User Reviews (102)

Add a Review

  • You could dismiss this film as a Danish history lesson but it is more than that. It is a love story with an improbable background in a rather gloomy setting, the Danish Court of the late 18th century. Mad (or at least seriously disturbed) King Christian VII (Mikkel Folsgaard - superbe) marries 16 year old English princess Caroline (Alicia Vikander) who happens to be George III's sister). He prefers the company of his dog and mistress to her. It is not surprising that Caroline falls for Johann Struensee (Mads Mikkelsen) who becomes the king's personal physician on the strength of his knowledge of Shakespeare (especially Hamlet). The king is, as they say, easily led, and for a year or so Sturensee, despite being German, has a fine time as de facto ruler enacting liberal measures such as the abolition of serfdom and the repeal of censorship laws, not to mention free smallpox inoculations. But the forces of reaction led by the king's stepmother gather. It was surprising to learn that 18th century Denmark was such a backward society.

    Mads Mikkelsen gives a nuanced performance – 'quiet intensity' in fact, and Alicia Vikander is equally intense. They are a serious couple imbued with the ideals of the 18th century Enlightenment but their passion is physical as well as intellectual. Unfortunately their ideals are a little advanced for Denmark of the 1770s despite support from writers such as Voltaire. The local book-burners led by Hoegh-Guldberg (David Dencik) are not swayed by argument of course.

    The production is full of atmosphere. The castles are suitably gloomy and there's plenty of medieval squalor beyond the castle gate. Much of the action takes place in winter which adds to the chilly atmosphere. The aristocracy are suitably heartless and the peasants downtrodden. The king provides some zany (if not quite authentic) moments, appointing his Great Dane to his council and ordering Struensee to make Caroline a "fun queen".

    This is quite a long movie at 140 minutes yet is enthralling from start to finish. Even though you can guess the ending you are swept along by the story and the performances. You can see why the audiences at Cannes loved it.
  • I had the great fortune to be invited to attend the World Premiere at the Berlin Film Festival earlier this evening of this wonderful film -and opportunities like that don't come often.

    A Royal Affair is Oscar level material in many respects. The screenplay, directing and photography are all superb but the performance of Mikkel Følsgaard as Christian VII of Denmark was perfection. It is so difficult to act a madman acting as if he were sane and I cannot believe any actor taking an Oscar this year could have put up a better performance. Mikkel got the loudest cheer from the audience and he thoroughly deserved it.

    The plot revolves around the machinations of power behind the throne of a simpleton monarch. Christian may be King but he simply wants to play like a child. He is married and fathers a son quite brutally but he loves his dog more than his family. And so a German Doctor is called to treat him. Christian befriends his physician and leaves more and more power in the hands of this foreign commoner. And then the Doctor falls in love with the Queen....

    It's all true and I won't tell more than that. Just go and see it as soon as you can. It puts Hollywood and Bollywood both straight into the dust bin. Classic drama, brilliant script and a piece of thespian-ism that puts Olivier to task. Just brilliant.
  • I saw this last night and its been on my mind a lot since then..

    What a fantastic movie!!, i went in with high expectations, as i had only read very positive things about it, and I was definitely not disappointed, what a beautiful, sad and touching story Great acting overall, mads Mikkelsen is always good, and this is one of his best roles in my opinion, Alicia wikander was beautiful as the young queen, but the real star of this movie has to be Mikkel Boe Følsgaard as Christian VII, Wow!!, what a great actor, his portrayal of the mentally ill king was superb, he really made me sympathize with Christian, he may have been of his nutter and mean at times, but deep down, I think he was a good guy, but he was a very insecure young man, who didn't know how to behave properly, and who couldn't deal with the obligation of being king, he was misunderstood, and I felt really bad for him at times, I really like the portrayal of the relationship between the King and struensee, they were really very good friends/companions, and struensee was like a father to Christian.

    The costumes were also beautiful, I love fashion in that period, and this movie had some beautiful clothes to dwell on.

    It was about time my country did a movie on our royal history, and now they have, and the outcome is better then i could have ever expected, just beautiful, Hollywood couldn't have done it better, as a Dane I take pride in our danish (royal)history.

    Go and see it!!, you wont be sorry
  • Historically relevant, A Royal Affair shows its true period-drama nature in the very intelligent and detailed storyline, steadfast and conspicuous acting, and, most of all, sumptuous and glorious interiors, which actually enhance the visual experience significantly. The film expressively reminds the world once again about the illicit affair between Caroline Mathilde (Alicia Vikander), the beautiful Queen of Denmark, and the enlightened, German-born physician named Johann Struensee (Mads Mikkelsen). In all its courtly essence, A Royal Affair presents this 18th century tale with utmost thoroughness, adding huge amounts of tension to its naturalistic substance with every following minute. While it's mostly recognized for the meaningful romantic overtone, this film presents much more than that, even though the star-crossed lovers prove to have the biggest impact on the unexpected turn of events.

