User Reviews (16)

Add a Review

  • Warning: Spoilers
    More than any other Hallmark mystery series I have watched, I believe Ruby Herring Mysteries has improved dramatically, writing-wise as it went along. Assuming the same actors and the same writers, I would not mind at all another batch of these mysteries from Hallmark.

    What has improved the most is the depiction of Ruby Herring as a reporter interviewing "people of interest". In the first episode, Silent Witness, Ruby seemed almost amateurish interviewing possible suspects in her role as sleuth. The interviewees were defensive and even confrontational. This seemed odd given Ruby's supposed history with interviewing people as a television news reporter.

    The producers must have hired some reporter writers with television experience, because this aspect of the show has improved dramatically.

    Along with being an attractive and personable woman, Ruby, as a television personality, would be "catnip" for most of the people she wanted to interview.

    Not just because everyone wants their 15 minutes of fame. But because, as a "News you can Use" television consumer reporter, Ruby would have garnered respect and admiration even more than your average reporter. The writers seemed to finally get this, and made her interviews of suspects and witnesses much less contentious than in the earlier episode.

    On the negative side, the writers create too many coincidences where Jake shows up to save Ruby from possible danger. The writers try to show this as Jake looking to keep Ruby safe. But it was more creepy than sweet. Other Hallmark shows do a much better job with this dynamic.

    The introduction of Ruby's ex, Luke Baldwin, was, I suppose, meant to introduce a possible romantic triangle. But the writers sabotage that possibility almost every chance they get, leaving us the question why introduce this character to begin with.

    Despite these criticisms, I liked the episode quite a bit.

    The mystery itself was good. Being a cold case, it was believably unraveled clue by clue--with Ruby believably often leading Jake with the discoveries.

    The personal chemistry between Ruby and Jake is well played by Taylor Cole and Stephen Huszar. Ruby and Jake's working relationship was interesting with some believable sexual tension developing.

    It was particularly enjoyable and fun to watch Ruby teasing and teaching Jake how to improve his golf swing. And Jake's "appreciation" of the attention Ruby was giving him was also well played by Stephen Huszar.
  • nogodnomasters14 May 2020
    Warning: Spoilers
    Ruby Herring (Taylor Cole) is a consumer broadcaster in Seattle assigned to investigative reporting. She is given a clue to a cold case murder of a psychic (Megan Leitch). It is a clue only the killer would know, something that didn't come up until the end. Ruby, looking like Meagan Fox for much of film teams up with police detective Jake Killian (Stephen Huszar) who looks like Chris Hemsworth. There are enough characters and suspects to make a film and I am surprised how neatly it was done in less than 90 minutes. Good Editing? Directing? Writing? Ruby is Nancy Drew grown up, although she needed help. I wish they didn't introduce new suspect 30 minutes from the end. Good for a TV movie.
  • 6/10 - HMM is pretty par-for-the-course; nothing bad, but nothing extraordinary
  • The latest in the Ruby Herring series of mysteries from Hallmark has Taylor Cole getting a new job at her Seattle TV station changing from consumer reporter to crime reporter. A move that doesn't please all her colleagues but does give her some semi-official status for her work.

    It also makes working with her police detective friend Stephen Huszar a bit easier. Their case is a reopened cold case of the murder of a psychic, shot while she was given a reading.

    I have to commend the producers of the Ruby Herring series for having Mig Macario's rather openly and stereotypically gay character as part of the seriees. Macario plays Cole's friend and confidante and maybe thie could lead to a feature with some gay overtones in the plot.
  • icewineannie26 October 2020
    Wow....incredibly bad acting, especially from John Wesley Shipp who plays Ruby's dad...surprised they keep making these.
  • I'm a big fan of Taylor Cole! I know these Ruby Herring Mysteries are not her finest roles, but that is in great part due to the writing. This episode, Prediction Murder, is much better than the previous two. Considering the 100's of movies that Hallmark produces annually, for our enjoyment, I think the series has a chance to grow. We shouldn't complain about the repetition of predictable ending and familiar plots or we could lose it all together. Just watch something else if you don't appreciate Hallmark type productions.
  • SnoopyStyle24 May 2020
    TV reporter Ruby Herring (Taylor Cole) is promoted to the crime beat. The police is reopening a cold murder case of a psychic from five years ago. After getting an anonymous clue, she investigates with help from her father (John Wesley Shipp) and police detective partner Jake Killian (Stephen Huszar).

    This is the third in the Hallmark series. At least, she is now a crime reporter which makes her solving crimes a lot more reasonable. The series continues to have a chemistry issue. The guy is as stiff as a board. Cole could do something more with a better partner. I wonder if a change is possible at this point. Maybe in the next one, Jake gets killed and Ruby has to solve his murder. As for the murder case, it's not that well written. It's just questioning one character after another. It's not actually a partnership which suggests going it alone is a perfectly fine option.
  • femcb11 April 2020
    I really enjoyed this one. But found myself annoyed that when the character of Gladys kept looking familiar i couldn't figure out who she was by looking here. Thankfully the credits at the end listed her. Her name is BJ Harrison, and I was right I've seen her in several other things.
  • I usually enjoy Hallmark Mysteries. They are bubblegum for the brain and a great antidote to 2020 blues.

    This series is just adequate/mediocre and a real disappointment.

    The real problem is with the acting. It's so bad in some places that I wasn't really paying attention to the story, I was just staring in awe waiting for it to improve. The worst offender was John Wesley Shipp who played John Herring/Dad. He used to be quite a decent actor. I don't know what happened but he was ham fisted, flat and his timing was off.

