User Reviews (89)

Add a Review

  • This was quite an interesting, quirky and original little film. Great concept with decent special effects, cgi and acting.

    The main character, while you can tell he is a good actor, at times felt a little bit... too over the top. This could have been the directing or lack there of, who knows. It also got a bit repetitive in the middle which slowed it down a bit. I found the twist interesting and unexpected and it drew very interesting parallels within the concept that I appreciated.

    Regardless, it was entertaining and a breath of fresh air as far as the originality of the concept goes. Would recommend.
  • athanasiosze5 October 2022
    As other reviewers mentioned, this is an original movie. The concept is interesting, there are surprises and a twist i didn't see it coming. Kwanten's acting is wacky and weird, but this is a weird and insane movie and he did what he was supposed to do a character like "Wes". This is not a comedy-horror movie although there are many funny lines and scenes. I liked the comedy element and, generally, this movie kept my interest.

    However, it's flawed. Just because it's original, doesn't mean that it's also brilliant. Or even just clever. There are moments that it was getting too weird/bizarre. I love weird/bizarre movies but, in order for a weird movie to be good, writers and directors should handle the subject very carefully and deftly/skilfully. Or else, their movie will look like a parody of what they imagined and try to achieve. There is a line between originality and creativity and this movie didn't cross it.

    Too many movies, too little time. There are better movies to watch. However, if you have plenty of time and you love weird and original movies, you will probably like it. It's not a bad /dumb movie and, mainly, it makes sense. There are many movies today that, unfortunately, don't make much sense.
  • Originality, good actors, out of the box.

    The only thing I can say is: start watching and you won't stop.

    No big company would do such a creative movie.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I didn't think the set up would be as interesting as it was. It was a very unusual film. Like it's not a traditional horror, and doesn't really have anything scary going on, but I wouldn't know what else to call it either. So I can see why this film might not work for everyone.

    So there's a voice coming from a glory-hole in a public toilet, who tells the main character he is needed to save the world. For the most part it's dialogue through the main character, and a voice from a being who claims to be a god. With some memory flashbacks.

    There is some dark humour going on, but it's not really a horror comedy either.

    But with the way it ends, you're not really sure if what happened was real, or if the lead is just having a manic episode.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Directed by Rebekah McKendry (All the Creatures Were Stirring) and written by David Ian McKendry, Joshua Hull, and Todd Rigney, this film finds a depressed Wes (Ryan Kwanten) dealing with his breakup by hitting the road. At a rest stop, he gets drunk and burns everything he owns. Heading into the restroom to puke, he finds himself locked inside a stall while the next one over, inside a glory hole, is a voice belonging to J. K. Simmons.

    That voice is a cosmic god by the name of Ghat and if Wes wants to save all of reality, he must submit his body to him. But is that really a Lovecraftian monster inside the other toilet? Is Wes really the good person he claims to be? And will two abused children - a hungover human and an Elder God - be able to bond? Are we all doomed?

    Glorious has a great concept and would probably be even better as a short than a high concept full-length. That said, I was in no way bored by this movie and you should probably check it out - it's exclusively on Shudder - and make up your own mind. You'll never pee in a rest stop the same way again.
  • GrandJury24 August 2022
    While J. K. Simmons is a fan favorite, not even he could save this from the mediocrity of just MEH, nor could he do anything, apparently, about it dragging on and on and on and on, far past its turning-it-off point.

    Tip: Spend your viewing time on something better. You're welcome.
  • If you don't like weird movies don't watch Glorious because weird is an understatement. I was actually entertained by it and so was my wife. The whole movie is filmed at one location, in one room and that with basically only one actor. Well there are a couple more actors but their part is short. Sounds like ingredients for a disaster but it wasn't. Ryan Kwanten that I only know from the good show True Blood where he played Jason Stackhouse gave a convincing performance playing his character. J. K. Simmons is never visible, he plays the narrative voice, a voice that is very easily recognizable. The story is mysterious and that's what keeps you interested. As for the horror parts it's bloody and gross but it's well done considering the low budget it has. In short I've seen way worse horror movies than Glorious, a movie that is worth a one-time watch.
  • It was interesting for a while, it has it's moments but not enough for it's run time.

