User Reviews (57)

Add a Review

  • I certainly understand why a lot of the Transformer, Disney Amusement Park and Fast and the Furious fans didn't get this movie at all, but and gave it ridiculously low scores, but this was a very very good film for the adults in the room. It was well written it was very well acted and it was a great production.

    This is not an easy film to watch as it is a very strong story as any story about the Holocaust should be. But this film had a lot to say and I thought it said it in a very moving and emotional fashion. I

    I believed the story I believed in the characters and I highly recommend this film for adults who can deal with a real story without car chases bombing and constant mayhem.
  • esso-547995 August 2020
    What a great movie, believable and well scripted. Both lead characters, both young and old are portrayed really well. A good storyline and history. If you enjoy movies relating to WW2 you will find this a touching drama. The musical score is beautiful.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Who decided that a great young musician on his way to his first featured performance could fall asleep on a bus? I mean, really? And then randomly meet a survivor of the same camp his family died in just round the corner from the synagogue where one of the last surviving Rabbi's from the same camp kept the oral list of the names of the dead? Does no one vet this stuff in pre-production?

    Great performances from the younger cast, and good from all, although expecting Clive Owen to consistently deliver an accent as a Brooklyn Jew originally from Warsaw and raised in London is a stretch.

    Beautifully and expensively filmed and produced. Still mystified about the actors "playing" the violin so well.
  • Yes, this is a wonderful and memorable film. The director, Francois Girard, and, I suspect, the same Canadian production company were involved in the 1998 RED VIOLIN. Like that film it takes place over multiple time periods, in this film clearly stated to be 1951, 1986, and the earliest, unidentified time which can be inferred to be sometime between March and September 1939. The scene shifts back and forth a good deal and some critics found this confusing and destructive of continuity but I found no difficulty in following the story line. Memory is not linear and orderly but rather fragmented and out of sequence, particularly when dealing with highly charged emotionally traumatic experiences. This is an exceptionally intelligent screenplay where not everything has to be spelled out. It's true that a key plot point mystery is fairly predictable. Yet the story builds to a wrenching climax in a way you don't see every day in the movies. Tim Roth plays well against type as a quiet, introspective Brit. The score composer, Howard Shore, was involved in composing the impressive music in the Lord of the Rings and does an award-deserving job here. I rate the film at 3.5/4 stars. Strongly recommended for everybody, especially any serious music student as well as anyone of Jewish background, particularly of GenX through to Millennials.
  • There are some great aspects to this film. The scenes of childhood & the actors in the midst of WW2 are well depicted. Safe relatively in England, far safer than Poland.

    The time shifting sequences flipping from one era to another made things stilted & confusing & annoying more than interesting.

    Excellent sets in Poland esp Treblinka & in Hampstead where the main character encounters a survivor of Treblinka & then learns about his own family.

    Worth watching but this film could have been outstanding.

    Exploring the aspect of the holocaust on those who had managed to leave or not but survive makes a great basis for exploring humanity & the challenges of going on after loss.

    The story meanders a lot which gets in the way of building a sense of connection to the adults; the earlier scenes when the key characters are still boys manages to build that connection.
  • ferguson-68 January 2020
    Warning: Spoilers
    Greetings again from the darkness. The title refers to a sacred Jewish ritual where the names of the Holocaust victims are recited in a musical style. It's a process that (sadly) covers a few days. In this film, it takes on a personal, as well as historical, significance. British cultural affairs expert Norman Lebrecht wrote the 2001 novel on which writer-director Francois Girard (THE RED VIOLIN, 1998, plus plays, operas and 2 Cirque de Soleil shows) and co-writer Jeffrey Caine based the film.

    We open in 1951 London just minutes before the scheduled performance of young violin virtuoso Dovidl "David" Rapoport. He is to play Bruch and Bach in a concert sponsored by his "adoptive" father figure Gilbert Simmonds, who has sunk his entire life savings into producing the concert. Despite the assurances of Simmonds' son Martin, who has become like a brother to David, the featured performer is a no-show ... leading Martin to search for him over the next 35 years.

