User Reviews (77)

Add a Review

  • Warning: Spoilers
    When I first visited Mexico in the late 1960's these events were still spoken of in hushed tones if spoken of at all. It was counseled as healthier never to bring them up as the political descendants of those responsible were still in power and very easily riled. Now they're all dead and we can go see a movie right here in Mexico about what had been erased from the history books for almost 90 years. If only for that reason it's worth seeing, but it has plenty more to offer.

    The film is entertaining, the cast mostly up to the task, and the director brings it all off with a few rough edges, tho' they aren't enough to get in the way of enjoying the film. Here and there sufficient historical data is presented (the locations and the sets & wardrobe are all 1st rate) to give the audience an idea of just where certain events took place, but in general you'd really have to be up on your Mexican history to know where all this went on, because the fighting mostly took place in just 4 states.

    Beefs: The film could be shorter without diluting it's impact. Losing 12-18 minutes or so would make it tighter without sacrificing much although its length doesn't kill your interest. I say this because there are scenes that come along, and as you're watching them you just know they aren't necessary to tell the story. The editing here and there could use some going over as at times the film seems to jump back & forth between the adversaries without much finesse. Other comments I've read about this movie rave about the child actor that has the youth lead in the story -an important role- though I find he over-acts. Once I adjusted myself to his mugging it didn't get in the way of the rest of the story. Frankly his taller young friend was more convincing in a much smaller role. One other minor beef: Andy Garcia, who I like in anything, including this, is a bit old to be playing General Gorostieta, who only lived to just over 40. But these are all relatively small potatoes. None of them or even all of them together are reason enough not see the movie. Americans especially just might gain some sorely lacking respect for the intensity of what it has meant to be Mexican in the 20th century.
  • This is a movie about heroes who stood up for freedom – in this case, religious freedom. It's not easy to make a heroic film, but this movie comes reasonably close. There are a few awkward camera movements, and some of the younger actors don't always make the most convincing performances. However, the overall effort is quite moving and convincing. Considering these events actually happened and these are historical figures not fictional characters makes the movie that much more compelling. Some reviewers have argued that the movie is "too Catholic." Considering these were Catholics fighting, eventually, fighting violently, for their freedoms, these criticisms reveal more about the reviewers' prejudices and biases than it does about the film. This is an important, thought-provoking film about freedom that should be seen and discussed.
  • "For Greater Glory" is an amazing film. It's an inspiring retelling of the the Cristeros War against the Mexican government for its having outlawed the Catholic Church and its executions and massacres of those who dared to live out their religious freedom.

    The cast is top-notch and the direction pretty competent, keeping the story weaved among intimate scenes and battle scenes. Filled with poignant moments of the lives of the protagonists and of those close to them and with the heroic - as well as less than heroic - skirmish scenes.

    It's a movie about taking sides courageously, how conflicting this can be in a man's conscience, especially when it involves the spilling of blood. If anything, the personal struggle of many characters getting into this war and carrying it out made the film shine. From the young boy who faced martyrdom for the Catholic faith - Jose Sanchez del Rio, beatified in 2005 - to his uncle, a cowardly mayor too enamored of power to save him.

    I cannot help thinking how timely this film is when the Church and Catholics - for now - are again being curtailed in their freedoms by a government with its own agenda, this time the American government trying to limit the Church's ministry and to force Catholics to violate their consciences. Like Calles, Obama has presented the same arguments to justify his unjustifiable actions against the Church, Catholics and their institutions. It's government might over faith, the collective over the individual, an usurpation of the state to serve not the people, but an ideology.

    PS: disregard most professional critics' reviews for they seem to have a chip on their shoulder so big that it blinds them to the artistic and cinematographic qualities of this film.
  • An under the radar film about a subject I knew nothing about that absolutely floored me. It's a high quality film with flat out superb performances that makes you contemplate and appreciate faith and freedom like few films have ever managed to convey. Yes, it is a faith based film. If that offends some, then this isn't the movie or the subject for you. Unlike other faith based efforts, this effort is not cheesy or ham-fisted or even preachy.

    It's the tale of the Cristeros War (1926-1929); a war by the people of Mexico against the Mexican government who cracked down in brutal ways against the Catholic Church and against religious freedom in general. Andy Garcia is Oscar level good here as General Gorostieta, a man with limited faith who responds and masterfully leads the fight for freedom. It's intense and, at times, surprisingly violent and impactful. This movie delivers real emotion and doesn't dodge tough questions about faith. It delivers an exceptional balance of showing why people behave and choose to engage in certain behaviors even when such behavior is contrary to the core of their belief system.

