connect or feel fully fleshed out and the same goes with the relationship development.

    While liking enough of the story, it's not flawlessly executed with the final third having too many conveniences and recycled cliches. The ending felt too neat and hasty.

    Overall, not great but decent. 6/10.
  • 6/10 - nice installment in the Hallmark series with a knockout cast
  • This is a Hallmark Christmas movie. do son't expect it to be brilliant or amazing. It is what it is.

    It looks like a Christmas card and it plays like a Christmas card.

    The writer - in spite of what others have said about him here - does a good job with the storyline. In fact, for a second, if you didn't know it was Hallmark, you might think, from the start, that it's a horror movie with a mirthful beginning. Yes, it's that cheerful. You might even wonder, "Is everyone in this town a ghost ?" Catch my drift? Happily, it's a happy film, designed for happy people at a happy time of the year.

    The acting is okay. I mean, you can see the actors acting, but that's what you get for a small budget and a heavily family-oriented holiday thing.

    For my money, however, the only actor of note here is Patty McCormack who plays the part of the librarian or historian or whatever. Patty is a great actress - THE BAD SEED - 1956- greatest performance by a child actor ever - nominated for an Oscar. Remember her? In my opinion, she is the most under-used actress in history, but you can see her old movie star class -- even in this.

    The thing that bugs me is that the writer is accused of making a mistake about the writer of A CHRISTMAS CAROL. In fact, it's included as a "goof" in the summary when there is no goof whatsoever. Allow me to explain.

    In one early scene, a man is reading the Dickens classic to children in a library. Then, when one of the actors walks in on the reading, Patty McCormack's character, referring to the book being read, says, "Not one of my favorite Christmas stories, but it is a crowd-pleaser. Louisa Mae Alcott's is much better."

    That is all she says. Nowhere is it implied that someone other than Charles Dickens wrote the classic novel. A CHRISTMAS CAROL. She simply says that it is not one of HER favorite Christmas STORIES. Some reviewers said that the writer or editor or even the actors should have noticed this goof -- but it is not a goof. Besides that, I know Patty McCormack. I have worked with her. If anyone would have made note of a goof, it would have been Patty. She is a very intelligent woman.

    In conclusion, the movie is okay, but some of the reviews are really uninformed. Did these people listen to the dialogue? Doesn't sound like.

    David Damien Mattia
  • Although this is a generically enjoyable Christmas film, I think it helps if you have seen the two other 'Christmas In Evergreen' films that go before it as a lot of the characters and the situation have already been quite obviously established. They don't effect the storyline as such, but you might come away thinking "Huh? What was that all about when they did that/said that?"

    I'm not sure I would put the two leads together, I didn't really believe their romance. I did however like the idea of a time capsule lost for decades, but the execution was a bit much.

    I like this little town of Evergreen and I can see it making a good TV series, but it would have to be a bit extreme to be maintained for very long, with lots of other wacky ideas like the time capsule.

    It will be interesting to see what the fourth instalment will have in store and whether Ryan and Zoe will ever be there to celebrate again?
  • It's got the small town who loves Christmas. It's got romance. It's got people who don't know what they want to do with their lives. And it's got an unusually high level of ethnic diversity (for Vermont!) This movie's best feature was the time capsule and everything that comes out of it. Worth a watch for this alone!!
  • 6.4 stars.

    As I write this, there are currently 4 installments of the Evergreen movie collection. Evergreen the first was one of the most amazing Hallmark Christmases I've experienced, and the second was above average. The fourth I passed, the ratings are below 6.0, meaning it resides on tainted ground upon which I will not tread.

    In this third installment we are quickly introduced to the supernatural aspects of Evergreen village. On the train the camera angles are reversed and he starts on our right facing forward, then is reversed facing toward the back, a physical impossibility, and likewise is she, shown several times to be sure we understand it's deliberate. The usual cameos of previous Evergreen lead actors happens and I feel kids would totally dig these aspects of the Evergreen films.

    This is my synopsis of an unfortunate theory, that the Evergreen movies lose their sparkle with every succeeding film. Should have ended the franchise after the second, however "Tidings of Joy" does not cast a shadow as much as it is a warning: GO NO FURTHER! Unfortunately, the producers heeded not.

