User Reviews (77)

Add a Review

  • Three other films spring to mind that Broncos reminds me of in the sense that they all bring similar elements; absurdist story structure, over-the-top character-acting, and an unapologetic bevy of immature, toilet-ish, sometimes abstract humor.

    What I can't think of is two people other than me that actually enjoy this kind of film a lot. And I'm guessing you can't either. That's why I think these kinds of films do badly. It breaks down like this;

    • 10%; people who even knew this was coming out - 5%; of those people saw it - 2.5%; of those people liked it - 90% of everybody else doesn't care - 100% of those people who didn't care would probably hate this worse than could possibly be imagined.


    If you disagree and love this film, see box office receipts for, and then watch; Land of the Lost, Freddy Got Fingered, and UHF. Not only are they three excellent movies in a similar vein, but they all bombed beyond oblivion for the same reason.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Gentlemen Broncos is a quirky, offbeat comedy from the same director who brought us 'Napolean Dynamite'. We first meet our protagonist, 'Benjamin Purvis' with his ditsy mother, Judith, sending him off to a two day seminar for aspiring adolescent sci-fi fantasy writers entitled 'The Cletus Fest'. While on the bus going to the festival he befriends two attendees, Lonnie (a gay Mexican-American filmmaker responsible for a multitude of low-budget films and his sidekick Tabatha, an aspiring but hopelessly untalented screenwriter).

    Benjamin has written his own sci-fi fantasy opus entitled "The Yeast Lords: The Bronco Years". He hopes to get advice from Dr. Ronald Chevalier, a once successful fantasy writer, who now has writer's block and has been warned by his publisher to come up with something fresh. Chevalier reminds me of the character 'Roger De Bris' from the original Mel Brooks 1968 'Producers' movie—a pretentious, affected theater director (Jermaine Clement is similarly a hoot as the crazy fantasy author).

    Chevalier is at the Cletus Fest because he needs the money and ends up teaching a workshop on how to create better character names for sci-fi fantasy novels (when Benjamin tells Chevalier he's using 'Bronco' as his main character title, Chevalier feels 'Broncanus' will work much better). Even more outrageous are Chevalier's original book cover illustrations for his 'Cyborg Harpie' series.

    Cheavlier is also one of the judges for a writing competition at the Cletus Fest. Benjamin hands his script in and Chevalier ends up stealing it, simply changing the character names (as he recommends during the earlier 'workshop'). Throughout the film, we are treated to two different (and equally outrageous) film versions of Benjamin's novel. The first 'treatment' is the way Benjamin imagines it: his hero 'Bronco' battles the 'Yeast Lords' (who appear to be a bunch of Cyclops on a barren asteroid) who have stolen Bronco's 'gonads'. After Lonnie offers Benjamin $500 (with a postdated check, one year from now), Lonnie goes ahead and creates his own hack version of 'The Yeast Lords', casting himself along with Benjamin's 'Guardian Angel' who has a penchant for snakes that defecate (the 'Angel' is hired at the behest of Benjamin's mother who feels her son is in need of more friends).

    Meanwhile, Benjamin is trying to help his mother's fashion design business get off the ground. She hears that a wealthy investor, Don Carlos, might be interested in promoting her business; but when she shows up at his mansion, he cavalierly makes it known that if she expects to have him invest in the business, she'll be required to have sex with him. After his advances are met with her screams, the demented millionaire fires a gun at both Benjamin and his mother. They take off in their car and just escape being shot.

    Things go from bad to worse for Benjamin when Lonnie convinces him to star in Tabatha's new film. At the film's premiere, Benjamin realizes that Lonnie has made him look like an idiot and that Tabatha's film is horrible; he runs out of the theater and throws up. In an over the top scene, Tabatha runs out of the theater too and expresses her love for Benjamin by kissing him, even though his vomit still covers part of his face. Benjamin eventually discovers Cheavlier's plagiarized version of his book (now entitled 'Brutus and Balzaak') on a display rack in a bookstore and later attacks the dastardly fantasy author at a book signing. All seems lost when Benjamin is arrested and thrown in jail. His Mom saves the day when she reveals that she's registered all of Benjamin's books with the Writer's Guild ever since he began writing. Now that Benjamin can prove he holds the copyright to his work, all of Chevalier's books are destroyed and Benjamin becomes successful enough to finance his mother's first fashion show.