    One thing is certain; no one who has faith will take it or their religious freedom for granted after watching and EXPERIENCING this film. That's how it registered with me at any rate.
  • "We are now an army, we are an army fighting for Gad and for the church and for absolute freedom." A true story about the Cristeros War (1926-1929) which was a war by the people of Mexico against the atheistic Mexican government led by president Plutarco Elias Calles. Enrique Gorostieta Velarde (Garcia) leads a revolt of Mexican Christians against the government in hopes he can restore Mexico to the faith filled nation it once was. I will start by saying that this is a very good movie and entertaining to watch. I know nothing about the history or how accurate this is but I enjoyed it. The only problem that I had with the movie is that I really felt no connection to any of the characters and when one would get killed or have a serious problem I wasn't invested enough for it to have the impact that it was trying for. That said it doesn't really take away from the enjoyment of the movie but I didn't really feel the emotion that I think the filmmakers were trying for. Garcia is a great choice for this but he seems to play the character he played in "Godfather 3" or the Ocean's movies but a Mexican soldier version and he came off a little too cocky, but like I said I don't know the history and the real guy may have been that way too. It may seem like I'm rambling but the movie was over 2 hours long and it felt it and some parts I found it hard to stay focused on but overall this is a good watch and in my opinion one of the best releases this week. Overall, a good western/war movie that is pretty heavy on the religious issues. I give it a B+.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This film which I have now seen twice is a technically beautiful film which tells the story of the Cristeros War in Mexico. Based on true events, the movie tells the story of an atheist General who leads Catholic fighters against the socialist atheist revolutionary government of Mexico. It also tells the story of a 10 year old boy who leaves his home to fight for the faith and a Catholic priest who must come to terms with his faith and with his desire for revenge.

    The film is shot on location in Mexico and is really cinematically beautiful. There are some disturbing scenes which show the brutality of the Mexican government as well as amazingly uplifting and moving scenes depicting the faith of those fighting.

    This is certainly a film which certain people don't want seen. All the more reason to go and see it. This film is doesn't sugar coat the actions of either side but shows war for what it is -- always brutal and many times necessary.

    Andy Garci give a great performance but it is the boy who plays Jose who steals the show. An amazing performance that is worth seeing.
  • Revolutions are never easy. And sometimes they demand sacrifice. Sacrifice of many things to achieve something for a later generation. It's a tough movie to watch for many reasons, but it's also not taking prisoners (literally at times), which you might like about it or dismiss. But that's how things can go down, when there is uproar.

    We might live in societies today that don't have to fight for certain things, but it's not too much of a stretch to see why and how some had to fight for freedom of speech or religion or other things. The movie depicts a real life event/incidents, which might appall some viewers from the get go, but if you like Drama and History in general, this might be for you. I haven't read too much about how things went down exactly, but I reckon this movie made me aware of a chapter I hadn't had heard about before ...
  • Outstays its welcome. Becomes Christian propaganda especially in end credits. Some fine acting but never get really involved with characters. Important and interesting historical struggle best read about in Wikipedia!
  • This historical chapter plays close to home as my great-grandfather was morally involved and supported the resistance. He was a founder and active participant of the Knights of Columbus in Mexico City. This society played an active financial role in the rebellion. Our family business was also affected by this persecution in Mexico, as he could not sell his most important products, which at the time were altar candles for the churches. In the early years of this escalating situation, my great grandfather, a deeply religious man and friend of the church, hid at his candle factory, church artwork and religious valuables to keep them from being plundered and destroyed by government officials.

    On more than one occasion, based on anonymous tips, government troops personally led by General Plutarco Elías Calles, raided both my great-grandfathers business and his home, looking for firearms and the illegal church valuables that he was hiding. Unable to find anything, the General made my great-grandfather kneel to the ground and shoved his pistol into the back of my great-grandfathers head. Why he never pulled the trigger or why they were never able to find anything either at the candle factory or at his home, was all God's work. At my great-grandfather's home, there were firearms in plain sight standing behind the open doors to the inner rooms… supplied to him by the US Embassy in Mexico City.