    There is some Christmas wizardry, but there is no magic to be found in "Tidings of Joy". On the other hand, the short 1960's back story evokes nostalgic feelings of old fashioned holidays. Frankly, those few moments of black and white journeys down memory lane were the best parts. In the end, we can see how the producers put a lot of effort into providing an enchanting experience, but this sequel missed the mark.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Okay I was already excited for this movie because of the cast. Paul Greene and Maggie Lawson were so cute together in their previous movie together, My Favorite Wedding on Hallmark. Their chemistry was electric! So I knew I was probably going to like this movie but I ended up LOVING it!! The entire cast is so strong and amazing, stacked with Hallmark favorites! The story revolves around Katie (Lawson) traveling to Evergreen, Vermont to see if what people say about the town is real or too good to be true. Katie meets Ben (Greene) on the Evergreen Express train! Ben lives in Evergreen and agrees to show Katie around town. The story evolves into so much more. The entire town is involved in figuring out a Christmas mystery. Multiple storylines and romances happen throughout the movie but it never feels overcrowded, thanks to great writing! Katie is really an independent woman in this movie which I love. She isn't previously involved in another relationship and really decides to pursue Ben herself. I was so impressed by this theme for Hallmark! If I'm being honest, so far some of the Christmas movies have been a disappointing or me this season. However, this movie was really a hit for me! I was truly never bored which has been happening with a lot of other holiday movies this year unfortunately...Also I'd like to mention that usually I do not care for sequels, this is the third installment in the Evergreen series, but this is the strongest and best of all. There were laughs, great chemistry, emotion and surprises! Sean McNamara is the director on this one and he might be my new favorite. I cannot wait to watch this one again, it's quickly become one of my new Christmas classics!! I truly hope Hallmark continues this story next year and makes a 4th Evergreen movie with Paul and Maggie. Give this one a watch!
  • kauling5 December 2019
    Always enjoy the chemistry between Paul & Maggie, they seem to work well together. However the movie shifted focus between the leads and was directed at other characters in the community of Evergreen. On the surface that's not a bad thing, but you require interesting story lines support the screen time of these folks. My impression was this was a hallmark feel good moment to show case Hallmark cast members we have seen in past productions.
  • mitchellrharl19 November 2020
    This is a beautifully done movie not always a fan of Maggie Lawson but her and Paul Greene real chemistry.love Ashley Williams Barbara Niven cast is great scenery beautiful story line great Thank you Hallmark
  • ami_mq15 December 2019
    Warning: Spoilers
    The timeline doesn't make sense. The time capsule was 50 years ago and built by Carol and Hannah's parents along with others. How was Carol not around during this great snowstorm? She would have been at least a teenager at the time. And how old were Hannah's parents if she's similar in age to Allie? Otherwise it's typical hallmark fluff that passes the time.
  • Remember as a kid or parent of young ones--Christmas felt magical! This is how Evergreen feels! It's just a magical time. Brings all good people together with "comfort and joy" and surprises and love. Paul Greene, I could watch every week! The array of the cast is heart-warming and thoughtful! Merry Christmas in Evergreen! (Yes, I didn't get the reference line, at the end, stating "did you know she also wrote 'A Christmas Carol', referring to Louisa May Alcott. Could someone explain. Still love this presentation!!)
  • jroyals-043411 December 2019
    We had seen Lawson and Greene in a previous movie and they have great chemistry together. However, this movie did not have enough of them and tried but failed to bring in the other characters where the previous two Evergreen movies succeeded. This seemed forced and incredibly hokey. We ended up watching something else since we couldn't get into it.
  • Christmas In Evergreen: Tidings of Joy is such a breath of fresh air this holiday season! In my opinion, it's one of the best Christmas movies this year. From the very beginning, Paul and Maggie have great onscreen chemistry and immediately grabbed my attention. I'm such a fan of Paul Greene and his acting is at its best here! The town of Evergreen is celebrating their 50th Anniversary of their Christmas Festival. But this is more than just your typical movie about a festival, the whole town is working to uncover the lost Christmas time capsule. There were several stories that intertwined together throughout the film. Sometimes this can feel overwhelming in other movies but this worked well in here, I think this is a testament to the great writing. I truly was surprised by how much I like this movie, it's quite different and full of heartwarming surprises. There is such a spectacular cast all around! Paul and Maggie really do such an amazing job leading this movie and work so well with each other! I'd love to see them in more projects together! This film is so special and truly already a Christmas classic!
  • A much less interesting film all in all, not that the preceding two are all that good anyway.

    'Christmas In Evergreen: Tidings of Joy' continues the downward trajectory of this series, with an even more plain and unsatisfying festive story - at least to me, of course. In this 2019 sequel you get not one, not two but three cheesy love stories - all of which are, unfortunately, dull as ditchwater.