    It starts very similarly to Sofia Coppola's Marie Antoinette, with a young princess bound to marry a king she doesn't even know, through the old-fashioned way of a royal transaction. Right after the Queen finally sets her lovely eyes on the mysterious husband-to-be one thing is certain – there is something wrong with his majestic appearance. Christian VII (Mikkel Boe Følsgaard) giggles nervously, and is more interested in greeting his own dog than the woman, with whom he will probably (but not likely) spend the rest of his palace life. Right after the both absolutely awkward and truly humorous announcement of King's nightly visit in his wife's bedroom, and Caroline's anxiously awaited pregnancy, it becomes perfectly clear that the pair won't present itself in the expected, regal way. Those two characters don't even intend to give the appearance of being fully in love with each other. The king wanders angrily around the luxurious chambers making fun of everyone, not knowing that he ostentatiously presents all of his biggest weaknesses. At the same time, the Queen spends most of her time with the newborn baby. When Christian proclaims his forthcoming trip around Europe nobody realizes that big and sudden changes are about to happen. During the journey King's mental illness becomes worse. He needs a private doctor and he needs him quick. This is the moment when Johan Struensee first shows his handsome face. Apart from his unquestionable medical abilities, he proves to be a great admirer of the Enlightenment movement's greatest thinkers and their innovative works, and that's what makes him an ideal partner for the King. After returning to the country, their companionship grows stronger every day. Unfortunately, so does Johan's affection towards Queen's awe-inspiring persona. After a while, it becomes awfully obvious that they won't be able to suppress their deepest urges and a risky romance will soon take place, one that might actually begin a new era in the history of Denmark. Scheming behind the back of the wig-wearing, ignorant council, Caroline and Struensee use the gullible King for the sake of a greater good – they create many new and reformative laws, and using Christian's powerful, yet unstable hand they end up improving the whole land and its citizens' life, rushing Denmark towards the desired Enlightenment.

    As history so often shows, when there is the optimistic, hard-working side there must also be the pessimistic, mischievous one. In A Royal Affair, it takes the form of an ominous, recalcitrant aristocrat named Ove Høegh-Guldberg (David Dencik). Conspiring along with Christian's stepmother Juliane Marie (Trine Dyrholm) he comes up with a perfect plan to get rid of the unwanted German and, at the same time, bring back Denmark's old 'glory'. Revealing the shocking truth about Queen being pregnant with Struensee he wreaks havoc among the society. The return of the Dark Ages is upon Denmark, and no one is able to stop this devastating process, as the King gave in to Ove's strong and convincing character, and, ultimately, to his own illness. Johann and Caroline are banished from the Kingdom, just to see that, sadly, their thorough plan wasn't actually meant to help anyone.

    With its splendidly high entertainment value, A Royal Affair turns out to be a history lesson for everyone. Considerable attention to details in plot and in art design brings out the true substance of the film. The costumes are pitch-perfect, the music flows adequately to the events, and the ongoing transition in the atmosphere intensifies the reception of the whole. A Royal Affair possesses a great energy, which shows its true strength in all the performances. Without offending anyone from the amazing cast, it's important to note that Mads Mikkelsen gave the most award-worthy performance, showing the straightforwardly persuasive impassiveness that may really convince his fans and anti-fans alike. Therefore, those irrefutable acting skills, combined with a well-written script and steady direction, make A Royal Affair one of the most memorable Danish movies of the last decade.
  • A fantastic film about a country whose history is seldom portrayed, A Royal Affair is a historical drama set in the latter half of the 18th century in Denmark. An English girl is sent off to marry the Danish king, only to find out that he's not fully sane. In her loneliness she falls for the king's doctor, and they find they share not only amorous feelings for one another, but a passion for Enlightenment ideas and political reforms.

    There are a few caricatures in this movie that keep me from giving it a higher score: the reactionary forces are pure, unalloyed evil; the reformers are probably far more liberal in thinking than would have been possible in that era; and the preaching against established religion is a bit thick. But otherwise, this is a gem of a movie with outstanding performances in all three key roles, particularly the doctor who is portrayed with an incredible intensity and realism. Also noteworthy is the king who is not quite sane yet not totally loony either; the acting here is frighteningly good and utterly convincing. Last but not least, the queen excels in showing real pathos and long-suffering endurance trapped in her destiny, and then comes alive beautifully in her relationship with the doctor.

    As icing on the cake, costumes are sumptuous, period settings flawless, and the music is era-appropriate and delightfully arcane. Original music is also quite good, though most of the time one is so engrossed in the story that the music just vanishes. Movie is almost all in Danish with English subtitles, and I felt the size/font choice for the titles was too big, too pushy, you never quite forget that you're reading titles.

    This is a tale of exploration of the darker side of the human experience: what does it mean to be sane, how can a divinely ordained monarch be deprived of his wits, to what lengths will a person go to promote his/her progeny into power, are the "unwashed masses" really grateful to those who try to emancipate them? This movie (and its three main characters) will haunt you for many days.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    The Danes tried to put a 'coup d'etat' at the Academy Awards this year with 'En kongelig affære' ('A Royal Affair') directed by Nikolaj Arcel. Having seen that stories about royals and especially about queens bring Oscar statuettes every other year, they put together an impressive historic production based on a steamy story of love, sex, insanity and social reform, all based on true events which took place at the Danish court in the second half of the 18th century. Only one story, one film, based only on 'Amour' stood between 'A Royal Affair' and the Oscar for the best foreign language film.