    This world is really-really small… as fate would have it be, my brother-in-law married the great-granddaughter of General Plutarco Elías Calles… Although my father knows about this, I never mentioned anything to my grandfather about the subject… Thank God nothing more serious ever happened… there are absolutely no ill-feelings between us, and it sure makes a heck-of-a-good family story for generations to come!

    I hope you have an opportunity to see the movie, it is an important chapter of Mexican history which has been institutionally hidden for almost 100 years now.
  • This is a one sided docudrama about the Cristeros War in Mexico (1926-1929), a war between Catholics against the atheist Government of Mexico.

    Andy Garcia stars as the leader of the revolt Enrique Gorostieta. The big problem with this is his acting style. He is too cold and too regal. It's hard to maintain his humanity while he seems to be above it all.

    There is no doubt that this is a one-sided history. Are they putting on propaganda? Just consider that the production company and money has a lot of Catholic and supporters' fingers on it. Keep that in mind, and watch a pretty good movie.
  • This movie is complicated. It is beautifully shot and has a decent cast but misses the mark badly. This is a story of black(supporters of the church) vs white (the atheistic gov't), there is no grey. The white guys kill the black guys in grotesque manners and spout such strident anti church rhetoric that is reciprocated with beatific exaltations by the black guys that after 10 mins. of screen time all the character become caricatures. It should have been filmed in Spanish to start. I understand, this movie was meant to appeal to white, middle class and up American christians. As well, all the people that matter in this movie are dressed impeccably and appear to have a higher standard of living than most Americans today. All the peasants are blurry background figures. If you are a christian who likes to think it is a us vs them world then this is the movie for you. All others beware.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    A film with heart. It tells the story of the "Cristiada Wars" from the perspective of those fighting for religious freedoms taken away by President Calles, an atheist, who wanted to eradicate what he felt were the corrupting influences of Catholicism in his country. The film depicts what happens when a government oversteps its bounds and tramples on people's way of life, and certainly Catholicism in Mexico had already become culturally entrenched. The film is beautifully made with virtuosic cinematography, an outstanding musical score, and with many wonderful performances. Andy Garcia carries weight as General Gorostieta, and I particularly enjoyed Oscar Isaac as the cynical "El Catorce." The film delicately weaves in other contemporaneous complexities involving the US government and Mexcio without losing sight of the heart of the story, with a terrifically understated performance by Bruce Greenwood as the U.S. Ambassador. As someone who was once Catholic but is no longer practicing, I do not see this as a religious propaganda film, but as a film depicting a people fighting to maintain their way of life and refusing to let a government tell them they can't live what they believe. It is indeed a story from the point of view of people fighting for their faith, but I do not agree with critiques that accuse the filmmakers of creating "propaganda." This is the disadvantage films from the point of view of religious people have - that some secularists immediately and unfairly will label them "propaganda." With such a broad application of the term all film making is to some degree propaganda; after all, there is no drama without "taking a side." As someone who dislikes religion, I did not feel that this was a film that aims to proselytize, but rather one that reveals a period of Mexican history that few people know about within the context of a riveting drama.
  • Truth is, I put off watching this movie for a long time. I'm not exactly sure why, but even though I love Andy Garcia, I just wasn't that impressed with the trailer. Well, I just finished watching it and let me tell you it's a great movie!!! Even in bad movies, Andy Garcia is impressive, but the surprise in this film was Oscar Issac! He was superb.

    This film reminded me a tad bit of "Glory". It had an all star cast and a story line that kept you interested, gave you one or two surprises and was full of sincere moments. Even though I would of liked to see a little more action, the action it delivered was sufficient. The sets and costumes were right on, they did a good job of bringing you into that time period. I would of never of known anything about the Cristeros War and it's heroes if not for this movie. Overall it's an excellent film that everyone should see.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    As a film critic who has a belief (or faith) in a being greater than myself (I know, I've just alienated about 50 percent of the readers), it's hard not to notice Hollywood's prevalent tendency to belittle and impugn Christianity.

    However, with the advent of "Joyful Noise" in January and now "For Greater Glory" I'm wondering if the embracing of religion is the start of a new trend.

    But while "Joyful Noise" was harmless, mindless fluff touching on songs of worship, this new release — bankrolled by several independent, faith-based groups — spares no subtly on its pro-Catholic Church message.

