Add a Review

  • Warning: Spoilers
    I had never seen either of the 'Bad Lieutenant' movies and decided I would watch them both starting with the remake. I've actually been meaning to see this movie for a long time now. It's right up my alley. I'm a big fan of Nicolas Cage. I find him extremely watchable in pretty much everything he does. That's no exception here. He gives performances that are hard to imagine anyone else giving anything even remotely similar to. I also loved the concept of this movie. A (supposedly) ultra-violent display of a crooked cop going around doing bad things. Saddle me up. That's my idea of a good time. And it was a good time.

    The movie almost feels a bit like a video game. Kind of like 'Grand Theft Auto' where you dart from location to location and deal with one criminal matter at a time. There's a central case tying everything together, but it is easy to forget that that is there. It also feels like nothing is off the cards. Anything can and will happen at any time. Mind you, the reason I said "supposedly" ultra-violent earlier was because the film wasn't actually as violent overall as I had expected it to be. It didn't take anything away from the film, I just expected a little more in that respect.

    It was great to see Val Kilmer again too, even if he isn't given a lot to do. I miss him from his earlier days. The film has a very strange ending that I'm not entirely sure I (or anyone from what I've read) can fully understand. I suppose it is intended to be left open to interpretation and I'm fine with that. This wasn't the type of movie I expected to have an ending like that though I must say. 'The Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call - New Orleans' is a fun ride that I would recommend people going on.
  • Samiam323 November 2009
    One thing you can always count on when you go into a Werner Herzog movie is that you can always expect to find a story surrounding a very bizarre individual. With Bad Lieutenant, I saw both Herzog and Nicholas Cage in a new light, or rather a new darkness. Labeled as a black comedy, there should be more emphasis on 'black' than on 'comedy'. The film bears a strong resemblance to the thematically surreal and contrived nature of a Coen Brothers film, but the difference is that this one is more character driven than plot driven. More specifically, this is a film that lives on one performance. Nicholas Cage for the first time in a while has done something worthy of recognition, possibly even award worthy.

    He plays New Orleans cop Terence McDonagh, recently promoted to Lieutenant. The film follows his latest homicide investigation. Due to a back problem and a drug addiction he is grumpy and unstable. He is sort of an anti- American hero, and the film concludes on a very bizarre note but clever anti- conventional/Hollywood manner.

    Though not Herzog's best, it is certainly one worth watching. With each film I see from him, past or present he continues to intrigue me, but I think in this case, it might be Nicholas Cage who deserves the most credit.
  • Nic Cage is a living, breathing cartoon character, both as a person and as an actor, and the best filmmakers seem to grasp intuitively that the best way to have Nic in a movie--the only way, really--is to first be sure they've got for him an appropriately comical, ironic, melodramatic or surreal story. This one happens to be all four, to a serious degree. It also features compelling and offbeat relationships and unexpected, wild action, all of it slyly hypnotic and even gripping.

    It'd be fair to describe this film as a tense crime drama that's regularly relieved by comical gags if it weren't for the fact that the perfectly timed humorous beats are so damn hysterical--and so weird. The outrageously absurd, profoundly wacky moments so thoroughly overwhelm the more somber, dark and disturbing moments--not in quantity but in sublime intensity--that they thoroughly dislodge us from any dependable emotional or psychological perch and it's hard to know with any confidence from instant to instant what we're expected to feel or think, which, apparently, is very much intentional. We're being toyed with, and not coyly but blatantly, maybe even wickedly.

    The director, Werner Herzog, is a connoisseur of contradiction and paradox as he's masterfully demonstrated in many of his films, such as the bleakly absurd "Aguirre, the Wrath of God," or the incredibly preposterous "Fitzcarraldo," or the often delightfully campy "Nosferatu the Vampyre" where subtle humor is so effectively collided against genuinely poignant drama. But this one's on a whole different level, and it's entirely the fault of Nic Cage and his nearly demented, turbocharged performance as an increasingly crazed, spiraling out of control, drug addicted crooked cop.

    As his character's condition deteriorates and his affliction and corruption possess him to the core not only does Nic begin to distort his appearance and posture to match his deepening pathology but his voice as well becomes increasingly warped as it grows more high pitched and nasal, as though the mounting stress is compressing him like a squeeze toy. It's beyond silly but it somehow works, at least on the level of his character's distorted, perverted perspective.

    Often the soundtrack is emphatically offbeat, quirky and disruptive, working in counterpoint to the pace and tone of the unfolding action. But the musical score might then quickly shift to more traditional rhythms more in sync with the apparent mood of the scene, which only renders those moments all the more unsettling. It's a very subversive technique inciting a creeping, crawling uncertainty deep within the subconscious, at a primal level; a sincerely surreal experience punctuated so ridiculously, so blatantly by the hallucinogenic appearances of those damn freaky iguanas. So freaky...

