Vampegeddon (2010 Video) User Reviews (10)

Just Say No

[paul_d_day · 3/10 · 21 October 2012]

"I want mooooooore/Get on the floooooooor"

I considered just using the above lyrics as the full review for this horrible, horrible movie. They embody the lame, triteness and utter incompetence of it. I gave this movie a 3 to dissuade people from watching it as a good/bad movie. It's just flat out bad without the benefit ironic grins to save it.

I'll frequently get movies based on titles alone. It's a crap shoot. "The Nude Vampire" paid off. "Vampegeddon" came up snake eyes. This movie disappoints at every frame from the overly long and confusing pre- credit sequence in which the dialogue sounds dubbed to forced attempts at humor. Rather than characters, you get stereotypes of stereotypes including what I guess was meant to be a nod to Jay and Silent Bob...except Silent Bob won't shut up. Apparently, unless you're the head vampire, you're either retarded or can't find your inhaler which causes your to hyperventilate.

Here's the thing - The head vampire needs teens to call him forth yet they're given the means to do it by...another vampire. Plot point hole, meet Mac Truck.

This genre depends on suspending your disbelief. Or great special effects. Or lots of sex and flesh. None of that is here.

That said, you have to have a certain amount of admiration for someone that actually makes a movie, no matter how horrible it is.

YIKES!!!

[davepolain64 · 3/10 · 20 March 2021]

Well.... errrmmm..... what can one say.

Pretty unwatchable movie, made so by the worst sound design/ sound editing in any motion picture EVER, and the worst music soundtrack in a film since music soundtracks were invented. Appalling choices make this ordinary movie unwatchable. If it ended well, please let me know and I'll watch the last 20 minutes.

Bottom-of-the-barrel filmmaking, but great metal soundtrack by CORVUS

[Wuchakk · 2/10 · 18 May 2015]

Released to video in 2010, "Vampegeddon" is raunchy exploitation trash about vampires and youths in the Arizona desert, including a lesbo vamp. If your dark side thinks that makes it worth seeing, think again. The non-special effects are limited to monster make-up that makes the vampires look like Uncle Fester. It comes across as a student film and should've never been released to video -- yes, the filmmaking is THAT bad. The only positives are one or two curvy girls and a great underground metal soundtrack by Glendale, Arizona's Corvus (not to be confused with Germany's Corvus Corax). Corvus is an extremely talented band that successfully mixes styles. They're outstanding. At least the creators did something right.

The "film" was shot in Arizona and runs (mercifully) 76 minutes.

GRADE: D- (but the soundtrack by Corvus rates a solid A)

This a very average addition to the horror genre that's worth watching once

[kevin_robbins · 5/10 · 2 October 2022]

Vampegeddon (2010) is a movie that I watched on Tubi last month. The storyline follows a vampire and vampire hunter who killed each other in the American Midwest desert. A hundred years later a young lady obsessed with becoming a vampire conducts regular seances and rituals trying to become one. When she does a ritual on the 100 year anniversary of the death of Vampire Lord Giovanni she may get her wish.

This movie is directed by Jeffrey Alan Miller in his directorial debut and stars Katherine Von Forelle (Red Corvette), Jimmy Flowers (Piranha 3D), David C. Hayes(Bloody Bloody Bible Camp) and Michael C. Alvarez (Expo).

This is not a good movie but Katherine Von Forelle gives her everything. Katherine Von Forelle's transformation scene was entertaining and the blond in this is a smoke show. The makeup and costumes were below average but there is some random nudity and lesbian sex scenes. The soundtrack seemed forced but wasn't bad. There are some scenes that feel low budget, like the entire flashback and first vampire attack; but there were some sequences I thought were fun like the garage sale kill and "give me more" scene.

Overall, this is a very average addition to the horror genre that's worth watching once. I would score this a 5/10.

Worst Vampire Movie I've Ever Seen

[mariajonasfahlsing · 1/10 · 8 January 2013]

Whoever edited this movie missed a lot of con trails in the sky. You know, from airplanes which did not exist in the old west. Yeah....

The Indian girl at the campfire is wearing a gold chain. Indians did not wear gold or work with precious metals. Also, the blankets laid by the fire are Mexican style, not Native American.

Seriously, heavy metal juxtaposed with the old west does NOT jive. It's just jarring and off-putting.

The foley artist and sound mixer made the fire sound too windy and loud.

Igor, from the Frankenstein lore, is actually a Nosferatu-esque vampire? WTF?! Wow, really bad makeup work, overacting, melodrama, and horrible fight choreography on top of even more modern music that adds nothing to the scene.

I'm only 9 minutes into this film and I already hate it.

Then, suddenly a quartet of middle-age goths of various types appear and we're in modern day.

Gratuitous female boob shots (one from far away, one close up of surgically enhanced chest cantaloupes).

