User Reviews (255)

Add a Review

  • Warning: Spoilers
    "Solace" is something of a cross between "Se7en" and "The Silence of the Lambs" but it's sufficiently original, (and very well made), to stand on its own yet for some reason the critics didn't take to it and it was a flop. As with "Silence..." once again Anthony Hopkins, (here he's a psychic), teams up with a female cop, (Abbie Cornish), to catch a serial killer.

    It's all very flashy but it's also quite clever, (if totally daft), and is actually exciting. Best of all it has two outstanding performances. Watching Hopkins is always a pleasure and he's superb here, particularly considering how little 'acting' he has to do. He can give the simplest line reading a depth that isn't there on paper. This might not have been anything more than a money job for Hopkins but boy, is he good. As the serial killer, Collin Farrell doesn't come into the movie until quite late but he's excellent and, like Hopkins, gives the part a lot more than perhaps it deserves. On the other hand, Robert Downey lookalike Jeffrey Dean Morgan as Cornish's partner is a weak link but he's the only one in a fine serial killer flic that has been massively underrated.
  • Honestly, give it a shot. It's a lot better than you are expecting after reading all the bad reviews and the rating it has here on IMDb. The only problem I have with this movie is with the casting.. while Hopkins and Farrell do well, the other two(Abbie Cornish and Jeffrey Dean Morgan) are just rubbish, Abbie in particular was really embarrassing to watch, even though she is good looking, her acting is just excruciatingly bad! Both of them are as convincing as FBI agents as a squirrel. There are a few bad dialogue lines and some clichés but the story is compelling and Hopkins still delivers.

    Other than that, it is an enjoyable and engaging movie.
  • If we could see people's future, I never would have seen this film being so deep.

    Solace focuses on a closed off psychic who helps to find a serial killer, but soon becomes more important to the case than he knows. Anthony Hopkins and Colin Farrell star in this mystery thriller to wow the audience on life and moral behaviour.

    The film gives thrills, action, suspense, and deep thinking to keep the audience 100% focused. We view brilliant camera work and interesting editing sequences to dazzle our eyes. Though I do not promise this film to be the utter best, but completely enjoyable, and a film to spread the word around about.

    The film provides plenty of depth to the characters, and immediately put the audience on their side. Anthony Hopkins is a clever, caring, and intelligent character that gives the film the performance it needed, along with an emotional story as well. However the choice of Colin Farrell for the psychotic free believer, serial killer may not be the perfect decision. Granted Farrell provides plenty of depth and character in his performance, especially presenting great characterisation compared to previous performances, I personally did not see Farrell as the ideal actor for this role.

    I give this film a 7/10, providing you with much more then you first think. This is a film for thrill seekers, and viewers who like to think, but also one to be discussed.
  • The premise where Psychics are helping the police to find killers are a very common thing in movies and TV series and maybe in real life. They won't tell you who the killer is. Just bits and pieces of information, sometimes misleading or misinterpreting.

    The same goes for "Solace" a rather naive supernatural thriller which gains substance and becomes interesting because of the presence of veteran multi-awarded actor Anthony Hopkins. Colin Farrell is also in this but maybe he is miscast.

    The direction and editing might bother some people but I personally found it OK. Lots of digital Effects, slow motions, quick distorted editing, are always a way to present visions or memories, and this movie has plenty.

    One of the problems of "Solace" is that it has a strong statement about a rather delicate matter which I won't reveal because ultimately is the motive of the villain. It's like a moral that forces you to accept it, without expressing the opposite side which is equally strong.

    Overall: You won't waste your time with this one. Is a decent Supernatural Thriller and Anthony Hopkins is effortlessly great. In my opinion though skip the obvious moral, or give it some more thought.
  • theredandwhitekey24 January 2016
    Firstly, I liked this movie very much. What I didn't like were 2 things: the story was a bit lame (the directing makes it unpredictable) but otherwise the story was flatly OK. The second thing: the tempo and the editing were fast as if it were a TV series. Other than that, it was excellent. The mood of the movie with its colors and lenses and frames was different than anything I've seen, as if the director intentionally wanted to give this genre a different approach. Thus the contre point description: it's too fast and too lucid to belong to this genre. That being said, I can reiterate now and say I liked this movie. It worked for me. It's surprisingly haunting, fresh, it doesn't bore you for a second and it keeps building up. Other than the lame story and the fast editing tempo it's a great effort by an amateur genius (the director). It lingers in your mind, the contre point aspect, the score, the script, the performance by the actors. It's really worth a watch.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    In the bonus segment of the DVD of "Solace," the film's producer indicates that this project was fourteen years in the making. It is interesting to learn how much time, money, and care are involved in the production of a feature film.