    The film covers the story from the time Dovidl's Polish-Jewish father (played by Jakub Kotynski) agrees to his leave 9 year old, a violin prodigy, with the non-Jewish Simmonds in an attempt to protect the boy from the German invasion of Poland in the late 1930's. As Dovidl and Martin grow together, their bond become stronger. Martin is present when Dovidl renounces Judaism, even as becomes more proficient with his instrument and more saddened by the Holocaust that he avoided in his home country.

    Both boys are played at three different ages by three different actors. Dovidl is played by Luke Doyle at ages 9-13, Jonah Hauer-King at ages 17-23, and by Clive Owen in middle age. Martin is played by Misha Handley at ages 9-13, Gerran Howell at ages 17-23, and by Tim Roth in later life. The actors do a good job of capturing Martin's early irritation at Dovidl's arrogance, the shock of the no-show betrayal, and the later in life man who changed everything when he found out about his family, as well as the music teacher so desperate to find his long lost friend/brother.

    The film bounces between the three timelines so that we have a full picture of the impact they have had on each other's lives, and how Dovidl's disappearing act was quite devastating. Much of the film centers on Martin tracking down leads and talking to folks for some idea of the path taken by Dovidl. Mr. Roth is especially effective (and surprisingly understated) in his performance as a man haunted by the unexplained actions of a loved one. His wife, played by Catherine McCormick, is simultaneously understanding, patient, and emotionally affected.

    Stanley Townsend plays Martin's father. He cares for Dovidl as if her were a son, and provides what's necessary for the prodigy to develop and be groomed for performance. Three-time Oscar winner Howard Shore delivers a score that follows the good times and bad, not an easy task for a family drama within the shadow of the Holocaust. One specific sequence stands out, and it is filmed on the hallowed grounds of Treblinka - now a memorial, where the extermination camp once stood.

    There are many facets to the story, and most involve heavy emotions. We see children bearing more than they should. Parents protecting their children in times of crisis. The difference between religion and ethnicity is discussed. Broken trust proves especially damaging. Dovidl's disappearing act could be compared to that of JD Salinger, in that he seemingly disappeared for years. And maybe most of all, the idea of survivor's guilt is a theme, as Dovidl explains, "You don't have to be guilty to feel guilty." The film may have some pacing issues, but it affords such a wealth of conversation topics, that any flaws are easily forgiven.
  • The latest movie from the director who gave us the wonderful "The Red Violin".A film about Family, friendship, music and the holocaust. Good performances from all the cast, a good plot and an okay script. This film definitely pulls at the heartstrings.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This movie has a great plot - in 1947, a Polish Jewish violin prodigy, living in London, suddenly disappears, leaving his English close friend, whose family looked after the violinist, angry and sad. Despite loved ones urging him to move on, the friend goes on a journey over many years to find the violinist. He follows a narrow thread of people who met the violinist and who can contribute clues about what happened to him. This movie makes you think about all those Holocaust survivors, some living overseas, who lost all their family in concentration camps. How did they survive such horror? How did they go on to build a life? How could anyone else possibly understand what they went through?

    The reaction of the friend when he finds the violinist is silly and unnecessary. Also the violinist's final demand to his his friend is cruel and silly, too - he calls him "my brother" then is really cruel to him? It doesn't make sense.

    There are some amazing scenes. Historically the years just after WWII are overlooked, perhaps because people wanted to forget the atrocities and start anew.

    This film puts you right back in that era, in a very realistic way.
  • This is a wonderful and haunting film. It tells the story of two boys who grow up together. They are brothers through circumstances: the violinist child prodigy from the Warsaw Jewish community and the London lad who eventually befriends him when they are brought together. The story revolves around the sudden disappearance, on the day of his virtuoso concert, of the prodigy. Only near the end of the film do we discover why.

    The film brilliantly deals with multiple layers and flashbacks, with perfect pacing and quite outstanding acting. The musical score is phenomenal.