    The Royal Affair takes place in the second half of the 18th century, by the time winds of changes were blowing all over Europe originating in the ideas of the Enlightenment, and the kings of Europe were losing their minds or their heads. Denmark was ruled by (another) insane king named Christian VII (Mikkel Boe Følsgaard) who took more interest in his dogs and in prostitutes than in his young, beautiful and English wife Caroline Mathilde (the superb Swede actress Alicia Vikander). Her education abroad made her receptive to the ideas of the Enlightenment at a time when Denmark was one of the more conservative kingdoms in Europe, with politics dominated by puritan clergy. When the personal physician of the king Johann Struensee (the excellent Mads Mikkelsen) gains influence and slowly takes over the affairs of the kingdom the queen will find in him a companion in ideas, and soon also in bed. The period of one year while doctor Struensee led Denmark saw the introduction of a set of the earliest and most radical reformist legislation in Europe. When the king fell completely into folly and the affair between the queen and the prime minister became to visible for the small conservative country, the clergy, nobility and disaffected branch of the royal family plotted to take power, arrested the prime minister, isolated the king and sent the queen into exile. The country reverted for about two decades back into feudalism until the children of the queen (who had died in the meantime) came to power and set the base of modern Denmark.

    'A Royal Affair' enjoys a very careful production, with great attention to details, and is well acted. Best parts are actually the psychological games played by the triangle composed of the king with his insanity combined with childish outbreaks of goodness, of the beautiful and dedicated queen whose trust in good guides her in all deeds except in her private life, and of the charismatic physician who seems to understand well that his path to glory is doomed to end into disgrace at best, and almost certainly into violent death. It is actually the overall production and the careful reconstitution of the life in the North of Europe in the 18th century that is directed with somehow a stiff hand. The historical details may certainly interest and are relevant to the Danes, but less to the viewers who are not so knowledgeable or interested in local history. Although the characters are interesting and the 18th century story is well told, the film lacks exactly that higher dose of personal drama which could have helped him overcome the two 21st century old musicians at their twilight in the race for the Oscars. A little bit of insanity borrowed from the kind could have helped.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    We didn't get too much Danish history at my school nor, I suspect, at most schools in England, so I came to this film more or less ignorant of the facts yet happy to accept that it was based on historical fact. At the beginning there are some stunning visuals that lull the viewer into a pleasant mood but we are soon disabused of the notion that this is yet another chocolate box potted history. After the briefest of sojourns in England we are whisked - along with Caroline, wed to a man she has yet to meet - to a Denmark where the politico/religio axis has the country in a headlock but we are smack dab in the centre of the Age of Enlightenment and things are about to change and then change again. The King - a beautifully judged performance by Mikkel Boe Folsgaard - is little more than an overgrown child with minimal interest in his bride - another fine performance by Alicia Vikander - and the catalyst in the woodpile is not the young Negro boy he treats as a pet so much as the German physician (Mads Mikkelson), a devotee of Rousseau who quickly gains the King's ear and the Queen's bed with the result that soon all three unite in a non-sexual menage a trois and push through several important reforms. It does, of course, end in tears but it also keeps us riveted for some two and a quarter hours. A fine effort.
  • Mikkel Boe Følsgaard as the mad King of Denmark, may not have been given the title role, but he oozes with scene stealing presence in almost every scene he appears. In saying that Danish historical drama "A Royal Affair" is purely carried by Mikkel is by no means an understatement. In fact, the film is rather disappointing with all characters rather blend and uninspiring, apart from the King. Director Nikolaj Arcel (writer of "The Girl with a Dragon Tattoo") is clearly a much better script writer than at bringing the picture to life. "A Royal Affair" could have been something enormous, but rather it all seemed too much like clichés, too many boredom moments and some rather predictable acting from Mads Mikkelsen as the Royal doctor. I am by no means an expert in Danish cinema, but despite looking wonderfully detail in its depiction of 1700s life, the film lacks a vital ingredient of having a heart. There is no doubt that "Royal" is not a bad film and will never be, but one cannot stop wondering what could've been and once again the case of a missed opportunity.

    As mentioned earlier, Mikkel Boe Folsgaard steals the show from far more acclaimed Mikkelsen ("Casino Royale"'s fame) and the Queen played by rising Swedish star Alicia Vikander. Mikkel is able to bring his mad character to life and more importantly a human naturalistic touch to it as well. It is a vital stranglehold that the film ultimately fails miserably at. In saying so, Mads Mikkelsen is extremely disappointing in a role that requires so much more. His stoic outlook and appearance certainly did not help the cause, but what really led him down is his inability to show the conflict between love, power and ideals that his character and the audience needed from him. Although it must be noted that despite the age difference, there is an underlying chemistry between him and Alicia Vikander. Moving on to Vikander, there is no question of her pretty face, but despite a promising start, she is never sure of the character that she is trying so hard to portray. At the end, the audience does not feel for either Vikander and Mikkelsen and while both actors should be blamed, a burden should be attributed to the director Arcel, by not being able to exploit the most at his disposals.