    "Solace" tells the story of a unique serial killer, whose specialty is taking the lives of individuals with terminal diseases. In his mind, he is doing them a favor by putting them out of their misery. But the "mercy" killings are not due to their own choice to die. Is the killer's thinking twisted, or is he doing them a service?

    Anthony Hopkins leads a terrific cast with Abby Cornish, Jeffrey Dean Morgan, and Collin Farrell providing excellent support. Hopkins plays a retired doctor who is recruited by the FBI in the hunt for the strange serial killer. Hopkins' character is a clairvoyant with gifts of prophecy that do indeed lead the authorities to the murderer.

    But there is a twist in the film in Hopkins' doctor character who may at some level believe in the moral cause of the killer, effectively played by Farrell.

    It is odd that in the bonus track of the DVD, none of the film artists ever raise the moral issues that are at the heart in their film about euthanasia. To listen to the actors and director, this was primarily a film thriller with a splash of the paranormal. While the film itself never took a strong stand on the ethical considerations on euthanasia, it nonetheless allows the thoughtful viewer to consider this vital topic.
  • kosmasp29 May 2016
    The poster is a bit of a give away, but then again, while some may compare this to Seven (and there are similarities mind you), this movie would lose that comparison. Still that doesn't make this a bad movie. It's more than a decent one and that all comes down to Anthony Hopkins and his "rival" (who may that be?), but also the supporting cast. The story is intriguing enough to keep you guessing throughout. Some very interesting ideas as other have stated here as well.

    It may not be able to maintain and contain everything it sets out to do, but that's a tall order to begin with. If you like light entertainment/suspense you can't go wrong with this one. Whether it'll be a movie that sticks with you for years to come is doubtful though
  • Alanjackd28 September 2015
    Take " Dead zone" and " Manhunter" and you have Solace.

    I won't tell you much about the plot but the film is in the title.

    Wasn't entirely sure what I was going to watch because of the trailer but was very pleasantly surprised.

    I left the theatre wondering who was the bad guy...or indeed IF there was a bad guy.Fantastic cinematography and use of special effects with blistering performances all around.

    A number of reviews have mentioned that this copies a lot of genres but for me it nods a wink in homage to psycho-thrillers to which the director obviously adores.

    Absolutely riveting direction takes this from a Sunday matinée to a Saturday night blockbuster which Tony Hopkins comfortably revels in.

    Colin Farrell is superb as the protagonist ( or is he)?

    I challenge you to not enjoy this for what it is.

    Bring on the DVD so I can watch again and sumise!!
  • I don't agree with the bad reviews here, I liked this movie very much. The story keeps your attention focused up to the very end. I loved the filming, the editing and the music. If you like a good old fashioned thriller with surprising twists and an end that makes you think about matters of life and death, this is a film to watch. It has just enough body count, car chase and action to be all throughout interesting, without overdoing violence.

    Anthony Hopkins' performance it stunning. I always enjoy watching him and here he delivers as well as ever. He can tell the story of his character only with the expression of his eyes and the director uses them well. Colin Farrell does a good job, the other characters are OK but not outstanding.
  • "Solace" is a weird but watchable supernatural thriller. The good director and cast and the original storyline are the best this film can offer. Unfortunately the gloomy screenplay is messy and destroys the expectations of this forgettable movie. My vote is six.

    Title (Brazil): "Presságios de um Crime" ("Omens of a Crime")
  • The supernatural element aside, this is a generic and clichéd serial killer chase. The premise boasts interesting ideas but fails to incorporate them in the plot in any way that gives the movie depth. The intrigue of the psychic powers within the film fades as the plot drags towards the finale and the last scene kills it off entirely.