    This is a film about tragedy and loss, about how trauma lives on. It perfectly weaves the themes of ethnicity and religion.

    It's a superb, haunting, film which I have not done justice here. In part that's because I don't want to do a review with spoilers. You have to go and see this film and allow your soul to be transported by the wonderful cinematography, script and musical score.

    They don't make films as beautiful and brilliant as this very often. Go see it.
  • Watched on the 75th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz. Quite the emotional tug. Stitching the movie's three timelines together was interesting, and in parts the dialog -- spartan -- was excellent. The so-called shocker ending was rather ad hoc, but I would recommend this movie.
  • dierregi28 October 2021
    Warning: Spoilers
    Dov is an arrogant child prodigy, violin player, from a Polish Jewish family. His father decides to take him to London, to study and there he leaves Dov, boarding with an English family, just at the eve of WWII. You can already see how this is heading south and it does, but at snail's pace.

    During the Blitz, Dov starts an uneasy friendship with Martin, the English family son, and they became best buddies. At the end of the war and after a useless search, it is feared - but not confirmed - that Dov's family ended up in Treblinka.

    Dov is now a sullen, nasty and mean youngster, but still a hell of a violin player. Angry at everybody he renounces the Jewish religion and embarks on a self-destructive course until the eve of his first solo concert. Then he disappears, ruining his adoptive family. The bulk of the plot is Martin's search for Dov, 35 years later.

    The film is edited with three interspersed timelines and it does not make for an easy viewing.

    Even considering his suffering, Dov is a most unpleasant, selfish, destructive character who does not elicit much sympathy. Martin is supposed to be the best person, but he's merely a plot device, to enhance Dov's uniqueness.

    The end is annoyingly predictable, if anything enhancing once more what a prima donna, unlovable, egotistic character Dov is.
  • clairedoylemt14 September 2019
    An exquisitely unfolding story that approaches the horror of the Holocaust from a different perspective - that of the many refugees who suspected but were left in the agony of uncertainty. The restrained Britishness of the era is beautifully depicted and - just like some of the most effective and emotive music - times its climax to perfection.
  • Apparently there were no women, all Jews are also men. I normally like movies with music duels, and still falls very short. none of the characters make connection with the audience, they're motivation is useless and no real plot
  • denise-882-13902330 October 2021
    The Song of Names, a way to remember the names of the dead from the holocaust, is poignant and deeply moving. This film did not do it justice.

    Dov, the boy genius from Warsaw is left by his father in London, under the care of an English non-Jewish family, where he can continue to hone his talent of playing the violin. The father returns to Poland to rejoin the rest of his family on the brink of the breakout of world war two.

    We are then left with Dov, his journey of life and that of his English "brother" Martin.

    Unfortunately, Dov is never very likeable at any of the ages portrayed in the film and to be honest, neither is Martin nor Martin's wife, Helen.

    The suffering of those around them, Martin's father, the rabbi, the Jewish survivors in London, the polish girl in Warsaw and Joseph, the other polish violinist, all of whom we only get fleeting glances of, is more affecting than that of the central characters.

    I simply don't know what to make of this film.

    Watch it by all means, for the music alone and to understand the meaning of the title and maybe you will have a different reaction than I did.
  • This is a fictional story but is built on the realities of the 1940s when Jews in Poland were persecuted and many murdered by the Nazis. The title of the movie is a reference to a way to remember the dead until they could all be written down. They created a Song of Names and in this story is said to take 5 days to sing completely.

    The story spans about 1939 to about 1986. It starts with a young boy (David), a violin prodigy, who is placed with a British family in London to be able to study violin while his family return to Poland. He and the family's young son (Martin) eventually become almost like brothers.

    In 1951 when the boys are in their early 20s, and David is set up for a concert, he doesn't show up with no clue what happened. Then 35 years later Martin is judging a musical competition and sees a young violinist with a mannerism just like David's, that sparks his search for David.

    The reasons are complex and Martin eventually learns what happened. It is a good story that ultimately relies on strong family and friendship bonds.