    In fact, it pounds that message into the ground with the force of a jackhammer (as well as poor direction, sub-par acting, often banal dialogue and amateur camera work that is both irritating and seizure-inducing).

    Yet, for all of that, there are some standout performances and an strong emotional thread, plus, I think the story needs to be told — I just wish first-time director Dean Wright (a visual technician for such films as "Titanic") and writer Michael Love ("La Leyenda del Tesoro") could have told it better.

    In 1925, after a series of violent revolutions transformed Mexico from the quiet, bucolic country led by a series of generals, corrupt officials and high-minded civilians, into a quasi-socialist republic, President Plutarco Elias Calles (a terrific job by Ruben Blades, "Safe House") has practically outlawed the Catholic Church, in practice, but not theory.

    His federal soldiers, like the Nazi stormtroopers in "Schindler's List," ride into villages, wreck and desecrate houses of worship, capture and/or kill priests and constantly terrorize believers (where is the Magnificent Seven when we need them?). A series of laws passed several years earlier — to separate church and state — are the basis of these actions.

    Many of the Mexican people, however, with Catholicism so much a part of their culture, begin to fight back, first with passive disobedience and economic embargoes, then, finally, with armed resistance.

    Leading this revolution-within-a-revolution at first is outlaw Victoriano 'El Catorce' Ramirez (Oscar Isaac, "Drive") and his priest brother, Father Vega (Santiago Cabrera, "The Life of Fish").

    A series of underground networks supply men and ammunition, while many women in the country smuggle items for the cause. When the government begins to crack down, however, a more organized resistance is called for.

    Enter Gen. Enrique Gorostieta Velarde (Andy Garcia, "Ocean's Thirteen"), a former war hero who had defeated the likes of Pancho Villa to secure the current administration and its subsequent oppression.

    Even though Velarde (an atheist, that respects freedom of religion) does not want to get involved, pressure from his wife, Tulita (Eva Longoria, a voice in "Arthur Christmas"), and others pushes him into action.

    With his brilliant military strategies, the ragtag army begins to develop discipline and turns the tide of battle (although it seems that the federal troops were getting stomped all over the place, even BEFORE Velarde showed up; they are as incompetent as the German pilots in "Red Tails").

    Subplots include a little boy, Joselito (Maurico Kuri, "La Leyenda del Tesoro"), joining the fight; and United States ambassador to Mexico, Dwight Morrow (Bruce Greenwood, "Thirteen Days"), trying to trade Calles machine guns for extension of oil rights.

    Kuri, at age 14, is one of the best things about the picture, as his emotional scenes with his parents and Father Christopher (a brief appearance by Peter O' Toole, "Troy") are heart-wrenching and horrifyingly real. He and Blades carry the thespian parts of For Greater Glory very well.

    I wish I could say the same about most of the other acting work. Greenwood is always solid, as is Issac, but Garcia (with almost 90% of the screen time) goes from far too laid back to over-the-top. He gives — not one — but three fiery, inspirational speeches (one, on horseback before a battle, is stolen directly from "Braveheart," even down to the underlying musical score from James Horner, and the only thing missing is the blue paint on his face).

    Longoria does the best she can with what she has, but she like most of the others come across as just mouthing their lines or gesturing dramatically.

    Be forewarned though — this is not a family film by ANY stretch of the imagination. There are shootings, stabbings, hangings (including one of a young boy), people being burned alive and a horrid (but short) torture sequence. For Greater Glory certainly earned its "R" rating — and then some.

    The use of independent, religious-based funds shows most glaringly in the technical department, however. The editing is practically non-existent (leading to the 143 minute running time, which could have been trimmed by at least 40 minutes), and the choppy camera work, especially during the battle scenes, is almost unwatchable at times.

    Still, I cannot give this movie a total pass because it is a story worthy of more than the few that have heard of it. See it, if only for that reason.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Official Mexican history has long erased this chapter form it's books. Now this production brings the truth to a greater audience with a masterful movie.

    The plot is guided by a very acute sense of truth and this movie has benefited from the help of Jean Meyer, possibly the top authority in the subject of the "cristiada".

    Special kudos must go to Mauricio Kuri (Jose Sanchez del Rio) for an impressive performance and the undoubtedly excellent Andy Garcia (Enrique Gorostieta).