    "A Royal Affair" is really a historical film about a time in the late 1700s when people are starting to challenge the status quo, the introduction of science, questioning of the Church and all of these leading to the times of being in the middle of the age of enlightenment. The famous Royal doctor Johan Struensee is being portrayed as a simple and straightforward idealist guy that bedded a Queen, but rather he is an interesting character that is driven with passion and ideal to change the world and in the midst of things got stuck in an affair with the Queen. However, he is nothing, but a simple character, as he is torn between assuming more and more power as well as his personal drive for ideals. Here, all we see is a simple black and white character where by the end of the film, he seemed more like a villain than a complicated yet flawed character he should have been.

    All in all, "A Royal Affair" is really a missed opportunity. Although it must be admitted, that the screenplay and the best actor award seems thoroughly deserving in winning the Berlin Film Festival awards, but the film precisely fails to deliver in every other category. The film is also a tact too slow in the beginning and lacks tension even in the rather frequent sexual Royal affair. Luckily, the film is saved by the wonderful Mikkel Boe Følsgaard whose character despite being the least normal of the trio, stand heads and shoulders above the rest of the crowd. Perhaps the film-maker was right to focus on the pair of scandalous lovers, after all the film name is titled after it. Still, this could easily be a far better film, far better acted and far more deep and meaning. Perhaps, I am being a tact too harsh, but the result of "A Royal Affair" is not that it is a bad film, but rather it is far too average, far too normal and far too predictable to be involving and affecting. I should be crying by the end of the film, but instead, I almost felt nothing. Beautiful to look at, but ultimately I felt nothing… (Neo 2012)

    I rate it 6/10

    • thehkneo.com
  • "A Royal Affair" is a Danish/Swedish/Czech production about the reign of 18th century King Christian VII of Denmark, his Welsh wife and a German physician whose progressive ideas shake Denmark's conservative ruling class to its foundations. As best I can discern the film tries to keep true to actual history with some embellishments added concerning the role of the Queen in the political machinations along with some reasonable speculation about a possible menage a trois. The screenplay by Nikolaj Arcel and Rasmus Heisterberg does a nice job of capturing the unusual atmosphere of life at a court governed by a mentally unstable monarch who's little more than a nuisance puppet of the nobility and the church. In the middle of all that is the young English Queen trapped in a loveless marriage. She is also disturbed by the unwillingness of her adopted country to accept the ideas of the Enlightenment then circulating around Europe. Under the direction of Nikolaj Arcel "A Royal Affair" is an effective recreation of a bygone age yet one in which we can see our contemporary quagmire between those who advocate change and those condemning it. Mikkel Folsgaard is excellent as the King. He never descends to caricature and is both powerful and pitiable. Mads Mikkelsen is compelling as Dr. Johann Struensee a noble but flawed man given a rare opportunity to improve the lot of the lower classes who are suspicious of him as a foreigner usurping the state. Alicia Vikander is Caroline Mathilde a Welsh princess sent to Denmark in an arranged marriage of noble households with no idea of what's in store for her. This is very good intelligent costume drama that should please fans of the genre. Well worth seeing.
  • There are many films about mad kings. Examples are "Hamlet" (1948, Laurence Oliver), "Ludwig" (1973, Luchino Visconti) and "The madness of King George" (1994, Nicholas Hytner).

    In all the above examples the film is about the decay of the king into madness. In "A royal affair" the king (Christian VII played by Mikkel Boe Folsgaard) is "mad" from the very beginning. Formally he has a lot of power, mentally he does not know what to do with it.

    This situation gives rise to possibilities of manipulation. In the film it is personal physician Johann Friedrich Struensee (Mads Mikkelsen) who takes advantages of these possibilites. At first out of opportunistic motives (the "illness" of the king can't be cured so the job of personal physician is an easy one, but one that gives the oppurtunity to share in all the luxury of the court), later out of idealism (implementing a modern reform programme).

    Formally Stuensee has no power at all. He is always in danger of falling out of the favour of King Christian VII. Making a lot of enemies in higher circles with his reform program, in the second half of the film there are a lot of courtiers all to willing to promote his fall. The film derives a lot of his tension from this situation.

    "A royal affair" is a well made movie.

    It is based on the 1999 novel "The visit of the royal physician" by Per Olov Enquist.

    Mads Mikkelsen gives a very good performance as the royal physician, although in my opinion his performance in "Jagten" (Thomas Vinterberg) from the same year was even beter.

    The cinematography by Rasmus Videbæk is very beautiful and resembles occasionally that in "Barry Lyndon" (1975, Stanley Kubrick). Incidentally in the opportunistic phase the two stories partially coincide. Barry Lyndon manipulates his wife to get access to higer circles.