    On the plus side, the film's creator, Jared Hess, has showed improvement in his screen writing abilities in that his current protagonist (Benjamin) is actually warm and likable as opposed to the unlikeable Napolean Dynamite. What's more, Hess tells a story here that is not only imaginative but holds your interest from beginning to end. Jermaine Clement gives a strong satirical performance mocking the world of sci-fi fantasy writers and their misguided adolescent fans.

    On the down side, those 'film versions' of the 'The Yeast Lords', get kind of repetitious and you could say that the joke wears thin. While Cheavlier and to a lesser extent, Lonnie, are amusing characters, I found the two female principals, Judith and Tabatha, too clownish to be taken too seriously (despite Judith coming through for Benjamin in the end). Hess seems conflicted as to his feelings toward women in general-while his portrayal of the two women can be viewed as an 'affectionate send-up', at the same time he ridicules them (he wants us to laugh at both of them for their lack of talent—in Judith's case, it's her ridiculous fashion designs and in the case of Tabatha, her incredible pretentiousness as a screenwriter).

    Gentlemen Broncos will not win any awards as the next Citizen Kane. But as an occasionally amusing, offbeat satire of the little known world of sci-fi fantasy writing, it's worth at least one look.
  • I'm going to keep this one short and simple.

    Gentleman Broncos is the 3rd feature film written and directed by Jared Hess. Gentleman Broncos follows awkward sci-fi loving Benjamin as he tries to have his story, Yeast Lords, made into a "movie." But after going to a sci-fi camp and meeting his favorite sci-fi author, Chevalier played by Jemaine from Flight of the Concords, he steals Benjamin's idea and makes the book himself.

    Now, first things first, unlike another That Was Junk writer, I like Napoleon Dynamite and I don't think it's the worst movie I've ever seen. I love it in fact; movies about awkward, weird people out of place people make me smile. And that's what this movie felt like. It's basically Napoleon Dynamite 2. The main character, Benjamin played by Micheal Angorano, isn't necessarily as weird as Napoleon Dynamite but everyone else around him is such as his mother, played by lovely Jennifer Coolidge who sells tacky clothing and giant balls of popcorn, is.

    Everything and everyone is weird in this movie. And everyone is fitted in retroesque clothing and sporting bad haircuts. There is a lot of silly dialog and snappy one-liners that would make any teenager crack-up. Watching at 5 in the morning had me laughing, but honestly the lack of sleep could have been a factor. It's quite obvious Jared Hess has an odd and unique way of making movies. Even if one hates the dialog, I don't think anyone could deny that he is a great director. And cinematographer Munn Powell, also DP on Napoleon Dynamite, has a way of making Hess' movies look dated. Hess loves awkward, deformed, and over the top character. Héctor Jiménez, of Nacho Libre fame plays over-smiling and flamboyant Lonnie. Sam Rockwell plays the rough and tough Bronco and the flouncy Brutus. And Mike White plays the Jennifer Coolidge's slow husband. I loved all these characters because they were silly. I can most definitely guarantee that one of the big reasons this movie has a 5.4 on IMDb is because people hate the characters. They make you feel uncomfortable and have you asking "why are they doing that?" Their dialog, movements and just everything about them is completely unnecessary. So why do I love them, because everything about them is so unnecessary. It's like passing through a small town when you're coming from your big city home. Everything is surreal and you feel like you've stepped into another world. The Clothes are old fashion and the people are completely clueless. I love people and movies like that personally. I love movies that don't take their characters too seriously and can make them silly. It's the reason why I watch movies like G-Force from time to time.

    If Napoleon Dynamite made you want to pull your eyeballs out then stay for from this movie, you won't like it.