    I could see it working better in a 30-40 min format with a different actor.
    • J. K. Simmons's voice is in the movie. Not J. K. Simmons himself. A shame.


    • Special effects are not bad.


    • The story is quirky and interesting with a few twists I didn't see coming. That being said, there is repetition, and it sometimes drags on and on.


    • The setting/location is surprisingly intriguing and unique for the story to unfold. It was fun.


    • It surprisingly did not feel like a cheap movie. It felt like thought, care and love went into it. And the audience can appreciate that.


    • Only one funny moment fell flat, the other funny moments landed pretty well.


    • I'd say check the movie out if this is your type of genre.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    The title is, of course, a reference to the post-credit line, meaning I actually did watch this in full.

    Well, what can I say...It wasn't good. I always feel bad bashing simpler movies by inspired directors filmed on a minimal budget. But this one just wasn't the case.

    Yes, it felt very cheap, but this wasn't the problem. Cheap CGI was ok, minimal cast - fine, one location - no biggie. The problem(s) were pretty much everything else.

    1. The direction in some scenes was horrible, pushing bad/inconsistent acting to parody levels.

    2. The editing, in the beginning, was frantic and disorienting. One shouldn't edit introductory scenes like this.

    3. I'll just list all other problems with one word - the script. It just wasn't interesting. Why not craft an interesting story if it's a small enthusiast-level production? The premise was there, and it just went absolutely nowhere. In the end, the core was just as simple as in 'Amulet (2020)'. An old god was punishing a bad man for his actions.

    Simmons was excellent, but there was little to no exciting dialogue and one good joke. I enjoyed his voice lines as much as I could, but at some point, I gave up. And I can assure you that small films about two people talking in rooms can be great. I mean, we do have Infinity Chamber (2016). It's not like I'm making this up.

    Overall, I don't know what went wrong or what the film was supposed to become, but it failed in the process and will be forgotten, just as mentioned in the end.

    I still don't know why it's called Glorious, though.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Including the company animations in the very beginning of the movie it took me until about minute 1:30 to be 100% sure the night I watched the movie is going to be a Lovecraftian night. (Those who have seen In the Mouth of Madness know why)

    A couple of days later I had to rewatch the movie because I did not clearly remember why I liked the movie so much. No surprise: There's lots of (important!) conversation going on that is packed with details all over while the scene basically never changes.

    For my taste the bit of humor going on is ok and shouldn't be overdone (which the movie doesn't) in a lovecraftian based story. Lovecraft fans are fed well here, being handed over a whole bunch of what actually defines cosmic horror in the world of humans.

    And let's be honest: I love how, in scenes with conversation, the movie draws all of your attention and then rips you out of that comfort zone to go wild with the tension. It's a constant back and forth of action events that aren't action events but damn, do they make you sit tight in your movie couch there.

    So here's my take on what I think is actually going on in that movie. If you read this review, already marked as "contains spoilers", up this far, the following section WILL definitely contain spoilers:

    Wes, clear to see in the beginning of the movie, is worried deeply about something. He has visions during the day while driving a car, not good. But, as a matter of fact, at this point we already know that Wes isn't where or when he used to be before. In my opinion only comfirmed by "We will be so happy Nellie" playing on the radio before the movie title rolls in.

    In bad shape Wes arrives at a rest house and it seems our main character is desperately lost in love after a break-up. Since he tries to call his ex girlfriend, known as Brenda, and get in touch with her it seems she got enough of him and called it a time out which Wes has a hard time digesting. Later we meet the cosmic god Ghatanotoah sitting in the toilet cabin, asking for dialogue who does 3 things: A) He explains to the viewer what the lovecraftian universe is about in full featurette which also includes the power of playing with your mind, causing madness, denial, pain, showing you things you can't imagine, how to pronounce names of cosmic deities as far as humanly possible, visualization (eg paintings) and all that.

    B) Due to the complex nature a humand mind couldn't handle he tries to explain to Wes what situation he is in and what all of that is actually about. Of course, since such complexity can't be described, Wes ends up with not understanding the situation at all.

    C) He always gives hints.

    So how does this puzzle all together?

    The woman in the beginning is simply a "gate keeper". Someone who knows about those powers but wise enough to feed from them while maintaining a certain distance to the cosmic powers. Besides making sure the "guests" find to the "event" safely, she is also the one who announces what the upcoming show is about: "You know some things seem broken, but it usually means you stopped trying". What this means we'll get to later.