    Yes, the movie takes some historical liberties, but all the important facts (and a lot of non-important ones) are very historic.

    Moving, attractive, accurate, pleasing to eye and mind, this is a must see.
  • The movie was edited poorly in that it lingered too long on some unimportant scenes and cut short on some important scenes. This disjoints the movie a bit and doesn't allow for a true connection between the viewer and the characters. However, the acting is strong with some key moments of superb emotive performances, but more often the camera cuts and changes the mood too quickly.

    The subject is very interesting, as we here in America are facing the question about religious freedom today. It gives the viewer an opportunity to see what others have done faced with this question, but more importantly 'why' they chose their answer and then acted upon it.

    For Greater Glory is worth seeing, it shines a light on a not so well known war.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This movie is about a time in history that I had not heard of. It is a chronicle of the Cristeros War (1926-1929), which was touched off by a rebellion against the Mexican government's attempt to secularize the country. This is the story about a time when the Mexican Government tried to to shut down the practice of the Catholic faith in it's country, and how the Catholics took up arms(literally there are priest shooting guns) to defend the freedom of religion. There are very disturbing scenes in which the government troops attack Catholic churches during Mass and kill priests in the sanctuary. There is also some disturbing scenes with the torture and killing of some ten-year old boys. It should probably get a R-Rating for this content. I think this is an important movie for everyone to see because it shows what happens when the government tries to shut down the freedom of religion, and it also shows what is the result of fighting for your beliefs. There are some eerie parallels to what is happening today. The message deals seriously with the issues of non-violent vs. violent protesting, what it means to have faith or not and confession. The movie portrays the various characters dealing with these issues in a few different ways.
  • I'm not familiar with the actual events and can therefore not comment on the authenticity of the story, but I've done some research and it pretty much does the events justice.

    Since I'm generally not fond of religious movies, I thought this wouldn't appeal to me, but I found myself more and more intrigued by the film. As it progressed, I was drawn deeper into the action and drama. This was an interesting blend of war, action, western and drama. The cinematography was really great. The religious theme aside, you're bound to enjoy this film for the sheer action adventure and high level of entertainment it provides!

    Andy Garcia was very good, but Mauricio Kuri stole the show as 14-year old Jose. Man, he was really good!! This is a very sad yet inspiring story. Loved it!
  • This film becomes a story that mislead peopl's vision of the situation in Mexico. The Mexican Revolution had started in 1910 and after the 1917 constitution the situation was becoming almost normal. However, the Presidential power remained strong and with little checks and balances. President Plutarco Díaz Calles in his short term used some constitutional laws repressed freedom of cult to the very limit.Historians point to his past as an unrecognized child in the eyes of the Catholic church. The guerras cristeras were rebellions in some of the Mexican states, fighting for freedom or Christian traditions. They were over by 1929: the next prseident cancelled the abusive laws and an agreement was soon reached. The overall situation in the country is not reflected by this film. While the 1929 Wall Street Crash led most counties to the Dark thirties, with increasing poverty and dictatorships, Mexico's society, on the contrary, grew even more stable, economically sound, socially advanced and living in in justice. The film openly hides the whole process. You can see the forest for the trees.
  • I just saw For Greater Glory today, and I took away from it an enormous respect for the Catholic faith of the Mexican people. It was a riveting story that I knew nothing about. The young actor who played Jose stole the show, with Father Vega taking a very close second. Definitely worth the time and money to see this movie. It also helped me understand why people defend the right of religious freedom so ferociously in our country when they feel it is being infringed upon by our government. I loved the musical score, and the cinematography - the costumes, the sets, all were excellent. I agree with some other reviews that there were a few things that could have been trimmed in the edit room - I feel we could have lost all the scenes with the US Ambassador without missing much. I hope you go see this movie.
  • Released in 2012 and directed by Dean Wright, "For Greater Glory" (subtitled "The True Story of Cristiada") chronicles the Cristeros War in central Mexico, a veritable civil war from 1926-1929 where Catholic citizens had no recourse but to take a bold stand against the atheistic Mexican government, ran by President Calles (Rubén Blades), who sought to stamp out Catholicism by forbidding masses, destroying churches and exiling or murdering priests. Andy Garcia plays the Cristeros general, Enrique Gorostieta, who's initially an atheist, but is eventually inspired by the events. Oscar Isaac and Eduardo Verástegui play his subordinates while Eva Longoria plays his wife. Peter O'Toole is on hand as an aging priest while Mauricio Kuri appears as a boy moved to join the Cristeros. All the main characters are based on real-life people.