    Anthony Hopkins, Colin Farrell and Abbie Cornish have all proved, the former especially, that they have the ability to carry themselves in a blockbuster - though this film would hardly even qualify as such. Hopkins phones in a performance with small highlights few and far between. Farrell seems to give it his all but shining in a flick filmed so generically that it's almost laughable appears to be a tougher task than he could have anticipated. Cornish is decent but with the exception of a scene designed to pull on the audience's heartstrings has few opportunities to show off what she can do.

    Camera shots float and zoom-in partially making the film feel almost like a spoof of the genre.

    The psychic element does provide some interesting imagery as well as allowing for possible scenarios to be shown to the audience from the perspective of Hopkins and Farrell. However, much of the imagery appears irrelevant and it's inevitable explanation does not justify it's inclusion enough for the audience to have appreciation of it.

    In conclusion, the film is bold to boast an original idea in a time where cinema is dominated by sequels, remakes and reboots. Nonetheless, much of the film reeks of cop drama generalisations alongside an underdeveloped supernatural element. On TV it might be worth a watch but I feel it isn't worth the price of a cinema ticket.
  • Loved the movie, don't go for the 1 star main review...

    I found strange that a movie with this 2 actors would get a so low or medium even score, and decided to watch it (usualy I don't see anything below 6.5)

    The movie is very good and has a strong message behind it, its not that well hidden, you can identify yourself or someone with the pain that goes through the movie. Who thinks this is a horror movie, or a cliché is going for the wrong film.

    Its a story of the "devil's advocate", you will end up having conflicted feelings, hard ones, with some extremes.

    Anyways, without spoiling it, unless your expecting a horror or action blockbuster you should watch this movie.

    Hopkins delivers and Farrel as well, now the woman main actress doesn't reach this 2 great actors, its the only flaw (Sometimes big one) I find in this film.

    Great movie
  • davidgee1 October 2015
    If this reminds you of SILENCE OF THE LAMBS, it's almost certainly meant to. Anthony Hopkins, in creepy (hammy!) near-Hannibal mode, plays a clairvoyant investigator helping the FBI track down a serial killer who - by credibility-stretching coincidence - also happens to be blessed with amazing psychic powers and has a seriously weird motive for his grisly crimes.

    SOLACE was originally pitched as a sequel to SE7EN, we're told, and had major production difficulties. There are echoes of almost all the Hannibal Lecter movies. Abbie Cornish's FBI agent never escapes from the shadow of Jodie Foster's Clarice Starling. Colin Farrell is, as ever, a charismatic presence, although he is playing a character the script does not make remotely believable. We see too many of Hopkins's 'visions' of how things may (or may not) be about to turn out. Nowhere near as grim and atmospheric as SE7EN, SOLACE is more than a little daft - but despite muddled direction it's still gripping and at least as watchable as a 'vintage' episode of CSI.
  • mattbaxter7229 September 2015
    Warning: Spoilers
    This is a direct-to-DVD movie, which has inexplicably attracted a couple of big stars, but that shouldn't obscure the fact that Zalman King was knocking out stuff like this back in the 80's. At least those movies had boobs to distract you from the ridiculous plot: this thing can only offer Anthony Hopkins' weird hairdo.

    Hopkins, in one of his more restrained performances of late, is a psychic who can see people's futures by touching them. Meanwhile Colin Farrell is the killer he's tracking, who's always one step ahead because - gasp - he's psychic too! Sounds like some cheesy fun, right? Except someone decided that this was a Serious Film, dealing with Big Ideas about morality and justice and destiny and fate and stuff, and so everyone looks really dour all the time, no one has any fun, and by my count at least four people get cancer. I'm pretty sure there were less cancer patients in The Fault In Our Stars. And more jokes.

    Hopkins and Farrell do their best here, Jeffrey Dean Morgan sleepwalks through it and Abbie Cornish... well, she looks pretty I guess, though to be fair Meryl Streep would have struggled with such a cliché-ridden character, a classic example of a female character written by a man who apparently has never met any real, live women.