    Maggie Lawson (Katie) and Paul Greene (Ben) give the weakest lead performances yet, though at least some sort of continuity continues with Ashley Williams and Jill Wagner reprising their roles - albeit minorly. The plot to this didn't hit me at all, the time capsule idea is solid but didn't mean as much as it could've.

    Three films deep and this made-for-TV series may not have created a good watch, but they are yet to produce an absolutely terrible film - so I guess that's a positive?
  • Thank you Santa! You've given me my Christmas gift early this year with this great movie!! I just watched Christmas in Evergreen: Tidings of Joy. The two main characters were cute together and seemed to have good chemistry. I've noticed in some movies they just throw two people together regardless if it works or not and it can be painful to watch. Paul Greene is so handsome in blue!! I met him this year at Christmas Con, he is genuine and very nice. Really liked this sweet story about everyone coming together. Would recommend. Review: 9/10
  • bonniejeanne10 December 2019
    Loved the chemistry between Lawson and Greene, but this was all too predictable and bad. For those of you upset by the comment made by Lawson's character that Louisa May Alcott wrote "A Christmas Carol," what she should have said was that she rewrote "A Christmas Carol." With a little googling, you would have found out that she wrote a version for children entitled, "A Christmas Dream, and How It Came True." It wouldn't surprise me if "rewrote" was in the script and Lawson just said the line wrong.
  • Magic, beauty, love, joy and warmth! A lovely movie with great story and actors like Paul Greene, Maggie Lawson and Rukiya Bernard!

    Thank you Hallmark <3
  • All the women appear to have been to the Ashley Williams school of acting ! faux grinning/laughing and generally over the top acting. Painful to watch. The worst culprit was Rukiya Bernard who surprisingly, has appeared in many films. Other details were irritating, like why wasn't the 'charger' paid for - was it free ? what happened to the snow globe when glitter was being put into amid a huge cuddle ?
  • Iwatchedthismovie7 December 2019
    The spotlight was on the entire cast and not just the leads! I enjoyed and hoping there's another for us next year!
  • JSGal1 December 2019
    From start to finish this is by far the worst Hallmark Christmas movie I have seen, and there have been some bad ones! Hallmark should have ended the sequels with the second installment. Normally Paul Greene is one of my favorites, but this was not a good fit, period.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Ben upset when he finds her article bashing Evergreen.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This movie was terrible from the disjointed train scene at the beginning to the ice skating on a pond the size of my living room and finding a lost ring in a shop that has been redone a couple of times. The whole time capsule thing was such a weak sub plot and the breaking of the snow globe to reveal a clue was some ham fisted, even Dan Brown would have thought it was too much. 50 years ago, townfolk put a key under a sleigh in a snow globe so that it could be "accidentally" broken? Come on, it's ridiculous.

    I haven't watched any of the other Christmas in Evergreen films. I might need to just to see if they're as bad as this one. I'm a glutton for punishment.
  • mariadedios821 December 2022
    10/10
    I love!
    A 10/10 to the whole series. It was the best of classic Hallmark, which I don't see today. I have no words to describe this beauty, all the stars came together to make this beauty of 3 movies. One better than the last. Bill Abbott knew how to take Hallmark to a good level.

    I always recommend all 3 movies. Those who see it always like it.

    The actors, the settings and the story, everything is perfect for me. Everything was brilliant. The dialogues, the frames, all I would like to have on my wall. The jokes, the romances and the Good Will, everything is wonderful, you feel the magic.

    The films of this Hallmark stage, for me it was not to have the TV on, but to sit and pay attention.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Building size, hidden in the middle of town for 50 years? Enough said.

    But wait, I forgot about the 2 min NINJA mini oven commercial inserted in this film. They need to rename this trilogy dumb, dumber and dumbest. Please, for the love of Christmas movies, find something else for this ensemble to act in.
  • Every google search that you can t think of clearly shows Charles Dickens as the author of "A Christmas Carol " - how horrible of a writer must you be to claim that someone else wrote this timeless classic! And how lazy for the Director to have allowed it to remain in the movie, how asleep-at-the-wheel of the camera person to have filmed such a stupid error, and how awful of an editor for not catching such a blaring obvious mistake. And why didn't the actors know better? Why did they not say the truth at that moment, or are they uneducated as well? If it had been an unknown work or author, it would be forgivable, but this mistake is as bad as saying that Jane Austin wrote Romeo and Juliet! Shockingly stupid, and Hallmark used to stand for quality.
An error has occured. Please try again.