    While this is a historical war/drama/action movie it could also be designated as a Western, albeit a Mexican Western. But don't expect some of the stereotypical staples of most Westerns, like quick-draw showdowns, saloons, cavalry vs. Indians, saloon girls, stampedes and cattle drives. This is a realistic detailing of the events with quite a bit of action and an occasional eye-rolling dramatic sequence.

    Some of the comments by critics are clueless in that they try to argue that the actual situation in Mexico at the time was more complex than the movie shows. Ya think? What else is new? All movies based on historical events try to simplify the situation to make the story palatable to viewers. Critics also argue that the movie's too "one-sided" and some even attempt to defend Calles' tyrannical oppression. Seriously? No matter how you slice it he tried to stamp out a deep-rooted religion in his country through oppression and murder. He actually thought he could rid the populace of Catholicism in a year's time. He was wrong. He also underestimated the Cristeros and was thoroughly humbled.

    By 1929 the Federals had 100,000 troops whereas the Cristeros only had half that, and many of them were women. During the three years of fighting the Federals lost 57,000 soldiers while the Cristeros 'only' lost 30,000. Altogether an estimated 250,000 people lost their lives and the same number fled Mexico.

    This is a good movie to remind us that "the government" can easily morph into a tyrannical dictator in a moment's notice if the citizenry isn't vigilant. Consider the USA, for example: If Americans keep electing doofus Demoncraps to high office the so-called Supreme Court will eventually have a libertine majority and, faster than you can blink, Christianity and religious freedom would be eradicated overnight. Suddenly it would be a "hate crime" to say such-and-such is a sin and evangelizing would be outlawed. Make no mistake, it could happen in a heartbeat. Remember in 2014 when the city of Houston subpoenaed pastors' sermons as part of a crackdown on preaching against homosexuality?

    The movie was based on the 1976 book The Cristero Rebellion, a chronicle of the war written by French historian Jean Meyer who resides in Mexico, and was naturally approved by Catholic organizations (probably funded to some degree, as well). However, the movie's not completely "one-sided," as critics claim, which is admirable. For instance, President Calles (the "villain") offers peace terms to General Gorostieta (the "good guy") in a secret parley that seems reasonable to me, but the general is too proud to accept them. Once the dust settles the war concludes based on essentially the same pact Gorostieta rejected, with the mediation of the United States ambassador (Bruce Greenwood), who happened to be related to Charles Lindbergh. The USA government then provided Calles with machine guns while Mexico granted protection for America's oil interests. So it's not all black and white, and you have to give kudos to a film that honestly chronicles political & moral ambiguities.

    A Mexican production, the movie runs 145 minutes and was shot entirely in Mexico. The locations are awesome, by the way. The screenplay was written by Michael Love. On the DVD there's a 27-minute documentary on the Cristeros War & the movie, which is worth checking out.

    GRADE: B
  • swimcchs5 September 2012
    I worry about the poor theology behind some of the lines played up in the trailer: "Men pull the triggers, but God decides where the bullets land." In an effort to emphasize Catholics/Christians as persecuted and under fire, this movie glosses over the fact that the Mexican Bishops did not support the Christeros uprising and neglects the historical roots of the Church's role in Mexican economics and politics which led to the reactionary backlash and persecution of the Church during this time period. The movie Romero might be a worthwhile antidote for those who are discouraged by "Greater Glory." The Knights of Columbus of the United States seemed to be strongly in favor of promoting this movie, possibly because of K of C martyrs who are being considered for sainthood. Given the merger between Christianity and American Nationalism which seems to be emerging so strongly in the USA today, one would hope that Catholics would rise above the fray.
  • As a Catholic very concerned about the anti-Catholic direction of our society, I wanted to see For Greater Glory. But after reading the reviews on RottenTomatoes, I assumed it would be a good message poorly presented. I could not have been farther from the truth. This was a excellent movie - especially for a directorial debut. Even if you are not Catholic you will find this movie very moving and well done.

    Andy Garcia is excellent - he even shows intense emotions. Mauricio Kuri had an outstanding rookie performance. Nestor Carbonell's role was perfect for him. Peter O'Toole was a wonderful surprise if short lived.