    ThatWasJunk.blogspot.com
  • "Gentlemen Broncos" is so off-the-charts weird at times that you often can't tell whether it's breaking new ground as a brilliantly original and creative work - or just trying too hard.

    Michael Angarano ("Forbidden Kingdom") plays Benjamin Pervis, a friendless teen who lives with his penniless mom in a geodesic-domed house in rural Utah. Ben is a writer of sci-fi fantasy fiction who has one of his stories stolen by Ronald Chevalier (the delightful Jemaine Clement), a world-famous author with a James Mason voice. Ben also runs into a couple of bizarre indie-film makers who want to make the same story Chevalier stole from him (entitled "Yeast Lords" from the series "Gentlemen Broncos") into one of their shoestring-budget productions.

    It's hard to know whether writers Jared and Jerusha Hess (Jared also directed the film) have any real affection for their characters and the world they inhabit or whether they view them merely as objects of out-and-out mockery and ridicule. In fact, the characters, with their mouth-breathing, slack-jawed expressions and atonal line readings, achieve near-freak show status at times. It's this air of condescension, rather than the tale itself, that sometimes makes it hard for us to laugh at what's happening on screen.

    Despite this discomfort, however, there is still much to admire in the work. The movie has fun parodying both the unscrupulous nature of the publishing business and the accoutrements of low-budget filmmaking. Clement is marvelously deadpan as the sci-fi penner whose writer's-block forces him to scrap all traces of authorial integrity in pursuit of the almighty buck. And Angarano creates in Benjamin a character we can actually care about and root for. The enactments of scenes from Benjamin's novels are appropriately hokey and cheesy, and the movie also makes astute musical choices, particularly Zager and Evans' 1969 hit "In the Year 2525," which effectively book-ends the story.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Like a lot of folk, I enjoyed Napoleon Dynamite. I found it funny, charmingly quirky with a sense of heart. So I looked forward to Nacho Libre, Hess' follow up, which starred Jack Black as a priest moonlighting as a masked wrestler. From the guy that brought us Napoleon Dynamite, how could he go wrong with that concept? Well, if you saw Nacho Libre, you know how he did. And it's the same with Gentlemen Broncos, another good concept, fledgling writer has his cheesy sci-fi novel stolen by a veteran writer, that is totally fumbled by Hess. Methinks Napoleon worked more through the strength of the cast and Hess's own inexperience. But the more experienced he gets, the worse his films get. GB doesn't have a bad cast, all are talented performers, but you might have to see them in other pictures to realize that. Hector Jimenez in particular, is just too quirky for his own good. A lot of the characters are, too the point that they're caricatures, and it's hard to care about caricatures. Like Nacho Libre, Hess likes parading unusual looking extras in front of the cameras, but instead of us feeling for them, it's like he's the barker at a freak show just pointing out, "Hey man, lookit this one, boy he's weiiiird!" That sense of heart I enjoyed so much in Napoleon Dynamite is definitely missing. As a fan of those trashy sci-fi novels that made up the title sequence, and obviously served as inspiration for this movie, there are homages present in GB that I liked. Yeast Farms, clone armies, robo-stags not as unusual as you might think. Jemaine Clement and Sam Rockwell are both very funny in their roles, but seeing as how Jemaine Clement IS the antagonist, it's sort of a shame he isn't used more. There's a lot of stuff that should have been cut, and in the hands of a better director a really cool concept wouldn't have gone to waste. Maybe someone can plagiarize it and realize the potential that Hess has wasted once again.
  • I get that it might not be everyone's cup of tea but my wife and I found it laugh out loud funny!
  • When Benjamin (an aspiring young science fiction author) attends a writers' workshop, his latest work is quickly lifted and re-imagined by two of his fellow campers. One, an obnoxious small-scale filmmaker, does so with the creator's blessing while the other, an established novelist, claims the work as his own. Written and directed by Jared Hess, also responsible for Napoleon Dynamite and Nacho Libre, this eccentric comedy lands somewhere in between the hypnotic success of the former and the disappointing shortfalls of the latter. The opening act is a real riot, with quirky, colorful characters stepping out of the wallpaper and amazing over- the-top visualizations of Benjamin's work that treat his hokey material with unmasked deference. But while those big screen interpretations of his hilariously awful novel bring the goods throughout the film (with competing visions from the two other writers' interpretations raising the bar) the primary storyline doesn't keep pace. The awkward, passionately inept cast doesn't quite have the charms of Napoleon or Pedro, (with the exception of Jermaine Clement of Flight of the Conchords, who's outstanding as selfish sci-fi plagiarist Ronald Chevalier) and there's a notable lack of a top-of-the-mountain moment that was so present in Dynamite's dance scene. It's a spiritual successor that had potential, but never completely rises to the moment.
  • moviemanMA11 June 2010
    2/10
    Yikes
    Warning: Spoilers
    Gentlemen Broncos tells the story of Benjamin (Michael Angarano), a teenage, homeschooled boy who aspires to become a published science fiction writer. He attends a writers camp where he meets Chevalier (Clement), Benjamin's favorite sci/fi writer. It is at this camp that Benjamin is given the opportunity to have his work finally published in a writer contest to be judged by Chevalier himself. Reluctant to have his work read at first, Benjamin is convinced by others on the trip to do it.