    The real villain here, though, far worse than Farrell's murderer, is the director. He uses hand-held cameras for no reason, and does so incredibly ineptly, to the extent that I was all but shouting at him to hold the bloody thing still, already. He uses clunky flashbacks and awful symbolism, inserts rubbish montages for no particular reason, and at one point has 77-year-old Anthony Hopkins enact a sequence that looks as though it could be the video to 'Boulevard of Broken Dreams'. In the end, it's only the director's staggering incompetence that you'll remember about this tosh when you catch it on late-night cable in a couple of years' time.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Anthony Hopkins, Jeffery Dean Morgan, Colin Farrell and the lovely twist at the end save this movie from oblivion, which is a shame considering the theme is so topical and controversial.

    The major drawback is there is no character depth. Jeffery Dean Morgan has, by far, the advantage of portraying a detective with something to work with, but Farrell and Hopkins strive to get to grips with their characters as there is no real meat on the bones. Dare I say, lesser accomplished actors would have failed completely, therefore kudos to Mr Farrell and Mr Hopkins. Nevertheless the story line fades into a chase movie, when it could have been so much more.

    The issue of psychics is a delicate one, but neatly handled, and the question arises: what would you do, given the same power of foresight?

    To the director's credit, this movie does rise above the usual police procedural and is worth a watch, but be prepared to feel a little disappointed, despite the twist at the end.
  • jpcjcpd27 January 2019
    I wasn't sure what to make of it based on the review score. Lately, I'm finding that the reviews are becoming less reliable and more fringe opinion.

    This movie presents an interesting concept and a troubling moral dilemma. I found it to be well acted (with the exception of the female detective) and fairly well written. I enjoyed the concept of multiple outcomes based on the "butterfly effect" and how they were presented.

    Giving bad reviews based on it being written by a man (yes there are a few) or similar nonsense is just wasteful. Overall, it was an interesting watch that left me thinking and somewhat troubled - that's the best kind of movie.
  • Nuno_Pessoa21 February 2021
    Good story, could be a good thriller, but it's not. There are moments in the movie that it sounds and resembles more of a CSI / Tv show / B rate action movie Psychic powers mixed with some sort of telepathic comunication between mediums?! Good story, not the best acting due to some bad lines on the script, movie gets saved, of course, by Hopkins and in some way by Farrell. Really bad soundtrack. Rewrite the story, get Hopkins on board, choose a new director.
  • When I first seen this on the shelf at my library, I thought it looks pretty good. When I seen this I thought this is a damn good movie with a good story and really good performances.

    The film is basically your typical serial killer goes on a rampage and FBI agents must stop him formula, but this film is refreshingly done with great twists and takes interesting turns along the way.

    The performances from Anthony Hopkins, Colin Farrell, Jefferey Dean Morgan and Abbie Cornish were very good, everyone brought their A-game in this. Jefferey and Abbie play FBI agents and Anthony is a doctor who is physic who from what I can tell, is a cop, and the FBI uses him from time to time on really difficult cases. On this case, the killer there after is just like Anthony's character, a physic ,and has them follow his bazaar riddles and clues, which is really cool.

    I know it won't happen but I kinda want to see a sequel to this because the concept is fresh, this film could be a franchise. Originally this was the sequel to Seven that started Morgan Freeman and Brad Pitt but was changed to this instead, I think at the time New Line Cinema didn't like it or it never got of the ground, but I'm glad it was rescued and made as this instead. Besides Seven is very hard to franchise if you think about it.

    The action scenes are good and the story is cool it's one of these edge of your seat kinda flicks, with a great ending that I will not spoil.

    I give it a 7/10. A good movie that I can't recommend enough to you. See it.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Interesting concept for a serial murder mystery. The plot becomes provocative when Charles Ambrose (Colin Farrell) unexpectedly faces Dr. John Clancy (Anthony Hopkins) and explains his motivation for killing people with either a known or yet undetected fatal disease. But the bigger twist occurs later when Ambrose reveals he's dying too, and wants Clancy to be his successor in the mercy killing business. The kicker to all this is that both men have psychic abilities, with Ambrose one step ahead of Clancy at nearly every turn. If the filmmakers hadn't inserted a mid film scene of Clancy at his dying daughter's bedside, it would have made the closing scene a bit more shocking. Disparate elements introduced in the story like the frogs and the Atticus newsstand eventually come together, with competing but not necessarily accurate visions of future events creating the tension that propel it forward. I thought this was a good one, certainly better than the current 6.4 IMDb rating it has currently has (as I write this). Farrell made his character sound almost reasonable, and Hopkins, well, what can you say? His understated performance carried a stern gravitas throughout the entire picture.
  • It's hard to believe than an interesting idea with such a casting for the main roles can end up being such a mediocre movie.

