Add a Review

  • I am NOT the sort of tourist that Vegas loves. I've been to Vegas and am going back very soon--and never, ever gamble. So, I did enjoy watching this show because it introduced me to a side of Las Vegas I've never really experienced. I just walk THROUGH the casinos in order to get to other places--and at just about all the Vegas hotels you are forced to walk through the casinos to get anywhere! Now I am not being sanctimonious about not gambling...I just don't have an interest.

    The documentary consists of Louis tagging along with several so- called 'high rollers'--people who consistently go to Vegas and spend a lot gambling. Some of them were very troubling--particularly the lady who claims to have lost $4,000,000 playing the slots (a game with the worst odds of all and which involves no skill). And, to try to see what it's like, Louis gambles a bit of his own money.

    Overall, this episode of Theroux's series is a bit light-weight compared to most. In other words, it doesn't seem to have a lot to say or isn't especially profound. Still, you get to see what the life of a high-roller is in Vegas--the sorts of comps they get, the money they spend and the attitudes that come along with them. Mildly interesting.
  • Everyone knows that casino gambling is a long term losing bet. The odds are against you with the house edge even if certain people don't want to admit it. This Louis Theroux documentary touches on that point and many others as it explores Las Vegas. It isn't a heavy handed anti-gambling pic, but it does show the place for what it is. An entertaining place primarily built to separate gamblers from all their money.

    The tone is generally light and pleasant. You never glimpse any heavy depraved sadness as Louis strolls the Hilton Hotel & Casino property circa 2007. You do hear serious sums of money being lost however. He follows around (some hardcore) gamblers and you get an idea from most of them why they do it. They can afford to in all cases, but it's gone from being entertainment to an addiction.

    Louis has a hard job straddling a fine line. You can definitely sense he's trying not to judge, but he hardly looks comfortable being a bystander. I question if the Hilton imposed rules or a contract with him in able to film. He asks some polite, but point blank questions to gamblers and various staff members. Did he expect the predictable answers he got in return. There's a fair bit of avoidance of reality.

    When he puts up some of his own money and starts drinking, you can see he's having a good time. As his own narration points out, he understands for the first time the duel edged sword. He ends up playing high limit baccarat & leaves his session up which always helps your outlook on gambling. When you're winning it's fun. If you're doing it purely for entertainment with an expectation that you're going to lose more times than not (and it's money you can afford to loss with no pain) it can still be fun.

    Las Vegas was the mecca for debauchery, gamblers until Macau rolled around. As a light gambler, I felt this doc delivered what it set out to do. Only a hardcore degen who feels the need to justify his addiction or a sadist who wants to see lives ruined in dark detail won't like this fun "inside" peek.
  • safenoe21 December 2020
    5/10
    Vega$
    Louis always allows his interviewees to spill their guts, but ideally I'd like to have seen Louis interview some of the casino staff to get their perspective on the big whales and the regular folk who hope to win big $$$ I guess.
  • bombersflyup10 September 2018
    Warning: Spoilers
    A fairly inaccurate and thin look at the heart of gambling, as Louis doesn't delve very deep.

    Louis's presence alone affects the experience these people are having, he won't actually let go and try and have a good time, as he remains reserved the entire time and him being there and basically telling them how stupid they are for gambling can only hinder they're enjoyment. It's interesting to see the complimentary room the guy gets, you think he'd be spending a fair amount of time there. The problem's this documentary's very limited and doesn't really show what happens overall, you see what they allow you to see. The old woman's there because she's rich and wants to spend her days in the casino instead of home alone, the question that needs to be asked is why she's spending every day playing a game that doesn't yield entertainment, someone needs to set her up in bingo or something.

    Gambling's entertainment, people spend money on other entertainment the same, that's obvious. Sometimes it can be life altering if people lose big and feel the need to chase their losses to be able to get back to a level of stability. The method in which Louis is doing this documentary is weak and he doesn't go all-in, so to speak. A look behind the scenes would be better and some in-depth questions at a minimum.