    It's disorienting--in the best way--to be so constantly jerked, jolted and yanked around by a movie, especially when it's all being done so well, so confidently. Werner Herzog has crafted a sincerely bizarre, wild ride; a rare and special cinematic experience that will appeal to--and thrill--aficionados of superior, if idiosyncratic storytelling. Very much recommended above all else for its uniquely unorthodox, unhinged vibe.
  • Nicolas Cage - an Oscar winning actor in Werner Herzog's movie "Bad Lieutenant" which has nothing to do with Harvey Keitel's 1992 film, goes absolute crazy in some scenes, but not as furious as he can. These limitations can be for good, to keep movie's tone in check. And there are no reasons to break drama genre and go bizarre into even more comedic and crazier tone. Because comedy is a pretty usual thing in this flick. Cage's character Terence McDonagh is a drug addict, very reactionary, he is frightening at times, because of what he is capable of, but inside he is a good , selfish person, who just seeks a way out. He has this back problem, taking pills, which aren't helping, he basically takes his own medicine ,using cocaine mostly with his prostitute girlfriend Frankie (Eva Mendes). After a group homicide of several immigrants Detective McDonagh is assigned to investigate. This and his personal problems lead this character into an interesting ending. Watching the movie you can't dislike Terence, the direction is really effective to make us care about, at first look, a scum like McDonagh. The plot goes many unexpected ways. Thanks to screenwriter William M. Finkelstein, who definitely wrote an engaging script.

    After loosing the main witness for immigrant's case, McDonagh goes rogue, uniting with the drug-boss, to make some quick money in order to pay debts and save his girlfriend from what she got herself into. That lead to a group of absolutely unexpected events that are not to be estimated anyhow. Nic Cage's character is that chemical element, provoking those events as he becomes a completely different person throughout the film.

    The humor in this film is one special part that I enjoyed the most. Not only McDonagh is a guy who threatens helpless old people, but does it with style, and with script's emotional help by making those old people not only victims but villains in that scene, which is it absolutely funny, because emotionally you expect and want McDonagh to do so.

    There no much action in this film, at some point it becomes a little fantasy of a drug addict. Moments of him, seeing dancing sole and stuff like that makes this movie even more bizarre, but Herzog doesn't overuse scenes like that, so to make this movie a good combination of drama, comedy and addict's fantasy.
  • This movie is filled with humor and turns, it's jazzy and entertaining but not that similar to Abel Ferrara's 1992 story, in spite of the title. It features a wonderful and very much involved performance from Nicholas Cage, a lot of very black humor and gets to develop a strong pessimism. The story is appropriately set in New Orleans (during the Hurricane Katrina's aftermath) and mainly shows what occurs to good people when bad people prosper. Nicholas Cage aside, Val Kilmer doesn't probably manages to do much, but Mendes and Dourif deliver convincing performances. Abel Ferrara's "Bad Lieutenant" was a dirty depiction of a strongly damaged detective (played by Harvey Keitel), where, leaving from the illusions of a drug-induced cop, ended up involving a lot of Catholic guilt. Here there's more action and humor than that stuff, not that the movie is shallow but probably it's just a bit more unpretentious.
  • This film is not at all what I expected from Herzog - I haven't laughed so much in a long time during a movie. What we've got here is an over-the-top, crazy ride with the best Nic Cage in years. Funny little anecdote on the side (as told by the director, Werner Herzog): when Cage asked for advice on how to best approach his role, Herzog told him to go with "evil is bliss". Cage obviously obliged - and the result is hilarious.

    This film got a lot of negativity because apparently, people expected a serious, dark drama (knowing the original, I did, too). Well, Herzog had other plans: this is a wickedly funny black comedy that borders on satire. Fantastic acting by all involved, inventive camera and just one hell of a ride. Herzog's most entertaining film to date and Cage's best performance in ages. 9 stars out of 10.

    Favorite Films: http://www.imdb.com/list/ls054200841/

    Lesser-known Masterpieces: http://www.imdb.com/list/ls070242495/

    Favorite Low-Budget and B-movies: http://www.imdb.com/list/ls054808375/

    Favorite TV-Shows reviewed: http://www.imdb.com/list/ls075552387/
  • Bad Lieutenant, The: Port of Call: New Orleans (2009)