    Meanwhile, Chevalier is having trouble of his own. His latest work has been rejected by his publishers. He is on the brink of losing his publisher if he doesn't produce better material. Desperate to further his career, Chevalier turns to one of the contest entries. After reading just a few pages of Benjamin's story, he does the unthinkable and steals it and turns it into his own.

    Benjamin is unaware of the actions taken by his idol, and after the camp he returns home to his mother (Jennifer Coolidge) who has signed up Benjamin in a sort of "big brother" program. Benjamin's guardian is Dusty (Mike White), a curly haired throwback to the 80s whose hobbies include snakes, blow darts, and checking out Benjamin's mother.

    I think I'm going to stop going into the later plot points of the film. Just a few quick notes, Benjamin tries to get his book turned into a low budget movie by some of his writers camp buddies, he tries to help out his mom, a struggling a fashion designer, and we see more of Chevalier and Benjamin going back and forth with the book after it is released. Oh, and there are some reenactments from the book, both from Benjamin's perspective and from Chevalier. Sam Rockwell plays the main character, Bronco, in both.

    This film just fell flat on its face in my opinion. There are several aspects that are just glaringly wrong. For instance, the main character of Benjamin is so bland, uninteresting, and serves only one purpose of writing the story. He does virtually nothing through the entire film. He is shy, introverted, and just lets whatever happen. It is only when he finds out Chevalier has plagiarized his work that he shows some emotion. In both Napoleon Dynamite and Nacho Libre, the main character is quirky, unique, and entertaining. Here we do have a very interesting character in Chevalier, but he plays a lesser character.

    Another flaw lies within the other secondary characters surrounding Benjamin. The two other teens that he hangs with are Tabatha and Lonnie. They are annoying, mean, and odd to the point of being uncomfortable. Lonnie's facial expressions are so bizarre, unnecessary, and plain hard to look at that I immediately disliked the character. Tabatha, who looks more normal, is unpleasant and has very little emotion, and when she does it is very forced. These characters are so unlikable that is made me dislike Benjamin for putting up with them. It's okay for Chevalier to be mean, because he is the villain, if he can be called that. These two are just weird and not good for the film.

    The scenes from the science fiction story about Bronco start off strange, but I didn't mind. Then things just go over the top and it's hard to stay focused. I thought they could have added so much more to the story but they didn't work for me. I love Sam Rockwell, but these scenes were weak, unorganized, and too weird for my taste. I know the story is supposed to be weird, but it was unnecessary.