    Ghat, being the firstborn child of Cthulhu, explains multiple times that some things are beyond human capacity and tries to simplify things in order to make it easier for Wes to get through the process ("I suppose in some mythologies you could say demigod, titan would be more accurate but those are human constructs limiting the form understanding of what I truly am"). Not only is Ghat respectful and well-mannered pretty much most of the time, he also fills in Wes right at the beginning "I'm sure you are forgetting the most important things here - the two of us". This tells us who the gladiators in the arena are. Just Wes and Ghat.

    Ghat also mentions a couple of times that he hasn't spoken to anyone in a long time and that he is a very lonely and very old god. Adding that he usually resides on the ether and that destiny brought both of them to this "place". This raises the question of how both got to this kind of private meeting when saying "destiny". Especially when Ghat makes statements like "Unfortunately I am not in charge of maintaining this establishment" and "Some things are beyond my control". I think we are also given answers here.

    My core part assumption:

    At the end we see it's Wes' girlfriend finding a red box while Wes looks caught off guard and holding a towel. After Brenda looks at photos of women in pain Wes is holding a knife, followed by a scene of them two standing in front of each other, Brenda crictically wounded and Wes holding a glass shard in his hand.

    First: Yes, Wes is absolutely desperate about Brenda and deeply in love with her. The I-can't-live-without-her syndrome.

    With all the cards on the table Wes has 2 problems: 1) He's got a mental illness, which is explained by his behaviour, in example being obsessed about Brenda and how he goes totally banana crazy in front of the rest house. Also, Wes early on kind of introduces himself without being asked with a "Hihihi - nice little statement of my life" where the giggle means to refer to his life being a joke, going crazy all the time.

    It is unclear if Wes killed Brenda because she discovered something she shouldn't have discovered or because he had to feed his need to kill again. Sure is Wes' mental illness received a big shock as being desperate about Brenda is mixed with Brenda being dead makes things for Wes even worse. A fundamental part of Wes' illness is also that he is unable to deal with emotions.

    B) The 2nd problem comes in: Ghat. He validates Wes being mentally ill by saying "Full of feelings you've never felt before, looking for a way to make them all go away. No one is coming to help you, you're all alone. Just like you preferred."

    In this statement from Ghat lies another statement: Wes wanted to be alone anyways. Maybe he feels like he doesn't deserve this life, which might be indicated by the answer "I stopped feeling a long time" when Ghat asks "Don't you at least want to feel good about something in your life?". Also, this statement is a clear reference that Wes has not yet found his purpose in this existence of his. In another situation Wes watches part of the cosmic universe outside and seems to like it, to which Ghat comments that he (Wes) is now feeling something and this is something that makes him afraid.

    As Ghat is a cosmic deity he enjoys the torture. He could quickly kill Wes just like he killed Gary, but Gary is not the "object of interest" for Ghat. Gary joined the scene only to demonstrate, as Ghat said, what his current form is capable of, to help visualize the cruel fear that is unleashed and that Ghat has the ability to freeze people looking at him on the spot. Wes is of interest to Ghat as he happened to sacrifice 12 women to Ghat (Ghat briefly asks if Wes wants him to name them, in alphabetical or chronological order) and therefore receives a special gift. A gift Ghat reasons with him and Wes are only here to bring destruction, both should not exist, which is why both have to go.

    And when Ghat said "Tell me about that knot in the pit of your stomach", Wes memorizes Brenda asking "What did you do Wes?", unexpectedly having a short flow of tears coming down Wes' face, showing that Ghat was very close getting inside Wes' head. To try fight that, Wes tries to flee into memories, to which Ghat soon after also denies access to. Ghat eventually takes everything away from Wes that means to him. How else would Wes open up and stand for his actions he hid deep down in his subconscious mind instead of blaming the universe? Because until Wes doesn't consciously understand he killed 12 women he won't go free. Free by death in this case.