    **** (out of 4)

    When it was announced that Werner Herzog would be remaking Abel Ferrara's 1992 film there was all sort of outrage with fans asking how anyone could remake a film as far "out there" as that. I think most of these complaints were from people who didn't know Herzog because if you did know his work you'd know he wouldn't just simply remake something. As was expected, this version has very little to nothing to do with the 1992 film so people can walk into this expecting something original. The film follows a simple storyline of a Lieutenant (Nicolas Cage) who is investigating the execution deaths of five people, including kids. He begins cracking down on known drug dealers in the area but he's also doing battle with his prostitute girlfriend (Eva Mendes) as well as his drug addiction to cocaine and heroine that is getting bigger by the hour. It's funny but the screenplay to this film probably would have fallen through the cracks had someone like Herzog not been behind the camera. That's not to say this is a bad screenplay but the entire investigation and all the side plots are pretty basic but it's thanks to Herzog's vision and Cage's performance that this film will go down as the wacky, over the top ride that it is. I didn't find the film flawless like some as a good ten minutes could have been cut out of the second act but the film is still very impressive. The important thing to remember going into the film is that you're about to see a very dark comedy so I guess one could call this the greatest comedy ever made about a drug-addict cop. Cage is what makes the movie because his performance here will rank as one of the greatest of his career. I think it has become easy to make fun of Cage and throw cheap insults at him but it's important to remember that when he's on fire he usually can't be touched by anyone and that's certainly the case here. Is he over the top? Sure but he's suppose to be. His performance is so dead on that you can help but look at him and feel that you're really seeing someone going through a major addiction. Cage's entire body seems to change shape throughout the movie as he grows more and more sick. The way Cage laughs at someone being called "G" is just priceless as is a terrific scene between he and an iguana. The supporting cast is very impressive as well with Mendes turning in a fine performance as the drugged out hooker, Val Kilmer as a psycho cop, Fairuza Balk as another cop and the always reliable Brad Dourif as a bookie. Herzog's vision is all over this thing and I really loved the overall look of the movie. I loved how the start of the film has the camera constantly moving, which to me was to imply the state that Cage's character was in with all the drugs. The film is a dark comedy and for the most part both Herzog and Cage go full steam to bring out the laughs and this includes a hilarious sequence with a couple old ladies with one on oxygen and others with Cage seeing things that aren't really there. The terrific cinematography and nice music score also add a great deal as do the worn down streets from the post Katrina days. This certainly isn't among the director's greatest works but it's still something very fresh and original and it really stands out compared to the other type of films being released today.
  • Many will look at this and will think that it is an action thriller about a cop trying to solve the murders of 5 people in New Orleans and that is a basic idea of what the film is about. 'Trying' is right word to use; Nicolas Cage's characters is deeply flawed and is taking drugs to ease his back pain, which he got for saving a prisoner in a flooded prison. He has no interest in bringing the people responsible to justice.

    It is difficult to describe what happens in the film because it is so different from other films that I have seen. If you have seen Werner Herzog's other films then you will like this maybe not as much as some of his other films but there is a lot to like. Nicolas Cage gives a fantastic performance and is clearly back on form after the likes of Next, National Treasure and The Wicker Man. The rest of the cast also do a good job but the focus is on Cage. The chosen location of New Orleans suits the film well and the cinematographer does a good job showing it. The script writer must also be credited for providing the film with interesting pieces of dialogue even though its difficult to tell what was improvised and what was not.

    This film is not for everyone though since the trailer shows it as a more of an crime thriller than a drama. If you are not a fan of art house films or films that have an offbeat sense of humor then you might not enjoy it as much as those who do. Those who watch this film and liked it will be able to find plenty of things about the film that represent something else. There is clearly more to this film than what is happening on the surface.

    If you do choose to watch this film then go in with an open mind as there is a lot to like but I can't guarantee that it will be for everyone.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Sergeant Terence McDonagh is not a great cop but when he rescues a prisoner from a flooded cell in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina he is decorated and promoted to lieutenant. He is also prescribed pain killers to help with a back injury sustained at the time. Six months later he is taking more than prescription drugs. As well as taking various illegal substances he has increasing gambling debts and is in a relationship with a prostitute named Frankie.

    When five illegal immigrants, including children, are murdered in an apparently drug related case he is put in charge of catching those responsible. His methods are definitely unconventional... and sometimes unconstitutional. He also appears to be as keen to get more drugs as to solve the case. Along the way he crosses some very dangerous characters who are a threat to him and those around him.

    I really enjoyed this film; it is delightfully over the top at times. Nicolas Cage is on great form as McDonagh; he gives a manic performance that makes it easy to believe that his characters is on something. He really carries the film. The rest of the cast is solid too; Eva Mendes impresses as Frankie and Fairuza Balk was fun as McDonagh's traffic cop friend despite her relatively short appearance. Director Werner Herzog keeps the story moving at a good pace and while occasionally things get surreal he never lets things tip over the being pretentious... I even liked the lizards! Overall I'd definitely recommend this to fans of cop dramas looking for something very different; it may not be to everybody's taste but it worked for me providing a good central story and more laughs than expected.
  • This was without question one of the worst movies that I have ever witnessed in my life. Our audience was laughing most of the way through. The writing, the acting, the scenes, the story, the editing, even the continuity could not have been worse. How anyone could possibly consider this piece of trash anything resembling a "film" is beyond comprehension.