    Director Nikolaj Arcel seemed well on his way to Hollywood as a result of the success of this film. He did not manage to match this success as a director, but he did manage to do so as a writer, for example with "Riders of justice" (2020, Anders Thomas Jensen), also with Mads Mikkelsen.
  • This was a magnificent film, with stunning performances by the star cast and the supporting roles.

    I am not an unconditional fan of Mads Mikkelsen, but he really was strong and convincing in this role.

    And one could easily forgive the good doctor for falling in love with Queen Caroline, as portrayed by the lovely Alicia Vikander.

    And one even had sympathy for poor old Christian in the end. I was beginning to wonder whether he was quite as insane as people thought him to be. There seemed to be a genuine friendship between him and Dr Struensee also. Had things gone slightly differently, one could have imagined them forming a happy and successful ménage à trois, and living happily ever after.

    And the villains were truly villainous :-)

    (I spotted a few familiar faces from Forbydelsen I and other places, including Søren Malling (Jan Mayer ), and Bent Mejding who was the standing mayor (playing a not dissimilar sort of character)

    A very interesting and surprising historical lesson as well.

    Highly recommended.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    "There's something rotten in the state of Denmark" Marcellus in Shakespeare's Hamlet

    Apparently 18th century Denmark smelled just as bad as it did in that renowned play more than a century before. A Royal Affair, in the Masterpiece Theater tradition, is an engrossing historical drama splendid with period costumes and court intrigue, from adultery to insanity and bad guys everywhere. It's amusing, informative, and long.

    Dr. Johann Friedrich Struensee (Mads Mikkelsen) is a common doc who has the fortune, both good and bad, to become the King of Denmark's personal surgeon, seduce the Brit-born Queen, Caroline Mathilde (Alicia Vikander), and have a child with her. King Christian VII (Mikkel Boe Folsgaard) makes the liaison easy because he's daffy and trusts Johann implicitly. As we have learned from drama and life itself, such shenanigans last only so long and in this case long enough for real good to be done before the heads roll.

    The plot is divided between the love affair and the laws Johann and the Queen get the King to enact before his enemies wise up to the manipulation and the couple's illegitimate daughter. Those laws, in the freedom-resounding spirit of the Enlightenment, are aimed at relieving the poor and spreading equality.

    I would have preferred seeing the results of more legislation like the smallpox vaccinations mandate and less of the romance, but then I am satisfied that the scenes with the King's cabinet (not as impassioned as the legislature in Lincoln) are ample enough to show how it out-maneuvered his highness.

    The acting is first-rate, from Mikkelsen's portrayal of stoic sensuality, a Danish Jefferson if you will, to Vikander's goodness and simplicity. In fact, the two actors, appearing genuinely to like each other, create a believable passion that spawns freedom and King Frederick, who will renew the doctor's good works when he takes the crown.

    Although quite a bit of historical territory is covered in 137 minutes, maybe too much, I came away with a much better understanding of Danish history and the impending French and American revolutions. It's not called "Enlightenment" for nothing!

    "If ignorance and passion are the foes of popular morality, it must be confessed that moral indifference is the malady of the cultivated classes. The modern separation of enlightenment and virtue, of thought and conscience, of the intellectual aristocracy from the honest and common crowd is the greatest danger that can threaten liberty." Henri Frederic Amiel (1821-1881)
  • Set in the 1770s; this costume drama is an amorous return to Danish history marked by the Age of Enlightenment. It explores a scandalous affair between German physician, Johann Friedrich Struensee (Mads Mikkelsen) and the Queen of Denmark, Caroline Mathilde (Alicia Vikander).

    When the main story begins; both protagonists are left-wing progressives living in authoritarian, repressive times that precede the French Revolution.

    As a gesture of political union, young Caroline leaves England to marry King Christian VII of Denmark. But the marriage proves difficult with his mental illness. Soon she resigns to fate, believing her calling in life is reduced to carrying the bloodline for Danish monarch… until Struensee enters the royal scene.

    Emboldened by his adventurous spirit and intellectual views, both Christian and Caroline connect with Struensee—thus setting in motion a chain of reforms that shake the country's cabinet and people. For a brief moment in time, all three are pivotal to radical change including laws that abolish torture and slave trade; initiatives that bring vaccination to the peasants.

    But this film is titled A Royal Affair and let's face it, nothing is hotter than repression and forbidden sex. Struensee is handsome, wild haired, glassy-eyed stallion and Caroline is rosy-cheeked elegance with a twang of defiance. Tender yearning gives way to furtive desires and the place is a tiny room by the back of a hot kitchen.

    But there's a hitch for voyeurs of this salacious affair--beyond being an adulterer himself, Christian (Mikkel Følsgaard in an underrated performance) is actually endearing in some ways. His fondness for Struensee and protectiveness of him in the royal court creates a sympathetic character that makes it difficult for onlookers to turn away.

    In the hands of director Nikolaj Arcel, A Royal Affair recounts one forgotten romance etched in the history of sweeping change inspired by Voltaire and Rousseau. Based on Bodil Steensen-Leth's erotic novel Prinsesse af blodet, this Oscar nominee for Best Foreign Film is an elegant tragedy underscored by human thirst for expression, power, meaning and redemption.

    cinemainterruptus.wordpress.com
  • You can either look at what it is, and what it isn't, and in either case, it's hard not to think of the missed opportunities.