    The story could be used for a much better film, but the execution is horrendous. The writing is flat and isn't really funny. This movie is supposed to be a comedy. What we have here is a major flop. It doesn't succeed in the areas it needed to. What concerns me most is how much of a fall Hess has taken. His films are getting more and more out there. I am not opposed to strange cinema, but it has to have a point. There is nothing learned here. Maybe that homeschooling produces strange kids, science fiction writers are also strange, and that the Midwest is, well, strange. Avoid this film if you can.
  • You will know within 2 minutes of watching this if you can watch all of it or not - it is anti-Hollywood, just about anti-indie, a brilliant take on boredom, eccentricity, makes unoriginality into hyper-originality and is generally like a 1930s freak show with a side order of banal.

    Seriously weird, and yet oddly familiar, the psychodramas and models of parenting and the wakwardness of friendships are all twisted in a maelstrom of ideas that just keep on coming. Every character is explored not for character but for something odd, find the oddness, in the face, the mannerisms etc; and its in their eccentricities that you find the story.

    However, behind all of the strangeness, there is consummate skill: the actors are all just on the line between satire and buffoonery and it all works brilliantly. This is a truly strange, odd, little film with Sci-Fi roots and strange strange buds.

    All I can say is plunge in - it is one of the stranger films out there - yet it has heart and humor, and many will recognize the nerdcore COS world it inhabits all too well - if off the wall is your cup of tea you can rest assured you have found the right stop...weirdly brilliant....
  • Gentlemen Broncos may have been made in 2009, but it does an outstanding job placing the story and imagery in the late 70's.

    You'll enjoy Gentlemen Broncos more if you relax and keep in mind that in the 70's CGI probably wasn't even a glimmer in someone's mind. Thus the final movie "Yeast Lords" is a wonderfully creative, absurd and eccentric tour of what was possible at the time. And yes, they would have had fun making the movie.

    Michael Angarano does his usual outstanding job, while Jennifer Coolidge is great and Mike White, who does a great job, reminds us of Michael McKean's long flowing hair in "This Is Spinal Tap".

    Along with a fun and pleasant story, we are treated to many great songs by artists such as Zagar and Evans "In The Year 2525", Kansas "Carry On Wayward Son", Cher "Just Like Jesse James", Black Sabbath "Paranoid" and many more. The songs are a treat by themselves.
  • maura-marie29 October 2009
    There's a prophetic line hidden in Jared Hess's new film, "Gentleman Broncos," which opens in limited release this Friday:

    "People hated your movie," says a main character, "some of them walked out."

    I had the painful experience of watching Gentleman Broncos at a DC screening on Tuesday. Gentleman Broncos is a 90 minute march of superficial characters, and endless, sophomoric jokes that don't further the plot or serve any purpose. There is very little of merit in this film to hold on to. Much (way, way, too much) of the film is spent in the god-awful story-within-a-story fantasy world of "Yeast Lords," which is a barrage of sophomoric jokes and gross-out humor. Attempting the whole, "it's so bad it's funny!" thing-- but it's so over the top and charmless that it wears quickly and doesn't pull of the "funny" part. Snakes pooping on people and plots based on gonads being stolen is not an example of satirical comedic genius. It's the work of a lazy writer crossing their fingers, hoping someone might laugh.

    I'll give this movie one star, because it only had one: Jemaine Clement was undoubedly the shining light of this film. Clement is undyingly charismatic on screen, and turns even this weak script into something worth listening to. However, with the serious and underlying issues that riddled the rest of this film, there's no way Jemaine Clement could have saved the show on his own- he's just what kept me from leaving the theater.

    The commenter below me compares this film to Wes Anderson, Scorsese, and the Coen Bros-- they must be a close personal friend of Jared Hess, or a PR agent for Fox Searchlight, or maybe we saw different movies. The film that I saw had very little in it to hold on to. As a whole, Gentleman Broncos is charmless and unsatisfying. Avoid, avoid, avoid.
  • For some reason I managed to miss the reviews for Jared Hess' "Gentlemen Broncos" when it first opened in limited release. I saw the trailer for it some time ago, and was excited for it; "Napoleon Dynamite" and even Hess' follow-up "Nacho Libre" were two of the most off-kilter, refreshing comedies I've seen in the past decade. "Broncos" is absolutely no exception, expanding on and arguably perfecting the "geekverse" that Hess started with "Napoleon." This third film in the "Crayola Trilogy" may be so well designed for sci-fi geeks and lovers of Hess' first two movies, that it simply had no way to possibly survive in the mainstream market.