    The script is not great, it definitely has its flaws, but what really bothered me is the camera work and cinematography. It really makes this movie look cheap. Even though there is a decent budget (big actors, cars being destroyed..), the style is completely absent. The shaky camera and quick zooms look horrible and distracting in this kind of movie, it's like the director made a couple of action movies and didn't know how to film this. It's a very dark story, with very dark characters and dialogs, but the visual mood tells a completely different story, and if you're aware of this aspect of a movie, it will definitely spoil this one like it happened to me.

    Another big annoyance was the character Joe (J. D. Morgan), which was supposed to be a burned down cop with a big mess on his hands, but then he walks around with a gentle smile, being cool and nice and sharing some lovely scenes with his happy family. I actually like the actor, but it seems that he wasn't really guided into the character. Complete kill of mood. There were lots of moments where the characters kind of lose the touch with the nature of the story and I found that very distracting. This was supposed to be a sequel for Se7en. Compare it with that and you'll see exactly what I mean.

    I'm sure lots of people will find this movie good, watchable. I feel like it had the potential to be way better, but the director failed to set the mood right.

    I'm actually glad they didn't make this into a sequel for Se7en.
  • This movie is like something produced by LivingTV. It's character development is very sketchy and poor. The editing flits about like a music disjointed video with poor music for effect. The video editing similarly is bad and panders to shots of the female lead's boobs and bum. She, by the way, is poor and very two dimensional - as is the script. And it under employs actors actually acting in favour of poorly written, directed and filmed throwaway mono/dialogue set pieces that stretch out instead of knitting the story together. Very poor. Avoid this unless you feel like taking an uncalled for beating.
  • I didn't expect much from this film, owing to the reviews on here, but I really enjoyed it. Mind you, what's not to love when Anthony Hopkins is involved? Ostensibly just another serial killer film, but this is a serial killer with a difference and it actually raises a modern dilemma. The action is good, Anthony Hopkins is brilliant, as always, and there is a twist at the end. One reviewer said that the guy who directed/produced this film was churning out stuff like this in the 80s and gave it a low rating, but I am just an ordinary mortal who doesn't have a clue who directed/produced it and just enjoys a good story, and I thought it was a cracking film.
  • After a dreadful Summer, this reviewer is willing to watch any half- decent film, if the trailer appeals. Sadly, the trailer for this film showed too much. As did the film. The camera was constantly spinning and swinging, thus spoiling viewing. The movie was filmed like a cheap horror movie that viewers may see on late-night cable channels. It is without doubt the worst-filmed movie that I have ever seen in a cinema.

    As story opens, we realize a killer is loose. As the trailer shows, the gimmick of this film is that Anthony Hopkins, who played Dr Hannibal Lecter, (Hannibal the Cannibal), in 'The Silence of the Lambs' (1991), here is playing a good guy. The other gimmick, is that both he, and the killer, have ESP. This was a good premise, but the film played out as a rather predictable, and derivative, by the numbers story.

    'Solace' has a UK rating of 15, and the horror-style of filming, had the audience gasping at some of the more gory scenes. Further gasps were caused by a couple of clever twists. Sadly, much more was rather predictable. One highlight of the film was the choice of music. The choice of music early on in the film is sublime. Firstly, when Anthony Hopkins, in the country, starts taking an interest in the case, and secondly, when he is walking along the street after arriving in the city. Other music also adds to the excitement in scenes throughout the film.

    Jeffrey Dean Morgan and Abbie Cornish play FBI Agents trying to track down the killer. Mr Morgan recently played a horrible and memorable villain in the Western 'The Salvation' (2014). Both Mr Morgan and Miss Cornish have emotional scenes, which they play well. Kenny Johnson, familiar from 'The Shield' TV series, (2002-2006), is also good in a small part.