    What it isn't, is an attempt to accurately portray any of the persons, maybe with the exception of the king. They are characters. This goes for any and all "historical" movies, but in this case it's even more obvious, since the main protagonist (Struensee) and the main antagonist (Guldberg), are just that. Protagonist and antagonist, ideal and caricature, white hat, black hat. The reason this is especially disappointing, is that both of them, especially Struensee, were really very interesting humans - faults and all. Whilst the movies purports to feature both English, Danish, German and French, the movie has exactly one line in any of these languages, which is really disappointing, since it would have been interesting to show people the multilingual court of the time. Instead of showing us Struensee and Bernstorff as foreigners, we are merely TOLD that they are.

    What it is, is just a very run-of-the-mill costume drama, with a predictable climax. As I said, the characters are either good or bad. Any and all opportunity of showing inner struggle, for example how Struensee wanted to do good, but ended up grabbing power for himself, is lost. The forbidden romance is simply justified here. The only character to encompass both good and bad is the king himself, swinging from rudeness and lewdness to being adorably naive and brave. It's such a shame that the movie could not have been about him.

    All in all, the movie is wholly unremarkable as far as the story goes, which is really disappointing when you think of the actual story this is based on. I can't help but think: Is this really all they could get from this?
  • Love can lead to transformation yet the force of greed and the lack of political skills can bring anyone down even though you have the best intentions and act for the "greater good".

    It does not happen very often that I come out of the cinema and completely shut up. It didn't feel like I was listening to a non-English dialogue. Danish felt like a familiar language ... and it was beautiful in this movie.

    Though not with splendid clothes like Marie Antoinette, no intense intrigues, no large battle scenes, it was one of the best historic films I have ever seen. Everything was kept "small", yet with so much feeling that I could not take sides with any of the 3 main characters. Fair enough, the greedy and backward upper-class angered me much; just can't stand stupidity, especially when it holds back progress and the aim for improvements.
  • On the surface, this movie is exactly what the title says, you have an unhappily married queen who has an affair under the king's nose with someone in the King's court. However, the interesting aspect of this story is the context. It is the second half of the 18th century, liberal ideals of people like Rousseau and Voltaire spread across Europe, and threatens to break down the old Feudalistic regime.

    The movie is not a documentary on the ruling of Christian the VII, and should not be regarded as such. After seeing it, I went to read about Christian the VII, and found that many details of the era and his regime were omitted in favor of not making a long tiresome movie. Instead the movie focuses on the relationships between the king, the queen and the physician and to their attempt to change the face of Denmark.

    These three characters are played beautifully.

    Mikkel Boe Følsgaard as King Christian is just superb and fun to watch, as a mad king he is always there even when not the focus of the camera.

    Mads Mikkelsen as the physician acts for the most part as a calm yet stern person, however, when he does display emotions it has greater impact, and in my view portraits inner-struggle more effectively.

    Alicia Vikander as the queen plays her two role quite well, whether it is the passion and stress that go with having a secret affair, or the audacity and charm that goes with fulfilling her royal duties.

    Finally, in my view, the movie is another bell ring to remind us that even Denmark, 300 years ago was a country consumed by religion and fear, and that there are always those who believe in such a way of life.
  • dinirex4 April 2012
    This movie is way to focused on the love between the doctor and queen. The movie could easily have been shortened to 1½ hour instead of 2½.

    The acting and the actors are good, no comments there, but the political aspect were nearly nonexistent. We didn't really learn much about the king himself, because the film was so focus on the love affair between the queen and the doctor. Their relationship was a typical Hollywood love story, and I had a hard time connecting with it.

    This movie is a sad and long love story, that is camouflaged by a interesting cover of political affairs in a mad kings life.

    The ending seems to be a "we're out of movie time, lets wrap it up!" kind a thing.
  • Within the last decades, Denmark has become the leading film country around the Baltic Sea, several films have been praised in major festivals around the globe. En kongelig affære is a pleasant supplement to the succession. Based on real events and persons, the film focuses on broader issues than a simple love between 2 powerful persons. Despite some not-so-good characteristic features of the doctor Struensee, his appearance in the Danish royal and executive circles changed the country thoroughly. And today, Denmark is one of the most progressive countries in the whole world.

    The cast is evenly strong - not the leading roles only, but supporting performances as well. Mads Mikkelsen is great as usual, irrespective of the role, but the biggest surprise to me was Mikkel Følsgaard (as Christian VII) - I had never heard about him before; as he managed to win the Silver Bear for Best Actor at the Berlin Film Festival, I am sure he will be used often both in Denmark and internationally.

    Well, the total length could have been less, 2 hour 15 minutes included some protracted scenes. Nevertheless, the film is recommended to all those fond of historical palace dramas.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This is the tragic and romantic story of Danish King Christian VII and his English wife, Caroline. The King was a cruel dolt who made his wife miserable, until she fell in love with his wise and tender doctor. They both believed in modernizing the country and helping the people, especially the serfs.