    I could say many many more things about this movie, but unless it was intentionally a comedy, Nicholas Cage has lost his mind, his limited talent and his taste and should be forever banned from ever starring in another movie. I saw the damn boom in one scene! Awful awful awful!!!!!!!!!
  • This is a great movie that showcases nick cage at his finest. He is a great comedic actor and when the situation is right hits it out of the park!! Unfortunately lately hits severe hit and mostly miss. He takes on 2 many roles to dedicate himself to playing a role better. This movie shows the genre he is perfect at!!! Also great supporting cast as well. As far as comparisons I actually like this version much better than the original.
  • 2009 detective movie. The film of Nicolas Cage, who I was once a big fan of, with his superb acting, which I admire. A police officer jumps into the water from a high place to save a prisoner in a cell during a flood, and his back is injured. He starts using drugs to relieve pain. Over time, drugs, gambling, theft, fraud, match-fixing are involved in every event. Throughout the movie, you want to watch Nicolas Cage's head is a million and not sober up. He lives in a half-truth, half-hallucination. There are some pretty funny scenes. He already laughs when he laughs.

    There are sexual scenes in the movie, but there is no nudity.
  • This nominal remake to Abel Ferrara’s 1992 original isn’t bad, and it’s not really good, either. Nicolas Cage stars as the titular cop who doesn’t so much as bend the law as stomp it flat in his quest to do whatever. Cage isn’t terrible, but even his unhinged charisma isn’t quite edgy enough and feels one dimensional. Even the nihilism of Harvey Keitel’s character in the earlier film had more of a point than this uneven drama.

    Terence McDonagh is a detective in New Orleans. We pick up his story shortly after the landfall of Hurricane Katrina; in an early scene, he and his partner (Val Kilmer) joke about saving or not saving a prisoner in a cell in which the water level has risen past the man’s head. As the criminal desperately treads water, McDonagh takes odds on his survival before the firemen come to rescue him.

    As before, our protagonist is investigating a crime. A family of five has been shot, execution style, in their home. McDonagh must, of course, pull out all the stops to solve the crime and thus get more power and money and keep his prostitute girlfriend (Eva Mendes) in nice clothes and a high-class hotel. He also has a serious drug habit, shaking down clubgoers in exchange for not busting them for whatever it is they didn’t do. McDonagh also has to deal with his father, a recovering alkie, and his father’s girlfriend (Jennifer Coolidge) a current alkie, who live out in the middle of the bayou.

    But where Ferrara’s movie pushed the envelope and strained our sense of good taste, Werner Herzog’s alleged remake seems too straightforward. McDonagh is just another dirty cop who breaks the rules to get what he wants. In the 17 years between films, we’ve all seen countless movies about dirty cops, and Cage’s McDonagh seems no better or worse than any of them. Keitel’s unnamed lieutenant desecrated churches and pranced about in a naked, drunken stupor, but Cage’s cop can’t summon up the cojones to do anything that wild and crazy. Or maybe it’s just that we’re all so numb to outlandish on screen behavior that there’s not much that Cage and Herzog could have done to shock and awe us.

    It’s worth noting that Ferrara, when asked about Herzog’s upcoming film, didn’t have much nice to say about it; Herzog also stated in interviews that he didn’t feel that his movie was a remake of Ferrara’s, despite the title, because he (Herzog) had not seen the original. (Well, you can’t fault that logic, right?) I just didn’t find anything horrible about this movie, nothing that makes me really dislike it. But I also didn’t find it wildly entertaining. It has its adrenaline moments, and the cast tries, but it’s just an ineffective film. It’s fun to see Val Kilmer, though, and Mendes looks great.

    The trouble with this movie is that the connection to the original is tenuous at best; it sort of feels like the Bad Lieutenant part was tacked on in an effort to sell more tickets. Nah, that’s unpossible. Hollywood would never use familiarity to make more money, right? Cage is going to have to do far more of these to pay off his tax bill.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Viewers of the film who think it and/or Cage's acting are simply 'bad' or 'cheesy' are missing the point of what Herzog is doing. Then again, viewers who think it's a wild and crazy artistic take on the crime/noir genre (i.e. the 'it's different/wacky/quirky, therefore it's good' crowd) are also probably missing the point - especially if they think the lizards and dancing soul are 'symbolic' or 'represent' things.

    (Warning - spoilers ahead...) What Herzog seems to be doing is serving up a parody of mainstream cinematic conventions, especially those which verge towards melodrama in their earnest attempts to be 'meaningful', 'emotional', etc. From the opening scene establishing the character as a 'wounded hero' and giving a motivation for his drug addiction with which we can sympathize (Keitel's character in the original had none, as far as I can remember), to the ending where his problems all get resolved in a single scene (!), followed by a flash forward to when his girlfriend is pregnant and his family is back on track, the film serves up one melodramatic movie cliché after another (and skewers them, not through the familiar Mel Brooks/'Scary Movie'-style of parody-through-references, but purely through the ridiculousness of it all and the over-the-top performance from Cage).