    To crack Wes open Ghat does the following things: A) Taking away Brenda from Wes' memories B) Taking away the chance that even with Wes' death any memory about Brenda will still exist in this world C) The total anihilation of the world. With Ghat's transformation complete he would turn everything into nothing D) The fact that Brenda is among the sacrifices in posession of Ghat now. Inidcated by Ghat saying "She was hurt, she was heart-broken. She trusted you, (Brenda in Wes' memory: "I love you Wes"), and you broke that trust, you devasted her, you broke her heart, you felt that pain and you cannot stop feeling it" as well as "She's so tied to your misery that she's practically here with us now".

    So letting Ghat into Wes' mind entirely allows Ghat to explain to Wes what he is responsible for. The tentacle is just a visual link, the liver is just a symbolic link to where Wes most probably stabbed the women he killed and the glass shard Wes has to cut himself open with another symbolic link for (again most probably) the knife he used to kill the women with. So when Ghat does all this cosmic interaction with Wes, he finishes the ritual of "It's broken? I won't stop trying to fix it" (remember the lady in front of the rest house) and let's Wes go afterwards while Ghat disappears into the ether again, probably hiding until he receives new sacrfices in a set of 12.

    In case you wonder how it is possible for someone like Gary to hear and see what's going on although there is some stealth dome or something like that: For one Ghat mentioned that some things are beyond his control. As his interest is towards Wes only, there is no need for him to have control over anyone else.

    In case you wonder why sometimes the rest house is at the parking lot and sometimes somewhere in space: The deeper Wes is in the process of "therapy", the nearer he is to the cosmic universe. Because this is what it is: A therapy that Ghat performs. For that he needs bait, such as "my father will find me".

    In my opinion: Great idea, well made movie and I love how it puts the lovecraftian universe onto the screen. It's not "a (John) Carpenter", but this movie is definitely showing off. Can only recommend.
  • As an avid Lovecraft fan, I kinda knew what I was in for and that it would have some good twists and cosmic lore. I was pleasantly surprised by the layers, actors and the very dark final twist, that gave it a delicious aftertaste. The movie wasn't perfect, but for a low budget cosmic horror movie, it was pretty great. I would have liked the main character to be written a little more cerebral and cool headed, but that's just me.

    I think the part that made me cringe the most was all the touching of the toilet in the restroom. It set a pretty disgusting atmosphere, which turns out to be quite appropriate in the end.

    Overall, very unique and entertaining.
  • J. K. Simmons voice over is maybe the only reason you should watch this movie but seeing that so much else is stacked against that - writing/plot, effects, pacing, etc I don't think I can recommend it in the end.

    It just feels like the director was incompetent here and didn't steer the movie in a firm enough direction.
  • The premise alone should let you know if this is for you. Are you the kind of person would be amused by a Lovecraftian monster in a rest stop glory hole? Does that appeal to your sensibility?

    While clearly low brow, it doesn't cross the line into gross out territory as much as it could have, and stays as classy as a movie that takes place entirely in a bathroom possibly could. While there's little that's expressly funny or scary, there's an intrigue to the somewhat novel concept, keeping you interested in how it will all play out. I'll admit that a good deal of the novelty comes from an appreciation for J. K. Simmons, that dude rules, and even though he's never on screen, I can picture him delivering the lines, and that makes me smile a bit.

    Its feel is reminiscent of a horror short made for a show like Cabinet of Curiosities or Tales From the Crypt, and with it's lean runtime, it's not too far off from one of those. It's eye on the prize simplicity delivers the goods before it wears out it's welcome, giving you just what you came for, nothing more, nothing less.
  • thesar-229 October 2022
    And you thought the bathroom in Saw was bad.

    Sookie's brother gets trapped in a disgusting rest stop bathroom with someone, or something, in the stall next to him. Additionally, his past is really gonna haunt him.

    I thought this movie was just okay at first, but I stuck with it. And glad I did. It does get progressively better and gorier. There were some impressive shots, though nothing way out of the ordinary. The final decision our "hero" has to make totally adds on top of what he already had to endure. It was even hard on me to see, even after all the disgusting and completely unsanitary bathroom scenes.

    It's super short - thank the gods. It knew when to quit and I liked the ending's interpretation. Totes recommended.