Yeah, because all goths believe in Wicca, vampires, and play D&D. NOT! Oh, and it's painfully obvious that they were holding small blood packets in their palms that they pierced with the dagger. Bad attempt to conceal prop blood. Had it been actual blood, drinking it would likely make them vomit. The human stomach does not tolerate blood very well at all.

So, why is the redhead immediately drawn into some strange guy's house to buy stuff? Why is that not creepy to her? Especially when he starts rubbing his enormous gut in an oddly sexual manner. Then Fatty McFatterson is surrounded by four naked vampires flashing their boobs and draining him dry. Yeah, that was the weirdest garage sale EVER!

How many sets of breasts will you see in this movie? A whopping seven!

The foley track has no sounds other than the characters' voices most of the time. No footsteps, gravel, birds chirping, dogs barking, neighborhood or traffic sounds, etc. It's eerie.

During the campfire scene's circle kiss, you can clearly see a cameraman's shadow on the rocks.

How can vampires feed without dripping blood everywhere and making a huge mess? They can't. Yet, the redhead feeds on the Nosferatu dude with no bloody lips or drips.

Why would a vampire with sharp canines need to wear and/or use a bloodletter? That's what his teeth are for, duh!

So, Liz has been possessed by a spirit, but the accent slips from an unknown British dialect to sounding more Aussie or Kiwi.

The big guy would not still be flailing with his hands after being decapitated. He should have gone down immediately. Also, the skinny guy must be really, really high to think getting doused in his buddy's blood is funny or cool.

Always, always, always put out your campfire and make sure it poses no danger before leaving.

If you stake a guy in the heart, the stake will NOT be pulled out clean and completely devoid of blood. Seriously, how many more mistakes does this movie have?

Since when do vampires and pentagrams go together? What is going on here?

The vampires' palms are normal skin color. Makeup fail.

The director is super seriously into boobs. We get to see a pair every 10 minutes or so. As a woman watching this movie, it's really annoying at this point, because it doesn't drive the plot and is completely unnecessary.

Redhead wakes up suddenly, screams, and passes back out. What was the point of that?

Once again, when you stake a vampire, the tip should come out covered in gore. Also, slamming two car doors makes no noise at all? How did she know where the keys were? How was it suddenly morning (even though that is really a sunset)? Mistake after mistake after mistake. Worst editor ever?

Wow, that was terrible.

Why would anyone watch this?

[Agent10 · 1/10 · 18 July 2021]

If you are a person that seeks to be tortured by the never ending selection of horrible vampire movies, then avoid this one. That's right, this movie is barely a movie and the quality of your time should be spent in other ventures. Now you ask why I said don't watch it...and it's because there is nothing fun or interesting or even funny-bad about this film. It's just crummy.

Where to begin? The sound is awful, the acting is brutal, and the costumes are even worse. I mean, you can at least blow your budget on that. Right? Either way, it makes one wonder why these type of films keep getting made, and it's because it is perfect wank material for young boys who have limited internet access. And to put it honestly, the film might have been written by a pre-teen boy. However, it was written by a dumpy 40-year old who got to play out a fetish fantasy in the early stages of this film (you will know which one).

Don't watch this movie unless you are a teen boy that has limited internet access. At least the women were fairly attractive.

Is there anything that isn't bad about this movie?

[TheLittleSongbird · 1/10 · 24 October 2012]

After about 30 seconds thought, I immediately concluded, no! I saw Vampegeddon out of curiosity and I do like vampire and horror movies. But nothing about Vampegeddon worked, it really is one of the worst of its kind.

Where to begin with perhaps my mini-novel on why Vampegeddon stank as badly as it did? Let's start with the technical values. If there is a word to best describe the technical side of Vampegeddon, amateurish would come to mind in an instant, and I assure you that is being generous. The scenery is the least of the problems in this regard as it wasn't that bad. The sad thing is, that that is little consolation as you couldn't enjoy it. The editing was a large problem of why, it is extremely sloppy and has the feel of playing time in (very) slow-motion. The sloppiness of the editing not only cheapens the film but severely undermines any suspense, tension or scare-factor levels Vampegeddon aimed to have. The effects are slipshod at best, looking as if the makers were aiming for quantity rather than quality. There is a lesson to be learnt, sometimes less is more. And then there is the make-up, which is appalling, I've rarely seen make-up this bad actually with the vampires looking like bad Uncle Fester clones, and the clichéd costumes evoked the very same reaction.

Even with bad production values, you'd hope that there'd be redeeming qualities elsewhere. Sadly, that was not the case with Vampegeddon. Music has always been a big part of my life and I love it in films when it is good. The music however here is one of many disasters with Vampegeddon, it is not only generic and over-bearing but it didn't fit the tone of the movie at all and this really takes away from any atmosphere. This said, there isn't much of an atmosphere here in the first place. The gore is really artificial, blood for instance could easily have been tomato ketchup or something, and the gore is used in a very unimaginative way. Come to think of it, there are also no scares, excitement or thrills, the killings left me bored out of mind in alternative to biting my nails.