    The scenes that aren't clichés (i.e. the soul dancing, the alligator/iguanas, the last shot of the fish tank) work as disruptions from the plot which highlight how ridiculous it is, like the way Bunuel would use a narrative digression to 'take the mickey' out of a melodramatic plot. Nonsensical lines like "Do fish have dreams?" or "I'll kill the three of you (dramatic pause) till the break of dawn", delivered by Cage as if they were poetic, clever or menacing, make fun of both the typical cool 'one-liners' found in action and crime movies and the pseudo-poetic, supposedly 'deep and meaningful' lines found in many 'indie' movies.

    Perhaps the most convincing signs that the film isn't meant to be serious, but is ridiculous on purpose, are the over-the-top acting of the abusive john that Cage kicks out of his girlfriend's hotel room (repeating 'whoa' and pausing to say something like 'oh yeah' to the kid waiting in the hall outside!), which proves it's not just Cage who was told to overact, and the last shot - held for quite a long time on two characters sitting under a fish tank (coming after the aforementioned "Do fish have dreams?" line which makes it seem like it has some sort of 'deep' or symbolic meaning), with Cage cracking up just when we're growing impatient for something to happen, followed by a sudden cut to black. Even the casting of Val Kilmer in the role of an unimportant character who had next to nothing to do and could have been played by anyone seems to have parodic intentions (what has Kilmer done recently?).

    As some reviewers have pointed out, the actual plot, once you remove the stylized direction and acting, is the sort of thing you'd expect to find in a low quality, straight-to-DVD mystery/thriller. Especially when you consider that many of Herzog's earlier films, while definitely being bizarre or 'quirky', weren't cheesy or campy but had definite depth of humanity to them, it really seems like here he's making fun of the generic, conventional material he was given, rather than taking it seriously.

    In a way, it reminded me of "The Room", but done deliberately with a larger budget, more technical polish and with an established star and director who have proved their abilities in the past - all of which make it more likely for viewers to take what they're seeing seriously, instead of seeing through the absurdity of it all. Or perhaps a better comparison would be "Adaptation" (also starring Cage!) which parodies mainstream film-making conventions in a similar way in its final half hour (and there's even an alligator!)
  • Warning: Spoilers
    In the aftermath of the Katrina, in New Orleans, Sergeant Terence McDonagh (Nicolas Cage) has a severe damage in his column rescuing a prisoner in the flooded jail. He becomes addicted in painkillers and cocaine to relief his incurable pain and is promoted to lieutenant. When an African family of smalltime drug dealers and their two children are executed, the abusive Terence is assigned to be in charge of the investigation. He depends on the testimony of a reluctant fifteen year- old boy that had witnessed the crime to open a case against the powerful drug lord Big Fate (Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner); however the teenager escapes from his custody to England and Big Fate is released. The frantic drug and gambler addicted lieutenant seeks illegal means to get drugs for him and for his girlfriend prostitute Frankie Donnenfeld (Eva Mendes) and to pay his increasing debts. Despite the surveillance of the internal affairs, he associates to Big Fate and his gang providing inside information about apprehension and shipment of drugs and living his life on the edge.

    "The Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call - New Orleans" is a different feature of Werner Herzog that seems to be inspired in David Lynch and uses black-humor in an engaging detective story. The visuals of Terence, seeing iguanas and a dancing soul under effect of drugs, are memorable. Nicolas Cage has a magnificent performance in the role of a delusional and mentally unbalanced disturbed detective with unpredictable reactions. Eva Mendes is extremely beautiful and sexy and has also great performance. Val Kilmer has a minor participation in the role of Terence's partner. My vote is seven.

    Title (Brazil): "Vício Frenético" ("Frenetic Addiction")
  • Director Werner Herzog welcomes you to La-La Land once again in his latest film, starring Nicolas Cage as the world's worst cop.

    Whether you love or loathe this film, I bet I can guarantee that you won't think it's ordinary. This is Herzog, after all. As for me, I thought it was decent, but give me Herzog's "Grizzly Man" or "Aguirre: The Wrath of God" any day.

    What those two films have in common is a central figure -- one an actor, one not -- who are far more interesting and watchable than Nicolas Cage. Cage, playing a cop hooked on dope whose entire life is governed by trying to figure out where and how he can get his next fix, plays crazy like no one's business, and crazy certainly fits the film's tone, but I still think Herzog would have been wise to reel him in a little. Cage is so mannered that his acting becomes distracting. He pulls you out of the film instead of into it. Mid-way through, he inexplicably begins speaking in a voice reminiscent of a deranged Jimmy Stewart, and it's all I could focus on.

    The film is staged as one long nightmare; there's a certain morbid fascination at seeing this sleazy guy's life unravel before our very eyes. Then, in the film's final moments, Herzog plays a joke on us that could have gone badly awry but instead works very well, and mimics the feelings one has upon waking from a bad dream. It's all clever and certainly watchable, but I couldn't help but wonder as I left my seat -- what's the point?

    Another unusual film from an endlessly unusual filmmaker.