    ***

    Final Thoughts: OH! Now I get the title, way after the movie concluded.
  • LordManhattan18 August 2022
    Even though Glorious has a very short runtime of only 79 minutes, it feels a bit dragged out. This is the type of movie that work best as a 30 minute short film.
  • Yes - this is absurd and a tad silly in places. Despite that, entertaining and worth watching. Original, different, and engrossing, I have no idea what the negativity is about. Enjoyable.
  • Even at 1h19m it feels like it drags for 2hrs! Pointless and aimless dialog.

    It's just plain bad, who wrote this? Why is J. K Simmons involved in this? That's the only reason I gave it a chance in the first place.
  • Just watched glorious at Sitges Film Festival 2022. If you can, watch it in a cinema. The response was incredible. Now for the review.

    With a plot doomed to fail, Rebekah McKendry somehow succeeds in making an entertaining horror comedy. You can tell at times, that the budget is low, and the lead actor is over the top throughout most of the movie, and while it works sometimes, it does get a bit much at others.

    Let's get one thing straight right away: it's labelled as a horror film. Is it scary? No. This ain't a horror movie. But Beside, the labelling, the film is great from a technical point of view. The camerawork is great, albeit not the most innovative, the sound is both believable and fitting at all times and soundtrack is great. Besides that technical assets, The plot is also surprisingly good and innovative. The takeaway, however, is the directing. Most scenes seem both original and thoughtfully cared for and the originality is undeniably impossible to ignore. Even the actors do a great job and both Sylvia grace from and J.k. Simmons are great throughout every scene of the movie.

    The movie does suffer from some pacing issues but the innovation and flow considering the one location is impeccable. With all this in mind however, the film is so hard review due to its insanity. It's funny, haunting, captivating, original and surprising, but the whole situation is so jarring that it can at times be hard to concentrate on what's actually going on on screen. For me, most of it worked, but for most it probably won't.

    Is it however the best horror film of the year? Not close. It feels as a gofundme funded movie. It really shouldn't exist, but it does, and it's awesome. Watch it in a cinema of with your friends on the couch. You probably won't be scared, but you'll probably laugh out loud.
  • This looked interesting. I had no idea what to expect. I like odd, offbeat looking films, like this appeared to be.... but I did not care for this.

    I originally made it 40 minutes in and was pretty bored and gave up to play Xbox. The next day, while trimming my weed I figured I would try watching it again. I made it to the ending, realizing that I should have stopped where I did the night before.

    I enjoy films that leave you questioning and thinking about what you just saw.... but this... this was a waste of my time.
  • A horror movie centered around a public restroom GLORYHOLE seemed absurd but this movie is surprisingly good! The back and forth dialogue between Ryan Kwanten and the Lovecraftian creature in the bathroom stall is really interesting, creepy and even at times quite funny (dark humor)! There's some blood & gore (not too much) and the creature FX are excellent!

    As usual Kwanten's acting is fantastic and having J. K. Simmons as the voice of the creature was pure genius!

    For a movie that basically takes place in 1 main setting i wasn't bored for even a second! VERY good movie!
  • Glorious (2022) is a movie recently added to Shudder. The storyline follows a man who recently has something unfortunate happen between him and his girlfriend and now lives out of his car. He pulls over at a rest stop to get some rest and when he wakes up he uses the bathroom. Once in the bathroom he gets trapped inside and peer pressured into doing things by an intergalactic beast that to the naked eye appears to be a fancy truck stop glory hole...

    This movie was directed by Rebekah McKendry (All the Creatures were Stirring) and stars Ryan Kwanten (Dead Silence), J. K. Simmons (Spider-Man), Tordy Clark (Anything's Possible), Sylvia Grace Crim (The Hunt) and André Lamar (First Wives Club).

    This movie had a lot going for it. Ryan Kwanten delivers an amazing performance. JK Simmons was also a great choice as the voice of the creature. The settings are very well created. The bathroom reminded me of the cellar in Saw. The CGI horror effects were also good. The storyline itself was creative, unique and well executed. My biggest complaint is that I wanted more from this film. The intensity and horror elements needed to be taken a step further.

    Overall, this is a solid addition to the horror genre and worth watching once. I would score this a solid 6/10.
  • The last known good voice acting I heard was the one of HAL 9000 the artificial intelligence aboard the spacecraft Discovery One. Simmons gives an equally powerful performance that should immortalize him. This and his performance in The Ladykillers 2004.