    What a stunning movie this is. The script is riveting, the actors are uniformly excellent, and the costumes and sets are lavish. It made me want to read the factual story.

    The movie, in Danish with subtitles, was nominated for a Best Foreign Film Oscar. Mads Mikkelsen, the charismatic actor who plays the doctor, is currently playing Hannibal Lecter in the TV series, "Hannibal." Based on his work in this movie, I'll be tuning in to see him on the small screen.
  • proud_luddite25 February 2020
    Based on a true story, this historical drama takes place in Denmark in the 1700s. The mentally disturbed King Christian VII has a personal doctor who manipulates some badly needed reforms in the country while showing a great interest in the king's wife.

    This film is in the genre of beautiful European epics that excel in lighting, music, natural settings, and architectural design. There is also a fine story in the great resistance to the political reforms by stodgy, deceitful bureaucrats who abuse religion in manipulative ways.

    This is all admirable except that there is a feeling this has been done before. "The Other Boleyn Girl" and the recent version of "Anna Karenina" come to mind as examples of royal brutality and upper-class adultery. The history is fascinating but it probably needed a different style to stand out. As it is, it seems it could have been reduced by about twenty minutes.

    An irony is a post-script that explains the history that follows the ending. If this had been included in the film (rather than just a post-script), it might have been a bit more interesting.
  • prada-4 March 2021
    They do it hundred times better than Hollywood. Oscar nominated. I Recommend.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    "En kongelig affære" or "A Royal Affair" is generally seen as a Danish movie, but if we are precise, then it is a co-production between Denmark, Sweden, the Czech Republic and Germany. There are also four languages spoken in here, but the most frequent is Danish of course. This movie premiered back in spring 2012, so it is also already comfortably over a decade old now. It is a pretty long movie at almost two hours and twenty minutes and the director here was Nikolaj Arcel. He is also one of the three writers credited. Another would be Rasmus Heisterberg and this is no coincidence as these two have collaborated on other occasions. Interestingly enough, the duo is not just a director/writer combination, but Arcel has his most credits in writing too and the duo has worked together on screenplays for films where Arcel did not direct like he did this time. Millennium trilogy. Do I need to say more? But today, we talk about this movie here. The third writer is Bodil Steensen-Leth and there is not too much to her body of work. She wrote the novel this is based on and apparently it is her only work that got turned into a movie. Quite a success nonetheless if we look at how big this film here turned out. Interestingly enough, she also has one acting credit on imdb that happened years, actually decades before this film got made. Maybe there are other credits that are just not listed. Imdb is probably not totally spot-on and complete with Danish television. Anyway, if we look at the cast here, we will find quite a few interesting names. It was Alicia Vikander's breakthrough movie and she won the Oscar a few years later for another period piece. Might be her niche. Then again, she is always kinda good. The same can definitely be said about Mads Mikkelsen, one of my favorite actors. He always delivers, no matter if it is a dark crime comedy like the one that he has appeared in not too long ago where he collaborated again with Arcel of if it is a period piece like the one we have here.

    I will not post an in-depth review about all the cast members here, but one more I have to mention and that would be Mikkel Boe Følsgaard. The name probably does not sound familiar right away to most and I do include myself here, but this is really a three-character movie you could say and he held his own very well next to these two big names. Or who are considered big names today if we keep Vikander in mind and she wasn't a big name back then. Mikkelsen was of course already perhaps Denmark's biggest actor at that point. It says a lot that he still returns to his country all the time to shoot new films. This is how good Danish films were back then and still are. Could you imagine Christoph Waltz coming back to Germany? Absolutely not and for good reason. Says a lot that Denmark has been ahead of us for quite some time now in terms of film quality. Sad state of affairs. But I am drifting away. Another thing that can be said about this film is that it received a really great amount of awards recognition all over the world accumulating in the film being nominated in the foreign language category at both the Golden Globes and Academy Awards. It did not win either, but still a huge success, especially because royalty-themed period pieces are nothing you find too often in those foreign language categories. In Denmark itself, it was also pretty triumphant and won so many categories at the national film awards back then, but interestingly enough still came short for the big prize. Maybe they actually did not want a period piece to win. Definitely finished second there though. Oh, by the way, before I get to the story and plot, let me add that Trine Dyrholm is in this film as well. Her body of work is really spectacular.