    Director Afonso Poyart must take the blame for this badly filmed movie. There are car-chases with takes so fast that they are like a blur, and the viewer has no real idea what is happening. Overall, the movie is filmed like a cheap horror movie. There are one or two clever flourishes, but on the whole, it is just uncomfortable viewing.

    The film does raise an interesting moral question but it never answers it. The subject-matter actually leaves a bit of a sour taste in the mouth. The story was written by Ted Griffin and the screenplay by Sean Bailey. Both Mr Bailey and Sir Anthony Hopkins were Executive Producers. As said, the interesting opening premise, sadly does not live up to it's promise.

    No doubt, there may be some who have taken drugs, who will enjoy the spinning camera work. For others though, they may wish the drugs they took were travel-sickness pills, or maybe just took a sick-bag. Those familiar with Director Paul Greengrass's 'Captain Phillips' (2013), and Director Anton Corbijn's 'A Most Wanted Man' (2014), are warned that this film 'Solace' is a much more badly filmed movie. 6/10.
  • baharuka10 January 2016
    Anthony Hopkins plays a role only Anthony Hopkins could play! His psychic character with a medical background will be unforgettable for me. The age of the character, his calmness clashing with restlessness, I just loved it! I also loved Jeffrey Dean Morgan as the detective, especially his ending performance, and Abbie Cornish in her role.

    What I care about most in this type of movie is that you should get a feeling of you've known the characters and Solace pulled that off. The plot does have some unoriginal elements which oddly didn't disturb me and some details I'm actually not used to seeing in such movies. The story pulled me in and made me think, especially because of a condition that I have. You would think about life, death, and choices in an interesting way, supported by a soundtrack which was great in my opinion.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    The screenplay for "Solace" became a stand-alone movie after it was reject by David Fincher as a proposed sequel to "Se7en", called "Ei8ht" (is out there a more ridiculous / forced title for a sequel ?).

    Well, Sir Anthony Hopkins, unfortunately, stopped cared or he's becoming senile to executive produce such a far-fetched & implausible script that could have been an acceptable B-movie, if it wasn't directed in a serious tone like if this rookie director would think he was making a new "Se7en" or "The Silence of the Lambs" for the 'millennials' standards.

    I don't know why in the hell Hollywood is still hiring those Brazilian directors and give them millions to helm a big studio's production like this. José Padilha killed the "RoboCop" franchise with the atrocious remake, and now Afonso Poyart delivers one of the worst psychological thrillers ever produced.

    The direction is so damn 'flashy'; it lacks tension and atmosphere required for such a mystery / thriller film; the composition of shots is nothing sort of spectacular, even if the director is trying too hard, visually, to innovate the genre. The camera tricks added in post production became so repetitive & annoying that it looked like we're watching a cartoon-ish or a sci-fi / superhero movie shot in "The Matrix" style.

    The supporting cast delivers terrible performances, Abbie Cornish can't act as a F.B.I. Special Agent even if she was possessed by one, and not because of her Barbie looks, just check the "Criminal Minds" T.V. Show and the actresses play their parts with much more authenticity. I don't know if Jeffrey Dean Morgan was jinxed or is just because his acting skills are limited and he just can't lead a film. On this account, for every theatrical released movie he was in, it's either from terrible to utter crap or a box office flop. He needs to stuck on TV Shows such as "Supernatural" & "Walking Dead" and quit cinema for once.

    The only positive thing about this mess of a movie were the performances from both Anthony Hopkins and Colin Farrell that always delivered the goods in every role they were in. Hopkins is so typecast in this particular parts that he can do it with charm & confidence, even in his sleep and Farrell is convincing & leave a mark in the film, besides his limited 'less than 20 minutes" screen time as the morose serial-killer. Their scenes together were very good and both have great chemistry on-screen that deserved a way better movie.

    Verdict: as a psychological thriller it fails in every department: it takes itself too seriously; the screenplay is full of bad written dialogue delivered even worse and the premise is risible to say the least, it earns maybe 2 extra points for the performances of the two protagonists.
An error has occured. Please try again.