    Me? I loved it. Not seeing any reviews beforehand, I was expecting a film that hit the same high notes of "Napoleon," and for me, I got them. I am also a sci-fi nut, and I like my comedies full of bizarre and strangely real people- this, Hess excels in, as well. I went to bed last night rating it a "10" on IMDb; I was shocked to see the rating at a mere "5.5/ 10." Flip over to Rotten Tomatoes; it's a "Rotten" at 16%. I also find it worth noting that neither of Hess' previous releases have been treated on IMDb much better--- I seem to remember a time when "ND" was in the Top 250, or at the very least had a much higher rating than it does today (6.9). I recall "ND" being hailed as a cult classic, only to see its popularity seemingly cripple later opinions of the film (regardless of the fact it started very small).

    Anyway. I'm just saying I think Jared Hess' work has been roundly ignored for being truly great cinema. I can see why "Gentlemen Broncos" has not enjoyed the success of "ND"--- it is a truly far-out film, that only "nuts" such as myself are likely to enjoy; I spent my youth much like the lead character writing short stories and dreaming up far-off worlds--- for kids like that, and their adult counterparts, I can only say "See This Film." You won't regret it.
  • I watched this with my 10 and 6 year old boys and we laughed the whole time. It's a ridiculous movie, with crazy, interesting and incredibly funny characters. Jennifer Coolidge is brilliant, as usual. Benjamin, the main character, is believable as a thoughtful, possibly gifted outsider amongst crazies. There are lots of fun shifts between the main plot line and Benjamin's created one, the story that was stolen. His story is shown via perfectly bad sci-fi movie scenes, complete with dialogue believably written by a teenage boy. We loved it - happened upon it and were glad we did. I saw a negative review for the movie and will say I thought it was MUCH funnier and better than Napolean Dynamite.
  • Jeff-1234 March 2010
    Warning: Spoilers
    * Gratuitous, unexplained gross-outs. * Non-charismatic schlub of a protagonist who does nothing -- all the action comes to him. He suffers one indignity after another until finally he cracks. Then it all works out. * Not effective as a satire on science fiction, authors, workshops -- not to mention families, movies, or human beings. * Just not funny, except sometimes Jemaine.

    I feel like the Hesses are now "trying" to be "quirky" "just like in Napoleon Dynamite" (as I'm sure they hear over and over again in pitch meetings). This has many similar features and beats, but none of the charm. They've lost it. They need to start writing new things and explore the big wide universe outside of their own minds.

    Real disappointment.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Thus far, all of Jared Hess' films have been about likable weirdo losers who become likable weirdo heroes with a little help from their likable weirdo friends. "Gentlemen Broncos", which sees Michael Angarano playing an awkward teenage sci-fi writer whose work is plagiarised by an arrogant celebrity author, is no different.

    Many of Hess' films take place in a world which seems to be a hybrid of the 1980s and the 21st century. But "Gentlemen Broncos" is also evoking another subculture: a distinctly 1970s brand of psychedelic, mind-bending science fiction literature, mixed with what looks like early 1950s Weird Tales art. For this reason, "Gentlemen Broncos" will appeal mostly to die-hard sci-fi nuts. The kind of people who understand that sci-fi once meant weed smoking, P. K. Dick reading hippie delinquents rather than affluent internet nerds with "Star Wars" toys.

    With its intentionally cheap special effects, kitschy style, deadpan idiocy and a number of fantasy sequences starring the brilliant Sam Rockwell as a Yeast Lord who rides a hover reindeer with a machine gun up its anus and rocket launchers strapped to its chest – I'm not making this up – the film captures that crazy moment when hard science fiction died, becoming the watered down demon we now associate sci-fi with today.