Instead it is replaced by many other things that should fill a book titled "100 Ways in NOT to make a film". I cannot count the number of times I was rolling my eyes at the sheer idiocy of the dialogue. Lines like "they're (insert obscenity) maniacs" and "and lesbians too" are enough to numb the mind. Vampegeddon is only about an hour and a quarter, but watching it you could have sworn it was longer. And that is entirely because of the story, and the fact that it is unoriginal is not the problem. Everything feels so clumsy, too random and as a matter too paper-thin to be counted as predictable. The garage sale seemed to be there for no reason, there are people that wander in and out of the story, often for no reason, and there are things like Melissa saying that she needs to become a vampire that are given no explanation. The fight sequences are more slapstick comedy than anything else, and made even worse by the editing.

If you are looking for any likable characters, I'd suggest you look elsewhere. There isn't an ounce of likability in any of these characters, they are both stock and insufferably annoying. Melissa is the absolute worst, even in her very first scene you already can't stand the sight of her. And need I mention that they are stereotypical as well, that mayn't be so bad but it's the way these stereotypes are treated in Vampegeddon that are going to infuriate people. This is particularly true with Goths being portrayed as naive and dumb. And to put the final nail in the coffin(pun intended) the acting- and direction for that matter- is so terrible that you'd call it non-existent. Jacqueline Smith as Liz is the least bad, she is somewhat tolerable, but that's it. Everybody else, especially the actors of Melissa, Giovanni and Igor, is hilariously bad.

Overall, there isn't anything that isn't bad about Vampegeddon, it is one gigantic mess through and through. 0/10 Bethany Cox

Nice Indie Vampire movie.. Don't miss climax scene..

[brooklyn-de-106-924826 · 9/10 · 27 January 2023]

The title of this Indie vampire movie is very interesting. I started watching and after few minutes I decided to stop it but the sizzling scenes with big breasts actresses kept me active till end of this movie. Thank God.. the director knows what we expect from the vampire movie. This movie has all the flavors. All stars did great performance. Don't miss the climax scene of this movie. Fatty big tit actress Katherine won't let you to go away.

++ of this movie (1) Camera & location (2) Costumes and appearance of the actress (3) Climax possession scene. Wow!!! Don't miss it.

-- of this movie (1) limited characters (2) Missing comedy

My rating is 9 for Katherine. I would go rating 10 if she is full nude in the movie sequel :)

"You finally have me where you want me Longshank.. but you dont have the wood.."

[warehousereviews · 7/10 · 18 September 2020]

Could be the greatest Vampire movie ever made. The cast was impeccable, the blood, the boob, the banging soundtrack, the fight scenes.. The only minor flaw was the age they were trying to portray.. The dialogue was realistic and did not sound dubbed at all.. Jacqueline Smith did a mind-blowing job with her accents.. I'm not sure which one was really hers.. Loved Igor.. was just a likable character.

Enjoyable if flawed indie vampire effort

[kannibalcorpsegrinder · 7/10 · 23 October 2020]

Desperate to leave her small-town, a woman and her friends attempt to revive a long-dead vampire master for fun and games, but when they realize the spell has become real and the vampire chooses her as a new bride the spirit of the vampire hunter that killed him arrives to save her.

This one wasn't too bad of an effort. One of the film's best aspects is the way in which this one manages to keep the action going so there's always something going on. That the opening attack on the vampire in the past which details the reasoning for the haunted backstory of the locale shows the attacks with plenty of action and fun indie effects. The resurrection ceremony they perform in the desert has some fantastic cheesy ritualistic actions that spell the ceremony is working as they carry on. With the cutaways to his seduction of the girls in their nightgowns that go along with their continued prayers, there's a great injection of attitude that carries over into the battles between the now possessed hunter and the vampires attempting to take the one girl back to the vampire as the ceremony takes place. The other enjoyable feature here is the setup that gives the action some fine grounding in some logical reasoning. The amount of work here to showcase the homelife to turn her into the dark arts, with the abusive situation there, inattentive parents dealing with their own issues instead of her and hanging out with the Goth friends around the school is all wrapped together to paint a solid picture is why she feels the need to partake in these rituals. Alongside the nudity and some fine gore, there's a lot to really like here. There are a few flaws to be had in the film. The main problem is the wholly underwhelming low-budget tone which carries itself on through much of the running time. The low-budget look of the whole town they live in, the guerilla look of their scenes meeting up together and the general indie vibe throughout here with scenes that serve no purpose only to get their friends on-screen come through readily as there's very little to break up that tone which is a huge distraction. The other issue here is the lead vampire who carries the air of a cosplayer assuming the role of a vaguely European vampire, given his penchant for pseudo-intellectual gibberish masquerading as a regal class and the propensity for hilarious gesticulating during seduction scenes. These end up making him seem like a goofy hindrance than an actual threat and are what really hold this one back.

Rated R: Graphic Violence, Graphic Language and Nudity.