    Good movie, my wife and I watched it at home on BluRay from our public library.
  • fmwongmd11 July 2020
    Passing on of oral traditions in the Jewish culture is the backstory. The real story is interesting and well portrayed by Tim Roth and Clyde Owens.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    "The Song of Names", directed by the wonderful François Girard, surpassed all of my expectations! The story is about the relationship two "brothers", and how that relationship changes over the years as the mystery unfolds. The score, by the great Howard Shore, expertly showcases the film's haunting, mysterious tone. Acting, directing and cinematography, to name a few, were all brilliant. Certainly worth a watch, even if just for the magnificent violin solos! The film catches your attention from the very first scene and leaves you wanting more after the shocking finale. I would recommend this film to musicians, as well as anyone who loves a good character-based mystery!
  • Warning: Spoilers
    First, let me say that the young actors who played the boys were excellent. After that, the movie was a bit of a boring time watching the one travel from place to place trying to find out where the other one went. There's not much of a mystery to it, but a lot of scenes in cars, planes, etc... following the trail.

    When he finally finds him, his explanation for not showing up to the concert is that after going out and getting laid, he had run into someone who verified that his family died at Treblinka. He was upset and had to immediately do his formal religious grieving process right then and now. After that he just vanished because he was only interested in going around to pay tribute to the dead.

    While it's understandable that finding out his family had died was a blow, it's not like it was a surprise. He was pretty sure of it for years, but of course held out hope. His father had entrusted him to the care of the other boys father, who had raised him for free and treated him like a little prince, even at the expense of his real son. That man had put everything he had into the concert, which then this guy ditched. Not a word of explanation, or thanks, just didn't show up and disappeared. The man who lost everything because of the cancelled concert died shortly after.

    So, after finding out that this guy he was trying to find was a bit of a selfish jerk, this poor man's wife informs him that the violin player was with her before the planned concert that day. His reaction is to just smile at her. Really?????
  • "The Song of Names" is a film with Clive Owen and Tim Roth elegantly directed by Francois Girard. It tells the story of two young boys who develop a friendship over a shared love of music. Young Polish violin prodigy Dovidl Rapoport comes to live with the family of Martin Simmonds in the days preceding the German bombings of London, England during WWII.

    The story continues showing different periods of Dovidl and Martin's lives from adolescence to mature adulthood. With the excellent acting, screenplay by Jeffrey Caine and Girard's conscientious direction, the film is a gift to the viewing public!
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I saw this movie and had the chance to discuss it with Girard at the 2019 FIN Atlantic film festival while covering it for the radio where I work. I honestly did not expect much from this simple fact : the description made of the movie from anything I could read did everything except say what the movie was about. It said "beautiful saga across three decades and four countries" or "story of friendship, family, etc. etc." but no plot description. When this happens, it's usually because you have a weak plot.

    The plot though, was not as cheap as the screenwriting. The plot is another ww2 holocaust drama (for some reason, we can't seem to ever make positive movies about jewish accomplishments, etc., only stories about the holocaust. This is an important topic, yes, though it has been treated in the multiple hundreds of films on the topic), with as an "original" twist, a musical background. This isn't bad, and makes up most of the scenes. It leads to the first and only interesting thing in the film - SPOILER - the use of song (the type in jewish liturgy) to memorize the names of people who disappeared during the Shoa. Though the music is beautiful, we aren't treated to any of the real "memory songs". we get a composition for the film score.

    The shape of the story solidly bothered me. It's absurdly cheap - we've seen it all time and time again. Someone disappears, later it becomes a sort of "detective story" in order to find the person who went missing, etc. All you get is again "Protagonist goes to some place. Asks questions. Looks for person. Goes to next place, asks questions, etc.". Not only is it a cheap and very common way to structure a story nowadays, but the realism of it hangs by a thread.