    Grade: B+
  • I just watched this at London Film Festival & went in expecting to hate it as I loved the original. But I have to say, the film is excellent, certainly Cage's best film & best performance since Leaving Las Vegas. Herzog has done a brilliant job & the film stands on it's own, apart from the Ferrara film. I won't spoil bits by mentioning them, but the film has several stand-out memorable scenes worth the price of admission alone. Herzog has always said that training for making films is 'life' not a stuffy film studies class etc. If you're familiar with his work or sensibilities, you'll get even more insight into how cool this guy is after watching this film. I look fwd to watching it again when it releases and getting the DVD!!
  • loco_7325 November 2009
    Warning: Spoilers
    For me the main character of this movie was New Orleans itself! The great cinematography and the telling shots of a city that is already slowly but surely dying, decayed, abandoned, hopeless, rotten and stale all around, was as powerful as any other element of the movie.

    Actually, the city could be a stand-in for any of the characters in the movie. It's mood, feel and look perfectly reflects those same attributes exhibited by the people inhabiting this sick and ailing universe. By the way I do hope that New Orleans survives this malady, this mal-du-siecle, emerges victorious from this disturbing slumber or coma it seems to have slipped into, and even thrives! Alas we can hope for that much...

    Werner Herzog has a great eye for seemingly the most unimportant details, details which turn out to be the most important and end-up speaking volumes or as much as the presence of any actor on screen.

    No other character is better reflected by this damaged and suffering city than Nicolas Cage, in one of his best performances in recent times. Not since "Lord Of War", have I found Cage to be as captivating and engaging than he was in this role, one that will almost inevitably bring up the memories of his stellar acting in "Leaving Las Vegas". This is a guy falling hard and fast, spiralling out of control, eventually bottoming out, but enjoying his trip along the way, all the way. He is caught in a hopeless vortex, largely of his own making, but also buoyed by external forces and pressures...there is no redemption for him, not where he has landed, but there are glimpses and fragments of humanity and even compassion that exude from him now and then, enough to keep him afloat without being completely claimed by the darkness. Yet even walking that fine line between being damaged and completely destroyed, he is incorrigible and there is no moment of revelation, no eureka, or change for him, there's just the next hit of crack, the next cocaine line, the next bottle, the next pill...

    Eva Mendes, Val Kilmer, Xzibit, Jennifer Coolidge and the rest of the cast do a good job at rounding up the sorry individuals so aptly portrayed in the movie. The score is as weird and appropriate as needed to bring out anything from the movie.

    A special mention should go to the cinematography of the movie, which is quite possibly and deservedly so the "hero" of the movie. This is the power of well realized shots, great camera work and excellent editing. The cinematography brings out the flavour and taste of the places it portrays and makes New Orleans a living, breathing entity, just like its human counterparts!

    Unfortunately this movie has a very, and I mean very limited release, which is too bad, because it surely deserved a much wider audience. Yes, the title is not the most inspired choice, in that it automatically draws out a comparison with Harvey Keitel's "Bad Lieutenant", which in itself is not a necessarily bad thing, simply due to the fact that it might encourage people to seek out that movie and see it once more, people such as myself, who have not seen Keitel and Abel Ferrara's movie and cannot use it as a frame of reference for Cage and Herzog's film.

    I am glad I took a chance on this movie. Personally, I was not disappointed, and in what has been a quite lackluster year for movies, this one was a nice surprise!
  • Werner Herzog's "Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans" is an incredibly unpredictable and bleakly comic work. Despite being very cynical, it is not at all heavy-handed, thus making it both a nerve-wracking and very funny experience. Every single step taken in this film feels like a step in the wrong direction and Nic Cage's unhinged performance truly brings the entire thing together.

    The use of the word "bad" in the title is a severe understatement, as Cage's character is completely out of the territory of conventional evil. Like Abel Ferrara's similarly titled work, the film revolves around a corrupt cop becoming increasingly more desperate to save their situation. However, the antics of the titular cop in this film are darkly amusing, in contrast to the layers of tragedy in the aforementioned film. Like Scorsese's "The Wolf of Wall Street", much of the film's humor comes from excess, as shown by Cage's performance and the strange cinematography from Austrian cinematographer Peter Zeitlinger. The characters in this film are so bad that there is no room left for redemption.

    The style of the film itself is also interesting. Sometimes this film is hard noir, other times is a stoner film, though the film lies in between for the most part. While the plot revolves around the murder, it feels like a large MacGuffin that enables the film to go on many tangents. However, it does not mean the case does not get closure. It just means that you get even more time with stressed-out Nic Cage. Considering that the film is two hours long, I'd say that's more than enough.
  • 7.5/10. I set myself up to not like this, the original with Harvey Keitel had a lasting impression on me when I watched it all those years ago as a student. However, this version only very loosely resembles the original. I think this was a wise move, to try and re-create it would have been a travesty. Instead we get the role reinvented by Nicholas Cage, and it is a quite stunning performance. Totally OTT - the stoop is so bad I keep expecting Cage to launch into Ricarhd III at any moment, the way he refers to one of the drug gang as "G" followed by a snort several times is just comic genius. The scene in the retirement home left me open mouthed - I didn't know whether to laugh or be shocked, one of the most amazing single scenes in a film I've seen for a long, long time. There is comedy in this and it is no where near as dark as the original, in the end I wanted to hate the film, but I loved it!!
  • BAD LIEUTENANT: PORT OF CALL – NEW ORLEANS, started off as a type of cop thriller – based in New Orleans following the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina …

    Nicholas Cage (Raising Arizona, Face Off, Con Air) plays dirty cop Terence McDonagh investigating the murder of an immigrant family who were involved with drugs, his life takes a turn for the worse when injuring his back whilst saving the life of a prisoner – his injuries giving him so much pain that he turns to stealing drugs from criminals to feed his constantly growing habit

    This film lost it's way early on in the story and never recovered in that every time that the tension built up to a climax the director would go off on some zany weird tangent that had nothing to do with the story – trying, but failing to emulate the style of the Coen brothers.

    Ultimately this was a very poorly directed movie that didn't know where it was going or what it was trying to achieve, and a surprising bad film from quite a revered Director Werner Herzog

    Although it should be said that there was such a strong cast and noteworthy performances by Eva Mendes (Frankie Donnenfield) as the love interest, Brad Dourif (Ned Schoenholtz) as a bookie, Jennifer Coolidge (Genevieve) as the Mother and Val Vilmer (Stevie Pruit) as the violent cop – there was really nothing that could save this film.

    With the twists and turns in the plot – this film could have gone in any of ten directions – and I'm pretty sure that any of the other nine directions would have made a better movie.

    The title of the movie suggests that this is one of a series of BAD LIEUTENANT films - Note to self: Don't bother watching any more of this series
  • Warning: Spoilers
    One of Nicolas Cage's best performances. Extremely impressive. Didn't know this movie existed until it showed up on Encore and was it ever worth watching. Herzog and Cage give us a character that I both identified with and hated. The script is brilliant and has no correlation with the earlier movie which starred Harvey Keitel. It is an original which stands on its own. The plot is complex. Cage's character, Seargant Terence McDonagh, is established immediately as capable of heroic acts and is promoted to lieutenant. We learn that McDonagh is not all good guy in stages. First we learn about the drug addictions and later about the gambling addiction. This is one of those movies which will be recognized for its true brilliance about 30 years from now, like Scarface is now.
  • BAD LIEUTENANT, known by most as Abel Ferrara's 1992 film with Harvey Keitel, has got a homonym with Werner Herzog's already forgotten BAD LIEUTENANT - a loose, limber, hilariously weird, and greatly entertaining cop-film with a hysterical (not necessarily funny) Nicolas Cage. The film is greatly set in a beautiful New Orleans slightly before and after the Hurricane Katrina, here rogue detective Terrence McDonagh (Cage) operates under the heavy influence of drugs - drugs he can't shake himself off after an incident that caused him severe back injury. Together with the hooker (Eva Mendes suiting it perfectly) he loves, his life complicates as they descend into both the grizzly underworld of crime, and their own trippy state of mind. Director Herzog stated himself that in contradiction to the 1992-film (which he states he hasn't seen) which themed the burden of guilt, his film is about the bliss of evil. Under the direction of Herzog we're taken on a wry journey to hell where evil takes on the form of deliriously cooked characters and atmosphere, containing a performance by Cage that spans from him wielding a gun at a wheelchair-bound old lady and calling her a cu*t (while shaving!), to him sharing an intimate moment with Frankie (Mendes) in his childhood hideaway recalling memories from when he was a boy, and how he imagined pirates hiding treasures in his home garden. And it's a scene to notice, because Herzog is a master of creating weirdly unique romances, and this one is right up there with the love triangle in Nosferatu (1979). And Herzog is the skipper of a film that oddly makes just about everything work to its benefit - just take a look at the scenes where he rhythmically zooms and cuts with noxious effect on close-ups of iguanas and you'll see what I mean.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    ...so you can laugh at all the things you said "WTF???" about the first time.

    Singing iguanas?

    Break dancing dead Gangsters?

    'Gator Cam?

    Was Cage actually TRYING to make a comedy? Honestly, I understand the guy's house(s) are all in foreclosure, but jeeze...this was worse than "The Wickerman" and I found myself hoping someone would pour bees on his head and burn him up in effigy in THIS one, too.

    Oh, and who could forget the wonderful line:

    "Oh oh oh! You are So gonna be sorry you did this...Oh oh oh oh oh!!!" Someone actually got paid for writing that line? You've got to be joking.