    Ignore RottenTomatoes - you will not be disappointed!
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Gawd, what splendid photography. Spacious, craggy. and sunswept Central Mexico where the Cristados fought for the freedom to practice their religion in the late 1920. It's the kind of place you'd like to retire to in order to avoid the humidity of Miami Beach, the urban sprawl of Southern California, and the increasing congestion of Arizona.

    It's so easy to visualize the reward after a lifetime of hard work. Oh, Camarero -- another margarita, por favor? It's so picture-postcard pretty that the epic scenery almost overwhelms the tense and action-filled story of the last phase of all those Mexican revolutions of one hundred years ago.

    Ruben Blades is President Calles, who passed a series of laws that looked very much like an attempt to secularize Mexico and eliminate Catholicism. The reasons can only be guessed at. The church was a powerful moral and political force. Maybe Calles thought it was a little too powerful. The church also owned an awful lot of land and other valuables.

    In any case Blades gives an innovative and thoughtful performance as a leader who could easily have been shown as no more than another one of those evil swarthy people with shiny big teeth and greasy locks.

    His performance is matched by almost everyone else in the cast, perhaps with the exception of Oscar Isaac who, like most of the other principals, is of Hispanic origin but who struck me as an American guy struggling with a Spanish accent. As the first priest to be executed by firing squad, the ancient Peter O'Toole delivers the thoroughly believable goods. The ostensible hero is Andy Garcia as the historically real General Enrique Gorostieta, an atheist who was hired to lead the revolt. Garcia is no longer a sleek handsome youth but age has made him more impressive. And, in fact, Gorostieta WAS hired to organize the resistance, and he demanded a good sum as well as insurance for his family.

    That's one of the film's more admirable points -- the way there are these little inserts of coarse history. Calles, the "bad guy", offers peace terms that seem reasonable, but Gorostieta is too proud to accept them. The revolt was finally settled after Gorostieta's death, essentially based on the same agreement he'd rejected, with the intervention of the United States ambassador, who was Charles Lindbergh's father-in-law. As part of the agreement, the US provided the Mexican government with machine guns and Mexico in turn agreed to protect American oil interests. See? Nothing is altogether cut and dried, and you have to respect a movie that takes on the challenge of displaying ambiguity in its characters.

    Not that there's ever much doubt in the mind of the ordinary viewer about which side is good and which is bad. The movie may be complicated but human judgments aren't. So freedom of religion is "good" while the suppression of freedom is "bad." The story illustrates the point that sometimes religion is worth killing and dying for. I wonder how the film would have turned out if the religion had been an Islamic sect.

    The director doesn't match the majestic scenery, the perceptive performances, the credible art direction, and the skillful make up and wardrobe. John Ford shot the assassination of Abraham Lincoln in long shot. No such restraint here. The director does his best to push all the thoroughly commercialized emotional buttons. When O'Toole is bulletized, the camera cuts to a closeup of his agonized face, his features cut off in mid prayer. When a young boy is murdered we here the thud of the knife hilt against his back and there is a close up of his agonized face. The camera lingers on him as he falls to the ground before the coup de gras. Important deaths are in slow motion, sometimes VERY slow motion.

    It almost seems as if the screenplay and the direction are at odds with one another -- the screenplay yearning for a combination of action and character, along the lines of "Lawrence of Arabia," while the direction aims for a simple and successful movie about good guerrillas fighting tyranny,.
  • I couldn't believe the events in the movie happened as depicted, so I researched the subject enough to convince myself that this movie is not historically accurate but exaggerates the barbarity of the government actions against the church, attempts to make it appear that the Catholic church is the only group persecuted, and ignores that the church did not want religious freedom, but wanted the government to enforce Catholicism as the state religion.

    There's enough injustice and suffering in the world; there's no need to lie or distort, except of course when you have your own agenda. And exaggerating and distorting event from almost 100 years ago to divide people now is especially contemptible.

    Or course now I will be condemned as supporting the Mexican government's actions, which I don't, because of course if you disagree with a fanatic then you must be taking a position 180 degrees the opposite. So if I say this movie distorts, I must hate freedom. Fox news teaches us this.

    Some people who think it's OK to lie and distort in support of their favorite cult and/or religion (sorry, I still don't know the difference) may be surprised at what they find when this veil passes away.
An error has occured. Please try again.