    If you've seen "Napoleon Dynamite" you know the drill. The film is a comedy with a small joke quota, but a consistently retarded tone. It works, but Hess' loving assembly of misfits and oddballs aren't as interesting this time around, and his attempts at being heart-warming and uplifting feel schematic and predictable. If "Napoleon Dynamite's" victory ending worked, it's only because the film was self-consciously tapping into your typical teen movie finale. In contrast, "Gentlemen Broncos'" ending is just lazy.

    8/10 – You've got to be a weed smoking P. K. Dick fan with a oddball sense of humour to like this. Rockwell, as always, is a blast.

    Worth one viewing.
  • psycho-adam16 January 2011
    this unknown little indie film is a strange delight, i managed to catch it on TV recently and i was amazingly surprised. its premise did sound like a rip off of big fat liar, but its content was filled with a sparkling amount of originality. the cast wonderfully carry the story of original creations being destroyed which i believe to be a stab at all the films which may have been based on great source material but destroyed by the stupid minds the carry on to own them. the best part has to be the performance from Jermaine clement as a snooty and up his own anus sci-fi writer. an excellent treat for any hunters out there. i would highly recommend this film to any one who enjoys cringe humour that is made to make you feel uncomfortable.
  • Oh man. This is Utah through and through. If you grew up Mormon, or around Mormons, especially in the Utah area, you will get this humor. Otherwise you will just wonder what the heck is going on. I'm not Mormon, but I'm a native of Salt Lake City, and I GET IT. I'm very glad someone lets the Harrises make movies. because I love them. Thanks Jared & Jerusha.

    Jermaine holds this film together, however, I recognize so many of the characters from earlier phases of my life.. My Gosh!

    I've partied with Rod Decker btw.

    I miss Pedro.
  • Gentlemen broncos is one of those predictable, run-of-the-mill stories you always see about intergalactic yeast Lords, gonad napping, rocket propelled attack stags, blow gun darts dipped in dog poop, Cyclops henchmen, vomit-flecked first kisses and python poop. Why can't Hollywood ever come up with anything original? And why can't there be a sarcasm font?

    This movie is pure, exuberant mayhem. It taps into the bizarre, probably drug-fueled science fiction work of the 70s and 80s with their crazy covers and prog-rock inspired plots, and maintains two stories within a story, complete with dueling movies. Along the way, it examines young love, life in a really small town, home schooling, the creative process, pompous authors and more.

    I saw a clip of it in The New Yorker iPad app and was hooked. Jennifer Coolidge is amazing, and so is the lead, Michael Angarano. There's no way around it, Gentlemen Broncos is a bizarre and crazed movie, but well worth watching. If you disagree, you can, in the words of Bronco, "eat the corn out of my crap."

    -- www.cowboyandvampire.com --
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I wanted SOO badly for this movie to succeed. I am a HUGE fan of Napoleon Dynamite and Nacho Libre, and will watch the films over and over again. Jared and Jerusha Hess are excellent writers, and I love their quirky characters and the colorful worlds these characters live in.

    But this film just does NOT work! Any film that has gratuitous use of vomiting is destined for the trash heap, and this film has so much of it that you are scratching your head about how on earth it was every approved for release. It makes sense it was pulled from the theaters after just a couple weeks.

    Here is a great example of the stuff that is so awful you can't even believe you're watching it: Benjamin is in a movie theater an gets sick to his stomach seeing the trash on the screen that his book has become and goes to throw up in the lobby. Then Tabatha comes out into the lobby to profess her love for him and kisses him immediately after he vomits, before he's had any chance to clean up or anything. DISGUSTING!!! Ronald Chevalier is hilarious. A completely arrogant buffoon that Jemaine Clement pulls off wonderfully. The bluetooth headset he always has on but never uses. The crazy Native American accents to all his outfits. Hilarious.
  • So, I completely understand why people do not like this movie. It can be gross, confusing, and just plain stupid at times. With that said, it is one of the funniest movies I have ever seen. Jemaine Clement and Sam Rockwell fell into the roles of some of the funniest characters I have ever seen. There are some lines when both in and out of context made me laugh so hard I cried.