    To summarize the plot briefly, we have the King of Denmark here and he makes Vikander's character his queen. Gently-speaking, he is not exactly a handsome, nice or likable fella at all and clearly she does not love him. Things get more complicated when the king recruits a new doctor (with a German background) and Vikander's character falls for said doctor and the two are having an affair that stays secret for the most part. So there are no perfect characters in here, they all have their flaws. The two lovebirds get along well for the most part, but there is also tension between them when one of the duo considers leaving the country. All this happens in the face of people related to the king eager to claim the crown for themselves. This results in a great deal of intrigue, especially towards the end. Councils get dissolved and the power keeps switching to others. Near the end, the king has lost almost all of his power because of his mental issues. However, in the second half, he clearly moves away from being an antagonist. He cares for the people of his country and does not want to see them suffer, even if his plans are almost impossible to execute with the money attached to them. The real revelation that he is not a gruesome ruler comes as well when he forgives his doctor for the man's breach of faith linked to the queen. It's something that almost nobody would have forgiven, let alone how he reacts when he realizes who fathered the second child. Or he also did not force the queen to have sex with him ever. There is simply no intercourse as she does not want to. There it becomes obvious who the real villains are. The ending is unhappy in a way with what happens to all three protagonists, but a jump ahead in time showed us the good guys win. Or we were at least supposed to see them as the good guys. This was even harmonic in a unifying way as the female protagonist's two children from different men reunited and collaborated with one of the kids' father, the former king, to reclaim the crown and they succeeded and what followed were years of glory apparently for Denmark. This is what the closing credits tell us.

    Then again, the fate of the protagonists could be predicted to some extent, at least in terms of Mikkelsen's character. He had a conversation with a friend before that and we hear said friend tell him that he does not want to lose his buddy and that he fears that he might lose his head one day. Like literally. Death sentence and executions were still a thing back then. Another indicator was the dead man they find on one occasion and the words we hear when they describe what happened, namely that he was killed by his owner or boss or whatever you want to call him because he was not loyal to him. I don't have the exact words, but this was such an indicator that Mikkelsen's character's affair would become public and he would get executed as a consequence. Well, he did, but still the reasons and motivations behind the killing were different and the one in charge was not the King of Denmark. On the contrary, the king was still convinced that he could make sure that the two friends would not get killed. However, when inside the car, Mikkelsen's character realizes what is actually going on. This was maybe the one moment that showed us how he was definitely to be considered one of the good guys too because he did not tell his friend or anything, which would have made things way worse, but kept his cool in the face of his approaching death. I was still a bit confused by how crazy the crowd went there when the friend is executed and how there was utter silence when Mikkelsen's character was executed. At the same time, the king was hardly anything other than a string puppet. They had him play with his little Black boy and that was it. His initial reaction when he met the boy may have felt a bit bizarre, but it was understandable. I mean there was no internet or television back then and he had never seen a Black human before probably. He maybe found him even a bit cute like an animal at first, so it was not racism by any means. He liked the boy. I would not even want to imagine what kind of politically correct story German filmmakers would have come up with linked to this part of the plot. Destroyed all creativity perhaps. Thanks Denmark!

    I am getting closer to the end of my review, but just a little bit of brainstorming: Of course, there is no denying how charming and pretty Vikander is in this movie. But she also did a lot acting-wise and I liked her mannerisms in the subtle scenes and her obviousness during other moments like when she moves closer to the king during their first evening. I thought for a moment that, after getting up, she might move closer to the other guys there who are described as the king's enemies despite being his family. That would have ruined all her chances though if she wanted to become the queen. She definitely did and her insecurities at the very start are also entertaining to watch. There, she still expected the king to be a great catch, not just in terms of rank. The truth hit her pretty quickly already the moment when he was hiding to surprise her during their first meeting. Or also when a little later he fires the only friend she kinda had inside that gilded cage. This was still when the king could be considered a true antagonist, even if the female protagonist talked about him in a bit of a pitiful manner during a voice-over we hear at the very beginning that was still taken from her final days when she was close to dying. There were no hard feelings from her side. She understood his mental issues. Or at least saw them as mitigating and realized he was not evil. That is it then. There is a lot to discover with this movie. I suggest you go for it. It is surely worth it, even if you do not like the three lead actors as much as I do. Maybe they can win you over with this movie and change your perception. A movie that is overall good with occasional great moments. Surely worth seeing and I also love how the Danish word for "king" is "kong". That is all now, no more monkey business.
  • jasmina-275198 February 2021
    Excellent costume design. Great role of Mads Mikkelsen. The actor we want to see in Hollywood productions
  • Circumstances may change, but love is always the same, regardless of time and space. 

    "Royal Affair" is a compelling story about the madness of a King and his inconsistent behavior during marriage and lack of leadership for his country. It's also a look at how the heart of a woman can be painfully divided between duty and an impossible chance for real happiness in a time when honor and religious views are strict enough to lead a wrongdoer to the gallows. It's quite a long movie, but the development is very well carried out, making it a historical pleasure to watch, for anyone who appreciates the genre.
  • The acting is superb from everyone. Mikkel Boe Følsgaard, Mads Mikkelsen, and Alicia Vikander are all standouts.

    However, I must knock stars for historical inaccuracy. With so much focus on the "affair" they skip over Struensee's actions. He dissolved the council and took advantage of a mentally ill man in the pursuit of social reform. All of that is lost by framing his imprisonment as mainly from the affair and his belief in reform is lost by him reversing the lifting of censorship. Not to mention they the ending more "noble" than it was. The film tries to make a story of power into a story of romance, but even with the great acting I could never forget the truth.
An error has occured. Please try again.