    Quite a bit of fantasy all around--any of the girls that had to actually had to kiss him...they all deserve Academy Award nods. Poor Eva Mendez...she's much too good for this movie.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    "It is the essential I am looking for. What is the deepest essential that defines us as human beings?" - Werner Herzog

    The original "Bad Lieutenant", directed by Abel Ferrara, powerfully acted by Harvey Keitel and featuring a sublime scene in which Keitel crumbles before Christ, was a load of hot air. With its tale of a thoroughly vile cop who lives in a moral cesspit but achieves deliverance through helping some nuns, Ferrara's themes of Catholic redemption were pulled straight out of the Martin Scorsese textbook, with a little Mel Gibson styled self-flagellation thrown in for good measure.

    Those with no use for Catholic angst and pious punching bags should find director Werner Herzog's take on the "Bad Lieutenant" story refreshing. Packed with ridiculous shots of lizards, dancing spirits, goofy gangsters, poetic fish and walking midgets, Herzog has caught those expecting a standard genre flick off guard. But those familiar with Herzog's universe won't be surprised. Herzog's films have always rejected humanocentrism in favour for an absurd, and by extension darkly comic, universe. And so revoking the misdirected energy ("Why aren't you listening, God!?") and exaggerated histrionics of cinema's Gibsons, Ferraras and Scorseses, Herzog instead inserts a landscape of moral and universal chaos. There is no divinity to be addressed, no God to guide Herzog's characters, only malevolence, man one step away from total turmoil.

    And so it's no surprise that Herzog's film is set in New Orleans during the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. Herzog's films often deal with two things: men journeying into and confronting a horrific Nature, and men going crazy with the collapse of their support structures and personal Master Signifiers (God, politics, money, private beliefs, family etc). Here, though, we see the aftermath of these movements. Man has already collided with a kind of cosmic mobocracy and is now pulling himself out of the wreckage. Nature has struck, civilisation has crumbled and so we watch as man begins his slow climb out of the debris, like a lizard clambering its way out of the primordial soup.

    But though Herzog always rejects humanocentrism, we can call him a humanist in the sense that his films often deal with questions of ethics. The end result is, like "Stroszek", not just another flick about a man and a hooker trying to do what's right, but mankind wrestling with questions of autonomy: how to be an autonomous subject in a world that limits self determination? How to hold fast to personal laws and disciplines in a world which is lawless, amoral and irrational? How to serve others when addiction, self-preservation and self-interests are seemingly hardwired into our bones?

    Nicholas Cage, who plays the "Bad Lieutenant" character in Herzog's film, is frequently linked to Christ (standing next to Christ paintings etc), but like most men is both a saviour and a man who needs to be saved. The film opens with Cage diving into water to rescue a man (he will henceforth be linked to fish), an act of altruism which results in him permanently damaging his spine. To combat spinal pains, Cage turns to drugs, but soon develops an addiction. The rest of the film will be populated by characters caught in a strange web of moral chaos. Alcoholics will turn sober, feuding women will become friends, prostitutes will kindly take care of dogs, drug addictions will stem from acts of kindness, traffic cops will help despite getting nothing in return, junkies will turn into saviours etc etc. There are no clear-cut distinctions here, only people caught between a desire to serve themselves and to serve others and people desiring to help others but unable to help themselves.

    The film ends with a moment of spirituality typical of Herzog. "Do you dream of fish?" a burnt-out Cage asks, his line recalling the words of a now dead child whose murderer, the appropriately named Big Fate, Cage obsessively tracks down. "My friend is a fish," the child said, "he live in my room. His fin is a cloud. He see me when I sleep."

    But what Herzog's climax alludes to is the big fish in the cloud, the benevolent God who watches us while we sleep, revealed to be all around us, in the helping hands of the denizens of Louisiana's flooded streets (in early Christianity, the fish symbol is based on the Greek word ichthus, which became a Grecian acronym for "Jesus Christ, Son of God, Saviour"). Despite its irreverence and vulgarity this is thus a very warm film, Herzog's spirit best epitomised by a female traffic cop who helps our hero despite his refusal to give her some hot, drug fuelled sex. You don't scratch my back, but I'll scratch yours anyway. Keitel's Christ would be proud.

    Incidentally, many have stated that Cage's performance compares unfavourably with Keitel's. What Cage's performance does, though, is reveal how silly Ferrara's overly earnest film always was. Cage, in contrast, with his Frankenstein shoulders, hunchback, hilariously large gun and Klaus Kinski haircut, is not only a demented villain right out of a German Expressionist horror film ("The Man Who Laughs"), but offers Cage another chance to indulge in the kind of zany scenery-chewing he adores. Cage's character is always acting, pretending or lying. He acts the part of a cop whilst being a crook, a crook whilst being a cop, straight when high, dedicated when desperate, confident when lost and approaches everyone he encounters with a new face, even fooling we the audience, as we're never quite sure exactly where his loyalties lie. Is he undercover or under-undercover? Is he saved or still stoned?

    Of course it doesn't matter, as Herzog anticipates the continual collapse and rebuilding of his characters, like New Orleans' decimation and subsequent reconstruction. No good deed goes unpunished, Herzog says, but do it anyway.

    8/10 – Worth two viewings.
An error has occured. Please try again.