    This movie is not for everyone, I think people who like both napoleon Dynamite and Nacho Libre will find some enjoyment out of this(which I don't). More importantly, I think people looking for some sci-fi fantasy literature satire will get a kick out of this, because both the dialog with the "Authors" and all the excerpts from the two books had my laughing out loud constantly.
  • But defintely worth a watch for it's originality and comedy.
  • mail-104525 September 2009
    I just saw this last night, and I'd say you were being kind. The jokes, such as they were, had nothing to do with the film or the story. They could have been lifted from this movie and dropped into any other, it didn't matter. But that doesn't matter because the jokes were slow, contrived eyesores worthy of Telemundo circa 1980.

    Jared Hess seems to have played out all of his ideas: 1: Funny-looking people are funny 2: Ugly people are funnier 3: Let's make fun of people's dreams and aspirations 4: Let's add some phony morality so we don't come off mean.\

    Ugh.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This is an alt very indie feel movie, with extreme silliness as it's major plot line.

    The movie pokes gentle fun at pulp sci fi authors and books, with lots of hilarious scenes having the actors depict characters in the main sci fi stories.

    The Space Harpie Vixen Women, with laser-shooting tits, are probably the best, and a close second would be the jet powered stuffed deer stag mounts.

    I say those things so you have an idea where this movie is going.

    If you read the above and said, "Oh well, Space Harpie Vixens with laser titties, well that's just SILLY! HARRUMMMPHHH!!!!" then this is not the movie for you.

    If, however, you find yourself wondering,

    "Space Vixen Harpie Women with laser breasts.... hmmmmm, intriguing, one wonders, how do these Space-Going Amazons possibly breast feed their gentle young?" Then THIS is the movie for you, for THEY ANSWER THAT in the movie.

    This is NOT a movie like Battlefield Earth. That movie was a total flying cowpie disaster engineered by a nutball LRon Hubbard. This movie is poking fun at itself, it does NOT take itself seriously, as B.E. did, being the holy secret of the Scientology religion and all I guess it had to... no this movie is poking fun of horrendously bad sci fi authors LIKE LRon Hubbard.

    The acting is so incredibly bad it is BRILLIANT and Oscar WORTHY. The sets are so impossibly poorly made THEY ARE INCREDULOUS. The special effects are so ineptly cringe-worthy THEY ARE STUPENDOUS.

    YOU MUST SEE THIS MOVIE. The fate of the Yeast Slaves Depends on it!
  • thirdsqurl31 December 2010
    This movie is so bad that its actually good in a weird sort of way. It's a technically solid film,keeps the viewer's interest, and combines well with the soundtrack. Like Napoleon Dynamite, it has a quirky style that takes some getting used to. Several times the movie was dumb enough that I couldn't believe they found the financing for it, yet I still laughed. As a fan of old movies, I found it better than Plan 9 From Outer Space and most of the "deliberately bad" films that have followed the genre. The best elements of the film are the steady performances by the lead actors, a despicable villain, and a coherent plot. The bad special effects are really bad but funny if you're in the mood to be silly.
  • my little brother could've done better movie than this, completely non sense... not B grade move, not C grade move not even D... i'd call this a F movie, F for Fail. I started watching the movie and right on the first 10 minutes i noticed it was going to be a bad movie... should have listen to my intuition, turned out to be a lot worst than i imagine, i'm glad that i didn't pay for this, it was showing on TV, but i was amused how a pay TV channel would subject their viewer for some dodgy movie like this, specially on the premium movies channel.

    So if it's raining outside, you have a broken leg, nothing else to do, and you want to waste a few minutes of your life, don't watch this movie, go have a nap, or maybe watch a movie that you've already seen and like it a lot.
An error has occured. Please try again.