    Back to this film. It concerns elements of H. P. Lovecraft's lore coupled with a tense survival drama theme. If you like Clive Barker and Stuart Gordon movies, you'll be at home with this one.

    However the film does have it's shortcomings. The special effects are meager. There are a lot of plot holes. The entire film is carried by two actors: Ryan Christian Kwanten plays the physical role while J. K. Simmons does the voice-acting part of the creature.

    Christian Kwanten does an exceptional role but his and Simmon's talents are wasted on a pointless script and at times dubious direction. All in all, just about worth one's time.

    I would recommend you to also watch Stuart Gordon's excellent movie From Beyond 1986 which has special effects from the acclaimed special effects wizard Mark Shostrom.
  • becky-923468 September 2022
    Glorious (2022) follows a man who is stuck in the rest stop toilets with a mysterious man talking to him from the adjacent stall. This film had a unique concept, but the execution was somewhat poor and it just didn't capture me attention as much as I was hoping. However there were some elements I liked and the ending really saved it for me!

    The effects were fairly poor, but I do understand this was due to a lower budget, the cinematography was actually pretty good though! I liked some of the camerawork and angles and I really liked the bright, vibrant colour palettes!

    The sound design was alright in this film, but didn't have anything special about it really. The soundtrack was decent and somewhat comedic at times, and the score was a bit odd and unfitting. Nearer the end, the score improved a lot and I wish it was like this all throughout the duration!

    JK Simmons as the Voice was great casting, and he was so instantly recognisable! The acting and line delivery was all around pretty good, especially from Ryan Kwanten playing the lead, Wes. I wasn't keen on how his character was written at first, but did grow to like him a bit!

    The humour was alright and got a couple of laughs out of me, but was a bit too ridiculous sometimes. I found the humour ruined the tension and was used too often, if it was a little more toned down I feel this could've worked better. The film had a few drastic tonal shifts for comedic effect, which somewhat worked.

    The pacing for the film was alright, but a tad messy at times. For the most part I was entertained, although there wasn't much tension. The plot twist near the end was phenomenal and caught me off guard big time, it was by far the best part of the film. It had such a dark ending which I appreciated!
  • The warming and welcoming place for a horror lover called Shudder offers us another low-budget effort, with... J. K. Simmons? Whoa. Ryan Kwanten? I'll take that. And it looks to be lovecraftian? Jackpot! Seriously though, once in a while an imaginative, low-key horror production, an unlikely underdog, inspired by certain loved horror traditions, puts in enough effort to pleasantly surprise and provide awesome oddball entertainment. This is one of those, for all the cosmic horror, and tentacle loving fans out there, and those getting their kicks from weird horror comedies.

    This apocalyptic tale starts with Wes (Ryan Kwanten) on the road, following a break-up with his significant other, for at this point very blurry reasons. Tired and stressed, he winds up in a remote rest stop, where the fates of Wes and something otherworldly will collide... For a horror movie that largely takes place alongside toilet stalls and urinals, and features a lovecraftian god glory hole, it is a good one. The concept of "Glorious" is far enough out there to actually work, taking a nice, big spoon from the glowing purple-pinkish soup of lovecraftian horror universe, and with writers challenging the sanity of life itself by asking themselves, what would happen if Lovecraft wrote sit-coms. During its miniscule feature runtime of 78 minutes, for which many do complain, in my opinion, "Glorious" manages to entertain consistently, with never stopping weirdness, little twists, satire and neon-soaked oddities. While Kwanten has given a very good shot at portraying Wes, whose arch I can't speak off, J. K. Simmons delivers an entertaining voice performance, and together they ride out this high-stakes tale in this filthy, but god-blessed rest stop. When the visual effects hit the screen, the budgetary limitations of this lovecraftian epic become very apparent very fast, however, to me the sum of the aesthetic work was equal parts awesome and cheap. It did its job. I'd suppose most of their money went for the two leads.

    I'd dare say it's a sure-fire hit for the right genre fans, I definitely enjoyed both the absurdity of "Glorious" and the absurdity of how it worked as well as it did. If this team of filmmakers ever decide to make another beast like this, I'm all up for it. Don't get me wrong, it's flawed, but it takes a risk, and achieves what feels like an unlikely succession. My rating: 7/10.
An error has occured. Please try again.