    Taylor Cole as Ruby Herring is as wooden as ever and always seems conscious of where the camera is to show off her cheek bones and tilt her head.

    Stephen Huszar as Jake Killian was pretty good, although how he managed the performance he gave with the co-stars he was working with is a mystery. I'm not entirely sure I'd be able to keep a straight face.

    I tried, I really did. I wanted to love this series but I won't be wasting my time on any more of these. Hallmark have much better scripts and actors to waste time on this. I hope Stephen Huszar finds something better.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    "...when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth..." - Sherlock Holmes, The Sign of The Four, Chapter 6 Like Conan Doyle's classic literary detective, Jake and Ruby must undertake the exacting tasks of following up clues - received anonymously this time, sifting information, applying hard evidence e.g. in this case forensic data*, log entries, CCTV footage, and pinpointing and evaluating suspects in order to home in on the truth. *For example, Jake shrewdly remarks about the inoperable state of the murder weapon, which gives the admirable new character of Dakota the opportunity to explain the necessary laboratory procedures to follow and confirm for Jake that the new member of staff knows what she's doing - Jake takes nothing for granted - as well as enlightening both Ruby and the viewer. The challenges are as always to distinguish truth from error, the relevant from the irrelevant and the substantial from the circumstantial and to identify where means, motive and opportunity line up versus where they don't. The end result is surprising, given the direct and brutal nature of the homicide but it fits with the killer's overarching aim of revenge. It is interesting that apparently minor occurrences like the format of writing the date and the accidental activation of a PA system have a major influence on trapping the villain, Ruby adroitly, surreptitiously and shrewdly employing the PA system in the denouement to eliminate any possibility of the suspect appealing to a her-word-against-mine defense in a court of law. It's good the way that Ruby elicits guidance from her dad on the case and of course on the reappearance of her ex. She needed a lot of moral courage to call off her wedding on the very day but that's another of Ruby's character traits. She doesn't go along with keeping up appearances, as with our unofficial family motto: non configurati confirmemus - don't conform confirm. Dakota really gives Ruby the confirmation that she needs about Jake and herself when Dakota says, "You will be i.e. a definite couple. I have a sixth sense about these things." Further confirmation follows, again with apparently minor occurrences, but definitely when Jake declares to Ruby, "You deserve the best." She knows that she would only ever be second best with her ex, his career inevitably always coming first. St Paul tells us in his First Letter to the Thessalonian Church to prove all things, hold fast that which is good. Ruby has done that with respect to Jake versus her ex. The bizarre part of RHM3 is Ruby's brief and unsettling encounter with what is undoubtedly a familiar spirit. They do exist. It is clear that accurate disclosures are made to Ruby about her state of mind that could not have been gleaned by a stranger from any conventional source e.g. the web. Ruby, a pure and ultra-highly principled young woman understandably fled the scene. It would therefore be interesting if David Duchovny and Gillian Anderson could reprise their X-Files roles for guest appearances in RHM4+ to explain the situation. I give RHM3 9/10 which is a bit severe but I suggest that on departing the police interview, one hard-bitten suspect could have said to Jake, "One last thing, Detective, and this is man-to-man. Speaking of pretty pearls, hang on to that Ruby Red. She's one in a million." Jake would wholeheartedly agree.
  • d-robold17 April 2020
    3/10
    Bland
    I enjoyed the first in this series but as the Episodes continue it's all so uninteresting and improbable.
  • Design889 April 2020
    This is the third movie in the Ruby Herring Mysteries series but it's even more painful than the others in terms of script, direction, pacing and acting. It also has more of a video quality which adds to the feeling that one is watching a high school play.
  • This is not my favorite mystery solving duo in the Hallmark Mystery Movie franchise. I am afraid I am more of an Aurora Teagarden and Hannah Swensen fan...and I am really warming to the Mystery 101 series. This series is somewhere in the middle of the pack for me.

    Actually living in Seattle, I am somewhat annoyed with these series saying they are in Seattle but yet not actually being filmed here. Wrong high schools, wrong buses, wrong boats, wrong mountains, wrong police cars, wrong architecture....just wrong wrong wrong. That is annoying. Just say it is Vancouver or California or whatever...who cares?!?!? The mysteries are about the small details, yet no one is paying attention to the small details in the series. Jake and Ruby do not have the best on screen chemistry...which let's face it is why I really watch these "mysteries".

    Will I keep watching? Maybe, unless there is something better out there...and right now I am really enjoying Turkish TV!
  • Big changes are in store for consumer investigations reporter Ruby (Cole), who after solving two murders has been upgraded to the crime beat. She can finally poke into these cases like it's her job and starts chasing down leads right away when someone leaves a note on her doorstep. The clue helps her find a gun that was used in the killing of psychic Rose Vitello. Rose's killing went unsolved and predictably, none of the suspects are eager to revisit the crime. They don't have a choice though when Detective Jake Killian is at hand.

    Some of the suspects are Rival psychic Travis Tru, Rose's ex-boyfriend and Richard, also comes under scrutiny, as well as Rose's estranged daughter, Emily.

    Despite some good acting, humour and a good pace, this is a bit of a flat tyre, especially in the first half, but picks up a little but doesn't raise up above average. Ticks the boxes for a time pass.
  • linda-plant217 October 2020
    What's happened to Taylor Cole ? I had to look twice to see if it was really her. Always a fan of hers from her previous output of films, but the long hair and thicker eyebrows almost make her unrecognisable from the shorter bob she used to sport. Not everyone suits longer hair, so please have the chop Taylor !
  • Toonami66614 March 2021
    It's a two thumbs down for this movie.



    Also it's a -10 out of 10 stars