    Nonetheless, the actors are remarkable, aesthetically the film is extremely well done, musically it's very nice. You might be moved by some parts, but overall this film is nothing you're never seen before, and you might not remember it later on. Watch it on Netflix, where it's bound to end up.
  • I assume most negative reviewer here were looking for action - or something. The extreme sadness is not for everyone. This movie had us on the edge of our seat, neither of us with dry eyes. There is quite a twist in the end. Well worth a watch.
  • This story is so effective and so emotional, that it sends chills right down my spine. I feel so connected with the story and the characters, that I feel their pain and their anguish. It is a wonderful film.
  • "The Name of Songs" (2019 release from Canada; 113 min.) brings the story of Martin and David. As the movie opens, it is "London 1951" and Martin and his dad have a full venue as they await the arrival of Polish 21 yr. old violin prodigy David. But David is a no-show, and the concert is canceled. We then go "Thirty Five Years Later" and now middle-aged Martin is a judge in a music competition in Newcastle, where a boy Peter has something that once clearly belonged to David. It makes Martin to want to track down David. We then go back even further in time, to 1939 when David and his father are visiting with Martin and his family, and David's father decides to leave David with them (ostensibly so that David can take private music lessons, but likely also to keep David out of Poland, about to be invaded by the Germans). At this point we are less than 15 min. into the movie but to tell you more of the plot would spoil your viewing experience, you'll just have to see for yourself how it all plays out.

    Couple of comments: this is the latest film from longtime Canadian director Francois Girard. Here he brings the novel of the same name (from Norman Lebrecht) to the big screen. I haven't read the novel so I cannot comment how closely the movie sticks to the novel. What I can say is that the film seems to be well-intended, but unfortunately is dreadfully boring, devoid from any and all emotion. I didn't notice a single person cracking a smile in the entire movie. I'm not spoiling anything that there is a connection with the Holocaust. And yes, the Holocaust is a very serious matter, and many movies have tackled it in a way that makes your blood boil at what happened and ache for the people who lived through it. But I never felt any connection with any of these characters. Tim Roth (as the adult Martin) tries the best he can with the weak hand he's been dealt. Clive Owen, on the other hand, as the adult David, is simply sleepwalking through the movie. I can't recall a worse performance in Owen's distinguished career. The movie features a ton of classical music, which for me is one of the better aspects of this movie.

    "The Song Of Names" premiered at last Fall's Toronto International Film Festival to ho-hum acclaim, and showed up last weekend at my local art-house theater here in Cincinnati. I went to see it this weekend. The Sunday early evening screening where I saw this at was not attended well (8 people to be exact). Given the nature of the film and, more importantly, how weak a film it is, I cannot see this play much longer in the theater. Of course I encourage you to check this out, be it in the theater (if you still can), on VOD, or eventually on DVD/Blu-ray, and draw your own conclusion.
  • In the age of phony CGI and juvenile comic books on the screen, it is a rare breath of fresh air to be immersed in a shining example of what the art of cinema can be. "Song of Names" brings thoughtful story telling, emotion, fraternal love and pathos to the screen. The music has the power to bring tears to the eyes of all but the most shallow. Seeing this gem was the highlight of my week.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    A great first half after which exact point it fell apart. There was just not enough story left to fill the time. Either that or just not enough effort was made.

    After a long second half meander full of half meanings and improbable motivations the now disappointing and unlikely lead character gets his chance to vindicate himself and give the weary viewer a chance of closure, of extracting some meaning from the previous hour's trudge through dramatic mediocrity.

    HIs final performance which should have been the film's grand climax was just flabby compared with the scintillating playing of the boy at the outset of the film. This, despite the director having laboriously visually demonstrated the older man morphing back into the passionate little boy genius.

    The superb idea of blending the Song of Names with the boy's life experience in this final piece of music was just thrown away in a rather dull an attenuated sentimental piece and the lovely blended part with cantor and violin did not last long enough to emotionally involve you. There was shot after shot of captivated faces which jarred with the weakly sentimental nature of this passionless piece which was unbelievably poor apart from the tantalisingly few bars where the two melodies met and blended so gloriously.

    There was so much potential here for a magnificent tear jerking masterpiece. I loved the first half then felt abandoned, bored, and finally just disappointed.
An error has occured. Please try again.