History of Evil

This movie made No sense. Absolutely no sense at all. There was no flow to it. Nothing scary, nothing mind bending, nothing that made you think. It was just a bunch of jumbled confusing nonsense.

I found myself fast forwarding all parts that had no spoken dialogue (which made no difference cause it was all so slow and boring, and nothing made any sense.) Can't believe two good actors - one from vampire diaries and one from Orange is the New Black - actually agreed to be in this pile of hot garbage.

It was comical putting your hand on a picture of a bible on an iPad. Lol. What was that !?

It was a poor cliche mix of a wanna be future apocalypse that I still don't understand any part of.

Why was the female a wanted fugitive? Why was she being hunted ? Why was the house they squatted in supposed to be scary?

I'm a big horror fan - so listen to me when I tell u-- MOVE ON-- SKIP this !!! It was not horror, not thriller , it was annoyingly stupid and boring., and a waste of time.

Living in a dystopian society, a group of refugees trying to hide out from the totalitarian government trailing them manage to seek shelter at a remote house in the wilderness until they can complete the next step of their escape, but when they come under the houses' grisly history must try to stop it from spreading.

This was a mildly disappointing if somewhat still enjoyable genre effort. One of the better elements here is the solid starting point to everything which manages to provide some rather intriguing starting point to everything. The main setup of the totalitarian state that's found here with just enough of a preamble to get an idea of the type of setup at play here and the need for the secrecy in their operation to the safe house and the concurrent dangers that are in place with staying there. That's given quite a fine balance with the qualities involving how they're trying to remain out of sight of the authorities as they wait for the pick-up to get them to safety which is a great enough touch to be had even without the introduction of the supernatural qualities. It's the introduction of the supernatural qualities that tends to show where the film starts wavering from what it really wants to be. The idea of the house being haunted and the father coming under the spell of the ghost involved in the house' history that starts to bring about a strong series of scenes featuring his behavior change in front of others white staying there, but this just turns into a colossal bore with hardly any kind of rational build-up for what's going on or why no one seems to notice the change. This leads to a decreased sense of terror involving the ghost who is much more hands-on and noncommittal to doing anything as the majority of the scenes consist of horribly-misguided advice and logic that doesn't come off in the least bit frightening, much less worthy of being followed. This type of identity crisis is what's the biggest issue facing this one overall.

Rated Unrated/R: Graphic Language and Violence.

I have to preface this by saying I'm not the biggest horror movie fan. However, I really wanted to give this one a shot. While the atmosphere is quite intense throughout the movie and the plot moves reasonably fast, there were some big flaws with the characters.

The couple has barely any chemistry even in the beginning of the movie and the mother seems quite uninterested in her daughter. Therefore, it's really hard to be invested in their story, feel sorry for them or root for any of them.

The movie had potential, but it was executed quite poorly. Even so, it's not the worst movie out there and if you really just want to watch something I say you can give it a try.

When I stumbled upon this 2024 movie from writer and director Bo Mirhosseni, I had never actually heard about it. But that hardly mattered, as it being a movie that I hadn't already seen was sufficient enough to make me opt to sit down and watch it. And thus, I had zero idea what I was in for.

It was a little bit difficult to delve into the storyline and concept of the movie, because there simply wasn't sufficient information to make it believable. So it was not an easy movie to enjoy. The whole thing about some resistance fighting against a nation-wide regime just never came off as being believable at any point throughout the course of the 98 minutes that the movie ran for.

The movie is listed as a horror/thriller, but it was a pretty weak one at that. Perhaps if you are a newcomer to the horror and thriller genres, then the movie might actually come off as being either of the two, if not actually both. But for a life-long horror fan, then "History of Evil" just didn't cut it.

I actually wasn't familiar with the cast ensemble in the movie, aside from Thomas Francis Murphy, but they did have a good ensemble of talents put together to portray the characters and bring the story to life on the screen. The acting performances were good.

"History of Evil" was by no means a movie that captured my interest, much less provided me with much of any entertainment. And truth be told, I gave up on the ordeal 52 minutes into the movie. I just couldn't take much more of the boredom by then. This is definitely not a movie that I will return to attempt finish watching. Nor is it a movie that I would recommend for horror or thriller fans.

My rating of "History of Evil" lands on a three out of ten stars.

This movie has no idea what it wants to be. A horror movie? A political thriller? Dystopian post-civil war thing? It never really grasped on to any idea and ran with it. It alludes to some much stuff that it makes you wonder what the actual story is. It's not scary, it's not thought provoking, it doesn't advance any political ideology, it really doesn't do anything. 97 minutes and it turns out, the real villian was inside the whole time? I don't know. Is it just a mash up of all the stories that got pitched to the production company that month? Was this a dare that someone put way too much money into? I don't know and I doubt anyone who worked on this film in any shape or form knows either.